0% found this document useful (0 votes)
298 views4 pages

Zerto vs. iland DRaaS Cost Analysis

This document compares the total cost of ownership of using Zerto disaster recovery in Azure versus iland's disaster recovery as a service. It finds that iland DRaaS can provide disaster recovery for less than half the price of a customer-implemented Zerto solution in Azure across small, medium, and large environments over 36 months. The Zerto in Azure solution would also require additional ongoing management costs not accounted for in the TCO model. Key cost differences that contribute to iland's lower TCO include storage, compute, networking, security, support, licensing and management costs.

Uploaded by

adm cdds
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
298 views4 pages

Zerto vs. iland DRaaS Cost Analysis

This document compares the total cost of ownership of using Zerto disaster recovery in Azure versus iland's disaster recovery as a service. It finds that iland DRaaS can provide disaster recovery for less than half the price of a customer-implemented Zerto solution in Azure across small, medium, and large environments over 36 months. The Zerto in Azure solution would also require additional ongoing management costs not accounted for in the TCO model. Key cost differences that contribute to iland's lower TCO include storage, compute, networking, security, support, licensing and management costs.

Uploaded by

adm cdds
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

BRIEF

The True Costs of


Zerto DR in the Cloud.
Comparing iland DRaaS to Zerto DR in Azure.
iland has become a leader in disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS)
by working with leading vendors like Zerto to create simple and
robust replication and failover solutions.

However, Zerto offers many paths to implementing disaster recovery (DR) infrastructure in the
cloud, including a customer-implemented (DIY) solution utilizing Azure that may seem deceptively
simple at first glance. Developing a true total cost of ownership (TCO) between the two requires a
detailed analysis of a variety of costs to create a true comparison. The details will vary, but utilizing
conservative numbers applied to the chart on the second page of this brief, iland can provide a much
simpler DR solution for less than half the price, no matter the size of the protected infrastructure.

S/M/L - 36 month TCO excluding FTE

Large (1000 VMs)

Medium (200 VMs)

Small (50 VMs)

$ $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000

Zerto + Azure Difference iland

In addition to these raw service costs, it is important to keep in mind that the DIY nature of a Zerto
solution in Azure will naturally increase the staff time spent on the solution, especially for the initial
implementation, but also throughout the life of the solution and during failovers. Given the high
variability of these costs they were not included in this cost model, but should be added to any
detailed analysis, and will only further differentiate the TCO of the two solutions.

2
The following items were used to develop the above cost model, and represent a complete DR
target environment.

INFRASTRUCTURE
iland COST MODEL AZURE COST MODEL NOTES
COMPONENT

In addition to transaction fees, be


Per reserved GB and
Replicated storage Per reserved GB aware of limitations imposed on
transactions
storage pools

• Charges incurred only during test


CPU Per Ghz
or failover.
• An instance of equal or greater
size must be selected for each VM
Per instance deployed
when configuring protection to
Azure. For iland, the recovery VM
Memory Per GB
will have the same configuration
as the protected VM.

iland provides much more


VPN included
Additional cost per VPN or flexibility for connecting into
Network connectivity Additional cost for dedicated connection the DR environment, including
dedicated connections customer-provided equipment.

Available on a per GB cost Additional cost per VM Additional costs for restorations
Backup
based on primary storage and GB may apply in Azure

Ingress: Included Bandwidth charges between


vNETs and reverse replication for
Bandwidth Included Egress: Per GB
failback operations could result in
Cross vNET: Per GB unexpected steep costs in Azure

Included (anti-malware, IDS/ Customer must deploy and manage


Additional cost per VM
Security in DR IPS, vulnerability scanning, multiple services in Azure to create
and transaction
and web reputation services) a comparable solution to iland

At a minimum, there should be a


Additional cost per instance firewall and VPN for both replication
Virtual gateways Included
and bandwidth and failover networks. iland fully
manages the replication firewall

To match iland’s included


Self service support (KBs) or phone-based support, Azure
Support Included
additional cost customers would need to add
premium support

Additional cost and contract All needed Zerto licensing is


Zerto licensing Included for Zerto Enterprise Cloud included with iland (no additional
Edition licensing on-prem licenses needed)

Additional cost for always on All Zerto components in the iland


Included and managed by
Failover Zerto infrastructure instances for ZCA (DS3 v2) infrastructure are fully managed
iland
and customer management by iland

For more details on this analysis, including an estimation of the additional management cost differences,
please see the full whitepaper or work with your iland sales representative.

3
Thank you.

About iland

iland is a global cloud service provider of secure and compliant hosting for North America: +1.800.697.7088
infrastructure (IaaS), disaster recovery (DRaaS), and backup as a service (BaaS). UK: +44 20.7096.0149
Netherlands: +31 10.808.0440
They are recognized by industry analysts as a leader in disaster recovery. The Singapore: +65 3158.8438
award-winning iland Secure Cloud Console natively combines deep layered Australia: +61 2.9056.7004
security, predictive analytics, and compliance to deliver unmatched visibility and
ease of management for all of iland’s cloud services. Headquartered in Houston,
Texas, London, UK, and Sydney, Australia, iland delivers cloud services throughout
North America, Europe, Australia and Asia. Learn more at iland.com

iland, the iland logo, and all other iland product or service names are registered trademarks or trademarks of iland Internet Solutions. All other registered trademarks or trademarks belong to their respective companies. ©2021 iland. All rights reserved.

You might also like