General Epistles - Fremont
General Epistles - Fremont
GENERAL EPISTLES
1
THE PLACE OF CHRISTIANITY IN THE ROMAN
EMPIRE
Dr. Merrill Tenney notes that, in the beginning, the persecutions against the
Christians and the preaching of the Gospel not only came from the Jews, but the
Roman Government itself seemed to both tolerate and treat kindly and fairly the
Christians in every place. Herod, who ruled in Palestine and who was seeking to
please the Jews by opposing the Christians, would be the exception. In general,
Rome's policy was tolerance of various religious groups AS LONG AS they did not
act in conflict with the claims and rules of the state.
We find that the apostles themselves both practiced and taught that Christians
were to respect and obey "the king" and all in civil authority. (SEE: Romans 13:1-7;
I Timothy 2:1, 2; Titus 3:1; I Peter 2:13-17). The only exceptions would be when
they disobeyed the Jewish authorities on the basis of OBEYING GOD RATHER
THAN MAN. This would be when the orders of the authorities went against their
Christian consciences (SEE: Acts 4:19, 20; 5:29-32) and they would chose to accept
persecution and imprisonment rather than compromising their obedience to God.
However, toward the beginning of the sixth decade (60-65 A.D.), the attitude of
the Roman government had begun to change. Even in the early 50's, Priscilla and
Aquila and others had been forced to leave Rome and settle in other places, though
later some returned again to Rome (SEE: Romans 16:3-5).
At that time, the strong beliefs of the Christians began to stir the suspicion and
contempt of the Romans. The Christian belief in the coming judgments of God and
the overthrow of existing governments also created misunderstanding and hatred.
In other words, the time came when the Christians seemed to be a threat to the
Roman government and the Romans felt that strong action needed to be taken
against them to stop the spread of Christianity. The severe persecutions under Nero
came as a product of this deep suspicion and growing hatred of Christianity.
This change in attitude by the Roman Government stirred fear and apprehension
in the Christians and necessitated strong reassurance from God that, no matter
what steps civil governments might take against them, they were in the hands of the
Lord. They also needed strong teaching to prepare them for life under such growing
hatred and persecution. As we note in I Peter 2:3-17, their peaceful obedience to the
rule of government over them was not to change, but their faith was to be spiritually
strengthened and their eyes were to be focused on both the trusted value of their
relationship with the Lord and their glorious hope for the future.
THE COMPARISON OF THE GENERAL EPISTLES
WITH PAUL'S EPISTLES
2
1. There are several distinctive features about these General Epistles that
distinguish them from the Pauline Epistles.
A. Whereas most of the epistles written by Paul were written to specific local
churches in various parts of the Roman Empire, these General Epistles, with
the possible exception of II and III John, are written to a more general
audience. Other than knowing whether the addressees were Jews or Gentiles,
we know little about the specific people these General Epistles reached or the
exact areas where they lived.
B. Whereas most of the epistles written by Paul deal with specific situations and
needs/problems of the people to whom he was writing, the General Epistles
deal with the broader questions of the Christian life and the problems
Christians were facing in the societies in which they live.
C. Whereas most of the epistles written by Paul deal with the doctrine of
salvation, its means and its implications, the General Epistles put heavy
emphasis on the PROOFS of salvation and whether or not PROFESSING
Christians truly POSSESS God's salvation.
D. Whereas most of the epistles of Paul were written before the great
persecutions that began in the mid-60's, and were able to deal with life in the
periods of the great expansion of the spread of the Gospel from 30-60 A.D.,
most of the General Epistles were written during and after these great
persecutions began and deal with how to live triumphantly in the midst of
such persecutions.
E. Whereas most of the epistles of Paul were written when the preaching and
following of the Gospel was still pure in its doctrinal content (the Pastoral
Epistles would be the exceptions), most of the General Epistles were written
when heresies and serious departures from the faith had already taken hold
on the minds and hearts of many and had to be seriously dealt with.
2. There are also differences when we compare THE BACKGROUND of Paul with
THE BACKGROUND of those who wrote the General Epistles.
A. Whereas Paul had ties with the Jerusalem Church but was not really from
there or was part of it, the General Epistles were written by men who were
either leaders of the Jerusalem Church or were a vital part of it. Their
teaching reflects this. Paul, in fact, as an apostle to the Gentiles, was
sometimes in conflict with the leadership of the Jerusalem Church (SEE:
Acts, chapters 15 and 21:17-26; Galatians 2) and had to defend himself
against their criticisms and accusations.
3
B. Whereas Paul was not directly personally connected with the Lord and had
not sat under his teaching in His earthly ministry, all of the writers of the
General Epistles either had family relationship with the Lord or were His
disciples during His earthly ministry. Although Paul does emphasize that he
had seen the Lord in the vision he saw on the Road to Damascus (SEE: Acts,
chapter 9) and considers himself just as worthy an apostle as any of those
who had actually been with the Lord in his earthly ministry, his lack of
involvement in His earthly life and ministry does make a difference in the
teaching Paul gives in his epistles.
C. Whereas Paul had been a violent opposer of the Lord and of the preaching of
His Gospel before his conversion, and had to be saved out of that, the writers
of the General Epistles were all supporters and believers in the Lord either
during his earthly ministry or in the beginning days of the Church. It is
acknowledged that James and Jude, the half-brothers of the Lord, may not
have actually been saved until after His resurrection, and had had some
questions about his teaching and ministry before that time (SEE: Mark
3:21-35; John 7:1-5, 7-9), but they had never opposed Him.
INTRODUCTION
THE AUTHOR OF THE EPISTLE OF JAMES
1. The Epistle of James is traditionally ascribed to James, one of the four half-
brothers of the Lord who are named in the Gospels. This James, though
converted very late in the ministry of the Lord (or perhaps early in the life of
the Jerusalem Church after Pentecost), became a leader in the Jerusalem
Church and seems to have been the chairman of the council there that met to
debate important decisions and to decide the future direction of the work (SEE:
Acts 15).
2. Of the four half-brothers of Jesus, named in Matthew 13:55 and Mark 6:3, only
James and Jude became famous and wrote books of the New Testament. We do
not know what happened to the other two brothers and the two sisters.
3. Contrary to the teaching of the Catholic Church, James and his brothers were
born of Mary and Joseph after the birth of the Lord. They are named in the
4
4. It seems clear that James may not actually have been converted until after the
resurrection of the Lord (SEE: John 7:2-8). He may have been converted
during the post-resurrection period and was then one of the 120 believers who
met together in Acts, chapter 1 as they waited for the sending of the Spirit.
5. James seems to have kept a close connection with Jewish customs and
even seemed to defend the belief common among many in the
Jerusalem Church that both Jews and Gentiles were to be under the
Jewish Law. (SEE: Acts 15; Galatians 2:11-21). He seems to have been
among those Jews who felt uneasy about Paul’s beliefs about freedom
from the Law and Paul’s teachings to the Gentiles (SEE: Acts 21:17-26).
Perhaps this attitude in James came from his fear that Paul’s converts
might be tempted to be lax in their Christian lives if they were not
regulated by the Law.
1. In the opening verse of chapter 1, James clearly states that he is writing to the
“twelve tribes who are dispersed abroad.” This could only refer to those Jews
whose ancestors had been taken captive by the invaders and carried to far
lands.
2. Though many of those carried into captivity had chosen to return to Palestine
when permitted, many others chose not to return but desired instead to settle
permanently in the lands where they had been taken.
3. Many of these who were dispersed throughout the areas of Asia and Europe
would return to Jerusalem only for special feasts and then would return to their
places of “dispersion” to resume life there.
4. It seems likely that James is assuming that those to whom he is writing are
Christians. Even though he is writing early in the Church age, there would be
many Jews who had heard the Gospel in returning to Jerusalem for a feast and
then had gone back to their place where they had been dispersed. Many would
be lacking proper teaching in living their Christian lives and would need this
teaching from James. They also would need encouragement in facing trials and
persecutions as Christians.
5
THE MAIN EMPHASIS AND THEME OF THE EPISTLE OF JAMES
4. His teachings are intensely practical as he applies them to the daily situations of
life that believers face, and emphasizes the ways true believers would spiritually
react to those situations.
5. Dr. Merrill Tenney suggests that “The True Standards of (Christian) Living”
might be the simplest way to define the theme of the epistle.
1. In our study of the Book of Acts, we note that James was not only a leader in the
Jerusalem Church, but he also spent most of his life there. Every time the
Jerusalem Church is mentioned, James is presented as active in its ongoing life
and witness.
2. Though others of the leaders of the Jerusalem Church traveled and ministered
throughout Asia, with Peter even going as far as Corinth, it is possible that
James never traveled outside the city of Jerusalem in any major ministry that he
might have had.
3. It is most likely, therefore, that the Epistle of James, written early in the Church
Age, 45 A.D. and written to the Jews of the Dispersion, was written from
Jerusalem itself and that James continued to serve the Lord there and died
there.
THE DATE FOR THE WRITING OF THE EPISTLE OF JAMES
6
1. The nature of the Epistle of James indicates that it was written early in the life
of the Church. This is especially seen in the fact that the Law seems to be the
center of the moral teaching of the Epistle and that the author is very closely
related to teaching concerning the Law.
2. We also note that the emphasis of the Epistle is upon the Jews. This seems to
indicate that the Gospel had not yet widely spread among the Gentiles. Paul’s
first missionary journey, which made an impact on the Gentiles and greatly
changed the direction of the witness of the Gospel, did not begin until 45 A.D.
3. Most Bible scholars believe that this was the earliest of all of the books of the
New Testament, perhaps written as early as 45 A.D.
I. Introduction 1:1
7
E. The use of spiritual wisdom in dealing with riches 5:1-6
I. INTRODUCTION 1:1
A. As noted before, the one writing this epistle is not James the brother of John,
who was killed very early in the church age, but is James the half-brother of the
Lord. He probably was not converted until after the resurrection of the Lord,
but later became one of the main leaders in the Jerusalem Church. As the
leader of this key mainly Jewish Church, his authority would be recognized by
these scattered Jews. Therefore he does not have to identify himself other than
using his name.
C. The addressees are the Jews scattered throughout Asia and other places whose
ancestors were taken to those far places by the invaders. Many of these Jewish
ancestors then chose not to return to resettle in Jerusalem when they were
permitted to do so by later rulers.
D. These would be Christian Jews for there is no indication in the text of the
epistle that any part of this epistle is intended to be evangelistic in nature.
Although they are Jewish Christians, many of them would be tempted to adopt
some of the questionable ways of the Gentiles in their churches (SEE: Romans
14; I Corinthians 8) by turning against all of the strict teachings of their Jewish
backgrounds and practicing daily patterns of life that would bear little
8
resemblance to their Jewish heritage. James writes to correct and guard them
against this temptation.
1. Like the Apostle Paul, these Christian Jews would be cut off and persecuted by
their fellow Jews once they truly believed in Christ and took an open stand for
Him. Those who formerly were their friends and associates would now treat
them as enemies and would even take every opportunity to express their
hatred both of the Lord and of these followers of His.
2. The “trials” he refers to several times would not only be the persecutions they
would face because of their faith and stand for Christ, but could also refer to
the difficulties of living as Christians in the ordinary challenges and
circumstances of life in that non-Christian society in which they lived.
4. They were to completely accept their new stand for the faith and the
circumstances it permitted to come into their lives.
5. There were several specific circumstances that he deals with in this section.
a. He deals with the circumstances of those who are undergoing trials in their
Christian lives and who might be tempted to give up their stand for the Lord.
Rather than giving up, they are to accept the endurance that the Lord brings
into the lives of those who are being so tested. 1:2-4
b. He also deals with those who seem to live in doubt without any real wisdom in
living their Christian lives. They are to depend on God for their wisdom in
living their lives and are to seek that wisdom with faith. We note that he will
return again to the subject of the wisdom we need in living our Christian lives
in the section 3:13 to 5:11. 1:5-8
c. He deals with those who are affected in various ways in matters of material
possessions as they live in this world. Those in both extremes of circumstances,
whether rich or poor, are to depend on God and not to make possessions the
main concern of their lives. The one in very poor circumstances is to rejoice
and the one with very many possessions is to be humbled. 1:9-11
9
d. He returns again to those who live under trials and points to the rewards he
will receive from the Lord for persevering under these trials. This reward will
be an incentive to them to go on for the Lord. 1:12
C. One Who Controls His Actions and Walk Before God 1:19-27
1. The first action he deals with is that of ANGER. He points out that possible
anger in the life of the Christian is to be kept under spiritual control and that
the anger of man does not bring righteousness into the life of the Christian. It
can deny him that righteous life before God. 1:19, 20
2. They are to decide on personal SEPARATION from sin and wickedness (SEE:
I John 2:15-17), and are to humbly receive and live by the Word that is
implanted in their hearts by God. 1:21
3. Not only are they to receive the Word, but they are to be DOERS of the Word
rather than just hearers of it. 1:22-27
b. The man who both knows the Law of Liberty and earnestly follows it in his
Christian life by becoming an “effectual doer” of it, will truly be blest of God
as he lives in this world. 1:25
10
1. In this passage, he is dealing with the very human tendency to favor certain
ones over others, especially when some may be more important to us in life.
2. He begins with the warning that the Lord in whom they have faith is worthy of
a better response to others in their lives than that of favoritism. 2:1
3. He uses the illustration of a very important man coming into their church at
the same time as a very poor man. SEE ALSO: I John 3:17-20, the example of
a brother in need.
a. In the eyes of God they are equally important and loved, and He Himself
shows no favoritism in the way He regards them or treats them. In Romans
1:18-3:18-5:21 and Ephesians 2:11-3:11, there is the emphasis upon the equal
unworthiness of all of mankind before they are saved and their absolute
equality and oneness in the Lord after they are saved.
b. On the human level, it is difficult for us to see others as God sees them, and so
we will always be faced with this temptation to favoritism. In this illustration,
it is easy to see why we also might be tempted to favor a rich and important
person over a person who is poor and who would have little place in society.
4. This example also reminds us of other reasons why we might favor certain ones
over others. In New Testament churches where there was a mixed assembly of
Jews and Gentiles, there would be the temptation to favor Jews over Gentiles.
The same would be true when both masters and slaves were part of the
assembly of believers.
5. Today, we might not have these forms of diversity, but there will always be
some differences between members of today’s assemblies of believers. The
warning of this passage is just as important for us to heed as it was for them.
1. The passage opens with the teaching that FAITH that is not accompanied by
works as the PROOF of that faith is completely empty and without meaning or
validity. He uses the illustration of a person who claims to have faith but does
not reach out to the brother who is hungry (SEE: I John 3:17-20) to show that
there might be doubt whether that person has ever really had faith. 2:14-17
2. He goes on to teach that people have a right to expect us demonstrate our faith
by our works. They also have the right to question our faith when works are
absent. 2:18-20
3. There has been some misunderstanding over the use of Abraham as an example
of faith accompanied by works. This is due to the fact that Abraham not only
had faith, but his life demonstrated the presence of that faith. 2:21-23
11
a. The misunderstanding leads some to conclude that Abraham’s righteousness
and acceptance before God was based on the combination of faith with works
rather than on faith alone.
b. This wrong conclusion is denied in every other place where the faith of
Abraham is taught. Romans, chapter 4 and Hebrews 11:7-17 clearly teach
that Abraham was accepted by God solely on the basis of his faith, and that
the works that he did were a PROOF of that faith rather than the means of
his acceptance by God.
c. Even the offering of his son mentioned in Hebrews 11:17 was a proof of his
faith. Genesis 22:12 shows that this offering of his son PROVED to God that
Abraham really feared God and was submissive to Him in everything rather
than being a means of establishing his relationship with God.
1. The problem of controlling the use of the tongue is a frequent subject in the
Scriptures. SEE: Psalms 34:13; 39:1; 141:3; Proverbs 20:19; Matthew 11, 18-
20; Romans 1:29; I Timothy 5:13 and James 1:26. In these passages, there is
great emphasis upon the guarding of the tongue so that it does not become a
cause for sin, and also avoiding those who misuse the tongue through gossip.
2. This passage in James, chapter 3 is the strongest passage on the subject of the
tongue in the Scriptures, and its dangers in the lives of God’s people.
a. The passage opens with a warning that we are not to aspire to be teachers of
others because the tongue of the teacher is especially examined by God and
comes under His possible judgment. There is the danger that the tongue of the
teacher may utter error and may fail to express things in the ways God wants
them to be expressed. The teacher therefore is most open to danger in the use of
his tongue, and has responsibility to examine and control his tongue. 3:1, 2
b. In the next verses, he points out that the tongue is a small part of our bodies
and is apt to be ignored as a source of danger in our lives and testimonies as
Christians. He compares the tongue with the bits in the mouths of horses, the
rudders on ships and small fires to show that these, though small, can vitally
affect the outcome for the horse, ship and forest. 3:3-5
c. He goes ahead to teach the spiritual difficulty we face in bringing our tongues
12
under control because of their nature and tendency to be used sinfully. 3:6-8
d. He closes this section by showing one way that God’s people wrongly use their
tongues, as they speak in blessing God at the same time they are speaking in evil
ways about men who are made in the image of God. Such use of the tongue is
not acceptable to God and is a sin before Him. 3:9-12
1. Spiritual wisdom comes only from God, and God has the right to expect that
the one who uses it will use it with good behavior. 3:13
2. Ungodly behavior in the one who professes to have spiritual wisdom is not from
God but is sinful and satanic in nature and produces sinful results 3:14-16.
3. He then lists the qualities that give evidence of true spiritual possession and use
of wisdom from God. These qualities are: purity, a peaceable nature,
gentleness, easy to be entreated (reasonable to deal with), full of mercy and
good fruits, without disputes (wrangling) and without hypocrisy. 3:17
4. The sowing of the seed that produces righteousness (the Gospel and further
Scriptural teaching) will be done in peace. 3:18
1. He uses strong language to identify why we have troubles both in our daily
walk and in our relationships with others. 4:1-6
a. The main source of our problem is that what we do is often done for the
satisfying of our own desires rather than for spiritual purposes. This affects
also our prayer life. 4:1-3
2. He then gives the solutions to these two serious spiritual problems that affect
our daily walk and lives before God. 4:6-10
13
c. We are to resist the Devil. SEE: Ephesians 6:10-17. 4:7
d. We are to draw near to God and He will draw near to us. 4:8
1. In teaching against speaking against one another, the context indicates that he
is speaking of JUDGING one another in an evil way rather than just speaking
words against someone else.
2. In Matthew 7:1-5. the Lord had addressed this same subject and was probably
mainly dealing with the judgmental attitudes of the Pharisees who could find
fault in almost anyone, but the principles He teaches about judging can apply
to any relationships.
3. The main word of caution in these verses in James in this matter is that God
Himself is the final judge, and that we are unworthy to judge others Rather
than judging others, we are to concentrate on obedience and walking rightly in
our own lives.
2. He teaches that overall, in this dependent relationship with God, we are to pay
close attention to the way God speaks to us through our consciences and are to
obey the way He deals with us in touching our consciences. SEE: Romans 14:5,
14, 23. 4:17
E. The use of spiritual wisdom in dealing with riches. 5:1-6
a. The riches of those he addresses are not being used for the good of others but
rather they are used for their own selfish purposes and are therefore despised
by God as being worthless and sinful in their use of them. They are corrupted.
14
b. Rather than being happy in possessing them, the rich are to “weep and howl”
because of the judgment that will surely come upon them.
2. These rich men have used their lives, perhaps through the very
gaining of these riches, to oppress others so that they might gain from the
misery and suffering they have inflicted on others.
3. These rich men have also lived sinful and wanton lives and this will lead them
to future destruction at the hands of God.
1. These Christians are not only going through suffering in their own lives, but
they are depending on the SOON coming of the Lord to take them out of all
that they are going through. This has led them to having an impatient and
complaining spirit in waiting on Him.
2. Though the Lord could come at any time, God does not tell when that time will
be, and Christians are to be patient in waiting for this event to take place. It is
possible that it might not happen in any of their lifetimes (or ours, for that
matter), and that does not change the spiritual approach they are to have
concerning that event.
3. Even if their waiting produces more suffering and difficulties in their lives as
they live on this earth, they are still to have the same patience and right
spiritual attitude in their lives.
4. The compassion and mercy of God will be sufficient to take them through, just
as it has been sufficient for those in past ages. SEE: II Corinthians 12:8-10
1. The phrase he uses, “do not swear”, is not referring to vile language that they
might be tempted to use, but rather it has to do with the taking of an oath
before others or before authorities to establish the truth of what we say.
3. We also note the teaching on the subject of honesty in such passages as Psalms
58:3, 101:7, Proverbs 12:22, 19:9, and Colossians 3:9. Being completely honest,
both in word and deed is part of having a character that is recognized for its
absolute INTEGRITY. SEE: Psalms 26:1.
15
H. The use of spiritual wisdom in praying for needs. 5:13-18
1. In this passage, he is first setting forth a certain procedure that the church is to
use iu dealing with sickness. The sick person is to call for the elders of the
church to come and anoint him and to pray over him so that healing may come.
This passage is not teaching that they will perform a miracle on him, but rather
that they will join their hearts together in praying over him. This is a procedure
that many churches still follow today. 5:13-15
V. CONCLUSION 5:19, 20
A. In his conclusion, he deals with the need to be concerned with the spiritual
needs of others. Christians are to be used in turning those who have strayed
into sinful ways back to right relationship and fellowship with the Lord.
D. OVERALL, he has shown what the real PROOFS of salvation are and how
these are to be manifested in their lives. He has challenged them to stop merely
claiming that they are Christians and to start SHOWING the presence of
Christ in their lives by their lives and conduct.
INTRODUCTION
1. Peter as one of the inner circle of the original group of disciples of Christ (Peter,
James and John) (SEE: Mark 5:37; 9:1-13), and one of the main spokesmen
16
and leaders of the Jerusalem Church, would have been a logical choice by God
to write such an epistle and then to follow it with a second and final epistle.
2. We also know that he traveled and ministered widely throughout Asia and even
went as far as Corinth, where Paul had started the work, where he must have
ministered for a time (SEE: I Corinthians, chapters 1 and 3). In the case of
Corinth, he had such influence and was so widely respected that there even grew
up a following after him. Perhaps without any sin or fault on his part, this
following of his helped to completely divide that church.
3. Therefore, as a widely recognized spokesman for the Lord and leader of the
Church, Peter would also have had the authority to both write these inspired
writings and to command obedience to what was written as he addresses those
"scattered throughout........" the various places in Asia.
1. There has been much dispute about the place where his epistle was written. The
dispute centers on the question as to whether Peter ever lived or died in Rome.
b. Merrill C. Tenney, in his book New Testament Survey, believes that Peter did
reach Rome on his journeys and may have died there, BUT that he did not
come to Rome before 60 A.D., as confirmed by both Acts and Romans 15. He
therefore had nothing to do with the founding/co-founding of the Roman
Church or had any ministry there over a period of time either alone or as a
coworker with Paul.
1) While it is possible that the "BABYLON" of I Peter 5:13 does refer to the
Babylon on the Euphrates, since there was a Jewish settlement and later a
Christian settlement there, there is no evidence that Peter ever ministered
there. Tenney believes that the name Peter gives to it was the mystical name
the Christians used to refer to Rome as having all of the evil of the ancient City
of Babylon.
17
Mark in Rome with Pau (61 A.D.) and there is no evidence that Mark ever
went to the ancient Babylon.
3) He also cites patristic (from the church fathers of the first two centuries)
evidence that Peter was in Rome at the end of his life.
c. We also note in Peter's second epistle, written just before he died, that he
warmly refers to Paul and his writings (II Peter 3:14-16). Some feel that this
may indicate that they were in close communication with each other in Rome
at the time of the writing of II Peter.
d. THERE ARE MANY OTHERS, however, who believe that Peter not only had
never been in Rome, but that he also could not have been imprisoned and
killed there.
1) One of the main evidences for this is the fact that Paul himself never
mentioned Peter in any of the five epistles he wrote from Rome during his
imprisonments there. These would include Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians
and Philemon written during his first imprisonment (58-61/62 A.D.), and II
Timothy, written just before he died in 65/66 A.D. If Peter had helped found
the Roman Church, or was in Rome at any time while Paul was there, or even
was in prison awaiting death in Rome while Paul was also there, Paul's failure
to mention him in his writings would not be understandable.
2) In Acts, chapter 28, when Paul arrived in Rome as a prisoner (58 A.D.), there is
no mention at all by Luke of Peter being there or of any contact there between
Peter and Paul. Rather, it seems that Paul, from an apostolic standpoint, is
alone there in the preaching of the Gospel to both Jews and Gentiles.
3) Paul and Peter had never done a joint work together in Asia or Eastern
Europe, though Peter apparently went to Corinth AFTER Paul had labored
there for more than a year and a half (SEE: I Corinthians, chapters 1 and 3).
Paul was also in disagreement with Peter's stand concerning Judaism and the
Law (SEE: Galatians 2:11-21) and had disputed openly with him about it, so it
seems unlikely that Paul would have been willing to do a joint work with him.
4) Paul also had strong convictions about not working where another was
also working (SEE: Romans 15:15-25...especially vs. 20) and it is unlikely
that he would have worked in Rome if Peter was working there also. In
Romans 15, in fact, he seems to indicate that the Roman Christians have
had no apostolic help at all in the city itself and that they needed him to be
there with them.
5) Since Mark was from Asia and went back and forth from there to Rome to see
Paul, and, as many believe, Peter had a close relationship with him in Palestine
and had even supplied many of the facts Mark deals with in the Gospel of
18
Mark, Peter's reference to him in II Peter 5:13 would not necessarily mean that
Peter was with Mark in Rome.
6) If Peter never worked or lived in Rome, the only remaining question would be
concerning the origin of the believers in the City of Rome and in the
surrounding area who greeted Paul when he landed in Italy near Rome as a
prisoner (SEE: Acts 28:13-15).
a) Some of these could have come from the conversions on the Day of Pentecost
when they might have come back to Jerusalem to celebrate the Feast of
Pentecost and heard and responded to the Gospel preached on that day. Acts 2
mentions many different language groups and areas represented among those
who heard the Gospel on that day and responded. Some doubt this possibility
because of the distance involved, and feel that is unlikely that Roman
Christians were also there at Pentecost.
b) These believers might also have come from the work of Priscilla (Prisca) and
Aquila who had originally lived in Rome, had been forced by the government
to leave Rome for Corinth, and then finally had left Asia and had gone back to
Rome to establish a church in their house (SEE: Romans 16:3-5, written in 56
A.D.). The church they established in Rome might well have reached outside
the City of Rome itself to evangelize in nearby towns.
7. If this epistle (and II Peter as well) was not written from Rome, then it is
not clear where the city would be where Peter wrote it.
a) While it could have been written from Palestine itself, it seems more
likely that Peter was in some other city of Asia to the north or
northwest of Palestine. He could even have been in a city of Asia Minor
along the Aegean Sea.
b) The text itself suggests that it was the City of Babylon itself (5:13), but that
reference simply could have been Peter's way of comparing the conditions of
another wicked city in Asia to the total depravity found in that ancient city.
1. The main question would be whether these who are "scattered abroad" are the
Jews of the Dispersion or whether they are Gentiles.
a. It could certainly be said that this description of the addressees could apply to
the Jewish people who were scattered to all parts of Asia and Europe by the
19
invasions and captivities they had faced in past centuries, and who had never
returned to their homeland.
1) While some of the Jews who had been taken captive had returned to the Holy
Land (SEE: The Books of Ezra and Nehemiah) and helped resettle it again, it
seems that most of the scattered Jews found homes in the lands to which they
had been taken and remained there with only occasional trips back to the Holy
Land to celebrate some of the Feasts of the Old Testament.
2) As noted before, the Epistle of James, written by the half-brother of the Lord
who had become a major leader in the Jerusalem Church, is directed toward
these dispersed Jews.
b. However, the nature of these two epistles of Peter is very different in content
and emphasis from the Epistle of James.
1) James is emphasizing the spiritual implications and moral side of the Law of
Moses and bases much of his teaching on the Law in bringing those things to
the remembrance of the readers. The Epistles of Peter hardly refers to the
Law of Moses.
2) The Epistles of Peter, like the Epistles of Paul, emphasize instead the universal
truths of what it means to belong to the Lord and how they are to live in their
relationship with Him. He also emphasizes the trials and tribulations they are
facing and how they are to act and react in the presence of these.
3) It is clear, therefore, that these two epistles are universal in their teaching, and
could include and be of help to both Jews and Gentiles, but their lack of
Jewish-related emphasis indicates that their main purpose is to teach the
scattered Gentiles in all the cities of the Asian area.
c. It is safe to say, therefore, that these epistles are written to the scattered
Gentiles throughout the Asian and Eastern European regions.
1. There are two GENERAL PURPOSES for the writing of this epistle that could
also apply to the writing of II Peter as well.
a. Because these two epistles were written at the beginning of the terrible
persecutions under Nero, and the second one, in particular, was written just
before Peter himself died under that great persecution (66 A.D.), one great
general purpose of these epistles is to prepare them for the great trials and
sufferings they are shortly to go through for the sake of Christ.
20
1). His words of encouragement and instruction in both epistles will help them
understand both the attitudes and the manner of conduct they are to have in
their lives during those terrible times.
b. A second general purpose for these epistles is to deal with the basics of their
Christian lives as Paul had taught in the latter part of many of his epistles.
SEE: Romans, chapters 12-15; Galatians, chapters 5, 6; Ephesians, chapters 4-
6; and Colossians, chapters 3, 4.
1) Many of them would have had little opportunity to be properly discipled after
their conversions, and may at this time even have had no trained leaders to
teach them further in their Christian walk and growth.
a) There would be danger that they would both fail to understand clearly their
responsibilities in their new relationship with the Lord, and also would be
tempted to go astray in their fellowship with Him and their daily following of
His teaching and will for their lives.
b) There is a strong comparison of these two epistles written by Peter with Paul's
Epistle to the Romans where Paul had to deal with the most basic truths of the
Christian life. (SEE: Romans, chapters 6-8 and 12-16). Much of Peter's
teaching closely parallels the teaching of Paul in that epistle.
2) The nature of these two epistles would therefore mainly be to encourage the
scattered believers in their faith and stand for the Lord in the midst of growing
trials and persecutions, and to reassure them of their hope in the Lord.
1. From the nature of the contents of this epistle, it seems clear that it was written
rather late in the life of Peter. It would have been written when Peter had
already labored for many years for the Lord, and now he was inspired by the
Holy Spirit to share some of the lessons he had learned from the Lord and to
give some warnings to the new generations of Christians.
2. It seems likely that it may have been written about the same time as Paul wrote
the Prison Epistles. Peter was not in prison himself at this time and was still in
21
active ministry, but was continually facing opposition to the ministry the Lord
had given him and was predicting that very serious persecutions would break
out in the future.
3. The possible date for the writing of this First Epistle of Peter would be around
60 or 61 A.D., the same dates as the writing by Paul of the Prison Epistles.
I. INTRODUCTION 1:1, 2
I. INTRODUCTION 1:1, 2
22
had a very special relationship with the Lord that distinguished him even from
the other disciples/apostles.
1. Very often Peter was singled out for special attention by the Lord and
shared with the Lord some of his most intimate experiences in ways that
most of the other disciples did not.
a. When the Lord went up on the mountain for the experience of the
TRANSFIGURATION, for instance, only Peter, James and John were
permitted to go up there with him. (SEE: Luke 9:28-35) When they
went into the Garden of Gethsemene for Jesus to pray before his arrest by the
soldiers, the same three were taken with the Lord to share that experience with
Him. SEE: Mark 14:33-42.
2. Peter would also often act as the spokesman for the other disciples when
addressing the Lord. SEE: Matthew 16:13-16; Luke 9:18-21.
B. The question concerning the identity of the addressees of this First Epistle of
Peter has already been dealt with. The main thing to note is that this was
addressed to these Gentile believers in a general way WHEREVER they were.
This letter would be shared perhaps from district to district and might even be
used all over Asia and parts of Eastern Europe. 1b
***WE NOTE that Paul had opened two of his epistles with lists of the
BLESSINGS/BENEFITS the believers had enjoyed in the Lord Jesus Christ.
23
2. In Ephesians 1:3-14, he lists all the blessings believers have been given in
their saving relationship with God through the Lord Jesus Christ. All of
these blessings to true believers have come through Christ, and believers
owe everything, therefore, to Him.
a. This new birth would be the same subject Jesus addresses with Nicodemus in
John 3:1-21. It would be spiritual in nature and would not be the natural
progression of human life and effort that Nicodemus had envisioned. The idea
of Nicodemus would be based on following the Law of Moses so perfectly that
he would be qualified to enter God's heaven with God's approval.
b. Paul had had the same approach to God before he was saved on the road to
Damascus. He speaks of this in Philippians 3:4-6 and 7-10, where, from the
standpoint of a devout Jew and follower of the Law, he had achieved, from a
human standpoint, everything that anyone could achieve by background and
self-effort. However, to be accepted by God he had had to put everything aside
that he had formerly depended on and come to Christ by faith.
5) By the Word of God, and the teachings, the directions and results taught in
the Word of God (vs. 23)
a. The "inheritance" that he speaks of here is not only the forgiveness of sins and
the righteous standing before God (SEE: Romans 5:1, 2) that comes to the
person who has trusted Christ, but it has to do with the eternal life and reward
in heaven that awaits the one who belongs to Christ. (SEE: John 3:14-36)
24
b. It can also refer to membership in the family of God and all the blessings and
benefits that that relationship brings to true believers in Christ as they live in
this world. (SEE: Ephesians 2:11-3:21)
a. This protection we have in our relationship with Christ could refer to the
complete assurance we have of our eternal security in that relationship, and
the fact that nothing can take that salvation away from us. SEE: John 10:28-
30; Ephesians 1:13, 14.
b. Though we believers will all face the Judgment Seat of Christ (I Corinthians
3:10-17; II Corinthians 5:9-11) to be judged for what we have done in the
body, whether it be good or bad, that judgment will never be the judgment
reserved for the lost, for our salvation is not based on any of our works or good
deeds but entirely on the merits of Christ Himself and our faith in Him. SEE:
Ephesians 2:8, 9.
c. The "POWER OF GOD" would most likely refer to the work of the Holy
Spirit on our behalf Who first DRAWS US to the Lord (SEE: John 6:44), Who
then REGENERATES US (SEE: John 3:3-7), Who SEALS US in our salvation
(SEE: Ephesians 1:13) and Who then INDWELLS US (SEE: Romans 8;
Galatians 5:16) to not only give us the continual assurance of our salvation but
who also EMPOWERS us to live lives pleasing and acceptable to the Lord.
a. Vs. 6 teaches that the trials and tribulations they are going through are one of
the means God uses to PROVE/TEST their faith, and that this PROOF is
precious in the sight of God and will bring great honor and glory to Him.
b. This PROOF of their faith also demonstrates and increases their love for Him
and their joy in their relationship with Him even though they have not
physically seen Him or are yet in heaven with Him.
c. If this PROOF is truly found in their lives, they will both honor and glorify
Him in living on this earth, and it will also result in the approval of the Lord as
they live here and then finally face Him (II Corinthians 5:9-11)
25
d. Their final reward in this relationship with Him is the final salvation of
their souls, when they are with Him in heaven forever.
1. This section is important because the Christian Faith and Christianity itself is
built upon solid Old Testament foundations and the work and Divinely inspired
testimony of the prophets of the Old Testament. SEE: Acts 3:22-26.
a. Everything that Christ did and His entire purpose and mission in coming into
the world is taught in great detail by Old Testament Prophecy. Matthew notes
this as he quotes again and again from the Old Testament as verification that
all that Jesus did and taught was predicted long before.
b. It is from the Old Testament that we see clearly the TOTAL mission of the
coming promised MESSIAH. He was first of all to be the SUFFERING
SAVIOR and then was to be the RULING KING. The work of the Suffering
Savior for the sins of the world had to precede His work as the Ruling King.
SEE: Isaiah, chapter 53.
b. The failure of the Jews of that day and even modern Jews to see this DUAL
ROLE of their promised Messiah made it difficult for them to accept Christ
even when He so perfectly fulfilled every prediction and condition made about
Him in the Old Testament. To accept Him as the Suffering Savior, for instance,
would mean that their O.T. sacrificial system was once for all finished and that
this Messiah was GOD'S LAMB offered for the sins of the world. SEE: John
1:29, 36.
c. To even admit that they needed such a sacrifice for sins would be difficult for
them. Even more, trusting Him first as the Suffering Savior would also mean a
delay in His triumphant reign as the Ruling King, leaving them under their
cruel oppressors for an indefinite time.
d. Being under foreign rulers over a past period of many centuries also would
cause the oppressed Jews to desire/emphasize only their need for a powerful
reigning king who would once for all deliver them from these foreign rulers and
26
make the other role of the Messiah to be of little or no importance in their
thinking or expectations.
2. This section emphasizes that the Old Testament prophets did not themselves
see the fulfillment of their prophecies, but that all that they said was in perfect
conformity with the life and work of the Lord in which we (and they by faith)
have partaken and profited.
1. We note that HOLINESS in life is not only a key Old Testament teaching, but
it is also an important theme both in the teaching of the Lord and in most of
the epistles of the New Testament.
a. The entire contents of the Law, as set forth in the Pentateuch, is based upon
God's expectation that those who belong to Him will be disciplined in living
holy and separated lives. We see this repeated again and again in the Book of
Deuteronomy as he reviews and summarizes the entire Law to remind those
who are about to enter the Promised Land of their obligations before God to
please and honor him with their lives.
b. In the teaching ministry of the Lord, he even goes beyond the strict teaching
of the Law of Moses to apply holiness not just to the ACTIONS of their lives,
but also to the THOUGHTS AND INTENTS of their hearts. We see this, for
instance, in both Matthew, chapters 5 and 6 where he goes far beyond what the
strict Jewish leaders had been teaching. We see it again in his condemnation of
the Scribes and Pharisees, the strictest followers of the Law in Judaism, in
Matthew, chapter 23.
c. In the Pauline Epistles, this is also one of the major themes of his writings. We
see it, for instance, in Romans, chapters 6-8, where he emphasizes that the
presence of true salvation in a person's life will also bring holiness and victory
over sin. We see it again in such passages as I Corinthians 6:12-20 where the
body as the Temple of the Holy Spirit, with its responsibility for holiness and
purity, is emphasized. We see it again in I Thessalonians 4:1-8, where he
emphasizes this in terms of "sanctification." Colossians 3:1-4 teaches the same
truth. In almost every other epistle written by Paul, this is also a major theme.
d. In the study of the General Epistles, this is also a major theme throughout
these books. This is especially true in such books as James, I Peter and I John
where holiness and separation from the world is one of the major PROOFS
that a person is really saved. SEE: James 1:13-27; I Peter 1:14-16; I John
2:15-17.
27
e. The Book of Revelations also includes this subject first as it applies to
the seven churches (SEE: chapters 1-3) and then applies it to those who
are to inherit their rewards and escape the final judgment of God.
a. We note in such books as James and I John, that this is shown as one of the
main PROOFS that a person has really been saved. If this is not present, then
there might be some doubt as to whether such a person has ever known the
Lord and His love. SEE: James 2:14-16; I John 2:9-11; 3:14-20.
b. We notice that he introduces vs. 23 with the word "FOR", which ties
together the admonition with the following verses. This word introduces
the subject of the New Birth in Christ. This indicates that this fervent
love for one another is the natural and expected result of being born
again.
d. "From the heart" emphasizes that this love is not be just an outward sign or
superficial in nature, but is to come from the deepest part of ourselves and is to
represent who and what we really are in the depths of our hearts.
e. The unchanging nature of the WORD OF THE LORD not only gives the
assurance of God's instructions and promises through the ages, but it also
indicates that His desires and expectations for us in our walk with Him have
also never changed. Whether it has to do with our relationship with the Lord
Himself, or with His people, or with our separation from sin and the world or
any other matter that affects us in our Christian life and walk, His Word still
speaks just as strongly and finally to us about these things.
28
2) The Prophetical books emphasize that the reason for the judgment and
punishment of God on Israel, resulting in the defeat and captivity of the
people of both of the kingdoms, was due to to this lack of separation from sin
and idolatry and lack of devotion to the Lord Himself.
3) The Lord, throughout His earthly ministry, taught strongly that those who
were oriented toward the world of sin in their personal lives could not be his
followers. SEE: Matthew, chapters 5-7; Luke 9:23-26; 9:57-62; John 15:1-3.
4) Throughout his epistles, the Apostle Paul emphasizes the same truths
concerning holiness and separation from the world. SEE: Romans, chapter 6,
12-15; Galatians, chapters 5, 6; Ephesians, chapters 4-6; Colossians, chapters
3, 4; I Thessalonians 4, 5; I Timothy, II Timothy and Titus
5) Hebrews also emphasizes this truth. (SEE: Hebrews, chapters 12, 13)
c. In answer to the worldliness that these sins bring, he shows them that those
sins are to be replaced by a sincere love for the Word of God and growth in the
Christian life. In other words, their focus is to change from the sins of the
world to a sincere spiritual seeking after the Lord and spiritual walk that is
pleasing and acceptable to Him.
a. They belong to the one who is the SPIRITUAL STONE/ROCK, and one Who
is the only true and perfect refuge for their souls and their lives as they live in
this world and prepare for eternity. 2:4-7a
29
Him would indicate that they do not love Him and appreciate all that He is to
them as their spiritual STONE/ROCK.
3) As we compare this passage with Romans 12:1, 2, we note that the plea of
those two verses in Romans is based on THE MERCY OF GOD. In that
passage in Romans, chapter 12, he is saying: If all that God has done for you in
Christ, in saving you and providing for your life ahead, means anything at all
to you, you are to give Him all of your life and all that you can do in life.
c. They have not only found a sound refuge in the LIVING STONE/ROCK, but
they also have a unique/special standing before God as the "chosen race, a
royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for God's own possession." 2:9, 10
1) Some would teach that such terminology could only apply to the Jewish people
and that this is proof that this epistle is addressed only to the Jews and not to
the Gentiles. They would deny that such terminology could ever, in any sense,
apply to Gentiles.
a) However, the purpose and emphasis of this passage as a whole is not simply
to bring them back to the Old Testament designations of the Jews as fitting
such a description as a NATION, but rather its purpose is to apply such terms
SPIRITUALLY to ALL of those who have relationship with God through
Christ.
b) Without taking away from the standing/place the Jews still occupy in the
present and future plan of God (SEE: Romans, chapters 9-11), this is simply
emphasizing how important the relationship is that ALL believers have with
God in Christ, and the unique position of those who belong to Him. It speaks
of His pouring out of FAVOR AND BLESSING on believers. (SEE: Ephesians
1:3-14). They can be pleased to have such SPIRITUAL standing with God and
such a unique relationship that distinguishes them from the unsaved.
2) I Peter 2:10 seems to confirm this interpretation of the use of these terms as
applying to all believers, both Jews and Gentiles, as it repeats the truth of
what Paul had stated in Ephesians 2:11, 12, when he pointed out that the
Gentiles had been outsiders/seemingly excluded/without hope and without God
in the world in Old Testament times. In I Peter 2:10 he is pointing out the same
truth about the Gentiles. The terms he uses in v. 10 would not apply to the
Jews.
30
d. He closes this section with an appeal to them to separate themselves from the
lusts of the flesh and to maintain a strong spiritual testimony "AMONG THE
GENTILES." 2:11, 12
1) The phrase "AMONG THE GENTILES" seems to some to again prove that
this book was written to Jews rather than Gentiles. This interpretation would
divide these people from the Gentiles on RACIAL rather than on purely
SPIRITUAL grounds.
b) In the latter case, the term "GENTILE" would simply refer to the unsaved
world and people around them and this term would distinguish this
atmosphere and people from the Christians of any/every background to whom
he is writing this epistle.
2) Since the main emphasis of chapters one and two has been SPIRITUAL in
nature, it seems likely that he is approaching the believers on a SPIRITUAL
rather than a RACIAL basis, and that the latter interpretation is more correct.
They are to live such exemplary spiritual lives in this wicked Gentile world and
atmosphere that the unsaved people, among whom they live, may be vitally
affected and perhaps even come to the Lord as a result. Whether or not the
“Gentiles” would respond, they still were to live such lives so that they could not
be blamed either by God or man.
a. This passage very closely parallels the teachings of Paul in Romans 13:1-7
where Christians, living under cruel and oppressive government authority,
were still commanded to "OBEY THE KING." In that passage, Paul is led to
point out that kings and rulers are appointed by God (to keep order in society
and to prevent lawlessness in its citizens) and that those who break civil laws
would be working against God Himself. 2:13, 14
b. As has been previously pointed out, the only exception to such rules would be
when the command of the king/ruler in society would go against the conscience
of the Christian and would be against God's will and Word. This was the case
when Daniel and his companions had to refuse to obey the Babylonian
authorities in the O.T., and Peter and John had to refuse to obey the Jewish
31
ruling authorities in the N.T. SEE: Daniel 3:1-15, 16-18; 6:1-23; Acts 4:19, 20;
5:29. They did not rebelliously resist the authority with force, but instead
submitted themselves to suffer the consequences as they obeyed God, their
higher authority.
d. He closes this passage with the admonition that their submission to authority
would also apply to such submission in spiritual realms as well. This suggests
submission to those in authority in the local church itself. (SEE: Hebrews 13:17)
2:16, 17
b. Many of the slave owners would not have been Christians, and so such
instruction would have been especially difficult for slaves to accept. In the case
of Philemon, who was a Christian, Paul is able to exhort him to give Onesimus
the treatment that God would expect a Christian to give. (SEE: Philemon, vs.
8-19)
c. In I Peter, Peter seems to be dealing with slaves who are laboring under
unsaved masters in the harshest possible conditions. Still, there is to be no
compromise or excuses used for not acting as true Christians even in these
harsh circumstances. In modern times, the principles involved in this
instruction could apply to employers who are unjust and unfair in their
treatment of workers. 2:18-20
32
and EXAMPLE of the Lord has special significance for us.
2:21-25
2) In Ephesians and Colossians, he is dealing with spouses who are saved and are
to have the right attitudes and conduct toward each other. The emphasis in
these two passages is living in the right roles in the marriage relationship, with
the wife in a sweetly submissive relationship with her husband, and the special
responsibility of the husband to be the tender and sacrificial leader in the
home that the Lord requires. As a submissive wife, she is also to give him deep
respect and honor.
b. In this passage in I Peter 3, vs. 1-6, Peter deals with the conduct and testimony
of a wife who is either married to an unsaved man OR to a disobedient and not
very spiritual man. The teaching on her conduct in such a situation is very strict
as her quiet and humble spirit in the Lord is emphasized. The teaching of these
verses is that such a spirit and Godly manner of walk will be God's means of
dealing with her husband's spiritual needs and bringing him into right
relationship with the Lord.
c. Then, in vs. 7, he deals with the attitude of the husband toward his wife and the
way he is to regard and treat her. We note that, whereas Ephesians 5:33 had
emphasized the respect and honor the wife was to show to her husband, this
verse emphasizes the tender care of his wife and the high honor and respect the
husband is to give to the wife. It is interesting to note in this verse that the
quality (or lack of it) of this treatment and honor and respect for his wife will
either be a help or a hindrance in his prayer life.
a. This passage is dealing with the attitudes, conduct and testimony we are to
have with all others, whether they are Christians or not. As we walk in this
33
world, we will have many meetings with people and all of these contacts with
others are to be honoring to the Lord as our lives are molded and shaped and
controlled by His Spirit.
b. The qualities that God desires us to manifest in our lives emphasize a humble,
dedicated and unselfish walk in this world, so that we are not striving with
others or seeking to exalt ourselves. We are also to be centered on the needs of
others and how these needs can be met with our help.
d. He also reminds us that it is God who sets the standards for our walk and
conduct in this world, and He is the one who is also continually testing and
examining us. Right conduct and His approval of our lives brings blessing to us
and we are more than compensated by Him for all that we endure for His sake
in our relationships with others.
e. In vs. 13, he closes with the reminder that righteous and spiritually
controlled behavior will also be protection for us.
1. We note that one of the last things the Lord Jesus Christ spoke of before He was
crucified was that they should expect to go through persecution and trials in
their lives and work for Him. (SEE: John 15:18-25). He taught that the message
they would preach would not be welcome and that the people of the world
would hate them and seek to cause them trouble in order to hinder and stop
them in their work.
2. We also note that the Book of Acts is full of references to the trials and
tribulations that the followers of the Lord went through as they carried the
Gospel farther and farther into the parts of the Roman Empire. (SEE: Acts,
chapters 3-8; 13-21) These trials began immediately after the Day of Pentecost
as Peter and John carried the Gospel to the entire city of Jerusalem and its
surroundings. We read of the martyrdom of Stephen, the scattering of the
believers under persecution, the killing of James and the multiple times Paul
was beaten and opposed as he sought to reach other areas (SEE: II Corinthians
4:7-12; 11:22-33).
3. In II Corinthians 4:8-11 and 11:23-33, Paul tells of all the sufferings he had
gone through for the sake of Christ. He uses this to show that he is completely
dedicated and unselfish in his service for Christ and is willing to give up himself
for the sake of the Lord. In presenting these facts, he is answering his
Corinthian critics, who had questioned his standing as an apostle, his
motivations for serving the Lord and even his personal integrity.
34
4. As we come now to the text of I Peter 3:14 to 4:19, we note several
important spiritual truths that are emphasized:
a. True suffering should come only when a person is truly righteous and spiritual
rather than for some fault or evil in their lives. If a person suffers as a result of
sin or some fault in him, that suffering does not merit the approval of God and
is not worthy to be counted in that person's life. Suffering for righteousness
sake is also the only way such suffering will win the respect and attention of
the unsaved and the approval of God. Therefore, there is to be spiritual
preparation for the suffering that comes as the Lord has His proper place in
our lives and our commitment to Him is renewed. 3:14-17
c. The spiritual preparation for suffering includes separation from sin and
purity of life, with the sufferers being completely committed to the will of
God. He reminds them that they are no longer a part of the sinful "Gentile"
world and that the people in that realm will not understand their stand for
holiness and willing endurance of their sufferings. Those in that "Gentile"
realm, who have lived their lives in sin, will be judged by God. 4:1-6
d. He also deals with how they are to live their lives as they prepare for the
suffering to come. 4:7-11
1) They are to be completely spiritual in their daily walk, are to have right
relationships with others and are to use the Gifts of the Spirit given to each of
them to the fullest extent in their relationship with others and in the work of
God.
2) We note that this is the fourth major time that the Gifts of the Spirit are
spoken of in the New Testament. We found this subject also discussed in
Romans 12:3-8; I Corinthians, chapters 12-14 and Ephesians 4:1-16. The
Lord had only briefly mentioned Tongues in Mark 16:17. In each of these
major passages, the subject is approached according to the need of the
people. The section in I Corinthians is the longest section dealing with this
subject and was mainly given by God to correct wrong and selfish practices
in the Corinthian Church.
35
e. He closes this section by dealing with the attitude they are to have concerning
the coming suffering. Either they will have a negative attitude that comes
from resentment and perhaps even blaming God for what is happening, or
they will have an attitude of rejoicing for the privilege they have of sharing
the sufferings of Christ. 4:12-19
a. This is one of several passages in the New Testament that deal specifically with
this office in the Church. SEE: Galatians 6:6; I Timothy 3:1-7; II Timothy
2:24-26; Titus 1:5-9; Hebrews 13:17.
b. We note that the emphasis in these related passages is FIRST of all on the
spiritual qualifications and spiritual responsibilities of those who occupy this
office. THEN, the emphasis is upon the conduct of the elders/pastors and the
kind of example and influence they are to others. FINALLY, these passages
also emphasize the respect that is due the elders/pastors, and the importance
of submission to their leadership in the local church. While the believers are to
treat them spiritually, the responsibilities of these leaders are also great.
1) They are to be strong and effective leaders but are not to be dictators.
2) They are also not to have a greedy spirit in their work, but are to do their
work willingly and joyfully (and sacrificially, if need be).
3) Overall, they are to be strong spiritual examples to the members of the flock
over which they exercise leadership.
4) There is reward for them, but they will have earned it only if they have truly
been the spiritual leaders and examples that God requires them to be.
36
a.. It is not clear why these are singled out for attention. It may be that these are
some of the future leaders of the churches and they are being prepared by
God and tested concerning their spiritual walk, submission to authority and
overall qualifications for the work of a future pastor/elder.
b. The main stipulation here is that of willing subjection to the leaders of the
church with a spirit of humility both to the leadership and to others in the
church. If they are indeed to be future leaders, then this spirit of humility is to
characterize them now and carry over into their future leadership
a. The first effect of salvation on them will be to humble them under the mighty
hand of God. This speaks of complete submission to Him and His will for their
lives without thought of personal glory or personal gain. In His time, they,
having been tested, will be exalted. This humbling also involves completely
trusting Him with their lives with the knowledge that He deeply cares for them
and will use their lives for Himself. 5:6, 7
b. They are also to join in the warfare with the Devil who is a powerful adversary.
Paul has also dealt with this battle with Satan, and taught that there is the
ARMOR OF GOD that is to be put on in the waging of this warfare (SEE:
Ephesians 6:10-18). As Peter deals with this subject, he is urging them to be
firm in their faith in the midst of suffering so that the Devil will not gain any
advantage over them. 5:8, 9
c. After their have suffered for their faith, they have the assurance that God
Himself will use this to mold and shape them so that they end their days
victoriously as they go into His presence. All the glory will also return to Him
for all they have done and endured for Him. 5:10, 11
A. It is this section that has led some to believe that Peter was in Rome at the time
of the writing of this epistle. This subject was dealt with the in the introduction
to the study of I Peter, and possible answers to the questions raised were given
to show that it seems likely that Peter had never been in Rome. The two items in
this conclusion that some feel prove that Peter was in Rome are:
1. He mentions BABYLON and some who were there sending greetings to them.
They interpret his mention of Babylon as referring to the City of Rome itself
rather than to another wicked city from which Peter might have written. They
feel that it cannot have been the literal Babylon and could only refer to the
capital of the Roman Empire. As pointed out before, this is purely a matter of
speculation, for the text itself does not say this.
37
2. Peter also refers to MARK, the cousin of Barnabas, who is known to have
visited Paul in prison in Rome in 61 A.D. during his first imprisonment. (SEE:
Colossians 4:10, 11). They assume that this means that Mark was also seeing
Peter at the same time in Rome, though nothing Paul says would indicate this.
C. He also states that the teaching in this book represents "THE TRUE GRACE
OF GOD" and exhorts them to stand firm in it. This would mean that the
teaching on GRACE is not just important for salvation. Rather, everything
about GRACE is important to them.....His saving grace, His sustaining grace,
His calling/leading grace and His grace in giving gifts to His people.
D. He closes this book with his desire that all of them will have peace. This is not
peace WITH God (SEE: Romans 5:1), but the peace OF God in their hearts
(SEE: Philippians 4:6, 7, and the introductions to most of Paul's epistles) in
their daily lives. It is true that many Christians, though they are saved and have
no fear of eternal punishment and separation from God, seldom have real peace
in their hearts in their daily lives. They live in a constant state of worry and
fear. However, it is God’s desire for all Christians that this PEACE might be in
their hearts and He has provided for the provision of that by the Holy Spirit.
1. Some of the early church fathers doubted that Peter wrote this epistle, though
they accepted its teaching as important to the life and practice of the churches.
We note that some of the same ones also doubted that II and III John were
written by John the Apostle, but believed that these two epistles also contained
important teaching. These doubts may simply mean that these epistles were not
as widely distributed in that period of time as some of the others, and
the lateness of their being widely available led to these doubts.
38
Peter.
b. He alludes to his approaching death (1:13) which had been predicted by the
Lord Himself. SEE: John 21:18, 19
c. He cites his witnessing of the Transfiguration of the Lord and the effect it had
on his life. 1:16-18 SEE: Luke 9:28-36
f. Overall, there is nothing in this epistle about which Peter would not have been
concerned and been led to expound on. As a leader of the church, his own
writing of this epistle would lend authority to its teachings.
1. The addressees of this epistle could well have been the same Gentile Christians
he had addressed in his first epistle. The main difference would have been that
they would not just have been Gentiles in every place who then were undergoing
difficulties in taking their stand for the faith before outsiders, but the readers in
this epistle were those who were being tempted to false teaching from WITHIN
their own fellowships of believers.
2. The strong admonitions to these believers would be similar to those given in I, II,
III John and Jude, where they are not to be detracted from the Truth they have
received even when the false teachers are those who seek to be their leaders.
1. The peril confronting the churches at that time (65-67 A.D.) was that of doubtful
stands for the faith and serious error arising from the false teachings of those
who professed to be leaders in the work of God. 2:1
a. The nature of this false teaching seemed to have mainly involved a denial of the
redemption and Lordship of Christ. This led them to an abandonment of all
moral standards and a bold assertion of their own rights in their spiritual
ignorance.
39
out after the coming of the Spirit and the spread of the Gospel through Peter,
Paul and others.
2. These dangers would then increase after the death of Peter and would be a
major problem to be dealt with in the epistles written close to the end of the
century and in the centuries that followed.
3. Dr. Tenney therefore points out that II Peter was designed as a stimulus to loyal
and unwavering faith in the Truth they had been taught, and as a challenge for
them to take a stand against all who would seek to introduce error and would
seek to change that Truth. Peter is pointing out that when false teaching comes
from within the body of believers, it has to be dealt with from within by believers
who take a stand and refuse to compromise the Truth.
1. There are several indications in the epistle itself that point to a possible date for
Peter to write.
a. Peter shows that he has knowledge of some of the epistles that Paul had written
(SEE: 3:14-16) Though he had been in Corinth and was undoubtedly familiar
with the writings of Paul to the Corinthian Church, he seems to speak of Paul
and his writings with knowledge of other epistles written by Paul as well.
b. Peter also believes that the time of his death is very near and that he is prepared
for it (SEE: 1:13-15). He had not expressed this in his first epistle when he was
free to come and go as he pleased and was still in active ministry. Now, he seems
to be a prisoner and realizes that the prediction of the Lord concerning his
death is about to come true (SEE: John 21:18, 19). As Paul was a prisoner very
near death in Rome in II Timothy (SEE: II Timothy 4:6-8), and wrote II
Timothy just before he died, so Peter is bringing his ministry to a close and
preparing for death somewhere in Asia or eastern Europe and is writing this
closing epistle.
40
STANDING FAST IN THE TRUE KNOWLEDGE OF GOD
I. INTRODUCTION 1:1
I. INTRODUCTION 1:1
41
death and appearance before the Lord that caused him to adopt this humbler
approach.
1. We compare this list of things that God has given us in Christ with Ephesians
1:3-14, where we find a long list of the BLESSINGS we have in Christ. In that
passage, all that we have in the way of spiritual attainments and results has
come through the Person and Work of the Lord.
a. It is the source of sustaining grace and peace in our hearts when our hearts are
centered in God and the Lord Jesus Christ. There can be no True Knowledge
if the Father and Son are not the heart of that knowledge. 1:2
b. It is also the source of His Divine power being present in our lives, as this
knowledge is the center of our faith and attention in daily living. 1:3
c. This knowledge has also given us a full understanding and experiencing of His
precious promises concerning our lives and our relationship with Him. 1:4
d. It has also brought us into relationship with Him, and has enabled us to escape
from the corruption of the world that comes by lust. 1:4
1. He begins this passage in a way similar to how Paul had begun the plea of
Romans 12:1, 2. The approach in each case is: if these things have been
experienced by you and mean anything at all to you, you will take the actions
that He desires from your lives and will be all that God wants you to be.
a. In the case of Paul, he has based this plea on the MERCY OF GOD. MERCY
had been the subject of the entire section from Romans 1:18 to 11:36 as Paul
has taught that in themselves they were entirely unworthy before God and
42
hopelessly lost in sin, but that, through the Mercy of God, they now stand in
Christ and have everything that He offers through Him.
b. In Peter’s case, this plea is based on all that God has given us in Christ, and is
similar to Paul’s approach in Ephesians 1:3-23 where Paul first lists all of the
BLESSINGS we have in Christ Jesus and then follows this with a prayer that
they might respond to these blessings with spiritual desires and growth.
2. Paul also had emphasized certain ways that their relationship with Christ
would manifest itself in producing spiritual qualities in their lives. We see this
in such passages as Ephesians 4:32-5:2; Philippians 1:9-11; Colossians 1:9-12;
3:12-16; and I Timothy 6:11.
3. Peter now teaches the QUALITIES that are to be added to their faith. Without
building upon the foundation of their faith, none of these qualities can be
manifested.
e. GODLINESS. This is the teaching that we are to manifest not only the
presence of the Lord in our lives (SEE: II Corinthians 5:14, 15; Philippians
1:20, 21) but are also to manifest in our lives His holiness and character and
evidence that we have a relationship with Him and are His followers.
43
This is the genuine heart feeling we have for others that manifests itself in the
way we regard them and the way we treat them.
C. True Knowledge Will Bring these Spiritual Qualities God Wants. 1:10-12
2. In these verses, he is also emphasizing the diligence with which they are to seek
and follow the True Knowledge that God makes plain to them. The purpose for
this diligence is to make sure that what they believe and follow is really going to
produce the eternal results that they are seeking.
3. In chapter 2, he will begin to speak of the false teachers that are appearing, but
the proper approach to the True Knowledge of God by these believers will keep
them safe from these and guarantee their eternal destiny and happiness.
4. In writing these warnings to them, he is not doubting their faith but he wants to
be sure exactly where they stand in the Truth and that they are holding fast to
the Truth that they have believed.
D. Peter’s Legacy and Its Warnings That Peter Will Leave Behind. 1:13-15
1. As he writes this epistle, Peter is indicating that his death is imminent and that
his writings to them and the testimony of his own life are like the legacy that he
is leaving behind for them.
2. It is not only urgent that he share his instructions and warnings with them at
this time, but he reminds them that after his death they will be able to read and
study what he has written as a constant reminder to them of all that he shared
with them.
E. The Divine Source and Authority of the Truth Peter Shares. 1:16-21
1. This passage is one of several dealing with the DIVINE INSPIRATION of the
Scriptures. The other main passage dealing with this is II Timothy 3:14-17,
where Paul teaches the same important truth about the source of the
Scriptures. It is interesting to note that these two men are not distinguishing
between what they themselves are writing and the rest of the Scriptures.
44
2. Peter goes ahead to teach that the Prophets and writers of the Old Testament
were also Divinely inspired by God to speak and write down what they shared.
None of those men of the Old Testament were writing their own ideas or
opinions, but were guided and guarded by the Holy Spirit in everything so that
what they wrote is absolutely authoritative and the Truth of God.
3. We therefore know that this Divine inspiration came through the work of the
Holy Spirit who taught them exactly what they should record so that it
perfectly expressed what God wanted them to say with no possibility of
mistakes or errors. This would be equally true throughout the Bible.
4. As noted above, both of the men, Peter and Paul, who write about this, assume
that the people to whom they are writing know that their own writings are just
as much inspired by God by the Holy Spirit and are just as much to be taken as
the Word of God by those who read and study their writings.
5. As we study the Word of God today, we can clearly see the absolute unity of the
entire Bible, with every part fitting together perfectly and with no possible
contradictions at all between one part and another. Each book and section of
the Bible has its own purpose and perfectly fits into the whole. There is no part
that could be left out or is less important than any other part.
6. As we study His Word, there are no new revelations from God to add to it
(SEE: Revelation 22:18,19), so there is no further INSPIRATION of men by
the Holy Spirit to write new things. Rather, the Holy Spirit, indwelling our
hearts, now ILLUMINATES our hearts to help us understand God’s Word.
III. THE ATTACKS ON THE TRUE KNOWLEDGE
OF GOD 2:1-22
1. From the early days of the spread of the Gospel, we see that there had been
false teachers within the churches. We see this in Acts 11:1-3; 15:1-29 and
21:17-26 (32-56 A.D.) where some were seeking to force Gentiles under the
Law. We see this in Galatians, chapters 1-4 (48 A.D.), where Judaizers had
come into the churches telling them that they had to include the Law in their
faith. We see this again in I Corinthians 15:12 (54 A.D.) where some had been
denying the future resurrection of the dead.
2. Beginning in the early 60’s and continuing down to the end of the century
when John wrote his final epistle, Revelation, there had been a bold and
arrogant rise of false teachers in the Church, attacking every major doctrine
that was important to the faith they held. These were not just teachers on the
outside seeking to lure the followers of the Lord from their devotion to the
Truth, but were some of their own number posing as believers. As members of
45
some of these assemblies of believers, it is possible that some of the believers
themselves might even admire them because of their clever teachings and ways.
4. These many warnings indicate that these false teachers were everywhere, and
perhaps were growing in number, and so were a cause of major concern to
leaders like Paul, Peter, John and others. If the believers in the churches did not
take a firm stand against them, they could destroy the faith of the believers and
the pure stand for the faith of the churches.
5. In this second chapter of II Peter, Peter devotes the chapter both to warnings
concerning the teachings and nature of these false teachers, and also to the
methods they will use to deceive the believers.
a. He first states the danger that is ahead of these believers in the entrance of
these false teachers AMONG THEM, and what the intentions and actions of
these false teachers will be. In this verse, he also emphasizes that their false
teachings are not simple matters, for they go all the way in denying the Truth,
even to the extent of questioning the Truth concerning the Lord. Vs. 1
b. He then speaks of the reality that many will follow their teachings among the
weaker brethren of the churches. No matter how they are warned, there will
always be some who are attracted to false teachings when they arise. In II
Timothy 4:3, these people are described as those with “itching ears,” who are
not satisfied with simply following the Truth and shutting out everything that
is contrary to that Truth, but have an interest in listening to every kind of
teaching that comes along. Vs. 2
c. Their method of these false teachers will be to cleverly and convincingly use
false words to teach and exploit the believers. Vs. 3
d. He then speaks of how God had had to deal with false teachers in the Old
Testament through His judgments,and how He protected His people. Vs. 4-8
e. He asserts the absolute ability of God both to protect His people from such
temptations and also to deal with those who seek to lead them astray. Vs. 9, 10
46
g. These people are completely without excuse. SEE: Romans 1:20. They have
had complete access to the full knowledge of the Truth of God, but have
deliberately and willingly turned from it to their false teaching, and have
dedicated their lives both to following these false teachings themselves and also
to leading others astray. SEE: Romans 1:32. God’s judgment on them will be
especially severe. COMPARE WITH: Hebrews 6:4-8: 10:26-35. Vs. 20-22
6. We can see how these teachings and warnings about false teachers apply today
to the false teachings of the Mormons, Jehovah’s Witnessess and others who
have full access to the Truth of God taught in the Word of God, but who have
deliberately turned aside from the Truth into their false teaching. Their actions
in following their teachings and leading others astray in it also mirrors the
actions of the false teachers in the time of Paul, Peter and others.
1. We are to be patient as we know that He will bring to pass in His will all that
has been promised in spite of what the mockers may say in their doubts. In His
good time, the Day of the Lord will surely come to pass. 3:8
2. God’s purposes, in delaying His coming, will only be fulfilled when, in His
mercy and grace, He has brought the Gospel to everyone He desires to reach
and they have come to repentance and salvation. 3:9
C. The DAY OF THE LORD will bring with it judgment by God and destruction
as well as the fulfillment of His promises. 3:10
D. As we wait for that day to come, we are to guard ourselves so that we are
everything in our lives and conduct that God wants us to be. 3:11
E. He reminds them that the DAY OF THE LORD will not only bring judgment
and destruction of the old, but will also bring the new heavens and new earth
which we are to inhabit as His people. 3:12, 13
F. In the light of this truth, as we look for His coming and its purposes and results,
47
we are to live in in this world in holiness and blamelessness as we wait for this
important event to take place, and are to regard the patience and timing of the
Lord as part of our salvation. 3:14, 15a
B. He brings them back to the basis of this faithful stand which is their
relationship with and walk with the Lord Himself. His closing exhortation is
that they are to devote themselves to Him by growing in His grace and
knowledge. The Lord Himself had stressed this maintenance of a close
relationship with Himself in His final teachings in John 15:4-6. This would be a
key to their success in doing His work. 3:18
THE FIRST EPISTLE OF JOHN
INTRODUCTION
1. We know from history that John the Apostle, the brother of James and the son
of Zebedee, was the longest living apostle. Apparently, he had a life of fruitful
ministry for the Lord. Some believe that he lived as long as 95 A.D. and wrote
his final book, the Book of Revelation, only a short time before he died as a
Roman prisoner on the Island of Patmos. . He died with an clear testimony.
2. John had a long history of relationship with the Lord. Very early in the ministry
of the Lord, he and his brother James were called away from their fishing trade
to become disciples of the Lord. Matthew 4:21, 22; Mark 1:19, 20. Except for the
one time in John 21:1-8, when they returned to fishing at the suggestion of Peter,
he and his brother followed the Lord without wavering.
3. Very early in their relationship with the Lord, John, together with his brother
and Peter, became the ones especially favored by the Lord. They were taken, on
48
a number of occasions, to places to be alone with the Lord and to experience
special fellowship with Him. We see this in Mark 14:32-41 and Luke 9:28-36.
4. After the resurrection and ascension of the Lord and the coming of the Holy
Spirit, he and Peter became two of the main preachers for the Lord in
Jerusalem, and were especially brought under persecution from the Jews. SEE:
Acts, chapters 3-5. They were also considered to be leaders in the church and
were sent, for instance, to examine the work that Philip had done in Samaria.
SEE: Acts 8:14-25.
5. We do not hear a great deal about the ministries of John after Paul began his
missionary journeys, but the three epistles he wrote, I, II and III John, and the
Book of Revelation seem to indicate that he had a very broad influence among
the believers and the churches of Asia. This would seem to indicate that he had
traveled and ministered widely in that area in later years.
6. Some of the early church fathers wondered whether or not he had written all of
the books that bore his name. However, comparisons between the five books
attributed to him would indicate that the same person had authored them all,
and that their contents would perfectly fit the character and nature of John. The
early doubts about his authorship could have come because several of them
came to be widely known and used only many years after his death.
THE ADDRESSEES OF THE FIRST EPISTLE OF JOHN
1. The opening statement in this epistle, I John 1:1, which refers to things seen and
heard and experienced in the life of the author, presupposes that the Gospel of
John had already been written and that perhaps the same people who received
that Gospel were also now reading this first epistle written by John.
2. John is therefore led by the Spirit to build upon the Gospel of John, so that the
readers fully understand not only the importance of relationship with the Lord
but also their responsibilities in that relationship.
3. Most Bible teachers believe that this epistle, and all of the other writings of John,
were addressed to people beyond just the Jewish believers. Rather, they were
sent to the people and churches of Asia, mostly Gentile in background and
nature, to fully inform them of all that the Lord had done and the spiritual
relationship they were to have with Him. This is especially seen in the Book of
Revelation which is specifically addressed to the seven churches, but these things
would apply to the other books written by John as well.
49
1. The Gospel of John was written to set forth clearly the Deity of Christ and how one
could both have relationship with Him and walk in Him. The emphasis of I John seems
to be different, however. While the Gospel of John emphasizes HOW to have
relationship with the Lord, this first epistle of John emphasizes the PROOF of that
relationship with Him, to help the readers determine whether those who PROFESS
salvation really POSSESS that salvation by the evidence that comes from their lives.
2. This epistle does not deny the true MEANS of our salvation as some would claim, for
there is a brief passage on the means of our salvation in chapter 5:11-13. Rather, it
examines how we may have CERTAINTY that we have a true faith and relationship
with Him. This is brought out in the many PROOFS that the epistle states are necessary
to give us full assurance of our salvation.
3. John is maintainng that if a person “SAYS” that he has truly been saved and yet has no
PROOF of that salvation in his life and walk in the world, then it may be doubtful that
that person has truly trusted the Lord and come into relationship with Him.
4. We can therefore state that the main purpose for the epistle is to give professing
believers the CERTAINTY that they have truly been saved. This will stop them from
making superficial statements about their salvation which have no real basis as far as
their hearts are concerned, and which give them no real eternal acceptance with God.
Rather, it will force them to examine themselves “whether they be in the faith.” SEE: II
Corinthians 13:5
1. From the nature and contents of the epistle, it seems certain that it was written
rather late in this first century. It also seems certain that it was written
sometime after the deaths of Peter and Paul. It appears that the persecutions
under Nero had ceased and that other problems now faced the churches of Asia
and Europe.
2. Most Bible teachers believe that the Gospel of John and the three epistles that
John wrote were all written around 85 A.D. They were written while John was
still free and active in ministry, and express the burden that he had to keep the
church solidly based on the TRUTH and free from all error.
I. INTRODUCTION 1:1-4
50
III. Proving True Salvation Through Living in Love 3:1-4:21
IV. Proving True Salvation Through Making Certain of our Faith 5:1-12
I. INTRODUCTION 1:1-4
B. The importance of this personal testimony (SEE ALSO: The purposes for the
entire Gospel of John) are NOT ONLY to prove Who the Lord is by His
teachings and claims about Himself (SEE: The Gospel of John, chapters 3-10),
all the proofs that He gave during His earthly ministry concerning His
Divinity by the works that He did (SEE: The Gospels of Matthew, Mark and
Luke), the validity of the salvation that He brought and the confirmation of
all of this by the Father Himself in His three public declarations from heaven
(SEE: Luke 3:23; 9:35 and John 12:38), BUT ALSO to establish John’s own
place as a valid and authoritative witness of all of this so that there would be
no possibility of any error, doubt or misunderstanding by the readers of what
he is sharing with them in this epistle. SEE ALSO: II Peter 1:16-18.
51
C. We note John’s background with the Lord:
1. His early call to follow the Lord by leaving his fishing profession for the
spiritual task of becoming a “fisherman for men.” Mark 1:19, 20
2. His favored and intimate relationship with the Lord Luke 9:28-34
3. His witnessing of all the main miracles of the Lord Luke 9:11-17
D. Therefore, when he speaks of having “heard, seen, looked at and touched” the
things that happened when the Lord was on the earth, he would be one of the
most highly qualified to speak of these things and to apply the truth of them to
his readers.
E. He is now sharing with these readers his own position in relationship with the
Lord and earnestly desiring that they would make his heart glad both by their
saving faith and their complete obedience to these teachings.
1. When Christ has come into our lives, there are changes that take place in our
lives. One of the main changes that comes is that we are no longer oriented
toward our old relationship with the family of Satan (SEE: Ephesians 2:1-3)
and the darkness that that relationship involved, and are now oriented toward
the Lord and the Light that He brings into our lives.
52
2. When a professing believer continues to walk in the darkness of the old life and
relationship with Satan and his family, with no interest in walking in the Light,
it casts doubt on his salvation. SEE:Romans 6:1-14; Colossians 3:1-3
1. When a person is truly saved, he will have a deep concern about the daily sins
that he commits and how they affect his life and his relationship with the
Lord.
2. He will not permit those sins to accumulate in his life over a period of time,
hurting his relationship and fellowship with the Lord. Rather, he will daily
deal with them by confessing them and having them cleansed from his life.
SEE: John 15:1-3; I John 1:9.
3. Daily dealing with those sins also helps him to desire to live more righteously
before God and to avoid the daily temptations he faces by choosing to leave the
sins they present and to live righteously in relationship with the Lord.
1. One of the ministries of the Lord, now in heaven at the right hand of the
Father, is that of constantly interceding on our behalf before the Father. SEE:
Hebrews 7:25.
2. His intercession has to do with the daily temptations we face, and the daily sins
we commit. For the one who has truly trusted Him as Savior, these are already
covered/forgiven by His shed blood (SEE: I John 1:7), and, as this passage
suggests, this is constantly brought to the attention of the Father by the Lord.
1. The Lord, in his final instructions to His followers (SEE: John, chapters 14-16)
emphasized this truth several times. In John 14;21-24, He speaks of obeying
His commandments as a proof our love for Him. In John 15:10, he speaks of
our obedience to His commandments as a certain means of abiding/living in
His love. In John 15:12, he uses loving one another as an example of obeying
53
Him. In John 15:14, he says that obedience to His commands maintains their
friendship with Him.
2. In this section, vs. 3-8, John is emphasizing that our obedience to the
commands of the Lord is a proof of our salvation. When someone says that he is
saved, but has no concern for obeying the Lord Who saved him, it casts doubt
on his salvation and God will deal with him. SEE: Deuteronomy 30:15-20.
1. This is also a teaching that the Lord emphasized in his final discussions with
His followers in John, chapters 14-16. We see this in John 15:12 and 17, where
He seems to not only discuss their relationship with each other but with all who
would believe in Him.
2. In this section in I John and in much of the next major section in I John, 3:1-
4:21, this will be one of the major themes, with the emphasis upon love for
others as a proof of salvation. He will greatly expand on this theme with even
stronger emphasis on it as one of the main PROOFS of our salvation.
3. The importance of this repeated emphasis is that if a person is claiming to be
saved and walking in the Light, but has no love in his heart for others, then
there is doubt that he has ever truly been saved.
1. It is interesting that his entire emphasis is upon men. This does not indicate a
superiority of men over women or a lack of equality between them, but it does
indicate that the leadership of the work is the responsibility of men, and it is
important that they are models of demonstrated spiritual faith and conduct.
2. His reference to “little children” perhaps has to do with new Christians rather
than literally talking about small children of a young age. From the time they
first trust Christ, they are to demonstrate their relationship to Him in their life
and conduct before others.
3. We also note that he speaks both of younger and older men and is commending
all of them for their faith and conduct. He also speaks without criticism of any
of those whom he is addressing and this speaks of a generation of faithful
Christians and leaders he is leaving behind as he finishes his life. If these have
come as a result of the work he has done, it also speaks well of his faithful and
spiritual work for God.
54
1. We note that this is a subject that is discussed in a number of the New
Testament epistles. For instance, Paul emphasizes this truth very strongly in
Romans, chapter 6, Galatians, chapters 5, 6, Ephesians, chapters 4, 5, 6, and
Colossians, chapters 3, 4. James and Peter also emphasize this truth in their
epistles.
4. It is true that this strong teaching might cause some to doubt their
salvation when there has been even the slightest lapse in separation
from sin into lives of holiness before God.
b. The passage in I John, chapter 2, is not denying the presence and problem of
daily sins that need to be confessed and dealt with. SEE: John 15:1-3; I John
1:9. Rather, it is dealing with the general condition of the life of the person
who professes to be saved, and the fact that the lives of many professing
Christians have little evidence of holiness and relationship with the Lord in
them.
1. These people are representatives of Satan himself, but are not the same as the
BEAST who will arise in Revelation, chapter 13, who will arise to rule the
earth for three and a half years before the coming of the Lord who will finally
rule and reign. Literally, they are the “against Christ” people, acting as agents
of Satan himself in seeking to hinder or destroy the faith of people.
2. We note that some of these had actually been members of their assemblies,
claiming to be one with them in Christ, but they went out FROM them to deny
55
the Lord and oppose Him. They were like the Judaizer pretenders of
Galatians, chapter 1-4, who were pretending to be one with the Galatian
Christians but who were teaching them a false Gospel related to the Law of
Moses rather than the true Gospel of the finished work of Christ given to us as
a gift of God’s GRACE through FAITH alone.
1. Strong unwavering faith is a constant theme in the New Testament. SEE: John
8:31; 12:5:9; Acts 13:43; I Corinthians 15:58; Colossians 1:23; I Timothy 4:16.
2. As we can see in the first part of vs. 23, this strong unwavering faith and stand
for the Lord is the only answer to the dangers they face of yielding to the
teachings of the anti-Christs and leaving the Truth they had been following. In
vs. 26, John points out that the maintenance and protection of their faith is the
reason for his strong teaching, and that this teaching will help both warn and
guard them in their stand for the faith.
3. In this passage, he uses the phrase. “abide in the Son,” which is similar to the
phrase the Lord had used in John 15:-4-6.
J. Abiding in Him and living righteously proves to God and other people that
we are walking in the Light. SEE: John 15:4-6. 2:27, 28
56
2. We know that relationship with Christ in salvation will, in fact, PRODUCE
righteous living as He works and moves in our lives by the Holy Spirit. Lack of
righteousness in our lives would make us doubt that there is any such working
and moving of the Lord in our lives and that we lack a saving relationship with
Him.
3. In v. 27 he speaks of those who are not really living righteously. If they are
truly saved in the eyes of God, they are going to be deeply ashamed at the
coming of the Lord and may seek to “shrink back in shame from Him at His
coming.” We also know, from II Corinthians 5:9-11, that all Christians will face
the “judgment seat of Christ” following His coming, where we will all be judged
for rewards according to how we have lived our lives as Christians. Such
careless and indifferent people will especially be judged at this time. In I
Corinthians 3:12-17, Paul speaks of the fact that the division in that church
over the personalities of Peter, Apollos and himself has made him realize that
God will hold him accountable for accepting or encouraging such division.
III. PROVING TRUE SALVATION BY LIVING
IN LOVE 3:1-4:21
In this section, we note that several different subjects are discussed, including
holiness, the rise of false spirits and the means of testing by the Holy Spirit what is
true and what is false, but the main theme, recurring again and again, is the LOVE
that God Himself demonstrates for mankind (SEE: John 3:16; Romans 5:8; 9-11; I
John 3:1, 2) and the LOVE we are to demonstrate in our own lives toward others.
Is it possible that the inclusion of these other teachings is meant to emphasize that
false spirits are not only teaching lies about the Lord Himself, but that they are also
deceiving Christians into ignoring or taking carelessly their responsibilities before
God and their relationships with other Christians.
We can see this danger today as so many Christians have little concern for the way
God feels about their daily lives and how they themselves feel about others. They
treat these things, what God feels and their own approach to others, as options
rather than necessities in their lives and so live their lives with little concern.
1. In the New Testament, we notice how many times the examples of the Father
(SEE: John 14:21) and the Son are set before us. The example of Christ, for
instance, is used again and again to challenge us to live lives in this world that
will not only please God but will also make an impact on others.
a. John 13:1-16 uses the example of the Lord in washing the feet of his disciples
to teach that He is our example in SERVANTHOOD as we devote ourselves
to serving others.
57
b. Romans 15:1-4 uses the example of the Lord in not pleasing Himself in
making possible our salvation by the sacrifice of Himself, to teach us the
necessity of PLEASING OTHERS rather than ourselves. This means that we
would be willing to give up our own desires and habits for the sake of not
offending anyone else.
d. Ephesians 4:32 uses the example of God forgiving us our sins because of
Christ, to teach us that we also are to FORGIVE one another.
f. I Peter 4:1, 2 uses the example of the sufferings of Christ to teach us that we
also are to be willing to SUFFER as we live in the flesh.
g. I John 3:16 uses the example of Christ laying His life for us to teach us that
we are also to be willing to lay down our lives/make any possible sacrifice for
the brethren.
2. In these verses, we have the example of the greatness of the love of the Father
in permitting us, who were hopeless lost sinners and enemies of His before we
were saved, to be called the sons of God and to have before us a glorious
future.
3. Therefore, the example of His great eternal love for us should motivate us to
live righteously before Him and also to show love to others.
1. In the light of all that He has done for us in bringing us into relationship with
Himself, and in the light of the fact that the one Who has accomplished all this
is perfectly holy, we also should be concerned that we strive for holiness in our
own lives so that our lives may bring praise and honor to Him in thanks and
gratitude for all that He means to us.
2. The basis for this challenge for us to follow His example of holiness in our own
lives reminds us of the basis for the dedication of our lives given in Romans
12:1a, where God pleads with us on the basis of the MERCY that God has
58
poured out upon us in saving us from our hopeless lost condition and bringing
us into an eternal relationship with Himself.
1. The main purpose for the coming of the Lord into the world was to deal with
sin in mankind. Sin had separated mankind from God and caused them to be
considered the enemies of God. SEE: Romans 5:1. This sin could only be dealt
with by the sacrificial death of the Lord on the Cross (SEE: II Corinthians
5:21), making it possible that mankind could be saved and made righteous by
coming to the Father through Him. SEE: John 14:6; Acts 4:12.
2. Having been saved and having been given a righteous standing before God, it
is important for Christians to recognize and accept that God is not satisfied
just to cause mankind to have a righteous standing before Him in salvation.
a. I John 3:8 teaches that the Lord came into the world not only to save us from
our sins, but also to deal with the whole matter of sin in the world. He came to
also to defeat the devil and to destroy His works.
b. I John 3:9 goes on to teach that IF “His seed is in us” we are to share His
purpose in resisting sin and the attempts of the Devil to lead us astray.
4. In this portion of Scripture, John is dealing with the possibility that some
professing Christians are standing on what they believe is their righteous
standing before God in salvation without any concern at all for the
righteousness of their daily walk before Him.
a. This idea in Romans 6 is the thought that a true Christian could not possibly
have such an attitude of indifference to God’s expectations for him so that he
feels free to go on living in sin. In genuine salvation, such an attitude would be
removed from him so that he would be incapable of entertaining it. Rather, he
would be conscious of the need to be holy and would seek that rather than sin.
59
b. Again, the idea here is not “sinless perfection” as some teach, but it is the idea
that the true Christian is not satisfied with the presence of sin in his life and is
continually dealing with any sin that comes into his life (SEE: John 15:1-3; I
John 1:9) and is striving to live righteously before God with the help of the
indwelling Holy Spirit in his life. SEE: Galatians 5:16
D. True love in our hearts for others proves our salvation. 3:10b-21
1. Having introduced this subject of our love for others in chapter 2, vs. 10, 11, he
now goes into a deeper discussion of it as one of the proofs that we are truly
saved.
2. This entire teaching is based on the fact that God in His love made possible our
salvation and that the love of Christ now dwells in our hearts and brings us
under His control, causing us to devote our lives to Him. SEE: II Corinthians
5:14 15; Philippians 1:20, 21
3. We notice how strongly he opens this section concerning our love for others as
he compares those who do not love others with the children of the Devil and
those who do not belong to God at all.
a. He uses the example of Cain who murdered his brother to describe professing
Christians who have no love for the brethren. His meaning is that not loving the
brethren is like committing murder in our hearts. SEE: Matthew 5:21-26; I
John 3:10b-15. We either love them or hate them. Lack of love causes us to
stand judged before God. There is no ground in between.
b. The Lord had used the same comparison in the Sermon on the Mount in
Matthew 5:21-26 when he spoke of those who were angry with their brother. He
is saying that murder is not just an act that is committed but that it begins in
the heart when there is hatred or anger against another person. In the eyes of
God, both the act and the heart attitudes are condemned. The only way to be
right before God is to be reconciled with the brother so that all anger and
hatred is gone and our hearts are clean before Him.
a. He speaks of the way the Lord had laid down his life for us to save us from
our sins and uses this illustration to teach that we also should be willing to
make any sacrifice on behalf of others, no matter what it might cost us. 3:16
60
a similar illustration in James 2:14-18 to show how empty a profession of
salvation would be when compassion is lacking for the need of another person.
c. He stresses that true love is not simply some profession that we speak with
words, but it demonstrates itself in DEEDS. Where the words stand alone
without the deeds to validate them, there is no true love present. SEE: 3:18.
1. As noted before, in His final instructions to his disciples before He was tried and
went to the Cross, the Lord put special emphasis upon obedience to God and
the Lord Himself. SEE: John 14:21, 23, 24; 15:10, 12, 17. He emphasized that
this would be a proof of their relationship with Him and their love for Him.
SEE ALSO: I Samuel 15:22, 23, where Saul wanted to offer animals to God
rather than to obey Him.
2. He emphasizes that two of the main commandments from God are that we have
true faith in the Lord and that we love one another. The Lord had stressed
these same two truths in His discussions with the Pharisees. SEE: Mark 12:28-
33. The Lord had called them the heart/the summing up of the Law when
challenged by a Scribe.
3. Throughout the Scriptures, obedience before God was to be from the heart
rather than being just mere assent to what God commanded and expected of
His people. Heart obedience will also prove itself by actions.
a. God not only emphasized whole hearted devotion to the Law and obedience in
giving His Law to Israel (SEE: Isaiah 57:15; 66:2, 4), but He wanted that
devotion and obedience to deeply affect their entire lives.
b. The Psalmist reaffirms this again and again in Psalms 119, when he uses
phrases such as “with my whole heart,” “I long for” and others to express his
approach in understanding and following the Law of God.
c. Israel was following the practice that so many Christians today follow of going
through all the FORMS of obedience but never really obeying from the heart
so that TRUE holiness would be present in their lives. SEE: Isaiah, chapter 58.
The Israelites, in this the passage from Isaiah, chapter 58, protested to God
that they were faithfully following all the forms of the Law and wondered why
God did not seem to accept this approach and bless them. God answered them
61
that these forms they claimed to be following never really led to a righteous
stand before God that revealed itself in their actions in the world. Therefore,
the forms had no value and were rejected by God.
F. The rise of false teaching and the need to spiritually test everything 4:1-6
1. False teaching can come in many forms. It can not only distort what we are to
BELIEVE but also how we are to ACT as we live in this world. Satan is a clever
foe, and if he cannot teach us falsely in one way he will do it in another. There
are, therefore, many Christians who are very orthodox in their beliefs, refusing
to compromise those beliefs in any way, but who have been led astray in their
conduct and manner of life as they live in this world.
2. It is the distortion that false teaching brings to the way we ACT that gives this
section its close connection with the subject of the love that we are to show to
others. Satan, if he can’t lead us astray in what we believe, causes us to have a
sense of contentment in simply “resting” in our theological beliefs, and takes
away any sense of urgency of proving the presence of those beliefs in our
relationships with others. Either way, he has led us astray and gained for us the
disapproval of God.
62
c. The false teaching in this passage is centered in the PERSON of Christ. The
false teachers are either changing the Truth about Him into a lie or they are
denying Him altogehr. False teachers today have the same problem in regard
to the PERSON of Christ. They can accept everything else about Him except
that He is the Divine Son of God. They are willing to admit His fame as a
teacher, leader, example and others things, but not that He holds the unique
place of authority, ability and power as the Divine Son of God.
d. Such false teachers are not only to be rejected, but they are also to be treated
as unbelievers and people of the world of the Devil. There can be no
compromise with them by permitting them to remain in the body of believers
to see if they will change. They pose a grave danger to the other believers and
their continued presence and influence is not to be tolerated.
b. We note again that, in considering this form of false teaching, if the true
PERSON of Christ is attacked and convincingly denied, the entire foundation
for the Christian faith and salvation would be destroyed in the hearts and lives
of those who follow and proclaim such false teaching. There would no longer
be any basis for hope for relationship with God and for eternity with Him in
their lives.
c. This false teaching would also bring a state of hopelessness in the lives of those
they influence. In rejecting the central truth of God’s plan of salvation, the
Deity of Christ, there be no possible solution to the need of their sinful hearts.
d. Their clever influence on others would also bring doubt even to the hearts of
sincere Christians if this teaching were permitted to continue in the assembly.
e. Therefore, the Truth concerning His place as the Divine Son of God must be
vigorously defended and false teachers strongly dealt with. The entire body of
believers must be united in such action, for Satan is clever enough to enlist
some of the believers to defend those who are false teachers on the basis of
their family ties, their friendships and other bases.
G. Love of others follows God’s own example and prepares for judgment. 4:7-21
1. This passage is the fourth major discussion of this subject concerning love for
others.
a. In chapter 2, vs. 10, 11, he had introduced the subject by emphasizing that it is
not enough just to verbally proclaim one’s own faith and salvation. If that
profession is not accompanied by love for others, then the faith and salvation is
questionable.
b. In chapter 3, vs. 1-3, he had emphasized again the love of God for us by
teaching that even His permitting us to be His children and for us to be called
63
the sons of God is an evidence and an example of the unlimited love that He
has for us.
d. In this fourth section dealing with this subject, his emphasis will be on love as
part of the very NATURE OF GOD. Those who truly belong to Him will also
have love as part of their nature as well. Having such love as part of their
nature wins them the approval of God and prepares them for the coming
judgment of Christians. SEE: II Corinthians 3:10-15; 5:9-11.
2. We see how this section carefully examines this argument concerning the nature
of those who claim they belong to God.
a. Those who love others belong to God because God Himself is love, 4:7, 8
1) It is important to note that loving others does not replace or precede true
heart faith in the Lord Jesus Christ as the basis for loving others.
a) Some unsaved people who show love for others in their daily lives, even more
fervently than some Christians, might be tempted to draw this wrong
conclusion by declaring that loving others is all they need before God and is
the proof of God’s acceptance of them.
b) To the contrary, true love for others must be built upon the foundation of
saving faith in the Lord, and the work of regeneration and molding that He
does in our lives in that saving relationship with Him by the Holy Spirit.
2) This passage is teaching that, for professing Christians who believe they have
been saved from their sins through Christ, love for others is the proof that
they truly belong to God. It is not their own human love that is the proof, but
it is the evidence of the love of God working in and through their lives in
reaching out to others in love that is the real proof of this relationship with
Him..
b. God proved His love by giving His Son for us, 4:9, 10
1) He had first introduced this Truth of the love that God has demonstrated for
us in the giving of His Son as a means of testing the love in our own hearts in
John 3:16. In that passage the greatness of God’s love and the example and
challenge it presents to us is set forth.
2) In Philippians 2:5-8, this giving of His Son, and all that it involved (the steps
he had to take as the Divine Son of God in coming down from heaven to be in
64
human form , and the sacrifice of Himself for our sins), is set forth as an
example of the way we are to treat each other in the body of believers.
3) In this passage, I John 4:9, 10, he is showing that God’s love in giving His Son
for us is the greatest possible example and demonstration of love. It was
demonstrated without any love on our part for Him being involved in making
possible our salvation and deliverance from sin and its penalty. It was entirely
of God’s with no worthiness or response from us in our hopeless lost condition.
It is only when His love has reached us and indwells us that we love Him.
c Loving others proves that we fully appreciate what He has done, 4:11
1) The love and Mercy of God toward us in all that He has done for us in making
possible our salvation is the basis for our expressing our thanks and
appreciation for what He has done by dedicating ourselves completely to Him.
3) This truth is something that applies to the lives of all Christians as they
recognize what His love has done for them, and respond to it with deep thanks
to God and commitment of life to Him.
1) God by His Holy Spirit lives in the life of every Christian. He comes there to
dwell at the very instant of salvation (SEE: Romans 8:9) and makes His
presence known through the work that He does in our lives in meeting our
deepest needs.
2) For a professing believer to have His presence in his life but not to
demonstrate that presence in the way he lives and conducts himself in his
daily life would raise the question whether that person really belongs to Him
at all.
65
that we are abiding/living in the Father, 4:14, 15
1) In chapter 3, vs. 23 he had stressed that fully believing in the Name of the Son
is a proof of our obedience to Him. This also seems to be the meaning of the
phrase “confess” in Romans 10:9, 10, where it seems to emphasize the change
in life and testimony that comes through true faith in Him. We can therefore
say that confessing Him, as taught in these two verses in John, chapter 4,
begins with our strong faith in Him that changes our lives and our testimony.
2) In these verses, however, we are not only to believe in Him in the depth of our
heart faith, but we are also to take a stand for Him and fully confess Him
before others in our daily lives as proof of our relationship with Him.
a) The Lord had emphasized the same truth as He set forth the standards for
those who wanted to be qualify as His followers in Luke 9:23-26. In vs. 26, he
speaks of those who are ashamed of Him before others and how He Himself
will be ashamed of them at His coming.
b) Peter and John understood and experienced what it would cost them in
taking an open and unashamed stand for the Lord in Acts, chapters 4, 5. It
not only meant hatred and open opposition from those Jewish leaders in
Jerusalem, but it also meant that they would experience imprisonment for
His
sake. Jesus had promised this, in fact, in John 15:18-25, and the disciples both
understood this teaching and accepted it as one of the conditions for
following Him.
c) Paul, in Romans 1:16 speaks of His open and unashamed stand for the Lord
and for His Gospel. In Paul’s life, from the very beginning of His relationship
with the Lord (SEE: Acts, chapter 9), taking such an unashamed stand for the
Lord would mean facing the hatred and open opposition of many to whom he
would seek witness for the Lord. It would include beatings and imprisonment
and many other hardships. SEE: II Corinthians 4:7-12; 11:22-33. In spite of
all of this, he took his stand without hesitation and wavering.
3) Such an unashamed stand for the Lord in confessing Him openly is not to be
resented or treated as something unfair or unjust that God has laid upon us,
but is to be done joyfully in the light of all that He has done for us and means
to us. These evidences of His love for us in our lives far outweigh anything
that we might experience for Him. SEE: Philippians 1:12-18; 4:11-13.
66
ever trusting in the Lord Jesus Christ as their Savior from sin. No Christian
will have any part in that “GREAT WHITE THRONE” judgment, no matter
how much they may have failed in their Christian lives to please Him and live
for Him after they came into saving relationship with Him.
b. However, all Christians will face judgment before the Lord Himself. Besides
this passage in I John 4:16-18, The judgment of Christians is taught in such
passages as I Corinthians 3:11-15, where Paul is putting special emphasis
upon the judgment of WORKERS for God such as Apollos and himself, and
II Corinthians 5:9-ll, where Paul emphasizes the judgment of ALL Christians
in this judgment.
2) It follows the coming of the Lord in the RAPTURE when all of God’s people
will stand before the Lord in heaven and be judged. From all of the relevant
passages dealing with the Rapture, this judgment will take place in heaven
itself during that seven year period of time when the tribulation is going on on
the earth. Contrary to the teaching of some, we will not be on the earth during
that time of tribulation but will be caught away/caught up before it begins
and will be in heaven with the Lord. SEE: I Thessalonians 4:13-17.
3) At that judgment we will be judged “for what we have done in the body
whether it be good or bad.” SEE: II Corinthians 5:11. The purpose of this
judgment is NOT condemnation or the denial of our eternal place in heaven
with Him, but it has to do with the examining of the lives we have lived. Then
we will experience the approval or disapproval of the Lord (SEE: I
Corinthians 3:13-15; II Corinthians 5:9) and will receive from Him, based on
that examination, the rewards we deserve from His hand at that time.
4) I John 2:28 and 4:18-20 make it clear that we are to so live our lives as we live
in this world so that we will be fully prepared for that judgment and will, at
that time, receive the commendation of the Lord and our proper rewards.
5) Both of these passage in I John indicate that some will not have lived their
lives in obedience to the Lord and with His approval, and will not welcome
His coming for them in the Rapture as they should. I John 2:28 indicates that
some will even “shrink back in shame from Him at His coming,” even as they
are being caught up to meet Him in the clouds with other believers.
6) It also seems clear that that judgment will mean more for us than just
rewards. Not only will much of what we seek to present to Him at that time be
considered worthless and disposed of (SEE: I Corinthians3:13, 15), but some
67
will feel the clear disappointment of the Lord in the way they have lived and
conducted their lives on the earth, and this disappointment will grieve them.
a. He concludes his study of the love that we have in our hearts for others as a
proof of our salvation by pointing out that we cannot divide our love for God
from our love for others. If love for others is absent, then love for God is also
not there.
b. While it is true that we cannot have true heart love for others without first
partaking of the love of God and having His love in our hearts, he is
emphasizing that having the love of God truly in our hearts will automatically
bring forth love for others.
c. In other passages he has emphasized that GOD IS LOVE and has poured out
His love to us in sending His Son and then in saving us from our sins. It is His
will that the love He has poured out ON us should be poured out THROUGH
us as we extend that love to others. SEE: II Corinthians 5:14.
1) Love is part of His nature and, when we are born again and come into
relationship with Him, we partake of His nature and everything He stands
for. This does not mean that we have His attributes or are equal in any way
with Him, but it does mean that His QUALITIES will be a vital part of our
lives.
2) Because we partake of His nature in regeneration, His nature will also vitally
affect our lives and change us from our old sinful ways. Our old sinful ways
brought hatred and broken relationships with others (SEE: I Corinthians,
chapters 1-4. where Paul had been led to challenge the Corinthians to
examine themselves whether they were really in the faith because of this lack
of love among them and their bitterness toward Paul himself. SEE: II
Corinthians 13:5, 6.
d. Therefore, the question here is not whether people lacking love for others have
LOST their salvation which they once had. Salvation is eternal once we have
TRULY been saved. SEE: John 10:28-30. The question would be whether or
not they have EVER been saved at all. Love for others is a valid proof of our
68
relationship with God in salvation. When that proof is lacking, then we may
well doubt that we have EVER been saved.
e. We recognize that, as we live in this world, we will not live perfectly and will
often fail to meet the standards that God has set for the Christian life. This
failing will sometimes include lack of full love for others. Deep genuine love for
others is to be our goal, however, and we should grow in our love for others
just as we grow in our love for the Lord Himself in our relationship with Him.
Our lack of perfection in meeting all of God’s standards should never be an
excuse for not desiring genuine heart love for others, and seeking God’s help in
finding and experiencing it continually in our lives as we live in this world.
1. This TESTIMONY is centered in the Lord Jesus Christ and is exact in its
teaching concerning WHO and WHAT He is as the Divine Son of God. It also
includes His purpose for coming into the world, the full extent of the WORK He
has accomplished and how we are to regard and respond to Him.
2. Any change at all in proclaiming and following the full contents of this
TESTIMONY, no matter how slight or insignificant that change might seem to
us, destroys its pure nature and its significance for us. In fact, the efforts by
those who seek to change it in any way make them disobedient to God and puts
them in the realm of being false teachers.
3. Thus, we can see that disobedience to His commands is not just disobedience in
the CONDUCT of our Christian lives after we are saved, but it first involves
disobedience in what we accept and set our hearts on as the FOUNDATIONS
for our faith found in this TESTIMONY He has given us. This does not take
away from the importance of our walk and conduct before God and others
AFTER we are saved, but it renders all of that useless if that walk and conduct
is not solidly based upon this foundation.
4. When the Lord Jesus Christ, in His final instructions to His followers in John,
chapters 14-16, emphasized their obedience to all that He had taught them, He
also was emphasizing their strict obedience to the contents of their faith as well
as to their walk before Him in their relationship with Him.
a. In the Gospel of John, for instance, the Lord had clearly set forth (SEE: John,
chapters 1-10) WHO and WHAT He is and the WORK that He would
accomplish to make possible their eternal salvation and relationship with Him.
69
This spiritual teaching came from the Divine Son of God Himself and was to
be accepted completely.
b. Though others in that day had rejected His teachings, His followers dared not
follow opposers even to the slightest degree. Their complete acceptance of
ALL that He had taught, concerning both faith and conduct, would be proof of
their love for Him and their relationship with Him.
1. Very specifically, he sets forth the exact contents of this Testimony that God
has given to us.
a. It is built upon the Person of Christ as the Divine Son of God who has the
power, authority and ability to perfectly meet our need for forgiveness of our
sins, our salvation from those sins and our eternal relationship with Him. This
has nothing to do with our worthiness before God or our own ability to have
these results apart from Christ Himself. 5:11
b. This eternal salvation, with all that it includes, comes when we exercise our
own responsibility by responding to the Testimony with true faith in the Lord
Jesus Christ as our Savior and only means of salvation. SEE: John 3:16, 36;
John 14:6; Acts 4:12; 16:31, 32; Ephesians 2:8, 9. 5:12
c. This also means that we have left every other possible means that we have ever
sought or followed to accomplish this result, and are relying solely on Him.
2. It is only by this strict obedience to the Testimony God has given that we cn
have complete assurance (“that ye may KNOW”) of our salvation. To follow it
less strictly is not only a completely false approach to salvation but it also would
leave us with doubts concerning salvation and our eternal future. 5:13
A. In dealing with the subject of effective prayer in meeting the needs of ourselves
and others, he is dealing with one of the many possibilities that our salvation
opens for us when we have True faith in the Lord. The use of effective prayer is
a possibility that is often neglected by Christians.
70
of faith and must be from the hearts of those who pray, but it can bring results
in the condition of that person for whom we pray.
C. In this passage, I John 5:14-17, he is teaching that those who are used to pray
for others should be spiritual Christians themselves so that their prayers will be
heard by God. SEE: Psalms 66:2. Their fervent prayer, coming from clean and
approved hearts and lives, will have favor with God.
1. In giving this teaching, he is not denying the need for that person to accept his
own responsibility before God to truly repent of the sin and to do all that
repentance demands in his life.
a. Our prayer is not a substitute for the person exercising his own responsibility
before God and doing what he is supposed to do to gain forgiveness and
restoration to right fellowship with God.
b. In true repentance, there is first the recognition of the sin, then the confession
of the sin that brings the forgiveness of God to that life and finally the
abandoning of the sin that was committed so that it will not be committed
again.
c. We recognize in this teaching that if the person himself is finally, after all our
prayer on his behalf, not willing to accept his full responsibility, then our
prayer will not prevail in his life.
d. Our prayer is directed to God on behalf of the person who may not yet realize
his need or come yet to the place where he will do something about it.
2. Rather, he is teaching that fervent and effective prayer will HELP bring that
person to the point of repentance and then HELP him do all that he is supposed
to do in repentance to bring the forgiveness of God.
3. This prayer may begin before that person actually is ready to acknowledge his
need and do something about it. When he is ready to respond, the prayer on his
behalf then follows through the whole matter of repentance and restoration in
the life of that person until it is complete.
4. This entire teaching emphasizes the burden that we are to have for each other
and our heart willingness to respond to ANY need in the lives of our brethren.
It is this heartfelt response to their needs that proves that we truly love them.
71
their lives will be changed so that in life and conduct they will no longer live in
the realm of Satan but will be devoted to holiness and strict obedience to God
and His commandments.
B. His whole purpose in being inspired by God to write to them has been to bring
them into true relationship with God through the Lord Jesus Christ, so that
their lives completely conform to that relationship both in their faith and
conduct. It is now their responsibility to strictly heed these teachings.
1. As previously noted, some of the early church fathers doubted that John the
Apostle had written these two epistles. Their doubts were based on the fact that
these two epistles were not generally known and distributed until many years
after the death of John.
2. However, not only does the style and nature of these two epistles perfectly fit
with the style and nature of the other books John had written (the Gospel of
John and I John), but the late general appearing of these books does not take
away from their authenticity. They simply took longer to be widely read and
gathered together with other books of the Canon of the New Testament.
3. We conclude therefore that the Apostle John wrote both of these epistles.
Though his purpose in writing them seems different from that of I John, John is
meeting the urgent need of his day to combat the rising false teaching that
characterized this last part of the first Century.
1. Dr. Tenney points out that these epistles are more personal than I John, for they
seem to be directed to individuals or to single churches rather than to a broad
group of Christians and churches.
72
b. In III John, he refers to a pastor or leader named Gaius as the one to whom it is
directly addressed. We presume that Gauis was the pastor of a local church and
also was to share its contents with the church whose problems were being
discussed in this epistle. Gauis could also use it to admonish his flock in their
toleration of bad conduct.
2. We assume that these addressees were also mostly Gentiles in some area of Asia
known to John and of special concern to him. As the last living Apostle, he felt a
special burden to keep them straight in their beliefs and walk before the Lord
before his generation would pass away.
1. We note that the purposes for the two epistles are different.
a. II John is mainly concerned with the false teachers that were beginning to
plague the church at that time. In I John, he had dealt somewhat with these
false teachers, warning against some of their main errors, but in II John he
takes a very stern approach to even welcoming them or showing any kind of
warmth to them. From the beginning there had always been false teachers
(SEE: The Book of Galatians), but at this point in time, they were bolder in
attacking even the Person of Christ rather than just attacking the true salvation
He had come to bring.
b. In III John, he is mainly concerned with how the church is handling their
affairs and conducting itself rather than with theological matters. He notes the
bad attitude of one of the main men in the church and the way they had treated
faithful workers for the Lord.
2. The main thing to note about both of these epistles is that they are facing the
problems of the day, both theological and practical, and are warning against a
departure from the teaching and standards that had been passed on to them.
3. Both of these epistles reflect the theological and practical problems faced by the
church of today, and their teaching is just as relevant for the church today as it
was for the church of that day. We face the same enemy of the truth, Satan, who
will continually seek to distort the Truth and lead people astray. He will work in
the hearts of the unsaved as well as God’s own people to hinder the work of God.
73
I. SALUTATION ON BEHALF OF THE TRUTH Vs. 1-4
A. As noted before, the phrase, “the elect lady”, may not at all refer to a literal
woman as some teach. Rather, it more probably refers to a single church to
whom he is writing and whom he gives this title of “elect lady”. Thus, Paul, in
Philemon, I and II Timothy and Titus, is the only one actually addressing his
epistles to individuals. 1a
B. Therefore, as it also seems to be true in III John, where he addresses his epistle
to a man called Gaius, this epistle is not generally directed to all of the Gentile
churches in the area but is specifically designed to meet the needs of one
particular church that has come to his attention as one going through spiritual
problems that need to be dealt with.
C. Five times in these three and a half verses, he repeats the phrase “TRUTH.”
This will be the entire theme of this short epistle, approached in various ways.
D. His reason for the emphasis upon this theme is clear. If they have everything
else in their lives but are not firmly standing upon the TRUTH, they have
nothing at all to stand on in their lives. If they permit anyone to rob them of the
TRUTH either by denyiug it or changing it in any way, they will lose everything
dear to them in their relationship with God through the Lord Jesus Christ.
74
E. The TRUTH is therefore to be their main focus, and is something that they are
both to love and to be absolutely faithful to. They are both to stand in it and
defend it with all their hearts.
F. In preparation for the strong teaching he will give them in vs. 7-11 on the
subject of defending the Truth by dealing strongly with the false teachers
among them, he points out that only SOME (SEE: vs. 4) of them are following
the Truth. He would have liked to have commended the whole church, but he
cannot do that because the church is divided between those following the Truth
and those who are not. This serves as a rebuke to this church.
G. As we noted in the study of I John, we see the authority that John has in
writing the strong words of this epistle, and the respect they are to have for the
way he expresses himself as well as his right to believe that they will have a
complete willingness to obey what he says.
A. The love that he refers to here is not just the love that God has shown to them
in the sending of the Lord to save them from their sins and the bringing of their
hearts to Him. Rather, it is the love of the Lord, in and through their hearts as
Christians, working to give them a sincere love for others.
B. As we have noted before, Paul speaks of the working of this LOVE in his own
heart in motivating him to devote Himself completely to the Lord Jesus Christ,
living for Him and making Him the absolute priority in his life, and to preach
the Gospel that the Lord has entrusted to him. SEE: II Corinthians 5:14, 15
C. The presence of His love in our hearts will also cause us to follow the Truth that
He gives us without compromise or wavering. Any compromise or wavering
would be a proof that perhaps His love is not even in our hearts and that we are
not saved.
A. He first speaks of the numbers of those who are deceivers in their day and
identifies their main denial of the Truth that they proclaim. Later, he will
speak of the deceivers in their very midst that they will need to strongly deal
with, but, as he introduces the presence and work of these people to them, he
first is emphasizing that they come from the world and are present everywhere
in the world. Their origin is Satan’s own realm, and they work as His agents in
going everywhere deceiving people. SEE: Matthew 4:1-11, where Satan was
tempting the Lord; 7:15-18; Ephesians 2:1-3; 6:10-18; and I John 1:18, 19.
75
B. Their main denial of the Truth is not just a denial of His Deity. Rather, it now
centers on a denial of His very coming into the world. Vs. 7. SEE I John 2:4.
1. The number of years that had passed in the Church Age and the situation of
these believers made the rise of this false teaching possible.
a. We note that these readers in this church lived many years after the birth and
ministry of the Lord on the earth, and His death, burial, resurrection and
ascension back to heaven again, 4.B.C. to 30 A.D.
b. Few of the readers would even have been alive during those years of the
earthly life and ministry of the Lord. Perhaps none of them who would have
lived during those years had ever seen Him during that earthly ministry. Being
Gentiles living in other parts of Asia, they would have had no opportunity to
even be in the places where He appeared.
2. The work of the deceivers was to put doubts in their minds concerning all that
was accomplished through the purposes and work of the Lord that John and
others are teaching them. The easiest way to do this was simply deny that there
had ever been such a person living in this world and to demand some proof of
His very existence.
3. Paul, in I Corinthians 15, written twenty-four years (54A.D.) after His death,
burial, resurrection and ascension back to heaven, was faced with the same
problem as he speaks of the proofs that supported the Gospel, including the
fact that, of the 500 people who had seen Him at one time following His
resurrection, the majority of those were still living when Paul wrote this
epistle.
4. Historically, the GNOSTICS and other false groups had arisen by this time,
and their distortions of the Truth were widely accepted by many people. These
people had difficulty accepting the full Truth concerning the Lord, but they
were willing to accept versions of His PERSON and WORK that might seem
more reasonable to them. They had a FORM of the Truth but not the Truth
itself and devoted themselves to following these false teachings.
5. We notice the strong teaching he gives in dealing with these people. vs. 9-11
a. To even welcome them or to tolerate them in the name of LOVE, even with the
sincere aim of bringing them into the Truth, as some today would argue, would
put the believers directly under their influence and open the possibility that
the believers could be easily led astray.
b. The believers were to treat them as coming from Satan himself, serving as his
deceiving agents, with no connection at all with God or with His Truth. Vs. 7, 9
76
c. Rather than such an approach of toleration, the believers were to strongly and
completely reject these deceivers, show no welcoming spirit toward them and
were to turn away from any possible contact with them.
6. If any one rejected the teaching that John was giving them and persisted in an
approach of toleration of these deceivers, John warns them that they are
making themselves participants in their evil deeds. Vs. 11
A. We note that, in following with all our hearts these teachings and the Truth
that God has given us, we open the way to have true JOY in our relationship
with the Lord. There can be no JOY from the Lord for those who compromise
His Truth or refuse to take a stand on it.
B. Following His Truth with all our hearts may seem to be difficult and may even
cut us off from the approval and friendship of well-meaning but erring fellow
Christians, but having true JOY from the Lord is to be our main desire and
nothing is to tempt us to forsake that desire.
C. The Lord Jesus Christ Himself had taught the same thing in John 15:11, where
He made it clear that their strict obedience to ALL that He had taught them
(SEE: John, chapters 14-16) would bring His joy to their lives and that that joy
would be spiritually complete in their lives.
1. We note the wide range of teachings the Lord had given them both during His
entire ministry and in this final meeting with them before His crucifixion,
recorded in John, chapters 13-17. In these chapters, the teachings had
included: servitude on behalf of others (chapter 13), their love for Him
(chapters 14, 15), the work of the Holy Spirit in and through them in the future
(chapters 14-16), their daily walk with Him (chapter 15, vs. 1-10-16), their
complete devotion to Him and submission to any persecution they might have
to go through for Him (chapter 15:18-25) and other teachings.
2. In that section, Jesus is dealing with disciples who seem to not be as spiritual as
they should have been after three and a half years of close association with
Him, and there was need to strongly warn them about the nature of His
77
standards for them and what following Him would both require and would
mean in their lives.
B. John has not yet been imprisoned on the Isle of Patmos as he will be when he
will write the Book of Revelation in 95 A.D. Therefore, he is in close
association with a local church in the place where he is dwelling. He might
even be the pastor of that local church. From his conclusion, it seems that he is
even writing these things to the needy church with the full knowledge and
encouragement of the people in his own church.
78
I. COMMENDATION TO GAIUS FOR WALKING
IN THE TRUTH Vs. 1-4
A. In writing to this Christian brother named Gaius, it is not clearly stated exactly
what position he occupied in his relationship with the church that will receive
this epistle and act upon its teachings.
1. It seems most likely that Gaius is the pastor of the church and perhaps has
alerted John to the major problem that he faces in the church as their pastor.
COMPARE: I Corinthians 1:11, where a spiritual woman, Chloe, had alerted
Paul to the dissension in the Corinthian Church over the personalities of their
teachers, Peter, Paul and Apollos.
2. Gaius himself seems to be a very spiritual man, who is faithfully following the
Truth, but he has shown a weakness in dealing with the major problem and is
appealing to John for help.
3. From vs. 4, it seems that he might even have been a convert of John’s, as John
refers to him as one of “my children,” and so they have a very close
relationship.
B. The problem that has arisen, and which will be the heart of the teaching of the
epistle, is that one of the members, Diotrophes, who perhaps is a prominent
leader in the church, has shown an evil attitude toward workers who visit the
church for ministry. He also has forcibly enlisted others in his evil actions
against these workers for God.
C. We notice first that John uses the word “TRUTH” six times in this short epistle.
SEE: Vs. 1, 3, 4 8, and 12. This phrase had also been used extensively in his
epistle of II John.
1. In II John, the phrase mostly had been used to describe the body of
REVEALED TRUTH that God has given us, that is centered in the Person and
Work of the Lord Jesus Christ. That body of revealed Truth is God’s final
revelation and is unchanging. Any departure from that body of Truth, even in
the slightest degree, means that the person who departs from it is a false teacher
and has no real relationship with the Lord.
2. In III John, however, without denying the necessity of holding fast to that
body of Truth that God has given, and of taking a strong stand on it without
compromise or wavering, he now turns to the way believers CONDUCT
themselves in holding to that body of Truth.
79
a. This is his main focus as he writes to the church. There seems to be no problem
in that church in believing and holding to the body of Truth, but some in that
church, led by Diotrophes, are bringing that body of Truth into disrepute
before others by their evil CONDUCT.
b. Unless this problem can be settled, their testimony in proclaiming that body of
Truth will be hopelessly marred and the proclamation of the Truth will suffer.
3. Thus, the body of Truth itself and the conduct of those who profess to hold to
that revealed Truth cannot be separated. If a person professes to hold to that
body of Truth, but does not show it by his conduct, his profession has no
meaning and he probably has never been saved.
1. They are to conduct themselves FAITHFULLY in the way they receive them
and treat them while they are with them. This gives the idea that they are to
treat them as those who belong to the Lord and as those who are living in strict
obedience to His commands and standards. It also gives the idea of doing this
steadfastly without wavering, so that their treatment of the brethren is
consistent and pleasing to the Lord. They are also to welcome them with respect
and submission to the teachings they have come to share. Vs. 5
2. They are to show genuine HEART LOVE for them. No matter what the
message might be that these brethren bring, including correcting them for some
fault in the church, this love is to be never failing. Vs. 6
a. We note that Paul had to continually appeal for the heart love of the
Corinthians in his second epistle to them. He had had to give them some very
stern rebukes and instructions in the first epistle he wrote to them. The result
was that they only partially obeyed him and adopted a spirit of bitterness,
criticism and lack of love toward him. SEE: II Corinthians 10:8-10; 11:1-21;
12:11-21.
b. No matter how tenderly and lovingly preachers of the Word share the Word of
God with His people, they are still required by God, in His use of them, to
preach the full Truth without compromise. No matter difficult the teaching
might be for the people of God to accept, they are to have humble and loving
attitudes in listening and responding to it, without resenting or turning against
80
the one who has shared the Word with them. These pastors and workers are
sent there by God for the care of their souls, and are to be treated as such with
respect and honor. SEE: I Thessalonians 5:12, 13; Hebrews 13:17.
3. They are to send them on their way, after their ministry among them has been
concluded, IN A MANNER WORTHY OF GOD. Vs. 6
a. This gives the idea that the believers will have fully accepted the purpose of the
ministry these men have had among them and the teaching they have shared,
have the right attitude and love toward these faithful men and have no regrets
or bitterness as they bid them farewell.
b. Because these believers share the very nature of God in their salvation and
regeneration by the Holy Spirit, His nature will be manifested (SEE:
Philippians 1:20, 21) in their lives by the way they conduct themselves in the
treatment of these workers. If there is no such manifesting of the character of
God, then they face the displeasure of God Himself.
4. Besides these manifestations of the presence of the Lord in their lives, they are
also to help with the material needs of these workers by GIVING THEM
SUPPORT. SEE: Philippians 4:10-13.
a. As those who would go from church to church in their ministry for God, these
men would often lack proper support. If they had no “sending” churches that
regularly supplied these financial needs, it would be the responsibility of each
church to which they ministered to have a part in supporting them. SEE: Luke
10:7
b. Therefore, it would not be enough to simply wish them the blessing of God but
not to actually give to them according to their needs. SEE: James 2:14-18; I
John 3:17. That would be like a denial of their relationship with the Lord who
gave everything for us.
5. None of these teachings mean that the workers themselves would be excused by
God if their approach and attitude in coming is wrong, if they have a greedy
rather than a sacrificial spirit in coming or if their manner of conduct in
ministering to the church is less than spiritual. Apparently, none of those John
has sent to them were guilty of any of these things, so it is the people themselves
who would bear the full responsibility for the way they receive and treat them.
It is the people of the church themselves who are to change in their attitudes
and conduct rather than the workers who visit them.
81
A. Although only one man, Diotrophes, is actually named as one who is sinning
against the visiting workers, he indicates that others are also involved in this
sin. He has, by threatening some of the others with expulsion if they do not join
him in his evil treatment of the workers, gained a following in the church and
these others help him in his evil actions.
2. Was this same emergence of strong willful leaders also true in the Corinthian
Church (SEE: I Corinthians, chapters 1-4) where the congregation was
divided into three or four groups following some of the different men who had
ministered among them? Was it also the influence of these same strong willful
leaders in II Corinthians, that caused the people to lose their respect for Paul
and treat him badly?
3. Others in the church seem to fear him though they may not willingly become
part of his following. However, in yielding to the threats and pressure he put
upon them. rather than to the clear teachings and standards God had set before
them for personal and church life before Him, they are equally guilty.
B. His actions are evil and John seems to regard him as he would an unsaved man
who has invaded the church and is trying to lead the believers astray. Vs. 11b
C. His actions, according the standards God has laid down in other passages (SEE:
Romans 16:17, 18; I Corinthians, chapter 5; II Thessalonians 3:6, 7. 10, 11, 14,
15; I Timothy 4:1-4; Titus 1:9-14, 16; II Peter 2:1-3, 9, 10), mean that he will
have to be disciplined and cast out of the church.
1. Discipline for this particular type of sin is taught in II Thessalonians 3:14, 15;
Titus 1:1, 2, 16; 3:10, 11; and II Peter 2:9, 10. In Titus 3:1, 2, for instance, we
are taught that we are to be subject to rulers (leaders in the church as well??)
and are not to malign or slander anyone, but it does not defend false teachers.
The other passages deal even more specifically with those who cause division
and trouble in the church.
2. The discipline called for in all of the above passages is that they are not only to
be strongly rebuked but they also are to be put out of the church so that the
believers are separated from them and will no longer be under their influence.
a. Such strong discipline is to be done in love with the possibility of restoration of
brothers and sisters in the Lord IF there truly has been repentance leading not
only to forgiveness from God but also a complete abandonment of the sin that
82
caused their expulsion from the church in the first place. SEE: II Corinthians
2:6-11; Galatians 6:1; and II Thessalonians 3:15.
b. With false teachers, however, who give no evidence, either in their teaching or
in their conduct, that they have any relationship with God at all in salvation,
the expulsion would have to be permanent. Their being permitted ever again to
be a part of the fellowship of believers would be extremely difficult, for they
were in the fellowship through deception previously, and might seek to return
to it on the same basis by only pretending to repent and abandon their false
teaching. It would be difficult to ever trust them again.
c. For men like Diotrophes and others like him who have strong overbearing
personalities, and who have used those personalities to help them in their sinful
ways, it might also be difficult and unwise to EVER permit them to return to
the fellowship of believers UNLESS there is a complete humbling of their hearts
before God and the believers. This would mean a complete and heart felt
submission to the Lord and to the authority of the church leaders, a complete
change in their attitudes and manner of life and a willingness to belong to the
fellowship of believers humbly with the possibility that God would never again
permit them to occupy a position of leadership.
A. He names one faithful man named Demetrius, who is highly commended for his
faithfulness and apparently has a good testimony among them. It is not
completely clear in this passage whether Demetrius is a visiting worker or
whether he is simply a faithful and spiritual member of their own congregation
who has not yielded to the evil attempts of Diotrophes, and is standing as a
faithful example to the other believers concerning spiritual walk before God
and spiritual relationships with other believers.
B. If this is indeed a faithful and spiritual member of their own congregation, this
high commendation is shared to point them to someone in their midst who
would be a true EXAMPLE to them of someone taking a faithful STAND for
the Lord and then WALKING in the Truth in the way he conducts himself just
as John himself does. They should follow such a one rather than the evil man,
Diotrophes, among them.
83
A. In his conclusion, John speaks of the fact that he is planning a visit to them
shortly. This means that he is writing from a place not too far away and is in a
position to come and deal with the problem that they have as well as to
encourage them in their stand for the Lord. Vs. 13, 14
1. This reminds us of Paul’s own intention to come and visit the Corinthians
(SEE: II Corinthians 12:20-13:3) shortly after the writing of that epistle. Paul
also had the same purposes in his heart for visiting them that John expresses in
these two verses, vs. 13, 14.
2. Both John and Paul were in positions of great authority as Apostles, If the
problems the churches they wrote to were not straightened out and the
members of the congregations walking obediently and correctly before the Lord
when they arrived, they would have the authority to take strong action when
they would be among these believers. This action was what they intended, if
necessary. Their warnings of their coming would be a means of the believers
examining their own individual hearts to see where they stood with the Lord.
SEE: II Corinthians 13:5, 6.
b. We note that many of Paul’s benedictions are very brief, where he simply
fervently hopes that the PEACE of the Lord may be with them, but all of them
carry with them his love and tender care for them and his deep desire that they
would faithfully be obedient to the teachings they have received through him
from the Lord.
2. This closing benediction of John follows the pattern of the brief words that
Paul had used several times, when John desires that God’s PEACE should be
with them. This PEACE is not “peace WITH God” that is necessary in
salvation, but is “the peace OF God” (SEE: Philippians 4, 6, 7) that God gives
to Christians who are in right relationship with Him and walking in complete
trust in His presence and guidance in their lives in all circumstances. Though
he has had to speak strongly to them, he has still written with deep love and
concern for them in his heart.
84
3. Some have wondered why this particular benediction is used in this epistle of
John but not in the first two that he wrote.
a. Since this epistle is addressed to a church leader, it could well be that this
prayer for PEACE for them is especially centered on Gaius himself who might
personally be very discouraged and lacking in peace of heart because of the sin
in the church. John could be saying to him that, no matter how difficult the
circumstances might be that he faces as a pastor, the Lord can still give him
daily peace and contentment in his service for God.
b. We note Paul’s own testimony concerning his sharing of the Lord’s PEACE
and contentment in the worst of circumstances. SEE: Philippians 4:10-13,
where Paul was in prison under very difficult circumstances, was somewhat
shut off from the friends and fellow workers that he had been able to freely see
when he had lived in a hired house in Rome (SEE: Acts 28:30, 31) and had
had his circumstances made even worse by the critical preaching against him
of some of the brethren. SEE: Philippians 1:13-18.
c. In John’s own life, as we see his attitude toward his own situation and life in
these three epistle, it seems that he enjoys perfect peace in the Lord in spite of
some of the difficulties that he himself might be going through. It seems,
therefore, that John’s own peace of heart in his circumstances would be a
worthy example to a church leader such as Gaius.
C. He closes this epistle with greetings from “the friends.” He does not name
these “friends”, but it seems that they would be known to Gaius and perhaps
their names were not necessary. The friends he refers to in the church itself
whom Gaius is to greet would be the faithful ones who have not followed the
evil man and his followers.
INTRODUCTION
85
THE AUTHOR OF THE EPISTLE OF JUDE
1. We do not hear anything about Jude in the Book of Acts or in any of the epistles
of Paul and others in the New Testament, but he is spoken of by name in the
Gospels as a brother of the Lord. SEE: Matthew 13:55; Mark 6:3.
2. In the Gospels he is introduced as a son of Mary the mother of Jesus. This means
that he, together with three others, was one of the half brothers of Jesus. It is
written that there were four half-brothers, whose names were given, and at least
two half sisters of Jesus born to Mary after the birth of the Lord (SEE: Matthew
13:54-56; Mark 6:3). James, a leader in the Jerusalem Church and one of the
writers of the New Testament, was also one of these.
3. As was true with James, it seems likely that he was not converted until after the
resurrection of the Lord. During the lifetime of the Lord he seems to have been a
doubter (SEE: John 7:3-8) and may even have been among those brothers who
came with Mary to take Jesus away because they thought that he might have
been deranged (SEE: Mark 3:20-22). Jesus had to rebuff them on another
occasion when they came with Mary to see him (SEE: Matthew 12:46-50; Mark
3:31-35). They also seemed to mock him and his ministry (SEE: John 7:1-8)
4. It seems likely that both he and James, his brother, were among the 120
followers of the Lord mentioned in Acts, chapter 1. They may have been
converted in the post-resurrection period. Whether he ever became a main
leader in the Jerusalem Church we do not know. He was respected enough,
however, that God chose him to write this Epistle of Jude.
1. Though he was part of the Jerusalem Church and probably had no major
ministry of his own outside of Jerusalem, if this epistle was written after the fall
of Jerusalem, as many believe, then it would have been addressed to believers,
both Jew and Gentile, in other parts of Asia.
2. We do not know the exact destination of this epistle, for its contents deal
with problems in every part of Asia affecting the churches in this later period of
time. If we knew his own location at this time, we might know his addressees.
Since Jerusalem had been destroyed in 70 A.D., it seems sure he was not there.
THE THEME AND PURPOSE OF THE EPISTLE OF JUDE
1. Dr. Tenney notes that a comparison of the contents of the Epistle of Jude with
the second and third chapters of II Peter seems to indicate that there was some
connection between these two books. This does not mean that their epistles were
86
written at the same time, but it does indicate that Jude deeply respected Peter
and the other apostles and followed their teaching faithfully. He may even have
had access to II Peter so that he was familiar with its contents and God inspired
him to include the warnings Peter had given also in his own inspired epistle.
a. In vs. 3, 4, he seems to issue the same warning that Peter had given concerning
those who have come into the churches from the outside with false teaching.
SEE: II Peter 2:1-19.
b. In vs. 17, 18, he quotes directly from II Peter 3:3 and attributes this quote to
the “apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ” and the warnings they had given
concerning the danger of the coming of false teachers.
2. Jude himself states that his main purpose in writing was to urge his readers “to
contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all delivered unto the saints.”
3. The churches had other needs at that time, but their main need was to guard
themselves against the false teaching which characterized this latter part of the
first century. If that false teaching had been permitted to prevail, then the
churches could have been totally spiritually corrupted and the work of
spreading and following the Gospel could have been destroyed.
1. Because the contents of this epistle seem to indicate that he had a close
connection, in writing this epistle, with Peter, some have believed that he
might have written it before Peter died in about 66 A.D. However, it seems
more likely that he had seen the contents of Peter’s epistles AFTER Peter had
died, and that he had been affected by them.
2. Most Bible teachers believe, therefore, that he wrote his epistle as late as 80
A.D., in the period of time after the fall of Jerusalem. This means that he was
active and writing in the same period of time when John wrote the Gospel of
John and his three epistles.
3. We do not know when he died. It seems from history that, in the period from 90-
95 A.D., only John the Apostle was still living, so Jude may have died shortly
after writing his epistle.
4. There is also no clear evidence that he was ever imprisoned by the Romans and
died in their custody. Such imprisonment is possible, but Jude seems to give no
hint at all of it in his epistle and he did not go down in history as a martyr.
87
DEALING WITH THE CRISIS OF APOSTASY
I. SALUTATION Jude, 1, 2
I. SALUTATION Jude, 1, 2
1. His brother James had also used this title of being a bond-servant or slave of
the Lord. This was a title that Paul had also used frequently in such epistles as
Romans 1:1; Philippians 1:1; Titus 1:1 and Philemon, vs. 1. In Philemon, vs.
1, Paul altered this introduction slightly by using the phrase “A PRISONER of
Jesus Christ,” which could refer to his actual imprisonment in Rome but which
carries the far broader emphasis that it is FOR THE SAKE OF Jesus Christ,
under whose authority he is completely submissive, that he is there.
2. Neither he nor his brother James had the position or authority of being
APOSTLES, but James is the most frequently named leader of the Jerusalem
Church, and it seems likely that Jude also occupied some important post in the
Jerusalem Church. Therefore, he would be both well known and respected by
those to whom he is writing, and they would be willing to accept the fact that
God had chosen to inspire him by the Holy Spirit to write this epistle. Such
acceptance would be essential if these teachings are to be believed and followed.
3. Because of his family relationship with the Lord and the position he most likely
occupied in the Jerusalem Church, he can write with authority as God inspires
him by the Holy Spirit to pen these admonitions and instructions to his readers.
He therefore does not need to defend his right to be so used by God to write an
epistle to these readers. They would accept his authority without question.
88
B. The addressees of this epistle are not easy to exactly identify. Vs. 1b
1. Jude had spent the early part of his life in his home country of Galilee, and
then, after the Church Age began in 30 A.D. and until the destruction of
Jerusalem in 70 A.D., in Jerusalem itself working with a Jewish church for the
next 40 years. He was not known as an evangelist and so perhaps did not leave
Jerusalem during the dispersion of the Christians because of persecution in
Acts, chapter 8.
2. However, whereas James had written specifically to the Jews of the dispersion,
the contents of Jude’s epistle seems to be broader in nature and would include
both Jews and Gentiles. There are those who believe that his addressees are
those residing on the eastern side of Asia rather than throughout the Asian
area. This seems likely since there is no evidence that he traveled widely so that
he would be known all over Asia.
3) Some versions (e.g. NASB) include the phrase “BELOVED IN GOD THE
FATHER,” which would emphasize the full extent of God’s love for us in
saving us, and the tenderness of His relationship with us as we walk in our
salvation. Many question whether this phrase was in the original epistle that
Jude wrote, but its truth is certainly something that is very dear to us as we
walk daily with Him in salvation.
89
1) This phrase refers to the SECUURITY of our eternal relationship with the
Lord in salvation once we have truly come into relationship with Him through
repentance and heart faith in Him as our Savior from sin.
2) We see this taught by the Lord Himself in John 10:28-30, where He speaks of
those who are His sheep and the impossibility of them ever losing that
relationship with Him by being taken out of either His hand or the Father’s
hand. In His earlier conversation with Nicodemus (SEE: John 3:1-21), the
Lord had emphasized that Nicodemus could only be saved by faith in HIM
and not through any of the works that he had accumulated and depended on.
3) We see this again in such passages as Ephesians 1:14; 4:30 where the finality
and eternal nature of our salvation is assured through the regenerating and
SEALING work of the Holy Spirit.
4) This preservation in the Lord emphasizes the truth that we are altogether
saved by the Grace of God through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ entirely
apart from any works or merit of our own.
a) Neither BEFORE we were saved did our good works bring merit to us so that
we could GAIN our salvation, nor AFTER we are saved can we KEEP IT
through good works or merit of our own.
b) Rather than such assurance being a license to sin, as some claim, those who do
not live according to His will and standards of holiness in their Christian lives
after they have been saved will face the JUDGEMENT SEAT OF CHRIST
(SEE: I Corinthians 3:10-15; II Corinthians 5:9-11) BUT will never stand
before the GREAT WHITE THRONE of God in the final judgment of the
Lost. SEE: Revelation 20:11-15.
1. This opening blessing for the readers is very similar to the one that Paul used to
open most of his epistles. SEE: Romans 1:7; I Corinthians 1:3; II Corinthians
1:2; Galatians 1:3; Ephesians 1:2; Philippians 1:2; Colossians 1:2; I
Thessalonians 1:1; II Thessalonians 1:2; I Timothy 1:2; II Timothy 1:2; Titus
1:4; and Philemon, vs. 3.
2. This could have been a very common greeting that Christians gave each other
when they would meet, and Jude is led by God to include it in his epistle. Also,
he could have been familiar with some of Paul’s writings where it was used,
and the Lord led him to include this also in his epistle.
90
a. MERCY. They gave already experienced the MERCY AND GRACE OF
GOD in salvation, but now need His daily strength in their lives in living
their Christian lives and facing the hardships and difficulties that Christians
faced in that day. We see the promise of this, for instance, when Paul had a
great physical difficulty in his life that was a great trial to Him. SEE: II
Corinthians 12:7-10. God would not remove this problem from him, but
promised him the GRACE/STRENGTH to go through life with it.
b. PEACE. This phrase is used in three different ways in the New Testament. In
SALVATION, they already have peace WITH God (SEE: Romans 5:1), but
they have an ONGOING PERSONAL NEED in their lives for the peace OF
God (SEE: Philippians 4:6, 7) which would be that continual quietness of heart
and freedom from worries and fears that God gives to His people as they live
their Christian lives, even in the worst of circumstances. He uses it in a third
way in Romans 12:18, when he commands them to have peace in their
relationships WITH OTHERS, both Christians and non-Christians. In this
passage, he seems to be applying this phrase to the daily strength they need in
living the Christian life and facing the difficulties of life.
c. LOVE. Again, they have already experienced the love of God in their salvation
(SEE: John 3:16; Ephesians 1:4c, 5), but God also continues to pour out His
love upon Christians as they live their Christian lives, as we experience His
continual blessing and favor upon our lives. SEE: Galatians 5:22; Ephesians
1:3-14; 5:29.
A. Originally, Jude had had a burden to share with them about their “common
salvation” (SEE: Titus 1:4), the one that is based on a fixed set of Truth and is
shared by all true believers, but now he is especially burdened because of the
rise of so much false teaching in that day.
1. If that false teaching, which has gotten in among them, would not be strongly
opposed and rooted out from among them, they would leave the fixed Truths of
their “common salvation” and depart into teaching that would deny that very
“common salvation” in favor of a false set of teachings that would give them no
hope or true foundations on which to stand. Therefore, strong action must be
taken and the problem must be taken care of.
2. Therefore, Jude, rather than elaborating on their salvation itself and their
responsibilities toward God in living their Christian lives, which is the pattern,
except for Galatians, of most of the epistles of Paul, is led to direct his
instructions to dealing with this urgent need and danger they were facing,
brought on by the clever teachings of the abundance of these false teachers.
91
B. We note that, except for James (written very early in the Church Age, 45 A.D.),
all of the other General Epistles, written either in the late 60’s or after the
destruction if Jerusalem in 70 A.D., also put great emphasis upon the rise of the
false teachers and the threat they are to the Truth that God has revealed.
1. As noted, all of the other General Epistles, were written in that period of time in
the late 70’s and 80’s following the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans.
Because they were under persecution from the Romans rather than from the
Jews, the Christians were under great stress and might look for new ideas and
approaches to their faith to encourage them and help them through these times.
2. As noted in the study of some of the other epistles in this set of the General
Epistles, it is a NEW GENERATION OF CHRISTIANS who are now
responsible for carrying on the “faith once delivered unto the saints.”
a. Whether they were Jews or Gentiles, few of that new generation had ever
actually seen the Lord in the flesh or had directly sat under His teachings.
b. Their knowledge of the overall Person and Work of the Lord came only from
the writings and teachings of the Apostles and early followers of the Lord,
whose witness they might be tempted to question at times because of the
astounding nature of the Truth in included.
1) Their questioning of these writings and teachings might come because of the
human difficulty they would have in accepting as truth all of His miracles, the
claims He made about himself and even the purpose and results of His death
on the Cross.
2) His Deity would also be a stumbling block to them from an intellectual point
of view. This Truth would be something that, though difficult to completely
explain, would require strong faith.
c. As is also true today with the new generations, false teachers would find a
fertile field in which to plow and plant their devilish teachings, and would find
many who were looking for something more modern and exciting to follow
than the old ways and the eternal Truth. These would willingly follow them.
d. Such followers would feel that they still were following the Truth as defined
for them by these false teachers, but actually they would have departed from
it, even when their deviation from it would seem very slight. SEE: Galatians
1:6-9, where the Judaizers had cleverly led the Galatians astray.
92
C. Before he even identifies the nature of the false teaching, he challenges them to
be willing to take a strong stand for “the FAITH which was once delivered unto
the saints.”
1. The phrase “FAITH” that he uses here is not referring to the personal trust
that we put in the Lord Jesus Christ as our Savior, or even the faith that we
have in the daily Christian life to trust God to meet our daily needs and to
walk close to Him, but it is referring to that SET OF TRUTH that God has
given to us that is the only basis/foundation for our salvation, our daily walk
before Him and our correct understanding of His will and purposes for our
own lives and for the world itself.
2. That SET OF TRUTH will not make our decisions for us or replace our own
responsibilities in walking in separation from the world of sin and daily living
for Him, but it is the only basis for our lives in any of these areas and must be
defended.
3. There were probably many so-called “Christian leaders” in that day, from this
new generation, who would resent and teach against anyone taking such a
strong absolute and unchanging stand for the Truth, and might even label such
poople “arrogant” and “divisive” when strong holders of the Faith would even
be willing to separate from those who were not willing to take such a strong
stand. The same would be true today as many in the “EVANGELICAL” realm
resent and even despise strong and outspoken “FUNDAMENTALISTS” who
take such a stand.
4. We accept that a strong stand for the Faith, as commanded in Jude, must be
taken in love and without any bitterness or hatred on our part, so that nothing
in our MANNER of taking such a stand would detract from the spiritual
responsibility we have for that stand and the results that we hope to gain.
a. Our MANNER must meet God’s own standards, for a wrong MANNER of
taking such a stand would meet His judgment. SEE: Paul’s loving but
forceful stand for the faith in such epistles as II Corinthians, Galatians and I
and II Thessalonians. SEE: I Thessalonians 1:5b; 2:1-12.
b. There is danger that such a stand might be taken on the basis of PRIDE,
SELF EXALTATION or REPUTATION BUILDING rather than being taken
for pure reasons that would be approved by God. If any of those three factors
enter into our taking such a stand, then we are rightly judged to be wrong and
have not brought the cause of Christ any benefit by the stand we have taken.
5. As suggested, such a strong stand, lovingly and rightly taken, might have to lead
to total separation in fellowship and labor from those who themselves may still
believe the Truth but who will not take such a stand, and who willingly walk
with those who have departed from “THE FAITH” or compromise it in one
93
way or another. In America, the Philippines and other countries, some of the
most spiritual and most influential movements on behalf of THE FAITH have
had to carried out with such separation, and God has blest those steps of
separation.
6. Though some do not like the use of this term, the term “CONTEND”/ FIGHT
for the FAITH is an important part of this challenge. This is the idea that we
are not only to personally believe and follow such a stand, but we are also to
SPEAK on behalf of this stand and deal with those who are not willing to take
it. Such a strong stand leading also to possible separation from others will most
often be misinterpreted and resented by many, but, as stated before, providing
it meets God’s standards for the MANNER in which we do it, God will be
pleased with it. That approval of God is what must count most with us.
E. The false teachers, who were actually part of their assemblies (“crept in
unawares”), were seeking to lead people astray in two areas. Vs. 4
1. First, they were seeking to change or deny altogether that set of Truth that
God had once for given to His people to believe and follow. Their main attack
on that Truth, as pointed out earlier, centered on the Person and Work of the
Lord Jesus Christ, although other areas of this set of Truth had also come
under their attacks. If they could successfully deny and lead others astray
concerning this central Truth about the Lord, then the rest of the Truth would
become meaningless to those who would be led astray.
2. Second, they were attacking the strict standards of holiness and separation
from the world that God had given for His people to follow in their
relationship with the Lord. The two themes are related. If they were to follow
the teaching of these false teachers, leaving the Truth would open the door for
Christians to feel justified in living freely in any vile sins they might choose.
SEE: Romans 5:20 and 6:1-8; 14:1-15:7; I Corinthians, chapters 8-10;
Galatians 5:1-13; 16-26.
A. THE FIRST PURPOSE of this section is to show these believers that false
teaching concerning true FAITH and PRACTICE has always been present
whenever God’s people have sought to obey the Truth and please God.
94
1. He uses a number of HISTORICAL EXAMPLES to illustrate this point. We
note that, in these verses, he uses exactly the examples that Peter had used in II
Peter, chapter 2, and draws the same conclusions concerning them, indicating
that God may have given Jude access to Peter’s final epistle and then inspired
him to adapt these examples to his own challenge for this church.
1) In the wilderness journey, when God had delivered them from Egypt and sent
them on their way to their “promised land”, the people of Israel rebelled
many times against God.
a) Some of these rebellions involved discontent with THE WAY God was
leading them and providing for their needs. SEE: Exodus, chapter 17, when
they lacked water; and Numbers, chapter 11;1-9, when they remembered the
food of Egypt and despised the food God was giving them.
c) Some of these rebellions involved complete departure from God and their
worship of Him, and a turning aside into the most pagan kind of idol worship.
SEE: Exodus, chapters 32, and 33.
2) In no case had God failed them. He had perfectly kept His promises to them
and had prepared a wonderful future for them, as His people, in their own
land under His care. He would, without fail, perfectly meet all their needs and
they would never need to fear their enemies, for, in His power, he would
defeat all of them.
b) In the light of all the benefits they had in belonging to Him and having that
special relationship with Him as HIS PEOPLE, these conditions should have
been no problem to them and they should have completely devoted their lives
to following them without question or complaint.
c) They also knew the penalties for breaking these conditions God had laid
down for them, and turning away from Him.
95
3) Throughout their history, once they had settled in the “promised land”, the
people of Israel continued to rebel against Him. Not only the people but also
their leaders were involved in these rebellions. SEE: The period of the
Judges; Saul’s rebellion in I Samuel, chapters 13, 15; Solomon’s rebellions in
I Kings 11:1-8; the rebellions of the northern Kingdom of Israel, beginning
with Jeroboam in I Kings, chapter 12, leading to their captivity under Assyria
in 722 B.C.; and the final rebellions of the southern Kingdom of Judah in II
Kings, leading to their captivity under Babylon and Persia, beginning in 606
B.C..
1) We note that the purpose of the existence of angels was that they might serve
God in heaven and earth and carry out His purposes in this service for Him.
Had some of them not rebelled, this service for God for the entire angelic host
could have continued.
2) Before the Creation of the world and all that in them is, some of the angelic
beings, led by Satan/Lucifer himself, rebelled against God. They sought to
take away His authority over them and even to exalt themselves to His own
level and beyond. Many believe that this is also taught in such passages as
Isaiah 14:12-15 and II Peter 2:4, with Babylon as the example in Isaiah 14 of
how Satan himself thought of his importance and sought to exalt himself.
3) These angelic beings, after they were cast out of heaven, began their evil work
on the earth with the first man Adam, and have worked through all the ages
since to try to defeat the purposes of God for mankind and to hinder the
relationship of mankind with God.
4) Until their final judgment and eternal punishment by God, they will continue
to work in the world to enslave mankind in sin and keep them from coming to
God. Satan even sought to tempt the Lord Himself, (SEE: Matthew 4:1-11)
and his temptations are continually facing us, even in the Christian life
5) Their freedom now to work in the world does not take away from the absolute
control that God has over the affairs of men. Rather it speaks of God working
out his own timing in their final judgment and condemnation.
1) In the time of Abraham, these were the wickedest cities in the world,
indulging in every possible type of moral sins known to mankind. They were
so wicked that Abraham refused to accept the easier living conditions that the
Jordan River Valley would have afforded him, and chose instead to remain in
the central areas of Canaan when he was given the choice. SEE: Genesis 13:9.
96
2) We note that LOT was tempted by these cities (and their sins?) when he
parted from Abraham. He not only chose the Jordan River Valley in which to
settle, but he also chose to enter Sodom and live there with his family. His
children were also affected by the sins of those two cities. Though the New
Testament speaks of him as “righteous Lot” and “that righteous man” in II
Peter 2:7-9, Lot was still wrong in the steps he took and in his involvement in
the life of that wicked city.
B. THE SECOND PUROSE of this section is to point out to them that the
judgment of God always falls on those who are involved in this false teaching,
though such people may feel very secure and arrogant in going ahead with
leading others astray, as though God does not care.
1. In each of the three illustrations he uses from HISTORY, the judgment of God
was their reward for their wickedness. SEE ALSO: II Peter 2:4-8.
a. God, in His great love and compassion for them, only tolerated the rebellions
and waywardness of the PEOPLE OF ISRAEL for hundreds of years before
before He brought upon them His judgment. In His love for them He chose to
plead with them over several centuries before He finally determined, after the
sins of King Manasseh that he would permit even Judah to be led away
captive.
1) At first, His judgment on them consisted of plagues and other calamities that
sometimes destroyed great numbers of people each time to warn them and
bring them back into right relationship with Him. For a time they would be
warned by these, would respond and would obey Him.
2) When they built the GOLDEN CALF in Exodus 32, he considered destroying
the entire nation and beginning afresh with Moses, but this judgment of God
was not carried through after the fervent prayers of Moses (SEE: Exodus
32:11-13) in that chapter. At that time, He also considered letting them go on
with success into the promised land, but would remove His Presence from
them. Again, Moses intervened in prayer. SEE: Exodus, chapter 33:12, 13.
3) When they finally rebelled at the time of the sending of the spies, (SEE:
Numbers 13), in spite of the prayer of Moses on their behalf (SEE: Numbers
14:13-19) God judged them more strongly and caused them to wander in the
wilderness until a full forty years had passed and that generation had
completely passed away. SEE: Numbers 14:20-24. Again, He had considered
destroying them completely and beginning again with Moses (SEE: Numbers
14:1l, 12) but then changed to the judgment of causing that older generation
to wander in the wilderness until they died.
97
4) In the time of the Judges, God did permit their enemies to rule over them, but
then always delivered them and restored His blessing to them by raising up
wise judges to rule over them.
5) Throughout the history that followed the Judges, they went through one
rebellion after another until God finally sent both the northern Kingdom of
Israel (722 B.C.) and the southern Kingdom of Judah into captivity (606 and
586 B.C.). This was like a final judgment on the nation of Israel.
6) In every case, the judgments they received were fully deserved, and the
reputation and holiness of God was upheld as an example and warning to all
future generations. In no case, could the compassion and love of the Lord for
them be called into question. Rather, the judgments He permitted were for
the purpose of teaching them and bringing them into a true relationship with
Him.
b. In the case of the REBELLIOUS ANGELS who are led by Satan himself, God
first cast them out of heaven so that they would have no more relationship with
Him. Then, He will finally judge them at the final judgment (SEE: Revelation
20:10-15) when Satan and his followers (SEE: Jude, vs. 6b) and all of the
unsaved of all the ages will be judged and cast into hell. It is true that He is
permitting them to practice their evil here on the earth at this time, but they
know that their end will finally come and His judgment on them will be
accomplished.
2. His emphasis is clear that God’s judgment will also be upon those involved in
the false teaching in the churches of that day, and upon all of those of the entire
New Testament Age who teach or follow false teaching either within or outside
the assemblies of believers. The teachers and their followers in the CULT
GROUPS OF TODAY, for instance, will be among those whose judgment from
God will surely come because of their departures from the Truth and their
devilish and zealous efforts, with complete dedication to their false teachings
and to their task of enlisting others to follow them.
A. In the first section of this passage, he speaks of the extreme pride and
arrogance of these false teachers as they try to assert their authority even over
angelic beings. Their purpose seems to be to impress upon those they are
seeking to lead astray that they are people of great power and authority in
98
spiritual realms and that this power and authority has come to them from God
in dreams and visions. Therefore, their evil teachings must also have come from
God and are to be accepted. Vs. 8-13
1. This proud and arrogant stand they take defies spiritual authorities in the
church and even God Himself, but they are arrogant enough not to be
concerned about this or the judgment of God that will surely come upon them.
2. Like Balaam, Korah and others, they are doing this for both material gain and
attainment of personal standing of leadership and power before others. As they
gather around them those they have deceived, this power and authority
increases to their own glory and earns the praise of men who follow them.
3. In describing these false and evil teachers, he not only compares them to the
worst animals and the worst possible situations in life, but he also warns these
true believers that these men are participating arrogantly with them in the most
sacred things in the church such as their “love feasts” (the Lord’s Table?)
4. Since these evil men are working AMONG them in the assemblies of believers,
they are both to be recognized for what they are and strongly dealt with by
those who follow the Truth. It is those who deeply care about the Truth itself,
the purity of their assemblies and the sacredness before God of their gathering
together who will have to do something about them.
B. He quotes from ENOCH, from the “seventh (generation) from Adam”, who
predicted the rise of these false teachers and their judgment by God. Vs. 14, 15
1. We do not know where he found this teaching in the writings of that day, since
it is not in the text of the Old Testament itself, but God, in inspiring him to
write, has directed him to record it for these believers to whom he is writing. It
is therefore a reliable quotation.
2. The main emphasis of this quotation is that, no matter how secure these false
teachers might feel in their evil teachings in opposition to God and His Truth,
the full judgment of God will finally come upon them. At that time, the full
extent of all they have done will be revealed and dealt with by God in this
judgment. Their followers will also be judged by God. This warns even those
who are simply being tempted by their teachings that they dare not go any
farther in listening to them.
C. He closes this section with a final description of these evil teachers. As they
attend the assembly and seek to lead astray those who are following the Lord,
they manifest every kind of evil conduct. This proves that they have no
relationship with God in salvation and are to be rejected as members of the
assembly.
99
V. ADVICE FOR GUARDING THEMSELVES Jude, 17-23
A. This is a section dealing with how these true believers and followers of the
Truth of God can spiritually protect themselves and maintain the approval and
blessing of God upon their lives. Unless they spiritually approach this matter of
the false and evil teachers with the right approach, they too might fall prey to
their teaching. SEE ALSO: I Timothy 6:20, 21.
B. He gives them two clear instructions that they are follow in guarding
themselves.
a. These false teachers would surely come in every period of time and generation,
and their coming should be expected as a grave danger to the church. As the
history of that lst Century records, churches that might have been following
the Truth faithfully at a certain time could be led astray and fail through these
evil teachers at another time.
1) SEE: Revelation 2:14, 15, where the Church at Pergamus, once a sound and a
pure church, has permitted false teachers to come in and deceive the people.
2) SEE: Revelation 2:19-24, where the Church at Thyatira is commended for the
good things that have characterized that church in THE PAST, but now they
have tolerated the woman named Jezebel who is leading them into every kind
of false teaching. This seems to be an illustration of how evil these false
teachers are rather than speaking of a literal woman leading them astray.
c. Still in the early days of the Church, even the Church at Corinth, a church that
had been established by Paul in about 51 A.D and was a church that had been
thoroughly taught and guarded by three of God’s servants thereafter, men
who were still living, had to be strongly warned about those in the church who
100
were denying the resurrection of the believers at the coming of the Lord. SEE:
I Corinthians 15:12.
d. Therefore, these true believers and followers of the Truth, living in the latter
days of that first century, are not to take these false teachers for granted but
are to be alert and active in taking a stand for the Truth and against those who
deny it. SEE: Jude, vs. 3b.
2. They are not just to believe the Truth that God has given, “the FAITH once for
all delivered to the saints,” but they are to be BUILT UP IN THAT FAITH so
that they are spiritual enough both to follow it and defend it. Vs. 20-23
a. We know from the teaching of the Lord himself that maintaining a right
relationship with the Lord and growing in Him is essential in living a spiritual
life and having victory over the temptations and false teachings being faced.
Unless they are in the right relationship with the Lord in their daily lives
(SEE: John 15:1-10-16), such victory over sin and false teaching will not come.
b. In this passage, he lists four essentials in their walk with the Lord. These will
help protect them against the evils of their day. Vs. 20, 21
3) They are to keep themselves in the LOVE OF GOD. This could be interpreted
as teaching that, as they have been saved through the mercy and grace of God
in pouring out His love upon them, they are to constantly walk in that love
and be completely dependent upon it in their Christian lives even as they were
in their salvation. Whether in salvation or in their Christian lives, they accept
that they are completely dependent upon the mercy and grace of God
bestowed in His love.
4) They are to wait expectantly/with deep desire for the eternal life that the
Lord Jesus Christ has given them. This could refer to the fact that they do not
need to fear death if the eternal life they have through Christ is completely
real to them and has become a high priority in their lives. Some feel that it
could also refer to the Coming of the Lord.
3. As they follow these instructions for being BUILT UP in their own Christian
lives, as they believe and follow the FAITH that God has given, they are also to
101
encourage and assist others who might be tempted or who are actually in
danger from the false teachers that have come. Vs. 22, 23
a. First, they are to show care and great compassion for some who may have
DOUBTS. Such people need stronger Christians to come along side them and
help them. SEE ALSO: Romans 15:1; Galatians 6:1. This encouraging and
helping of weaker brothers is often taught and is one of the major
responsibilities of stronger Christians. In the teaching of this epistle, our love
and compassion may keep them from falling into the errors of those false
teachers.
b. Second, they are to take drastic steps to RESCUE others that may already
have fallen into the trap of listening to the false teachers and are in grave
danger of going farther with these evil teachings. He speaks of “PULLING
THEM OUT OF THE FIRE.” We cannot force them to remain in the Truth or
to reject the false teachers, but we can take every step possible to help them see
the grave danger they are facing and to escape from it.
A. Though only four of the General Epistles close with a benediction, I and II
Peter, III John and Jude, many of the other epistles of the New Testament
include one or more of them in the final chapters. SEE: Romans 16:20, 24, 25-
27; I Corinthians 16:28, 34; II Corinthians 13:14; Galatians 6:18; Ephesians
6:23, 24; Philippians 4:23; I Thessalonians 3:11-13; 5:23, 28; II Thessalonians
3:5, 16; Hebrews 13:25; I Peter 5:14b; II Peter 318b; III John, vs. 15a; Jude, vs.
24, 25.
B. There were two MAIN PURPOSES for these closing benedictions in the
epistles.
1. The main purpose for these benedictions, in spite of the problems the writer
has had to deal with in the text of each epistle (SEE: I and II Corinthians), was
to assure the readers of the LOVING CONCERN the writer had for them, and
his deep burden and prayer that they would correct the problems in which they
were involved and go on victoriously with the Lord. This loving concern was the
greatest motivation in his life in writing to them rather than anger or bitterness.
2. Another important purpose was to exalt the Lord and His place and authority
in their lives. We see this especially in Jude, vs. 24, 25, where the entire
benediction is one of exaltation and praise for the PERSON AND
CHARACTER of God. The readers needed this type of benediction, for the
problems in Jude meant that many of them lacked true respect for God and
had abandoned His Truth in favor of the false teachings of the evil men who
had come among them.
102
C. WE NOTE THE CONTENTS OF THIS BENEDICTION.
1. The first part, vs. 24, exalts the POWER AND ABILITY OF GOD to keep them
from falling into the errors with which they are faced, and to enable them to be
able to stand before God blameless, unashamed (SEE: I Corinthians 3:11-15;
9:27) and joyful in Him.
a. We know that it is by the indwelling Holy Spirit of God that we are kept and
empowered to overcome evil teachings and actions, and to live our lives to the
glory of God. SEE: John 14:16, 17; Romans, chapter 8; Galatians 5:16.
b. We note, however, that the Epistle of Jude is emphasizing that the help of God
in our lives is not a substitute for our own responsibility before God to resist
and turn away from evil teachings and actions that come before us.
c. The promise in vs. 24 does not contradict this. Rather, the emphasis of vs. 24 is
upon the fact that, even when we have assumed full responsibility for our own
response to the teachings and standards God has set before us, we cannot have
victory by our own efforts. It is only through the help of the Spirit that the
victory can come. SEE: Romans 7:7-25, where the man was in total defeat in
his own strength in spite of his sincere efforts and commitment to victory.
a. The emphasis upon this is necessary to cause us to take God seriously in our
lives, to live in His FEAR and in complete submission to Him and to follow
Him and His Truth to the very end no matter what others might teach or do.
b. From the contents of this benediction we can see that it is important to not just
receive teaching and to be commanded to follow it faithfully. If this is our only
motivation in following the teaching we receive, in dire circumstances or when
others are not faithful to it we will be tempted to either compromise it or give
it up altogether. Several things must accompany this teaching if we are going
to commit our lives to it and take a stand on it no matter what circumstances
we might go through or how others might react to it in their own lives.
1) We recognize that these teachings and standards and teachings come from the
Almighty God Himself and are not the works of men. Therefore, these
teachings and standards carry with them the AUTHORITY AND WILL of
God Himself. To ignore or disobey them makes us subject to His judgment
and its consequences. Therefore, we dare not ignore, change or abandon
them.
103
2) We also recognize the worthiness of the Almighty God to be followed and
absolutely obeyed. No one else has this place of respect and honor in our lives,
and so we would never doubt that we can completely trust Him with our lives
and with all that we have and are before Him.
c. Even with all of this being true, there is no guarantee that we will actually
submit our lives to the Almighty God and devote ourselves completely to
following and obeying Him and the teachings of His Word.
1) We note how Israel could so easily turn aside from Him in their wilderness
experience no matter how He revealed Himself or what He did for them.
SEE: Exodus, chapters 18-34, when Israel was camped around Mt. Sinai and
the PRESENCE AND GLORY OF GOD was on the mountain in their view.
It was in this setting that they turned their backs on God and made the
golden calf in Exodus, chapter 32. No wonder God wanted to completely
destroy the nation and begin again with Moses. SEE: Exodus 32:9, 10.
2) We see in JUDE and also in the churches of today, how God’s people could so
easily turn their hearts and lives away from Him and follow their own evil
teachings and ways.
a) Even after many years of being saved, many Christians show little growth in
their spiritual lives in their relationship with the Lord Jesus Christ and in
their “growth and knowledge” of Him. SEE: II Peter 3:18.
b) As weak and untaught Christians, evidencing little desire to read and study
the Word of God themselves, this leaves them open to strange teachings and
practices to which they can easily yield their lives.
c. Therefore, from the study of Jude, it is clear that neither the PERSON OF
GOD nor the TRUTH OF GOD will change. God has once for all completed
and set apart His Word as the final and only authoritative statement of His
Truth. It may neither be added to or taken away from. SEE: Revelation
22:18, 19.
d. Who would seek to either deny or change any part of God’s Word is not
opposing man but is opposing God himself.
104
1) We can choose to remain completely true to them, living by them and
defending them against those who seek to deny or change them, There will be
a price to pay for taking such a strong stand for the faith. While God Himself
will approve of what we do and pour out His blessing and favor upon us in
this stand for His Truth, the world around us, including some who claim to
name the Name of the Lord and be His followers, will resent that stand and
will make every effort to destroy our reputation.
a) While we ourselves might still privately hold fast to His Truth and base our
own personal faith and lives upon it, we would say nothing about those who
deny or change it, and would refuse to join in in any disciplinary action
against them if they are part of the assembly of believers. This would permit
the false teachers to have their own way in leading others astray.
b) Such a tolerant attitude would even win the friendship and respect of these
false teachers for such a “tolerant and loving” attitude toward them and
their denial of the faith. However, we would win the disapproval of God and
would incur His judgment for our failure to hold fast to His Word, whatever
form that judgment might take.
STUDIES IN THE GENERAL EPISTLES
COURSE TEXTBOOK:
The only textbook for the course will be the Bible itself. Through the required and
careful reading of each of the General Epistles, the section by section examination of
the teachings of each epistle, both in personal study and in class study, and the help
of the Holy Spirit in understanding what is read and taught, the students can gain a
clear understanding of the teachings of each of the epistles.
It is to be noted that only the King James Version of the Bible will be permitted and
used in class study. Students, in their own personal study of these epistles, may
consult other more modern versions of the Scriptures (e.g. NASB, NIV, etc) in
English (or even versions of the Scriptures in the Greek language) to more clearly
understand the language and phrases found in the KGV that are difficult to
understand or are no longer in use in the English language today.
Class materials may be distributed in class from time to time to supplement the
notes taken by the students themselves. These may provide additional background
information on the text of Scripture under consideration at any one time.
105
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
The weekly class study in the course will be a verse by verse study of each epistle,
and will follow the detailed outline of each epistle as taught at the beginning of the
study of that epistle. It is noted that sometimes the detailed outline of an epistle may
be adapted from a suggested outline by Dr. Merrill Tenney in his book NEW
TESTAMENT SURVEY. Changes in these outlines have been made in line with Dr.
Fremont’s own convictions concerning the understanding of the correct divisions
and contents of each epistle. Other than this adaptation of outlines from Dr. Tenney,
no other text or commentary will be used.
The main purpose of the course will be to demonstrate to the students that students
of the Scriptures who are willing to spiritually and correctly approach God’s Word
as they compare Scripture with Scripture, can, with the help of the illuminating
ministry of the Holy Spirit, faithfully study the text of any book of the Bible and
receive understanding.
Another major purpose for the course is to lead the students into the conviction that
the study of God’s Word is a lifelong process and a responsibility that only begins as
they study any part of it in a course such as this. They must be willing, through their
entire lifetimes, to daily devote themselves to intense personal Bible study, and to
apply His teachings first to their own lives and then to teach his Word also to others.
It is to be emphasized that this approach does not rule out the profitable use of
commentaries and other helpful materials in the future study of the student, to help
the student more completely understand and teach the Word of God, but it
recognizes that there are many situations where these are not available, or even are
not completely reliable, and that students of the Bible must still learn to rely mainly
on the Holy Spirit as their teacher and illuminator of what they personally study.
COURSE REQUIREMENTS:
By the end of the second full week of study in the course, each student will be
required to have read the entire set of the seven General Epistles through one time
carefully. Students will be asked to confirm that they have met this requirement.
After the second week of study, as preparation for each class session, students will
be given brief and simple assignments which they are faithfully to complete before
that next class period begins. These may include either reading assignments or
written assignments that are to be handed in and graded by the Professor.
At the discretion of the Professor, frequent quizzes may be given to test both the
faithfulness of the students in completing their assignments, and also to test their
understanding of the material they study personally and in class sessions.
106
Except when this course may be taught as a short-term module, there will be a mid-
term exam and a final exam. Before each major exam, a list of study questions will
be given to the students to give them some direction in preparing for the exams.
It is also expected that faithful class attendance, close attention to the teaching and
class discussions of each period and the faithful taking of notes in each session will
be required. Class attitude on the part of each student will also be closely observed.
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES:
As already stated, the main resource will be the Scriptural text of each epistle being
studied.
Other authors and teachers may be referred to from time to time, but their opinions
and interpretations of a passage will be evaluated for the fidelity of these authors
and teachers to the actual meaning of the passage being studied.
107