OUTLINE IN
CIVIL PROCEDURE II
(Provisional Remedies and Special Civil Actions)
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Discussion of class policies
B. Overview on the course/subject
C. Distribution of subject outline
II. PROVISIONAL REMEDIES
A. Nature
B. List of provisional remedies
C. Summary/Overview
D. Case: Calo vs. Roldan (G.R. No. L-252, March 30, 1946).
E. PRELIMINARY ATTACHMENT (Rule 57)
1. Nature and Purpose
2. Requisites
3. Ground
4. Limitation
5. Garnishment
6. Discharge of
7. Bond
8. Claims for damages
9. Cases:
a. Republic vs. Estate of Alfonso Lim, Sr. (G.R. No. 164800,
July 22, 2009)
b. PCI Bank vs. Alejandro (G.R. No. 175587, September 2,
2007)
c. Philippine Bank of Communications vs. Court of Appeals
(G.R. Nos. 115678,119723, February 23, 2001)
d. Republic vs. Flores (G.R. No. 167741, July 12, 2007)
e. Davao Light and Power Co., Inc. vs. Court of Appeals (G.R.
No. 93262, December 23, 1991)
Page 1 of 7


F. PRELIMINARY IN JUNCTION. (Rule 58)
1. Nature and purpose
2. Classification
3. Ground for issuance
4. Binding effect
5. Prohibitions on issuance
6. Authority to issue
7. Restraining order
8. Bond
9. Cases:
a. Orocio vs. Anguluan (G.R. Nos. 179892-93, January 30, 2009)
b. Dela Rosa vs. Valdez (G.R. No. 159101, July 27, 2011)
c. Heirs of Melencio You vs. Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 182371,
September 4, 2013)
G. RECEIVERSHIP (Rule 59)
1. Nature
2. Grounds
3. Cases:
a. Chunaco, et.al. vs. Quicho, et.al. (G.R. No. L-13774, January
30, 1959)
b. Chavez, et.al vs. Court of Appeals, et.al (G.R. No. 174356,
January 30, 2010)
H. REPLEVIN (Rule 60)
1. Nature
2. Possession on property
3. Effectivity
4. Return of property
5. Cases:
a. Tillson vs. Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 89870, May 28, 1991)
b. Twin Ace Holdings Corp. vs. Rufina and Company (G.R. No.
160191, June 8, 2006)
c. Navarro vs. Escobedo, et.al. (G.R. No. 153788, November 27,
2009)
Page 2 of 7


I. SUPPORT PENDENTE LITE (Rule 61)
1. When available
2. Form of support
3. Effect of non-compliance
4. Conditions
5. Cases:
a. Garcia vs. Court of Appeals, et.al. (G.R. No. L-14758, March
30, 1962)
b. Lerma vs. Court of Appeals, et.al. (G.R. No. L-33352,
December 20, 1974)
J. WRIT OF AMPARO
1. Nature
2. Proper party
3. Jurisdiction and venue
4. Issuance of writ
5. Return of writ
6. Enforceability of writ
7. Interim relief
8. Case: Republic vs. Ca Yanan, et.al. (G.R. No. 181796, November
17, 2017)
III. SPECIAL CIVIL ACTIONS
A. INTERPLEADER (Rule 62)
1. Nature
2. Partial default
3. Cases:
a. Wack Wack Golf and County Club, Inc. vs. Won, et.al. (G.R.
No. L-23851, March 26, 1976)
b. Lim vs. Continental Development Corp. (G.R. No. L-41818,
February 18, 1976)
B. DECLARATORY RELIEF AND SIMILAR REMEDIES (Rule 63)
1. Requisites
2. Parties
Page 3 of 7


3. Jurisdiction
4. Other remedies
5. Cases:
a. Office of the Ombudsman vs. Ibay (G.R. No. 137538,
September 3, 2001)
b. Spouses Mirasol vs. Court of Appeals ((G.R. No. 128448,
February 1, 2001)
c. Martelino vs. National Home Mortgage Finance Corp. (G.R.
No. 160208, June 30, 2008)
C. REVIEW OF JUDGMENTS AND FINAL ORDERS OF COMELEC
AND COA (Rule 64)
1. Basis
2. Effect
3. Relation to Rule 65
D. CERTIORARI, PROHIBITION, MANDAMUS (Rule 65)
1. Nature
2. Parties
3. When to file
4. Where to file
5. Basic conditions
6. Cases:
a. Spouses Dycoco vs. Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 147257, July
31, 2013)
b. Holy Spirit Homeowners’ Association vs. Defensor (G.R. No.
163980, August 3, 2006)
c. People vs. Duca (G.R. No. 171175, October 30, 2009)
d. Abaga vs. Panes (G.R. No. 147044, August 24, 2007)
e. Tangonan vs. Pao (G.R. No. L-45157, June 27, 1985)
f. Samson vs. Office of the Ombudsman (G.R. No. 117741,
September 29, 2004)
g. University of San Agustin, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals (G.R. Mo.
100588, March 7, 1994)
Page 4 of 7


E. QUO WARRANTO (Rule 66)
1. Nature
2. Parties
3. Jurisidiction and venue
4. Prescriptive period
5. vs. election contest
6. On elective and appointive offices
7. Damages
8. Cases:
a. Feliciano vs. Villasin (G.R. No. 174929, June 27, 2008)
b. Galano, et.al. vs. Roxas (G.R. No. L-31241, September 12,
1975)
c. Topacio vs. Ong (G.R. No. 179895, December 18, 2008)
d. Republic vs. Sereno (G.R. No. 237428, June 19, 2018)
F. EXPROPRIATION (Rule 67)
1. Jurisdiction and venue
2. Effects of filing
3. Objections and defenses
4. Writ of possession
5. Prohibited pleadings
6. Order of Expropriation
7. Multiple appeals
8. Just compensation
9. Cases:
a. Brgy. Sindalan, San Fernando, Pampanga vs. Court of Appeals
(G.R. No. 150640, March 22, 2007)
b. City of Manila vs. Te (G.R. No. 169263, September 21, 2011)
c. NHA vs. Guivelondo (G.R. No. 154411, June 19, 2003)
d. NPC vs. Spouses Zabala, et.al. (G.R. No. 173520, January 30,
2013)
e. Republic vs. BPI (G.R. No. 203039, September 11, 2013)
f. Land Bank of the Philippines vs. Dumlao (G.R. No. 167809,
July 23, 2009)
Page 5 of 7


G. FORECLOSURE OF REAL ESTATE MORTGAGE (Rule 68)
1. Nature
2. Jurisdiction and venue
3. Parties
4. Multiple appeals
5. Redemption
6. Writ of possession
7. Deficiency
8. Partial foreclosure
9. Disposition of proceeds
10. Cases:
a. Danao vs. Court of Appeals (G.R. No. L-48276, September
30, 1987)
b. Limpin vs. IAC (G.R. No. 70987, September 29, 1988)
c. BPI vs. Reyes (G.R. No. 182769, February 1, 2012)
H. PARTITION (Rule 69)
1. Modes
2. Jurisdiction and venue
3. Prescription
4. Appointment of commissioners
5. Execution
6. Cases:
a. Reyes, et.al. vs. Cordero, et.al. (G.R. No. L-14242,
September 20, 1920)
b. Dadizon vs. Bernadas (G.R. No. 172367, June 5, 2009)
I. FORCIBLE ENTRY AND UNLAWFUL DETAINER (Rule 70)
1. Nature
2. Jurisidiction and venue
3. Determination of ownership
4. Grounds
5. Provisional remedies
6. Allowable pleadings
Page 6 of 7


7. Award of damages
8. Effect of Judgment
9. Execution of judgment
10. Cases:
a. Canlas vs. Tubil (G.R. No. 184285, September 25, 2009)
b. Soriente vs. Estate of Arsenio Concepcion (G.R. No.
160239, November 25, 2009)
c. Banayos vs. Susana Realty, Inc. (G.R. No. L-30336, June
30, 1976)
J. CONTEMPT (Rule 71)
1. Nature
2. Classification
3. Jurisdiction and venue
4. Requisites
5. Penalty
6. Remedy
7. Appeal
8. Cases:
a. Lu Ym vs. Mahinay (G.R. No. 169476, June 16, 2006)
b. Tokio Marine Malayan Insurance Company, Inc. vs. Valdez
(G.R. No. 150107, January 28, 2008)
c. Inonog vs. Ibay (A.M. No. RTC-09-2175, July 28, 2009)
d. Lorenzo Shipping Corp. vs. Distribution Management
Association of the Phils. (G.R. No. 155849, August 31, 2011)
Special Instructions:
1. Read the applicable cases for recitation on the meetings the particular topics
and sub-topics are discussed.
2. On or before December 19, 2022, submit the digests of the fifty one (51)
cases listed in this Outline, personally hand-written on a yellow paper and
(paper or hard)-bound for posterity.
3. For the subject repeaters, they can simply refile their previous submissions, but must
include the additional case/s listed in this outline.
Outline prepared by:
DODIE OPINION TURLA
Page 7 of 7


