Revision Book PDF
Revision Book PDF
Psychology
Edexcel 9-1
Revision Guide
1
CONTENTS PAGE
Topic 1: Development………………………………………………………..3-17
Topic 2: Memory……………………………………………………………….18-24
Topic 3: Psychological Problems……………………………….……..25-39
Topic 4: The Brain and Neuropsychology………….……………..40-52
Topic 5: Social Influence……………………………………………………53-61
Topic 6: Criminal Psychology…………………………………………….62-72
Topic 7: The Self………………………………………………………………..73-86
Topic 11: Research Methods…………………………….………………87-100
2
+=☺
3
Topic 1: DEVELOPMENT
Colour Key
General information and good
studies to learn
Key Studies you must learn
Situational Factors
Personality Factors
Key terms:
• Brain: the organ in your head made up from nerves that process information and control behaviour
• Forebrain: the anterior part of the brain, including the hemisphere and central brain structures (forms
when foetus is 3 weeks)
• Midbrain: the middle section of the brain forming part of the central nervous system (forms when foetus is
3 weeks)
• Hindbrain: the lower part of the brain that includes the cerebellum, pons and medulla (forms when foetus
is 3 weeks)
• Cerebellum: an area of the brain near to the brainstem that controls motor movements (muscle activity)
(develops when foetus is 6 weeks)
• Anterior: directed towards the front
• Posterior: directed towards the back:
• Medulla: connections the upper brain to the spinal cord and controls automatic responses (develops when
foetus is 20 weeks)
• Involuntary response: a response to a stimulus that occurs without someone making a conscious choice.
They are automatic such as reflexes
• Neural connections: links formed by messages passing from one nerve cell (neuron) to another.
Infants use their senses and movements to get information about the world
Sensorimotor
Stage (0-2 years) Live in the present rather than understanding time and space
Learn by linking what they see, hear, touch, taste of smell to objects they are using
6 months: develop objective permanence which means they learn that objects exist
even if they can’t see them anymore
4 months: children repeat actions such as dropping something deliberately that they first
dropped by chance
Children see the world through their own eyes, not through someone else's
(they are egocentric)
Start of reasoning
Ask questions
Children do not realise that changing how something looks does not change its
volume, size or weight
Irreversibility: child not being able to use thought to reverse events such as
knowing that is water from a wide glass is poured into a tall glass so it looks
as if there is more water, then the water is poured back into the wide glass it
will look the same
Children begin to apply rules and strategies to help their thinking and use concrete
Concrete objects to aid their understanding
Operational Stage
(7-12years) They have difficulty with abstract ideas such as morality
5
Classification: naming and identifying objects
Reversibility: if they know two bricks plus four is six bricks they will know
that six minus two is four bricks
Conservation: they know that size can remain even if it looks different in a
different scenario
Have the ability to think about how time changes things (as they get older they may
move house)
They can also understand that events have a sequence such as moving from school to
college then to work
Young person can see that actions have consequences – can understand why we don’t
drink and drive
• They cannot do certain things until they reach the appropriate stage of development
• Young children are egocentric and cannot understand the teachers point of view so might not do
as they are told because of a lack of understanding
• Children build their own schemas (knowledge of the world) from their own experiences and so
they individually build their own knowledge and understanding
• There should be a focus on the child’s thinking and not what they can do but the process
• Children are individuals and go through the stages in different ways so classrooms must
differentiate for that
6
• As they develop, babies have to understand many new things, this is done by forming ideas about
how things are in the world
• Their ideas take the form of schemas or plans through which they represent the world
• However as they experience more, they need to change their schemas and create new
• Intelligence is acquired through stages of development such as developing object permanence and
formal reasoning
• Intelligence is developed through building schemas via adaptation and through the four stages of
development
Meaning Example
Schemas/schemata Plans and patterns are formed A student has a classroom schema.
about what we experience. Upon entering a classroom, they
Mental structures give us would expect to see a board for
frameworks to understand the writing on, some chairs and tables,
world. a desk at the front and some fire
safety instructions
Assimilation Incorporating new ideas into A young child develops a schema for
existing schemas birds flying and, seeing an
aeroplane, calls it a bird.
Accommodation A schema no longer works and The child will see that bird alive
has to be changed to deal with and aeroplanes are not, and so they
a new experience. will be to change their ‘everything
that flies is a bird’ schema.
Strengths Weaknesses
• Practical application. Discovery learning draws • Studies have found that children can do things
on Piaget’s ideas about focusing on the earlier than Piaget thought which challenges his
individual. ideas
• Generated lots of research including • Did not look at the influence of social
experiments to show the existence of the stages interactions or cultural setting
and how children build knowledge through • Dasen 1994 found that Aboriginal children
creating schemas developed the ability to conserve at a later
• There is research to support his ideas stage than Piaget’s Swiss sample did
• Piaget used interviews and observations –
what’s an issue with this? Subjectivity and
validity
7
Fixed and growth mindset: ability and effort
• Mindset is the set of beliefs we all have about our ability to succeed in education and other areas
• Understanding mindset theory is important because children’s educational achievements can influence their
future and their mindset can be improved to affect achievement in a positive way
• Mindset theory suggests that children who think they can improve will continue to put in effort (growth
mindset)
• Those who think they can’t improve will stop trying (fixed mindset)
• Dweck has focused on helping students to achieve more, specifically by considering how praise affects
children’s development
• If a child is praised for good work then this can do some good
• If a child is not praise the child may assume they don’t have the ability and conclude that it is pointless
• It is better to praise children as they can then believe they can achieve
• Children can develop a fixed mindset about a particular ability they think they don’t have and give up (like
some of you in Psychology) which can mean they stop taking on challenges and stop trying
• Teachers also have fixed or growth mindsets which affect how they respond to a child as they may assume
that a child lacks ability and gives up on them
Experimental Evidence
• In one of Dweck’s experiments it was found that praising students ability led them to a fixed mindset and
they were vulnerable to issues such as coping with setbacks
• In contrast, praising effort or use of strategy taught a growth mindset, leading to students persevering
more
• Yeager and Dweck 2012 studied over 1500 students and found that low-achieving students who learned to
use a growth mindset did better compared to a control group who did not have that learning.
Strengths Weaknesses
• Practical application: Teachers and parents can • Most studies have artificial setting so lacks
focus on praise ecological validity
• Positive theory which helps society as it shows • Do they focus too much on the individual child
change is possible instead of poor teaching quality
• Evidence to support: Yeager and Dweck 2012 • Praise is not always appropriate and does not
found that adolescents could deal better with feature in feedback when there is no
not fitting in if they had a growth mindset judgement on the individual for example “add a
conclusion to an essay”
• Gunderson 2013 used a natural environment so
the findings are more valid
8
Willingham’s Learning Theory
Building knowledge
• Short-term memory involves practise so we have to rehearse what is to be remembered
• What is learned then goes into the LTM where material have to be reviewed and practised to remember it
• When there is enough practice and effort we can stop so it is unlikely to be forgotten
• Can do quizzes to help build knowledge and practice it
Building Skill
• Problem-solving and creative thinking are skills a student needs to learn and these skills use working
memory
• Skills need to be developed so that they become automatic and use little space in working memory
• Reading becomes automatic once there has been enough practice and effort
9
Strengths Weaknesses
• Applied to education and other situations to • High control – low ecological validity
promote child development • No emphasis on the importance of individual
• Other studies to support Willingham and his differences
arguments against Piaget’s view that
development is in stages
• Repacholi and Gopnik’s 1997 study provides
experimental support showing that young
children were not as egocentric as Piaget
thought
• High control – high reliability
• Come from science and neuroscience
• A young child in the pre-operational stage sees the world from their own viewpoint and
cannot see someone else view point
• Piaget called this inability, egocentrism
• Children focus on themselves
• They are likely to change how things look in their own minds so that the world matches
how they see it
• The understanding that there are viewpoints other than their own is something that
develops over time
• This is when child decentre
• The three mountains task is part of a series of experiments that Piaget and Inhelder
carried our to study children’s ways of look at the world
• All children would see a mountain and on different sides they would have different views
of each mountain
• To find out the extent to which children of different ages were able to take the view of
another person
• Children’s overall system of putting together a number of different views of what they
see
10
• 100 children
• Equipment:
– Three models of mountains using paper pasted together to form card
– 1 metre and ranged from 12-30cm high.
– Lowest mountain was green with a small path winding down, next was brown and
had a red cross on the top and the highest with grey with snow on top
– Ten pictures of the three mountains were taken from different positions around it
(features visible)
– 3 pieces of card the same colour as the mountains which the child could arrange to
represent the mountains according to viewpoints
– Wooden doll about 3cm high with no facial features
• Ways of questioning the child
– Child asked to use the cardboard shapes to show how the mountain scene looked
from different viewpoints. Asked to place the shaped to show the view they
themselves saw and then to show what the doll could see
– The child was shown ten pictures of the model and asked to pick out the picture
that represented what they could see and what the doll could see
– The child chose a picture and then had to positive the doll so it could see that
viewpoint
• Pre-operational stage
– Asked 4-6.5 chooses pictures and places cardboard to show their own view of the 3
mountains model even asked to show the doll’s view
• Concrete operational stage
– From 7-9 the child understand others looking from different positions and can see
the model differently
– By 9-10 years old the children can understand that the doll has a different view
11
• Piaget and Inhelder concluded that children up to about 7 years were egocentric – could
not see from another viewpoint but their own
• Older children were not egocentric
• Older children can build mental representations of how others see the world
Strengths Weaknesses
● Provided detail in the form of qualitative data • Doesn’t support the idea of distinct stages but
and strong results, in addition to counting the rather than children develop progressively as
number of errors, they looked into the detail of they age instead – Piaget admits the stages are
the errors and what each child did and said fluid
• Experimental methods: control, standardisation, • Other studies use more realistic scenarios and
reliability found different findings: Use the iPads to
• Repeating the experiment with many children: research the study of Borke (1975) with Sesame
reliability Stree and Repachloi and Gopnik (1997) study
• Children didn’t understand the point of the task
• Originally done only in Switzerland
• Parents can praise a child personally, praise child’s behaviour or they can use a different type of praise
– Person praise seems to lead children to the idea that they are born with or without an ability. This
leads to a fixed theory known as entity theory or entity motivational framework where they might
not try hard as they think they aren’t good
– Process praise involves praising behaviour and effort leads children to see a link between effort and
success. They are more likely to see ability as changeable and are more likely to keep doing better
(Incremental theory or incremental motivational framework)
– Boys tend to think of ability and behaviour as changeable (incremental) suggesting that they
receive process praise
– Praise for girls is more likely to lead to entity theory meaning behaviour is seen as fixed, more
person praise
Research has shown that the way parents praise their young children impacts a child’s later ideas about reasons for
behaviour and beliefs
• It is found that praising children’s effort rather than their ability leads to the idea that working hard can
change achievements
• Gunderson et al 2013 set out to see whether looking at parents praising children in the home – a natural
setting – would support these experimental findings
• Researchers looked for a relationship between older children who believed effort was worthwhile as they
were receiving process praise both when they were answering questions about intelligence and when
answering questions about moral thinking
12
• Followed children at 14 months, 26 months, 38 months and then 5 years later too
• 29 boys and 24 girls
• 64% were white, 17% African-American, 11% Hispanic and 8% multicultural
• No participants or experimenters knew that praise was being studied, they thought the study was about
language development
• At each visit, participants were told to go about a typical day at home, interactions video-taped in 90
minute sessions.
• At 7-8 years the same children answer 2 questionnaires about what they thought led to a person’s
intelligence and what led people to act morally
• 18 items were covered about what underpins intelligence and 6 items about their beliefs for ‘good’ and
‘bad’
• Relationship found between parents use of process praise and a child’s later use of incremental
motivational framework
• Study’s aims were only partly supported because they did not show that parental use of person praise led to
entity motivational framework (fixed ability)
• There are gender differences in praise
Strengths Weaknesses
Morality: proper behaviour, people should behave according to principles of what is right and wrong, separating
good behaviour from bad behaviour
13
Theories of moral development (1): Piaget’s 1932 theory of moral development:
15
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
What early brain development would be expected in the first 3 months of pregnancy?
(4 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Piaget
Nicole’s family have two pet cats. One day, when Nicole is in the park with her mum, she points to a
dog and says ‘cat’. Why might Nicole think that the dog is a cat?
(2 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
16
Nicole can recognise her mother’s blue car as a ‘car’ and her father’s green car as a ‘car’. Her
grandmother had a red car, but buys a white car. Explain which process will Nicole use to understand
the change in her grandmother’s car?
(4 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Nicole’s grandfather sells his car and buys a motorbike. Which process will Nicole use to understand
the change in her grandfather’s vehicle?
(4 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
17
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Topic 2: MEMORY
18
Processes of memory
2. Encoding Turning sensory information into a form that can be used and stored by the
brain. Acoustic – holding sound. Visual – holding images. Semantic – holding
the meaning of information
3. Storage The retention of information in our memory system
Information can be forgotten through a process called displacement; this is when new incoming information pushes
out older information as we exceed the capacity of our short-term memory. In our long-term memory, memories
can decay, as they are not used, or they may be overwritten by new information, this is called interference, or in
the case of retrieval failure, we cannot find a memory as we may have lost the link
Role of rehearsal – Repeating information over and over again helps to hold it in our short-term memory; if it is
rehearsed for long enough it goes into our long-term memory. Rehearsal refers to repeating things out loud or over
and over again on our heads
Long-term memory – It can hold information indefinitely and is potentially limitless. Long-term memories are
mainly thought to be semantically encoded.
Strengths Weaknesses
1. There is a lot of evidence to support it. 1. It has been criticised for overstating the
Amnesia patients support the idea of role of rehearsal.
separate memory stores. 2. It is unlikely that we only have one type of
2. Ben Murdock (1962) in his primacy and long-term memory; this is shown in
recency experiments supported the amnesia patients.
separate memory stores.
19
Amnesia
Retrograde amnesia – When a patient has suffered a brain injury and cannot remember information from before
the injury. It can be specific to one memory, such as the incident, or a timeframe. In severe cases people forget
there name or where they come from. It is possible to people to regain all or some of their memory loss.
Anterograde amnesia – When you can’t store any new long-term memories. The short-term memory remains intact
so sensory information can be processed, but memories will not last beyond a few minutes as information cannot be
transferred, long-term memories before the incident are usually retained.
Schemas
Schemas are formed throughout our lives through personal experiences, this means they are unique and personal to
use. Bartlett discovered that schemas could influence memory as they can ignore and change details. Bartlett
found that recall displayed;
● Omissions - Leaving out unfamiliar, irrelevant or unpleasant details, our schema simplifies the information
● Transformations - Details are changed to make them more familiar and rational
● Familiarisation - We change unfamiliar details to align our own schema
Strengths Weaknesses
1. It has real-world practical applications, it 1. His data is subjective, he read and
can be used for eyewitnesses for crimes. interpreted each story himself.
2. His finding are ecologically valid, he did 2. Bartlett was not particularly scientific in
recall tests of stories hours, days and years his methods, he was interested in each
later. person’s unique memories rather than
using standardised procedure and controls.
● Rationalism - We add details into our recall to give a reason for something that may not have originally
fitted with a schema
20
Bartlett (1932) War of the Ghosts
Background
In his book, remembering Bartlett wrote about an experiment he conducted with folk stories and pictures. There
was a North American folk tale called ‘War of the Ghosts’. Bartlett chose this as the story would be unfamiliar to
Cambridge University staff and students so would support reconstructive theory as participants would be more
likely to draw on their own schemas.
Aim
To investigate whether the memory of a story is affected by previous knowledge. To find out if cultural background
and unfamiliarity with a story would lead to distortion of memory when it was recalled. To test if memory is
reconstructive and whether people store and retrieve information per expectations formed by cultural schemas.
Procedure
Sample: 20 British participants (7 women, 13 men). The participants were not told the aim of the study; they
believed they were being tested on the accuracy of recall. Bartlett used repeated reproduction, which is where
participants hear a story or see a drawing and are asked to reproduce it after a short time and then to do so again
over a period of days, weeks, months or years. The story used was a Native American story called ’The War of the
Ghosts’ which was unfamiliar to participants and contained unknown names and concepts. The story content was
also unfamiliar. The story was selected because it would test how memory may be reconstructed based on cultural
schema. Each participant read the story to themselves twice. The first reproduction happened 15 minutes later.
There was no set interval beyond this and participants recalled the story at further intervals from 20 hours to
almost 10 years.
Results
Bartlett found that participants changed the story as they tried to remember it. This happened in the early stages
(15 minutes) and throughout the further reproductions. Overall, the participants preserved the order of events and
main themes in the story. The reproduction of style was often changed, with reproduction of the story often being
transformed. Seven of the 20 participants omitted the title and 10 of the participants transformed the title – for
example, ‘War-Ghost Story’. Other transformations included changing ‘canoes’ to ‘boats’ and changing the names
of the characters. Much of the content was rationalised by the participants, who changed material so that it was
more acceptable to them (Bartlett called this ‘effort after meaning
Conclusion
Accuracy in reproduction of the story is an exception rather than a norm of memory. Style, rhythm and precise
story construction is very rarely reproduced. After repeated reconstructions, the form of, and items within, the
story become stereotyped and do not change much after this occurs. However, with infrequent reproduction,
omission of detail, simplification and transformation continues indefinitely. There is a significant amount of
interference with the story from reconstructing it. The details are altered to fit the participant’s own tendencies
and interests. In all recollections of the story, rationalisation reduced material to a form that was more accessible
or common to the participant. This could be because the material was initially connected to something else in
memory and treated as a representation of this. It reflected the character and individuality of the person recalling
the story, and names, places.
Strengths Weaknesses
● Using a story makes it a more naturalistic ● The story was illogical and not familiar,
test of recall, it is better than nonsense remembering the story is not an everyday
lists. task.
● It is reliable, Bartlett repeated the ● It lacked some control, Bartlett did not
experiment with various stories and found always give people the same time interval
the same results. before recalling the story
21
Peterson & Peterson (1959) Short-term Retention of Individual Verbal Items
Background
Lloyd and Margaret Peterson conducted a laboratory experiment to investigate the duration of short-term memory.
As we can hold information in the short-term memory by rehearsing it over and over, they could only test the
duration of a short-term memory trace by interfering with this rehearsal process. To prevent participants from
rehearsing, the Petersons got them to count backwards in threes.
Aim
Peterson and Peterson first aimed to see if retention of items was affected by interference during recall intervals.
In the second part of their study, they investigated whether silent or vocal rehearsal would affect recall of items.
Sample: 24 students from an introductory psychology course at Indiana University, USA were selected. As part of
their course, the students were required to take part in research experiments. Each participant was given a
standardised set of instructions which explained the process of the experiment. This included explaining the ‘black
box’ in front of them and what to do at each of the light signals:
∙ The green light meant that the trial was ready to begin.
∙ The red light meant to stop counting and recall the trigram (three-letter consonant).
Participants had two practice trials in order to ensure the instructions had been fully understood.
At the beginning of each trial, the experimenter would spell out a trigram followed by a number from which the
participant had to count backwards in either 3’s or 4’s, e.g. CHJ 506. In half the trials, participants counted
backwards in 3’s (e.g. 506, 503, 500 and so on) and in the other half they counted backwards in 4’s (e.g. 312, 308,
304 and so on).
Participants counted backwards in time with the ticking of a metronome. This was a task that would minimise
rehearsal behaviour between presentation and recall. Once the red light came on, the participant had to
immediately verbally recall the trigram, e.g. CHJ. The next trial would then begin 15 seconds later, signalled by the
green light. The responses given by the participant during their 15 second interval were recorded.
Each participant was tested eight times at each of the following six recall intervals: 3 seconds, 6 seconds, 9
seconds, 12 seconds, 15 seconds and 18 seconds.
Results
Results indicated that participants took an average of 2.83 seconds to begin their recall of the trigram once their
counting had stopped. There was a significant difference between accurate recall following the first blocks (shorter
interference intervals) than the last blocks (longer interference intervals). With a 3 second interference interval,
participants could recall just over 50% of the trigrams accurately. This dropped to less than 10% from 15 seconds
onwards.
Conclusion
Information decays rapidly from short-term memory, with accurate recall of the trigrams decreasing rapidly over
the duration of 18 seconds, and very little accuracy shown in recall in 15 second and 18 second trials. Therefore,
short-term memory has limited duration.
22
Sample: 48 students from the same university programme. In this procedure, half of the participants were
instructed to repeat the stimulus of a three-letter trigram aloud in time with a metronome. This group was the
‘vocal’ condition. They were then stopped by the experimenter and instructed to count backwards from a number.
The other half of the participants were not instructed to repeat the stimulus trigram aloud, but they were given
interval time before being asked to count backwards from a number. This group was the ‘silent’ group.
Both groups were tested on various rehearsal interval periods of immediate recall, 1 second and 3 seconds. This
was completed for three interference conditions of counting backwards for 3 seconds, 9 seconds and 18 seconds.
Results
Participant recall in the ‘vocal’ group improved with repetition, with longer repetition leading to more accurate
recall. Participant recall in the ‘silent’ group did not improve with longer repetition.
Conclusion
Only in conditions where the repetition was vocal and controlled did accuracy of recall improve. The rate of
forgetting from short-term memory depends on the amount of rehearsal undertaken.
Evaluation
Strengths Weaknesses
● It had good control as fixed timings were ● Extraneous variables, the trigram may
used and researchers eliminated any have a personal meaning to a person, this
background noise is hard to control
● It has practical implications, it teaches ● This is not realistic to how we use our
how interference in the form of verbal everyday memory
distraction can affect our ability to retain
information
Reductionism: the theory of explaining something according to its basic constituent parts
Reductionist: the practice of reductionism
An example of a reductionist approach to memory is the Multi-store model of memory
Reductionism
● Human behaviour or cognitive (thought) processes can be explained by looking at the parts that make up
that behaviour.
● Scientists often reduce complex behaviour into basic parts this means that we can be more certain that one
thing causes another (easier to measure).
For example, if we explain aggression as a result of a certain gene, we can test for the gene and see if it is
associated with someone being more aggressive than a person without that gene.
● Reductionism is associated with scientific methods (e.g. laboratory experiments), where factors that may
explain a behaviour can be isolated and tested under controlled conditions.
● Reductionism is a desirable scientific practice.
● However, the problem with reductionism is that it can result in an explanation that is overly simplistic.
Holism
● The opposite of reductionism.
● Tries to understand the whole behaviour rather than its parts.
● Believe that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.
● Uses qualitative methods to gain greater insight into the causes of behaviour
23
For example, a cake can be described by a list of ingredients that went into making it. Each ingredient
contributed to the taste, texture and smell of the cake. However, you would need all the ingredients working
together, interacting during the baking, to make the cake, otherwise it would not work.
● Difficult to achieve because understanding the whole individual means investigating lots of variables at the
same time.
● Regarded as unscientific because the findings can only apply to a particular individual and the resulting
theories do not apply to everyone else.
The area of cognitive psychology concerned with memory is generally regarded to be reductionist
Reductionist Holistic
The information processing approach Reconstructive memory
The Multi-store Model of Memory Qualitative analysis
Experiments
Atkinson & Schiffrin’s (1968) Multi-store Model of Memory can be seen as reductionist as it describes our memory as
a series of component memory stores with specific functions, such as rehearsal. Research, such as experiments can
be considered reductionist as experiments isolate variables without considering other factors.
However, Bartlett’s work cannot be considered reductionist because of the way he conducted his research. Bartlett
used qualitative analysis to explore the reconstructive nature of memory by understanding how individual schemas
influenced their recall of stories and pictures. He spent time establishing the character and backgrounds of his
participants in order to understand how their schemas were formed.
Structure and process of memory and information processing: Features of STM and LTM:
Rhianna is read a list of 11 items to buy from the shop for her mum. When her Mum finishes reading
the list of items to her, Rhianna has forgotten the first three items on the list. Why might Rhianna
have forgotten the first three items?
(4 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
When Rhianna arrives at the shop, she can only recall eight of the items on the list. According to the
multi-store model of memory, why might Rhianna only be able to remember eight of these items?
(2 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
24
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
25
Topic 3: PSYCHOLOGICAL PROBLEMS
Unipolar depression
• Describes the type of depression that most people are familiar with
• Different to bipolar disorder where patients have mood swings and are pulled in multiple directions
• International Classification of Diseases version 10 (ICD-10) says that unipolar depression is also known as
depressive episodes
• These affect how people feel and unipolar depression makes people feel low
• For a diagnosis of unipolar depression the ICD-10 requires that at least one of these main symptoms
(lowering mood, lack of energy and lack of motivation) occurs most of the time on most days for at least 2
weeks
Mild Four symptoms displayed A patient might find their symptoms upsetting
but they will probably be able to carry on with
most day-to-day activities
Moderate Five or six symptoms displayed A patient might have serious problems doing
day-to-day activities such as going to work or to
school
Severe Seven or more symptoms plus general A patient may have suicidal thoughts or engage
feelings of worthlessness in self-harm to cope with their feelings
26
• More people are diagnosed nowadays
• Seligman 1988 reported that in 1980s people were 10 times more likely to be diagnosed with
depression than they were in the 1940s
• The King’s Fund in 2008 reported on mental health and estimated that by 2026, 1.45 million
people will be diagnosed with depression compared to 1.24 million in 2007
• Is it because people are more aware nowadays?
• Hidaka 2012 suggests that modern living is just more stressful – how is this so?
Individuals Society
27
Strengths Weaknesses
Strengths Weaknesses
- Takes into account life events - Difficult to tell whether the irrational thoughts
- Combines nature and nurture are a cause of the depression or a symptom
- Applied to therapy (CBT) - Is there always an activating event
Strengths Weaknesses
• These drugs work by raising the levels of neurotransmitters such as serotonin and noradrenaline which are
thought to play a role in our mood
• Not all drugs used to treat depression work in the same way
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) Serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors
• These block the reuptake of serotonin when it (SNRIs)
is released from a neuron • Similar effect to SSRIs but they block the
• So serotonin can be available for longer reuptake of both serotonin and noradrenaline
• So there is more opportunity for other neurons (and norepinephrine)
to absorb it which should increase levels in the • This helps to improve mood too
brain and improving mood
29
Strengths Weaknesses
• Psychological problem where people feel they have to do something to avoid negative feelings
• People with addictions often have symptoms of withdrawal if they cannot have or do what they are
addicted to
• Withdrawal symptoms can make the person feel so bad that they believe they have to take or do the thing
they are addicted to feel normal again
• ICD-10 refers to addiction as a dependence disorder because the body depends on the substance in order to
feel normal
• You must have at least three of the symptoms at the same time for 1 month or for repeated occasions
over a year
Symptoms:
• Stopping is difficult
Features:
• UK study in 2014 found that 16% of the 1800 18-24 year olds admitted to using the internet for 15 hours a
day
• A report by the Centre for Social Justice 2006 suggested that many sources of addiction are becoming
cheaper to access which could increase the use of them
• 27% of people in 2008 said that they had used an illegal substance and 31% said they had in 2014
30
How does addiction affect individuals and society:
• People may take time out of work – meaning this costs companies more money on cover staff
• Cost on NHS (every year substance abuse costs the NHS £488 million)
• If addiction is genetic then this would help to explain why not everyone gets addiction to alcohol for
example
• Carmelli et al 1992 found that in identical twins, if one was a smoker then there was a higher chance the
other would be too
• As they share more genes than non-identical twins this suggests that smoking could be genetic
• Goodwin et al 1973 found that adopted children who had at least one biological parent with alcohol
addiction would be more likely to be addicted themselves
• Many different addictions like gambling and alcohol have been linked to this gene (a variation of the gene
called A1)
• This gene is thought to affect the way the brain reacts to pleasure
• Matinez et al 2004 found that a group of heavy users of cocaine were more likely to have a particular
version of a dopamine receptor in the brains of people with this form of the gene
Strengths Weaknesses
• Behaviour is learned through • Behaviours are repeated when • This theory claims that
association they lead to positive behaviour is learned as a result
• When two or more things consequences of observing other people
happen at the same time our • If behaviour is rewarded, it especially those we consider to
brain associates them together will be repeated be role models and modelling
• E.g. if you have been unwell • This positive consequence is a our behaviour on theirs
after eating a certain food form of reinforcement
31
then you won’t want to eat • This strengthens the behaviour • If a child grows up with a
that food again and means its more likely to parent who smokes they may
• This may explain why people be repeated imitate this behaviour
first become addicted to • If you are praised for helping • This can explain how the
something wash up at home then you’ll behaviour starts as they
• If a substance is associated do it again believe this is normal
with positive feelings in some • This could explain why people behaviour as it is what they
way the person learns to become addicted have observed
associate it with the positive • If the thing they are addicted
feeling to makes them feel good then
it reinforces the behaviour and
makes them want to do it
again
• If friends say you’re cool for
smoking, the behaviour is
reinforced and so you’ll do it
again, and again and may
become addicted
Strengths Weaknesses
CBT
• Originally developed in the 1950s and 60s through the work of Ellis and BeckIt began as a way of stopping
alcoholics from drinking
• Aims to help people understand the triggers for their addictive behaviours and then learn how to control
and manage these behaviours
• There are two key changes; functional analysis followed by skills training
Functional analysis
• Involves looking closely at the addicts behaviour and working out what makes them turn to their addiction
Skills training
• Once functional analysis has been done then the therapist teaches them skills that they can use to avoid
the addiction
• Assertiveness training: may be useful if other people are encouraging them into the addictive
behaviour
32
• Improving motivation: helping them to commit to the therapy and stop the addictive behaviour
• In between CBT sessions the patient will be asked to keep a diary of important events to record their
progress
• This treatment can be combined with other therapies such as drug therapies to reduce symptoms of
withdrawal
Strengths Weaknesses
- CBT aims to give patient control – build up the - Addict has to be motivated to change their
right skills to help stop the addiction behaviour
- Young 2007 evidence supports that CBT is - Need skills
effective for internet addiction in the short - Sometimes skills don’t always mean the
term and up to 6 months after treatment behaviour will be reduced
- Morgenstern and Longabaugh 2000 found that
alcoholics often showed the ability to cope with
their addiction after CBT, but did not always
put these skills into practice and actually stop
drinking
Drug addiction
• Patients can suffer from many types of addiction and so treatments will be complex
• Treatment will depend on the type of addiction they have and the severity
• Patients can benefit from taking a form of medication to help them cope with the effects of detoxification
• Many substances like opiates, alcohol and nicotine can cause unpleasant side effects when the patient
stops using them
Withdrawal
• They can have physical symptoms when they stop the addictive behaviour
Reducing cravings
• Many patients who have addictions to substances will find that they crave the substance when they stop
using it
• Nervous system has become used to the effects of the substance and when they stop using it their body
feels like they need it to feel normal
• Some medicines can mimic the drug but can be less harmful so it almost plays a trick on the body
• Drugs can help other issues too which can prevent relapse too
Behavioural addiction
• Drugs can be effective for addictions such as gambling and internet too
• Doctors now prescribe naltrexone which is normally for alcoholics but it can be good for gambling too
• Winder et al 2014 showed that SSRIs can help to reduce thoughts about sex in a group of sex offenders
which suggests it could be a useful therapy for people addicted to sex
Strengths Weaknesses
Caspi et al (2003)
• Caspi et al wanted to investigate why stressful life events seem to lead to depression in some people and
not others
• They then investigated whether stressful life events were more likely to lead to depression in people with a
certain variation of the 5-HTT gene (a gene linked to the amount of serotonin available in the brain)
34
The researchers used an opportunity sample from a cohort of participants who were part of another longitudinal
study. There were 847 participants of 26 years old and they were split into three groups, depending on the version
of the 5-HTT gene they had.
Group 1 two short version 17% of participants
This was a longitudinal study with each participant completing a questionnaire that measured the life events that
occurred between their 21st and 26th birthdays. The events included problems with money, health or relationships.
Another questionnaire assessed whether they had any symptoms of depression in the year before their 26th birthday,
which gave the researchers quantitative data in the form of a depression score. They were initially measured at the
age of 3.
● As the graph below shows, the participants with two short versions of the 5-HTT gene reported more
depression symptoms in response to stressful life events than either of the other two groups.
● Those participants with two long versions reported fewer depression symptoms.
● Moreover, childhood maltreatment was predictive of depression in adulthood only in adults with either one
or two short alleles.
• While there is no direct relation between short versions of the 5HTT gene and depression, there is a
relationship between these and incidences of stress and subsequent depression.
• The long versions of 5-HTT seem to protect against suffering depression because of stress. The effects of
the gene adaptation are dependent on environmental exposure to stress.
Strengths:
● This was a very large cohort of males and females and the age was controlled in order to isolate the
variable of number of stressful life events between the ages of 21 and 26.
35
● It was a natural experiment, with the naturally occurring IV being the length of the 5-HTT. If the results are
replicated this would suggest high reliability.
Limitations:
● Gene action is highly complex, and actions of other genes could not be controlled.
● While the stressful life events were standardised as employment, financial, housing, health and
relationship, whether or not a participant experienced a certain event as stressful is highly personal.
● Moreover, the symptoms of depression were self-reported, although one colleague was contacted for each
participant in order to verify the symptoms; self-reporting can be unreliable
Young (2007) Cognitive behavioural therapy with internet addicts: treatment outcomes and
implication
• Internet addiction has been seen as a specific mental health problem only in recent years
• So little is known about treatments
• Young had seen cognitive behavioural therapy being used effectively to treat many other types of addiction
and wanted to see if it could work for internet addiction
• To investigate the effect of using CBT on internet addiction and to see how problem behaviours improved
over time both during the therapy and after therapy sessions had ended
• 114 participants recruited from the Center for Online Addiction (USA)
• All participants completed the Internet Addiction Test (IAT) and were shown to be addicted
• Any participants who had other psychological problems were not chosen
• Session 1 (functional analysis): find out information about the client (when addiction started, what kind of
symptoms etc etc)
• Session 3, 8 and 12: complete questionnaire called Client Outcome to measure the effectiveness of CBT (12
questions on a 5-point likert scale like ‘rate how your ability to engage in offline activities away from the
computer has improved’)
36
• 96% participants said their biggest problem was the time it took
• Over the course of the sessions the rating (how much they liked the sessions) towards CBT improved
• CBT did work (some improvement) and no significant drop in ratings of these goals 6 months after therapy
ended
• Long-term benefits
Strengths Weaknesses
Nature
• Biological factors
• Genes
• Behaviours work the same as hair colour, skin colour, eye colour etc
Nurture
• Environmental factors
• Violence comes from copying this behaviour, it’s not in our genes
• The nature nurture debate highlights an issue with how we treat mental health and crime
• Nature suggests it’s not someone’s fault that they are violent – so why do we punish people in prison?
37
Psychological Problems Assessment Material
Scott has depression. What symptoms will Scott suffer from? (2 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Scott lives in Imbondu and has recently been diagnosed with a mental health problem. The incidence of his
mental health problem has been rising in Imbondu. How does the incidence of mental health problems, like
Scott’s, change over time? (4 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Scott has been recently diagnosed with depression. His parents have both been diagnosed with depression.
How could genes explain Scott’s recent diagnosis?
What strengths and weaknesses are there of this explanation for Scott’s diagnosis? (4 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
38
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Scott has recently been diagnosed with depression. He failed a recent psychology test and is now considering
dropping out of school. He recently suggested that life was pointless and he has no future.
How could cognitive theory explain Scott’s recent depression? (2 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Scott watched his Dad smoking. The next day Scott tried a cigarette. How could learning theory explain Scott’s
recent behaviour? (2 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Scott has been diagnosed with addiction and has been sent for CBT. What might Scott experience during his
CBT sessions?
What are the strengths and weaknesses of CBT for Scott? (4 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
39
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Scott has been diagnosed with addiction and has been prescribed drugs. What process would Scott go through
when experiencing drug treatment?
What are the strengths and weaknesses of drug treatment for Scott? (4 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Frontal Lobe
40
• Decision making
• Impulse control
• Problem-solving skills
• Concentration
• Paying attention
• Motor cortex is here and this is a large area in front of the central sulcus. The motor cortex plays a key role
in voluntary movements which are the ones we have to think about e.g. kicking a ball
Temporal Lobe
Parietal Lobe
• A large section just behind the central sulcus that is responsible for our sense of touch (somatosensory
cortex)
Occipital Lobe
Cerebellum:
• Takes information from all senses and our spinal cord to coordinate behaviour
• If we are running and see an object in our way the cerebellum combines this information and sends a
message back to the body, telling it to move to avoid the object
Lateralisation
● Lateralisation of function in the brain means that each hemisphere of the brain has different jobs
• Some behaviours are controlled more from the left than the right and vice versa
Asymmetrical function:
• The difference between the two sides of the brain makes it asymmetrical because although they may look
very similar they are not a mirror image
• Each side of the brain appears to control the functions of the opposite side of the body
41
• Right side controls the left body and the left side of the brain controls the right body
Example
– Hand control: the right hemisphere is in control of the left hand while the left hemisphere controls
the right hand. To help the two hemispheres work together a thick layer of nerve fibres (corpus
callosum) connects the hemispheres together
– The corpus callosum allows the two brain sides to communicate with each other so the whole brain
can work as one complete organ
• Right and left hemispheres are linked to the ear on the opposite side of the head
• Auditory information from the right ear will be processed by the left hemisphere but this info is shared
because of the corpus callosum with the whole brain
• If it’s damaged people might find it difficult to talk and develop something called Broca’s Aphasia
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zNKz7YoUao)
• Other areas in the left hemisphere are linked to writing and understanding language
• The right side plays a role in spatial awareness and facial recognition
• Men were better at spatial skills (right-brain tasks) such as imagining what a shape would look like if it was
shown from a different angle
• Females may have a thicker corpus callosum meaning they may use both sides of their brain for some tasks
• Males show dominance for one hemisphere for the same tasks with more activity in one hemisphere than
the other
Strengths Weaknesses
• Supporting evidence: Harasty 1997 said parts of • Rilea 2005 found that males do not always do
the brain that process and produce language better than females of spatial tasks – variation
are slightly bigger in females. Rilea 2005 found • Sommer 2004 said there was no strong evidence
that males were better at some spatial tasks that females used both hemispheres for
• Scientific methods: not subjective and valid language tasks
• Neuron:
• Synapse:
– A gap between two neurons that allows messages, in the form of neurotransmitters, to pass
from one cell to another
43
• The central nervous system (CNS) is made up of the brain and the spinal cord
• The CNS helps the brain and body communicate with one another by passing them messages backwards and
forwards between them
• The sensory nerves in the body (skin, muscles and organs) send messages to the brain via the spinal cord
• The brain processes the information and then sends messages to the body down the spinal cord
• The spinal cord can activate the peripheral nervous system (PNS) which makes the body do the actions the
brain is telling it to do
Synaptic Functioning
44
• Messages are passed throughout the nervous system from
one neuron to the next through synaptic transmission
• When the nerve impulse reaches the terminal button the vesicle releases the neurotransmitter into the
synapse
• The receptors on the next neuron grab the neurotransmitter and they pass the impulse on
Neurological Damage
• Neurological damage refers to any kind of damage to parts of the nervous system
• The brain is an important part of our nervous system so when it’s damaged it causes problems
• When a large part of the brain is damaged it may be due to neurons being interrupted or not working
properly
• If normal functions are no longer possible it can have significant impacts on how a person thinks or behaves
• Two examples of how the brains ability to process information is affected by brain damage are visual
agnosia and prosopagnosia
Visual agnosia
45
• Results in a person not being able to recognise something that is shown to them
• Visual agnosia is a disorder in which a person can see perfectly well but cannot understand what they are
seeing
• Patients might not be able to recognise places they are familiar with
Prosopagnosia
• Face-blindness
• Caused by damage to the part of the brain near the back of the temporal lobe, next to the occipital lobe
known as the fusiform face area (FFA)
• Patients with prosopagnosia find it difficult to identify people from their faces
• Some people find that they see all faces as the same and cannot tell faces apart
• Some find that they cannot recognise faces of people that they know really well
• While other people have more trouble with matching up pictures of faces that they do not know
• Helps keep our emotions balanced so that we do not get too emotional
• Rain et all 1997 studied the brains of murderers and compared these to a similar group of people who had
not committed murder. He found that there were differences in the pre-frontal cortex of the two groups
• Murderers had less activity in the pre-frontal part of the brain making them more impulsive and more
aggressive
46
• In 1848 Phineas Gage was working on a railway line in the USA when an explosion caused an iron rod to be
fired through his head
• Harlow wanted to understand what teaches us about the role of the frontal lobe in the brain
• Damasio and her colleagues now used it to further study his brain
• Researchers used his skull to create a 3D computer representation of the skull, including the holes from the
rod
• Wanted to discover if areas other than the frontal lobe had also been damaged as it was originally thought
it was all damage to the frontal lobe
• Took actual measurements of the iron rod (3 cm in diameter and 109 cm long)
• Could then work out the path the rod took through his head
• 20 different entry points and 16 exit points were tested to try to find the most likely path
• They then mapped out which parts had been harmed of the brain
• Brain damage suffered in the accident was likely to only have affected the frontal lobe
• No other brain areas were harmed (language and motor was fine)
• The iron rod went through his left eye socket and up through the head
• Damage to white matter and neurons meant Gage was unable to pass neural messages in this part of his
brain making it useless
• Damage in both hemispheres seemed to be worse in the middle of the underside while the top edges of
the frontal lobes were less affected
• Ventromedial area of the frontal lobe is important for making sensible decisions and controlling out
impulses around people and also important for emotions
47
• Gage had trouble controlled emotions after the accident
• Damasio had evidence of 12 other patients with similar frontal lobe damage who all showed the same issue
with emotional control
Strengths Weaknesses
• Able to use modern day technology to • Had to use a replica of the skull – entirely
investigate data from 1848 so results can have reliable?
scientific status • Information may not have been accurate from
• Can make predictions and use this for the 150 years ago
future • Generalising information from a one off case
study to everyone else?
• The aim of the study was to show the independence and conscious awareness possessed by each
hemisphere
• In 1968 Sperry studied what effects could be seen in these patients by monitoring how they processed
information using their ‘split-brain’
• 11 participants who had their corpus callosum cut were part of the study.
• All the participants were epileptics and had previously had surgery to deal with their severe epileptic
convulsions.
• All participants were those who had had this surgery to severe their corpus callosum at least 5 years before
the study.
• Given various tasks to test how they processed different types of information in the split brain
• So the left side of each eye would pick up one image (one on the right) while the right side of each eye
would pick up on the other image (on the left)
• We have two visual fields (this must not be confused with our two eyes) The left visual field is what we can
see with our left and the right visual field is what we can see with our right.
• Information on the right of the visual field would be passed to the left hemisphere whilst the left would be
passed to the right hemisphere
Visual Task
• Participants focused on the centre of a screen on which information was presented to the left and right side
of the visual field at the same time
• Two different words or pictures were presented – one of the left and one on the right.
48
• This means that the left side of each eye would pick up one image (the one on the right) while the right
side of each eye would pick up the other image (the one on the left)
• Information on the right visual field will be passed to the left hemisphere and vice versa
• Participants would then be asked to say the word/picture they had seen on the screen
Selecting Task
• Occasionally, rather than say the word/pictures, the participants would be asked to point to an item or
picture
• They would be shown a variety of objects or pictures including the one they had just been shown
• They would then identify what they had seen using either the same hand or the hand on the opposite side
of the body
• Other variations included putting unseen objects into one of the hands and asking them to identify them
from touch alone, and placing different objects in each hand and then asking them to feel for them in a
large pile of different objects
• Results for the tasks involving reading words or selecting objects were seen to be different;
• When words were shown to the right visual field, the patients had no problem repeating the word
back to the researcher
• However when words were shown the left visual field (sent to the right hemisphere), patients had
trouble saying what they had seen
• If a word or picture was shown to the left visual filed (right hemisphere), the participants had little
trouble selecting an object that matched what they had seen. When the word or picture was shown
to the right visual field (left hemisphere) they participants struggled to point to the correct object
• When objects were felt by the right hand (processed in the left hemisphere), they could name the
object. When objects were felt by the left hand (processed in the right hemisphere) they found it
difficult to name the object
• When two different objects were given to the participant – one in each hand – and after they were
asked to feel around in a pile of objects for the two objects, they could only identify each item
with the hand that originally held it. If the opposite hand picked up the item, they could not
identify it as the item they had held before
• Each hemisphere is capable of working well without being connected to the other side
• Each hemisphere has its own memories and without the corpus callosum these cannot be shared between
sides
49
• Right hemisphere is better at identifying objects by feeling for them (feel with left hand if originally held in
left hand) as we have motor movement centres here
Strengths Weaknesses
• Lots of data has been produced supporting • Turks (2002) had a patient that learnt to speak
the roles of each using the right hemisphere after having a split
brain. This finding contradicts Sperry.
• Sperry’s experiment was ground breaking
and scientific
• Only 11 participants – lack of generalisability
Introduction
• Psychology is defined as ‘the scientific study of the human mind and its functions, especially those
affecting behaviour in a given context’
• Psychology was born in 1975 in Germany when Wundt (German researcher) opened the first laboratory for
psychology
• Before this, people has not considered what happened in our heads
• Phineas Gage’s case encouraged doctors to investigate how the brain influences our behaviour
• In these times we could only really study the brain after someone had died and we could remove the brain
• In 1924 Berger developed the EEG brain scan which helped us to measure brain activity in people who are
alive
• Start of ways to study the brain that didn’t rely on someone being dead
• Electrodes are placed onto the scalp and they measure activity
50
• This tells us which parts of the brain work during which activities
• This then led to more modern forms of brain scanning such as MRI and PET scans that give us more detailed
information about how the brain words
• This provides us with an opportunity to help people living with brain damage
• If we can see where the damage is and understand how that area is working or not working then help can
be given
• High powered microscopes to look at how individual synapses work are now used too
• Theories can therefore be developed about exactly which parts of the brain control what kinds of behaviour
• People with risk-taking tendencies often have high levels of dopamine in their nervous system and we can
see this with these scans
Kunal has damaged his cerebellum in a cycling accident. How might Kunal’s behaviour be different to before
the accident?
(2 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Kunal has been for a brain scan and the doctor tells him that he has damaged his frontal lobe. What functions
is the frontal lobe responsible for?
(4 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
51
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Lateralisation
Kunal has damaged his left hemisphere. What tasks might Kunal struggle with?
(2 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Kunal takes some drugs. He feels happy and relaxed at first but later feels terrible. How could his central
nervous system have been affected by the drugs?
(4 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Neurological Damage
Kunal has visual agnosia. How might the condition affect Kunal?
(2 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
52
Kunal has damaged his pre-frontal cortex in a motorbike accident. How might the damage affect Kunal?
(2 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
• Bystander effect/Bystander apathy: Failing to help a person when they are in need.
• In 1964 a young woman called Kitty Genovese was brutally murdered outside of her New York apartment.
Although there were many witnesses to this event, no one stepped in to help.
• Psychologists, Bibb Latané and John Darley called this The Bystander Effect, where people are reluctant to
help because they believe others will help instead.
Situational factors:
➢ Diffusion of responsibility: when several people watch an incident like the Kitty Genovese murder, they
seem to reason that somebody else can, should, and probably will offer assistance. This could explain why
people are generally more likely to help when they are the only person available to offer assistance.
➢ Noticing the event: in large crowds we are less likely to pay attention to what is going on around us so less
likely to notice an emergency.
➢ Pluralistic ignorance: we often look to others and react based on what other people are doing. If other
people are not helping then maybe it’s not an emergency.
➢ Cost of helping: Psychologists argue that when it comes to deciding whether to help or not, we tend to
weigh the costs (for example, humiliation, pain, financial loss) against the benefits (for example, financial
reward, esteem, affection, avoidance of failure or humiliation). We are more likely to help when we feel
that the benefits of helping outweigh the potential costs.
Personal factors:
➢ Competence: if we feel competent (e.g. first aid training) to help, then we are more likely to help.
➢ Similarity: if we see ourselves as similar to the person in need, we are more likely to help them.
53
• Piliavin et al conducted a field experiment to investigate bystander behaviour
• They were particularly interested in the variables that affect whether people help someone in need
• Their study came from the knowledge of the case study of Kitty Genovese – she was brutally murdered and
despite people hearing her screams, no one came to help.
The aim of this study was to conduct a field experiment to investigate the effect of several different variables on
who responded to help, the speed of responding and the likelihood of responding. The main focus of the research
was to investigate the effect of the type of victim (drunk or ill) and the ethnicity of victim (black or white) on
the speed and frequency of the response and the ethnicity of the responder.
The emergencies were staged in the short 7.5 min journey between two stations on the New York
subway (underground). These were trains that did not stop at the stations in between. On each trial four
researchers (two males and two females) entered the train. Four different research teams gathered data from 103
trails. The procedure was always the same: The female confederates took seats and kept notes as unobtrusively as
possible, while the male “victim” and male model (potential “helper”) stood near a pole in the centre of the train.
The four victims were male, three white and one black, aged between 26 and 35 years, all identically casually
dressed. In 38 trials the victim smelled of alcohol and carried alcohol in a brown bag; in 65 trials he appeared sober
and carried a cane. All victims participated in both conditions. The models were all white and aged between 24
and 29.
After passing the first station (approximately 70 secs) the victim collapsed. In the “no help” condition, the model
did nothing until the train slowed to stop, and then helped the victim to his feet. In the “helping” condition, the
helper came to the victim’s assistance.
There were four different helping conditions used in both “drunk” and “cane” situations:
1. Critical area – early. The model stood in the critical area and waited until after the train passed the fourth
station, and then helped the victim. (Approx. 70 secs after collapse.)
2. Critical area – late. The model stood in the critical area and waited until after the train passed the sixth station
before helping the victim. (Approx. 150 secs after collapse.)
3. Adjacent area – early. The model stood a little further way, adjacent to the critical area and waited until after
the train passed the fourth station, and then helped the victim
4. Adjacent area – late. The model stood in the adjacent area and waited until after the sixth station before
helping.
54
In summary, an individual who appears ill is more likely to receive help than someone who seems drunk. With
mixed groups of men and women, men are more likely than women to help a male victim. People are more likely to
help people of the same race especially if they are drunk. There is no strong link between the number of
bystanders and speed of helping in a visible incident. When escape from a situation is not possible and bystanders
are face-to-face with a victim, help is likely. People carry out a cost-reward analysis before deciding whether or
not to help a victim.
Research Method: The field experiments were not subject to demand characteristics, as the travellers on the
underground train did not know they were part of an experiment. Several different experimental conditions that
added to the validity of the findings.
Reliability: Because of methodological problems, there were more cane trials than drunk trials and more white
victims than black victims. Therefore the results from each group’s trials cannot always be reliably compared with
each other. The victims and helpers were all male and the results cannot be generalised to females or a mixed
group. Further research could investigate if women are more likely to help if the victim and the helper are both
female.
Ethical Considerations: There a number of ethical issues associated with Piliavin et al.’s study. Participants were
unaware that they were taking part in an experiment, therefore they could not consent to take part and it was also
not possible to withdraw from the study or be debriefed. Furthermore, seeing a victim collapse may have been
stressful for the participants, they also may have felt guilty if they didn’t help, therefore leading to psychological
harm.
Conformity
Conformity is matching the behaviour and beliefs of others in order to fit in or because we do not know how to
behave in an unusual situation.
Types of Conformity:
● Compliance: a change in behaviour without a change in opinion (going along with the group).
● Internalisation: a change in behaviour and opinion. 'True Conformity'.
● Identification: adopting the group's views because value group membership. Often temporary.
55
Situational factors affecting conformity:
● Group size: conformity increases with group size up to 3 persons in the group, and then levels off
● Unanimity of the majority: the presence of a single confederate who disagrees with the majority reduces
conformity
● Task difficulty/ambiguity: if the task is more difficult then we are more likely to look to others for the
right answer and therefore conformity increases when the task is harder
● Locus of control: a person with an internal locus of control is less likely to be influenced by others around
them and therefore less likely to conform as they feel responsible for their actions.
Procedure: in a laboratory experiment Asch put a naive participant in a room with seven
confederates. The confederates had agreed in advance what their responses would be
when presented with the line task. The real participant did not know this and was led to
believe that the other seven participants were also real participants like themselves. Each
person in the room had to state aloud which comparison line (A, B or C) was most like the
target line. The answer was always obvious. The real participant sat at the end of the row
and gave his or her answer last. In some trials, the seven confederates gave the wrong
answer.
Results: Asch measured the number of times each participant conformed to the majority view. On average, about
one third (32%) of the participants in each trial went along and conformed to the clearly incorrect majority. Three
quarters of the participants (75%) conformed on at least one trial.
Conclusion: Why did the participants conform so readily? When they were interviewed after the experiment, most
of them said that they did not really believe their conforming answers, but had gone along with the group for fear
of being ridiculed or thought "peculiar". A few of them said that they really did believe the group's answers were
correct.
Haney, Banks and Zimbardo (1973) A Study of Prisoners and Guards in a Simulated Prison:
Key Study
21 male psychology students. Paid $15 per day. They were randomly allocated to two groups: prisoners and prison
guards.
The prisoners were arrested at home (unexpectedly) and taken to the university.
56
They were stripped, deloused and given a prison uniform and prisoner number. From now on they were referred to
by number, not by name. They were to spend 23 hours a day locked in their cells for two weeks.
The prison guards were given uniforms, including sticks and mirrored sunglasses. They worked shifts and went home
at the end of their shift.
The experiment was called off after only 6 days. The guards had become so brutal to the prisoners that two
prisoners had some form of nervous breakdown, one developed a nervous rash all over his body and one went on
hunger strike!! While the guards were giving their orders, the prisoners became apathetic. They did not stand up to
the guards and simply did as they were told, even though it caused them distress.
One explanation for why the participants’ reactions were so extreme in this study could be that they conformed to
social roles. A role is a part you play during your life. Each role requires different behaviour. If you are given a new
role, e.g. when you start a new job, you change your behaviour to suit. In Zimbardo's study, the students were
given new roles - prisoner or guard - and simply conformed to the behaviour of these roles.
● However, there is considerable evidence that the participants did react to the situation as though it was
real. For example 90% of the prisoners’ private conversations, which were monitored by the
researchers, were on the prison conditions, and only 10% of the time were their conversations about
life outside of the prison. The guards, too, rarely exchanged personal information during their
relaxation breaks - they either talked about ‘problem prisoners’, other prison topics, or did not talk at
all. The guards were always on time and even worked overtime for no extra pay. When the prisoners
were introduced to a priest, they referred to themselves by their prison number, rather than their first
name. Some even asked him to get a lawyer to help get them out.
● The only deception involved was to do with the arrest of the prisoners at the beginning of the
experiment. The prisoners were not told partly because final approval from the police wasn’t given
until minutes before the participants decided to participate, and partly because the researchers
wanted the arrests to come as a surprise. However this was a breach of the ethics of Zimbardo’s own
contract that all of the participants had signed.
● When Zimbardo realised just how much the prisoners disliked the experience, which was unexpected,
the experiment was abandoned.
● Approval for the study was given from the Office of Naval Research, the
Psychology Department and the University Committee of Human Experimentation. This
Committee also did not anticipate the prisoners’ extreme reactions that were to follow.
● Alternative methodologies were looked at which would cause less distress to
the participants but at the same time give the desired information, but nothing suitable
could be found.
● Extensive group and individual debriefing sessions were held and all
participants returned post-experimental questionnaires several weeks, then several months
later, then at yearly intervals
● Zimbardo also strongly argues that the benefits gained about our
understanding of human behaviour and how we can improve society should out balance the
distress caused by the study.
Obedience
57
Obedience is a form of social influence, e.g. when a person obeys instructions from someone else, usually a
perceived authority figure. We are socialised to obey, obedience prevents accidents and creates an orderly society,
without obedience there would be challenges to social order resulting in chaos and war.
Aim: test the levels of obedience that ppts would reach when told to give
electric shocks. (Germans are different hypothesis)
Results: 100% ppts gave 300v, 65% ppt gave the highest 450v, many ppts showed distress.
Conclusion: Volunteers were willing to shock another person simply because they were told to by someone in
authority even when uncomfortable about doing so.
After Milgram conducted his first study on obedience, he carried out a large number of variations in order to
consider the situational variables that might create greater or lesser obedience.
▪ Proximity of the authority figure: When the authority figure was not in the room and instead gave
instructions by telephone, obedience fell to 20.5%.
▪ Proximity of the victim: In the proximity variation, they were in the same room and obedience rate
dropped from 65% to 40%.
▪ Location (legitimacy of the context): Milgram conducted a variation in a run-down building rather than
the prestigious university setting where it was originally conducted (Yale University). Obedience levels fell
to 47.5%.
▪ Uniform: The role of the experimenter was taken over by an ‘ordinary member of the public’ (a
confederate) in everyday clothes rather than a lab coat. The obedience level dropped to 20%, the lowest of
the variations.
▪ Personal responsibility: when the participant was instructed to work with another person who gave the
shock obedience rose to 90%.
▪ Support of others: When a confederate refused to continue above 150v only 10% of the participants
continued to 450v.
● Locus of control: People who disobey will be more likely to have an internal locus of control
● Authoritarian personality: someone who has respect for authority figures, rigid beliefs, right-wing and is
aggressive is more likely to follow orders. This authoritarian personality type can be measured using the
F-Scale as developed by Adorno.
Crowd Behaviour
Crowd behaviour can be understood in terms of deindividuation as members lose their personal identity among
others. Each member of the crowd is more likely to conform to the behaviour of the majority.
58
Within a crowd, an authority figure can exert an influence over others causing high levels of obedience.
➢ Familiarity of the situation – the more ambiguous the situation the more obedience.
➢ Distance- proximity of authority figure is important so removal from the situation leads to less obedience.
➢ Education – organisations can use education programmes and policies to help support employees.
A social issue is a problem that influences a considerable number of the individuals within a society e.g.
anti-Semitism and rioting.
● Obedience - helps us understand the Holocaust
● Conformity - helps us understand riots
● Deindividuation -helps us understand riots because people in large groups are more likely to be
deindividuated
● Bystander effect - Helps us understand the murder of Kitty Genovese
Culture: refers to a set of beliefs, practices and traditions held by a large group of people. The greatest division
between beliefs and traditions are held by:
Collectivistic cultures: typically eastern, emphasising group membership, interdependence and cooperation.
● Obedience - Milgram's obedience studies were all on Americans. America is a Western culture which
values individualism particularly highly; it is also a democratic culture with relatively
little deference (although American culture in the 1960s was more deferential than it is today). Because of
this, we might expect obedience levels to be higher in many other cultures, but perhaps lower in cultures
even less deferential and even more individualistic than the USA.
● Conformity rates are generally higher in collectivist cultures.
● Deindividuation occurs across all cultures equally.
● Collectivistic cultures are more likely to help someone in need if they are a member of their group.
Key terms:
59
Elizabeth is watching football when she is told by her father to wash the dishes. She immediately does as her
father has instructed her to. Is Elizabeth conforming or showing obedience?
(1 mark)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Bystander intervention
There is a car accident outside a small office block with 32 employees inside. The employees in the office all
witness the car accident but none of them go outside to help the injured driver or passengers. Why might the
employees have remained inside?
(4 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Conformity
Michael is in the local shopping centre with six of his friends and they begin to shout at a passer-by in the
shopping centre. Michael joins in with the shouting, but later he feels upset at what he did. Why might Michael
have joined in with the others and feel upset?
(4 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Obedience
60
Michael is told by his teacher to tidy the stationery cupboard at lunch time. Michael has homework and
revision for a test that he wanted to do at lunch time, but instead he tidies the teacher’s stationery cupboard.
Why might Michael have tidied the stationery cupboard instead of doing his own work?
(2 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Michael is at home and his mother has told him to tidy his room. Michael does not want to tidy his room today
as he has homework to complete. His mother states that he must tidy his room and Michael refuses, stating
that it is his choice and he is going to do his homework first. Can you explain why Michael reacted in this way?
(2 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Michael and Oscar attend a football match between Michael’s favourite team and Oscar’s favourite team. Both
boys are dressed in their team football shirts. Michael and Oscar do not sit together at the match; they sit with
the groups of fans for their own team on different sides of the stadium. Both boys shout negative comments at
the fans of the opposing team during the football game. After it is over, they return home and continue to be
friends. Why might the boys behave in this way at the football match?
(4 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
61
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Operant Conditioning
• Skinner 1948 developed a theory of learning called operant conditioning
• He believed that behaviours we display are likely to be repeated if they are reinforced, or extinguished and
not repeated again if we are punished
• There are two types of reinforcement – positive and negative – the consequences of which encourage us to
repeat a behaviour we have displayed
• There is also punishment (prevents undesired behaviour)
Positive Reinforcement
• We receive a pleasurable or rewarding consequence for our behaviour
• If this happens then we are more likely to perform this behaviour again
• Criminal behaviour: if someone receives praise from their family for fighting or for vandalising something
then they are likely to commit this crime again
62
Negative Reinforcement
• When a behaviour we display is strengthened by the avoidance of an unpleasant experience
• We are likely to repeat a behaviour if it gets rid of something unpleasant
• E.g. doing your homework to avoid a detention
• Criminal behaviour: if someone is able to stop a bully by punching them they are likely to perform this
behaviour again
Positive Punishment
• Receiving a negative consequence for a behaviour, such as a child being told off by a parent for not keeping
their bedroom tidy
• This is often the way that we treat criminal behaviour
• If someone does a criminal act and is fined or imprisoned they are being positively punished (getting
something - getting attention)
Negative Punishment
• Taking away something pleasant as a consequence of undesirable behaviour
• Removing a child from a birthday party if they are being naughty
• Criminal: person may enjoy being part of a gang, the gang may start to vandalise public property but
because the person does not want to join in they are told to leave the gang
• Undesired behaviour of not vandalising property is punished
Primary Reinforcers
• These satisfy basic biological needs such as food and water
• Parent may reward a child with food treats for behaving well
• Most criminals won’t commit crime for a primary reinforcer but some who are in extreme poverty will
commit a crime so they can get a bed, food and a roof over their head in prison
Secondary Reinforcers
• Common such as school grades and tokens
• No survival value but we have learned to associate them with a primary reinforcer
• Credit card: the car itself has no value but it can be used to buy goods which are rewarding or can satisfy a
need such as hunger if the card is stolen
• It explains that we learn from one another, rather than directly from reinforcement or punishment
• Bandura 1977 explains behaviour as a consequence of observing and modelling behaviour around us
• This is known as observational learning
• We don’t just copy, we are motivated to copy
• We copy role models
• Attention
– You must be able to and want to pay attention to the behaviour
• Retention
– You need to retain and remember the behaviour
• Reproduction
– You need to reproduce it, e.g. backflip
• Motivation
– Have to want to reproduce it e.g. get pleasure out of doing it
– Vicarious reinforcement
• Identification
– Most likely to happen with someone you identify with
63
• Look up the Bobo doll study
• Explains behaviour without reinforcers
• Explains why some who see crimes, copy and why some don’t – how?
• Studies to support are lab studies and some only measure short-term effects
• Were the studies ethical?
• Can we apply the findings to real life?
• Doesn’t explain murder? Have all murderers seen a murder?
Personality Theory
• Personality: set of characteristics that determine what we are like
• Some personality theories believe that our personality is a temperament (the nature someone is born with)
which has a biological basis
• These theories can explain how some personalities are associated with being a criminal
• Eysenck 1964: studied different personality traits and suggested that certain characteristics could be more
prone to crime
Extraversion/introversion
• Extraversion is really outgoing and sociable, introversion is reverted and quiet
Neuroticism
• Nervous disposition of someone, if they are stable then they are calm and do not over-react in situations, if
unstable they are highly emotional
Psychoticism:
• This is a personality trait that shows a lack of empathy towards others
• Each trait can be measured using a questionnaire that Eysenck devised called the Eysenck Personality
Questionnaire (EPQ)
• Each question measures all three traits and gives them a PEN score (psychotic, extravert, neurotic)
• People with a high E on the EPQ are believed to have a nervous system that has a low arousal level so they
seek external stimulation to raise their biological arousal level
• They do this by being outgoing and sensation-seeking
• People with a low E are characterised by high arousal so they avoid thrill and excitement in order to
dampen their biological arousal level
64
• Unstable neurotics have a high N and are believed to have a nervous system that responds quickly to stress
and they over-react
• People with a low N have unreactive nervous system meaning they are calm in stressful situations
• Eysenck was less clear about the biological basis for psychoticism but he did believe that it was also linked
to our biological make-up
• A high P means that a person is cold, lacks compassion and can be antisocial
Recidivism
Prison
• Offenders can be punished in different ways
• For serious crimes, people will be imprisoned
• They will be denied of civil liberties such as freedom, privileges for a time determined by the court
• The period is decided by the seriousness of the crime
• The more serious the crime, the longer the sentence
• Prison is said to be effective because it is based on the principles of operant conditioning
• Operant conditioning: positive punishment is given to an offender that should prevent them from
reoffending
• Prison acts as a deterrent for potential offenders so is a form of negative reinforcement: people will avoid
prison by abiding by the law
• Some may commit a crime to be put in prison because they find stability, routine, friendship, food and
water (positive reinforcement)
Strengths Weaknesses
65
• Removes the offender from public so they don’t • Can still offend after
have the opportunity to reoffend • 25% of offenders reoffend within the first year
• Keeps the public safe – reassuring of release (young people more likely) – so does
• Operant conditioning says that a crime should prison work?
not happen again • Criminals are exposed to more criminal role
models – social learning
• Criminal record means they can’t get a job
after so may turn to crime again for financial
support etc
• Is it ethical? Putting all people in a confined
space
Community Sentencing
• When you are convicted of a crime and have to do a community service rather than go to prison
• Common for minor offences, first time offenders, or if prison is not appropriate
• Voluntary work or unpaid work in the community such as litter picking
• Offender may be given a curfew, be restricted from certain areas and have to report to a community
manager
• They may be sent to prison if they don’t follow these orders
Strengths Weaknesses
Restorative Justice
• Practice that involves an offender meeting up or communicating with the victim or people they have
harmed by their crime
• So a burglar would meet the residents from whom they have stolen
• This can help the offender to see the impact of their crime first hand
• Conducted in an informal and neutral environment where they all feel safe
Strengths Weaknesses
66
Treatments
Token Economy
Strengths Weaknesses
• They control and manage behaviour (not reduce • Won’t reduce reoffending because tokens don’t
recidivism) exist in real life
• Short-term increase in prosocial behaviour • Prosocial behaviour is limited to prison only
• Hobbs and Holt (1976) introduced token • Limited rehabilitative value
economies in 3 prisons for young offenders and • Need commitment from prison staff
compared to a control prison and found that
targeted prosocial behaviours such as queuing
for dinner correctly was better in the token
prisons
• Cheap compared to counselling etc
Three stages:
• Cognitive preparation – where an offender has to reflect on their own anger: what makes them angry
• Skills acquisition: learn new skills to help control the anger, learn relaxation techniques
• Application practice: role playing anger-triggering situations so the offender can practice their skills
Strengths Weaknesses
• Offenders are only given this treatment if its • Not all crimes are violent
suitable • Offenders can abuse the programme
• Dowden, Blachette and Serin 1999 found that • Rice (1997) said that psychopaths were more
high risk offenders who received anger likely to reoffend and become more dangerous
management treatment were less likely to after this treatment because they had acquired
re-offend compared to high0risk offenders who new skills on the programme that helped them
did not undergo anger management manipulate others more effectively
• Howells 2005 did not find any improvement
other than the treated offenders having a
greater understanding of anger suggesting an
educational benefit
• Offenders have to be highly motivated
67
Bandura, Ross and Ross (1961) Transmission of Aggression through Imitation of
Aggressive Models
• Bandura, Ross and Ross were influenced by previous research that demonstrated that children could learn
incidentally through the mere observation of another
• They were interested in sex-appropriate behaviour
• Girls would be rewarded for role-playing housework and punished for rough play
• Sex appropriate behaviours would have been reinforced throughout childhood and so children would be
more likely to be in the habit of imitating the same sex
• To see if children would imitate aggression that was role-played by an observed adult
• They were specifically interested in whether the sex of the role model and sex of the child would be an
important factor in aggression of the child
• Children who were exposed to the aggressive role model (male or female) displayed more aggression than
the control group or the children exposed to non-aggressive role model
• Children imitate aggression
• True for physical and verbal
• They devised new ways of being aggressive too
• Boys were more likely to copy the same-sex aggressive role model physically than girls were
• But girls were just as likely as boys to imitate verbal aggression of same-sex role model
68
• Children learn through observation
• Evidence for the social learning theory
• Children learn aggression from adult role models
• Child didn’t even have to know the model
Strengths Weaknesses
• Natural experiment because the researchers did not directly manipulate the independent variable
(introduction of television)
• Dependent variable was behaviour of the children before and after the television was introduced
• Measured in terms of prosocial and antisocial behaviour in the playground
• Researchers went there in 1994 and recorded behaviour of children four months before TV was introduced
69
• Video cameras in 2 primary schools and observed behaviour of children aged 3-8 years old over 2 weeks
• Five years later after TV was introduced they did the same again
Strengths Weaknesses
• Same primary schools were used in both • Findings are limited to this community
observations – same environment – • Different locations find different things
standardisation – reliable • Williams 1981 conducted a similar study in
• Natural experiment, high ecological validity Canada and found aggression was influenced by
TV
• TV programmes watched may be different e.g.
Teenage mutant ninja turtles has a high level of
violence but was not shown here
Learning Theories
Ian is given a sticker each time he tidies his room. When he does not tidy his room he is not allowed to play on
his computer game. What type of reinforcement does Ian receive? What type of punishment does Ian receive?
(4 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
70
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Vicky is given permission to not attend a school trip to a large city because she is frightened of crowded
places. Her friend Sarah does not attend the trip either but this is without permission and Sarah receives a
detention from the head teacher. What type of reinforcement does Vicky receive by not attending? What type
of punishment does Sarah receive for not attending?
(4 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Vicky is 12 years old. She is shopping with her 17-year-old sister Pamela when she observes Pamela taking
make-up from the shop without paying. That night, Pamela’s friends are complimenting her on how nice her
new make-up is. When Vicky is at the shops the following week, she takes make-up without paying. How would
social learning theory explain why Vicky takes this make-up without paying?
(4 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Biological explanations
Sarah has been arrested for smashing a window and breaking into a shop to steal some clothes. She tells the
police that she is not really all that bothered by her arrest and that the shop charges too much for clothes so
they deserve it. Sarah says she does not really care that there are laws that make theft a crime, then laughs as
the police officer charges her with several criminal offences. Can you describe one personality type that
Sarah’s behaviour might indicate?
71
(2 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Recidivism
Mike is 19 years old and has been caught by police for drawing graffiti on the wall of the local community
centre. The centre is used by a parent and toddler group during the day and for community bingo for over 60’s
one evening a week. Mike’s family have a history of criminal and anti-social behaviours and they have said that
graffiti is not that bad and should not even be a crime. The court decides that using restorative justice may
help Mike to understand how his behaviour affects other people. Why might the court think that restorative
justice would work in Mike’s case? What other punishment could be appropriate for Mike?
(4 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Treatments
Mike is 22 years old and has received several criminal convictions. He appears in court for assaulting an
employee of a local company who Mike claimed deserved to be hit because they had refused to interview him
for a job. Mike is sentenced to 6 months’ imprisonment. How would you use a treatment programme to
prevent Mike from recidivism?
(4 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
72
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Michael Lewis
73
• Our self is what separates us from others
• Self-concept refers to our view of our view of our self that we get from how others react to us
• Lewis says the idea of self develops with age and is affected by experiences
• He separates the self into; existential self and categorical selfExistential self
• This starts at around 2 months old and it comes from interactions with the world
• E.g. a baby touches a rattle and hears a sound and so relates it own touching of the rattle to the sound
• We have control over our world and we quickly develop a schema for this
Categorical self
• A child realises that they can be categorised by; age, gender etc
• The categorical self changes as someone’s values change and develop at around 18 months old
• If they reach for their own nose they show a sense of self
• If what we think we should be from cultural and social views does not match how we see ourselves then this
gives a state of incongruence which impacts our mental health negatively
Self-actualisation
74
• Refers to ones potential
• When the parts of the self match and a person experiences congruence there can be self-actualisation
• Self actualisation is only difficult when parts of the self don’t match or balance
• Erikson 1959 focused on mental and social development and looked at our whole lifespan from birth to old
age and how we build our identity through crises
• This is originally a biopsychosocial theory (biology, psychology and social factors all play a role)
• Erikson said that a psychological problem can occur if we do not develop through normal stages
Strengths Weaknesses
- Can be applied to people throughout their - Cultures have wide differences and it doesn’t
lifespan consider other cultures (done in USA) – e.g.
- Practical applications: Goodcase and Love 2016 marriage at 13 in some cultures is normal
suggest using Erikson’s ideas about integrity and
despair with therapists working with those over
65 showing that older people are skill
75
developing and can benefit from examining - Gilligan 1982 criticised Erikson’s theory for
their own beliefs using gender stereotypes such as intimacy or
isolation being about women more than men
• Baumesiter 2008 looks at free will which is about self-control and making rational choices
• If things happen because of our biology or our environment it is hard to say we are free in our
decisions – deterministic
• Jean Paul Sarte claimed that there is always a choice about an action
• Kant felt that freedom was about morality and sound reasoning but that only some actions are
decided on in this way. Free will is about reasoned choices
• Self-control and making choices is biologically expensive – it can deplete our resources by using up a lot of
glucose in our brain
• E.g. it was found that after blood glucose depletion, drinking lemonade with sugar improve people’s
self-control on tasks
• A belief in free will explains our justice system: if nobody is responsible for their behaviour then how can
we punish people. Our justice system believes in free will
• Belief in free will improves prosocial behaviour: can help with self control. People feel empowered
• A belief in free will improves control over emotions and impulses: rational decisions
• A belief in free will helps someone to learn from the challenges they encounter: can be reflective on any
guilt or problems associated with negative event
Strengths Weaknesses
- Focus on everyday understanding of what it - When free will is tested it becomes specific to
meanst to act from free will decision making tasks rather than wide spread –
can we generalise these findings
- Baumeister and Munroe 2014 suggested that - There are other explanations for what we might
once social psychology can measure free will in see as free will. Elbert and Wegnet 2011 carried
terms of making choices and decisions, out an experiment to see if randomness could
scientific experiments can be carried out to be mistaken for free will and found that it
advance understanding of free will – Vohr and could
Schooler 2008 did this experiment
Humanistic Explanation
• Looks at humans and the individuals own experiences and interpretation about what is going on
76
• People are inherently good with an inbuilt need to make things better
• Optimistic approach
• Humans are good by nature and all individuals naturally aim for personal growth
• To be the best we can be we must have a positive sense of self-concept and be in a state of congruence to
enable self-actualisation
• Unconditional positive regard: need this from others, valuing someone for who they are with no conditions
attached, improves self-esteem and self-image. Can make mistakes and still be valued
• Conditional positive regard: being valued but only according to certain conditions, which lowers someone’s
overall self-esteem. Some parents might love a child only if they behave
Strengths Weaknesses
Hierarchy of needs
• Maslow’s explanation of personality includes biological aspects as they look at people as whole individuals
• Humanistic theory
• Maslow’s point is that underlying needs generally have to be met before the next need can be achieved
• First 4 needs ‘deficiency’ needs: if they are not met the person can be anxious and tense
77
Strengths and weaknesses of Maslow’s humanistic theory
Strengths Weaknesses
- Positive psychology: people are good and can - Focuses on Western culture: generalisation
reach their full potential - Concepts are not measurable
- Claims humans are basically good but Van
Ijzendoorn et al 2019 found 7 year old
children did not show moral behaviour
because of inborn temperament but it was
situation that led to their donating to charity
or not
Internal: Temperament
• Temperament is a biological aspect of a person
• It is different for each person and relates to emotions and controlling oneself
• Temperament can affect self-concept
• Someone with low self-esteem who has a shy temperament may become depressed
78
• Heinonen 2002 found that children judged by their mothers to have difficult temperaments at 12 years old
reported that they had low self-esteem at the age of 18
• Temperament types; effortful control (tendency to be negative)
Internal: Persistence
• Windle 1986 found that persistence goes well with high self-esteem
• If someone is persistent and determined to do something, they are more likely to have high self esteem
External: Experience
• Self-efficacy is how strongly we believe we can succeed
• Can be related to one goal
• Can depend on others reactions to us
• Comes from experiences and interactions with the world
External: Self-image
• Argyle 2008: influence on our self esteem comes from reactions of others
• Positive self esteem comes from praise and attention, negative comes from criticism
• Self image will be negative if we compare to others
• Experiences in the world give us an understanding of what is acceptable in our society including how we see
different social roles etc
Personality scales
• For example, ‘on a scale of happy-sad where happy is 10 and sad is 1, what score would you give yourself?’
• Items on a personality test often focus on the ‘Big Five’ dimensions; openness, conscientiousness,
extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism
79
• Participants may get a likert scale e.g. ‘rate how you feel from 1-5’.
For example, if the questions are mainly worded like You can insert a ‘quality control question’ in the middle
this; of the questionnaire that reads;
‘I tend to always be grumpy’ ‘This is a quality control question, please
1 = strongly agree, 2 = agree, 3 = neutral, 4 = disagree, select number 5’
5 = strongly disagree
And most of the participants answers are ‘1 = strongly
agree’, they may become lazy and stop reading the
question as they know they are just probably going to
be a ‘1’ on all answers.
To ensure we can tell whether the participants are
reading all the question, the next question might be
worded like this;
‘I tend to rarely be moody’
1 = strongly agree, 2 = agree, 3 = neutral, 4 = disagree,
5 = strongly disagree
Personality types
• Myers and Briggs (1956) based their test of personality on Jung’s idea that we experience the world in
different ways
• Jung said there are 8 personality types made up of; extraversion, introversion, sensing, intuition, thinking
and feeling
• They used this and came up with 4 ways that people experience the world:
• This helped couples recognise their differences and work on them to smooth their path
Trait theory
• Trait theory is about the measurement of personality traits which can be broad
80
• There are lots of personality traits
• But they are all categorised (e.g. introvert covers shy etc)
Factor analysis
• Forms underlying characteristics that predict behaviour from the outward characteristics that people show
• E.g. if someone enjoys parties, is interested in people and seeks out activities where there is danger, factor
analysis will show that these outward characteristics often go together in people – so they may be labelled
as an extravert
• He classified traits into three levels which he called cardinal, central and secondary
• Cardinal traits: rare traits that govern us strongly, dominate someone’s life, extreme altruism for
example (helping someone at great risk to oneself)
• Central traits: less strong and more common; include loyalty and friendliness
• Secondary traits: do not always show but still have, such as being angry when we are made late for
something
• Cattell 1946 aimed to reduce Allport’s list of around 4000 traits to something that would be easier to use to
measure personality
• Some of Allport’s words were similar to others but some were different
• Instead of 171 traits he suggested someone’s personality could be summarised more usefully by showing
how far they displayed certain traits
81
• Data from questionnaires to get people’s self-ratings about their behaviour and feelings
• Cattell then used factor analysis on his data to see which traits went together to he could reduce the 171
list
Strengths Weaknesses
- Observable traits used which means we can - Hard to predict behaviour from their traits as
measure them they might behave differently in different
- Self-rating scale meant no interpretation from situations
someone else - People have to be self-aware to rate themselves
- Different theories have come up with similar
traits – reliability
82
● The experimental group read about Francis Crick’s claim, in 1994, that we have no free will and what we do
comes from the way our brain works
● The independent variable was which passage was read
● The computer program was a way of cheating to give them answers to maths problems they were supposed
to be solving themselves
● A measure of the participants beliefs about free will and determinism was recorded before and after the
study
● To measure cheating, the number of space bar presses one a computer (a space bar avoided the answer
being revealed, so avoided cheating) was recorded. This was the dependent variable.
● Participants who read Crick’s ‘anti-free-will’ passage showed lower belief in free will than those in the
control condition
● This showed that Crick’s passage lef some participants to believe more strongly in determinism
● Space bar presses for each participant were recorded
● However, presses showed a lack of cheating and Vohs and Schooler wanted their results to show cheating
● They therefore subtracted the number of space bar presses for each person from 20 to give a ‘cheating
score’
● Participants showed more cheating if they read the ‘anti-free-will’ passage than if they did not
● When determinism is put forward as a view and free-will beliefs are challenged, behaviour becomes less
moral (measured by cheating)
Strengths Weaknesses
- Ethical strengths: participants could shred their - Problems with measuring cheating; weren’t
results to remain private necessarily cheating, perhaps just not doing
- Debrief anything
- Practical application: behaviour comes from - Was it unethical to make people act immorally
genes and the environment – implications for - Artificial setting – ecological validity
society
• Studies have shown that children see their pets as warm and empathetic
• Pets show an unconditional positive regard for owners (they don’t ask for anything in return)
• When children are aged between 9-12 they form a sense of autonomy
• Houtte and Jarvis (1995) focused on young adolescents, looking at pet ownership and children’s well-being
• Aimed to see how having pets impacted children’s self-esteem, self-concept, sense of autonomy and
attachment to animals
• Van Houtte and Jarvis tested 130 children aged between 8 and 11
• The school gave their permission for the study and they have the right to withdraw at any time.
• Of 130 children, 65 were pet owners and 65 were not.
• Interviews were used to find out background information such as whether the parents were married or not.
• The pet-owning children were then matched with non-pet-owning children based on this information
• The Independent variable was whether the child owned a pet or not
• The dependent variables were autonomy, self-esteem, self-concept and attachment all measured by
questionnaires
Measures taken;
• Measure of autonomy
– 20 questionnaire items, using likert type scales, asked about perception of parents as people, how
much parents are idealised, how much parents are depended upon
• Measure of self-concept
– Self-Concept Scale for Children (Lipsitt, 1958) was used, includes 22 descriptions that find out
children’s views of themselves, such as ‘I’m happy’
• Measure of self-esteem
– Standard scale asking how much the child agrees with statements such as ‘I am satisfied with
myself’
• Measure of attachment to animals
– A questionnaire was given to pet-owning participants with statements such as ‘I consider my pet to
be a friend’
84
● 11 year-old pet owners had higher self-concept than non-pet owners of the same age (mean of 94.2
compared with 83.2)
● Pet owners were more likely than non-pet owners to see their parents as people and pet owners could see
their parents in roles other than the parental role – both suggest autonomy
• Van Houtte and Jarvis concluded that pet ownership seemed to increase autonomy and self-esteem
especially in adolescents
• Best for 11 year olds
Limitations:
Bradley believes he is very bad at learning to speak French. He finds it very difficult and wishes he could learn
better so that he can pass his exams. Bradley is struggling to motivate himself to go to lessons as he feels
embarrassed when his teacher asks him questions. How would Rogers (1959) explain why Bradley feels
embarrassed? (4 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Cathy is in early adulthood. She has been in a relationship with her boyfriend for six years and they have
recently decided to get married. They are also planning a family once they marry. Erikson (1959) would say
that Cathy is in the intimacy versus isolation stage of development. How do you know if Cathy is in conflict or
has resolved this stage? (2 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
85
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Ted is 13 years old. He learnt how to make a meal at school, and tried to do this at home to show his parents.
Ted cooked the meal, but it did not taste very nice. His parents said they were proud of him for trying his best
and they appreciated him having a go at making the meal. What type of positive regard did Ted’s parents show
him? (2 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Caitlin is 11 years old and her family have recently bought a puppy. Caitlin helps look after the puppy. She
takes him for walks, bathes him and brushes him. Using your knowledge of Van Houtte and Jarvis (1995)
discuss how the puppy will benefit Caitlin. (2 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Jacob completed a self-report questionnaire about his personality. What issues might there be when
personality is tested using self-report questionnaires? (4 marks)
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
86
87
Topic 11: RESEARCH METHODS
88