Fuchs1991 - Ten Years of Experience With Leak Detection by Acoustic Signal Analysis
Fuchs1991 - Ten Years of Experience With Leak Detection by Acoustic Signal Analysis
H. V. Fuchs
Fraunhofer-Institut Fir Bauphysik (IBP)*, Stuttgart, FRG
&
R. Riehle
Ingenieurgesellschaft ffir angewandte Sensortechnik (FAST), Langenbrettach, FRG
A BS TRA C T
1 INTRODUCTION
Supply o f water for both private households and industrial plants is o f wide
importance. This is also true for the Federal Republic of Germany, although
it is in a favoured position: where sufficient quantities of water could not be
* Director: o. Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. Dr. h. c. Karl A. Gertis.
1
Applied Acoustics 0003-682X/91/$0Y50 © 1991 Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd, England.
Printed in Great Britain
2 H.V. Fuchs, R. Riehle
Following a pilot study, v IBP was requested by TWS (supported by the West
German Ministry for Research and Technology, BMFT) to develop a
technique for reliable detection and exact location of leaks, which
--makes mobile operation possible in any part of a supply network
according to requirements,
--does not necessitate time-consuming and expensive mounting or
installation,
--permits systematic surveillance of the network at any time and under
any operation conditions,
--manages without additional computation time, extended consumption
analyses, statistical surveys, and complicated measuring equipment,
--makes the working conditions for the leak detector more comfortable,
--provides a reliable general survey of the whole pipeline section under
examination, e.g. between two hydrants, by just one series of
measurements,
---can be employed without raising maintenance cost dramatically,
--also correctly identifies and exactly locates smaller leaks.
H. V. Fuchs, R. Riehle
ta) (b)
Fig. I. {a) Measuring car [of TWSj lbr flow measurements and [bl first correlation
measuring device (of Metravib). s
Even though repairing small leaks with losses of only a few litres an hour
does not pay from the point of view of the waterworks' manager, they should
be kept under observation, since they themselves do not close again, but
require excavation sooner or later.
Such a high response sensitivity is, or" course, only efficient if the
measurement enables the leak to be pinpointed (e.g. located within the width
of an excavator shovel/. The method was based on 'sounding" techniques
(employing listening tube, geophone, etc.), but it had to be improved in
various vital respects:
Jfl ..................................................................
!..............,
....
I I
.(t) I i b(~)
'I 1,
II'l'IV
I
I -':- 222~
~GBA'~
I Ri"
T ,o T
I I i i
DI~ I , ; t
Fig. 2. Basicdescription of the LOKAL systemwith FFT analyser and desk top computer.
SA, Acoustic signal selective amplification, filtering and transmission; r~, time delay
pinpointing the leak; r 2, marking an inhomogeneity: ~, r4, marking termination of the
measurement section.
6 H . V . Fuchs, R. Riehle
I
"-i l
.. L " 53 •
I I 'r.. 1.I~
I il. +$.~
f VeNt3 I
'5
J
7 2 ~l.d. " I ]
2000Hz
(b)
Fig. 3. Improved correlation function RBA (a) by use of the coherence spectrum 72 (b) of
the two acoustic signals for setting digital filters.
Leak detection by acoustic signal analysis 7
to the pipe axis can be excited in addition, which are ill-suited for leak
location, because they are very narrow-band in character and their
propagation velocity may vary with frequency.
At every spot o f the pipe wall. water-borne sound also causes a certain
a m o u n t of structure-borne sound, which can be transmitted via solid
structures, but whose measurement means loss in sensitivity. With the IBP
technique hydrophones are coupled via hydrants directly to the water
column to receive as much of the analysable desired signal (water-borne
sound at the leak), and as little of the interference sound (structure-borne
sound of various sources) as possible. This was an indispensable
presupposition for the success of the method, especially on plastic pipelines,
whose higher flexibility to water-borne sound waves causes relatively high
damping of the longitudinal waves. For steel, cast-iron and cement pipes,
structure-borne sound sensors should normally be sufficient for routine-like
network surveys, because the installation o f h y d r o p h o n e s is m o r e
. . . . ~ 1115- • J
Fig. 6. Measuring device located in the TWS measuring car shown in Fig. 5. 8
Leak detection by acoustic signal analysis 9
complicated, and opening and closing hydrants and slide valves may
occasionally produce new leaks there. It is only in particularly difficult
situations that employment ofhydrophones is recommended for these pipes
as well. A second precondition for efficient leak location was radio
transmission of the acoustical signals from the sensor to the measuring point
(Fig. 4).
In its first commercial employments with waterworks and on various
industrial water supply networks, also with TWS, the LOKAL technique
was only used as just another auxiliary means for leak location, if several
prior attempts with already available methods had failed. The renovation of
a feeder pipeline (of TWS) leading through a trackless boggy forest was
postponed when reliable and quick location of new leaks, arising again and
again at short intervals, was found to be practicable with just one sensor in a
pressure control station and by application of autocorrelation analysis. It
In the TWS measuring car (Fig. 5) equipped especially for LOKAL, the
essential data about the network (site plan, information about lengths,
diameters, and materials of the pipelines) are available at the measuring
place by means of a microfilm reading apparatus (top left of Fig. 6).
TABLE 1
Consequences of a Systematic Network Surveillance by LOKAL t 3
its network surveyed again in the following years. Table 1 shows the gradual
reduction of the specific losses from 0.14 to 0.04 m3/h km, thus remaining far
below 0-06 m3/h km, generally considered as limiting level.
Today, a 5% higher water consumption is satisfied by a 3% lower water
supply within the same network. The specific losses of these waterworks are
thus not only just one-fifth of the average losses of the other public
waterworks in the Federal Republic of Germany, they also, serving here only
as an example, stand out from the very large group of 342 smaller
waterworks who are responsible for a water supply of 1-2 × 106 m3/a
(Table 2).
These initial practical experiences show:
- - T h e technique is competent to clear up complicated leak situations
when other devices fail.
TABLE 2
Maximum Specific Losses and Average Specific Losses with Waterworks of
Various Sizes I
(,00.000 A.lO.O00
_?_zo 280.000
~0.000 430000
--_ 000
5 SPECIAL F E A T U R E S OF LOKAL
the other, and the result is averaged over a long period of time, retarding one
of the signals by a value oft. This correlation function ofz shows that a peak
occurs at r that coincides with the difference in the transition intervals of the
two sound signals at the two measuring points.
The position of the correlation peak thus directly indicates the place of the
leak. t2 Only the exact length of the pipeline section between the two sensors
and the exact sound velocity at the respective measuring section should be
known, which is normally no problem in practice. Uncomplicated examples
as described in Refs 8 and 12 show that in principle autocorrelation of the
signal of just one sensor is also sufficient, if an acoustical reflector has been
installed at the other end of the measuring section, t~
This simple procedure, however, reaches its limit as soon as:
- - t h e leak noise itself is excited only weakly (e.g. by small leaks, with
cohesive soils),
w t h e sound waves are largely damped on their way from the leak to the
measuring points (e.g. in long pipelines, plastic pipelines),
- - t h e sensors also receive other acoustical signals apart from the leak
noise (e.g. from vibrations by construction or road works, traffic),
- - t h e pipeline does not transmit 'linear' sound waves, but, acting as a
resonator, vibrates itself (e.g. with insulated embedding of long-
distance heating systems, propped pipeline systems).
In all these difficult, yet quite frequent situations an attempt can be made
to condition the signals before the actual correlation by insertion of simple
analogue filters, in such a way that the wanted correlation peak stands out
clearly. Such a procedure, however, would be very time-consuming, since it
resembles arbitrary trial and error procedures.
Contrary to that, LOKAL operates right from the beginning within the
frequency domain (by 'Fourier transformation' of the acoustical signals; see
Fig. 2); An experienced eye can tell at a glance from the so-called coherence
spectrum to which degree the two sound signals are related ('correlated') and
to which degree they are interfered with by various influences.
The power spectra of the two received sound signals almost always show
a more or less monotonically falling tendency with increasing frequency.
They do not distinctly show the interference by unwanted noises, which are
not due to the leak noise. The coherence spectra in Fig. 9, however, clearly
demonstrate, e.g. how slightly the domain above 500 Hz is disturbed in case
(a), and how small chances would be in case (d) to produce a telling
correlogramme by noises above 300 Hz. LOKAL now permits the exact
selection of (and without much trying) that frequency domain in which the
leak noise leads to an analysable result. Although the peak in the
correlogramme corresponding to the critical case (d) is actually lower than
14 H.V. Fuchs, R. Riehle
I
1 t ,4,,
~llll-r"l'
! " I
I " !" r
~Iki~ ,uI
..... L.) I
em zemm
(a)
[ i
r
i 1
j : : ,,lf4q U ,I ] i :
. . . . . . ,,J. L
~II Illtl I I ,_,
i~I;ilit~
. . . . i
. . . . . ~l ~ ~/11~
i. i .,,.:~ x ~z sooe. i
(b)
i. I LIN x ~Z ~eee. •
(c)
O,Z
\/
• L--*~I L ,L .°
i.e
(d)
Fig. 9. Coherence spectra (left) and correlogrammes (right) for four practical examples. 8 (a)
Pipe burst of a cast-iron pipe; (b) leaking socket; (c) spot corrosion of a steel pipe; (d) crack in a
plastic pipe.
Leak detection by acoustic signal analysis 15
that of the sample case (a), it is, however, nearly equally distinct, when the
frequency domain is specifically limited.
In the meantime LOKAL has been brought another step forward; the
correlogrammes have been further improved by suitable manipulations of
the frequency-transformed functions.
I~I i i i,,i I II
i i I I.'| ~
|
,J~ .......... ...........i . . . . . . . . . . ii,
Ifl " ' ......... F T'~'"''"'="I lr ......... ~ ........ il F "
!Ji!
/ l l 'i 1!'1 Ii
I !I '~',l'i
'':r
L,, t , .
- 88 [msecl
8 + 88
Fig. 10. Example of an ambiguous result as it would be provided by a time-range correlator
(80-m cast-iron pipe with sharp bend).
! L ,.,Lt ' j
- 80 8 [msec] + 88
Fig. I !. Improvement of the correlation analysis as compared to Fig. 10 by setting digital
filters.
Leak detection by acoustic signal analysis 17
4
il i i ,: ~I t )
4-
i I t !. ii ! I I
ieckort v. A
48.3 [m]
~t!! !I I,
1 {
I ,, i !I
I~USS;
1327 [m/s] 4 1,
;ese~t l~nge B8 6 [ msec ] + BB
80.8 [ - : lleszun9 ERASE i i M : 8l SSi iTRAHS Auto OFF Q ~EMDZ
Uerst~rken ; I _I i I ' ' ! IT~t
Kana I A i
312 [mo~ J : I I Sc)1 i r,m
Kana I B J ~ i ,' .... "°~-°
IZSB [n~J
) 1 ~p#i o/,~rn
Hochpasc- 1 ,ff 1" I rlessm~j
FilteP
1 ~ 8 [Hz] B ii'I I: iT ,.ht~_ ....
Fig. 12. Optimized correlogramme of Fig. 10 by use of the digital filters and the comp
function of LOKAL 100 system.
away. The result of a simple correlation analysis in the time domain would
lead the observer to believe the leak was at 46.5 m. Selecting a frequency
window, would improve the result (Fig. 11) considerably, as would
application of the c o m p function. The best result, however, is achieved by the
LOKAL system, if both options o f the new device are used in combination.
The correlogramme in Fig. 12 above clearly indicates the leak at 48"3 m; the
place of reflection was completely eliminated.
For a long time plastic pipelines have been a particular challenge to leak
location; only extremely favourable conditions (short measuring sections
and big leaks) have enabled accurate location by simple time-domain
correlators and structure-borne sound sensors. The LOKAL system is
equipped for this special problem with a pre-amplifier tuned to 50-300 Hz.
By that and by applying structure-borne sensors leaks could be accurately
pinpointed on a 160-m long measuring section. For a 100-m long pipeline
section of high-density polyethylene scanned by structure-borne sensors, the
correlogramme in Fig. 13, as it would turn out on a top-quality conventional
18 H.V. Fuchs. R. Riehle
z4 l ----T ~! I
; I t ',ii, . il
+ [ ~ :,dlIl::~:, :: ) I[ :
.......... J,........ ~ ....... : , L t l ~ = = J . ~ Jilllll!~m,,:hd==a,J.,,........,. . . . . . . .
"~'l P-..Irll|l~rll,~r=.|nl~f rlllfFl~ll~Rmll !mll|l~llffl~l~|'il=el ;11 IT ~ll'~ ~{"~.~,"F~'"IF'"
J i ' 'i~ 'ill~!ll=i:ri" ' II '
I I rW $|llk'l, ' :~I I
il [ ' '.fill q ' : I
z4 i
- 648 8 msec i 64B
Fig. 13. Example of an ambiguous result as it would be provided by a time-range correlator
(lO0-m high-density PE, structure-borne sound sensors).
I '~ II i
I a I
÷ li I
I
..,* ............ t=. . . . . ~ ~J ,I,,I,i=r( IliJ~!t,~i,,.,~. ,.I....... ,
B . . . . r-,- ,,--~--,,~v,lqr, ,w~
Iff?H~."r' 1 ...... ~'- == ~ ~: i:: : = ' := -
~eckort v.A [ i ~ I
43.8 [mI _ I
PE hart I , f i
i 382 [m/s] 4 ;I
r
~ e s = t K4n~e - 648 8 msec] + 648
i 108. fi [mli I Me~,,,,9 ERASE i i": B I $8! i TR~S..C=uto OFF ] ENI)E
[ Uerst~rken 1 I i etn~eben
I ](ariaI A i
1
G25 {~J] , i I ; I I Schi ~,
E ! ' t .... ,~ . . . . k,,,
l(a.al S ) 1 LIJd IJL i 1, I
156 [mU;
I 'll ~l.i i i "~
M e $°s 'u°| i "~ ~ °
Filter ] 1 aden
18(] [Hz]~ e , Y
1S6 [Hz] 312 I
PE hart
1~.0 M u 1.1
Fig. 14. Optimized correlogrammeof Fig. 13 by use of the digital filters and the comp
function of LOKAL system 100.
Leak detection by acoustic signal analysis t9
REFERENCES