5038 Coursework Handbook (For Examination From 2020)
5038 Coursework Handbook (For Examination From 2020)
Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 3
The purpose of this handbook
Introduction
Effective delivery will help learners access the full range of marks available for the coursework element and
facilitate a deeper understanding of the core knowledge within the syllabus.
Once they have worked through the advice in this handbook, teachers should be able to effectively prepare
learners up to the planning phase before learners complete their tasks independently as part of the formal
assessment.
This handbook should be used in conjunction with the Cambridge IGCSE (0600) and Cambridge O Level
(5038) Agriculture syllabuses. Please ensure that you refer to syllabuses dated to the year in which the
examination will be set.
The practice of vocational Agriculture is essentially a mixture of knowledge, understanding and practical
tasks. Learners become more capable in the practical tasks intrinsic to the subject through the hands-on
experience that comes with the practical exercises and project. In turn, the outcomes of this learning can
be assessed, forming a vital part of the balanced and complete assessment of Agriculture at this level.
Coursework is carried out by learners during the course to best meet the requirements prescribed in the
learning content and the assessment objectives in the syllabus.
Benefits:
• Coursework is hands-on as part of the process of ‘learning by doing’. It helps to develop a range of skills,
some of which can be transferred from one learning experience to another, to employment or further
education on leaving school.
• Coursework provides opportunities for learners to develop personal attributes (self-discipline, teamwork,
cognitive and motor skills).
• Teachers share in the assessment process which increases their expertise and professional experience
and increases motivation.
• Learners’ best work may be chosen for assessment.
• Learners are motivated by practical work helping to enhance their understanding of the more theoretical
parts of the syllabus.
• Coursework tasks can be adapted to meet the needs and ability of the learners and the resources of the
Centre.
• Coursework therefore provides a more representative view of the learner’s achievement rather than
relying entirely on external written examination.
Paper 2 assesses practical and organisational skills and these abilities essential to the study of agriculture
that are not suitably measured by examinations on theory.
The coursework consists of at least four discrete practical exercises and one practical investigative
project which takes the form of a report. At least one of the practical exercises is to be carried out in each
of the four terms of study (i.e. they are to be spread evenly over the course). The purpose of this is to
enhance the learning and understanding of the subject through its application and practice.
Teachers should take note that there is a greater weighting of 70% for skills (including handling information,
problem solving, practical, experimental and investigative skills) than for knowledge and understanding.
Teachers’ schemes of work and the sequence of learning activities should reflect this balance, so that the
aims of the syllabus may be met, and the candidates are fully prepared for the assessment.
Paper 2
Careful selection of suitable practical exercises and investigative project topics will help to ensure that the
learning outcomes for the related sections of the syllabus are enhanced. The quality of learning and teaching
will benefit from the effective integration of practical work into the Centre’s scheme of work.
The teacher should make sure that the proposals of the learners are safe. This should not be used as an
excuse to avoid or reduce practical work. For example, the use of a rotavator or mechanical tiller could be
seen as potentially risky. However its use is also very relevant to the study of agriculture, an excellent skill
for practical assessment and highly motivating for learners, who enjoy developing competence in using such
machinery. Thus, the teacher’s role is not to prevent learners from doing things because they are not safe,
but to find ways of doing things that are safe, so that learners can be enabled to enjoy the course and be
assessed doing interesting and engaging activities.
In agriculture there are many potential risks and hazards which must be closely monitored,
including:
Another area of health and safety that should be carefully monitored by teachers is that of the welfare of
animals. Candidates should ensure the provision of good basic care, adequate clean water, food and bedding
for livestock and avoid any procedures that might alarm, hurt or harm them. Furthermore, it is a requirement
of the Practical Investigation Report that candidates provide evidence that they have ‘understood relevant
principles’; clearly health and safety forms one of these principles. For this reason it is vital that good
practice in health and safety should be included by learners within their project plan, throughout their
practical work and in their explanations in the report.
The practical investigation is marked out of a total of 30 marks with 5 marks allocated for each of the
6 assessment criteria.
The total mark awarded to a candidate is the sum of the marks for all the exercises (a mark out of 60) and for
the practical investigation report (a mark out of 30).
The mark schemes are in 3 bands, arranged in ascending order so that each band describes a more assured
performance than the one before it.
Read and annotate the work and then make a ‘best fit’ judgement as to which band to place it in. Very often
you may see qualities that fit more than one band, so always use two bands at least and come to a decision
between them. You can trade off the strengths and weaknesses in the work against the criteria in the
different bands. Lastly, give a specific mark from your chosen band.
If all the criteria in a band fit your judgement, award the highest mark for that band and check the band
above, just in case. If most of the criteria fit your judgement, award a mark nearer the bottom and check the
band below, just in case.
When you assess all of your own Centre’s coursework assignments, place them in rank order, and award
the marks accordingly, paying special attention to the borderlines. Try, where possible, to differentiate
between assignments that lie within the same band.
Be careful not to crowd many of your candidates onto a single mark, particularly the bottom mark of a band.
The graph of your distribution of marks should be smooth rather than have points like a pagoda. Where an
excessive number of candidates are placed on one mark, an external moderator will rarely agree that the
work of each is of the same quality.
1.6 Annotation
It is essential that there is proof of the teacher’s judgement (in the form of annotations) on every assignment
or stated clearly on an additional sheet. There should be a comment on the strengths and weaknesses at
the end of each piece. This annotation is crucial for moderation as it helps to explain the marks that the
teacher has given. Annotation should clearly relate to the assessment criteria. (In addition, the Individual
Candidate Record Card for the Practical Investigation has a space for comment.)
Criteria for the standard of achievement likely to have been shown by candidates awarded Grades A, C, and
F are shown below. The standard of achievement required for the award of Grade C, include the criteria for
Grade F. Similarly, the standard of achievement required for the award of Grade A includes the criteria for
Grade C.
It is expected that candidates will demonstrate background knowledge of, and/or an increased depth of
knowledge, in the physical, chemical and mathematical concepts and processes listed in sections 6.1 and
6.2 of the syllabus.
Potential learning tasks early in the course to prepare for the practical exercises and project:
Areas where learners need to be well prepared as they tend to find these aspects more
challenging:
You should consider the following key points when setting the practical exercise tasks and the
investigation.
Task setting
1. The learners should have an opportunity to practice and gain a skill before being assessed in it.
2. The assessment should be based on the principal of positive achievement.
3. Learners should be given an opportunity to demonstrate what they understand and can do.
4. The work must allow learners to respond at the levels given in the assessment criteria.
5. Work should be differentiated for the learner. Not all such work needs to contribute to formal
assessment (some can form as a pathway for learning).
6. The practical exercises need to be spread over four terms. The investigation may involve more than one
term and practical exercises can be incorporated into the investigation.
7. Assessments should normally be undertaken by the person or teacher responsible for teaching the
learners.
8. Practical exercises should provide opportunities for learners to demonstrate all five of the skill areas
specified in the assessment criteria (see Section 2.3.2 of this handbook). It is recognised that assessing
all five areas may not, in every case, be possible if a practical is being targeted at a particular main skill. It
is not essential to test all candidates on the same exercises.
9. It is important to make sure that all practical exercises are sufficiently complex to meet the assessment
criteria.
10. Teachers should be prepared to take advantage of local opportunities to assess their learners as they
help in the community, e.g. with large-scale harvesting, drainage or irrigation schemes, fencing, land
reclamation, etc.
11. When assessing group-based work, the teacher must ensure that the individual contribution of each
candidate can be assessed.
12. Assessment for some skills will not always generate written work from the candidate; such work can
simply be observed by the teacher.
13. Other skills will generate practical work and this will produce evidence for moderation.
It will be more difficult to deliver the syllabus without easy access to a school farm or a friendly local farm
willing to accommodate your learners.
A school garden or small plot of land would allow most practical activities to take place and allow
demonstration of most practical skills. Local visits might be required to allow access to livestock and to allow
learners to perform some practical skills.
Some Centres might find it useful to share resources or have projects where livestock can be borrowed and
kept for short periods in school so avoiding the complications of long-term care and supervision of livestock.
Poultry are one of the easiest animals to manage in this way. Short-term loan or short lifetime breeding or
rearing-to-slaughter programmes could also be used.
Animals such as cattle, sheep and goats that are allowed to roam freely on communal grounds can be used
for practical exercises such as vaccination, dosing for worms or hoof-checking with the permission of their
legal owner.
• an area for both laboratory-based and field-based agricultural practical work which is secure and offers
protection from animals and human activity
• an outdoor teaching area and experimental garden, ideally with small individual beds
• access to water and shade
• an area suitable for propagation and for growing plant seedlings
• somewhere secure to store chemicals and agrochemicals in accordance with local and national
regulations
• somewhere safe and secure to store tools and machinery
• a safe area within a laboratory environment where learners will be able to leave their experiments for
long-term observations and recording.
Fieldwork is a valuable way to enhance the understanding of agricultural practices and to develop the skills
required for the coursework in this qualification.
The amount of time required to deliver the course in a laboratory needs to be considered when constructing
a scheme of work.
Some laboratory time is required to carry out certain practical exercises and to support the development
of the practical investigation. The amount of time required depends on the approach and flexibility of the
teachers involved.
4. energy transfer/conversion
Practically speaking, learners need to be able to perform practical scientific tasks such as: weigh and
measure with appropriate scales, rulers or weigh-bands; use sieves and mix soils and compost; measure
soil pH with soil indicator; be able to heat and dry soil and burn humus and carry out plant investigations
including observations and experiments on photosynthesis and transpiration.
1. Timings of the year; how much teaching and practical time will be available.
2. When set holidays occur.
3. The number of learners in the group and the rough areas of practical study they wish to pursue.
4. When school/local farm facilities will be available, or community activities occur, that can be used for
practical experience throughout the course.
5. When the growing season/breeding season falls in relation to all the above timings.
6. When laboratory facilities will be available throughout the course.
7. Work out animal and plant-related practical tasks according to those generic areas you want everyone to
cover (perhaps groups in a rotating system to access facilities?) and add in the individual requirements of
learner choices.
8. When equipment requirements will be identified and any necessary purchases made.
• work out when the theoretical work can be carried out in class and in the lab around the
growing/breeding seasons
• coordinate with Mathematics (especially graphs) and Science lessons that cover the required skills
• arrange meeting to set practical work, go through the requirements of the assessment criteria to focus
tasks
• consider whether practical investigations chosen by learners can be supported by some of the practical
exercises
• try to identify investigations using crops which have a short lifecycle to fit within your time availability
– choose plants or animal investigations where candidates are able to achieve positive success,
e.g. radish or potatoes grow well, and crops such as potatoes or tomatoes are good at being pest
resistant and are therefore more likely to succeed
– encourage investigations where at least some of the data is quantitative and easy to collect
– give qualitative data a numerical value to allow ease of analysis
• arrange regular meetings of involved staff to review the delivery of coursework and plan ‘next steps’
• include all dates identified for the above activities to take place on a yearly schedule and share this with
involved staff and other stakeholders.
12 Cambridge IGCSE and O Level Agriculture
Section 2: The practical exercises
Centres are free to carry out more than four practical exercises, submitting only those they consider to be
the best four.
In addition, they may be organised in such a way that (up to a maximum of) three practical exercises can
be used as part of the Practical Investigation itself. For example, a candidate might investigate the effect of
fertilizer on the growth of cabbages, involving:
However, the incorporation of practical exercises into the investigation is entirely optional and at the
teacher’s discretion. If this is done, these three practical exercises may have been done in the same term
of study, or perhaps, as in the example above, spread over just two terms. This means that, to fulfil the
requirement for the practical exercises to be spread over four terms, two (in the example above) or three
further practical exercises will be necessary.
Given the choice of investigation topic, the abilities of each individual candidate and the resources/facilities
available to the school, the teacher will need to consider the most effective way to meet the syllabus
requirements in the case of each candidate and in the time available.
A key part of the evidence will be records generated by teacher observation of the skills being
demonstrated. However, tick-sheets and teacher-dated records merely documenting the practical tasks
that have been carried out do not provide suitable evidence for moderation since such evidence does not
show the candidate performing the task. Authentic evidence showing that the candidate has carried out
the practical tasks, and when this work was done, is required. The preferred forms of evidence are those
generated by the candidate and those showing the candidate carrying out the work. Photographs or video
clips of the candidate doing the task, taken either by the teacher or the candidate, are partuclarly useful
forms of evidence.
Evidence generated by the learner may encompass a range of sources. A diary is good practice and part
of normal agricultural work. Candidates should be encouraged to make observations relevant to the task.
Photographic evidence is useful and best annotated by the learner. Photographs or video clips also prove to
be highly motivational as well as good evidence of performance. Reflective comments on the activity/task/
exercise could include a brief, constructive, critical comment by the learner, either in the form of annotations
on other evidence or as a record of reflection. Teachers can also annotate (in red ink) learner-generated
evidence to support the mark awarded.
Both learner and teacher-generated evidence for both parts of the coursework should make up each
individual candidate’s portfolio. It is important to do this for every candidate so that whichever samples
are selected for the external moderation sample they will contain all relevant information and evidence. In
addition candidates and teachers should put in the same effort to collect and organise each portfolio in the
interests of fairness and effective standardisation and moderation.
The kinds of evidence for internal and external moderation can take many forms, such as the examples
given below.
Continuous assessment entails keeping a record for each candidate, showing the operations carried out
and the marks awarded. The aim should be to produce portfolios that indicate the task, its descriptors
and related mark scheme, the way the candidate understood it and carried it out including his/her own
reflections (e.g. photo-diaries with comments) and any records of data collected. The key issues in such
evidence are:
• validity – the evidence must directly relate to the criteria being assessed
• authenticity – the evidence must have been collected at the time that the activity was being carried out
• reliability – the evidence must have been collected in such a way that the moderator can be certain
that the candidate actually carried out each activity successfully.
The complete schedule of all marks will need to be submitted either to the ministry in the candidate’s home
country or to Cambridge, as appropriate. The moderator will need to see evidence that the teacher has
marked fairly and consistently.
When submitting evidence, it will be found most convenient to use a USB flash stick, a CD or DVD. Some
evidence will exist electronically already (e.g. photos, video, spreadsheets, PowerPoint presentations and
word processed document, but evidence that is in hard copy can readily be scanned or photographed to
digitise it for submission. Set the scanner to a low resolution (75 or 100 ppi/dpi) and save the images as
JPEGS optimised for smaller files to give acceptable results and files that are not too large.
If material must be submitted as hard copy, please include only material that is relevant, necessary and
authentic.
It is important that the practical exercises are first taught as part of the delivery of the relevant syllabus area.
It should not be assumed that the learners know how to apply the skills that are being tested. First, learners
must be taught how to apply the skills. Then, and only then, should they be allowed to demonstrate their
mastery of the skill, whilst being assessed.
The school must ensure sufficient time for the practical work and clearly identify such activities in their
scheme of work. It is best not to consider the investigation topic until sufficient theory and related topics
have been taught to accommodate in-depth study, linking different aspects of agricultural theory to the
investigation.
Ideally, Centres’ practical tasks should differentiate over the full ability range. Some practical exercises do
differentiate, for example long-term work like the feeding and maintenance of chickens or monitoring plant
growth. These are more demanding than, for instance, a lab-based soil settlement exercise. The former
gives opportunities for testing all five assessment criteria so helping differentiation, the latter does not. This
exercise, however, could be used with a worksheet that offered options and extension work to test initiative
and enable access to the higher marks.
1. Responsibility the ability to assume responsibility for the task in hand, and to work from given
instructions without detailed supervision and help
2. Intiative the ability to cope with problems arising in connection with the task, to see what
needs to be done and to take effective action
3. Technique the ability to tackle a practical task in a methodical, systematic way, and to handle
tools skillfully and to good effect
4. Perseverance the ability to see a task through to a successful conclusion with determination
and sustained effort
5. Quality the ability to attend to detail, so that the work is well finished and is well
presented
• Shows little regard for safety procedures, A candidate who generally needs
even when told support, guidance and frequent
0–1 reminders about safety but who does
attempt the given task.
• Shows some responsibility for the work
• Performs practical work in a rushed and Poor finish, incomplete work, (e.g. if
superficial way and shows little concern seeds sown, not all would germinate).
for the finished product
Work not complete, basic.
Some suggestions to enhance the evidence provision and learning opportunities for practical exercises
as stand alone exercises, or exercises which could be incorporated into the investigation topic, are shown
below. Please note that any errors in these candidate submissions have not been corrected.
Having caught the ewe I decided to get Rob to hold her while I clipped her rear hoof which was quite badly
overgrown and needed spraying with antibiotic.
2.4.2 Using tools and machinery effectively with regard to safety to carry out
routine agriculture task within the centres practical area farm or garden.
This is me after starting the school tractor and collecting some manure from the pig’s house. Before I
started the tractor I checked the oil and water. I also checked the PTO cover was in place. The tractor was
running quite poorly and had been slow and hard to start, I reported this to the farm manager.
The farm manager checking my driving skills and ensuring I knew how to operate the tractor in a safe way.
Ploughing was quite difficult as the tractor started to wheel spin quite easily making it hard to keep in a
straight line.
Task reflection.
This was a fun task. I prepared a risk assessment and I learnt how to start and drive the tractor. Check it was
safe to use and carry out two practical activities. I had problems with starting the tractor and it kept stalling
so I reported this to Mr Bert the Farm manager.
Collecting manure from the pigs was good for saving time as some times we do it with wheel barrows. I
made one mistake allowing the others to throw their forks onto the manure rather than laying them in safely.
It was not easy because the tractor was difficult to start and kept stalling on me not my fault . Reversing the
trailer was quite difficult but I started to master it. I really needed more time to get more skilled at this .
Ploughing was really hard the tractor was working better but the soil was really too wet . I told sir but he
said we had to do our best because we had exams next week.
Mr Bert told me later he had found the trouble with the tractor a blockage in the fuel line . He thanked me
for reporting it before it became a real problem.
The above is an example from a UK Centre. The task reflection element enhances the thinking
about the processes involved and the skills required as related in the taught theory topics.
I took each sample 50 m further in land and took 3 samples of soil at each point scraping off the top 10 mm
of soil and mixing all 3 samples and then put 20 mm of soil into the barium sulfate tube.
Me looking after my water buffalo I am allowing it to graze the stubble from our village rice crop. Each day
I check his feet and coat and lead him out giving him as much line as possible. I keep him away from the
cows and moving to see he gets the best of the re growth on the old rice crop.
It can be seen that when moving the buffalo I have to be quite positive and keep the lead short and assert
myself with the beast.
I normally sort the buffalo out before school and move them when I get back at 1300 hrs . This activity is
easier than cutting the grasses from the roadsides and between fields which I do when the rice crop is
growing.
This allows assessment away from the school and in positive ways, supporting community
activity.
Initiative
• Levelling of the seed bed and raising up of the sides of the seed bed
• Breaking of crumbs to a fine tilth
Technique
• Measuring correct amount of fertilizer
• Digging technique
Perseverance
• Willingness to complete task within the given time
• Level of concentration at different stages of seedbed making
Quality
• The quality of the work done, i.e. the seed bed being properly
measured with regard to width and length, the levelling of the seed
bed and the mixing in of the fertilizers
Initiative
• Ability to solve unexpected problems (removing roots and rocks, etc)
• Filling in of hole after the exercise
• Identification of soil layers in terms of colour and/or organic content
Technique
• Correct method of measuring
• Handling of tools
Perseverance
• Positive attitude towards work
• Ability to complete work within a given time
Quality
• Neatness of drawing
• Appearance of hole
Written task • Why do we need to dip the teats in iodine after milking?
• Draw a graph to show milk production for each cow
• Why is it necessary to keep the cow calm during milking?
Initiative
• Washing of hands and teats/udder before milking
• Cleaning of tools and safe storage of tools
Technique
• Handling of cows, i.e. tying the legs before milking (safety precaution)
• Milking techniques
• Cleaning of udder
• Dipping teats in iodine
Perseverance
• All parts of the milking process completed successfully
Quality
• Graphs correctly plotted and drawn
• Cleanliness of the milk
• Accurate weighing
Written task • Identify the materials which you will need to carry out this task
• What effect has slope on the flow of water?
Initiative
• Identification of the correct tools and materials
• Ability to detect problems and solve them, e.g. obstacles such as
rocks, tree roots, etc.
• Ability to vary the depth of the trench to encourage water flow
• Selection of proper tools to use
Technique
• Handling of tools in the proper way
• Digging skills to allow the flow of water
• Ability to join pipes together
Perseverance
• All required practical tasks and written work to be completed
• Positive attitude towards work given
Quality
• Accurate measuring of distance
• Correct filling of the tap and pipe
• Appearance of the area on completion
• No leakage found
Instructions to the • Transplant healthy seedlings after watering and when they have
learner developed about four leaves and are approximately 10–12cm in height
• Mark out the planting distances and depths, which should be 5cm
deep and 90cm apart
• Pack the seedlings carefully into a wheelbarrow or head pan and take
to the garden
• Carefully place the seedlings in the holes
• Irrigate immediately and provide shade
Written task • Why were the seedlings nursed before being transplanted?
• Suggest two reasons why some of the seeds did not germinate in the
nursery?
• Give two reasons or advantages of irrigating the seedlings after
transplantation
• What caused the wilting of some transplanted seedlings?
• Suggest two reasons for maintaining planting distances in the garden
• Why should young seedlings be shaded after transplanting?
Initiative
• Solving problems without help, e.g. how to carry the seedlings
• Method of applying manure or humus in each hole
• Designing and making strong and suitable shading
Technique
• Proper handling of trowel whilst digging the holes for transplanting
• Correct carrying and removal of seedlings from the nursery; putting
them in the planting hole with balls of earth clinging to them
• Careful irrigation to prevent damaging the tender leaves and prevent
waterlogging
Perseverance
• Required number of seedlings transplanted
• Irrigation carried out
• Shade constructed
• Worksheet complete (marking)
Quality
• Accuracy of planting distances and straight row planting
• Cleaning the area
• Plant survival rate
Initiative
• Selection of the correct tools
• Arrangement of tools for ease of carrying out work
• Detecting the degree of heat of the iron
• Application of water on the branding iron to cool it
Technique
• Handling of the cows during actual branding
• Handling of tools skilfully
• Working with accuracy (right position and correct force)
Perseverance
• Participation in all tasks
• Patience and willingness to complete the task
• Cleaning up after work
• Inspection of the animal over the next three to four days
Quality
• Speed of sorting calves into position
• Quality of mark/brand made
• Visibility of brand numbers
In the syllabus, Section 5.2.4 lays out the framework within which the practical investigation is to be
carried out. The purpose of the project is that learners will develop skills in investigation which will then be
assessed against Assessment Objective AO3: experimental skills and investigations. There is a 1000 word
limit for the project and this limit should be adhered to tightly. Please note that any work that is beyond
110% of the total required (i.e. 1100 words in this case), will be ignored for assessment purposes.
3.2 Principles
In the syllabus, Section 5.2.5 explains the sort of work that is required for the project to test investigatory
skills.
This syllabus section sets some important principles for the work, which are discussed below.
• The investigation should be the work of the individual candidate; group-work is not suitable and any
attempt to use group-work will inevitably penalise individual candidates.
• The research part of the project should be practical in nature, involving measurement and observation
by the individual candidate which will produce primary data on which the conclusions can be based.
Secondary research, such as research on the internet or from books, should not be the major source
of data for the investigation, although it may be very useful in putting the preparations and drawing of
conclusions in context.
• This should be a major piece of work. The syllabus specifies that it should take about 3½ hours of work
in class along with associated homework time.
• This should be a good opportunity for the candidates to learn independently, guided and supported by
the teacher, working as a facilitator. The role of the teacher should thus be encouraging the candidate
rather than directing.
• The investigation should be prepared for properly – candidates will need to learn how to do investigatory
work before they can do the project successfully.
• The project should be on a topic chosen by the candidate where possible. Some candidates may need
considerable support to enable the selection of a suitable topic. Other candidates may be unable to
make appropriate choices themselves. Such candidates will need to have suitable problems selected for
them, as permitted by the syllabus.
• This investigation should be based on a problem that the learner sets out to solve. This should be
expressed as a question or as a hypothesis. Simpler projects will tend to be based on questions. More
sophisticated learners will prefer to express their predictions and expectations in terms of a hypothesis.
Such hypotheses will involve the relationship between an identified independent variable and an
identified dependent variable. Such candidates will recognise, that to make a fair test, they should
control other environmental variables as far as possible.
• Field studies may involve a type of experiment (naturalistic experiment). In this case, natural variation in
a variable, such as trampling or soil moisture, is used as the independent variable. Control of variables
such as soil pH and temperature is achieved by measuring such variables in order to confirm that there
are no significant differences between them at sites chosen to give suitable values for the independent
variable. This will ensure that such field studies produce worthwhile numerical data for analysis. Field
studies that produce observations alone are much more difficult to analyse effectively.
• Some candidates will peform experiments in environments which can be better controlled (such as pots
in a glasshouse or chickens in several different runs). These will also work best if conducted in the form
used by scientific investigators (as described above) rather than as purely observational studies, so that
candidates are able to make worthwhile analyses and conclusions.
3.4 Dealing with problems that do not get solved and hypotheses
that turn out to be incorrect
The syllabus offers guidance on how to support learners who do not solve the problems that they set out
to solve. In such a case, the role of the teacher is to provide encouragement to the learners to view this as
a learning experience and to report what they attempted and why it did not work as expected, in order that
they can be fairly assessed. It is expected that a well-written and well-explained project that did not succeed
in solving the problem intended will gain high marks.
Other learners may come up with data which contradicts the hypothesis that they set out with. In other
words, they do provide a solution to the problem, but it is not the solution that they were expecting.
Rather than trying to change or manipulate the data to fit the original hypothesis, learners should explain
the results in terms of challenging the original hypothesis. Learners should be aware that professional
agricultural scientists often find results that do not support their hypotheses, and that such results are the
first steps towards making new, better hypotheses. Learners might be encouraged to consider suggesting
new hypotheses that could be tested and alternative measurements that could be made if they had time.
It should be clear to learners that such research is an ongoing process of discovery, and that finding a
hypothesis to be untrue can lead them to more suggestions and questions. As an assessor, the teacher is
interested in the processes that the learner uses rather than the success or otherwise of their hypotheses.
The teacher needs to think carefully about the timing of the course especially in relation to the growing
season and holidays to ensure that the syllabus content relating to the investigation topics is adequately
covered.
Candidates should be encouraged to take specific responsibility for a section of data collected. This can be
highlighted in tables and their role in this aspect of the work should be clearly indicated.
Animal investigations may also require a collaborative approach to obtain sufficient useful data and ensure
safe and high-quality animal husbandry skills.
Teachers will need to be aware of the timings of such exercises in order to achieve an even distribution
of practical work over the four terms and to make sure that each individual learner carries out sufficient
practical work and has sufficient opportunities for individual practical assessment.
Similarly, where decisions are made about which data can and cannot be relied upon and which data
should be included in the analysis, there should be clear explanation and reasoning so that the reader can
understand why data was included or excluded in further analysis.
Once the meaning of the data has become clear to the learners, indicating to them whether the data
supports the hypothesis or does not, the learner should clearly explain the reasons behind the conclusions
drawn. This should include explaining how the conclusion was reached, i.e. the specific reasons why the
information obtained in the study lead the learner to draw a particular conclusion. It should also involve the
learner attempting to explain the reasons for the data found.
The learner’s conclusions will need to summarise the extent to which their results support or refute their
original hypothesis. Learners will need to include facts and information from background research to help
explain their results. This may be in terms of a question originally posed, or may involve a statement about
the relationship between the independent variable and dependent variable.
Agriculture is a commercial enterprise, and thus cost-effectiveness is a key issue in agriculture. Learners
should be encouraged to think about the economic impact of the information that they have obtained, and to
give an assessment of the potential impact of their findings on cost-effective agriculture.
However it also makes clear that learners who need more support should be given more support.
This will be reflected in the assessment, so those learners who are able to be more autonomous in getting
on with the work without significant support from the teacher, will get higher marks than the learner who
has had difficulty understanding the requirements of the project during the preparatory work beforehand,
and needed support at each step of the journey.
The timing of the various practical exercises and projects is crucial to ensure that all of the learners
acquire the skills to the best of their ability in the time available. The learners must also meet the syllabus
requirements in terms of both the range and extent of the work they carry out and the evidence they
submit. Practical exercises should be carried out over a sufficient number of terms. It is the teacher’s
responsibility to make sure that the learners have both the time and the opportunity to fulfil the assessment
criteria as successfully as capability and development allows.
It makes clear that there are certain sections that must be present: Title, Contents, Introduction,
Methodology, Presentation of data findings, Findings and conclusions. Every report should be prepared to
the same high standard irrespective of whether it is in the moderation sample required by Cambridge. The
exam board could ask for any, or all, of the other projects at any time up until the point where the regulations
allow them to be either disposed of or returned to candidates. This is well after the results have been
released and any reports and re-marks completed.
It would be sensible if the title included a clear indication of the question or hypothesis that underlies the
project. The title must be visible from the front of the project along with the candidate’s name, candidate
number, school/Centre name and Centre number, so that the assessor and moderators can immediately see
the nature of the project report without having to open the covers. This means that it is unwise to put the
projects into any kind of folder as it makes them unreasonably bulky and difficult to transport and means the
moderator has to open each one to find out who wrote it and what it is about.
The contents list must have page numbers, which means, of course, that the pages of the report must be
numbered clearly. The section titles mentioned in the syllabus should be clearly indicated in the contents
list, along with any other sections included. The assessor and moderators need to find it easy to navigate
around the report and this means that any tables, charts, graphs, diagrams and illustrations should also be
detailed in the contents list and provided with titles and page numbers.
The purpose of the introduction is to summarise the plans for the investigation.
• This means that it should contain a statement of the question or hypothesis underlying the investigation
plus a brief outline of the way it is to be answered or tested. Key dates indicating when the actual
practical work was carried out and the location in which it took place should also be included.
• It should be remembered that the word limit for the whole report is only 1000 words, so the introduction
should be concise if the word limit is not to be exceeded.
• Any acknowledgements should also be included in the introduction (for example, if laboratory
technicians helped get apparatus ready or if a local farmer permitted the work to be carried out on their
land with their livestock. The acknowledgements do not contribute to the word count, so that if there are
a number of people or organisations to acknowledge, this will not cause unfairness to the candidate.
• Any secondary sources of information used, (textbooks, websites, etc.) should also be included here in
a resource list or bibliography, (which also does not contribute to the word count). Such references are
vital for indicating the source of ideas and methods selected by the learner. They suggest reasons and
explanations for decisions made and the extent to which a learner researched other investigations in the
past. They also indicate that the learner has checked the validity of other work.
The methodology section of such a report is often called ‘The Methods’ by scientists. It refers to the
ways in which the investigation was carried out. The learner needs to describe, concisely, how any
planning or pre-sampling was carried out, how the data was collected, and how any measurements (e.g. of
temperature, pH or other variables) were made, and how any problems in obtaining data were overcome.
(For example, if apparatus was made or adapted to allow measurements to be made). The section will
include any numerical and graphical methods used, for example in calculating percentage yields of different
crops or cost-effectiveness of a treatment regime. If any statistical methods are used to simplify data, such
as standard deviation, standard error, mean, median, quartiles, etc., these should be outlined as well.
The presentation of data findings section should indicate the results. This should include tables of raw
data, not re-written but presented exactly as they were recorded during the investigation. Not all such tables
need to be presented but a sample will give the assessor and moderator a clear picture of the likely reliability
of the data. Such data tables do not form part of the word count.
The purpose of any other tables, graphs, charts and illustrations that might be included here is simple. In
deciding whether or not a particular presentation should be included, the learner needs to ask themselves
just one simple question: “Does this table/graph/chart/illustration help the reader to understand what the
data means?” If the answer to this is no, then the learner should not include the this table/graph/
chart/illustration. If the answer is YES, then the learner could usefully include the this table/graph/
chart/illustration, if something else does not show the same thing better.
All such presentations of data should be clearly labelled with a title, making clear what is being shown and
what it means. Learners should take care that obvious things such as graph axes and units of measurement
are suitably labelled to avoid careless loss of marks. Ideally, candidates should annotate their graphs and
charts to identify anomalies or relevant points of interest.
The section below provides clear and reliable advice regarding the use of graphs which are so important
in presenting the evidence. It was developed by a practicing Agriculture teacher delivering the Cambridge
syllabus and is designed to be given directly to learners to assist them in constructing their investigation
reports.
• The independent variable will be plotted on the x-axis (horizontal axis) and
the dependent variable plotted on the y-axis (vertical axis).
• Each axis will be labelled with the physical quantity and the appropriate SI
unit, e.g. time / min.
• The graph is the whole diagrammatic presentation. It may have one or
several curves plotted on it.
• Curves and lines joining points on the graph should be referred to as ‘curves’.
• Points on the curve should be clearly marked as crosses (x) or encircled dots (). If a further curve is
included, vertical crosses (+) may be used to mark the points.
Pie charts – may be used when you want to draw attention to relative
amounts or percentages. It works well with percentages between 10 and
90%, but bar charts are better for smaller percentages.
These should be drawn with the sectors in rank order, largest first, beginning
at ‘noon’ and proceeding clockwise. Pie charts should preferably contain no
more than six sectors.
Bar charts – these are drawn when one of the variables is not numerical or
has discrete values, e.g. number of eggs of different colours, or frequency of
occurrence of nests with different numbers of eggs.
They should be made up of narrow blocks of equal width that do not touch.
Histograms – are the most rarely required kind of graph. They are to summarise
distribution data visually. They can only be used when it is possible to calculate
a frequency for a series of classes of a continuous numerical variable, e.g. the
frequency of chickens with different masses or frequency of occurrence of
stems of different lengths. The blocks should be touching.
This advice on graphs should be made available to the learners and should be incorporated into the delivery
of the theory content of the course so that learners become familiar with their use. This could also be
an opportunity for close cooperation with the mathematics department within the school/college so that
delivery can be coordinated across the two subjects. The use of graphs and charts should form a valuable
and natural part of reporting on the investigation and practical exercises. It should be understood as the
most effective way of demonstrating the significance of results to others, i.e. illustrating what the results
actually mean.
A frequent weakness in coursework evidence occurs when large amounts of data have been collected and
presented appropriately by learners but they have failed to use the information in their analysis. Encouraging
selection of appropriate graphs, coupled with annotation of the actual graphs and charts will encourage
productive use of the information which has been collected and presented.
The findings and conclusions section of the report should be a few short paragraphs and should bring the
whole piece of work up close to the 1000 word limit without exceeding it. This is often the longest single
section in the report, containing a few hundred words of concise explanation of what the results actually
show that is explaining what the results actually mean. The extent to which the results succeed or fail to
answer the original question or test the original hypothesis should be included. Learners should not be
frightened of explaining that they did not succeed in what they set out to do but learned some other things
instead, even if that is only to learn how to do such a project better next time. Limitations in the methods
and in the results (such as problems with reliability or with control of variables to make it a fair test) are
worth mentioning. This allows learners to make suggestions on how to improve methods and also how to
make results more reliable through use of a fairer test.
If the teacher or anyone else gave assistance and help during the work, this should be described – this
description does not contribute to the word count. It is vital that this be included so that the assessor and
moderators can make a fair judgement on how much of the work in the report is the candidate’s own work.
Marking Criteria
Criteria Marks
available
1. The selection of relevant questions (hypothesis) for the investigation 5
2. The planning of the investigation and the principles on which it is based 5
3. The handling of evidence 5
4. The ability to make deductions from the evidence or the data acquired 5
5. The ability to recognise limitations of the investigation 5
6. Description of practical, presentation, layout and originality (candidate’s own work) 5
The tables that follow show the further breakdown of the marking criteria for the investigation report, as
they are stated in the syllabus. Alongside each criterion below you will find a commentary to assist teachers,
assessors and moderators. This gives an indication of the standard you should expect to see in a candidate’s
work at each level for each skill area.
• Relevant questions (hypothesis) selected 4 Candidate has the idea and chooses
without guidance, appropriate but poorly
the topic without help but not very
expressed
clearly explained.
• Results presented neatly and clearly in a 3 Some inaccurate graphs or charts and
table, inappropriate method of analysis
not always in the most appropriate
chosen, graphs and/or histograms
form or scale, stome poorly labelled.
inaccurate and incorrectly presented
• Tasks carried out with considerable help, 0 Candidate given help but not able to
inaccurate observations and records
record or use the results/findings in a
worthwhile way.
• One or two limitations identified but no 1 Mentions at least one limitation but
assessments or improvements given
with little or no explanation (e.g. we
only had a few plants).
0 No evidence
• Description of the aims and nature of the 3 Gives aims and objectives; not
investigation given; lacking in either neat
presented in a very professional way
presentation or layout not as required by
but with signs of attempting to use
the syllabus; candidate’s own work
appropriate headings.
• Outline only of the aims and nature of 1 Aims lack detail, simple statement;
the investigation; poorly presented;
layout not clear and as specified,
layout not as required by the syllabus;
substantial lack of page numbers,
candidate’s own work
content, sub-headings, naming or
numbering of charts and tables,
photographs or illustrations not really
linked to the report.
Each teacher involved in the assessment should put the folders of their marking group together, placing the
Coursework Assessment Summary Form first with all of the marks carefully transferred from each individual
candidate. The candidates should be listed in candidate index number order to allow for easy transfer of
marks onto the computer-printed coursework mark sheet (MS1) later on. The MS1 should be sent to the
examinations officer in each Centre in early October.
Work should, if possible, be submitted in the form of an electronic folder which can be put onto a memory
stick/flash drive or CD. The electronic folder is the most convenient and secure format as it allows copies to
be kept, avoiding expensive photocopying and postage for heavy paperwork. However, if you are unable to
send your submissions electronically you can still send them as hard copy folders. We advise that you keep
a copy of all work.
The coursework must be the candidates’ own work. Where shared data has been used it must be clear
what the individual candidate contributed to the collection of that evidence and it is vital that such data
sharing is acknowledged. The analysis and all further manipulation and use of the data must be unique to
the individual candidate. Where information from secondary sources has been used, the source must be
given and any short direct quotes must be clearly shown as quotations. Longer quotations are unacceptable
and will be identified as plagiarism. The reports must be in the candidate’s own words except for short
quotations as mentioned above. It is the Centre’s responsibility to check that all work is the candidates’ own
work.
In IGCSE Agriculture there are two aspects to the practical coursework component, the practical exercises
and the practical investigation.
As the practical exercises take place throughout the duration of the course, we recommend that for Centres
with more than one teacher assessing the practical exercises, an initial meeting (run on the lines below) is
held. Further meetings should be held at points in the course when sufficient amounts of evidence become
available.
Initial meeting
• The meeting should discuss points arising from the reading of the assessment criteria in the syllabus
(plus the relevant sections on assessing the practical exercises in this handbook), by all the people
involved in making this assessment (assessors).
• A well-prepared average candidate is selected and asked to perform selected skills (from the
suggestions in the syllabus and this handbook). Each assessor then independently marks the candidate
on the skills that are being demonstrated using the standard ticksheet or marksheet adopted by the
Centre.
• The marking of each marking point is shared and discussed in relation to the assessment criteria.
This should enable the assessors to become skilled in fair, standardised assessment, and the internal
moderator to identify any assessors who might need further support and training.
• The internal moderator selects a sample of the work (say 10 folders) representing the full range of
abilities across the Centre, marks them and keeps a note elsewhere of the marks and any comments so
that the samples themselves remain clean for copying.
• This sample of ten should then be copied and marked by everyone who will be involved in the
assessment.
• Any discrepancies with the marks of the internal moderator should be discussed and agreement should
then be reached on how to apply the assessment criteria. Teachers can then use the sample of ten as a
benchmark for the rest of their marking.
The practical exercises have their own assessment criteria which can be found in section 5.2.2 of the
syllabus. When carrying out their own marking, teachers should annotate the evidence of the practical
exercises at the time that each exercise is completed, indicating why those marks were given through short
comments directly related to the assessment criteria. These annotations will be very useful to the external
moderator at Cambridge.
If the marking appears reliable and well-standardised with the moderator, no further changes are necessary
– the marking should be accepted.
If there is a discernible pattern of either leniency or severity in anyone’s marking perhaps across the mark
scheme as a whole or just in relation to a particular section, then it may be possible to ‘scale’ the marking
of that teacher by adjusting all their marking by the same proportion (in the area affected) without having to
re-mark every submission individually.
However, if no pattern is discernible in the erroneous marking of any given teacher then additional samples
should be taken until there is no further remaining doubt or until all affected submissions are re-marked.
Notes of any particular difficulties should be kept so that further training and support can be given over the
next year and to inform discussion at the meetings to ensure that standardisation and fairness improve year-
on-year.
A reliable rank order can then be established in the marking of the Centre.
At this point all Individual Candidate Record Cards can then be finalised and the Coursework Assessment
Summary Form carefully completed. Indications that internal moderation has taken place should be evident
on the Individual Candidate Record Cards where marks have been amended.
Always get another person to check your work when transferring figures from one document to another.
• If you are a UK Centre, at present, Cambridge will send a list of selected candidates from which to
make up the moderation sample. As well as the candidates that we have selected you will also need to
include at least one candidate on the highest mark and at least one on the lowest mark in your sample,
(providing these are not already on the list).
• If you are an International Centre you will need to select your own sample.
The sample should be selected to represent the full ability range of the Centre, covering the whole mark
range, with the marks spaced as evenly as possible from the top mark to the lowest mark. If appropriate, the
samples should be selected from the classes of different teachers. It is possible that a second sample may
be requested so please retain all records and supporting written work until after the publication of results.
All the coursework that contributed to the final mark for the selected candidates must be sent to the
external moderator. Please check the information in Section 3 of the Cambridge Administrative Guide (either
UK or International version) to establish the number of portfolios required in the sample.
• Coursework Assessment Summary Forms covering the entire cohort from your Centre.
• Coursework samples from across the range of marks and from multiple teachers where appropriate,
each including their Individual Candidate Record Cards.
• Instructions given by teachers to learners for the assessed practical work.
• Mark schemes for each practical exercise or practical investigation where these have been customised
for specific tasks or where they have been annotated to help justify any marking decisions that have
been made.
• The second copy of the Internal Assessment Mark Sheet (MS1) from your MIS system or CIE Direct
internal marks report.
• Any materials used to implement the internal moderation process (e.g. spreadsheets and notes).
Remember that electronic submission of coursework is preferred either on USB Flash drive/memory stick,
CD or DVD. Evidence in hard copy can be scanned to digitise it. You should send the candidates’ portfolios
plus a general folder containing the administrative forms and internal moderation materials, etc. These can
include items such as spreadsheets, notes and other materials that were used during internal moderation. If
it is not possible to send the submissions electronically then you can send them as hard copy.
Always check the latest version of the Cambridge Administrative Guide and the Cambridge
Handbook for Centres for the most recent information on procedures and for key administrative
deadlines as these may vary from time to time.
In order to enable external moderation of the teacher-marked practical work, certain forms of evidence need
to be submitted as part of the coursework portfolio. Both candidate and teacher-generated evidence for
both parts of the coursework should make up each individual candidate’s portfolio. It is important to do this
for every candidate so that whichever samples are selected for the external moderation sample they will
contain all relevant information and evidence. In addition candidates and teachers should all have put in the
same effort to collect and organise each portfolio in the interests of fairness and effective standardisation
and moderation.
• When completing the record card please take care to make the description as detailed as possible.
• Ensure that all details are completed in full.
• Keep a copy of all forms completed for your records as a back-up.
• Storing work electronically is preferred. Please keep it suitably backed up. Candidates should be
encouraged to keep their own copy.
&DPEULGJH,*&6($JULFXOWXUH
3OHDVHIROORZWKHVHLQVWUXFWLRQVFDUHIXOO\EHIRUHFRPSOHWLQJWKH3'),QGLYLGXDO&DQGLGDWH5HFRUG&DUGVSURYLGHGEHORZ
IROORZWK
1. Thi
This a interact
Th s form is an interactive PDF and may be completed in one of three ways:
x on--scr
on
on-screen t
screen and then printed
printe out
x n-screen
on-screen pr
creen and then printed out; add any internally moderated marks by hand
Co
x p
printed out and completed on paper by hand.
Please read the previous printed instructions and the General Coursework Regulations before completing this form.
Centre Number Centre Name Exam Series . Year
Candidate Number Candidate Name Teaching Group/Set
rk
Ha
nd
bo
TOTAL
MARK
Marks to be transferred to Coursework
0 0 0 0 0 0
Assessment Summary Form
ok
(max 12) (max 12) (max 12) (max 12) (max 12) (max 60)
Example Individual Candidate Record Card – Individual Research
&DPEULGJH,*&6($JULFXOWXUH
3OHDVHIROORZWKHVHLQVWUXFWLRQVFDUHIXOO\EHIRUHFRPSOHWLQJWKH3'),QGLYLGXDO&DQGLGDWH5HFRUG&DUGVSURYLGHGEHORZ
1. interactive
This form is an interacti
interac PDF and may be completed in one of three ways:
x on-screen
creen
reen and then printed
printe out
x on-screen
screen
reen and then
the
en printed
print out; add
a any internally moderated marks by hand
x printed out
ut and
d completed on paper
p by hand.
Co
Cambridge recommends that,
t, wherever form is completed on-screen. The form will add up the candidates’ marks for you and eliminate the risk of calculation error.
herever possible, this fo
4. Completing the,QGLYLGXDO&DQGLGDWH5HFRUG&DUG
wo
x Complete the information at the top of the form.
x Mark the Coursework for each candidate according to the marking criteria in the
he Syllabus booklet.
bookle
x Enter the marks in the appropriate spaces.
rk
x If you are completing the form on paper by hand, add up the marks and write the total in the ‘Total
a
all Mark’ column.
column. If you are
a completing the form on screen, the marks will be added up for
you and the total will automatically appear in the ‘Total Mark’ column.
x Include the details of the teaching group or set for each candidate. The initials of the teacher may be used
ed to
o identify the group or set.
Ha
x It is essential that the marks of candidates from different teaching groups within each Centre are moderated internally.
ternally.
rnally.
x In the column called ‘Internally Moderated Mark’, enter the total mark awarded after internal moderation has taken place.
ace.
x hat
at doc
Transfer the marks to the &RXUVHZRUN$VVHVVPHQW6XPPDU\)RUPfor component 06, in line with the instructions given on that document.
ument.
nd
5. Both the teacher completing the form and the internal moderator should check the form and complete and sign the bottom portion.
bo
6. 3OHDVHNHHSDFRS\RIWKH,QGLYLGXDO&DQGLGDWH5HFRUG&DUG V IRU\RXUUHFRUGV
ok
1 Selection of qu
questions ((hypothesis)
se
/5
rk
4 Deductions
/5
Ha
5 Recognitions of limitations
/5
nd
6 Description of investigation
/5
Total Mark 0
bo
ok (max
max 30)
Example Coursework Assessment Summary Form
Cambridge IGCSE/ Cambridge ,QWHUQDWLRQDOO Level AJULFXOWXUH
3OHDVHIROORZWKHVHLQVWUXFWLRQVFDUHIXOO\EHIRUHFRPSOHWLQJWKH3')&RXUVHZRUN$VVHVVPHQW6XPPDU\)RUPSURYLGHGEHORZ
5. Both the teacher completing the form and the internal moderator should check the form and complete and sign the bottom portion.
bo
6. Please keep a copy of the &RXUVHZRUN$VVHVVPHQW6XPPDU\)RUP V for your records.
ok
([WHUQDO0RGHUDWLRQ
A sample of candidates’ work must be submitted to Cambridge for external moderation. Details of the work to be submitted may be found by visiting the samples database at www.cie.org.uk/samples. Teachers should
work with their exams officer to make sure the correct coursework is submitted along with the supporting forms according to the instructions in the Cambridge Administrative Guide.
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6
Candidate Candidate Name Teaching
hing
ing Responsibility Initiative
In Technique Perseverance Quality Selection of Plan and Handling Deductions Recognition Description Total Internally
ou
Number Group/ (max 12) (max
(ma 12) (max(ma 12) (max 12) (max 12) questions principles of evidence (max 5) of of Mark Moderated
Centre (hypotheses) investigation (max 5) limitations investigation (max 90) Mark
Set (max 5) (max 5) (max 5) (max 5) (max 90)
0
rse
0
wo
0
Section 4: Administration and moderation of practical coursework
0
rk
0
0
Ha
0
0
nd
0
0
bo
Name of teacher completing this form Signature Date
ok
Name of internal moderator Signature Date
Section 5: Exemplars for marking practice
The following exemplar materials have been reproduced to provide as authentic an experience as possible of
marking candidates’ work. You will therefore find errors in layout, spelling and grammar uncorrected and as
they appear in the original work.
• Look at the three exemplars and mark them using the mark schemes in Section 2 of this handbook or
from Section 5 of the syllabus.
Exemplar 1: Adlib feeding versus restricted feeding on layers
Exemplar 2: The effects of ethylene on the ripening of green bananas
Exemplar 3: Investigating the performance of Hercules which is a summer variety of cabbage, when
grown in winter.
• Compare your mark with those suggested in the text boxes.
• Try to identify what has caused any discrepancies between the two.
5.1 Exemplar 1
Fig. 4 A table showing the both egg percentage and production numbers 8
Fig. 5 Bar Chart showing egg production per week in the two systems 9
iii
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
Layers are chickens that are kept for their eggs. Under poultry production, layers can be kept in the deep
litter and in the battery cage system if you want the eggs to be safely laid. Layers require a regular supply of
food daily in order for them to grow and develop normally. Chickens can be fed in two ways: by making sure
feed is available at all times (adlib feeding) or by giving a measured amount (restricted feeding). The feed
given to layers depends on their age. Layers are fed layers mash which gives extra protein and minerals for
them to produce quality eggs.
Chickens (layers) have a definite calcium appetite, energy appetite(grain) and protei n appetite(high protein
poultry ration), Ruff (2006).A layer which lays an egg each day will eat far more calcium than one which lays
an egg a week. Adlib offers chickens as much (balanced, high-quality) chicken feed as they want, and settle
for whatever amount of foraging they discover on their own. Restricted requires the chickens to be fed less
feed amounting to 120grams per day (Ngugi, 1 978).
The most popular egg producing breeds are the leghorn, Ancona and Minorcan, The white leghorn is the
most common basis for the development of layer hybrids because of i ts weight and high egg production.
Mature cockerels and hens weigh approximately 2.7kg and 1.8kg. Hybrid layers come into lay at the age of 1
8 to 22 weeks, and remain productive for at least nine months if they are well managed (Macmlillan, 2008).
The purpose of the project was to find out feeding system which is best suitable for layers. The researcher
wanted to study and rate the percentage of eggs laid weekly under adlib feeding against to that of restricted
feeding. It was to confirm if restricted feeding is the best feeding method to conduct to layers and would
there be any change in the number of eggs produced.
1.2 Justification
Is the feed being wasted when overfeeding the layers or is it worth it? The study will help us see the right
feeding system to use when keeping layers.
Will the layers grow and lay well as it happens with restricted feeding? This study was to help the researcher
see the effect of feeding amounts given to layers and determine the importance of feeding layers with the
rightful amounts of mash. Farmers overfeeding the layers would realize that it is wastage of feed.
1.3 Objective
To describe the effects of restricted and adlibtum feeding on the laying percentage of layers.
1.4 Hypotheses
Restricted feeding increases the laying percentage of layers than adlib feeding.
Adlib feeding increases the laying percentage of layers than restricted feeding.
The was lack of enough space which caused poor air circulation in the poultry house.
The poultry house would get dirty very easily and bad odour would accumulate the house.
There were late delivering of orders (feed) and these would get the layers stressed.
A lot of people entering the poultry house disturbed the layers when trying to lay, with the noise.
CHAPTER II
LITERATURE REVIEW
Feeding chickens
Layers normally exhibit two peak feed consumption periods-one at the time of lay and the other late in the
afternoon. Hybrid layers reach peak egg production after 5–8 weeks and will continue to lay for about 300
days. They begin to lay about an hour after first light and light encourages feeding, the provision of additional
light in the moming and again in the evening should encourage layers to eat during the cooler periods.
Laying birds should receive 12–14 hours of light per day for optimum egg production (Macmillan, 2008).
Fresh, clean water must always be available, in addition to feeding practices people entering and exiting the
poultry house should disinfect their shoes.
Restricted feeding
Pellets/crumbles-the feeding of these is to some extent advantageous, there is less wastage. Birds cannot
select out specific feeds and are therefore likely to obtain all the nutrients included in the ration. However,
the feeding of pellets does tend to increase the incidence of cannibalism. Cannibalism is caused to due to a
deficiency in the diet or to sheer boredom.
Ngugi at Eastern African for agriculture (1990) stated that diets need to be limited for the older birds. Young
chicks that are well reared, start to lay eggs at 22–24 weeks old. He further mentioned that birds should
well fed, given a proportion of grit in the diet to produce strong egg shells. Farmers feed layers’ mash only
to their laying bird, which contains 11–12% protein, given an amount of 120 grams of layers mash per day.
They must also be provided with grit.
It is claimed that the best feeding to use is restricted feeding, because the layers are limited to a certain
amount of feed. Care is taken as to how much feed is used. It increases the chances of higher profits
because less food is consumed; therefore less money is used to buy it. At the same time more feed means
higher egg production and excellent production and excellent performance by chickens.
Adlibtum feeding
Adlibtum feeding consumes feed faster, at large amounts and unnoticeably, more than necessary food in
short period of time. Adlib feeding is not a good idea. Birds must search and dig for
their food ( Ruff, 2006). He stated that if you are fattening layers for the table then limiting the feeds would
help because as you feed them they gobble up the food quickly. Three good feeds a day would fatten an
Indian bird. Adlib has always been believed to be a waste of feed whilst restricted feeding would lead the
chickens to starvation.
During the laying period the birds may be kept in a house with a battery cage system, or in a deep litter
house. If they are kept in deep litter houses, nests or laying boxes must be provided. Each layer requires a
floor space of 0.3 min deep litter houses (Macmillan Agriculture, 2008).
During the laying period the birds must be kept in a house with a battery cage system, or in a deep litter
house. If they are kept in deep litter houses, nests or laying boxes must be provided. Layers require a floor
space of 0.3 m in deep litter houses. On this period layers are fed Layers mash, which contains 11–12%
protein. They must also be provided with grit (Sakira, W.A,1981).
In record keeping, each day there must be recordings for eggs laid, food eaten, egg sales and deaths and
culls if any. The laying percentage can also be calculated once a week, this gives a guide to how well the
hens are laying. In 1 938, the first trough chain feeder was introduced, becoming the standard for the
poultry industry. This way chickens were able to get the amounts of feed they needed. Adlib feeding (deep
litter), the layers suffer from large differences in weight gain. Competition is too high so chickens have to run
to the feed as it’s dropped on the ground pans. For the health of the chickens and well being, during winter
they can be provided with green supplements like second cut alfalfa hay that’s been soaked overnight in
fresh water.
If hatchability percentages are above 65% of all eggs set are obtained, then it’s considered that the
minimum percentage is satisfactory.
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY
Sixteen (16) layers were kept in the deep litter and the other 16 in the battery cage system for restricted
feeding. Deep litter, chickens were overfed with no strict measurements.
In the battery cage they were given a measured amount of 120gm including water in both systems. Before
settling in the birds, the room had to be cleaned.
1. Selection of question/hypothesis
Hypothesis clearly expressed and shows evidence of a candidate working independently.
It can be helpful if when marking teachers give an annotated comment to confirm this hypothesis was
formulated without direct support.
Award 5 marks
We would fill in sow dust in the deep litter system and place inside two nest boxes, placed the feeder and
waterer.
In the battery cage, blocks were placed on the floor and filled the circle with sow dust; this was for ensuring
that the droppings settle on the sow dust.
Record keeping with layers is essential in order to keep a check on how well your enterprise is doing. A
good layer should lay one egg per day.
Deep litter was recorded as a whole group, and in the battery cage per individual. Eggs were collected daily
for eight (8) weeks, and at the end of each week the laying percentage was calculated.
2. Planning
The plan produced lacks some in depth and detail but covers all the main aspects even identifying
limitations of the procedure at this stage. The plan is workable, producing a range of excellent data.
Own plan produced without guidance not quite sufficient for 5 marks.
Award 4 marks
Fig 2: Percentage egg production between the Deep and the Battery systems
Fig 3: A pie Chart showing percentage in egg production between the two systems
A the end of the research as shown by the charts Fig 1 and Fig 2 above, the total average number of eggs
recorded in the restricted feeding was 99.6% and in the ad-lib feeding the total was 59.5%. The mass of
each layer in the battery cage was 2.7kg, whilst in the deep litter they ranged from 3.0 to 3.2kg. Average
difference between the two was 40.1 percent.
It was observed that the deep litter chickens were of bigger mass ( 3–3.2kg ) than the battery cages ones
( 2.7kg ). This could be that the deep litter ones got a lot of feed than the cages which were restricted in
feed. The total average difference in egg production between the two systems was 40.1 percent.
3. Handling of Evidence
Neat, well-presented tables of results with appropriate graphs using suitable scales and proportions.
The graphs clearly show the outcome of the study. Pie charts helpful and easy to interpret.
Work appears accurate and labelled.
Ideally it would be good to see more tabulated data at this stage but it is evident in the remaining text.
The graphs have been commented on effectively.
Award 5 marks
CHAPTER IV
Two samples were made in the findings. One was layers in a cage feed and others in deep litter feed. After
eight weeks (8) of sampl ing, the results were as shown in the ta ble below.
The above bar chart compares egg production in percentage between the Restricted Feeding Battery Cage
and Adlib Feeding on Deep Litter.
Fig 6: The line graph above shows the egg production in percentage between the two feeding types.
During the first week the number of eggs produced using the restricted system were high with 59 eggs
laid, compared to the adlib system which had a very low number of 13. Percentage became 53 against 11.6.
The average percent on Battery Cage system was 99,6% while on the Deep Litter it was only 59.5%. The
percentage difference is 40.1%. The total difference on number of eggs produced is 321 eggs.
CHAPTERS
Findings
The difference between the two systems was that; the restricted fed chickens produced a lot more eggs.
The layers were always lively, and healthy. Less is more and with the layers they were able to produce the
best results, whilst adlib fed animals gained a lot weight because of the overfeeding, they became lazy,
moving from average weight of 2.5 kg to 3.2 kg. They became unhealthy and lost appetite.
The duration of the project was 2-3 months, from February to early April. Eggs were collected twice a day.
A daily record keeping of the numbers of eggs produced daily were recorded. Adlib feeding consumes feed
faster, at large amounts and unnoticeably, more than necessary food is used in a short period of time, thus
increasing the expenses for buying feed. Restricted feeding is the best method of feeding to use because
chickens are limited to a cet1a in amount of feed. Care is taken as to how much feed is used. It increases
the chances of higher profits because less food is consumed; therefore less money is used to buy it.
Based on literature findings, restricted feeding is considered to be the best feeding system to use on
commercial layers. The research shows that the total average number of eggs produced using the restricted
feeding is 99.6% compared to the adlib feeding which is 59%. This shows a huge difference between the
layers percentage and thus proves that adlib feeding is not a productive feeding system to use in layers.
Adlibtum feeding consumes feed faster and more than necessary in a short period of time.
4. Making deductions
Comprehensive conclusion, related to the evidence, explained and linked to previous research in an
appropriate way. The data has been sensibly selected and appropriate graphs and charts drawn and whole
data brought together in an analytical way.
Award 5 marks
CHAPTER SIX
Summary
The duration of the research from data collection, to compilation, up to conclusion took nine (9) months,
that’s from February to early October. Adlib feeding consumes feed faster, at large amounts and
unnoticeably. The chickens are offered as much feed as they want, and settle for whatever amount of
foraging they discover on their own, this maximizes production and profitability. The layers become bad
layers, unproductive layers and the fats in their bodies are found to be harmful towards human beings. Most
layers go a day without lying which is a sign of abnormality. To ensure that a laying flock produces at its
highest level, the birds should be well fed, given a proportion of grit in the diet to produce strong egg shells.
Restricted feeding is the best method of feeding to use because chickens are limited to a cet1ain amount of
feed.
Conclusions
Layers should be fed 120 g of feed per day. This increases the chances of higher profits because less food is
consumed, therefore less money is used to buy it. Adlib feeding is not a profitable system. The overfeeding
is wastage at the end of it all. They should not waste feed because they are not only wasting money but
they are also killing the layers. The types of records kept for a layer’s enterprise include; vaccination and
production records, egg production records and financial records. Layers record consists of number and
value of layers as they stat1 laying, number of eggs collected per day, dail y food consumption and number
of dead and culled hens. After collecting these records, the researcher can make periodic calculations which
give him an overall picture of the performance of the enterprise .e.g. Percentage egg production. A high
standard of hygiene should be maintained. Feed and water troughs should be cleaned regularly. Where birds
are kept, people entering and leaving the house should disinfect their feet. Unfortunately the unproductive
layers were not culled.
Recommendation
Farmers are recommended to use restricted feeding to their layers in order to produce the best results in
egg production. Restricted feeding does not waste the feed and provides the layers with the right amounts
of food they need to stay active throughout the day. They should also make sure water i s available at all
times to provide a balanced diet for the layers. Farmers are advise to disinfect the poultry house regularly to
avoid diseases. The litter is to be turned at least once a week for health purposes.
Limitations evaluation several problems have been identified within the text including different people being
involved. The Pens not being the same.
However from observation the birds all appeared to behave in a similar way and have remained healthy. The
investigation was carried out with birds being exposed to the same photoperiod and so this should not have
had an adverse effect. Rats taking eggs could easily affect the results but we kept a good check and appear
to have had no problems from rats or other vermin.
The results and conclusions appear to be reliable although the investigation in scientific terms is quite small
and needs to be replicated several times and ideally in identical environmental conditions.
I am confident with the report in as much as within the limits the results and conclusions are supported by
my research.
5. Limitations
The report shows awareness of potential problems and these are addressed within the text and plan as
much as within the conclusion and evaluation. The limitations are not fully appreciated and therefore only
some are covered and only in outline.
Award 4 marks
Acknowledgement
I would like to thank my Agriculture teacher Mr R.I Lamini for guiding me while compiling the project,
without him it would have been very difficult.
Secondly I would like to thank my father Augustine Nuhirwa for the effort he put in making my project be a
success.
I would also like to pass my sincere gratitude to my friends Igyelwa Latsenjwa, Mosipho Hongwee, and
Mongcebo Lixumalo for the great teamwork and making the project possible.
References
Watson, J.M. (1986 Modern Agriculture, Macmillan Boleswa Publishers (Pty) Ltd.
6. Description, presentation
A well organised report not exactly as specified so unable to award full marks however the general standard
of the report is better than the expected standard criteria for 3 marks so
Overall mark 27
The work is typical in that its design has to be limited by the Centre’s resources and the need to involve
other students on the same course. It is essential to ensure such work is the candidates own work. Ideally
candidates should identify where data is collected by them or others.
Such work could also potentially be used as assessment for practical exercises indicated by the use of
words such as I watered, cleaned, checked. Such candidate activities could be used to assess routine care,
cleaning, feeding and maintenance of livestock.
A practical exemplar
My practical exercise task: collect milk from the farm cattle (suckler cows)
1. Collecting and cleaning the milk bucket so that it was suitable for collecting drinking milk.
2. Approaching the animal and checking her while keeping her quiet and content.
3. Checking the milk quality and for disease before collecting it .( because she was also feeding her calf
this reduced the risk of diseases like mastitis.)
4. Milking is a skill i find easy as I have done it all my life some of the class find it hard to get the cow to let
down milk.
5. Keeping the cow calm involved me talking to her all the time and not frightening the calves.
Additional notes could be added to the specific mark scheme if not clear from the task. However these are
practical exercises so written evidence should support the activities only as far as the task requires. For
example, a diary of milking and the milk collected. Simply marking when and where exercises take place (as
well as noting any specific points) allows the teacher to track and evidence candidates’ assessment.
Solves problems without help Aware to collect only a little as the milk
will not keep and it would deprive her
fast growing calf
Offers solutions or explanations to 2 All covered
unexpected problems after seeking advice
Solves problems with help
Recognises faults in experimental methods,
given some pointers
Is uncertain how to proceed and requires 0–1 All covered
considerable help
5.2 Exemplar 2
THE EFFECTS OF EHTYLENE ON THE RIPPENING OF GREEN BANANS
Abstract
This study was conducted to see the effect of ethylene on the ripening of bananas.
The results were such that the presence of ethylene increased the rate of ripening; this was shown by the
number of days taken by the banana to ripen. In the presence of light the rate of ripening further increased
but in darkness the rate of ripening decreased. Light and ethylene improve ripening rapidly and are vital for
the whole ripening process to occur.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Abstract.............................................................................................................................................................I
Chapter I:..........................................................................................................................................................1
Introduction
Justification
Objectives
Hypothesis
Definitions
Chapter II:.........................................................................................................................................................4
Literature review
Methodology
Data Presentation
Chapter V: .......................................................................................................................................................9
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
Plant tissues communicate by means of hormones. Hormones are chemicals that are produced in one
location that have an effect on cells in a different location. Most plant hormones are transported through the
plant vascular system, but some like ethylene are released as a gas.
Ethylene gas (C2H4) is an odourless, colourless gas that exists in nature and is also created by man-made
sources. Not easily detectable, it exists where produce is stored. In nature, the largest producers are plants
and plant products. For instance, fruits, vegetables and floral products which produce ethylene within their
tissues and release it into the surrounding atmosphere. It is also a by-product of man-made processes, such
as combustion.
This gas is a ntural plant hormone. It is produced and released by rapidly-growing plant tissues. It is released
by the growing tips of roots, flowers, damaged tissue and ripening fruit. The hormone has multiple effects
on plants. One is fruit ripening when fruit ripens; the starch in the freshly part of the fruit is converted to
sugar. (www.catalyticgenerators.com/whatisethylene.htm).
Enzyme action causes the ripening responses which are as follows. Firstly, chlorophyll is broken down and
new pigments are made so that the fruit skin changes color from green to red, yellow or blue. Acids are then
broken down so that the fruit changes from sour to neutral. The degradation of starch by amylase produces
sugar. This reduces the mealy quality and increases juiciness by osmosis. Next will be the breakdown of
pectin between the fruit cells, unglues them so they can slip pass each other resulting in a softer fruit.
Lastly, the enzymes also breakdown large organic molecules into smaller ones that can be volatile and u can
detect as an aroma.
While conducting this research, there were numerous limitations including time being a problem factor and
also obtaining information about ethylene as a compound was not an easy feat. We encountered difficulties
with our colleagues as they would eat the bananas used for the experiment.
Purpose of study
The purpose of the study was to observer the role of ethylene and its effects on produce. In addition, to
measure the effect of ethylene gas on the quality and ripening process and lastly, the efficiency of the gas in
the ripening of the fruit.
Justification
Bananas are a small growing agricultural industry in Swaziland. IT is at a stage whereby the use of chemicals
can be managed by the use of natural gases given of by plants such as ethylene. In addition, the cost
of importing bananas from South Africa is an expense to the government resulting in this expenditure
being passed on the consumer. If those costs were absorbed by the use of ethylene, these could go
towards training local farmers and improving on their capacities & to grow more and lessen importation
levels. Furthermore, empowering local farmers to grow more and use natural treatments, one provides
employment, enhances skills and provides additional revenue for people. Moreover, more costs are incurred
while transporting these bananas from South Africa to Swaziland due to rotting before reaching the intended
market. Also some bananas may reach the intended market damaged or not fresh resulting in huge losses.
Furthermore, it causes no health risks as compared to artificial ripening agents such as calcium carbide.
Once this chemical dissolves in water, it produces acetylene which is believed to affect the nervous system.
Problem statement
Small scale farmers in Swaziland lack knowledge on the ripening effect of ethylene and how they can use it
on a larger scale than the time consuming traditional ways of ripening fruit.
Ethylene can be manufactured in a laboratory through the dehydration of alcohols, manufactured ethylene
can be sold to these farmers to cut down on the time spent waiting for fruit to ripen and waiting for a
specific season to grow specific fruits. This will in turn increase profits and in the long run boost the ailing of
economy of Swaziland.
Objectives
1. To determine the rate of fruit ripening caused by ethylene on the bananas under the different
2. To determine the effect of ethylene on the quality of the banana.
3. To determine the effect of the gas on the taste of the banana.
Hypotheses
Main hypothesis
Alternative hypothesis
Increasing levels of ethylene on fruit produced, does not increases the ripening rate.
Definitions
Ethylene gas: It is a simple hydrocarbon gas ( H2C = CH2 ) that is ripening fruits make and shed into the
atmosphere.
Hormone: a chemical substance produced in the plant that encourages growth or influences how the cells
and tissues function.
1. Selection of question/hypothesis
Question selected without help, well expressed and supported by evidence which was explained.
Award 5 marks
CHAPTER II
Literature Review
Discovery of ethylene
The role of ethylene and its effects on produce were discovered by Rudolf who was a commercial farmer in
the eighteenth century. He would store his newly harvested green lemons in sheds kept warm by kerosene
heaters until they turned yellow and ripened enough to market.
When new modern heating systems were tried, the lemons no longer turned yellow in time.
Research soon found that the important factor in the ripening process was small amounts of ethylene gas
given off by the burning kerosene in the heaters. ( www.ethylene.com)
The biological agent that initiates this ripening process after the fruit is mature is naturally produces ethylene
(Koel-beck and Cain, (1984) ). Askay (1996) found that it is not emitted by the plant naturally and cannot
activate the ripening of nearby fruits; rather it is used as a hormone within the plant.
Qubasilar (1973) reported that, sealing fruits in a bag (transparent plastic) enocourages them to ripen since
the plastic bag traps the gas released by the fruit which will be used for immediate ripening of the produce.
Liebig (1899) reported that covered fruit ripening bowls increase the ripening process. The bowls increase
ethylene and carbon dioxide gases around the fruit which promote ripening.
Folklore says that sealing fruits in a bag encourages them to ripen. IT is the bag that traps ethylene released
by the fruit and the ethylene enhances ripening. The Greek philosopher, Theo Prates later recognized that
sycamore fig do not ripen unless scrapped with an iron claw. 23 centuries later, we know that wounding
induces ethylene production resulting in fruit ripening.
Esmail (2006) revealed that ethylene was healthier ripening agent compared to other agents such as calcium
carbide which affect the nervous system and found to b e carcinogenic.
Effectiveness of ethylene
Lincoln (2009) discovered that ethylene gas is effective at 0.1 to 1ppm; one part of ethylene per million parts
of air that’s one cupful of ethylene gas in 62,000 gallons of air is enough to promote the ripening process.
It is estimated that the total bananas produced in the world is at 20 million tons at which Africa provides 50
percent whilst Asia and America 25% percent each by means of ethylene stated Linnaeus (2001).
The even and controlled ripeness that ethylene initiates prevents post-harvest losses of up to 50%
confirmed Rodenburg (2007). Douglas (1910) discovered that oranges cause bananas to ripen naturally.
He also confirmed that, bruised or damaged fruit give more of ethylene gas resulting in fast ripening. In
agreement with this statement, the more gas, the faster chlorophyll is broken down resulting in pigment
changes.
Application of ethylene
Additional externally applied ethylene merely accelerates the normal ripening process.
Numerous studies have shown that there are no important biochemical’s, chemical or physiological
differences between fruit ripened where the naturally produced ethylene has been the triggering
mechanism or where additionally externally applied ethylene has triggered the process in the mature but
unripe fruit disclosed Justus (2002).
Effects of ethylene
Other effects of ethylene include epinasty, hook closure maintenance, initiates germination in grains,
activates dormant buds ( potatoes in storage), stem elongation in deep water rice, induces flowering in
pineapples, promotes female expression in flowers and lastly, it stimulates leaf senescence.
Ethylene is the biological active component of illumination gas, when they noticed that illumination gas was
responsible for the horizontal growth of etiplated pea seedlings which had been cultivated, (Neljubob, 1986).
Emmition of ethylene
It is also known that ethylene is synthesized in response to different types of stress such as wounding, very
low and high temperatures, flooding or drought, treatment with other hormones, heavy metals and attack by
pathogens stated Pech (1992). Yang and Hoffman (1954) also discovered that the ethylene biosynthesis has
now been completely elucidated due to advance in the techniques of biochemical analysis.
Ethylene receptors
Several theories on ethylene signal perception and transduction have been proved to explain the mechanism
by which ethylene receptors could promote signal transduction through a cascade involving several
components reported Zarembiniski and Theologis (994). Giovannoni (2004) and Alonso (2005) concluded
that there are strong indications that the ethylene receptors act as a negative regulator of the ethylene signal
transduction pathway.
Chapter III
Methodology
Research Type:
This was an experimental research aimed at determining the effect of ethylene on the rate of fruit ripening
and the quality of the banana.
Experiment layout
Since this experiment is based on the effect of ethylene on produce, the experiment will be carried out
as follows. Four bananas, apples and eight pears under normal conditions will be the control experiment
observed against four bananas and eight pears in a transparent sealable plastic bag, bananas in a refuse bag
with the pears and bananas in a box with pears as the experiment.
Equipment
2. Planning
The plan is not fully explained and does not clearly show how levels of ripeness could be assessed.
However the research is used to design the experiment. The design has allowed sufficient data to be
collected and would allow the reader to perform a similar experiment so can just award 3 marks.
Award 3 marks
3. Handling of Evidence
A well presented and informative table of results. Not easy to interpret the validity or purpose of the
information. The bar chart axis not clearly labelled.
Light and temperature are one of the most important factors in fruit ripening, this experiment proved this in
that the banana took the shortest time to complete the ripening process compared to all the other bananas
in the various experiments. The light and temperature provide the banana with enough energy to ripen.
Another factor leading to this rapid ripening is the fact that the ripening agent ethylene released by the
ripened apple was not lost to the atmosphere but trapped in the bag. The bag was black, which means it
had the ability to trap heat energy within the bag, thereby enhancing ripening process.
As in the experiment above, the amount of time taken for the banana to ripen was quicker compared to the
other experiments. This is because the experiment was exposed to light, providing the banana with enough
chemical and heat energy to carry out chemical reactions. The plastic bag trapped the ethylene released by
the ripened apple, which speed up the process.
This banana took a longer time to ripen because of the absence of the ripened apple to release ethylene to
speed up the ripening process, all other factors existing, without ethylene ripening was negatively affected.
This banana took a longer time to ripen compared to the banana in the transparent plastic bag because it
was not exposed to light and did not have exposure to ethylene from a ripened apple, therefore ripening was
disrupted.
These experiments took the same number of days because the box blocked out any light from coming
through. Even though the apples were present these banana took longer to ripen because of their lack of
exposure to light for energy to carry out chemical reactions for ripening to complete.
These bananas took even longer than the bananas in the previous experiment because of the absence of the
ripening factor, ethylene. The difference in exposure to light was not visible as the box limited the amount of
light available to the banana in the experiment conducted in light.
This banana ripened rapidly, even rotting after a few more days because of the over exposure to light, the
direct exposure to light, the fruit had too much light energy to make use of, hence excessively speeding up
the ripening process.
This banana took the longest time to ripen compared to all the other bananas in the various experiments due
to the fact that it was not exposed to ethylene as a ripening agent and also light was not directly exposed to
it thereby reducing temperature and slowing the ripening process.
CHAPTER VI
SUMMARY
The presence of ethylene coupled with light energy greatly enhance the ripening process in fruit, even with
all conditions present, the absence of either one of the is a limiting factor to the ripening process but to get
the best yield they both emus b provided in moderation as too much exposure to either will lead to rotting.
Research conducted on the taste of the banana indicated that the bananas exposed to light and ethylene
were sweeter, easier to peel and had a sour smell. The bananas not exposed to light and ethylene were
harder to peel and their flesh was firmer, harder to bite into.
CONCLUSION
The presence of ethylene significantly speeds up the ripening process in fruit; coupled with light energy the
speed is further improved. This knowledge can be used to use Ethylene nationwide to ripen citrus fruits
in Swaziland, Swaziland is mostly recognized for growing field crops, and the use of ethylene nationwide
would help Swaziland diversify whilst at the same time bringing more revenue into the country.
4. Making deductions
The conclusion appears to be more related to the research than directly linked to the data from the
investigation. Two main deductions given that are sufficiently related to the investigation.
Award 4 marks
5. Limitations
This part has not really been addressed by the report. Although suggestions for future investigation are
made they do not relate closely to the actual investigation. The candidate has not shown an awareness
of the qualitative nature of the report.
Award 1 mark
6. Description, presentation
Generally meets the desired structure with some omissions. The report is neat and logical. The investigation
is discussed in a way which shows a mature understanding and application of the topic in a broad context
not just linked to the actual practical of the investigation.
Overall mark 21
The report is just a C grade and although it has aspects of work more typical of a good B grade candidate
the work is mixed and not a well constructed investigation lacking a scientific approach.
It has not been related to a practical exercise although it could be with some additions. It could have been
used to support assessment of practical exercises based around work on harvesting times and marketing
the produce.
5.3 Exemplar 3
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
a) Background
d) Hypothesis
g) Defination of term
CHAPTER 3
METHODOLOGY
a) Plot selection
b) Plot layout
c) Planting
d) Plot mantainance
e) Data collection
f) Data analysis
CHAPTER4
CHAPTER 5
CHAPTER 1
INTRTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND
Cabbage is the ancestor of cauliflower and broccoli. It was a wild plant that grew on the coasts of Europe
and North Africa. Cabbage is generally a cool season crop which is always grown from seed which are
sown in seedbeds and later transplanted. Cabbage being cool season crop that grow best in winter months,
due to market demand in summer varieties with heat tolerance have been bred and such varieties are now
available in seed markets such as Grandslam, Hercules, topmost. Also varieties like Hercules, big copper,
brano, star and green star were found to be resistant to diseases and that why cabbage can be grown any
time of the year in almost all areas in Swaziland. It is grown mainly for salads and also cooked for its great
supply of vitamins and minerals which improves ones diet. It responds well to kraal manure applied before
planting and when you have used the manure synthetic fertiliser should be reduced by about 25%. Cabbage
grows well in PH of about 5.5 and 7.0. When growing cabbage even if the temperatures are a few degrees
below freezing, it will not adversely affect the crop. The spacing is usually 60cm apart and 60cm between
the rows. Cabbages are ready for harvesting about 3-4 months after sowing.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
Famers have a tendency of choosing seedlings at random not considering varieties that will suit their places
and season. The intention of this project was to find out if a summer variety of cabbage (Hercules) can
perform in winter so that farmers may be selective or not when choosing varieties of seedling or seeds. For
example you want to plant cabbages in the Low yield where temperatures are a bit higher even in winter the
question which variety to use.
SPACIFIC OBJECTIVE
The specific objective project; was: to find the performance of Hercules which is a summer variety when
grown in winter
HYPOTHESIS
1. Selection of question/hypothesis
Hypothesis is well expressed after some discussion. Some initial guidance given so the candidate’s mark
was restricted.
Award 3 marks
IMPORTANCE
The importance of this project is to alert tamers whether to choose or not when buying varieties of cabbage
to grow in a particular area or season
LIMITATIONS
1. LAND – The land the project was to be carried on was too small in that way the results were not going to
be more reliable.
3. MONEY – the money was insufficient to carry the project in different areas.
DEFINATION OF TERMS
CHAPTER 3
METHODOLOGY
PLOT SELECTION
PLOT LAYOUT
PLOT PREPARATION
Four plots marked 2m by 2m and 45cm between the plots which was a pathway. A spade was used to dig
the soil. Large lumps of soil were broken using the edges of a spade. A fork was used for making fine tilth
and levelling was done using a rake. 60g of Fertiliser 2:3:2(22) was broadcasted in all the plots.
2. Planning
Planned without guidance and adequately explained so award the intermediate mark.
Award 4 marks
PLANTING
Planting rows were marked using a string tied between two sticks. Planting stations were marked 60cm by
60cm inter row and intra row. 10g of 2:3:2(22)+0.5%zn was applied in each planting station and filled the
holes with water, after it was drained the seedlings were submerged into the holes, they were deep to their
first set of leaves and watered.
PLOT MAINTENANCE
The plots were watered twice or thrice a day depending on the weather, if it was hot and windy watering
was done 3 times a day and when they were below and at average watering was done 2 times a day.
After a week some weeds germinated and they were removed using a hand fork and a layer of mulch was
applied. Watering rate was increased when the cabbages began to form heads. 3g of LAN was applied as a
top dress 10cm away from the plant as rings.
DATA COLLECTION
The data was collected by measuring the length of leaves every after a week and measuring the
circumference of the head and measuring the mass at harvesting.
DATA ANALYSIS
The data was analysed using the average height and masses.
CHAPTER 4
Samples of 5 cabbages were chosen at random for mass measurements after harvesting and the average
mass was calculated.
0.9kg
1.2kg
0.85kg
1.3kg
1.6kg
3. Handling of Evidence
Results appropriate but only presented as a table and no graphs or charts used.
Award 2 marks
From the results obtained during the study it could be clearly stated that Hercules a summer variety of
cabbage cannot grow better in winter even if you have applied all the conditions necessary for plant growth
this is witnessed from the tables above. The growing rate was very slow due to low temperatures and short
day lengths. The heads grew at a low rate. At harvest the heads were too small and the leaves were thick
and dark green, the plant was short and the stem was thick. When the heads were measured they weighted
less than the expected mass of summer which is 2–4kg yet not even one reached the maximum mass
which is evidence to a literature by commercial vegetable production Swaziland 1996\7 which say matching
the proper cultivar to the season is essential in cabbage production as cabbage varieties differ considerable
to with stand summer and winter temperatures and their resistance to diseases. As summer varieties were
made to with stand summer temperatures when grown in winter where there are low temperatures and
short day lengths it is going to be unable to manufacture enough food due to short day lengths.
CHAPTER 5
SUMMERY
The purpose of the study was to find out whether the growing of cabbage which is a summer variety
in winter can be profitable or not. The study was conducted practically as an experiment to achieve the
objection in hand the experiment was conducted in four plots with the same amount of fertiliser applied.
Watering was done daily and it was well maintained which include weeding, mulching and top dressing.
Data was collected every a week. The results showed that Hercules does not perform better in winter.
CONCLUSION
From the results obtained it was discovered that the summer variety (Hercules) was not able to perform
better in winter when all the necessary conditions were applied.
4. Making deductions
Several deductions based on the evidence and an appropriate conclusion drawn but insufficient detail for
4 marks. See the recommendation: had this been developed the candidate could easily have gained more
marks for this area.
Award 3 marks
RECOMENDATIONS
As a recommendation it can be clearly stated that farmers must be more careful when choosing varieties of
seeds or seedlings to grow particular area or season because matching a cultivar a wrong season or place
may affect production which may cause total inputs to be more than total returns because of low quality
production
REFRENCE
5. Limitations
The candidate identified these at the planning stage and made reference to them in arriving at the conclusion.
No improvement other than implied in the initial identification regarding scale of the investigation.
Award 2 marks
6. Description, presentation
The work was presented in an interesting and clear way but with some partial omissions the work is the
candidates own work and clearly motivated and answering the original question.
Award 3 marks
Overall comment
A sound investigation but limited. It would be hoped that up to two such areas in different places would
be used by better candidates so that the candidate can have an opportunity to access other areas of the
syllabus.
The work is typical of D/E grade work. Had the candidate spent a little more time fully addressing the
marking criteria, this work could have easily gained a few more marks making it C grade.
This could also be easily adapted, allowing practical exercises to be assessed for preparing soil, sowing
seeds as well as transplanting and growing plants. The photographs could easily be used to evidence
practical exercises.
Award 17 marks