Gogte Institute of Technology: Department of Mechanical Engineering
Gogte Institute of Technology: Department of Mechanical Engineering
Project Report on
EVALUATING THE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF 3D PRINTED
POLYMER COMPOSITES WITH NANO FILLERS
Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the award of the degree of
Bachelor of Engineering
in
Mechanical Engineering
Submitted by
Anand K Mantur 2GI19ME014
Ashok Rathod 2GI19ME024
Ashok S Kumbar 2GI19ME025
Gangadhar Badiger 2GI19ME041
2022 – 2023
KARNATAK LAW SOCIETY'S
GOGTE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
UDYAMBAG, BELAGAVI-590008
(An Autonomous Institution under Visvesvaraya Technological University. Belagavi)
(APPROVED BY AICTE, NEW DELHI)
Department of Mechanical Engineering
CERTIFICATE
Date ofViva-
Name of the Examiners
VOce Signature
1.D V.klan 13)4|23
DECLARATION BY THE STUDENT(S)
I/We, Anand K Mantur, Ashok Rathod, Ashok S Kumbar, Gangadhar Badiger hereby declare
that the project report entitled submitted by me/us to KLS Gogte Institute of Technology,
Belagavi, in partial fulfillment of the Degree of Bachelor of Engineering in Mechanical
Engineering is a record of the project carried out at KLS Gogte Institute of Technology
Belagavi. This report is for the academic purpose.
I/We further declare that the report has not been submitted and will not be submitted, either in
part or full, to any other institution and University for the award of any diploma or degree.
Place: Belagavi
Date: 13/06/2023
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Any achievement does not depend solely on individual efforts but the guidance,
encouragement, and cooperation of intellectuals, elders, and friends. Some personalities, in
their capacities, have helped us in carrying out this project work. We would like to take this
opportunity to thank them all.
First and foremost, we would like to thank Dr. Manjunath G. A , Dr. Shivakumar S our
project guide. We thank him a lot for the guidance and cooperation which he provided
throughout the journey.
We would like to convey our heartfelt thanks to projecting coordinator Dr. A.V. Kulkarni,
Head of the Department Dr. H. B. Kulkarni and Principal for allowing us to work on this
topic.
We thank all the faculty members and Technical/Administrative Staff of the Department of
Mechanical Engineering for constant support and encouragement.
We would also like to thank each and every one of those who have helped us in this endeavour.
Last, but not least, we would like to thank our parents and friends who provided us with
valuable suggestions to improve our project.
CONTENTS
Title page
Certificate
Abstract i
Acknowledgement ii
Declaration iii
Contents iv
List of Figures vi
List of Tables vii
Nomenclature viii
Chapters
1. Introduction 1-3
1.1 Introduction 3
Objective 3
2. Literature Review 4-7
3. Methodology 8
3.1 FDM Process 9
6. Conclusion 33
References 34-35
LIST OF FIGURES
3.2 UTM 12
21
4.1 Tested results obtained using Taguchi Method
NOMENCLATURE
N : Newton
mm : Millimetre
gm : Gram
:
EVALUATING THE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF 3D PRINTED POLYMER
COMPOSITES WITH NANO FILLERS
ABSTRACT
Additive manufactured composite material is widely utilized in the industry sectors due
to ease of manufacturing, cost-effectiveness and little material wastage. Three Dimensional
Printing (3DP) is a technology, which can create geometry into a solid model. Fused Filament
fabrication (FFF) parameters will be altered in terms of varying raster angle. This research
project focuses on the fabrication by FFF and characterization in terms of hardness and
mechanical properties of PLA thermoplastic composites. PLA is a biodegradable polymer with
good strength and biodegradability, which is essential in the production of newer components
via 3D printing. The specimen will be made in accordance with ASTM Standards. The
specimen will be fabricated according to the ASTM Standards.
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
3D printing provides the possibility of low volume and cost effect production as well
as customized parts with extraordinary features such as multilateral fabrication, light weight
hollow material and fabrication of complex structures which are not possible using traditional
fabrication techniques such as CNC milling, casting or molding.
The discovery of graphene in 2004 has triggered enormous research interests around the world
due to its extraordinary mechanical, electronic and thermal properties. The super-strong and
highly conductive graphene holds remarkable potentials in the applications in the new-
generation nanoelectromechanical devices .
Lee et al. [4] measured the elastic properties of graphene experimentally. They found that the
Young’s modulus of graphene is 1.0 ± 0.1 TPa and its breaking strength is approximately
40 N/m.
Experimental works done by Ramanathan et al.and Rafiee et al. also found that graphene
outperforms the graphite and carbon nanotubes in enhancing the Young’s modulus and tensile
strength of nanocomposites. The superiority of graphene stems from its two dimensional
geometry, high surface-to-volume ratio and the associated stronger interface interaction. In
addition to the experimental works, atomistic simulations have also been carried out
extensively to explore the mechanical properties of graphene. By using molecular dynamics
(MD) simulations based on adaptive intermolecular reactive empirical bond order (AIREBO)
potential , the research group led by Aluru et al. investigated the various effects on the
mechanical properties of graphene under uniaxial tension and shear strain. They discovered
that size, chirality, temperature, and strain rate exert significant influences on the fracture
strength of graphene. Pei et al. and Zheng et al. employed MD simulations to investigate the
mechanical properties of the graphene functionalized with hydrogen and other chemical
groups. It is worth noting that most of the atomistic simulations focus on the mechanical
characterization of monolayer graphene . Fewer studies have been done on the bilayer or
multilayer graphene. In the experimental works and practical applications, the majority of the
graphene-based nanocomposites are reinforced by multilayer graphene rather than the
monolayer one. It is found from experiments and atomistic simulations that the thermal
conductivity of graphene is heavily dependent of the layer number. In view of these facts, it is
crucial to understand the relationship between layer number and the mechanical properties.
This is the first aim in the present paper.
It is aware that most of the studies have been conducted at the low temperature or room
temperature so as to avoid the thermal fluctuation. The effect of temperature on mechanical
properties is commonly neglected. In general, graphene-based nano-devices perform their
functions accompanied by the heat generation, causing the rise of the environmental
temperature. It is believed that increasing temperature can affect the performance of graphene
and its composites. Therefore, it is of great significance to investigate the effect of temperature
on the mechanical properties of graphene. This is the second aim of the present work.
Recently, it is experimentally confirmed that different carbon isotopes, such as 13C, can be
introduced in graphene during the production and modify the thermal property of graphene
significantly. The electronic properties of isotope-doped graphene remain unchanged due to
the same number of electrons in carbon isotopes.
However, the combination of carbon fibre and advanced polymers has not yet been achieved.
This is particularly the case of fabrication full-scale components that have improved
mechanical properties and which are electrical conductive. This is where the current research
offers significant improvements in the mechanical and electrical properties of 3D Printable
composites. Previous research shows promising improvements in thermal and electrical
conductivities of graphene-based nanocomposites. PLA-based Graphene composites show the
best performance in terms of tensile and flexural stress with a 1.7 times improvement.
OBJECTIVE
The main objective of this work is to study the Mechanical Properties of 3D printed
bamboo powder reinforced PLA composites.
The sub-objectives are considered to achieve the main objective of the work are as
follows.
To determine the Tensile Strength the Composite Filament using Taguchi method
Chapter 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
3D printing provides the possibility of low volume and cost effect production as well
customized parts with extraordinary features such as multilateral fabrication, light weight
hollow material and fabrication of complex structures which are not possible using traditional
fabrication techniques such as CNC milling, casting or molding.
When carrying out an FEA analysis the properties which are seen in Table 1 are
required to be entered into the software to carry out an accurate analysis.
Table 2.1: Mechanical properties required for input for a successful FEA analysis.
In the Material dialog box of Solid works 2016 Simulation press, the properties are
highlighted to indicate the mandatory and optional properties. A red description indicates the
property is mandatory based on the active study type and the material model. A blue description
indicates an optional property [8]. Mandatory properties include Elastic Modulus, Poisson's
Ratio, Mass Density and Yield Strength. Optional properties are Tensile Strength, Compressive
Strength and Thermal Expansion Coefficient. If a material property is not entered it is entered
as an assumed value.
Material properties will change depending on setting used within the printer.
Determining the effect of process parameters is also an important aspect of this project, as it
will improve knowledge about optimal settings and assist users in the correct selection of
process parameters in real world applications.
1. Jiang et al. explored the tensile strength and the fiber distribution of PLA, ABS, PETG, and
Amphora by adding carbon fiber, with the raster angle of the printing being 0°, 45°, ±45°,
and 90°, respectively. The results showed that PETG had the highest tensile strength after
adding carbon fiber. In particular, when the raster angle was set at 0°, the tensile strength and
the Young’s modulus increased to 48.2% and 313.2%, respectively.
2. Mansour et al. explored the compressive strength, nano-indentation, and modal parameters
of PETG by adding a 20% mixture of carbon fiber, and the results showed that the specimen’s
compressive strain decreased by 66% after adding a mixture of carbon fiber, while the modal
and hardness increased to 30% and 27%, respectively, and the damping and loss factors also
decreased from 17.3% and 15.3% to 13.8% and 12.39%, respectively.
3. Santana et al. explored the differences among the mechanical properties of PLA and PETG,
based on FDM and injection molding technology, and the results showed that PLA has higher
stiffness and tension than PETG; however, PETG has better thermal degradation resistance
and thermal stability than PLA, and, after the FDM process, the tensile strength of PLA and
PETG increases by 24% and 18%, respectively. Because the homoscedasticity of PETG is
lower than that of PLA, PETG should have better printing stability.
4. Rajpurohit et al. explored the effect of the angle and width of the grid and layer height on
PLA, and the results showed that, when the angle of the grid is 0°, it has the highest tensile
strength, and that the tensile strength can be improved by enhancing the width of the grid and
reducing the layer height.
5. Valerga et al. analyzed the effects of the printing temperature, humidity, and the color of the
wire on the mechanical properties, based on PLA, and the results showed that a higher
printing temperature will enhance the deviation of the product size and reduce the tensile
strength, while the deviation will increase substantially when the printing temperature is over
200 °C. As far as the mechanical properties are concerned, the printing temperature should
be set at 220 °C.
6. Vinyas et al. studied composites of PLA, such as PLA +30% nylon glass fibers, PLA +10%
carbon fibers, and a PLA + PET-G polymer blend, after analyzing the tensile strength and
heat-resistance, and the results showed that PLA + 10% carbon fibers had the highest tensile
strength. Meanwhile, PLA +30% glass fibers could provide excellent thermal stability and
can be used where primary importance is given to thermal stability over the mechanical
strength.
7. Singh et al. divided ABS, PLA, and High-Impact Polystyrene (HIPS) into three slices and
changed the order of printing to produce test specimens. They analyzed the tensile strength
by arranging the different materials, and the results showed that the tensile strength of the
specimens increased to 10.78 Mpa by printing in three layers, with the first layer in ABS, the
second layer in PLA, and the last layer in HIPS.
8. Yao explored the effects of different layer thicknesses on the UTS of PLA, including 0.1,
0.2, and 0.3 mm, with a raster angle of 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, and 90°, respectively. The
results showed that the raster angle affected the UTS significantly, and the discrepancy
between the specimens of 0.1 mm–0° and 0.1 mm–90° reached 52.29%. The present paper
shows the effect of printing parameters on the mechanical properties of the materials. The
researchers used different methods, including adjusting the parameters, adding other fibers,
changing the process, and so on, to improve the efficiency, productivity, and mechanical
characteristics of the printing objects.
9. Barrios et al. explored the parameters needed to ensure that a PETG wire had the best Ca
value, based on FDM, including the layer height, nozzle temperature, process speed, the
acceleration of the process speed, and the flow of material. After analyzing them using the
Taguchi method and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) methods, the results showed that the
acceleration of the process speed and the flow of the material had the strongest influence
the quality parameters of PETG.
10. Guessasma et al. explored the effect on the tensile strength of PETG by setting the nozzle
temperature at 210 °C~250 °C, and the results showed that the PETG wire must be printed
at a temperature of over 230 °C; otherwise, the material cannot be pasted onto the platform.
When the nozzle temperature is set at 250 °C, the porosity has a maximum value of 2% and
the average roughness is approximately 100 μm. In addition, the FDM process will reduce
the tensile strength and stiffness of PETG by over 40%, and the elongation will also decrease
drastically. The present paper on PETG shows that it has better heat resistance than PLA,
and, therefore, many producers are expected to use PETG in the future, in order to
compensate for the disadvantages of PLA. Many researchers have explored a large amount
of data on PLA, based on FDM, and if the parameters of PLA and PETG could be cross-
referenced, the printing parameters of PETG could be evaluated by the data history of PLA
in the future.
11. Bakradze et al. present a heuristic procedure for determining the key processing parameters
(PPs) of PA and ABS; the results showed that it is possible to reduce the optimization time
down to several hours, as well as to reduce the amount of consumed feedstock material.
Tensile tests revealed a strong effect of the amorphous and semi-crystalline nature of the
polymer on the results of optimization.
Chapter 3
METHODOLOGY
Literature review
Identification of 3D printing
machine and facilities
Characteristics of Samples
Mechanical Testing
Tensile
Conclusion
To operate an FDM machine, you first load a spool of this thermoplastic filament into
the printer. Once the nozzle hits the desired temperature, the printer feeds the filament through
an extrusion head and nozzle. This extrusion head is attached to a three-axis system that allows
it to move across the X, Y and Z axes. The printer extrudes melted material in thin strands and
deposits them layer by layer along a path determined by the design. Once deposited, the
material cools and solidifies. You can attach fans to the extrusion head to accelerate cooling in
some cases. To fill an area, multiple passes are required, similar to coloring in a shape with a
marker. When the printer finishes a layer, the build platform descends and the machine begins
work on the next layer. In some machine setups, the extrusion head moves up. This process
repeats until the part is finished.
Materials Used
Bamboo (20%) reinforced with PLA (80%)
Bamboo Fiber
The fundamental benefit of natural fibers is the long-term sustainable supply and easily
degraded, so it is safer for the environment than synthetic fibers [22]. Unlike other natural
fibers, bamboo is good for environment, with fast growth and a high rate of carbon dioxide
fixation, making it the most significant plant fiber. Bamboo has many benefits, like
biodegradability, lightweight, high strength, and stiffness. These properties cause bamboo to
be used traditionally to manufacture utensils. Bamboo can also be employed as a reinforcement
if fibers are extracted in a controlled manner.
A suitable procedure for extracting controlled bamboo fibers from bamboo trees must
be developed to reap the benefits of bamboo fibers. However, bamboo fibers with excellent
mechanical qualities are difficult to come by. The bamboo fibers are covered with lignin, so
they are brittle compared to other natural fibers. As a result, a planned technique should be
followed to extract bamboo fibers used as a reinforcement in composite materials. The physical
and mechanical characteristics are listed here in Table 1.
Axes: X, Y, and Z. X and Y are the dimensions in which an individual slice is built, Z is the
vertical dimension.
Extruder: An assembly consisting of a stepper motor, a heating element, and a print nozzle.
The stepper motor draws the filament into a heated core and through a print nozzle. The
heating element brings the filament to a consistent temperature that allows the melted
filament to be applied to the bed and successive layers of the cooled filament.
Filament: The spooled plastic material that is extruded to create the 3D model. There are
many different types of filament, but for our purposes, we will only cover PLA (Polylactide)
which is a biodegradable thermoplastic derived from corn and other plant products.
G-Code: A file with encoded instructions for printing the object. This file tells the machine
where to go in X, Y, and Z, what temperature to maintain for the extruder, feed speeds for
the stepper motors, etc.
Slicing Software: Software that takes a model exported from 3D design software, adds
support structures if needed, and exports the model as a series of instructions for the 3D
printer. It's called "slicing software" because 3D prints are built up in horizontal slices.
Fig 3.4: Twin Screw extruder is used to prepare the composite filament
If the output or degree of fill is not found running at the maximum volumetric rate it can be
impacted by the pressure flow within the extruder. The counter-rotating twin screw extruders are
found forming a closed channel inside the intermeshing region as the output is less vulnerable as
compared to the pressure flow within the extruder. They are considered to be having positive
displacement pumps.
Fig 3.6: Slicing the 3D Model into layers in Slicing Software: Cura Software
Design of Experiment
1 0.16 180 30
2 0.16 200 60
3 0.16 220 90
4 0.2 180 60
5 0.2 200 90
6 0.2 220 30
7 0.24 180 90
8 0.24 200 30
9 0.24 220 60
Taguchi method recommends the use of the loss function, which is further transformed into signal-
to-noise (S/N) ratio in the optimisation process. Higher values of the S/N identify better design
factor settings that make the system more robust and minimize the effects of the noise factors.
Design factors are those able to be controlled while noise factors are impossible or too expensive
to manage. They are sources of system variability. Three categories of performance characteristics,
namely nominal-the-best, larger-the-better, and smaller-the-better, are usually used to analyze the
S/N ratio. In this research, the authors want to minimize the printing speed and weight of printed
products
In the response table, the delta value was calculated by taking the highest average response value
minus the lowest average response value for levels of one factor. The delta values were used to
indicate the level of the factor impact on the response. The smaller order of rank represents the
more significant influence on the output. For example, the factor which has the highest delta value
was assigned as rank 1. In other words, this factor has the most significant influence on the response.
Chapter 4
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TEST RESULTS
Orthogonal Cs Area Peak % Stress Strain UTS
Array Load Elongation
Table 7 shows the experimental results of the work carried out. Each of the 15 experiments
(in Table 2) was conducted two times to account for variations that may occur due to noise factors.
Minitab 18 software was used to calculate the S/N ratio and generates graphs for Taguchi method
In the above fig 5, the specimen breaks exactly at the center in only two specimens i.e. T5L1
and T3L1and in remaining specimens failure occurs instantly and doesn’t give accurate results of
tensile strength. So, T7L2, T1L1, T2L1, T7L1, T8L1, T9L1, and T4L1 specimens were not considered
for the study of mechanical properties as they failure suddenly.
%ELONGATION
STRESS(N/MM²)
21.2875
21.577
21.116
20.4975
19.875
19.738
19.713
18.599
17.167
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 L9
In above fig7, maximum stress occurs for sample L1, L2, L3 and L6 which ranges from
21.577 to 20.4975 and minimum stress includes for samples L4, L5, L7, L8 and L9 ranging from
19.875 to 18.599. So, this shows that samples which are having high stress obtain better tensile
strength than the lower stress samples with optimum level parameters like layer height, printing
speed and printing temperature.
In above fig8, ultimate tensile strength is maximum for sample L1, L2, L3 and L6 which
ranges from 36N/mm2 to 34N/mm2 and minimum stress includes for samples L4, L5, L7, L8 and
L9 ranging from 33N/mm2 to 29N/mm2. So, this shows that samples which are having high stress
obtain better tensile strength than the lower stress samples with optimum level parameters like layer
height, printing speed and printing temperature.
This shows that higher ultimate tensile strength specimen will have more ductility property
& increase in percentage of elongation.
From fig 9, Layer height and printing speed are two factors that have the most significant
impact on the strength of a printed object. Layer height and printing speed have the largest effect
on the value of printing time. The effects of three factors (layer height, printing temperature, and
printing speed) on the value of tensile strength have not much different. However, layer height and
printing speed are two parameters that have more influent than the rest. The maximum layer height
and print speed resulted in the fastest printing time.
Fig 4.6:
Figure indicated the change in length with the load applied for the 3D printed tensile
specimen L1. From the figure we can easily identify the critical points such as upper yield point,
lower yield point, ultimate load and fracture load. The specimen as shown the ductile behaviors
before failure.
Figure indicated the change in length with the load applied for the 3D printed tensile
specimen L2. From the figure we can easily identify the critical points such as upper yield point,
lower yield point, ultimate load and fracture load. The specimen as shown the ductile behaviors
before failure.
Figure indicated the change in length with the load applied for the 3D printed tensile
specimen L3. From the figure we can easily identify the critical points such as upper yield point,
lower yield point, ultimate load and fracture load. The specimen as shown the ductile behaviors
before failure.
Figure indicated the change in length with the load applied for the 3D printed tensile
specimen L4. From the figure we can easily identify the critical points such as upper yield point,
lower yield point, ultimate load and fracture load. The specimen as shown the ductile behaviors
before failure.
Figure indicated the change in length with the load applied for the 3D printed tensile
specimen L5. From the figure we can easily identify the critical points such as upper yield point,
lower yield point, ultimate load and fracture load. The specimen as shown the ductile behaviors
before failure.
Figure indicated the change in length with the load applied for the 3D printed tensile
specimen L6. From the figure we can easily identify the critical points such as upper yield point,
lower yield point, ultimate load and fracture load. The specimen as shown the ductile behaviors
before failure.
Figure indicated the change in length with the load applied for the 3D printed tensile
specimen L7. From the figure we can easy identify the critical points such as upper yield point,
lower yield point, ultimate load and fracture load. The specimen as shown the ductile behaviors
before failure.
Figure indicated the change in length with the load applied for the 3D printed tensile
specimen L8. From the figure we can easy identify the critical points such as upper yield point,
lower yield point, ultimate load and fracture load. The specimen as shown the ductile behaviors
before failure.
Figure indicated the change in length with the load applied for the 3D printed tensile
specimen L9. From the figure we can easy identify the critical points such as upper yield point,
lower yield point, ultimate load and fracture load. The specimen as shown the ductile behaviors
before failure.
CONCLUSION
The present study shows an experimental investigation on mechanical properties of
PLA+Bamboo powder composite polymer in additive manufacturing processes.
Several manufacturing parameters (layer height, printing speed, and printing temperature)
were varied and the results analysed by means of graphical and statistical analysis.
From the present study it is found that the optimum level setting that is layer height of 0.16,
printing temperature of 220 and printing speed of 90mm/s will yield a 3D printed
components with better mechanical strength for a PLA plus Bamboo powder filaments.
A suitable fiber extraction method and pretreatment of fibers can improve the molecular
interaction within the matrix and fiber.
The distribution of fibers in the matrix depends on the optimum amount of fiber loading.
These parameters can increase the mechanical characteristics of the PLA polymer
composite.
REFERENCES
[1] U. A. I. West Conshohocken, Pa, “Standard A. F2792, Standard Terminology for Additive
Manufacturing Technologies.”
[2] W. M. Klein GT, Lu Y, “3D printing and neurosurgery—ready for prime time,” World
Neurosurg. vol. 80, no. (3–4), pp. 233–235.
[3] J. W. Stansbury and M. J. Idacavage, “3D printing with polymers: Challenges among
expanding options and opportunities,” Dent. Mater. vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 54–64, 2016.
[6] Michael Molitch-Hou, “FEA Analysis and Predicting the Performance of 3D Printing,”
engineering.com, 2016.
[10] A. Lanzotti, M. Grasso, G. Staiano, and M. Martorelli, “The impact of process printer,”
parameters on mechanical properties of parts fabricated in PLA with an open-source
3-DRapid Prototype. J., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 604–617, 2015.
[12] Pearce JM., “Building research equipment with free, Open-Source Hardware.,” Sci, vol.
337, no.(6100): p. 1303–4., 2012.
[13] A. Sells, E., Bailard, S., Smith, Z. and Bowyer, “Maximizing, “RepRap: the replicating
rapid prototype: customizability by breeding the means of production In Piller,” F.T.
Tseng, M.M.(Eds), Handb. Res. And, Mass Cust. Pers. Strateg. Concepts, World Sci.
Tokyo, Smith, W.C. Dean, R.W. (2013), vol. Vol. 1, pp. 568–580.
[15] GRANT McARTHUR, “Melbourne surgeons use 3D printer pen filled with stem cells to
draw knee cartilage,” Herald Sun, Melbourne, 2017.
[18] Lei L, Yao Z, Zhou J, Wei B, Fan H (2020) 3D printing of carbon black/polypropylene
composites with excellent microwave absorption performance. Compos Sci Technol
200:108479
[19] Yang H, Ye T, Lin Y, Zhu J, Wang F (2016) Microwave absorbing properties of the
ferrite composites based on graphene. J Alloy Compd 683:567–574
[20] Miguel A, Jesús M, Eustaquio G, Pedro J, José M, Jean P (2019) Additive manufacturing
of PLA-based composites using fused filament fabrication: effect of graphene nanoplatelet
reinforcement on mechanical properties. Dimens Accuracy Texture Polym 11(5):799
[21] Chieng BW, Ibrahim NA, Yunus WMZW, Hussein MZ, Then YY, Loo YYUPM (2014)
Effects of graphene nanoplatelets and reduced graphene oxide on poly(lactic acid) and
plasticized poly(lactic acid): a comparative study. Polymers 6(8):2232–2246
[22] Guo R, Ren Z, Bi H, Xu M, Cai L (2019) Electrical and thermal conductivity of polylactic
acid (PLA)-based biocomposites by incorporation of nano-graphite fabricated with fused
deposition modeling. Polymers 11:549
[24] Zhou J, Wei B, Wang M, Yao Z, Chen P, Zhou C, Li Z (2021) Three dimensional flower
like ZnFe2O4 ferrite loaded graphene: enhancing microwave absorption performance by
constructing microcircuits. J Alloy Compd 889:161734