Pediococcus
Pediococcus
Pediococcus
Pediococcus (often referred to by brewers as "Pedio") are Gram-positive
lactic acid bacteria (LAB) used in the production of Belgian style beers
where additional acidity is desirable. They are native to plant material and
fruits [1], and often found in spontaneously fermented beer as the primary
source of lactic acid production (with P. damnosus being the only species
identified in Lambic) [2][3]. It is also seen as a major source of beer
contamination in commercial breweries due to its ability to adapt to and
survive in beer. The ability to grow in beer is strain dependent rather than
species dependent, however, genetic differences indicate that P. damnosus Pediococcus - picture taken by Per
and P. claussenii are better adapted to surviving in beer than P. pentosaceus Karlsson (https://www.instagram.co
[4]. Like many bacteria, pediococci have the ability to transfer genes m/wildandsour/)
horizontally (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horizontal_gene_transfer)
without reproduction [4]. They are generally considered to be facultative
anaerobes, which means they grow anaerobically but can also grow in the presence of oxygen [5]. Some
species/strains (including individual strains of P. damnosus) can have their growth and acid production inhibited
by oxygen [6], while some will have better growth and produce more acid in the presence of oxygen
(microaerophilic) [7][8]. Strains found in beer are hop tolerant [9]. Due to their continued metabolism of longer
chain polysaccharides, acid production will increase with storage time. Pediococcus can form a pellicle.
Pediococcus may also cause “ropiness” (also called a "sick beer") due to the production of exopolysaccharides
when exposed to a fresh sugar source. "Ropy" or "sick" beer is more viscous and, in extreme circumstances, can
form strands. Sickness effects mostly the mouthfeel and appearance of the beer, and may have no influence on
the flavor. It is considered a temporary flaw in sour beer. Some brewers, including Vinnie Cilurzo from Russian
River Brewing and some Belgian lambic producers, claim that after the ropiness goes away (generally in 3-6
months [10]) it produces a deeper acidity and mouthfeel, and is viewed as a positive process in the production of
sour beer [11]. For other brewers, ropy beer is seen as a nuisance due to the beer needing to be aged for a longer
period of time, especially when it occurs shortly after bottling. Pediococcus species can also produce diacetyl
with extended storage time [12]. Brettanomyces can break down exopolysaccharides and diacetyl produced by
Pediococcus and the two are often used together.
See Lactobacillus, Brettanomyces, Saccharomyces, Mixed Cultures, Kveik, and Nonconventional Yeasts and
Bacteria charts for other commercially available cultures.
Contents
1 Introduction of Characteristics and Taxonomy
2 Commercial Pediococcus Cultures
2.1 Manufacturer Tips
2.1.1 Bootleg Biology on Sour Weapon P
2.1.2 Wyeast on 5733
2.1.3 White Labs on WLP661
2.2 Tips From MTF
2.2.1 The Rare Barrel
3 Metabolism
3.1 Growth and Environment
3.1.1 Starter Information
3.1.2 Sulfur Dioxide
3.1.3 Hop Resistance
3.1.4 Mixed Culture Influence
3.1.5 VBNC
3.2 Carbohydrate Metabolism
3.3 Lactic Acid Production
3.4 Diacetyl and Acetoin
3.5 "Ropy" or "Sick" Beer
3.5.1 Videos
3.6 Bacteriocins
3.7 Malolactic Fermentation
3.8 Biogenic Amines
3.9 Other Metabolites
4 Storage
5 See Also
5.1 Additional Articles on MTF Wiki
5.2 External Resources
6 References
Currently, there are 11 recognized species of Pediococcus. They are P. acidilactici, P. argentinicus, P. cellicola, P.
claussenii, P. damnosus, P. ethanolidurans, P. inopinatus, P. parvulus, P. pentosaceus (subspecies pentosaceus
and intermedius), P. siamensis, and P. stilesii. P. cerevisiae was reclassified into either P. damnosus or P.
pentosaceus. Other species of Pediococcus have also been reclassified to other genera in the last couple of
decades. P. dextrinicus is now classified as Lactobacillus dextrinicus, P. urinae-equi is now classified as
Aerococcus urinae-equi, and P. halophilis is now classified as Tetragenococcus halophilis [13].
Pediococci are described as coccoidal (spherical) or ovoid (egg-shaped) in shape. They are Gram-positive, non-
motile (not capable of moving on their own), and non-spore forming. They are obligate homofermentive and
typically do not produce CO2, ethanol, or acetic acid, although there are a few exceptions to this in the literature.
They do not produce catalase (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catalase) (except for some P. pentocaseus strains
which were reported to have pseudo-catalase activity by Simpson and Taguchi 1995) or oxidase (https://en.wikip
edia.org/wiki/Oxidase) enzymes. Because of the way that Pedioccous cells divide, they often appear stuck
together in pairs or clumps. They are the only lactic acid bacteria found in wine and beer to do this, so they are
easily identifiable at the genus level under a microscope based on their tendency to clump together. When grown
on agar that is supplemented with 100 mg/L of pimaricin, the colonies are white-grey with a diameter of about 1
mm. Ropy strains have a high elasticity, and when touched with a needle, long threads can be drawn and
sometimes the colonies completely stick to the needle. See table 2 from Wade et al. (2018) (https://onlinelibrary.
wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ajgw.12366) for more species identification indicators and what carbohydrates
different species can ferment [13][14].
See also:
Perfect for acidifying unhopped wort quickly for kettle or “quick” sours. At 98F, it’s
capable of achieving a pH of 3.3 within 18 hours. At 84F, it can reach a pH of 3.5
within 24 hours. With more time, a terminal pH of 3.1 may be reached. P.
pentosaceus can also be used for long-term sours. It is capable of growing and
producing lactic acid in worts with IBUs as high as 30, though it is recommended for
Sour unhopped worts as IBUs over 10 may prevent significant quick souring. At ~30 IBU,
Bootleg Weapon P P. souring occurs in 2-3 months [15]. This culture may produce antimicrobials called
Biology/Spot (Pediococcus pentosaceus bacteriocins or pediocins. These can inhibit and kill similar species of bacteria like
Yeast pentosaceus blend Lactobacillus and other Pediococcus species in mixed-culture fermentations. Read
Blend) Bootleg Biology's Facebook post (https://www.facebook.com/BootlegBiology/photos/
a.148869931970401.1073741829.124634287727299/465185997005458/?type=1&the
ater) regarding bacteriocins for more info. No signs of ropiness (exopolysaccharides)
have occurred in testing [16]. It is still unknown how hops will affect souring in a long
term scenario. Bootleg Biology is still researching long term effects and awaiting
peoples feedback as of 5/23/2016.
Isolated from lambic which was refermented with grapes, this strain of Pediococcus
East Coast produces lactic acid, diacetyl, and may cause ropiness in beer. Always add
ECY33 P. parvulus
Yeast
Brettanomyces where Pediococcus is used [17].
Two
Pediococcus
This blend of 2 hop-resistant Pediococcus strains (P. damnosus and P. pentosaceus) is
Escarpment Pediococcus strains (P.
intended for use in long-term souring. Neither strain has been observed to produce
Laboratories Blend damnosus
exopolysaccharides (EPS). We recommend 15 IBU or less in the first generation.
and P.
pentosaceus)
Inland Island Gram positive cocci that produces lactic acid. Also produces diacetyl and several
Yeast INISBC-998 P. damnosus proteins that may cause a "rope" to form in the beer. Rope will disappear with time.
Laboratories Oxygen and hop sensitive. 75-90°F Temperature Range. No longer available.
Mainiacal
P. Isolated from a growing marijuana plant. No production of diacetyl or EPS, with a
Yeast MYPP1
(CLOSED)
pentocaceus clean acidity. Ferment at 70-100°F [18]. Commercial pitches only.
Mainiacal
Isolated from a bottle of belgian lambic. Produces diacetyl and EPS, so use in
Yeast MYPD1 P. damnosus
(CLOSED) conjunction with Brettanomyces. Ferment at 70-90°F [18]. Commercial pitches only.
This modestly hop tolerant Pedio strain produces a clean lactic tang over time. The
strain can produce diacetyl so it is often paired with one or more Brett strains (to
Omega Yeast consume the diacetyl). While more hop tolerant than the Lacto Blend (OYL-605),
OYL-606 P. damnosus IBUs over 5-10 IBU may inhibit souring. Souring time can vary depending on IBU
Labs
level [19]. EPS production is unknown and has not been observed or reported [20].
Commercial pitches only.
Propagate MIP-920 P. damnosus Will sour a finished beer over time to a pH of 3.5 - 3.1. It works well at room
Lab temperature and is hop tolerant. It may produce ropiness [21].
RVA Yeast Lactic acid bacteria used in souring Belgian-style beers such as gueze and Lambic.
RVA 601 P. damnosus
Labs Acid production increases with storage. Temperature range is 60-95°F.
High diacetyl (a.k.a. butter) producer and slow growing. Fermentation temp: 70-85°F
White Labs WLP661 P. damnosus (21-29.4° C). Attenuation: 65%. Cell count: 50-80 million cells/mL [22]. Homebrew
vials contain 35 mL of slurry, and ~1.75-2.8 billion cells per vial [23].
P. damnosus May cause “ropiness” and produce low levels of diacetyl with extended storage time.
(previously
Wyeast 5733 Temp range: 60-95° F (15-35° C). Cell count: 1.0 x 108 (100 million) cells/mL [24].
listed as P.
cerevisiae) Homebrew packs contain 100-125 mL of slurry, and ~10-12.5 billion cells [23].
Manufacturer Tips
This product, which is a blend of Pediococcus pentosaceus, can be used for a kettle souring process or a mixed
fermentation process. Jeff reported good growth results using 2 grams of calcium carbonate (chalk; CaCO3) per
liter of wort for starters of Sour Weapon [25]. This same formula might benefit other Pediococcus starters as well.
The CaCO3 serves as a buffering agent that keeps the starter pH from getting too low too fast, and is similar to
the concept of buffered growth media for Lactobacillus (see Lactobacillus Starter).
"We don't propagate Sour Weapon on plates or at the liquid stage anaerobically, and definitely don't
have problems with growth or souring. We have not tested pitching the culture in aerated wort, but
there's certainly the chance that you could be increasing the likelihood of off flavors. Sour Weapon
does still work very well when co-pitched with yeast in wort that has been aerated though. Hope that
helps." - Jeff Mello of Bootleg Biology [26].
Wyeast on 5733
"If using 1 pack of 5733 per 5 gallon batch; and either adding to secondary after alcoholic
fermentation is complete, or co-inoculating with a Saccharomyces' strain, then a starter would not be
necessary. If you did want or need to propagate, I'd recommend 2 liters of 1.030-1.040 wort per
pack, incubated at 80-90*F, without agitation." - Michael Dawson, Wyeast.
"For propagation, we recommend using 1.040 OG wort and incubating at 30-35*C without aeration
for 48-96 hours; pH drop will indicate when it's ready to pitch. For co-inoculation or post-primary
addition, we recommend 0.5 million cells per mL, which is the equivalent of 1 pack in 5 gallons/20
liters. For larger volumes, you can propagate and inoculate with the starter culture at a rate 2.5-5% of
the total volume of the main batch." - Michael Dawson, Wyeast.
"That one does well in 70-85 deg F. You can do a starter, but you shouldn't have to if you are doing a
5 gallon batch. It does take a while to sour, so just be patient and let it do it's thing." Sarah Neel,
Sales and Customer Service, White Labs
"We just performed an interesting experiment at The Rare Barrel with pedio. Jay, our head brewer
and blender, wanted a more acidic beer that we could use as a blending component while also
growing up our diminishing pedio culture. So we racked 2 oak barrels of gold fermented with
Brettanomyces claussenii and White Labs Pediococcus damnosus (WLP661) into one of our 30 bbl
batches of 12*p gold wort that had been acidified to about 4.5 pH in the kettle using lactic acid (our
first hot side experiment!). No oxygen, really wanted to encourage the bacteria. Within 10 days the
pH was 3.6 and the gravity 10.7. We were all surprised how quickly the pedio was working. We
eventually racked a "splash" of fermenting gold with BSI Brett D and BSI Lacto D to drop the
gravity. The beer had a bright acidity quickly and I was surprised at how well rounded the flavors
were when we racked into barrels after a month in the fermenting vessel.
This might be a little harder to do at home, but I think there's potential for interesting results.
Pediococcus shines long term traditionally so I agree with the posts above, if you're going for quick
acidity I'd go lacto, but I plan on playing around with early Pediococcus fermentations at home." -
Mike Makris from The Rare Barrel [27].
Pediococcus has a reputation for being a "slow worker", meaning that it produces acidity overtime. Staff at The
Rare Barrel noticed that pitching on second generations of White Labs WLP661 Pediococcus might help the
Pediococcus produce acidity very quickly [28] (~19 minutes in). They speculate that oxygen exposure might
inhibit acid production with the White Labs WLP661 P. damnosus strain, however this is purely speculative and
anecdotal [28] (~32 minutes in).
Metabolism
Growth and Environment
Pediococcus generally has a high tolerance to ethanol compared to other bacteria, and can range from 10-25%
ABV, depending on the species and strain. P. damnosus is sensitive to warm temperatures. It is unable to grow at
35°C or higher. The optimal growth occurs at 22°C. Other species can be more tolerant of higher temperatures,
for example, P. parvulus and P. inopinatus have been shown to grow between 12 to 40°C, with rapid death
occuring at 45°C [13]. P. damnosus is sensitive to environments that contain NaCl, and will not grow with
concentrations of 4% NaCl [1]. Most strains of P. claussenii can grow in beer. About half of the strains tested of
P. damnosus can grow in beer, and none to very few strains of P. acidilactici, P. parvulus, and P. pentosaceus
have been found to grow in finished beer.
Another environmental factor that can affect the growth and survival of Pediococcus is pH. P. damnosus is
unable to grow at a pH of 8 or higher. One study showed that optimal growth for P. damnosus was observed in
MRS media (http://www.neogen.com/Acumedia/pdf/ProdInfo/7406_PI.pdf) after ~84 hours with an initial pH of
6.7, and a final pH of 4.14, which occurred naturally from fermentation. The addition of bacteriological peptone,
MnSO4, and Tween 80 also increased activity. Maximum cell densities of P. damnosus are around 4.3 billion
cells/mL in MRS media starting at a pH of 5.5 [29][30], but this is only in optimal conditions. Maximum cell
density varies based on the conditions of the propagation with pH and nutrient demands being two of the main
limiting factors [31].
Although more experiments are probably needed, agitation is believed to be an important factor for any species
of microbe (yeast and bacteria). Gentle stirring on a stir plate or orbital shaker, or frequent gentle manual
agitation leads to faster growth and a higher number of organisms. Agitation keeps the microbes in solution. It
also maximizes the microbes' access to nutrients and disperses waste evenly. In a non-agitated starter, the
microbes are limited to the diffusion rate of nutrients, leading to a slower and more stressful growth [32].
Although Pediococcus are generally considered facultative anaerobes and oxygen usually does not negatively
affect their growth, some strains may show less growth in the presence of oxygen and are considered
anaerophilic, meaning that the presence of oxygen inhibits their growth (and therefore their acid production) but
they can still grow in the presence of O2. The presence of CO2 has a positive effect on acid production [6][14].
Therefore, it is generally best practice to seal the starter with an airlock.
Starter Information
General starter information for commercial Pediococcus cultures is limited. In addition to the various starter
suggestions by various labs regarding their individual cultures, Jeff Mello of Bootleg Biology reported good
growth results when using 2 grams of calcium carbonate (chalk; CaCO3) per liter of wort for starters of Sour
Weapon [25]. This same formula might benefit other Pediococcus starters as well. The CaCO3 serves as a
buffering agent that keeps the starter pH from getting too low too fast, and is similar to the concept of buffered
growth media for Lactobacillus (see Lactobacillus Starter). Starters of P. damnosus cultures could require around
84 hours for optimal growth, however, this time requirement hasn't been looked at in wort starters (only MRS
media) [30].
All species require nicotinic acid (niacin), pantothenic acid (vitamin B5), and biotin (vitamin B7) for growth, so
these vitamins could be added to Pediococcus specific growth media. Other vitamins, such as riboflavin and
pyridoxine, might stimulate growth for some strains of P. damnosus [13].
Sulfur Dioxide
Sulfur dioxide (SO2) in the form of potassium metabisulfite is often used in wine to limit microbiological growth
of yeast and bacteria, and oxidation. SO2 maintains an equilibrium between molecular SO2, bisulfite, and sulfite
ions. The molecular SO2 portion interacts with cell walls because it has no charge, while the rest of the SO2 has
less of an impact on yeast and bacteria cells (but can still have some inmpact on bacterial cells, depending on
species). Below a pH of 3.5, molecular SO2 is higher, but above a pH of 3.5 the SO2 binds more into bisulfite and
sulfite ions, rendering it less effective against microbes. SO2 can also become bound to other compounds such as
acetaldehyde, pyruvic acid, anthocyanins, glucose, and glacturonic acid, which also renders it less effective
against microbes, although they can degrade and release molecular SO2 as well [13].
Pediococcus and other lactic acid bacteria have a wide range of resistance to SO2 depending on species and
strain. One study by Edwards and Jensen (1992) reported that P. parvulus was able to thrive in 20 mg/L of free
SO2 (0.39 mg/L molecular SO2), indicating that small amounts of SO2 are not enough to inhibit Pediococcus.
Other studies have shown that different strains can be inhibited at concentrations between 100-256 mg/L total
SO2 [13].
Hop Resistance
Pediococcus species and strains are generally resistant to hop compounds, and have been reported to grow in
beer with at least 30 IBU [33], and together with Lactobacillus are reported to be responsible for ~70% of all beer
spoilage incidents caused by microbes [12]. It has been suggested by research that horizontal gene transfer
(transfer of genetic material by means other than reproduction) allows Pediococcus species (and other LAB) to
obtain the genes associated with resistance to hops (primarily multi-drug transporter "horA", along with "hitA",
"horC", and "horB" [12]). This has been thought to allow Pediococcus to adapt to living in beer [12][4].
While able to grow in the presence of hops, the presence of hops still inhibits P. damnosus. For example, one
study found that in the presence of 15 IBU, lactic acid production was reduced by ~82%. Exposure to 15 IBU
also increased diacetyl production by 350%, while 2,3-pentanedione (buttery, nutty, toasted, caramellic, diacetyl
and acetoin notes [34]) was decreased by 25%. Interestingly, exposure to 3% ABV and no hops reduced the
production of diacetyl and 2,3-pentanedione by about 20%. The addition of vitamins, specifically thiamine
(vitamin B1) and riboflavin (vitamin B2), increased the production of lactic acid in the presence of 15 IBU or no
hops by about 15-30%. However, thiamine also increased diacetyl production by 100-125% and 2,3-pentadione
production by 20-30% without the presence of hops. In the presence of 15 IBU, thiamine and/or riboflavin
increased diacetyl production by about 26-36% and 2,3-pentadione by about 40-114% [35]. Strains that are grown
exposed to small amounts of iso-alpha acids can be adapted to survive higher amounts up to ~150 μg mL1. The
implications of this in brewing mean that the bacteria can enter any stage of the process and remain in
undetectable amounts until it adapts to higher IBU conditions and then potentially spoils beer [12].
It was reported that Pedioccoccus pentosaceus can be inhibited by iso-alpha acids and beta acids (although beta
acids are not soluble in beer or wort) and that the power of inhibition by these hop acids is greater in beer
fermentation than it is on MRS media due to the lower pH of beer and the presence of ethanol. Hop acids, in
general, lose their antimicrobial properties as the pH of their solution rises to around 5.5 [36]
VBNC
P. damnosus has been found to be able to enter a so-called "viable but nonculturable (VBNC) state" where cells
are not culturable by routine means, but are still alive and recoverable when stress conditions are removed. This
can lead to problems identifying these microorganisms in potentially spoiled products. See Zhenbo Xu et .al
(2021) (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002364382101776X) for potential resuscitation
strategies for P. damnosus.
See also:
Quality Assurance
Carbohydrate Metabolism
fermentation) and has been shown to have more impactful beta-glucosidase activity, P. damnosus is thought to be
less impactful on glycosides. Unlike O. oeni which decreases its enzymatic activity in low pH conditions,
enzymatic activity of P. damnosus is very stable at a pH of 3-4. Very low concentrations of glucose or fructose (1
g/l) inhibit this enzymatic activity in P. damnosus. The presence of alcohol inhibits the alpha-glucosidase activity
in most strains, which might contribute to longer lasting ropiness in beer. The optimal temperature for enzymatic
activity in P. damnosus is between 35-40°C (95-104°F) [37].
P. damnosus can produce high amounts of diacetyl and acetoin during lactic Homofermentative Embden–
acid production [41][42]. Diacetyl is the 'buttery' aroma and flavor found in Meyerhof–Parnas (EMP) pathway
beer (generally not favorable) and in wine (favorable in amounts between 1- for the production of lactic acid,
4 mg/L). While other microbes found in beer and wine fermentation (namely acetoin, diacetyl and 2,3-butanediol
Saccharomyces cerevisiae) can also produce diacetyl, Pediococcus and other and acetic acid production from
lactic acid bacteria are known to be able to produce much higher amounts citrate metabolism. Image by Wade
[13]. et al (2018). (https://onlinelibrary.wil
ey.com/doi/full/10.1111/ajgw.12366)
In lactic acid bacteria, diacetyl can be the byproduct of both
homofermentative metabolism of sugars as well as the metabolism of citric
acid, and it is a way for the cells to regenerate NADP+. In either of these two pathways, extra pyruvate is turned
into alpha-acetolactate which then undergoes an oxidative decarboxylation reaction to produce diacetyl. Diacetyl
is often reduced by yeast to acetoin and/or 2,3-butanediol, which have a higher threshold and less of an impact on
the finished beer/wine [13]. In mixed fermentation sour beer, the breakdown of diacetyl into acetoin and 2,3-
butanediol is often thought to be carried out by Brettanomyces in a similar way to Saccharomyces species, but
this has not been investigated that we are aware of. It has been reported that diacetyl reduction is faster at a lower
pH of around 3.5, which is a typical pH range for sour beer and might be one of the contributing factors to a lack
of anecdotal reports of diacetyl in sour beer [43][44].
Several variables the affect diacetyl and acetoin production have been identified. First of all, some strains of
Pediococcus species produce diacetyl, and others do not. During malolactic fermentation (conversion of citric
acid to lactic acid), the temperature at which MLF is conducted can influence whether or not diacetyl is
https://www.milkthefunk.com/wiki/Pediococcus Page 9 sur 19
Pediococcus - Milk The Funk Wiki 11/05/2023 21:09
produced. For example, two studies reported that more diacetyl and acetoin were produced during the MLF in
wine at 18°C compared at 25°C. The effect of temperature is not well understood, but it has been hypothesized
that it could be that at lower temperature yeast is less active and thus cannot break the diacetyl down to acetoin
and 2,3-butanediol (extended time exposed to active yeast or on lees can reduce diacetyl in wine and probably
also beer). If SO2 is used, it can bind to diacetyl in a form that cannot be tasted, although the SO2 can become
unbound and release the diacetyl again. An increase in citric acid can also lead to more diacetyl under semi-
aerobic conditions but not anaerobic conditions. The presence of glucose has also been associated with higher
levels of diacetyl production in wine [13].
immediately disappeared. However, exposing ropy beer to air is not an acceptable method for dealing with
ropiness due to oxidation and acetic acid production in sour beer when it is exposed to oxygen [14]. The exact
enzymatic activity for how Brettanomyces (or other microorganisms) break down EPS from Pediococcus is not
well characterized, but it could be due to alpha-glucosidase activity in those yeasts (see Brettanomyces
metabolism and Carbohydrate Metabolism above).
This "ropiness" is caused by production of exopolysaccharides (EPS) in the form of β-glucans (beta glucans) by
some strains Pediococcus and some other lactic acid bacteria species. Ropiness also contains 4-15% proteins and
nucleic acid in the form of RNA [14]. The β-glucans are made up of beta 1, 3 linkages and beta 1, 2 branches
composed of single units [13]. A small amount (20-30 mg/L [13]) of β-glucan is adequate enough to affect the
visible viscosity of beer or wine. The gene known as "dps" has been identified with the production of β-
glucan/EPS in P. damnosus, and the gene "gtf" in P.
claussenii [4]. Not all strains of P. damnosus express the
gene, and only ones that do will cause a beer to go ropy.
Although it is not needed to survive in beer, EPS production
is probably has importance in biofilm production [50], and
pediococci that are ropy have been found to be more acid,
alcohol, and SO2 tolerant than other pediococci. The
thickness of the ropiness is increased with the presence of
malic acid [46]. While strains of P. damnosus and P. parvulus
are the Pediococcus species most associated with ropiness,
some strains of P. pentosaceus have also been found to
produce EPS [13].
Temperature and nitrogen levels also affect how much EPS is produced. One study found that at 12°C both
growth and EPS production was much slower than at 25°C. After 29 days in agar media, the EPS in the 12°C
samples tended to reach or slightly exceed the levels in the 25°C samples, which developed equivilant levels of
EPS (or slightly less) within 7-13 days. Nitrogen levels also play a significant role, according to this study,
particularly at lower fermentation temperatures. At 12°C, nitrogen was more important for the formation of EPS
than glucose (although glucose was found to be the most important factor in EPS development overall, which is
in agreement with the previously cited study). At 25°C nitrogen levels played a significant role in producing EPS,
however less so than glucose levels. In general though, higher availability of nitrogen complimented higher
levels of glucose to produce more EPS (and faster/higher cell growth) [51]. Stress in the environment such as
ethanol and SO2 has also been shown to induce EPS production, and a lack of available glucose has been
associated with eliminating the production of EPS (e.g. malolactic fermentation by Pediococcus in wine tends
not to produce EPS, perhaps due to the lack of glucose in the environment) [13].
The presence of beta-glucans from barley have been observed to extend both the growth and the viability of
Lactobacillus species in probiotics, indicating that ropiness might be a stress response [52][53]. One study looked
at this effect in beta-glucans produced by Pediococcus parvulus and found that L. plantarum had a longer
viability in a fermented medium with no additional food source when that medium was first fermented with P.
parvulus and EPS was produced. The L. plantarum strain that was tested did not ferment the beta-glucans. This
suggests that there is an interspecies simbiotic relationship between lactic acid bacteria that produce EPS and
those that don't, and when EPS is produced (beta-glucans are present) the bacteria survive longer. The study also
observed that more EPS was produced in an oat based wort and a rice based wort, while no EPS was produced in
a barley based wort, suggesting that different food sources influence whether or not EPS is produced [54]. Pittet et
al. (2011) found that the presence of the EPS genes in lactic acid bacteria did not correspond with the ability to
survive beer-level ethanol levels or higher, which led to the hypothesis that perhaps EPS provides LAB a way to
assist in the formation of biofilm, although this has yet to be demonstrated scientifically [55]. Along these same
lines, Coulon et al. (2012) (https://www.academia.edu/27927065/Lysozyme_resistance_of_the_ropy_strain_Pedi
ococcus_parvulus_IOEB_8801_is_correlated_with_beta_glucan_accumulation_around_the_cell) reported that an
EPS producing strain of Pediococcus parvulus was more resistant to the antimicrobial enzyme lysozyme (https://
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysozyme), which is often added to wine to kill lactic acid bacteria. The beta-glucan EPS
formed a "coat" around the cells of the bacteria, thus protecting it from the lysozyme enzyme. When a beta-
glucanase enzyme was added to break down the EPS produced by the bacteria, the beta-glucan "coat"
disappeared from the cell walls and the lysozyme was once again effective at killing this strain of Pediococcus
[56].
It has been observed that Lactobacillus species can produce EPS (Lactococcus lactis, Lactobacillus delbrueckii,
Lactobacillus casei, and Lactobacillus helveticus) [46]. Some species of yeast can also produce EPS, including
Candida, Cryptococcus, Debaryomyces, Lipomyces, Pichia [57], Pseudozyma, Rhodotorula and Sporobolomyces
[58]
Videos
Highly viscous ropy beer video posted in MTF by Roi Funk Krispen. (https://www.facebook.com/groups/
MilkTheFunk/permalink/4547361381958707/)
Post on MTF by Brandon Jones showing initial ropiness of a beer, and then after aging the ropiness out for
8 weeks. (https://www.facebook.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/3478055812222608/)
Other videos on MTF of ropy beer. (https://www.facebook.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/18130223
88725967/)
Bacteriocins
Some strains of Pediococcus pentocaseus have been found to produce bacteriocins, which are toxins that are
produced by the cells that inhibit the growth of other types of bacteria. For example, Bootleg Biology's "Sour
Weapon" culture produces antimicrobials called bacteriocins or pediocins (see Bootleg Biology's Facebook post (
https://www.facebook.com/BootlegBiology/photos/a.148869931970401.1073741829.124634287727299/465185
997005458/?type=1&theater) regarding bacteriocins for more info). These can inhibit and kill similar species of
bacteria like Lactobacillus and other Pediococcus species in mixed-culture fermentations. Bacteriocin production
can be higher when Pediococcus pentocaseus is co-fermented with other bacteria than when it is fermented on its
own [59]. A strain of Pediococcus pentocaseus was found to produce a "class II" enteriocin that inhibits the
growth of E. coli and Staphylococcus aureus [60]. P. damnosus also produces an antimicrobial compound called
pediocin PD-1, which can inhibit several bacteria spp including O. oeni [61][62].
See also:
Lactobacillus bacteriocins.
Malolactic Fermentation
See the Cider page.
Biogenic Amines
Biogenic amines are produced by all living things and are present in many fermented beverages. High dosages
can lead to health issues such as vomiting, headache, asthma, hypotension, and cardiac palpitation. Thus,
biogenic amines have been studied intensely [13]. For more information on biogenic amines in beer in general,
see "Fact or Fiction – Biogenic Amines in Beer" by Dr. Bryan Heit (http://suigenerisbrewing.com/index.php/201
9/01/22/biogenic-amines/).
Some strains of lactic acid bacteria, including Pediococcus, can metabolize amino acids into biogenic amines,
and potentially also degrade them [63][64]. The number of strains capable of producing biogenic amines appears
to be very low. Weiller and Radler (1976) (https://link.springer.com/pdf%2F10.1007%2FBF01105812) found that
only one out 28 strains of P. cerevisiae (later reclassified to P. damnosus and P. pentosaceus) produced biogenic
amines. Strickland et al. (2016) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/973463) found that out of multiple
species of Pediococcus, only one strain of P. inopinatus produced biogenic amines, and it only produced 3.3
mg/L of histamine. García-Ruiz et al. (2011) (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016816051100
2893) reported that 9 out of 85 strains of P. parvulus and P. pentosaceus were able to degrade some biogenic
amines (histamine, tyrosine, and putrescine) in culture media, but were unable to do so in wine, indicating that
any degradation of biogenic amines in wine that might occur is not likely due to lactic acid bacteria, but due to
some other cause [13].
Izquierdo-Pulido et al. (1995) found that out of 35 samples of Spanish lagers contaminated with Pediococcus, 21
of them had final tyramine levels between 5-10 mg/l, 6 of them had no detected tyramine, and 8 of them had high
levels around 25 mg/l, with higher levels being correlated to higher cell counts of Pediococcus. higher levels of
tyramine were associated with higher cell counts of the tyramine-producing strains during smaller bench test
fermentations as well. There was no correlation between the presence of wild yeast and tyramine production.
Filtration and pasteurization after fermentation had no effect on the levels of tyramine in the final beers [65].
See also:
19/01/22/biogenic-amines/)
Follow up from Dr. Heit on MTF on "allergic-like" reactions to biogenic amines. (https://www.faceb
ook.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/2570617069633158/?comment_id=2570641549630710&r
eply_comment_id=2570664762961722&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R8%22%7D)
Other Metabolites
P. claussenii tends to produce a smaller amount of acetic acid than lactic acid in about a 1:3 ratio. P. damnosus
tends to produce only lactic acid and no acetic acid [33], although some strains have been found to produce small
amounts of acetic acid of around 100-300 ppm. This level is slightly below and above flavor thresholds in lager
beer (but could be additive with other organisms) [66], but significantly less than the total acetic acid often found
in gueuze (around 700-2200 ppm [67]) and Flanders reds (300-2300 ppm [68]). Pediococcus also carries the
decarboxylase enzyme (PAD) which converts hydroxycinnamic acid (ferulic acid) into phenols (4-vinyl guaiacol)
[69].
While Pediococcus has been linked to the creation of acrolein via the metabolism of glycerol, evidence supports
that this is very rare in Pediococcus species. In wine, acrolein reacts with anthocyanins and other phenols to
produce an intense bitterness. Acrolein production in wine has been linked to some strains of Lactobacillus.
Some strains of Pediococcus have been found to metabolize gylcerol in beer and wine under aerobic and semi-
aerobic environments, but the metabolism of glycerol in the presence of oxygen results in the production of lactic
acid, acetic acid, diacetyl, and 2,3-butanediol, and not acrolein [13].
Storage
For instructions on how to make slants at home capable of storing any microbe for potentially 2+ years, see
Bryan's video on Sui Generis Brewing (requires a pressure cooker) (http://suigenerisbrewing.blogspot.com/2015/
11/easy-home-yeast-banking-and-video.html).
Justin Amaral recommends using isotonic sodium chloride and freezing media that is meant for 32°F freezers
(lasts around 2 years) [70].
See Also
Additional Articles on MTF Wiki
External Resources
UC Davis article stub on Pediococcus damnosus. (http://wineserver.ucdavis.edu/industry/enology/winemic
ro/winebacteria/pediococcus_damnosus.html)
The Genera of Lactic Acid Bacteria, by W.H.N Holzapfel, Brian J.B. Wood. Partially free. (https://books.g
oogle.com/books?id=hPjpBwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false)
MTF Thread with Bryan from Sui Generis on suggestions/theories on selecting for Pediococcus on plates.
(https://www.facebook.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/1247801211914757/?comment_id=12478306
31911815&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R0%22%7D)
Dan Pixley's comparison between White Labs, Wyeast, and Inland Island Pediococcus cultures. (https://w
ww.youtube.com/watch?v=a--DVtJtU4A)
References
1. Viticulture & Enology. UC Davis website. Pedioccous damnosus. Retrieved 07/28/2015. (http://wineserver.
ucdavis.edu/industry/enology/winemicro/winebacteria/pediococcus_damnosus.html)
2. The Microbial Diversity of Traditional Spontaneously Fermented Lambic Beer. Freek Spitaels, Anneleen
D. Wieme, Maarten Janssens, Maarten Aerts, Heide-Marie Daniel, Anita Van Landschoot, Luc De Vuyst,
Peter Vandamme. April 18, 2014. (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.009538
4)
3. Multiple Scientific publications linked on MTF.
4. Comparative genome analysis of Pediococcus damnosus LMG 28219, a strain well-adapted to the beer
environment. Isabel Snauwaert, Pieter Stragier, Luc De Vuyst and Peter Vandamme. 2015. (http://www.bio
medcentral.com/content/pdf/s12864-015-1438-z.pdf)
5. Lactic Acid Bacteria. Todar's Online Texbook of Bacteriology. Kenneth Todar, PhD. Pg 1. Retrieved
08/09/2015. (http://textbookofbacteriology.net/lactics.html)
6. TAXONOMIC STUDIES ON THE GENUS PEDIOCOCCUS. ATSUSHI NAKAGAWA, KAKUO
KITAHARA. 1959. (https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jgam1955/5/3/5_3_95/_article)
7. THE NUTRITION AND PHYSIOLOGY OF THE GENUS PEDIOCOCCUS. Erling M. Jensen and Harry
W. Seeley. 1954. (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC357257/)
8. Pediocins: The bacteriocins of pediococci. Sources, production, properties and applications. Maria
Papagianni and Sofia Anastasiadou. 2009. (http://www.microbialcellfactories.com/content/8/1/3#B5)
9. Comparative genome analysis of Pediococcus damnosus LMG 28219, a strain well-adapted to the beer
environment. Isabel Snauwaert, Pieter Stragier, Luc De Vuyst and Peter Vandamme. April 2015. (http://ww
w.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/16/267)
10. Poll on Milk The Funk regarding how long ropy beer has been observed. 08/20/2015. (https://www.facebo
ok.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/1132030550158491/)
11. Cilurzo, Vinnie. AHA Sour Beer presentation. 2007. (http://www.xxlbrewing.com/hb/sour_beer/img_09.ht
ml)
12. Pediococcus damnosus strains isolated from a brewery environment carry the horA gene. Jorge Hugo
Garcia-Garcia, Luis Cástulo Damas-Buenrostro, Juan Carlos Cabada-Amaya, Myriam Elias-Santos, Benito
Pereyra-Alférez. 2017. DOI: 10.1002/jib.397. (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jib.397/abstract)
13. Role of Pediococcus in winemaking. M.E. Wade, M.T. Strickland, J.P. Osborn, C.G. Edwards. 2018. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajgw.12366. (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ajgw.12366)
14. D. Van Oevelen & H. Verachtert (1979) Slime Production by Brewery Strains of Pediococcus Cerevisiae,
Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists, 37:1, 34-37, DOI: 10.1094/ASBCJ-37-0034. (https:
//www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1094/ASBCJ-37-0034)
15. Justin Amaral and Per Karlsson on Bootleg biology Sour Weapon hop tolerance. milk The Funk Facebook
group. 11/2/2017. (https://www.facebook.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/1302981419730069/?com
ment_id=1870460696315469&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R0%22%7D)
16. Bootleg Biology website. Retrieved 05/06/2016. (http://bootlegbiology.com/product/sour-weapon-pedioco
ccus-pentosaceus-blend/)
17. "Wild Yeast / Brettanomyces / Lactic Bacteria". East Coast Yeast website. Retrieved 04/27/2018. (http://w
ww.eastcoastyeast.com/wild-stuff.html)
18. Private correspondence with Justin Amaral by Dan Pixley. 01/24/2018.
19. Pediococcus OYL-606. Omega Yeast Labs website. Retrieved 06/11/2019. (https://omegayeast.com/yeast/
bacterial-cultures/pediococcus)
https://www.milkthefunk.com/wiki/Pediococcus Page 15 sur 19
Pediococcus - Milk The Funk Wiki 11/05/2023 21:09
bacterial-cultures/pediococcus)
20. Adi Hastings. Milk The Funk Facebook group on OYL Pediococcus EPS production. 06/11/2019. (https://
www.facebook.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/2719576444737219/?comment_id=27199635480318
42&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R%22%7D)
21. Propagate Labs website. MIP-920. Retrieved 06/20/2020. (http://www.propagatelab.com/mip-920pedioda
mn)
22. Private correspondence with White Labs Customer Service and Dan Pixley. 10/29/2015.
23. Conversation with Richard Priess regarding WL and Wyeast homebrew pitches. 10/30/2015. (https://www.
facebook.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/1170980479596831/?comment_id=1171066879588191&re
ply_comment_id=1171595552868657&total_comments=6&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22
R9%22%7D)
24. Wyeast Specifications 2015 Retail Products. 2015. (https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B8CshC9nx
YHdZmE4MmoyLXA2WVk&usp=sharing)
25. Conversation on MTF with Jeff Mello regarding starters for Pediococcus. 08/08/2016. (https://www.facebo
ok.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/1369904163037794/?comment_id=1370329352995275&reply_co
mment_id=1370751796286364&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R5%22%7D)
26. Discussion with Jeff Mello on MTF regarding Sour Weapon and oxygen. 09/27/2016. (https://www.facebo
ok.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/1418878731473670/?comment_id=1419061968122013&commen
t_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R%22%7D)
27. Conversation with Mike Makris on Milk The Funk. (https://www.facebook.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/per
malink/1041019779259569/?comment_id=1041073789254168&offset=0&total_comments=8)
28. The Sour Hour Episode 29 on The Brewing Network, interview with The Rare Barrel staff. 02/19/2016. (ht
tp://www.thebrewingnetwork.com/the-sour-hour-episode-29/)
29. Conversation with Richard Preiss on MTF regarding Pediococcus cell density. 07/19/2016. (https://www.fa
cebook.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/1347683325259878/?comment_id=1349386438422900&repl
y_comment_id=1350340544994156&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R%22%7D)
30. Growth optimization of Pediococcus damnosus NCFB 1832 and the influence of pH and nutrients on the
production of pediocin PD-1. Nel HA, Bauer R, Vandamme EJ, Dicks LM. 2001. (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih
.gov/pubmed/11851822)
31. Neva Parker, Reddit thread. 10/29/2015. (https://www.reddit.com/r/Homebrewing/comments/3qp7b7/adva
nced_brewers_round_table_neva_parker_white/cwh7iqq)
32. Conversation with Bryan of Sui Generis Blog about starters and agitation. 11/09/2015. (https://www.facebo
ok.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/1168024059892473/?comment_id=1174865305875015&reply_co
mment_id=1176092372418975&total_comments=1&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R9%22
%7D)
33. Metabolic strategies of beer spoilage lactic acid bacteria in beer. Andreas J. Geissler, Jürgen Behr, Kristina
von Kamp, Rudi F. Vogel. 2015. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168160515301033)
34. "acetyl propionyl ". The Good Scents Company. Retrieved 01/18/2017. (http://www.thegoodscentscompan
y.com/data/rw1003991.html)
35. The influence of thiamine and riboflavin on various spoilage microorganisms commonly found in beer.
Barry Hucker, Melinda Christophersen, Frank Vriesekoop. 2017. (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.100
2/jib.385/full)
36. Inhibitory Effects of Iso-α and β Hop Acids Against Pediococcus pentosaceus. Delia MICHIU, Frank
DELVIGNE, Nicolas MABON, Mirela JIMBOREAN, Melinda FOGARASI, Mihaela MIHAI, Maria
TOFANĂ, Philippe THONART. 2019. (https://www.notulaebotanicae.ro/index.php/nbha/article/view/1168
7)
37. Screening of Lactobacillus spp. and Pediococcus spp. for glycosidase activities that are important in
oenology. A. Grimaldi, E. Bartowsky, V. Jiranek. 2005. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02707.x. (http://on
linelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02707.x/full)
38. Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology. Pediococcus. Carl A. Batt. Academic Press, Sep 28, 1999 . (https://bo
oks.google.com/books?id=1b1CAgAAQBAJ&pg=RA2-PA1&lpg=RA2-PA1&dq=pediococcus+damnosus
+homolactic&source=bl&ots=myI2alVB78&sig=cG-yWB4GuABQFEtqD2CAyKmU0TE&hl=en&sa=X
&ved=0CEAQ6AEwBGoVChMI66C5593-xgIVCVKICh3Pcg7c#v=onepage&q=pediococcus%20damnos
us%20homolactic&f=false)
https://www.milkthefunk.com/wiki/Pediococcus Page 16 sur 19
Pediococcus - Milk The Funk Wiki 11/05/2023 21:09
us%20homolactic&f=false)
39. A Genomic View of Lactobacilli and pediococci Demonstrates that Phylogeny Matches Ecology and
Physiology. Jinshui Zheng, Lifang Ruan, Ming Sun and Michael Gänzle. 2015. (http://aem.asm.org/content
/81/20/7233.full)
40. Citrate Metabolism by Pediococcus halophilus. Chiyuki Kanbe, Kinji Uchida. 1987. (https://aem.asm.org/c
ontent/53/6/1257.short)
41. Identification of pediococci by ribotyping. R. Satokari, T. Mattila-Sandholm and M.L. Suihko. Journal of
Applied Microbiology 2000, 88, 260–265. (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.0
0956.x/pdf)
42. The Microbiology of Malting and Brewing. Nicholas A. Bokulicha, and Charles W. Bamforth. June 2013. (
http://mmbr.asm.org/content/77/2/157.full)
43. Michel, M., Meier-Dörnberg, T., Jacob, F., Methner, F. -J., Wagner, R. S., and Hutzler, M. (2016) Review:
Pure non-Saccharomyces starter cultures for beer fermentation with a focus on secondary metabolites and
practical applications. J. Inst. Brew., 122: 569– 587. doi: 10.1002/jib.381. (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/
doi/full/10.1002/jib.381)
44. Krogerus, K. and Gibson, B.R. (2013), 125th Anniversary Review: Diacetyl and its control during brewery
fermentation. J. Inst. Brew., 119: 86-97. https://doi.org/10.1002/jib.84. (https://www.researchgate.net/publi
cation/259331290_125th_Anniversary_Review_Diacetyl_and_its_control_during_brewery_fermentation)
45. Conversation with Stuart Grant on MTF. 09/16/2015. (https://www.facebook.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/pe
rmalink/1148859311808948/)
46. Glucose fermentation kinetics and exopolysaccharide production by ropy Pediococcus damnosus
IOEB8801. Emilie Walling, Marguerite Dols-Lafargue, Aline Lonvaud-Funel. Food Microbiology Volume
22, Issue 1, January 2005, Pages 71–78. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074000200400
0668)
47. True Lambic: Sick beers and the magic of Cantillon. Beer By Bart blog. Gail Ann Williams. 04/03/2011.
Retrieved 04/23/2016. (https://beerbybart.com/2011/04/03/true-lambic-jean-van-roy-cantillon-sick-beer/)
48. Matt Humbard and Joe Idoni. Milk The Funk Facebook group. 04/29/2017. (https://www.facebook.com/gr
oups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/1670311836330357/?comment_id=1670331339661740&comment_tracking
=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R0%22%7D)
49. Richard Preiss. Milk The Funk Facebook group thread on the frequency of Pediococcus caused ropiness.
08/20/2019. (https://www.facebook.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/2859721020722760/?comment_i
d=2859868767374652&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R%22%7D)
50. Ethanol tolerance of lactic acid bacteria, including relevance of the exopolysaccharide gene gtf. Pittet V,
Morrow K, Ziola B. 2011. (http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=23890699)
51. Exopolysaccharide production by Pediococcus damnosus 2.6 in a semidefined medium under different
growth conditions. Maite Dueñas, Arantza Munduate, Aidé Perea, Ana Irastorza. 2003. (https://www.scien
cedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168160503000606)
52. Barley β-Glucans-Containing Food Enhances Probiotic Performances of Beneficial Bacteria. Mattia P.
Arena, Graziano Caggianiello, Daniela Fiocco, Pasquale Russo, Michele Torelli, Giuseppe Spano, and
Vittorio Capozzi. 2014. (http://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/15/2/3025/htm)
53. Beta-Glucans Improve Growth, Viability and Colonization of Probiotic Microorganisms. Pasquale Russo,
Paloma López, Vittorio Capozzi, Pilar Fernández de Palencia, María Teresa Dueñas, Giuseppe Spano, and
Daniela Fiocco. 2012. (http://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/13/5/6026/htm)
54. In Situ β-Glucan Fortification of Cereal-Based Matrices by Pediococcus parvulus. Adrián Pérez-Ramos,
María Luz Mohedano, Paloma López, Giuseppe Spano, Daniela Fiocco, Pasquale Russo, and Vittorio
Capozzi. 2017. (http://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/18/7/1588/htm)
55. Ethanol Tolerance of Lactic Acid Bacteria, Including Relevance of the Exopolysaccharide Gene Gtf.
Vanessa Pittet and Kendra Morrow and Barry Ziola. 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/ASBCJ-2011-
0124-01. (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1094/ASBCJ-2011-0124-01)
56. Coulon, Joana et al. “Lysozyme Resistance of the Ropy Strain Pediococcus Parvulus IOEB 8801 Is
Correlated with Beta-Glucan Accumulation around the Cell.” International Journal of Food Microbiology
159.1 (2012): 25–29. Web. (https://www.academia.edu/27927065/Lysozyme_resistance_of_the_ropy_strai
n_Pediococcus_parvulus_IOEB_8801_is_correlated_with_beta_glucan_accumulation_around_the_cell)
57. Zach Taggart. Milk the Funk Facebook group post on EPS from yeast. 01/16/2019. (https://www.facebook.
https://www.milkthefunk.com/wiki/Pediococcus Page 17 sur 19
Pediococcus - Milk The Funk Wiki 11/05/2023 21:09
57. Zach Taggart. Milk the Funk Facebook group post on EPS from yeast. 01/16/2019. (https://www.facebook.
com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/2465980936763439/)
58. Exopolysaccharides from yeast: insight into optimal conditions for biosynthesis, chemical composition and
functional properties - review. Iwona Gientka, Stanisław Błażejak, Stanisław Błażejak, Lidia Stasiak, Lidia
Stasiak, Anna Chlebowska-Śmigiel, Anna Chlebowska-Śmigiel. 2015. (https://www.researchgate.net/publi
cation/283498621_Exopolysaccharides_from_yeast_insight_into_optimal_conditions_for_biosynthesis_ch
emical_composition_and_functional_properties_-_review?fbclid=IwAR1X6Y0rnquoF6SD-eH9m6EWpLI
efgZJFUJK51NJYBooJWngxEVS2aR3PKE)
59. Enhanced Bacteriocin Production by Pediococcus pentosaceus 147 in Co-Culture with Lactobacillus
plantarum LE27 on Cheese Whey Broth. Carolina Gutiérrez-Cortés, Héctor Suarez, Gustavo Buitrago,
Luis A. Nero and Svetoslav D. Todorov. 2018. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02952. (https://www.frontiersin.o
rg/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02952/abstract)
60. Antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus plantarum isolated from Tibetan yaks. Lei Wang, Hui Zhang,
Mujeeb Ur Rehman, Khalid Mehmood, Xiong Jiang, Mujahid Iqbal, Xiaole Tong, Xing Gao, Jiakui Li.
2017. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0882401017314559)
61. Growth optimization of Pediococcus damnosus NCFB 1832 and the influence of pH and nutrients on the
production of pediocin PD-1. H.A. Nel1, R. Bauer, E.J. Vandamme and L.M.T. Dicks. Jan 2002. (http://onl
inelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01486.x/full)
62. Purification, partial amino acid sequence and mode of action of pediocin PD-1, a bacteriocin produced by
Pediococcus damnosus NCFB 1832. Bauer R, Chikindas ML, Dicks LM. May 2005. (http://www.ncbi.nlm.
nih.gov/pubmed/15878403)
63. Tyramine Formation by Pediococcus spp. during Beer Fermentation. MARIA IZQUlERDO-PULIDO,
JOSEP-MIQUEL CARCELLER-ROSA, ABEL MARINE-FONT, and M. CARMEN VIDAL-CAROU.
1996. (https://watermark.silverchair.com/0362-028x-60_7_831.pdf)
64. Effect of tyrosin on tyramin formation during beer fermentation. Maria Izquierdo-Pulido, M. Carmen
Vidal-Carou. 2000. (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240429641_Effect_of_tyrosin_on_tyramin_f
ormation_during_beer_fermentation)
65. Biogenic Amine Changes Related to Lactic Acid Bacteria During Brewing. MARIAI ZQUIERDO-
PULIDO, JUDIT FONT-FABREGAS, JOSEP-MIQUEL CARCELLER-ROSA, ABEL MARINE-FONT,
and CARMENVIDAL-CAROU. 1995. (https://watermark.silverchair.com/0362-028x-59_2_175.pdf)
66. Isolation, Identification, and Characterisation of Beer-Spoilage Lactic Acid Bacteria from Microbrewed
Beer from Victoria, Australia. Garry Menz, Christian Andrighetto, Angiolella Lombardi, Viviana Corich,
Peter Aldred, Frank Vriesekoop. 2010. (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2050-0416.2010.tb003
93.x/abstract)
67. Jansen, Dave. Hors Category Blog. "Duivelsbier of Halle". 07/30/2016. Retrieved 01/31/2018. (http://www
.horscategoriebrewing.com/2016/07/duivelsbier-of-halle.html)
68. Microbial diversity and metabolite composition of Belgian red-brown acidic ales. Isabel Snauwaert, Sanne
P. Roels, Filip Van Nieuwerburg, Anita Van Landschoot, Luc De Vuyst, Peter Vandamme. 2015. (http://ww
w.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168160515301896)
69. The Impact of Simple Phenolic Compounds on Beer Aroma and Flavor. Michael Lentz. 2018. doi:
10.3390/fermentation4010020. (http://www.mdpi.com/2311-5637/4/1/20/html#B13-fermentation-04-0002
0)
70. Justin Amaral. Milk The Funk Facebook comment on storing Pediococcus. 10/23/2017. (https://www.face
book.com/groups/MilkTheFunk/permalink/1859788084049397/?comment_id=1859790364049169&comm
ent_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R0%22%7D)