Maximizing The Right Stuff-The Trade-Off Between Membrane Permeability and Selectivity
Maximizing The Right Stuff-The Trade-Off Between Membrane Permeability and Selectivity
Ho Bum Park, Jovan Kamcev, Lloyd M. Robeson, and improvement of chemical and petrochemical
Menachem Elimelech, Benny D. Freeman* separation processes by increasing the use of
light hydrocarbons for chemicals manufacturing.
BACKGROUND: Synthetic membranes are through a membrane. Based on increasing OUTLOOK: Opportunities for advancing mem-
used for desalination, dialysis, sterile filtra- molecular understanding of both biological branes include (i) more mechanically, chem-
tion, food processing, dehydration of air and and synthetic membranes, key design criteria ically, and thermally robust materials; (ii)
other industrial, medical, and environmental for new membranes have emerged: (i) prop- judiciously higher permeability and selec-
applications due to low energy requirements, erly sized free-volume elements (or pores), (ii) tivity for applications where such improve-
Maximizing the right stuff: The adjustable constant, f, related to the average dis-
tance between polymer chains and chain stiffness.
This model was based on five hypotheses: (i) gas
trade-off between membrane permeation occurs via the solution-diffusion mech-
anism (see Box 1); (ii) gas diffusion is an activated
S
1A where the 1991 and 2008 upper bounds are
ynthetic membranes, based largely on ing scalability, and small footprint (1–3). However, superimposed. Notably, and in agreement with
polymers, are widely used in gas separa- all synthetic membranes are subject to a trade-off the upper-bound model (22), the slopes, li, j, of
tions (e.g., air dehydration; O2/N2 separa- between permeability and selectivity, as well as the upper bound did not change, but the posi-
tion; hydrogen purification; and CO2, H2S, practical challenges such as fouling, degrada- tion of the upper bound, bi, j, moved as shown
and higher hydrocarbon removal from natu- tion, and material failure that limit their use. in Fig. 1A for all gas pairs considered.
ral gas), water purification (e.g., desalination, ultra- The most significant changes in bi, j values
pure water production, drinking water treatment, Origin of the permeability-selectivity were with He-based gas pairs (specifically He/H2),
and municipal and industrial wastewater treat- trade-off where glassy perfluorinated polymers came to
ment and reuse) (1–3), bioprocessing (e.g., sterile The commercialization of polymeric membranes dominate the upper bound (23). Perfluoropolymers
filtration, protein concentration, and buffer ex- for gas separations in the late 1970s catalyzed a exhibit unique gas solubility characteristics rela-
change) (4, 5), medical applications (e.g., dialy- sustained search for materials with better sepa- tive to aromatic and other hydrocarbon polymers,
sis, blood oxygenation, and drug delivery) (6), ration properties. As the database of gas per- for reasons still unresolved at a fundamental level
food processing (e.g., beer and wine clarification meation properties on various materials expanded, (24, 25). These solubility characteristics account
and demineralization of whey, juices, and sugar) researchers discovered a trade-off between gas for the presence of perfluoropolymers at the up-
(7, 8), chemicals production (e.g., chlor-alkali pro- permeability, Pi (see Box 1 for definition), and per bound for some gas pairs.
cess to produce chlorine and sodium hydroxide) selectivity, ai,j = Pi /Pj, where i represents the For other gas pairs, bi, j values changed due to
(8), batteries (9), and fuel cells (10, 11). Potential more permeable gas of the i, j gas pair (e.g., i = introduction of new materials. Two classes of poly-
applications include energy generation (12, 13); O2 and j = N2 in air separation) (21). During the mers—PIMs (polymers of intrinsic microporosity,
energy storage (14); environmental applications 1980s, permeability data on six common gases e.g., polybenzodioxanes) (26) and TRs (thermally
such as carbon capture (15) and selective removal (He, H2, O2, N2, CO2, and CH4) were compiled, rearranged polymers, e.g., polybenzoxazoles)
of ions (e.g., nitrates and phosphates) contributing and the trade-off relationship between perme- (27)—gave exceptional performance. For CO2/CH4,
to surface water eutrophication (16); organic ability and selectivity was analyzed. Polymers several TR polymers significantly exceeded the up-
solvent recovery (17); pharmaceutical purification having the highest selectivity at a given perme- per bound. The bases for their unusually high
(18); catalyst recovery (18); and membrane crys- ability lay near or on a line, called the upper permeability/selectivity combinations are (i) high gas
tallization (19), distillation (3, 19), and emulsifi- bound, obeying the following relation (21) solubility, an inherent characteristic of high free-
cation (20). In many applications, membranes li;j volume glassy polymers such as PIMs and TR
are favored over other processes due to advan- ai;j ¼ bi;j Pi ð1Þ polymers; (ii) high gas diffusion coefficients,
tages in energy efficiency, simplicity, manufactur- which are also a consequence of high free vol-
where li,j and bi,j are parameters depending on ume; and (iii) for several gas pairs (e.g., O2/N2
1
Department of Energy Engineering, Hanyang University, the gas pair. An example for air separation (i.e., and CO2/CH4), unusually high gas diffusion se-
Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea. 2Department of Chemical O2/N2 separation) is shown in Fig. 1A. More per- lectivity, suggesting size and size distribution
Engineering, Texas Materials Institute, Center for Research in
Water Resources, and Center for Energy and Environmental
meable polymers tend to have lower selectivity, of free-volume elements in a range particularly
Research, The University of Texas at Austin, 10100 Burnet and vice versa. This study (21) became the stan- suitable for separating these gas molecules based
Road, Building 133 (CEER), Austin, TX 78758, USA. dard against which permeability and selectivity on sub-Angstrom differences in effective gas mol-
3
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Lehigh values for new and improved membrane mate- ecule size (28).
University, 1801 Mill Creek Road, Macungie, PA 18062, USA.
4
Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering,
rials were measured. A comparison of rubbery versus glassy (i.e.,
Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8286, USA. A theoretical model of the permeability/ flexible versus rigid) polymers (29) revealed that
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] selectivity trade-off (22) revealed that the slope, gas solubilities are uniformly higher in glassy
the pore size was reduced to ~1.5 nm, while ity (130 at 120°C), and a strong temperature de- 16,000 to meet water purity requirements, and
still maintaining high water flux (53), yielding pendence of H2 permeance, implying activated aquaporins have essentially infinite selectivity
nanofiltration (NF) membranes, thereby poten- molecular transport through the ZIF-8 pores. When and a permeance of 1.6 × 106 L m−2h−1bar−1 per
tially opening a large set of practically important defects were sealed with poly(dimethylsiloxane), aquaporin (68).
separations (e.g., dye removal from textile waste- the H2/C3H8 selectivity increased to 370, but H2 Graphene oxide (GO) has a high density of
water). The detailed formation mechanism of permeance decreased to 750 GPU. ZIF-8 has an oxygen-containing functional groups (e.g., hydroxyl,
such membranes is still under debate (54). Block effective aperture (i.e., pore) size of ~4.0 Å, so it epoxy, and carboxyl) and some vacancy defects
copolymers, such as those used to prepare the may be of interest for propylene/propane separa- in the 2D carbon lattice. GO can be prepared
original isoporous membranes, are expensive tion, a large-scale, highly energy-intensive sepa- inexpensively on a large scale by oxidation and
relative to traditional polymers used in water- ration (36). More recently, Kwon et al. reported exfoliation of graphite. GO sheets can be readily
purification membranes. If isoporous membrane heteroepitaxially grown ZIF membranes consisting dispersed in water or organic solvents, providing
were made entirely of such block copolymers, of two different ZIF layers (60). Submicrometer- facile means for membrane fabrication via well-
cost would likely be a considerable roadblock for thick ZIF-67 membranes were heteroepitaxially developed membrane-coating technology using
such materials, restricting their use to high-value, grown from ZIF-8 seed layers on alumina sup- GO dispersions (69, 70). Differing from nano-
low-volume separations (e.g., biomedical applica- ports. Addition of a ZIF-8 overlayer (~300 nm) porous graphene, adjustable 2D nanochannels
tions) rather than large-scale drinking or waste- on a ZIF-67 membrane led to very high propylene/ between adjacent GO sheets can be used for
water purification applications. propane separation factor (~200) with high pro- selective molecular transport. GO membranes
Inorganic materials offer efficient ways to pylene permeability, well above the upper bound can have high water-transport rates (71), because
tailor pore sizes and shapes and achieve narrow for both polymer and carbon membranes (36). the oxidized domains act as spacers to separate
pore size distributions, potentially leading to high However, since alumina is a brittle ceramic, this adjacent GO sheets and facilitate water molecule
permeability and/or high selectivity. For example, approach does not solve the basic mechanical intercalation, and the pristine graphitic domains
metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have been property challenge facing such materials, ren- in GO sheets create a network of capillaries allow-
studied for gas separation and other related dering scale-up of these membranes unlikely. ing almost frictionless flow of water, similar to
MMMs commonly consist of a dispersed nano- compared the CO2/CH4 selectivity with MMMs,
material phase and a continuous polymer matrix, including a bulky-type MOF, nanosized MOF,
hoping to marry the high intrinsic permeability and MOF nanosheets, based on the same MOF
and separation properties of advanced nano- material (85). Only MOF nanosheets in the MMM
materials with the robust processing and mechan- showed improved selectivity and no significant
ical properties of polymers (Fig. 3). Most studies permeability loss relative to the neat polymer
involving MMMs have focused on gas separation membrane. Similar effects can be observed in
membranes (76), in which molecular sieving par- other nanosheet-incorporated MMMs. When GO
ticles such as zeolites, carbons, and MOFs have nanosheets are incorporated into polyether-based
been incorporated into a polymer matrix to alter copolymer membranes for CO2 separation, CO2/N2
their performance. More recently, nanotubes and selectivity increased significantly compared with
nanosheets have been considered as the dispersed the pristine polymer membrane with no perme-
phase (77, 78). Koros and colleagues theoretically ability penalty, even at low loadings (e.g., below
analyzed the potential of MMMs, predicting gas 0.1 weight %) (86).
separation performance beyond Robeson’s upper
bound (particularly for O2/N2 separation) (35). Comparison of transport characteristics
However, most experimental results fall below of synthetic and biological membranes
the theoretical maximum because of unfavorably Fig. 3. In designing mixed-matrix membranes Unlike synthetic membranes, biological mem-
large interfacial gaps between the dispersed to overcome the upper bound, compatibility branes exhibit both high permeability and high
nanomaterials and polymer matrix and relatively between filler and polymer, filler particle selectivity. For example, the potassium ion chan-
limited dispersed phase loading due to particle size and shape, and homogeneous filler dis- nel in cell membranes is thousands of times more
agglomeration (79). As such, much of the effort tribution are important factors. (Case 1) permeable to potassium than sodium ions, despite
to enhance separation performance in MMMs Molecular sieving fillers (e.g., CMS and zeolites) the smaller ionic (i.e., crystallographic) size of
polymer/MOF interface, thereby reducing the as compared with isotropic MOFs. Rodenas et al. tion contiguous to the membrane (1 M), and DNaþ
lead to performance much worse than that ex- to 100 L m−2 h−1 bar−1 produces a meager 1.0% gain in product purity (3). In gas separation mem-
pected based on results from free-standing films. reduction in energy consumption. Similar con- branes, this concept is quantified by the pressure
Such support mass transfer resistance has been clusions were obtained when modeling RO brackish ratio (i.e., the ratio of feed to permeate pressure)
recognized, for example, to have pronounced water desalination (102). Although high-permeance divided by membrane selectivity (3). Pressure
performance-limiting effects in the current gen- RO membranes may have the potential to reduce ratios may be set by economic considerations
eration of forward osmosis membranes (40) required membrane area, this solution will not largely dependent on process conditions (i.e.,
and has long been important in gas separation be practical because severe concentration polar- independent of membrane properties). In gas
membranes (99). ization (CP) induced by the high water flux will separation applications, typical pressure ratios
In water purification membranes, RO de- significantly hinder process performance (1). In are 5 to 15 (106). Designing materials with se-
salination provides an example of the insignif- addition, membrane fouling, which is already a lectivity values much greater than the pressure
icance of high-permeability membranes on process major problem with current-generation mem- ratio yields little or no improvement in product
efficiency. Numerous studies have suggested that branes, is exacerbated at higher water fluxes purity, as shown in Fig. 5B. Membranes used in
developing high-permeance RO membranes could (103, 104). Rather than increasing membrane industrial hydrogen separations (3) and those
reduce energy consumption in desalination, permeance, increasing the water-solute selectivity considered for postcombustion carbon capture,
which is proportional to the applied hydraulic (or minimizing solute passage) of RO membranes for example, have low pressure ratios, limiting
pressure to drive water permeation across the should be a very important goal for improving the need for highly selective membranes (106).
membrane (1, 72, 96). However, energy consump- process performance and yielding higher-quality Wessling and colleagues recently demonstrated
tion is constrained by the conventional single- product water (48, 102). Current challenges with the use of upper-bound properties of membranes
stage operation of RO systems, in which the existing membranes include the removal of boron coupled with process modeling to identify eco-
minimum hydraulic pressure, and hence the in seawater desalination, minimization of the pas- nomically optimal combinations of permeability
minimum specific energy (i.e., energy per vol- sage of low–molecular weight toxic contaminants and selectivity for nitrogen removal from natural
ume of product water), is equal to the osmotic in water and wastewater reuse [e.g., arsenic, gas (107). Such studies for other gas and liquid
pressure of the exiting brine (1, 102). Recent fluoride, and many uncharged solutes, such as separations of interest would be desirable to
Fig. 5. Effect of membrane support and operating conditions on a hypothetical material with separation properties above the upper bound.
separation characteristics of gas separation membranes. (A) Mem- The stars [right side of (A)] denote permeance and selectivity of thin-film
brane support. (B) operating conditions. (A) shows the 2008 upper-bound composite membranes of this material using different supports, showing
data for CO2/N2 separation translated into the selectivity and permeance that a high flux support is needed to reach desirable performance (blue
(i.e., pressure-normalized flux) that could be achieved by placing a thin shaded region) for postcombustion CO2 capture (15). The procedure for
(100 nm) membrane onto a slow (103 GPU), medium (104 GPU), or fast generating the upper-bound lines in the selectivity-permeance plot is
(105 GPU) porous support membrane. For brevity, only 20% of the 2008 described here (119). (B) shows the effect of varying membrane selectivity
upper-bound data have been shown on the selectivity-permeance plot. The on permeate vapor concentration for a vapor separation membrane
dashed lines indicate the expected performance of materials lying on the operating at a feed/permeate pressure ratio of 20 and 1% vapor in
upper bound. The star [left side of (A)] denotes permeability/selectivity of the feed.
pressures exceeding 100 bar (3). High-salinity bution, which can break the conventional upper 2. M. A. Shannon et al., Science and technology for water
brines (e.g., much greater than seawater, such as bound. purification in the coming decades. Nature 452, 301–310
(2008). doi: 10.1038/nature06599; pmid: 18354474
water produced from hydraulic fracking) would However, many questions remain about both 3. R. W. Baker, Membrane Technology and Applications (John
require mechanically more robust RO membranes new and existing membranes. For example, our Wiley & Sons, Inc., ed. 3, Hoboken, NJ, 2012).
to enable operation at ultrahigh pressures. For fundamental understanding of the basic thermo- 4. R. van Reis, A. Zydney, Bioprocess membrane technology.
example, using the extremely saline water (34% dynamics and diffusion properties of water and J. Membr. Sci. 297, 16–50 (2007). doi: 10.1016/
j.memsci.2007.02.045
salinity) from the Dead Sea would require mem- ions in polymers used in RO and electrodialysis 5. H. Lutz, Ultrafiltration for Bioprocessing: Development
branes operating at pressures of more than 250 bar membranes and many energy applications (e.g., and Implementation of Robust Processes (Elsevier,
(108). Details of the mechanical property require- fuel cells, batteries, and reverse electrodialysis) is Amsterdam, 2015).
ments and design criteria, both for membranes at an extremely rudimentary level (111), although 6. D. F. Stamatialis et al., Medical applications of membranes:
Drug delivery, artificial organs and tissue engineering.
and for their porous supports, are currently poorly recent advances in this area are allowing for J. Membr. Sci. 308, 1–34 (2008). doi: 10.1016/
understood, in part due to the lack of mechanical prediction of ion sorption and transport in highly j.memsci.2007.09.059
property data accompanying reports of new mem- charged ion exchange membranes (111, 112). While 7. K.-V. Peinemann, S. P. Nunes, L. Giorno, Membrane
brane materials. theoretical models have been proposed for the Technology: Volume 3: Membranes for Food Applications
(Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2010).
Membrane materials must also be chemically upper bound for gas separation membranes (22) 8. T. Sata, Ion Exchange Membranes: Preparation,
and thermally tolerant to conditions encountered and desalination membranes (47), no such analog Characterization, Modification and Application (Royal Society
during operation. For example, oxidatively stable exists today for other separations, such as electro- of Chemistry, London, 2004).
(i.e., chlorine tolerant) RO membranes remain an dialysis, although the empirical evidence is over- 9. P. Arora, Z. J. Zhang, Battery separators. Chem. Rev. 104,
4419–4462 (2004). doi: 10.1021/cr020738u;
elusive goal. Such materials are needed because whelming that such a trade-off exists (46). There pmid: 15669158
aqueous chlorine (e.g., hypochlorite) is widely is a real need for fundamental modeling, at length 10. S. J. Peighambardoust, S. Rowshanzamir, M. Amjadi,
used to control biological activity in water streams scales ranging from atomistic to continuum, to Review of the proton exchange membranes for fuel cell
being fed to desalination processes, and current provide rational guidance for designing future applications. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 35, 9349–9384
(2010). doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.05.017
aromatic polyamide–based polymers, the state of membranes. More recently developed nanomate-
26. P. M. Budd, N. B. McKeown, D. Fritsch, Free volume and 47. H. Zhang, G. M. Geise, Modeling the water permeability and 68. A state-of-the-art commercial RO membrane (Dow SEAMAXX
intrinsic microporosity in polymers. J. Mater. Chem. 15, 1977 water/salt selectivity tradeoff in polymer membranes. 440i) has a reported water volumetric flow rate of 17,000
(2005). doi: 10.1039/b417402j J. Membr. Sci. 520, 790–800 (2016). doi: 10.1016/ gallons per day through an active membrane area of 41 m2
27. H. B. Park et al., Polymers with cavities tuned for fast j.memsci.2016.08.035 when operated as designed (i.e., feed salt concentration =
selective transport of small molecules and ions. Science 318, 48. J. R. Werber, C. O. Osuji, M. Elimelech, Materials for next- 32,000 mg/L NaCl and feed pressure = 55.2 bar absolute)
254–258 (2007). doi: 10.1126/science.1146744; generation desalination and water purification membranes. (65). The water flux through this membrane is approximately
pmid: 17932294 Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16018 (2016). doi: 10.1038/ 65 L m−2 hour−1. Normalizing for the driving force for water
28. L. M. Robeson, M. E. Dose, B. D. Freeman, D. R. Paul, Analysis natrevmats.2016.18 transport (i.e., Dp Dp ¼ 55:2 bar 27:1 bar ¼ 28:1 bar),
of the transport properties of thermally rearranged (TR) 49. X. Li et al., Nature gives the best solution for desalination: the permeance is 2.3 L m−2 hour−1 bar−1. The osmotic pressure
polymers and polymers of intrinsic microporosity (PIM) Aquaporin-based hollow fiber composite membrane with difference, Dp, was calculated using the van’t Hoff relation (i.e.,
relative to upper bound performance. J. Membr. Sci. 525, superior performance. J. Membr. Sci. 494, 68–77 (2015). p = CRT). The salt concentration in the permeate (96 mg/L)
18–24 (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.085 doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.07.040 was calculated from the reported salt rejection (99.70%) and a
29. L. M. Robeson, Q. Liu, B. D. Freeman, D. R. Paul, 50. S. Y. Yang et al., Nanoporous membranes with ultrahigh feed salt concentration (32,000 mg/L) (65). Aquaporins are
Comparison of transport properties of rubbery and glassy selectivity and flux for the filtration of viruses. Adv. Mater. 18, reported to transport water at rates of 3 × 109 molecules per
polymers and the relevance to the upper bound 709–712 (2006). doi: 10.1002/adma.200501500 second through pores that are 0.28 nm in diameter (93–95).
relationship. J. Membr. Sci. 476, 421–431 (2015). 51. K. V. Peinemann, V. Abetz, P. F. Simon, Asymmetric Thus, the water flux through an aquaporin is 52 × 105 L m−2
doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.058 superstructure formed in a block copolymer via phase hour−1, nearly 5 orders of magnitude greater than that in the
30. D. F. Sanders et al., Energy-efficient polymeric gas separation separation. Nat. Mater. 6, 992–996 (2007). doi: 10.1038/ commercial RO membrane. This estimate accounts for water
membranes for a sustainable future: A review. Polymer (Guildf.) nmat2038; pmid: 17982467 transport through a single aquaporin channel. Such channels,
54, 4729–4761 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2013.05.075 52. X. Qiu et al., Selective separation of similarly sized proteins configured in a close-packed array, would have a packing
31. I. K. Meier, M. Langsam, H. C. Klotz, Selectivity enhancement with tunable nanoporous block copolymer membranes. density of 0.25% (66), so the maximum hypothetical flux
via photooxidative surface modification of polyimide air ACS Nano 7, 768–776 (2013). doi: 10.1021/nn305073e; through a flat sheet membrane comprising aquaporins at
separation membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 94, 195–212 (1994). pmid: 23252799 this packing density would be 1.3 × 104 L m−2 hour−1, which
doi: 10.1016/0376-7388(93)E0174-I 53. H. Yu et al., Self-assembled asymmetric block copolymer is ~200 times as high as that of the commercial RO
32. C. H. Park et al., Nanocrack-regulated self-humidifying membranes: Bridging the gap from ultra- to nanofiltration. membrane. This calculation does not include effects of
membranes. Nature 532, 480–483 (2016). doi: 10.1038/ Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 13937–13941 (2015). doi: 10.1002/ concentration polarization, support layer resistance,
nature17634; pmid: 27121841 anie.201505663; pmid: 26388216 fouling, or other effects that would likely be observed in
33. H. Nishide, T. Suzuki, H. Kawakami, E. Tsuchida, Cobalt 54. V. Abetz, Isoporous block copolymer membranes. Macromol. practice, so the value reported here should be used only to
83. A. A. Gusev, O. Guseva, Rapid mass transport in mixed matrix Technol. 49, 1436–1444 (2015). doi: 10.1021/es5044062; 118. L. Liu, E. S. Sanders, S. S. Kulkarni, D. J. Hasse, W. J. Koros,
nanotube/polymer membranes. Adv. Mater. 19, 2672–2676 pmid: 25564877 Sub-ambient temperature flue gas carbon dioxide capture via
(2007). doi: 10.1002/adma.200602018 101. I. Pinnau, J. G. Wijmans, I. Blume, T. Kuroda, K.-V. Peinemann, Matrimid® hollow fiber membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 465,
84. Y. Peng et al., Metal-organic framework nanosheets as Gas permeation through composite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 49–55 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.03.060
building blocks for molecular sieving membranes. Science 37, 81–88 (1988). doi: 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)85070-X 119. The gas permeance of a thin film composite membrane, JC ,
346, 1356–1359 (2014). doi: 10.1126/science.1254227; 102. J. R. Werber, A. Deshmukh, M. Elimelech, The critical need for can be calculated using the series resistance model (10)
pmid: 25504718 increased selectivity, not increased water permeability, for 1=Jc ¼ ‘A =PA þ 1=JB , where PA is the gas permeability (in
85. T. Rodenas et al., Metal-organic framework nanosheets in desalination membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 3, units of barrer) of the active layer, JB is the gas permeance (in
polymer composite materials for gas separation. Nat. Mater. 14, 112–120 (2016). doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00050 units of GPU) of the porous support, and ‘A is the thickness of
48–55 (2015). doi: 10.1038/nmat4113; pmid: 25362353 103. D. J. Miller, S. Kasemset, D. R. Paul, B. D. Freeman, the separation membrane (i.e., active layer). The permeance-
86. J. Shen et al., Membranes with fast and selective gas- Comparison of membrane fouling at constant flux and selectivity data in Fig. 4A were calculated using this model.
transport channels of laminar graphene oxide for efficient constant transmembrane pressure conditions. J. Membr. Sci. The CO2 permeance of the composite membrane was
2 1
CO2 capture. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 54, 578–582 454, 505–515 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.12.027 calculated from JCO c
2
¼ ð‘A =PCO A
2
þ 1=JCO
B Þ and the N2
(2015). pmid: 25378197 104. R. Zhang et al., Antifouling membranes for sustainable permeance of the composite membrane was calculated from
87. D. A. Doyle et al., The structure of the potassium channel: water purification: Strategies and mechanisms. Chem. Soc. JNc 2 ¼ ð‘A =PNA 2 þ 1=JBN2 Þ1. Finally, the selectivity, aCCO2 =N2 , was
Molecular basis of K+ conduction and selectivity. Science Rev. 45, 5888–5924 (2016). doi: 10.1039/C5CS00579E; calculated from aCCO2 =N2 ¼ JcCO2 =JcN2 . To demonstrate the
280, 69–77 (1998). doi: 10.1126/science.280.5360.69; pmid: 27494001 importance of the porous support layer, the N2 permeance of
pmid: 9525859 105. S. A. Snyder et al., Role of membranes and activated carbon the porous support layer in Fig. 4A is varied over a range of
88. J. E. McGrath, H. B. Park, B. D. Freeman, Chlorine resistant in the removal of endocrine disruptors and pharmaceuticals. values (1000, 10,000, and 100,000 GPU) representing slow,
desalination membranes based on directly sulfonated poly Desalination 202, 156–181 (2007). doi: 10.1016/ medium, and fast support membranes, respectively.
(arylene ether sulfone) copolymers. U.S. Patent 8,028,842, j.desal.2005.12.052 Assuming Knudsen selectivity in the porous support, the CO2
(4 October 2011). 106. Y. Huang, T. C. Merkel, R. W. Baker, Pressure ratio and its permeance of the pporous support
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
ffi layer is then calculated
89. G. M. Geise, D. R. Paul, B. D. Freeman, Fundamental water impact on membrane gas separation processes. J. Membr. Sci. from JCOB
2
¼ JBN2 MN2 =MCO2 ¼ 0:798JBN2 , where MN2 is the
and salt transport properties of polymeric materials. 463, 33–40 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.03.016 molecular mass of N2, and MCO2 is the molecular
Prog. Polym. Sci. 39, 1–42 (2014). doi: 10.1016/ 107. B. Ohs, J. Lohaus, M. Wessling, Optimization of membrane mass of CO2. The dashed lines in the selectivity-permeance
j.progpolymsci.2013.07.001 based nitrogen removal from natural gas. J. Membr. Sci. 498, plot in Fig. 4A were generated as described below.
90. B. Hille, Ion Channels of Excitable Membranes, Third Edition 291–301 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.10.007 The upper-bound relationship for CO2/N2 is (23)
(Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA, 2001). 108. A. P. Straub, A. Deshmukh, M. Elimelech, Pressure-retarded PCO2 ¼ 30; 967; 000ðaCO2 =N2 Þ2:888 . This equation was used
Science (ISSN 1095-9203) is published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1200 New York Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20005. The title Science is a registered trademark of AAAS.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim
to original U.S. Government Works