SYLLABUS FOR CIVIL PROCEDURE I.
For Academic Year 2022-2023
I. Course Description
This course is a study on the application of procedural laws in the
resolution of civil disputes, with emphasis on the jurisdictional
requirements in civil actions, Rules 1 to 39 of the 1997 Rules of
Court as amended by A.M. No. 19-10-20-SC.The course also
includes a discussion of the rules governing small claims,
appropriate modes of dispute resolution such as mediation,
barangay conciliation, etc. Applicable jurisprudence on the various
provisions shall likewise be discussed. Students shall also be
taught the relevant legal forms.
II. Reference
No required annotated book on Civil Procedure but be sure to have
a copy of the codal provisions.
III. Evaluation
Class Participation will be given 50 %. Midterm examinations will
be given 25% while the Final Examinations will be given another
25%.
IV. Course outline
Week 1: General Principles
Difference between substantive law and remedial law
Primicias v. Ocampo, G.R. No. L-6120, 30 June 1953
Classifications of Courts and their respective Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction vs. Exercise of Jurisdiction
Ello v. Judge of First Instance of Antique, G.R. No. L-
26802, 23 July 1926
Difference between Jurisdiction and Venue
Radiowealth Finance Company v. Pineda, G.R. 227147,
30 July 2018
Principle of Judicial Hierarchy
Dy v. Hon. Bibat-Palamos, et. al., G.R. No. 196200 , 11
September 2013
Doctrine of Non-Interference/Judicial Stability
Panlilio, et. al v. Salonga, G.R. No. 113087, 27 June 1994
Week 2: Rule 1 General Principles
Rule 2 Cause of Action
Aquino et. al., v. Quiazon, et. al. G.R. No. 201248 March
11, 2015
Zuniga-Santos v. Santos-Gran, G.R. No. 197380, 8 October
2014
Ada v. Baylon, G.R. No. 182435, 13 August 2012
Rule 3. Parties to Civil Action
Navarro v. CA, G.R. No. 100257. June 8, 1992.
Rule 4.Venue of Actions
Briones v. CA, G.R. No. 204444, 14 January 2015
Ley Construction and Development Corporation v. Sedano,
G.R. No. 222711, 23 August 2017
Racpan v. Barroga-Haigh, G.R. No. 234499, 6 June 2018
Radiowealth Finance Company Inc. v. Pineda, G.R. No. 277147,
30 July 2018
Philippine Banking Corporation v. Tensuan, G.R. No. 104649,
28 February 1994
Week 3. Rule 6. Kinds of Pleadings - name in docu week 3 case digest
1. Galvez v. CA, G.R. No. 157445, 3 April 2013 done
2.. Bungcayao v. Fort Ilocandia Property Holdings, G.R. No.
170483, 19 April 2010-on counterclaim
Rule 7.Parts of Pleadings
3. Fernandez v. Villegas, G.R. No. 200191 August 20, 2014-
verification
4.Victoriano v. Dominguez, G,R. 214794, 23 July 2018-
verification and non-form shopping
5.Fernando Medical Enterprises, Inc. v. Wesleyan University
Philippines, Inc., G.R. NO. 207970, 20 January 2016- on
material averments
6.Far East Marble v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 94093 August
10, 1993- ultimate facts v. evidentiary facts
7.Salita v. Magtolis-G.R. No. 106429 June 13, 1994-ultimate
facts
Rule 8. Manner of Making Allegations in Pleadings
Rule 9. Effect of Failure to Plead
Panganiban v. Pilipinas Shell, G.R. No. 131471, 22 January
2003
Lui Enterprises, Inc. v. Zuellig Pharma Corporation and the
8.Philippine Bank of Communications G.R. No. 193494, 7
March 2014- Rules on Default and Effect
9.Villareal v. CA, G.R. No. 107314, 17 September 1998-On
Default
Rule 10. Amended and Supplemental Pleadings
10.Central Bank Board Of Liquidators v. Banco Filipino Savings
And Mortgage Bank, G.R. No. 173399, 21 February 2017
11.Constantino v. Reyes, G.R. No. L-16853 , 29 June 1963- on
amendment of pleadings
Week 4 Rule 11. When to File Responsive Pleadings
1. Continental Cement Corporation V. Court Of Appeals And
Municipality Of Norzagaray, G.R. No. 88586 , 27 April 1990
FACTS: RTC 1.Municipality filed complaint for recovery of taxes against petitioner RTC. Filed
2 succesive motion for extension to file Res. Pleading granted, last day 2nd extension filed a
motion to dismiss ground on lack of Capacity and cause of action. MTD denied lack of merit and
improperly filed. Plaintiff filed the petitioner in default for having filed a motion to dismiss and
not a responsive pleading.
Issue: whether or not the motion to dismiss was seasonably filed. No, under R16 S1 of ROC
w/in time for pleading a motion to dismiss the action may be made on the grounds therein
enumerated.
RULE 11 SEC 1, SEC 4 RULE 16 allows the defendant to file an answer not only within
original 15 days period also w/a different period as fixed by the court.
2. Gelacio E. Tumambing V. Mauro Ganzon, Et Al, Mauro
Ganzon, G.R. No. L-17456, 22 October 1966 CALLED
3. Noemi S. Cruz, Et. Al. V. City Of Makati, Et. Al, G.R. No.
210894, 12 September 2018.
4.Republic Of The Philippines, V. Sandiganbayan , G.R. No.
148154 17 December 2007
5.Virata V. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 106527. 6 April 1993.
6.Aberca, Et. Al V. Ver, Et. Al, G.R. No. 166216 , 14 March
2012.
7.Solar Team Entertainment, Inc. V. Bautista-Ricafort, Et. Al,
G.R. No. 132007, 5 August 1998
8.Bernice Joan Ti, V. Manuel S. Diño, G.R. No. 219260, 6
November 2017.
9.Palileo, Et. Al V. Planters Development Bank, G.R. No.
193650, October 2014
10.Interlink Movie Houses, Inc. Et. Al. V Court Of Appeals,
G.R. No. 203298, 17 January 2018
11.People's General Insurance Corporation V. Guansing, Et. Al.
G.R. No. 204759, 14 November 2018.
12.Republic Of The Philippines V. Dimarucot, Et. Al., G.R. No.
202069, 7 March 2018
Rule 12. Bill of Particulars
Rule 13. Filing and Service of Pleadings, Judgments and Other
Papers
Rule 14. Summons
Rule 15. Motions
Week 5 Rule 17. Dismissal of Actions
13.Martinez v. Buen, G.R. No. 187342, 5 April 2017
14.Bank of the Philipppines v. Spouses Genuino, G.R. No.
208792 , 22 July 2015
Rule 18. Pre-Trial
15.Pimentel v. Adiao, G.R. No. 222678, 17 October 2018
16.Spouses Sergio C. Pascual v. First Consolidated Rural Bank
(Bohol), Inc., G.R. No. 202597, 8 February 2017
Rule 19.Intervention
17.Ongco v. Dalisay, G.R. No. 190810, 18 July 2012
18.Neptune Metal Scrap Recycling, Inc. v. Meralco, G.R. No.
204222, 4 July 2016,
19.Zosa v. Consilium, Inc. G.R. No. 196765, 19 September 2018
Rule 20. Calendar of Cases
Week 6 Rule 21.Subpoena
Rule 22. Computation of Time
20.Alfredo Jaca Montajes V. People Of The Philippines, G.R.
No. 183449 , 12 March 2012
Jaime Beltran Luz, V. National Amnesty Commission, G.R. No.
159708 , 24 September 2004
Rule 23. Depositions Pending Actions
Ingrid Sala Santamaria And Astrid Sala Boza V. Thomas Cleary,
G.R. No. 197122, June 15, 2016
Ng Meng Tam, V. China Banking Corporation, G.R. No.
214054, August 05, 2015
Roberto C. Martires V. Heirs Of Avelina Somera, G.R. 210789,
3 December 2018
People of the Philippines v. Maria Cristina P. Sergio and Julius
L. Lacanilao , G.R. No. 240053, 9 October 2019
Rule 24. Depositions Before Action or Pending Appeal
Rule 25. Interrogatories to Parties
Spouses Vicente Afulugencia And Leticia Afulugencia V.
Metropolitan Bank & Trust Co. And Emmanuel L. Ortega, G.R.
No. 185145 , 5 February 2014
Fortune Corporation V. Hon. Court Of Appeals And Inter-
Merchants Corporation, G.R. No. 108119 , 19 January 1994
Week 7 Rule 26. Admission by adverse party
Development Bank Of The Philippines v. Court Of Appeals,
G.R. No. 153034, 20 September 2005
Fortunata N. Duque, v. Court Of Appeals, G.R. No. 125383 , 2
July 2002
Concrete Aggregates Corporation v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
117574 2 January 1997
Rey Lañada v. Court Of Appeals , G.R. No. 102390 , 1
February 2002 and Nestle Philippines, Inc. and Francis
Santos v. Court of Appeals , G.R. No. 102404
Rule 27. Production Or Inspection Of Document Or Things
Eagleridge Development Corporation, Marcelo N. Naval and
Crispin I. Oben v. Cameron Granville 3 Asset Management,
Inc. G.R. No. 204700 , 10 April 2013
Solidbank Corporation, now known As Metropolitan Bank and
Trust Company v. Gateway Electronics Corporation, Jaime M.
Hidalgo and Israel Maducdoc, G.R. No. 164805, 30 April
2008
Rule 28. Physical And Mental Examination Of Persons
Chan v Chan.
Rule 29. Refusal to comply with modes of discovery
Rule 30. Trial
Week 8. Rule 31. Consolidation or Severance
Romulo L. Neri v. Sandiganbayan , G.R. No. 202243 , 7
August 2013
Rule 32. Trial by Commissioners
Dominador S. Asis v. Hon. Melquiades G. Ilao , et. al. , G.R. No.
L-17451, 31 January 1962
National Power Corporation v. Sps. Margarito Asoque and
Tarcinia Asoque, G.R. No. 172507, 14 September 2016
Rule 33. Demurrer to Evidence
Republic Of The Philippines v. Fe Roa Gimenez And Ignacio
B.Gimenez, G.R. No. 174673, 11 January 2016
BDO Unibank, Inc v. Antonio Choa, G.R. No. 237553, July 10,
2019.
Cabador v. People, G.R. No. 186001, 2 October 2009
Radiowealth Finance Company, Petitioner, v. Spouses Vicente
And Ma. Sumilang Del Rosario, G.R. No. 138739. , July 6, 2000,
GMA Network, Inc., Petitioner. V. Central Catv, Inc., G.R. No.
176694, 18 July 2014
Nilo Oropesa v. Cirilo Oropesa, G.R. No. 184528 , 25 April
2012
Rule 34. Judgment on the Pleadings
Asian Construction And Development Corporation V.
Sannaedle Co., Ltd., G.R. No. 181676, 11 June 2014
Iloilo Jar Corporation V. Comglasco Corporation Aguila Glass,
G.R. No. 219509, 18 January 2017
Fernando Medical Enterprises, Inc. V. Wesleyan University
Philippines, Inc., G.R. No. 207970, January 20, 2016
Rule 35. Summary Judgments
Wood Technology Corp. vs. Equitable Banking Corp. G.R. No.
153867, 17 February 2005
Adolfo vs. Adolfo , G.R. No. 201427, 18 March 2015
Week 9 Rule 36. Judgments, Final Orders, and Entry Thereof
Rule 37. New Trial or Reconsideration
Rule 38. Relief from Judgments, Orders or other proceedings
Madarang v. Spouses Morales , G.R. No. 199283 , 9 June
2014
Dr Lasam v. Philippine National Bank, G.R. No. 207433, 5
December 5 2018
Quelnan v. VHF Philippines, G.R. No. 138500, September 16,
2005
Basco v. Ca, G.R. No. 125290. August 9, 2000
Francisco v. Puno, G.R. No. L-55694, October 23, 1981
Rule 39. Execution, Satisfaction and Effect of Judgment
Villareal v. Metropolitan Waterworks And Sewerage System,
G.R. No. 232202, 28 February 2018.
SPECIAL LAWS:
Expedited Procedures in First Level Courts (A.M. No. 08-8-7-
SC) amending the 2016 Revised Rules of Procedure for Small
Claims as Amended and the Revised Rules on Summary
Procedure
Katarungang Pambarangay
A.M. No. 03-1-09-SC on the Guidelines to be observed by Trial
Court Judges and Clerks of Court in the Conduct of Pre-Trial
and the use of Deposition-Discovery Measures
A.M. No. 19-10-20-SC 2020 Guidelines for the Conduct of the
Court-Annexed Mediation (CAM) and Judicial Dispute
Resolution (JDR) in Civil Cases
Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 2004 (RA 9285)
A.M. No. 07-11-08-SC dated 10 October 2004 Special Rules of
Court on ADR
A.M. No. 11-9-4-SC, 13 November 012 on the Efficient Paper
Use Rule
Also include relevant legal forms
Note: Please read related cases on these topics. The Midterm
Examination and the Final Examination Weeks are not included in the
Schedule.