A.K. S.R. et al.
Journal of Energy Storage 59 (2023) 106494
Fig. 9. Top view of temperature contours of numerical solutions for Case 1 (a) 950 s (c) 1900 s (e) 2850 s (g) 3800 s and Case 2 (b) 950 s (d) 1900 s (f) 2850 s (h)
3800 s.
10
A.K. S.R. et al. Journal of Energy Storage 59 (2023) 106494
Fig. 9. (continued).
11
A.K. S.R. et al. Journal of Energy Storage 59 (2023) 106494
Fig. 10. Comparison of charging time for Case 1 and Case 2 at input power levels of (a) 9 W (b) 11 W (c) 13 W for varying PCM volume of 33, 66 and 99 %. (d)
Charging time of Case 2 at input power levels of 9, 11 and 13 W for varying PCM volume of 33, 66 and 99 %.
12