Problem Solving
Problem Solving
Inductive Reasoning
The type of reasoning that forms a conclusion based on the examination of specific examples
is called inductive reasoning. The conclusion formed by using inductive reasoning is often called a
conjecture, since it may or may not be correct. When you examine a list of numbers and predict the
next number in the list according to some pattern you have observed, you are using inductive
reasoning.
Deductive Reasoning
Example 3:
Example
Each four neighbors, Sean, Maria Sarah and Brian, has different occupation (editor, banker,
chef or dentist). From the following clues, determine the occupation of each neighbor
• Maria gets home from work after the banker but before the dentist.
• Sarah, who is the last to get home from work, is not the editor.
• The dentist and Sarah leave for work at the same time.
• The banker lives next door to Brian.
Solution:
From the clue 1. Maria is not the banker or the dentist. In the following chart, write X1
(which stands for “ruled out by clue 1”) in the Banker and the dentist columns of Maria`s row.
From clue 2, Sarah is not the editor. Write X2 (ruled out by clue 2) in the Editor column of
Sarah`s row. We know from clue 1 that the banker is not the last to get home; therefore, Sarah is not
the banker. Write X2 in the Banker column of Sarah`s row.
From clue 4, Brian is not the Banker. Write X4 for this condition. See the following table. Since
there are three Xs in the Banker column, Sean must be the Banker. Place a √ in that box. Thus Sean
cannot be the dentist. Write X4 in that box. Since there are 3 Xs in the Dentist column, Brian must be
the dentist. Place a √ in that box.
Therefore, Sean is the banker, Maria is the editor, Sarah is the chef, and Brian is the dentist.
Polya’s Problem Solving Techniques In 1945 George Polya published a book How To Solve It,
which quickly became his most prized publication. It sold over one million copies and has been
translated into 17 languages. In this book he identifies four basic principles of problem solving.
Polya’s First Principle: Understand the Problem
This seems so obvious that it is often not even mentioned, yet students are often stymied in their
efforts to solve problems simply because they don’t understand it fully, or even in part. Polya taught
teachers to ask students questions such as:
• Can you think of a picture or diagram that might help you understand the problem?
This step is usually easier than devising the plan. In general, all you need is care and patience,
given that you have the necessary skills. Persist with the plan that you have chosen. If it continues
not to work, discard it and choose another. Don’t be misled, this is how mathematics is done, even by
professionals.
Polya mentions that much can be gained by taking the time to reflect and look back at what
you have done, what worked, and what didn’t. Doing this will enable you to predict what strategy to
use to solve future problems.
Example: The product of the ages, in years, of three teenagers is 4590. None of the teens are the same
age. What are the ages of the teenagers?
Problem Solving Strategies
This strategy entails looking for patterns in the data in order to solve the problem, that is, the
solver looks for items or numbers that are repeated, or a series of events that repeat. This can be used
to solve many math problems and can be used in combination with many other strategies, including
make a table, make a list, or simplify the problem.
Example: Find the sum of the first 100 even positive numbers.
Solution:
Example: Find the median of the following test scores: 73, 65, 82, 78, and 93.
Solution: Make a list from smallest to largest: 65 73 78 82 93. Since 78 is the middle number,
the median is 78.
Often referred to as “trial and error”, it is important to recognize than an error really isn’t a
mistake at all. It helps to guide the problem solver to the next attempt at the answer. The following
are the essential features of the guess and check strategy:
Solution: Substitute each number for “n” in the equation. Six is the solution since (6 + 3)(6 -
2) = 36.
This strategy entails looking for patterns in the data in order to solve the problem, that is, the
solver looks for items or numbers that are repeated, or a series of events that repeat. This can be used
to solve many math problems and can be used in combination with many other strategies, including
make a table, make a list, or simplify the problem.
Hint: If n is the number of sides, then n(n-3)/2 is the number of diagonals. Explain in words
why this works. A 13-gon would have 13(13-3)/2 = 65 diagonals.
• Work backwards
This strategy is used to solve problems that include a number of linked factors or events,
where some of the information has been provided, usually at the beginning of the problem. This
entails starting with the end results and reversing the steps you need to get those results, in order to
figure out the answer to the problem.
Example: Fortune Problem: a man died and left the following instructions for his fortune, half
to his wife; 1/7 of what was left went to his son; 2/3 of what was left went to his butler; the man’s
pet pig got the remaining $2000. How much money did the man leave behind altogether?
Solution: The pig received $2000. 1/3 of ? = $2000 ? = $6000 6/7 of ? = $6000 ? = $7000 1/2
of ? = $7000 ? = $14,000
Example: At the Keep in Shape Club, 35 people swim, 24 play tennis, and 27 jog. Of these
people, 12 swim and play tennis, 19 play tennis and jog, and 13 jog and swim. Nine people do all three
activities. How many members are there altogether?
Solution: Hint: Draw a Venn Diagram with 3 intersecting circles.
• Draw a diagram
Drawing a diagram is the most common problem solving strategy. Very often, a problem solver needs
to draw a diagram just to understand the meaning of the problem. The diagram represents the
problem in a way we can see it, understand it, and think about it while looking for the next step. When
you draw a diagram, you organize information spatially, which then allows the visual part of your
brain to become more involved in the problem-solving process.
Example: Fortune Problem: a man died and left the following instructions for his fortune, half
to his wife; 1/7 of what was left went to his son; 2/3 of what was left went to his butler; the man’s
pet pig got the remaining $2000. How much money did the man leave behind altogether?
Sometimes you can find the answer to a problem by solving another problem that has simpler
numbers or fewer case. To use this strategy, first use a simpler or more familiar case of the problems.
Then use the same concepts and relationships to solve the original problem.
Example: In a delicatessen, it costs $2.49 for a half pound of sliced roast beef. The person
behind the counter slices 0.53 pound. What should it cost?
Solution: Try a simpler problem. How much would you pay if a half pound of sliced roast beef
costs $2 and the person slices 3 pounds? If a half pound costs $2, then one pound would cost 2 x $2
or $4. Multiply by the number of pounds needed to get the total: 3 x $4 = 12.
Now try the original problem: If a half pound costs $2.49, then one pound would cost 2 x $2.49 or
$4.98. Multiply by the number of pounds needed to get the total: .53 x $4.98 = $2.6394 or $2.64.
• Read the problem carefully Know the meaning of all words and symbols in the problem.
If a problem can’t be solved right away, divide it into part, and solve one part at a time. A
problem which at first seems difficult becomes easier if you divide it into parts and solve one part at
a time.
Solution: Since positive means greater than 0 and a composite number is a number with more
than two whole number factors, the solution is 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18. For example, 4 has
three factors, 1, 2, and 4.
Example: Last year the Williams family joined a reading club. Mrs. Williams read 20 books.
Their son Jed read 12 books. Their daughter Josie read 14 books and their daughter Julie read 7
books. How many books did the children of Mr. and Mrs. Williams read altogether?
Solution: You do not need to know how many books Mrs. Williams has read since the question
is focusing on the children.
Solution: There is not enough information to solve the problem. You do not know if Josie,
Julie, and Jed are the only children.