0% found this document useful (0 votes)
563 views12 pages

22061-Microproject-Construction Management Project

The document discusses the development of interlocking masonry bricks and their structural behavior. Various types of interlocking bricks have been developed over the past decades as an alternative to conventional bricks. Interlocking bricks are manufactured without mortar joints between layers, allowing for faster, easier, and less labor-intensive construction. Studies have shown that walls constructed with interlocking bricks can meet required strength standards and perform adequately under dynamic and seismic loading, making them suitable for load-bearing structures. Research continues to evaluate the mechanical properties and load capacities of walls built with different interlocking brick designs and compositions.

Uploaded by

aditya nimbalkar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Topics covered

  • load bearing,
  • building assembly,
  • construction labor,
  • testing methods,
  • manufacturing process,
  • image analysis,
  • digital image correlation,
  • research studies,
  • structural behavior,
  • construction research
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
563 views12 pages

22061-Microproject-Construction Management Project

The document discusses the development of interlocking masonry bricks and their structural behavior. Various types of interlocking bricks have been developed over the past decades as an alternative to conventional bricks. Interlocking bricks are manufactured without mortar joints between layers, allowing for faster, easier, and less labor-intensive construction. Studies have shown that walls constructed with interlocking bricks can meet required strength standards and perform adequately under dynamic and seismic loading, making them suitable for load-bearing structures. Research continues to evaluate the mechanical properties and load capacities of walls built with different interlocking brick designs and compositions.

Uploaded by

aditya nimbalkar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Topics covered

  • load bearing,
  • building assembly,
  • construction labor,
  • testing methods,
  • manufacturing process,
  • image analysis,
  • digital image correlation,
  • research studies,
  • structural behavior,
  • construction research

DEVELOPMENT OF INTERLOCKING MASONRY BRICKS AND ITS’ BEHAVIOUR

Ab

Conventional bricks are the most elementary building materials for houses construction.
However, the rapid growth in today’s construction industry has obliged the civil engineers in
searching for a new building technique that may result in even greater economy, more
efficient and durable as an alternative for the conventional brick. Moreover, the high
demands for having a speedy and less labour and cost building systems is one of the factor that
cause the changes of the masonry conventional systems. These changes have led to
improved constructability, performance, and cost as well. Several interlocking bricks has been
developed and implemented in building constructions and a number of researches had
studied the manufacturing of interlocking brick and its structural behaviour as load bearing
and non -load bearing element. This technical paper aims to review the development of
interlocking brick and its structural behaviour. In conclusion, the concept of interlocking system
has been widely used as a replacement of the conventional system where it has been utilized
either as load bearing or non-load bearing masonry system.

APC/CE-6I/2020-21 Page 1
DEVELOPMENT OF INTERLOCKING MASONRY BRICKS AND ITS’ BEHAVIOUR

CHAPTER NO 1

INTRODUCTION

Brick masonry is an ancient material and one of the most significant construction materials all
over theworld. The conventional techniques for bricks making has brought irrefutable
drawbacks

[1]. The ancient and conventional procedures of brick making were by mixing the raw
materials, muilding the bricks, and drying and firing them till they obtain a certain level of
strength.

[2] However, the manufacturing process of bricks on the last two decades trended to new
methods in order to reduce the shortcoming of the ancient methods of making bricks. Due to
the current trend within the last two decades, bricks have been developed in different
classifications namely solid brick and interlocking brick. The present of interlocking mortarless
brick work has prompted a huge increment in field profitability and effectiveness, and also a
diminishment in the prerequisites for very particular work teams. Besides, the utilization of
interlocking blocks work has increased fast prevalence in numerous inside nations as a
contrasting option to traditional blocks for supportable and sustainable buildings. Interlocking
blocks are unique in relation to conventional blocks since the absence of the mortar to he filled
between the blocks layers during the construction process, in light of this characteristic, the
way toward building walls and partitions is specdier and requires less skilled workers as the
blocks.

APC/CE-6I/2020-21 Page 2
DEVELOPMENT OF INTERLOCKING MASONRY BRICKS AND ITS’ BEHAVIOUR

CHAPTER NO. 2

Development of interlocking brick

Different types of interlocking blocks and bricks have been produced amid the previous years,
varying in the composition of material, dimension and shape, contingent upon the required
strengths and usage. These comprise of "Sparlock system, Meccano system, Sparfil system,
Haener system. Putra block system and the Solid Interlocking blocks (SIB) or Hydraform blocks",
which are a change over the conventional bricks and blocks

[1] that the various interlocking blocks based on materials are "soil-cement blocks, nee hush
ash cement blocks, and concrete blocks". The soil cement blocks depend on the soil and cement
qualities, the cement-to-soil ratio usually lies between 16 and 1:10, hy volume while the rice
hush ash (RHA) cement blocks, the cement to rice hush ash ratio is 1:4 by volume. Also, for the
concrete hlocks, the distinctive mix quantity of cement sand:gravel is 1:5:3.

[2] developed a mortariess interlocking soil-cement block for masonry construction. With the
appropriate block, the pressing mold was established and samples were adapted in 3 mixtures
of soil and cement displaying construction feasibility. In accordance to the related standards,
compression resistance, absorption of water and sizing were tested. The results revealed that
the absorption of water is the only parameter that mismatched with standards requirements.In
Malaysia.

APC/CE-6I/2020-21 Page 3
DEVELOPMENT OF INTERLOCKING MASONRY BRICKS AND ITS’ BEHAVIOUR

[3] developed interlocking load bearing hollow block system called PutraHlock. The blocks are
placed on each other and 30 interlocking projections are given in the face of theblocks to
incorporate the blocks into masonry systems. 21 different block models have been investigated
and analyzed with respect to weight, bearing and shear areas, shape, case of production, ability
to accommodate vertical and horizontal reinforcing stabilizing ties and efficiency of the
interlocking mechanism under imposed loads. As a result, the system developed provides a fast,
easy and an accurate building system Also in Malaysia.

[4] established other interlocking block (Figure 1), hused on the concept of LEGO). Individual
units and identical wall panels have been tested at Universiti Putra Malaysia under varies type
of leading. It has been concluded that the compressive strength of the blocks satisfies the
requirements of the Malaysian standards.

Figure 1. Interlocking Hollow Block System

APC/CE-6I/2020-21 Page 4
DEVELOPMENT OF INTERLOCKING MASONRY BRICKS AND ITS’ BEHAVIOUR

CHAPTER NO. 3

Structural Behaviour of Interlocking Brick Systems

evaluated the residual compressive and shear strengths of novel “coconut-fibre- reinforced-
concrete” (CFRC) interlocking blocks under dynamic loading. The study concluded that the
CFRC interlocking bricks have sufficient residual capacity after subjection to a dynamic loads
and 15 months of storage. Therefore, the structures of CFRC interlocking bricks have the
capability to sustain and be utilized continually after any seismic events, if the destruction and
harm in blocks are invisible.

Investigated the in plane behavior of the mortarless coconut fibre reinforced concrete
interlocking blocks structures undergone different dynamic loadings. The contents of coconut
fibre were 1% of concrete mass. Four structures elements were prepared (two columns and
two walls both with and without coconut fibre rope) and tested under push over, snap back,
impact, harmonic and earthquake loadings. It was demonstrated that the bending stiffness and
top displacement of the structures with fibre coconut rope were higher than those without
rope. At the same time, damping, energy dissipation, and base shear of the structures with rope
were smaller than those structures without rope. Therefore, the results confirmed that CFRC
interlocking blocks have the potential to be used in regions exposed to any seismic loadings.

Developed an interlocking brick system named Brickcool and then studied the structural
behavior of Brickcool walls as load bearing structure. In according to BS3921 and ASTMC67,
physical and mechanical tests of the brick unit (specifications, compression strength and
absorption of water) were conducted. Randomly 10 bricks unit were picked up and properly
cleaned and then undergone the specification test. The bricks were then laid in a row at the
same level. The units were then placed in the same level of row. Measurement tape was used
to dimension each brick. Same samples were immersed in clean water for twenty four hours
where the weight of the samples before and after immersing were recorded in order to
determine the water absorption. Compression test of ten interlocking bricks were conducted.

The results are shown in Table 1 and Table 2.

In this study, two specimens of load bearing interlocking Brickool wall dimensioned by 1300
mm in height, 1000 mm in length and 125 mm in width were constructed. The first specimen
was prepared with no reinforcement while the second specimen was strengthen with
reinforcement of T10 mm.

APC/CE-6I/2020-21 Page 5
DEVELOPMENT OF INTERLOCKING MASONRY BRICKS AND ITS’ BEHAVIOUR

Results showed that, the developed brick (Brickool) met the minimum values required by
British and American standards and can be used as load bearing with or without reinforcement.
However, at the top of the specimens, the failure load of wall specimen with bars has higher
value with lower displacementthan the wall specimen without bars. At the same time,
strengthening the wall by reinforcement result in high compression and tension strain.

Table 1. Specification & water absorption of interlocking Brickool.

examined the compressive strength of the wall made of concrete interlocking bricks with
mortar and non-mortar paste. Results showed that the compressive strength of concrete
interlocking bricks with or without mortar were satisfied the minimum compressive strength
required by BS3921:1985 which is 5.2 MPa for the conventional concrete blocks. He concluded
that the compressive strength of concrete interlocking bricks with mortar paste is higher than
the compressive strength of the conventional concrete blocks. Meanwhile, concrete
interlocking bricks increases the compressive strength by 30% when mortar paste was used.

APC/CE-6I/2020-21 Page 6
DEVELOPMENT OF INTERLOCKING MASONRY BRICKS AND ITS’ BEHAVIOUR

Investigated the behavior of interlocking masonry walls produced from cement, laterite soil and
sand. An experimental tests (physical properties, displacement, and compressive strength) for
block units and unreinforced wall panels were carried out under compression load at different
eccentricities as illustrated on Figure 2.

The results shown in Table 3 indicate that the block is classified as common brick in accordance
to BS 3921 and severe weathering grade in accordance to ASTM C62. The maximum
compressive stress of the unreinforced wall panel is 3.60 N/mm2 witch comply with the
requirement for residential building.

Table 3. Compressive strength test of interlocking masonry walls with different eccentricities

Compression test of ten interlocking bricks were conducted. The results are shown in Table I
and Table 2. In this study, two specimens of load bearing interlocking Brickool wall dimensioned
by 1300 mm in height, 1000 mm in length and 125 mm in width were constructed. The first
specimen was prepared with no reinforcement while the second specimen was strengthen with
reinforcement of T10 mm. Results showed that, the developed brick (Brickool) met the
minimum values required by British and American

APC/CE-6I/2020-21 Page 7
DEVELOPMENT OF INTERLOCKING MASONRY BRICKS AND ITS’ BEHAVIOUR

standards and can be used as Imad bearing with or without reinforcement. However, at the top
of the specimens, the failure load of wall specimen with bars has higher value with lower
displacement than the wall specimen without bars. At the same time, strengthening the wall by
reinforcement result in high compression and tension strain.

Behaviour of Contact Area Between Brick Layers Due to the absence of mortar and the filling
material between the masonry brick joints, the contact area need to be study with attention.
Also, the dry joint behavior is a vital design parameters that must be measured, for this reason
only compressibility of dry joint should be investigated. Previous studies has conducted tests to
determine the behavior of contact area between brick layers and its effects on the overall
behavior of masonry systems. Ayed et al. [17] used an image analysis method. A plain white
paper weighing 80 g/m² and free of physical or chemical effect on block has been used. The
interface of the interlocking blocks was painted and the white paper between the blocks were
placed to print the contact area (Figure 4). An image analysis was developed on MATLAB in
order to estimate the percentage of the contact surface printed on the paper. It transformed
the image of the printed paper in white and black pixels. Counting of pixels leads to the
percentage of the contact area.

Another recent study used Digital Image Correlation method to investigate the compressibility
of dry joints. Compressive tests on specimens that cut from Magnesia-Carbon mortarless bricks
were carried out. Tests were conducted using a load cell of 200 kN (Figure 5) with an accuracy
of 0.2% of the attained load and 0.0330 mm/minute displacement rate. 2-dimentical digital
image correlation was utilized to measure the dry joint behavior under compression

APC/CE-6I/2020-21 Page 8
DEVELOPMENT OF INTERLOCKING MASONRY BRICKS AND ITS’ BEHAVIOUR

Similarly, investigated the dry joint closure of the refractory bricks under compression. The
overall purpose of the test was to acquire data on the closure behavior of the dry bed joint
under compression load in order to get a clear image of the stress and the joint situation during
the furnace service cycle. Therefore, the joint closure behavior was monitored in-directly
through the compression of the samples with and without joints in extensive temperature
variety.

CHAPTER NO. 4

Behaviour of Contact Area Between Brick Layers

Due to the absence of mortar and the filling material between the masonry brick joints, the
contact area need to be study with attention. Also, the dry joint behavior is a vital design

APC/CE-6I/2020-21 Page 9
DEVELOPMENT OF INTERLOCKING MASONRY BRICKS AND ITS’ BEHAVIOUR

parameters that must be measured, for this reason only compressibility of dry joint should be
investigated. Previous studies has

conducted tests to determine the behavior of contact area between brick layers and its effects
on the overall behavior of masonry systems. Ayed et al. [17] used an image analysis method. A
plain white paper weighing 80 g/m2 and free of physical or chemical effect on block has been
used. The interface of the interlocking blocks was painted and the white paper between the
blocks were placed to print the contact area (Figure 4). An image analysis was developed on
MATLAB in order to estimate the
percentage of the contact surface printed on the paper. It transformed the image of the printed
paper in white and black pixels. Counting of pixels leads to the percentage of the contact area.

Another recent study done by Rekik et al. [18] used Digital Image Correlation method to
investigate the compressibility of dry joints. Compressive tests on specimens that cut from
Magnesia-Carbon mortarless bricks were carried out. Tests were conducted using a load cell of
200 kN (Figure 5) with an accuracy of 0.2 % of the attained load and 0.0330 mm/minute
displacement rate. 2-dimentioal digital image correlation was utilized to measure the dry joint
behavior under compression. Similarly, Andreev et al. [19] investigated the dry joint closure of
the refractory bricks under compression. The overall purpose of the test was to acquire data on
the closure behavior of the dry bed
joint under compression load in order to get a clear image of the stress and the joint situation
during the furnace service cycle. Therefore, the joint closure behavior was monitored in-directly
through the compression of the samples with and without joints in extensive temperature
variety.

CHAPTER NO. 5

Conclusion

In conclusion, the interlocking brick development is presented in this study and confirmed that
this system is utilized in masonry structures. Accordingly, the concept of interlocking system
APC/CE-6I/2020-21 Page 10
DEVELOPMENT OF INTERLOCKING MASONRY BRICKS AND ITS’ BEHAVIOUR

has been widely used as a replacement of the conventional system. It can be concluded that
the shape of the interlocking brick varies with simplicity which result in casy and fast production
and assembly in the masonry systems. Moreover, the interlocking mechanism of all the
different types of interlocking bricks is sufficient to interlock the assembled bricks in different
directions. Based on the researches of the structural behavior of interlocking bricks, it can be
concluded that the interlocking blocks have met the minimum specifications and requirements
as per British and American Standards. Also, it verified that interlocking brick can be utilized
either as load bearing wall or non-load bearing system.

References

[1] Shakir AA and Mohammed AA 2013 Manufacturing of Bricks in the Past, in the Present and
in the Future: A state of the Art Review Int. J. Adv. Appl. Sci 2 145-56

[2] Allen E and Thallon R 2011 Fundamentals of residential construction (John Wiley & Sons)
131 Irwan J. Zamer M and Othman N 2016 A Review on Interlocking Compressed Earth Blocks
APC/CE-6I/2020-21 Page 11
DEVELOPMENT OF INTERLOCKING MASONRY BRICKS AND ITS’ BEHAVIOUR

(ICER) with Addition of Bacteria. In: MATEC Web of Conf.: EDP Sciences) pp (0-5 141 Korany Y
and Humphrey S 2010 Proc. of the 2nd Masonry Mini Symp

[3] Anand K and Ramamurthy K 2005 Development and evaluation of hollow concrete
interlocking

[4] block masonry system Masonry Soc. J. 23 11-9 Khan S S and Deshmukh A S 2015 Mortarless
Masonry with Interlocking Blocks In: J. Res. Eng. Sci. Technol. 1 314-9 Fay L, Cooper P and de
Morais H F 2014 Innovative interlocked soil-cement block for the

construction of masonry to eliminate the settling mortar Constr Build. Mater 32 391-5 Thanoon
W A, Jaafar M S. Abdul Kadir MR, Abang Ali A A, Trikha D N and Najm AMS 2004 Development
of an innovative interlocking load bearing hollow block system in Malaysia Constr. Build. Mater

APC/CE-6I/2020-21 Page 12

Common questions

Powered by AI

The development and implementation of interlocking brick systems face challenges such as ensuring precise manufacturing to meet specific shape and size requirements critical for proper interlocking . Achieving consistent material quality is essential, as variations can affect the structural integrity and durability of the bricks . Another challenge is the thorough testing required to confirm that these systems meet all relevant standards under various conditions, including different load scenarios and environmental factors . Additionally, adapting these systems to existing building codes and ensuring that construction practices can incorporate such innovative technologies without extensive retraining of the workforce pose further challenges .

Interlocking brick design plays a vital role in both the ease of construction and the structural performance of masonry systems. The design allows for mortarless construction, simplifying the process and reducing labor requirements . Designs vary in shape and size, allowing for a wide range of applications from load-bearing to facade cladding . Due to the precise shape, the bricks can interlock securely, distributing loads more evenly and improving seismic and dynamic load performance . The diverse designs also accommodate reinforcements or use of alternative materials like coconut fibers, further enhancing structural resilience .

To measure the structural performance of interlocking bricks, physical and mechanical tests including compression strength and water absorption tests were conducted according to standards like BS3921 and ASTMC67 . Digital Image Correlation was used to analyze dry joint behavior under compression, while structural elements like walls and columns were tested under various dynamic loads . These tests found that interlocking bricks meet or exceed the standards set for conventional bricks, showing improved performance in terms of compression strength and structural stability . Interlocking bricks also demonstrated potential for increased compressive strength, particularly when used with mortar paste, which enhanced their load-bearing capabilities significantly .

Different materials used in interlocking bricks significantly affect their structural performance. Soil-cement blocks depend on the soil and cement qualities, with ratios that tailor the block for specific strength requirements . Rice husk ash cement blocks offer a lightweight alternative with acceptable load-bearing capacities due to their composition . Concrete blocks provide high compressive strengths, which can outperform traditional blocks, particularly when interlocking designs allow for an increased load distribution across the structure . The specific material composition determines the compressive strength, water absorption, and durability characteristics, which are critical for the suitability of bricks for various construction environments .

The interlocking mechanism is crucial in providing stability and load distribution in masonry systems. By eliminating the need for mortar, interlocking bricks rely on their shape and configuration to lock together securely, which enhances facade integrity and load-bearing capabilities . This mechanism allows for the assembly of bricks in multiple directions without the need for complex reinforcement strategies, leading to faster and more cost-effective construction . It also ensures a high degree of alignment accuracy, improving the overall durability and performance of the structure, particularly under dynamic loads .

The development of interlocking bricks has addressed traditional brick-making shortcomings by introducing the use of alternative materials like soil-cement, rice hush ash cement, and concrete blocks, which provide different ratios and strengths for various applications . Additionally, interlocking bricks eliminate the need for mortar, reducing dependency on skilled labor and enabling faster construction processes . These bricks are manufactured to precise shapes and dimensions, which simplifies construction and enhances structure stability compared to conventional processes .

Reinforcement in interlocking brick walls significantly enhances their structural performance. Even without mortar, reinforcement can increase the load-bearing capacities of interlocking systems by providing extra stability . Experiments show that walls reinforced with T10 mm bars experienced higher failure loads and lower displacement compared to non-reinforced counterparts, indicating improved structural performance under stress . Reinforcement can also improve compression and tension strain values, proving beneficial in environments with high dynamic loads or seismic activity, ensuring reliability and structural integrity .

Interlocking masonry bricks offer several advantages over conventional brick systems including increased construction speed and reduced labor costs due to their mortarless design . They improve constructability, performance, and cost, as they do not require highly skilled work teams and allow for speedy assembly . The interlocking mechanism enhances the stability of the masonry structure, potentially offering better load-bearing capabilities and improved performance under dynamic loads . Furthermore, interlocking bricks have met the minimum specifications as per British and American Standards, making them a reliable alternative for load-bearing or non-load bearing systems .

The absence of mortar in interlocking brick systems necessitates a focus on the behavior of dry joints as they become crucial to the system's integrity. Dry joints rely on the accurate alignment and interlocking of bricks to transmit loads across masonry systems . Studies utilizing image analysis and Digital Image Correlation methods have demonstrated that dry joints must be engineered to withstand compression and maintain joint integrity under varying temperature and load conditions . The precise interlocking designs must compensate for the lack of the typical adhesion that mortar provides, ensuring that bricks remain securely interlocked .

The development of interlocking masonry bricks has improved construction efficiency by eliminating the need for mortar between bricks, which speeds up the building process and reduces labor costs. The interlocking mechanism simplifies alignment and stability, allowing for rapid assembly. This system requires less skilled labor compared to traditional bricklaying, enhancing productivity and reducing the overall cost of construction .

You might also like