Scribd
Upload
23 views2 pages

T Test

The document reports on a study conducted at Valeriano E. Fugoso Memorial High School to determine if there was a significant difference in pretest and posttest scores between a controlled group and a treatment group that used student-focused learning. Table 15 shows that for the pretest scores, the computed t-value of 0.19 was not significant, so the null hypothesis was accepted, indicating no difference before applying the student-focused method. Table 16 shows similarly that for the posttest scores, the computed t-value of 0.21 was also not significant, so again the null hypothesis was accepted, showing no difference after applying the student-focused method.

Uploaded by

orolfo.claire
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
23 views2 pages

T Test

The document reports on a study conducted at Valeriano E. Fugoso Memorial High School to determine if there was a significant difference in pretest and posttest scores between a controlled group and a treatment group that used student-focused learning. Table 15 shows that for the pretest scores, the computed t-value of 0.19 was not significant, so the null hypothesis was accepted, indicating no difference before applying the student-focused method. Table 16 shows similarly that for the posttest scores, the computed t-value of 0.21 was also not significant, so again the null hypothesis was accepted, showing no difference after applying the student-focused method.

Uploaded by

orolfo.claire
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

VALERIANO E.

FUGOSO MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL


Boys Town Complex, Parang, Marikina City
Schools Division Office of Manila

Sub Problem No. 6: Is there a significant difference between the pretest and

posttest results of the student's respondents on the use of Student-Focused Learning in

Organization and Management?

Table 15. Significant Difference of the Pretest Scores of the Two Groups.

Test Mean Computed Verbal Decision


t-value Interpretation
Controlled Treatment

Pre test 3.93 4.06 0.19 Not Accept Ho


Significant

𝐶𝑉α 0.05 = 1.699127 df = 29

Table 15 shows the computed t-value of |0. 19| for Pre test of both Controlled and

Treatment Group verbally interpreted as “Not Significant” for is less than the computed

critical value of “1.699127” at “0.05” level of significance with degree of freedom “29”.

Thus, “accept null hypothesis”. This implied that there was no significant difference

from both respondents before and after applying the Student-focused teaching method.
VALERIANO E. FUGOSO MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
Boys Town Complex, Parang, Marikina City
Schools Division Office of Manila

Table 16. Significant Difference of the Post test Scores of the Two Groups.

Test Mean Computed Verbal Decision


t-value Interpretation
Controlled Treatment

Post test 6.06 7.60 0.21 Not Accept Ho


Significant

𝐶𝑉α 0.05 = 1.699127 df = 29

Table 16 shows the computed t-value of |0. 21| for Post test of both Controlled

and Treatment Group verbally interpreted as “Not Significant” for is less than the

computed critical value of “1.699127” at “0.05” level of significance with degree of

freedom “29”. Thus, “accept null hypothesis”. This implied that there was no significant

difference from both respondents before and after applying the Student-focused

teaching method.

You might also like