Name: ________________________________________________ Grade/Section/Strand: ____________________________ Date: ____________________________
RUBRIC FOR ASSESSING RUBRIC FOR ASSESSING QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH REPORT
Criteria/ Indicators of Limited Developing Acceptable Exemplary
Quality (0-25) (26-50) (51-75) (76-100)
Clarity and Significance of The research questions/objectives are not The research questions/objectives are The research questions/objectives are The research questions/objectives are
the Research clearly and adequately stated; constructs clear but not adequately stated in terms clearly and adequately stated in terms clearly and adequately stated in terms of
Questions/Objectives (20%) and variables of interest are not clearly of the identification of the constructs and of the identification of the constructs the identification of the constructs and
identified. corresponding variables of interest. and corresponding variables of interest. corresponding variables of interest.
The research questions/objectives do not The research questions/objectives The research questions/objectives The research questions/objectives strongly
reflect the interests of the field. It is not somewhat reflect the interests of the field. reflect the interests of the field. reflect the interests of the field. Potential
clear what “contribution” the research will Potential contributions to the field are Potential contributions to the field are contributions to the field are clearly
make in the field. There is no justification articulated but lack clarity and relevance. clearly articulated and relevant. There articulated and relevant. There is strong
for the need for an inquiry into the chosen There is a weak justification for the need is some justification for the need for an justification for the need for inquiry in the
research topic. for an inquiry into the chosen research inquiry into the chosen research topic. chosen research topic based on what is
topic. It is evident that the research makes a known in the field and the need for the
significant contribution to the field in intended knowledge. It is highly evident
either theory or practice. that the research makes a significant
contribution to the field in both theory and
practice.
Appropriateness of The quantitative research method is not The quantitative research method is The quantitative research method is The quantitative research method is well-
Methodology, Sources, and described, and there is no way to appropriate to answer the research appropriate to answer research described and appropriate to answer
Analysis of Data (30%) evaluate whether they provide answers to questions. The specified quantitative questions. The specified quantitative research questions. The specified
the research questions. There is no research design is somewhat appropriate research design is appropriate and quantitative research design is appropriate
clearly specified quantitative research and justified. The sources of data and justified. The sources of data and and well-justified. The sources of data and
design. The description of sources of research instruments used are somehow research instruments used are research instruments used are adequate to
data and research instruments used are adequate to produce the data needed to adequate to produce the data needed produce the data needed to answer the
limited, and it is not clear whether they answer the research questions. The data to answer the research questions. The research questions. The data analysis tools
produce the data needed to answer the analysis tools used are limited in data analysis tools used are used are very appropriate; they generate
research questions. The data analysis generating the needed information to appropriate; they generate the needed the needed information to answer the
tools used are not appropriate and answer the research questions. The information to answer the research research questions. The limitations of the
appropriate for answering the research limitations of the methods are not questions. The limitations of the methods are adequately recognized.
questions. The limitations of the methods recognized. methods are somehow recognized.
are not recognized.
Prepared by: Mc Arthur D. Maravilla, Research Teacher
Criteria/ Indicators of Limited Developing Acceptable Exemplary
Quality (0-25) (26-50) (51-75) (76-100)
Adequacy and Alignment of The results are presented but not well- The results are presented and organized The results are presented and The results are appropriately presented and
Results, Discussion, and organized to answer the research to answer the research questions. They organized to answer the research organized effectively to answer the research
Conclusion with Research questions. There is a lack of connection serve as a basis for the discussion, questions. They serve as an adequate questions. They serve as an adequate basis
Questions/Objectives and between the results, the discussion, and conclusions, and recommendations. basis for the discussion, conclusions, for the discussion, conclusions, and
Methods Used (30%) the conclusion. There is a lack of There is an emergent alignment in the and recommendations. There is some recommendations. There is an evident
alignment in the research questions, research questions, methods, results, and degree of alignment between the alignment in the research questions,
methods, results, and conclusion. conclusion. results and the research questions, methods, results, and conclusion in a
methods, and conclusion. consistent and thorough way.
Communication and The ideas are not communicated clearly The ideas are communicated clearly but The ideas are communicated clearly The ideas are clearly communicated in a
Mechanics (10%) and with several lapses in sentence with several lapses in sentence structure with some degree of coherence in coherent chain of reasoning with clear
structure and grammar. The APA writing and grammar. The APA writing style is reasoning but with minor lapses in sentence structures and no grammatical
style is not applied. There are no not consistently applied. Some references sentence structure and grammar. The errors. The citations and references are
references and relevant appendices. and relevant appendices are missing. APA writing style is applied. appropriately written. The APA writing style
References and relevant appendices is consistently applied. The references and
are included and presented. relevant appendices are included and
correctly presented.
Coherence in Organization The organization of the paper The organization of the paper as a whole The organization and structure of the The organization and structure of the paper
and Structure (10%) as a whole does not follow a logical flow. is logical and apparent, but transitions paper as a whole are somehow logical as a whole are logical and quickly apparent.
Not all parts of the paper fit between paragraphs are not consistently and apparent. The connections among The connections among paragraphs are
the organizational structure. Not all the smooth. Some paragraphs are not paragraphs are articulated. The clearly articulated. The transitions between
parts of the paper are effectively coherent. Some parts of the paper do not transitions between paragraphs are paragraphs are smooth. Every paragraph
integrated. The topic sentences are connect logically. smooth. Most paragraphs make one makes one distinct and coherent point,
missing or unclear in a number of distinct and coherent point, expressed expressed in a clear topic sentence. The
paragraphs. Most parts of the paper do in a clear topic sentence. The sections sections of the paper connect logically and
not connect logically. of the paper connect logically in a persuasively in a coherent chain of
coherent chain of reasoning. reasoning.
Criteria/Indicators of Quality Weight Score Weighted Score
1. Clarity and Significance of the Research Questions/Objectives 0.20
2. Appropriateness of Methodology, Sources, and Analysis of Data 0.30
3. Adequacy and Alignment of Results, Discussion, and Conclusion with Research Questions/Objectives and Methods Used 0.30
4. Communication and Mechanics 0.10
5. Coherence in Organization and Structure 0.10
TOTAL
Prepared by: Mc Arthur D. Maravilla, Research Teacher
Name: ________________________________________________ Grade/Section/Strand: ____________________________ Date: ____________________________
RUBRIC FOR ASSESSING RESEARCH PRESENTATION
1 2 3
Criteria \Scale Poor (0-50) Acceptable (51-75) Very Good (76-100)
Content The presentation content shows a lack of understanding The presentation content shows some degree of The presentation content shows a high level of
(30%) of the research process. The research problem is not understanding of the research process. There is understanding of the research process. The alignment
clearly formulated. There is a lack of alignment of the some evidence of alignment among the research among the research problem, methodology, results,
research problem, methodology, results, and problem, methodology, results, and conclusion. and conclusion is highly evident. The ideas presented
conclusion. The ideas presented contain many The ideas presented contain minor errors/flaws. contain no errors/flaws.
errors/flaws.
Communication, The ideas are not clearly communicated. There is no The ideas are communicated clearly. The The ideas are communicated clearly and fluently. The
Delivery, and evidence of organization. The presenters lack presenters exude some degree of confidence and presenters exude great confidence and make key
Visual Aid confidence and read everything from the text with no organization. They have some eye contact and connections between ideas. The organization and unity
(40%) attempt to establish eye contact and rapport with the rapport with the audience. The presentation slides among the presenters are highly evident. They
audience. The presentation slides have a poor layout have an acceptable layout and design. The maintain rapport with classmates, use stimulating and
and design. The presentation time is not managed. presentation is kept within the allotted time. effective presentation slides, and keep the presentation
within the allotted time.
Ability to Answer The responses did not adequately address the The responses somehow address the questions The responses are clear, concise, and accurate in
Questions and questions or issues raised. The arguments demonstrate or issues raised. The presenters’ arguments show addressing the questions or issues raised. The
Issues Raised a lack of understanding of how the research should be some extent of understanding of the link among arguments are logical and show evidence of
Concerning the done. the research’s basic components processes, but understanding of the research’s basic components and
Study (30 %) with minor flaws. processes.
Criteria/Indicators of Quality Weight Score Weighted Score
1. Content 0.20
2. Communication, Delivery, and Visual Aid 0.30
3. Ability to Answer Questions and Issues Raised Concerning the Study 0.30
TOTAL
Prepared by: Mc Arthur D. Maravilla, Research Teacher
PRESENTATION OF THE RESEARCH PROJECT
The following serves as a guide for the presentation of the research project.
1. Title of the Study (includes the names, grade level, section, and strand of the authors) - 1 slide
2. Introduction (includes the Rationale of the Study and RRL) – 1 to 2 slides
3. Objectives of the Study (includes the Statement of the Problem /Research Questions) – 1 slide
4. Conceptual Framework (optional) – 1 slide
5. Methodology/Materials and Methods (includes the research design, environment, respondents, sources of data/instrument, and data collection procedures) – 1 to 4
slides
6. Results and Discussion – 1 to 5 slides
7. Conclusions – 1 slide
8. Recommendations – 1 slide
9. References – 1 slide
To ensure effective content of the presentation, there must be no more than 20 slides with no more than seven lines per slide and not more than seven words per line. Use a
bulleted list instead of paragraphs, so you don’t have to simply read from the slides.
Each group is allowed to present for 10-15 minutes only.
The presentation schedule is from December 12-15, 2022.
The final written research output will be submitted after the final examination period, tentatively on December 20, 2022.
