National Security Policy
National Security Policy
For 2022-26
Introduction:
National Security Policy is multi-pronged strategy for the future of Pakistan to ensure the
protection of its citizens and guard economic interests. The argument is that the nation of
Pakistan will be truly secure only if it has economic and human security alongside military
security. The NSP recognizes non-traditional security threats along with traditional security
threats. NSP have taken a citizen-centric approach to national security and placed a special
emphasis on economic security and social security. Key themes of NSP are
Background:
Since the country's inception, focus remained on military security and nothing was planned
beyond that. Traditionally, the threat to the Pakistani nation occurred at its borders,
emanating mostly from India. Hence, creating a robust military infrastructure
became a strategic imperative for Pakistan. Over time, threats to our national
security started to emerge not just from outside but also from within. The enemy could
“The traditional Security concept focuses on military security, while the new security
concept includes economic, social, environmental and cultural security dimensions besides
the narrow traditional military security, thus making it a comprehensive security concept.
Also, Traditional security concept addresses how to deal with the threat while the new
security concept stresses how the threat can be prevented from occurring.”
“Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security” by John Grin and others
⮚ Climatic effects, like flash floods, heatwaves or drought could kill far more people
than a war would.
⮚ Infectious diseases and pandemics play havoc with a nation.
⮚ Natural disasters kill thousands.
⮚ Terrorism and violent extremism emanate from internal and external sources alike.
⮚ Disinformation campaigns demoralise a nation.
⮚ Economic coercion such as sanctions can build up serious economic pressures.
Key Points:
The NSP contains chapters on national cohesion (unity), economy, defence, internal
security, foreign policy and human security:
3) National Cohesion
The policy stresses upon the need for national cohesion in order to maintain security
from within through unity. The need to preserve our identity through fostering
patriotism and promoting unity amongst the various ethnic and religious groups has
been given great importance. The policy also suggests that the federal nature of Pakistan
must be strengthened and good governance must be ensured in order to make public
service responsive, which would in turn strengthen the bond between the state and
citizens. The concept of e-governance has been pointed out as a means through which
such a goal can be achieved.
5) Internal Security
Historically, the concept of security has been attached towards securing a state’s borders,
however NSP 2022-26 clearly indicates that Pakistan is cognizant of the threats from within. The
need to combat terrorism, sub-nationalism and organised crime has been argued for in the
policy. It has been suggested that the life and property of the citizen must be secure from such
6) Human Security
In contrast to traditional security policies, NSP 2022-26 argues for the need of human
security as a means for national security. It has been suggested that the population must be
managed well in order to facilitate the improvement in quality of lives of citizens. In addition to
this, health security has been mentioned as a basic essential for security. Amid ongoing climate
change disasters, it has been pointed out that work must be done to control climate change
and ensure water security, as this could potentially prove to be far more threatening to human
life than any military threat. The need for food as well as gender security has also been given
special importance in this regard.
Article 256 of Constitution of Pakistan also prohibits private armies. “No private
organization capable of functioning as a military organization shall be formed, and any such
organization shall be illegal.
a)Strengths:
“ NSP has opened up space for the state apparatus to recognise non-traditional threats like
climate change and cyber warfare.”
Research indicates that Pakistan would face an acute water crisis by 2025.The need to focus on
human security as mentioned in NSP proves that the policy has been successful in identifying
such non-traditional threats.
Pakistan’s cyber space is under constant threat owing to advancements in IT made by our
neighbouring states. The cyber-attack on Iran’s petrol pumps in November 2021 (via Stuxnet
virus, created jointly by CIA and MOSSAD) illustrates how a lapse in cyber security can have
dire consequences for the security of a state. NSP 2022-26 adequately addresses this threat by
advocating the need for working on artificial intelligence in order to ensure the integrity and
defence of Pakistan’s cyber space.
Likewise, the rapid rise in population also poses a threat to the security and prosperity of
Pakistan, which would in turn threaten human security, which has been identified as a
challenged in NSP 2022-26.
iii- The Complexity of Non-Traditional Security Threats has not been Fully
Grasped
The concept of biological warfare, has not been mentioned as such in the policy. The outbreak
of COVID-19 exposed the nature of threats posed by viruses, which is evident when statistics are
taken into account
Conclusion:
In short, it is indeed a commendable step for the state to release a national policy document for
the first time ever. The way in which the document has addressed non-traditional threats
alongside traditional security threats. The manner in which human development has been
mentioned is indeed remarkable as the state apparatus is recognising the role of micro-level
factors in ensuring wider security of the state. Though the strengths of the policy are indeed
praiseworthy, the weaknesses cannot be brushed aside. It is unfortunate that there seems to be
no roadmap towards achieving the goals in the policy and the absence of a timeline further
exacerbates matters. No mechanism has been devised to ensure the continuity of the policy,
which further adds to fears of the policy being unbound in times of political turmoil. Despite the
pressing nature of such issues, it would be unjust to claim that the recent policy has failed in
absolute terms. Every state policy is bound to face criticism; however this does not mean that
the state has failed. On the balance, it appears that the state has made a praiseworthy effort in
highlighting security challenges to Pakistan and has provided the institutions with a framework
within which matters of national security can be resolved.