0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views4 pages

Calculus Integrals

The document discusses the importance of calculus and integration. It states that calculus was one of the first achievements of modern mathematics and defines the inception of modern mathematics. Calculus and the system of mathematical analysis developed from it still constitute the greatest technical advance in exact thinking. Integration allows the calculation of areas under curves and the relationship between derivatives and integrals is defined by the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

Uploaded by

Chandra Park
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views4 pages

Calculus Integrals

The document discusses the importance of calculus and integration. It states that calculus was one of the first achievements of modern mathematics and defines the inception of modern mathematics. Calculus and the system of mathematical analysis developed from it still constitute the greatest technical advance in exact thinking. Integration allows the calculation of areas under curves and the relationship between derivatives and integrals is defined by the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

Uploaded by

Chandra Park
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Calculus: Integration

The calculus was the first achievement of modern mathematics and it is


difficult to overestimate its importance. I think it defines more
unequivocally than anything else the inception of modern mathematics;
and the system of mathematical analysis, which is its logical
development, still constitutes the greatest technical advance in exact
thinking.

John von Neumann

Chandra Park
Calculus
[email protected]
1 Areas and Distances
1.1 Example 1
Use rectangles to estimate the area under the parabola y = x2 from 0 to 1
Area of S must be somewhere between 0 and 1 because it is contained in a square with side length 1.

Suppose we divide S into four strips S1 , S2 , S3 , and S4

We can approximate each strip by a rectangle that has the same base as the strip.

Height
 1  of1 these
  rectangles arethe value of the function f (x) = x2 at the right end-points of the subinterval
1 1 3
0, 4 , 4 , 2 , 2 , 4 , and 43 , 1


If we let R4 be the sum of the areas of these approximating rectangles,

 2  2  2
1 1 1 1 1 3 1 15
R4 = · + · + · + · 12 = = 0.46875
4 4 4 2 4 4 4 32

A < 0.46875
Instead of using rectangles in Figure 4(b) we could use the smaller rectangles whose height are the values
of f at the left endpoints of the subintervals.

 2  2  2
1 1 1 1 1 1 3 7
L4 = · 02 + · + · + · = = 0.21875
4 4 4 4 2 4 4 32
We can see that the area of S is larger than L4 , so we have lower and upper estimates for A:

0.21875 < A < 0.46877


By computing the sum of the areas of the smaller rectangles (L8 ) and the sum of the areas of the larger
rectangles (R8 ), a better estimate is obtained:

0.2734375 < A < 0.3984375


1
Rn is approaching 3 as n increases.

1.2 Example 2
1
Show that the sum of the areas of the upper approximated rectangles approaches 3

1
lim Rn =
3 n→∞

 2  2  2
1 1 1 2 1 3 1  n 2
Rn = + + + ··· +
n n n n n n n n
1 1 2
= · (1 + 22 + 32 + · · · + n2 )
n n2
1
= 3 (12 + 22 + 32 + · · · + n2 )
n
n(n + 1)(2n + 1)
1 2 + 2 2 + 3 2 + · · · + n2 =
6
1 n(n + 1)(2n + 1) (n + 1)(2n + 1)
Rn = 3
· =
n 6 6n2
Thus

(n + 1)(2n + 1)
lim Rn = lim 2
 6n  
n→∞ n→∞

1 n+1 2n + 1
= lim
n→∞ 6 n n
   (1)
1 1 1
= lim 1+ 2+
n→∞ 6 n n
1 1
= ·1·2=
6 3

** Sequences and their limits will be studied in detail in Section 11.1.


It can be shown that the lower approximating sums also approach 13
1
lim Ln =
3
n→∞

As n increases, both Ln and Rn become better and better approximations to the area of S.

1
A = lim Rn = lim Ln =
n→∞ 3
n→∞

The width of the interval [a, b] is b − a, so the width of each n strip is


b−a
∆x =
n
These strips divide the interval [a, b] into n subintervals

[x0 , x1 ], [x1 , x2 ], [x2 , x3 ], . . . , [xn−1 , xn ]


where x0 = a and xn = b. The right endpoints of the subintervals are

x1 = a + ∆x
x2 = a + 2∆x
x3 = a + 3∆x
..
.
Let’s approximate the ith strip Si by a rectangle with width ∆x and height f (xi ), which is the value of
f at the right endpoint. Then the area of the ith rectangle is f (xi )∆x. What we think of intuitively as
the area of S is approximated by the sum of the area of these rectangles, which is

Rn = f (x1 )∆x + f (x2 )∆x + · · · + f (xn )∆x


Definition: The area of the region S that lies under the graph of the continuous function f is the limit of
the sum of the areas of approximating rectangles:

A = lim Ln = lim [f (x1 )∆x + f (x2 )∆x + · · · + f (xn )∆x]


n→∞ n→∞

**same with left endpoints


It can be proved that this limit always exists, since we are assuming that f is continuous.

Instead of using left or right endpoints, it is possible to take the height of the ith rectangle to the value
of f at any number x∗i in the ith subinterval [xi−1 , xi ].
sample points: x∗1 , x∗2 , . . . , x∗n

A more general expression for the area of S is

A = lim [f (x∗1 )∆x + f (x∗2 )∆x + · · · + f (x∗n )∆x]


n→∞

n
X
A = lim f (x∗i )∆x
n→∞
i=1

A is the unique number that is smaller than all the upper sums and bigger than all the lower sums.

We form lower (and upper) sums by choosing the sample points x∗i so that f (x∗i ) is the minimum (and
maximum) value of f on the ith subinterval.

1.3 Example 3
Let A be the area of the region that lies under the graph of f (x) = e−x between x = 0 and x = 2.
(a) Using right endpoints, find an expression for A as a limit. Do not evaluate the limit.
(b) Estimate the area by taking the sample points to be midpoints and using four subintervals and then
ten subintervals.

(a) Since a = 0 and b = 2, the width of a subinterval is

2−0 2
∆x = =
n n

Rn = f (x1 )∆x + f (x2 )∆x + · · · + f (xn )∆x


= e−x1 ∆x + e−x2 ∆x + · · · + e−xn ∆x+
      (2)
−2/n 2 −4/n 2 −2n/n 2
=e +e + ··· + e
n n n

2 The Definite Integral


3 The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
4 Indefinite Integrals and the Net Change Theorem
5 The Substitution Rule

You might also like