Photovoltaic Module Test Report
Photovoltaic Module Test Report
Page 1 of 18
Technical Report
Page 2 of 18
Technical Report
Page 3 of 18
Technical Report
Test result: The test results for the present samples are show in clause3
Doc No.:ITC-TTW0902.02E - Rev.7
Any use for advertising purposes must be granted in writing. This technical report may only be quoted in full. This report is the
result of a single examination of the object in question and is not generally applicable evaluation of the quality of other products in
regular production. For further details please see testing and certification regulation, chapter A-3.4.
Page 4 of 18
Technical Report
1.1 Function
The PV modules for electricity generation systems with max. voltage of 1500 V DC
Not applicable
Covered through the applied standard
Covered by the following comment
Covered by attached risk analysis
2 Order
Page 5 of 18
Technical Report
2020-06-03
2020-06-09 to 2020-06-16
N/A
3 Test Results
HA2020TL-354-
JAM72S10-405/MR 205M6M7210000019 61853-1
001X
HA2020TL-354-
JAM72S10-405/MR 205M6M7210000018 61853-1
002X
HA2020TL-354-
JAM72S10-405/MR 205M6M7210000020 61853-1
003X
HA2020TL-354-
Special samples — 61853-2
004X
To determine the relationship between efficiency and irradiance & temperature, PV modules are
tested across a matrix of operating conditions according to the standard IEC 61853-1:2011,
ranging in irradiance from 100 W/m2 to 1100 W/m2 and ranging in temperature from 15 °C to 75
°C.
To determine the temperature coefficients, PV modules are tested according to IEC 60891:2009,
under irradiance 1000W/m2 and ranging in temperature from 25 °C to 55 °C.
Based on the laboratory measurement data, PAN file can be optimized, then match ability be-
tween the resulting efficiencies in PVsyst software and the lab data can be compared.
Page 6 of 18
Technical Report
TABLE 2:
Flash test data for each sample at the real irradiance and temperature conditions in table 2 of the
IEC 61853-1
Sampe1, Serial Number 205M6M7210000019
Page 7 of 18
Technical Report
Page 8 of 18
Technical Report
Table 3:
Temperature Coefficients Measurement Data at the 1000 W.m-2 Irradiance
Plot of measured PMAX, Voc vs. temperature of flash-tests taken at 1000 W/m2 for each sample
Page 9 of 18
Technical Report
Figure 2:
Plot of measured Isc vs. temperature of flash-tests taken at 1000 W/m2 for each sample
Doc No.: ITC-TTW0902.02E - Rev.7
Table 4:
Average Temperature Coefficients Determined by Laboratory Results
Serial Number Alpha (α) ISC [%] Beta (β) VOC [%] Gamma (γ) PMAX [%]
205M6M7210000018 0.049 -0.251 -0.339
— — — —
Report No.:704062000682 www.tuvsud.com
Rev.: 00
Date: 2020-06-19
Page 10 of 18
Technical Report
— — — —
Average — — —
Table 6:
PMAX Determined by Laboratory Results Scaled to Nameplate Power at STC
Doc No.: ITC-TTW0902.02E - Rev.7
Average Pmax [W] Results Acquired over Multiple Irradiances per Temperature
Irradiance Module Temperature
2
[W/m ] 15 °C 25 °C 50 °C 75 °C
100 40.749 38.929 - -
200 82.397 79.007 - -
400 167.616 161.056 147.539 -
600 252.504 243.326 222.286 201.882
800 335.483 324.323 295.693 268.483
1000 418.811 405.000 369.189 335.701
1100 - 444.639 405.822 368.511
Table 7:
Relative Efficiency by Laboratory Results Scaled to Nameplate vs. Irradiance at 25°C
Irradiance [W/m2]
Serial Number
100 200 400 600 800 1000 1100
Average 96.12% 97.54% 99.42% 100.13% 100.10% 100.00% 99.81%
Page 11 of 18
Technical Report
The PAN file contains a number of model parameters organized in different tabs within PVsyst. The
parameters which affect the model results in forward bias (normal operation) are located in the tabs labeled
“Basic Data” and “Model Parameters”. TUV-SUD’s approach to PAN file creation is as following:
1. Enter manufacturer specifications on the “Basic Data” tab;
2. Enter the relative efficiency test results in Table 7under different irradiance at 25°C into “Additional Da-
ta/Low-light data” , and optimized the Rserie; It is mentioned that the relative efficiency is calculated after scale
the average measured PMAX lab data from Table 5 to the manufacturer’s nameplate power. The scaled
data is shown in Table 6 and Table 7.
3. Define the Rsh, Rsh0 and Rexp (on the “Model parameters” tab) for default values;
4. Enter the Pmax, Isc, Voc temperature coefficient in Table 4 into “Model parameters” tab;
Page 12 of 18
Technical Report
Doc No.: ITC-TTW0902.02E - Rev.7
Page 13 of 18
Technical Report
After creating the PAN file, a quality check is implemented in order to compare the PAN file model
consistence with measurements from the laboratory. The laboratory test results scaled are plotted as efficien-
cy vs. irradiance curves for each temperature of the IEC61853-1 test matrix, as shown in Table 8. Similarly,
efficiency vs. irradiance curves are generated using PVsyst and the newly created PAN file, as shown in Table
9. Comparison between the model and the measurements is represented with the following graph and table,
and the RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) of the optimized PAN file is reported, as shown in Table 10 and
Figure 4.
Table 8:
Efficiency Determined by Laboratory Results Scaled to Nameplate Power at STC
Average Pmax [W] Results Acquired over Multiple Irradiances per Temperature
Irradiance Module Temperature
[W/m2] 15 °C 25 °C 50 °C 75 °C
100 20.30% 19.40% - -
200 20.53% 19.68% - -
400 20.88% 20.06% 18.38% -
Doc No.: ITC-TTW0902.02E - Rev.7
Table 9:
Efficiency Generated Using PVsyst and the Newly Created PAN file.
Average Pmax [W] Results Acquired over Multiple Irradiances per Temperature
Irradiance Module Temperature
[W/m2] 15 °C 25 °C 50 °C 75 °C
100 19.98% 19.23% 17.34% 15.40%
200 20.53% 19.81% 17.96% 16.07%
400 20.91% 20.22% 18.42% 16.57%
600 20.99% 20.31% 18.55% 16.73%
800 20.96% 20.29% 18.55% 16.74%
1000 20.87% 20.20% 18.48% 16.69%
1100 20.81% 20.14% 18.43% 16.65%
Table 10:
Comparison Result Between the Optimized PVsyst Model and the Measurements
RMSE NRMSE(Average)
Page 14 of 18
Technical Report
0.0010433 0.005423
Figure 4:
Comparison of PVsyst Model, Using the Optimized PAN file, to the Laboratory Testing Results
Doc No.: ITC-TTW0902.02E - Rev.7
Serial Number / —
Isc_80°/A: 0.854 —
Isc_-80°/A: 0.845 —
Isc_0°/A: 5.234 —
Page 15 of 18
Technical Report
0 — — 5.234 — — — 1.000
10 — — 5.178 — — — 1.005
20 — — 4.970 — — — 1.011
30 — — 4.611 — — — 1.017
40 — — 4.094 — — — 1.021
50 — — 3.420 — — — 1.017
60 — — 2.670 — — — 1.020
65 — — 2.250 — — — 1.017
70 — — 1.803 — — — 1.007
75 — — 1.333 — — — 0.984
80 — — 0.854 — — — 0.940
85 — — 0.355 — — — 0.778
Doc No.: ITC-TTW0902.02E - Rev.7
Fitted curve
(bo)
Page 16 of 18
Technical Report
5 Documentation
Type: 0.35x6 mm
Soldering material: N/A
Fluxing agent: Shenzhen Vital New Material Co., Ltd.
Type: WTO-PV105A
Junction box: Shanghai JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd.
Type: PVJB-JA-004
Cable: Shanghai JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd.
Type: H1Z2Z2-K, 1x4.0mm2
Connector: QC Solar(Suzhou) Corporation.
Type: QC4.10-35,1500VDC, 41,IP68
Bypass diode: Yangzhou Yangjie Electronic Technology.
Type: SB2045DY
Potting material: Huitian
Type: 5299W-S
Adhesive for junction box : Huitian
Type: HT906Z
Additional material: Fixing Tape: UV-1, 3M
Insulation tape: BEC-201, Suzhou First PV Material Co., Ltd.
Page 17 of 18
Technical Report
6 Summary
TÜV SÜD Certification and Testing (China) Co., Ltd, Shanghai branch,
TÜV SÜD Group
Page 18 of 18