Liu 2007
Liu 2007
Fig. 1 Part of the search and rescue robots developed in Prof. Hirose’s laboratory
(a) ACM III; (b) ACM-R2; (c) ACM-R3; (d) GENBU-I; (e) GENBU-II; (f) GENBU-III; (g) SOURYU-I; (h) SOURYU-II
Fig. 3 MOIRA
Fig. 6 RESDOG
www.jaeri.go.jp/english/press/2001/010314/, 2005-08-25;
http://www.jaeri.go.jp/english/press/2001/010809/, 2005-08-
25). By remotely controlled, RESQ series robots have
designated missions such as collecting early information
(RESQ-A), collecting detailed information (RESQ-B), and
collecting sample (RESQ-C). RaBOT is co-developed by
Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Naka Institute, and Fusion
Nuclear Technology. With high mobility, it can easily go up
or down stairs.
In Chiba University, Nonami et al. performed an extensive
research on mine detection robots and air unmanned planes
Fig. 4 CUBIC-R (http://mec2.tm.chiba-u.jp/~nonami, 2005-08-25). As shown
in Fig. 9(a)–(c), the detection system at the front of a mine
Figure 8 shows the operation robot RESQ series and detection robot has high sensitivity. The aerial search and
RaBOT developed by Japan Atomic Energy Agency for the rescue robot in Fig. 9(d) is wireless controlled by ground
implementation in the atomic nucleus radiation sites (http:// operators.
407
robot. Enryu’s most striking feature is its two huge hydrauli- small size and light weight. Among them, Micro VGTV and
cally operated arms with moving steel grips. Each of them can Micro Traces were proved to be more efficient than Mini
be stretched to 5 m and can lift up 500 kg. Trace in constrained space. Foster-Miller companies also
used the three robots: Talon, SOLEM and Urbot shown in
2.2 USA Fig. 11(d)–(f). With the better sensor and load-carrying
capacity, they are larger than the robots from Inuktun because
After the 9.11 attack, search and rescue robotic technology they have the NASA’s military background. SOLEM was
has attracted increasing attention in USA. The rescue ope- used in ruins. Talon and Urbot were used for the inspection in
ration at the 9.11 attack is considered to be the first application interior buildings. The iRobot also used two types of robots in
for search and rescue robots. Lieutenant Colonel John Blitch rescue operations: Packbot and ATRV. The tracked Packbot
(ret.), the director of the Center for Robotic Assisted Search had remarkable traction and self-adjustment ability. The big
and Rescue (CRASAR), requested a team of robot experts ATRV had a large wheeled mobile platform.
and suppliers to assist in search efforts at the World Trade In USA, a lot of university research centers, national
Center (WTC) disaster site. New York City’s Office of Emer- research institutes and companies also conduct researches on
gency Management directly requested CRASAR’s response. search and rescue robots. In Center for Robotic Assisted
After several hours of the terrorist attack, CRASAR quickly Search and Rescue (CRASAR), a non-profit research center
responded to the WTC disaster. This is the first known based at the University of Florida that is led by Robin Murphy
application of robots for USAR. Eight types of the rescue CRASAR, has developed many robotic technologies to assist
robots are shown in Fig. 11 [11]. search and rescue teams [12]. As shown in Fig. 12(a), the
As shown in Fig. 11(a)–(c), some types of robots from rescue robot Bujold is equipped with medical sensors. The
Inuktun are Micro VGTV, Micro Traces and Mini Traces, tracked robot has high mobility and excellent detection
respectively. They have been mostly used in ruins for their capabilities. Meanwhile, the robot can collect information
409
Fig. 11 Search and rescue robots used in World Trade Center’s rescue operation
(a) Micro VGTV; (b) Micro Traces; (c) Mini Traces; (d) Talon; (e) SOLEM; (f) Urbot; (g) Packbot; (h) ATRV
such as survivors, physical information and environmental Fig. 12(c) [14], is developed by Larson et al. in the same
information and then transmit them outside. The SCOUT university. The multi-sensor rescue robot in Fig. 12(d) is
robot in Fig. 12(b) is developed by Stoeter et al. from the developed by Helmick et al. from California Institute of
University of Minnesota [13]. With simple sensor modules, Technology [15]. With the fast stair climbing ability, it is
locomotion unit, and specialized operational tool, it can be simple and easy to be controlled. Figure 12(e) provides a
used for multi-robot’s parallel information collection. The rescue mobile robot with an elephant nose like a manipulator
robot has flexible protection wheels on outer side. With two developed by Wolf et al. from Carnegie Mellon University
inspection/locomotion arms, TerminatorBot, the physical [16]. The mobile robot has a mobile platform, which can
structure of which is very cleverly designed as shown in greatly increase the mobility and exploration space of the
410
manipulator. Figure 12(f) shows a modular reconfigurable lends Urbie in many different applications. Such robots could
rescue robot CONRO developed by Shen et al. from Southern investigate urban environments contaminated with radiation,
California University [17]. It can change its configuration biological warfare, or chemical spills. They could also be
into different ones including snake, six-legged, or circle upon used for search and rescue in earthquake-struck buildings
the requirement. Figure 12(g) is a three-dimensional loco- and other disaster zones (http://robotics.jpl.nasa.gov/tasks/
motion snake-like robot developed by Haith et al. from NASA tmr/ hybrid.html, 2005-08-25).
(http://media.nasaexplores.com/lessons/02-014/fullarticle. In USA, the search and rescue UVA or helicopter also
pdf, 2005-08-25). It has high mobility under unstructured attracts the researchers’ great attention. The Vision-guided
environments. Figure 12(h) is a modular reconfigurable robot robot helicopters shown in Fig. 14(a) from CMU can quickly
PolyBot designed by Yim et al. from the research center and systematically search a very large area to locate the
PARC [18]. It can fluently change its configuration to adapt victims of an accident or a natural disaster. They can be
to different terrains. sacrificed under very dangerous conditions to save human
The Urbie series shown in Fig. 13 is jointly developed lives. Prime examples include flying close to a forest fire to
by JPL, iROBT, CMU and USC from the Mobile Robot look for stranded individuals, searching in contaminated areas
program. In the DARPA Advanced Technology Office, this and identifying potential radioactive leaks after a nuclear
program has enlisted JPL’s Machine Vision Group in leading reactor accident (http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/project/
the design and implementation of its perception urban robot. chopper/www/index.html, 2005-08-25). The AR Yamaha
Urbie’s initial purpose is mobile military reconnaissance in Rmax shown in Fig. 14(b) is an autonomous UAV from
the city terrain; therefore, many of its features will also make NASA Ames Research Center, which provides a platform for
it useful to police, emergency and rescue personnel. With the intelligent surveillance in application domains ranging from
hybrid structures with track, wheel and leg, the robot is rugged security and military operations to scientific information
and well-suited for hostile environments and its autonomy gathering and land management (http://human-factors.arc.
nasa.gov/apex/docs/papers/aaaiss04/aaaiss04.html, 2005-08-
25). The rescue helicopter shown in Fig. 14(c) comes from
Air Search Rescue. This association is exclusively organized
for charitable, humanitarian and educational purposes, more
specifically, it is a qualified Multi-Rescue Disaster and
Missing persons organization which provides life saving
search, rescue and recovery with involvement of law enforce-
ment, fire rescue, emergency medical and general services
such as specially trained canine search dogs, underwater
scuba recovery teams, ground search with ATV’s, helicopters,
airplanes, with no compensation for services render, all our
non-paid Board of Directors and volunteers provide around
the clock emergency services (http://www.airsearchrescue.
com/helicopter_main.htm, 2005-08-25).
2.3 China
Sensors are the most vulnerable components for a search and 3.4 Communication
rescue robot. They have three applications: robot control,
environmental inspection and victims or survivals detection. Communications of a search and rescue robot include three
In robot control, the robot must be aware of its right position, aspects: between operators and robots, between operators and
posture, speed and inner status to keep itself work normally. victims, and among many rescue robots. All communications
Such equipment includes charge coupled device (CCD) should be wireless. The ideal situation is that the autonomous
cameras, laser rangefinders, ultrasonic range finder, contact robot has the ability to move in all environments, locate the
sensors, force sensors, infrared sensors and global position victims, and then communicate with a rescue team. In fact,
system (GPS) sensors. In environmental inspection, environ- there is a lot of software processing and it is difficult for
mental information is very important for robot’s working the robot to complete it independently. A human-machine
status, operation efficiency, saving energy and preventing interface is indispensable. Rescuers must predicate what will
accidents. Environmental inspection includes air quality happen to make good use of existing resources. In many
(oxygen, hydrogen sulfide, methane and carbon dioxide) cases, the robot is not only a tool, but also the substitute of
inspection and detection of temperature, humidity and radio- operators. Therefore, communications between operators and
active substances. Environmental information determines the robots include the robot control and the effective transmitting
effects on a human body to avoid the rescuer getting into of information collected by robots. The two main factors are
the similar dangerous situation. Environmental inspection the accuracy of control commands and the completeness of
includes both environmental geology and topography for the signal processing.
two reasons: 1) to avoid the environments with obvious threat Communications between operators and survivals are
to robots; b) to avoid causing greater damage and a secondary mainly voice and image transmission. Important bilateral
collapse. The static/dynamic ground, as well as its shape and audio transmission equipment is microphone. According to
414
audio interaction, survivors can not only know the arrival of attracted great attention of the experts/scholars in the related
rescue teams but also guide the rescue operation to further fields [30–32]. Currently, the research on the search and
look for other victims. An audio message is a very good tool, rescue robot mainly refers to the implementation of a single
but it also has shortcomings. The rescue scene is very noisy platform. Because the search and rescue robots gradually
with the roar of various machines. Voice discrimination is come from laboratory into the application, and with the
difficult. The communication among rescue robots is blocked environmental and manipulative requirements of search and
by ruins. Currently, there is no efficient way to accomplish rescue robots, many technologies integration and multi-agent
this, whereas, it is really urgent to be solved. networks are the future developmental tendencies of search
and rescue robots.
3.5 Operation
4.1 Integration of various technologies
The capability of an operation is considered to be a synthetical
index of a search and rescue robot. Mainly two issues exist. Because a search and rescue robot is developed for the
The operability denotes that the robots are easily to be dangerous and complex disaster environment, the research
operated. The manipulative ability denotes that the robots and development of a search and rescue robot and using
have the operational ability to some tasks. In operability, autonomous intelligent robots in disaster environments to
different types of rescue robots perform differently. The search and rescue are new challenges in robotics research.
robot must be controllable and easy to be controlled. The A disaster environment has uncertain and unpredictable
mostly used platforms are light-weighted, small-sized, and characteristics. Autonomy, flexibility, redundancy, fault-
portable. The manipulative ability globally embodies the tolerance, reliability, practicality and durability are the key
survivability, mobility, sensors, communication and human- performances of a rescue robot in the application. When in
machine interface. It mainly includes the following three a real application, it is inevitable to use the remote control
aspects. and monitor technology, human-computer interaction, multi-
1) Exploration. The commander and operator determine sensor technology, navigation and positioning technology,
the location of the dangerous disaster scene and then use the machine intelligence, network technology, multi-agent coor-
rescue robots for data sampling and recording or recording dination and control technology and the specially related
the building’s 3D Geographic Information System (GIS)
technologies for the disaster scene. Figure 18 shows some of
and physical information. According to the information, the
the traditional disciplines such as mechanical technology,
rescue commander or correlative staff determines whether the
sensor technology, control technology, signal processing
working site is safe or not to minimize the risk of rescue
technology, computer science and some newly subjects such
teams.
as artificial intelligence technology, new energy technology,
2) Search. The search and rescue robot goes into the narrow
new materials technology, multi-sensor data fusion tech-
space or caves where is unavailable to the rescue team to
nology, network technology, remote operation of remote
search or identify the victims or survivals.
3) Rescue assistant. The rescue robot provides a series of control technology, ergonomics, bionics, and a number of
services such as carrying the necessary equipment, supplying related disciplines such as psychology and disaster science,
the urgently needed material to the survivals, being the mobile engineering, rescue, the ruins of engineering, geology,
communications interim, communicating with the operators nursing, and other technical disciplines. Various categories
and the survivals, planning the safe route for the survivals, of knowledge’s integration will provide an effective operation
saving the survivals independently, protecting the survivals of the rescue robot system. It can be safely obtained that a
from unpredictable dropping fragments, and transporting the search and rescue robot system is the core technology that
victims or survivals. urgently needed by national development in a high strategy
Generally, there are different requirements for the level. It involves a lot of factors such as national security,
rescue robots at different rescue stages. The rescue robot or national economy and national technology competitiveness.
the rescue operation should adapt to the requirements and It will play an important role and have a major strategic
perform corresponding operations. significance in the national economy development and
security.
the disaster sites where a catastrophe may continue to occur. high-precision GPS and inertial navigation detection to
Compared with the disaster area, a public area is the relatively achieve high-precision flight path and the high-precision
safe area facing the public and the media. The defended area measurement of observing locus. Medical staff and ambu-
separating the disaster area and the public area is used for lances are mainly organized for the rehabilitation and trea-
an emergency rescue operation. Ground mobile robots can tment for rescued personnel. The complex rescue network
be designated with variety of different tasks. Ground robot will be a large-scale intelligent rescue system.
teams need to have mobility in ground, shallow marshes and
swamps. It is very important to rapidly and correctly collect
the information in order to initial rescue activities. Therefore, 5 Conclusion
unmanned helicopter systems and a rescue center should
be the transit points for information. The information Disaster prevention, mitigation and rescue severely affect
provided by UAV facilitates rescue teams facilitating the the safety of people’s lives and their properties. A rescue
detailed investigation and the rescue plan. Unmanned aerial operation plays an important role in public safety. In an
helicopters are unusually transported by rescue vehicles. extremely dangerous and terrible disaster, search and rescue
Operators in a rescue vehicle operate the UAV to investigate robots can replace rescuers and help them in related rescue
the disaster scene to provide high-value information by using operations. Search and rescue robots have wide applications
416
not only in an urban search and rescue operation, fire protec- 12. Murphy R R. Marsupial and shape-shifting robots for urban search
tion, public security, mining and environmental protection, and rescue. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2002, 15(2): 14–20
13. Sascha A S, Paul B B, Maria G. Autonomous stair-hopping
but also in other areas such as national defense, military and with scout robots. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International
even planetary exploration. Search and rescue robotic tech- Conference on Intelligent Robotics and Systems, 2002.
nology is urgently needed and is one of the core technologies Piscataway: IEEE, 2002, 721–728
at a national strategic level. It will play an important role and 14. Larson A, Voyles R. TerminatorBot: A novel robot with dual-
use mechanism for locomotion and manipulation. IEEE/ASM
have a major strategic significance in the development and Transactions on Mechatronics, 2005, 10(1): 17–25
security of the national economy. 15. Daniel M H, Stergios I R, Michael C M, et al. Multi-sensor, high
speed autonomous stair climbing. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ
(This paper was written in commemoration of the 30th International Conference on Intelligent Robotics and Systems,
2002. Piscataway: IEEE, 2002, 733–742
Anniversary of the Tangshan earthquake.) 16. Wolf A, Brown H B, Casciola R, et al. A mobile hyper redundant
mechanism for search and rescue tasks. In: Proceedings of
Acknowledgements This work was partly funded by the Chinese IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robotics and
Academy of Sciences Innovative Research Fund (A050104, F050108), Systems, 2003. Piscataway: IEEE, 2003, 2889–2895
and the GUCAS-BHP Billiton Scholarship.
17. Shen W M, Salemi B, Will P. Hormone-inspired adaptive
communication and distributed control for CONORO self-
reconfigurable robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and
References Automation, 2002, 18(5): 700–712
18. Yim M, Zhang Y, Lamping J, et al. Distributed control for 3-D
1. Erkmen I, Erkmen A M, Matsuno F, et al. Snake robots to metamorphosis. Autonomous Robots, 2001, 10(1): 41–56
the rescue. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 2002, 9(3): 19. Li K J. Research on the development strategy for extreme environ-
17–25 ment robots. Robot Technique and Application, 2003, 5: 14–22 (in
2. Casper J, Murphy R R. Human-robot interaction during the robot- Chinese)
assisted urban search and rescue response at the World Trade 20. Li B. Research on snake like robot and its application in urban
Center. IEEE Transaction on System, Man, and Cybernetics—Part search and rescue. Robot Technique and Application, 2003, 3:
B: Cybernetics, 2003, 33(3): 367–383 22–26 (in Chinese)
21. Wang Y C. New developments of the extreme environment robots
3. Hirose S. Snake, walking and group robots for super
in China. Robot Technique and Application, 2005, 6: 11–14, 18 (in
mechano-system. In: Proceedings of IEEE International
Chinese)
Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Piscataway:
22. Liu J G, Wang Y C, Li B, et al. Link-type shape shifting modular
IEEE, 1999, 129–133
robot for search and rescue. High Technology Letters, 2004,
4. Hirose S, Fukushima E F. Development of mobile robots for
10(Suppl): 179–183
rescue operations. Advanced Robotics, 2002, 16(6): 509–512
23. Liu J G, Wang Y C, Ma S G, et al. Analysis of tipover stability
5. Kamegawa T, Yamasaki T, Sato N, et al. Sequentially connected
for novel shape shifting modular robot. Journal of Mechanical
multiple-unit rescue robot platform. In: Proceedings of First
Engineering (English Edition), 2006, 19(2): 187–192
International Workshop on Synthetic Simulation and Robotics to
24. Blackburn M R, Everett H R, Laird R T. After action report to the
Mitigate Earthquake Disaster, 2003. Rome: University of Rome,
joint program office: Center for the robotic assisted search and
2003, 29–30
rescue (CRASAR) related efforts at the world trade center. SSC
6. Osuka K, Kitajima H. Development of mobile inspection robot
San Diego: Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command, 2002
for rescue activities: MOIRA. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ Inter- 25. Wang Y, Wang T M, Fei B Q, et al. Review of the key technologies
national Conference on Intelligent Robotics and Systems, 2003. in extreme environment robots. Robot Technique and Application,
Piscataway: IEEE, 2003, 3373–3377 2005, 6: 23–31 (in Chinese)
7. Tabata K, Inaba A, Amano H. Development of a transformational 26. Murphy R, Casper J, Hyams J, et al. Mobility and sensing
mobile robot to search victims under debris and rubble -2nd demands in USAR. In: Proceedings of IEEE International
report: Improvement of mechanism and interface. In: Proceedings Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumen-
of International Workshop on Safety, Security and Rescue tation, 2000. Piscataway: IEEE, 2000, 138–142
Robotics. Piscataway: IEEE, 2005, 19–24 27. Feng C G. Review of accidents and disasters in China in the year
8. Yang Z X, Ito K, Saijo K, et al. A rescue robot for collecting infor- 2004. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2005, 5(2): 1–11 (in
mation designed for ease of use. Advanced Robotics, 2005, 19(3): Chinese)
249–272 28. Zhang J Z. Review of the main meteorological disasters in China
9. Takamori T, Kobayashi S, Ohira T, et al. Development of UMRS during the years from 2000 to 2005. Meteorological Knowledge,
(utility mobile robot for search) and searching system for sufferers 2006, 2: 14–19 (in Chinese)
with cellphone. In: Proceedings of Systems and Human Science, 29. Cui Q X. Natural disaster loss in China is the third largest in the
for Safety, Security and Dependability: Selected Papers of the 1st world. Scientific Consult, 2005, 11s: 64–64 (in Chinese)
International Symposium. Amsterdam Boston: Elsevier, 2005, 30. Li X J. Natural disasters and disaster management in China.
47–52 Disaster Reduction in China, 2004, 6: 6–8 (in Chinese)
10. Yuguchi Y, Satoh Y. Development of a robotic system for nuclear 31. Ma Z J. System engineering for earthquake prevention and
facility emergency preparedness-observing and work-assisting disaster reduction in China. Disaster Reduction in China, 2004, 6:
robot system. Advanced Robotics, 2002, 16(6): 481–484 11–12 (in Chinese)
11. Micire M. Analysis of the robotic-assisted search and rescue 32. Peng K S. Analysis of main types and characteristics of natural
response to the World Trade Center Disaster. South Florida: calamity in China. Journal of Beijing Union University, 2000,
University of South Florida, 2002 14(3): 59–65 (in Chinese)