TAGUIG CITY UNIVERSITY 1
APPENDIX A
SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRES
Dear Respondents,
The undersigned is conducting a study entitled “STRATEGIC TIME EFFICIENT
EMERGENCY RESPONSE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM USING K- NEAREST
NEIGHBOR ALGORITHM”. You are the part of this endeavor by answering the
questions that follow based on your perception and opinion. The confidentiality of your
responses is assured by the researcher
Very truly yours,
Labrador, Rhoebie Jayriz C.
Manalo, Jeffry S.
Santelices, Arianne Dennise P.
Tabago, Ericka Jane G.
Researchers
Name (Optional):___________________
IT Practitioner
Local Government Officials (Fire Department, Police Department and Barangay)
Residents of Barangay Lower Bicutan
PART II. Evaluation of Strategic Time Efficient Emergency Response Management
System Using K- Nearest Neighbor Algorithm
TAGUIG CITY UNIVERSITY 2
Instruction: Using scale below, please put a check () to indicate your answer on the
following. Only one check is allowed per item.
Legend:
1 – Highly Not Acceptable
2 – Not Acceptable
3 - Acceptable
4 – Highly Acceptable
1. FUNCTIONAL SUITABILITY Rating
Scale
1.1 Functional completeness. Does the 4 3 2 1
system cover all specified task and user
objectives?
1.2 Functional correctness. Can systems 4 3 2 1
provide correct results with the needed
degree of precision?
4 3 2 1
1.3 Functional appropriateness. Does the
systems function facilitate the
accomplishment of specific tasks and
objectives?
Comments/Suggestions:
2. RELIABILITY Rating
Scale
2.1 Maturity. Does the system meet the 4 3 2 1
needs of its users under normal
operations?
2.2 Availability. Can a system be operational 4 3 2 1
and accessible at a time needed for use?
4 3 2 1
2.3 Fault tolerance. Can the system operate
as planned despite the malfunction of
hardware or software existence?
2.4 Recoverability. During a disaster, can 4 3 2 1
the system recover and re-establish the
system to its desired state?
TAGUIG CITY UNIVERSITY 3
Comments/Suggestions:
3. USABILITY Rating
Scale
3.1 Appropriateness recognizability. Can a 4 3 2 1
system be easily recognized by users as an
appropriate product or system to solve their
needs?
3.2 Learnability. Can systems be learnt more 4 3 2 1
easily?
4 3 2 1
3.3 Operability. Can a system be easily operated
and controlled?
3.4 User error protection. Does the system 4 3 2 1
protect users against making errors?
3.5 User interface aesthetics. Does the system 4 3 2 1
user interface look pleasant and satisfactory?
3.6 Accessibility. Can a system be accessed by 4 3 2 1
specific users under specified conditions?
3.7 Supportability. Can a system provide basic 4 3 2 1
operational instructions and hints to its users
when in operation?
3.8 Searchability. Can information be easily 4 3 2 1
searched, found or located with the system?
Comments/Suggestions:
4. PERFORMANCE EFFICIENCY Rating
Scale
4.1 Time Behavior. Can system response 4 3 2 1
and process faster?
4.2 Resource Utilization. Can a system 4 3 2 1
utilize information resources efficiently?
4 3 2 1
4.3 Capacity. Do system parameters meet
their system requirements?
TAGUIG CITY UNIVERSITY 4
Comments/Suggestions:
5. COMPATIBILITY Rating
Scale
5.1 Co-existence. Can the system perform 4 3 2 1
its required operations efficiently while
sharing its environment and information
resources with other products or
systems?
5.2 Interoperability. Can a system interact 4 3 2 1
with other systems or software products?
Comments/Suggestions:
6. SECURITY Rating
Scale
6.1 Confidentiality. Can a system ensure 4 3 2 1
that information resources are accessible
only to those authorized to have access?
6.2 Integrity. Does the system prevent 4 3 2 1
unauthorized access to information
resources or modification of data?
4 3 2 1
6.3 Non-reputation. Can a system prove an
action or an event believed to have taken
place?
6.4 Accountability. Can a system uniquely 4 3 2 1
trace or account for an action or event of
an entity?
4 3 2 1
6.5 Authenticity. Can a system be used to
identify its users and resources?
6.6 Achievability. Does the system preserve 4 3 2 1
and protect its past record for future
references?
Comments/Suggestions:
