Power Factor Correction (PFC) Tutorial
Power Factor Correction (PFC) Tutorial
Power Factor Correction uses parallel connected capacitors to oppose the effects of inductive
elements and reduce the phase shift between the voltage and current
Power Factor Correction is a technique which uses capacitors to reduce the reactive power
component of an AC circuit in order to improve its eficiency and reduce current.
When dealing with direct current (DC) circuits, the power dissipated by the connected load is simply
calculated as the product of the DC voltage times the DC current, that is V*I, given in watts (W). For a
fixed resistive load, current is poroportional to the applied voltage so the electrical power dissipated
by the resistive load will be linear. But in an alternating current (AC) circuit the situation is slightly
different as reactance affects the behaviour of the circuit.
For an AC circuit, the power dissipated in watts at any instant in time is equal to the product of the
volts and amperes at that exact same instant, this is because an AC voltage (and current) is sinusoidal
so changes continuously in both magnitude and direction with time at a rate determined by the
source frequency.
In a DC circuit the average power is simply V*I, but the average power of an AC circuit is not the same
value as many AC loads have inductive elements, such as coils, windings, transformers, etc. where the
current is out of phase with the voltage by some degrees resulting in the actual power dissipated in
watts being less than the product of the voltage and current. This is because in circuits containing
both resistance and reactance, the phase angle (Θ) between them must also be taken into account.
We saw in the tutorial about Sinusoidal Waveforms that the phase angle (∠Θ) is the angle in electrical
degrees by which the current lags behind the voltage. For a purely resistive load, voltage and current
are “in-phase” since there is no reactance.
However, for an AC circuit containing an inductor, coil, or solenoid or some other form of inductive
load, its inductive reactance (XL) creates a phase angle with the current lagging behind the voltage by
o
90 . Therefore there is both resistance (R) and inductive reactance (XL) both given in Ohms, with the
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your
combined effect
preferences andcalled
repeatImpedance. Thus impedance,
visits. By clicking represented
“Accept All”, you consent toby
thethe
usecapital
of ALL letter Z, is the
the cookies. However,
resulting
you mayvalue given in
visit "Cookie Ohms due
Settings" to the acombined
to provide controlledeffect of a circuits resistance and reactance.
consent.
Consider
Cookie the RL series
Settings circuit
Accept All below.
RL Series Circuit
Since it is a series circuit, the current must therefore be common to both the resistor and the inductor
so the voltage dropped across the resistor, VR is “in-phase” with the series current while the voltage
o
drop across the inductor, VL “leads” the current by 90 (ELI). As a result the voltage dropped across
the resistor is placed on the current vector because both vectors are in-phase, while the voltage
developed across the inductor coil is drawn in a vertical direction due to the voltage leading the
o
current by 90 .
Thus the vector diagram drawn for each component will have the current vector as its reference with
the two voltage vectors being plotted with respect to their position as shown.
The resistor voltage VR is plotted along the horizontal or “real axis” and the inductor voltage VL is
plotted on the vertical or “imaginary axis”. In order to find the resulting voltage VS developed across
the series connected circuit we must combine together the two individual vectors using the current as
our reference. The resulting vectorial voltage can easily be found using Pythagoras’ theorem as the
We use cookies
combination of Von our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your
R and VL forms a right angled triangle as shown below.
preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However,
you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Phasor Diagram for the Series RL Circuit
Cookie Settings Accept All
2
The vector sum of VR and VL not only gives us the amplitude of VS due to Pythagoras’ equation of: VS
2 2
= VR + VL but also the resulting phase angle (∠Θ) between VS and i, so we can use any one of the
standard Trigonometry functions of Sine, Cosine and Tangent to find it.
We can double check this answer of 150Vrms using the impedances of the circuit as follows:
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your
2).preferences
The phase and
angle Θ using
repeat Triganometry
visits. functions
By clicking “Accept is: consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However,
All”, you
you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
The calculated voltage dropped across the resistor (the real component) was 75 volts while the voltage
generated across the inductor (the imaginary component) was 130 volts. Clearly the sum of 75 volts
plus 130 volts equals 205 volts which is far greater than the calculated 150 volts. This is due to the fact
that the value of 150V represents the phasor sum. Knowing the individual voltage drops and
impedances we can convert these values into values that represent the power consumed, either real
or imaginary in the circuit.
Since, as we have seen above, the voltage and current are “in-phase” for a resistance, the phase angle
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your
is therefore
preferences zero
and(0), thus
repeat giving
visits. us cos(Θ) = 1. Multiplying V*I*1 will therefore give us the same real
2 By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However,
power value
you may as"Cookie
visit does using I R. to
Settings" Then using
provide our coil example
a controlled consent.above, the power dissipated by the 15Ω
resistor is:
Cookie Settings Accept All
2 2
PR = I R = 5 x 15 = 375 watts
When the voltage and current are “out-of-phase” with each other because the circuit contains
reactance, the product of V*I is called the “apparent power”, given the units of volt-amperes (VA)
instead of watts. Volt-amperes has the symbol “S“. For a purely inductive circuit the current lags the
o o
voltage by 90 so the reative power for an inductive load is given as: V*I cos(+90 ) which becomes:
V*I*0. Clearly then there is no power consumed by an inductance so there is no power loss, thus
PL = 0 watts. However to show that this wattless power exists in an AC circuit, it is called volt-amperes
reactive (VAR) and is given the symbol “Q“. So the volt-amperes reactive, or simply “reactive power”
for an inductive circuit uses the symbol QL.
o
Similary, for a purely capacitive circuit the current leads the voltage by 90 , the reative power for a
o
capacitive load is given as: V*I cos(-90 ) which again becomes: V*I*0. Clearly then and as before, there
is no power consumed by a capacitance so there is no power loss as PC = 0 watts. So to show that this
wattless power exists in a capacitive circuit, it is called volt-amperes reactive capacitive and is given
the symbol QC. Note here that the reactive power of a capacitance is defined as being negative,
resulting in -QC.
So again using our example above, the reactive power flowing in and out of the inductor at a rate
determined by the frequency is given as:
2 2
QL = I XL = 5 x 26 = 650 VAR
o
As there is a 90 phase difference between the voltage and the current waveforms in a pure reactance
o
(either inductive or capacitive) we multiply V*I by sin(Θ) to give the vertical component that is 90
o
out-of-phase. However, the sine of the angle (sin 90 ) gives the result as “1” so we can find the reactive
power by simply multiplying the rms voltage and current values as shown.
2 o
QL = I XL = V*I*sin(Θ) = 130*5*sin(90 ) = 130*5*1 = 650 VAR
Then we can see that the volts-amperes reactive or VAR part has a magnitude (the same as for the real
o
power) but no phase angle associated with it. That is reactive power is always on the 90 vertical
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your
axis. So if we know that:
preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However,
you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
2
PR = I R = 375 Watts
Cookie Settings Accept All
and
2
QL = I XL = 650 VAR (ind.)
we can construct a power triangle to show the relationship between P, Q, and S as shown.
Again we can use the previous Pythagoras’ Theorem and the Trigonometry functions of Sine, Cosine
and Tangent to define a power triangle.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your
preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However,
you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your
preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However,
you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
2 2
We can confirm that the circuit draws 500VA of complex power from the supply as S = I Z, so 5 x
20 = 500VA and the construction of a power triangle would also confirm this as being correct.
However, this complex or apparent power being consumed by the series RL circuit is large because the
phase angle (Θ) by which the voltage leads the current (ELI) is also large resulting in a poor power
o
factor of 0.5 (cos60 ) lagging. So we need to cancel some of this inductive reactive power being
consumed (433 VAR) by the coil used to sustain the coils magnetic field by adding some more
reactance to it but of the opposite type to the circuit.
Should we be concerned about the coils low power factor. Well yes as power factor is the ratio of the
coils real power to its apparent power (Watts/Volt-Amperes), it gives an indication of how effectively
the electrical power being supplied is being used. Thus a low power factor means that the electrical
We use
power cookies
being on ouriswebsite
supplied to give
not fully you the
utilised most
as in ourrelevant
example experience by at
coil above, remembering
50% poweryour
factor (W/VA =
preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However,
250/500) it takes 500VA to produce just 250W of real power.
you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
If the coil has inductive reactance which is positive, then we must add some capacitive reactance
Cookie Settings Accept All
which is negative to cancel it out and improve the coils overall power factor value. Adding capacitors
to reduce a circuits phase angle and reactive power consumption is referred to as power factor
correction which allows us to reduce a circuits power factor to nearer 1, unity.
The power factor of an AC circuit can vary from between 0 and 1 depending on the strength of the
inductive load but in reality it can never be less than about 0.2 for the heaviest of inductive loads. As
we have seen above, a power factor of less than 1 means that there is reactive power consumption
which increases the closer it gets to 0 (fully inductive). Clearly then a power factor of exactly “1”
means the circuit consumes zero reactive power (fully resistive) resulting in a power factor angle of
o
0 . This is referred to as “unity power factor”.
Adding a capacitor in parallel with the coil will not only reduce this unwanted reactive power, but will
also reduce the total amount of current taken from the source supply. In theory capacitors could
provide 100% of compensated reactive power required in a circuit, but in practice a power factor
correction of between 95% and 98% (0.95 to 0.98) is usually sufficient. So using our coil from example
no2 above, what value of capacitor is required to improve the power factor from 0.5 to 0.95.
o
A power factor of 0.95 is equal to a phase angle of: cos(0.95) = 18.2 thus the amount of VAR required
is:
o
Therefore for a phase angle of 18.2 we need a reactive power value of 82.2VAR. If the original
uncorrected VAR value was 433VAR and the new calculated value is 82.2VAR, we need a reduction of
433 – 82.2 = 350.8 VAR(capacitive). Therefore:
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your
preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However,
you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
So to improve the power factor of the coil in example no2 from 0.5 to 0.95 requires a parallel
connected capacitor of 93uF. Using the values from above we can now calculate the amount of real
power supplied by the source after the power factor correction has been applied.
We can also construct a power triangle to show the before and after values for VA (S) and VAR (Q) as
shown.
Power Triangle
If the circuits apparent power has been reduced from 500VA to just 263VA, we can calculate the rms
current supplied as:
S We
= V*I, therefore:
use cookies I = to
on our website S/V
give=you
263/100
the most = 2.63 experience
relevant Amperes by remembering your
preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However,
you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie
So just by Settings
connectingAccept All
a capacitor across the coil not only improves its overall power factor from 0.5 to
0.95, but reduces the supply current from 5 amperes to 2.63 amperes, a reduction of some 47%. The
final circuit will look like this.
You could if so wished, increase the capacitor value from the calculated value above of 93uF for our
simple example, to the maximum value of 114.8uF improving the power factor further from the
required 0.95 to 1.0 (unity). In reality a single standard 100uF non-polarised capacitor would be
sufficient for this example.
We have seen in this tutorial that a lagging power factor due to an inductive load increases the power
losses in an AC circuit. Adding a suitable capacitive reactive component in the form of a capacitor in
parallel with an inductive load, we can reduce the phase difference between the voltage and current.
This has the effect of reducing the circuits power factor, that is the ratio of active power to the
apparent power, as well as improving the power quality of the circuit and reduces the amount of
source current required. This technique is called “Power Factor Correction”.
27 Comments
Submit
• Sirelkhatim Nugud
SSR ?
Update
wanted to calculate Power Loss in the electrical instrument (Voltage relay : Din rail based )
Anybody , knowing how to put required data to a tabular format explaining the power loss
during the functioning of the instrument ??
I want to improve powerfactor.9 to 1,if added more capacitor parallel whypowerfactor not
improving?
In practice, power factor correction is not simply done by adding more capacitors.
Modern power factor correcting switching power supplies have a front-end “boost
converter” following the mains rectifier. A boost converter is a non isolating switcher
which increases the input voltage to up to 500V. This voltage is about the maximum an
aluminum electrolytic converter can handle. The charge of a capacitor increases by the
square of its voltage given for the same volume.
Only after this boost converter there will be an isolating converter, which can have many
different topologies.
I am an enthusiast with under-grad level of electronics knowledge (that is, I know what
Kirchhoff’s Rule does, but can’t apply it now, after having left the University two decades ago) .
Anyway, found this article to be a good refresher. It was rather easy to follow, with just enough
maths to make it palatable.
Great article. Though I didn’t understand why at the end XL =XC = 28.5ohm
And Xc =93uF isn’t it supposed to be C?
A small
Cookie Settings typo, thanks
Accept All
Posted on September 26th 2021 | 4:21 pm
Reply
• AVIOMOH GILBERT
An engineer in making
Many good things here but also many incorrect statements and concepts. For example, “takes
500VA to produce just 250W of real power” is meaningless. Apparent power is not supplied
power. This same issue appears in the statement “Adding a capacitor in parallel with the coil will
not only reduce this unwanted reactive power, but will also reduce the total amount of current
taken from the source supply.” False! Adding a capacitor reduces the impedance Z and thus
increases the supply current: I_supply = V_supply/Z. Improving the Power Factor to unity is the
same has making the circuit resonant (i.e. X_total = 0) which allows the circuit to
consume/deliver more power. This is of course what one wants for electric motors.
Thank you for this article. I am in industrial electro-technician and this was a very good review
for what a power factor, rlc circuit and voltage/current calculations are.
Regards.
Thanks � � �
Best Notes.
Wow! Thanks so much i feel more confident taking the electronics test at my job for an
�
upcoming position im applying for. Will let you know if i passed�
this site is very helpful, it is like studying at home and learn basic electronic and electrical which
is very essential.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your
preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However,
you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.