I1 2-FinancialReporting
I1 2-FinancialReporting
PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
OF RWANDA
CPA
I1.2
FINANCIAL REPORTING
Study Manual
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in
any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written
permission of ICPAR.
Acknowledgement
We wish to officially recognize all parties who contributed to revising and updating this Manual, Our thanks are extended
to all tutors and lecturers from various training institutions who actively provided their input toward completion of this
exercise and especially the Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning (MINECOFIN) through its PFM Basket Fund
which supported financially the execution of this assignment
INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTANTS OF RWANDA
Intermediate Level
I1.2 FINANCIAL REPORTING
This Manual has been fully revised and updated in accordance with the current syllabus/
curriculum. It has been developed in consultation with experienced tutors and lecturers.
.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Unit
title page
Syllabus: 11
Disclosure 42
Accounting government grants & disclosure of government Assistance IAS 20 43
Introduction 43
Definitions 44
Recognition 44
Accounting treatment 45
Leases IFRS 16 47
IFRS 16 leases 47
Investment property IAS 40 59
Objective 59
Exclusions 59
Definition 59
Recognition and initial measurement 60
Subsequent measurement 60
Cost model 60
Fair value model 60
Cost model vs. Fair value model 61
Transfers 62
Owner-occupied property and investment property 64
Disposals 64
Disclosure requirements 73
Assets with both tangible and intangible elements 74
Website development costs 74
Questions 74
Inventories IAS 2 76
Objective 76
Definitions 77
Measurement 77
Valuation methods 79
Disclosure 79
Repayment of government grants 80
Disclosure 81
Sundry matters 81
Provisions, contingent liabilities & contingent assets IAS 37 81
Objective 81
Provisions 82
Definitions 82
Restructuring 84
Onerous contract 85
Contingent liabilities 85
Contingent assets 85
Disclosures 86
Events after the reporting period IAS 10 87
Objective 87
Definition 87
Dividends 88
Updating disclosures 89
Disclosure 89
Questions 94
The effects of changes in foreign exchange rates IAS 21 95
Introduction 95
Functional and presentation currencies 95
Accounting for individual transactions 96
Disclosure 154
Income taxes IAS 12 154
Introduction 154
Current tax 155
Deferred tax 156
Calculation of deferred tax 157
Why account for deferred tax? 159
Deferred tax liabilities and assets 160
Tax rate 160
Further specific examples 161
Disclosure 185
Operating segments IFRS 8 186
Introduction 186
Definition 187
Reportable segments 187
Disclosing segmental information 188
Drawbacks to segmental reporting 189
Non current assets held for sale and discontinued Operation (IFRS 5) 191
Objective 191
Assets held for sale - definition 192
Assets held for sale - measurement 193
Assets held for sale- presentation in the statement of financial position 193
Assets held for sale – miscellaneous points 193
Assets held for sale - examples 194
Discontinued operations – definition 194
Discontinued operations - presentation 195
Definitions 272
Control 273
Exemptions from the requirement to prepare consolidated financial statements 273
Accounting dates 274
Accounting policies 274
Cessation of control 274
Disclosure 275
Acquistion costs 275
Contingent consideration 275
Mechanics and techniques 277
Consolidated financial statements 2 – advanced consolidated
statement of financial position 285
Determining the fair value of net assets 285
Inter-company inventory profit 287
Inter-company profit on sale of a non-current asset 287
Inter-company debts 288
Preference shares in a subsidiary company 292
Loan notes in a subsidiary company 292
Inter-company dividends 293
Disclosure 321
Consolidated financial statements 4 – consolidated statement of
comprehensive incomes 325
Introduction 325
Non-controlling interest 326
Profit and loss - balance forward in subsidiary 327
Inter company profits 330
Transfers to reserves 337
Debit balance on statement of comprehensive income at acquisition 338
Sales and cost of sales 339
Debenture interest 340
Acquisition of subsidiary during the year 341
Associate companies in the statement of comprehensive ncome 343
Introduction 352
Interested parties 353
Profitability ratios 355
Liquidity ratios 358
Investment ratios 362
Limitations of ratio analysis 365
Other measures of business operations 365
Worked example 366
Accounting for consignments background to consignments 370
Accounting for banks 373
Insurance companies 374
Liquidation & bankruptcies 375
IPSAS 377
Cash flow statements – IPSAS 2 379
Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of this subject students should be able to:
• Prepare the financial statements of companies and groups of companies in accordance with
current international financial reporting standards and national legislation, including:
Syllabus:
1. Conceptual framework for financial reporting
3. Company Accounts
Preparation and presentation of financial statements to comply with the relevant Rwandan
legislation and IFRS, this should focus on both accounting for:
• Applicable standards (IAS 27,IAS 28 IFRS 3 ,IFRS 10 ,IFRS 11and IFRS 13)
• Consolidated statements of financial position, consolidated statements of comprehensive
income, including reserve reconciliations, consolidated statements of cash flow, acquisition
and disposal of subsidiaries and associates (both domestic and overseas) during the year.
• Takeover of sole traders.
• Accounting treatements of associate and joint ventures
The Conceptual Framework states that qualitative characteristics are the attributes that make
the information provided in financial statements useful to users.
The two fundamental qualitative characteristics are relevance and faithful representation. Enhancing
qualitative characteristics are comparability, verifiability, timeliness and understandability
‘Relevance.
Relevant financial information is capable of making a difference in the decisions made by users…
Financial information is capable of making a difference in decisions if it has predictive value,
confirmatory value or both’
The predictive and confirmatory roles of information are interrelated. Information on financial
position and performance is often used to predict future position and performance and other
things of interest to the user, e.g. likely dividend, wage rises. The manner of showing information
will enhance the ability to make predictions, e.g. by highlighting unusual items. The relevance of
information is affected by its nature and materiality.
Materiality ‘Materiality. Information is material if omitting it or misstating it could influence decisions
that the primary users of general-purpose financial reports make on the basis of those reports
which provide financial information about a specific reporting entity’
Information may be judged relevant simply because of its nature. In other cases, both the nature
and materiality of the information are important. An error which is too trivial to affect anyone’s
understanding of the accounts is referred to as immaterial. In preparing accounts, it is important
to assess what is material and what is not, so that time and money are not wasted in the pursuit
of excessive detail. Determining whether or not an item is material is a very subjective exercise.
There is no absolute measure of materiality. It is common to apply a convenient rule of thumb (for
example, material items are those with a value greater than 5% of net profits). However, some
items disclosed in the accounts are regarded as particularly sensitive and even a very small
misstatement of such an item is taken as a material error. An example, in the accounts of a limited
liability company, is the amount of remuneration (salaries and other rewards) paid to directors
of the company. The assessment of an item as material or immaterial may affect its treatment
in the accounts. For example, the statement of profit or loss of a business shows the expenses
incurred grouped under suitable captions (administrative expenses, distribution expenses etc);
but in the case of very small expenses it may be appropriate to lump them together as ‘sundry
expenses’, because a more detailed breakdown is inappropriate for such immaterial amounts. In
assessing whether or not an item is material, it is not only the value of the item which needs to
be considered. The context is also important.
b. If a business has a bank loan of RWF50 million and a RWF55 million balance on
bank deposit account, it will be a material misstatement if these two amounts are netted
off on the statement of financial position as ‘cash at bank RWF5 million’. In other words,
incorrect presentation may amount to material misstatement even if there is a very small
or even no monetary error.
Prudence was removed from the 2010 Conceptual Framework as it was deemed to be implied
within the depiction of neutrality, and that the term was being interpreted in different ways.
However, it was felt that the exercise of prudence, along with understanding the substance of
the transitions, rather than the pure legality of them, was required to be explicitly stated in the
2018 revisions to the Conceptual Framework. Furthermore, the Conceptual Framework 2018
revision included a clear definition of the term in order to clarify any potential areas of confusion
Substance over form
Comparability
Comparability. Comparability is the qualitative characteristic that enables users to identify and
understand similarities in, and differences among, items’ (Conceptual Framework: para. 2.25).
‘Information about a reporting entity is more useful if it can be compared with similar information
about other entities and with similar information about the same entity for another period or date’
(Conceptual Framework: para. 2.24).
‘Consistency, although related to comparability, is not the same. Consistency refers to the use
of the same methods for the same items (ie consistency of treatment) either from period to
period within a reporting entity or in a single period across entities’ (Conceptual Framework:
para. 2.26). The disclosure of accounting policies is particularly important here. Users must
be able to distinguish between different accounting policies in order to be able to make a valid
comparison of similar items in the accounts of different entities. Comparability is not the same
as uniformity. Entities should change accounting policies if those policies become inappropriate.
Corresponding information for preceding periods should be shown to enable comparison to be
made over time.
Information that can be independently verified is generally more decision-useful than information
that cannot.
Timeliness
Timeliness. Timeliness means having information available to decision-makers in time to be
capable of influencing their decisions. Generally, the older information is the less useful it is’
(Conceptual Framework: para. 2.33).
Information may become less useful if there is a delay in reporting it. There is a balance between
timeliness and the provision of reliable information. If information is reported on a timely basis
when not all aspects of the transaction are known, it may not be complete or free from error.
Conversely, if every detail of a transaction is known, it may be too late to publish the information
because it has become irrelevant. The overriding consideration is how best to satisfy the economic
decision-making needs of the users.
Understandability
Understandability. Classifying, characterizing and presenting information clearly and concisely
makes it understandable’ (Conceptual Framework: para. 2.34).
Financial reports are prepared for users who have a reasonable knowledge of business and
economic activities and who review and analyses the information diligently. Some phenomena
are inherently complex and cannot be made easy to understand. Excluding information on those
phenomena might make the information easier to understand, but without it those reports would
be incomplete and therefore misleading. Therefore, matters should not be left out of financial
statements simply due to their difficulty, as even well-informed and diligent users may sometimes
need the aid of an adviser to understand information about complex economic phenomena.
Whether an item satisfies any of the definitions above will depend on the substance and economic
reality of the transaction, not merely its legal form.
Asset
We can look in more detail at the components of the definitions given above. Potential to produce
economic benefits. An economic resource is a right that has the potential to produce economic
benefits (Conceptual Framework, para. 4.14).
Liabilities
Again, we can look more closely at some aspects of the definition of a liability as per the
Conceptual Framework: For a liability to exist, three criteria must all be satisfied:
An essential characteristic of a liability is that the entity has an obligation. Obligation. ‘A duty or
responsibility that the entity has no practical ability to avoid’ (para. 4.29).
A present obligation exists as a result of past events if the entity has already obtained economic
benefits or taken an action, and as a consequence, the entity will or may have to transfer an
economic resource that it would not otherwise have had to transfer (para. 4.43). (Conceptual
Framework) It is important to distinguish between a present obligation and a future commitment.
A management decision to purchase assets in the future does not, in itself, give rise to a present
obligation.
EXAMPLE
Consider the following situations. In each case, do we have an asset or liability within the
definitions given by the Conceptual Framework? Give reasons for your answer.
(a) Mucyo Ltd has purchased a patent for RWF20,000,000. The patent gives the company sole
use of a particular manufacturing process which will save RWF3,000,000 a year for the next
five years.
(b) Kalisa Ltd paid René Gatera RWF10,000,000 to set up a car repair shop, on condition that
priority treatment is given to cars from the company’s fleet.
(c) Deals on Wheels Ltd provides a warranty with every car sold.
ANSWER
(a) This is an asset, albeit an intangible one. There is a past event, control and future economic
benefit (through cost savings).
(b) This cannot be classified as an asset. Kalisa Ltd has no control over the car repair shop and
it is difficult to argue that there are ‘future economic benefits’.
(c) The warranty provided constitutes a liability; the business has taken on an obligation. It
would be recognized when the warranty is issued rather than when a claim is made
Performance
The elements affecting financial performance are income and expenses.
Profit is used as a measure of performance, or as a basis for other measures (e.g. earnings per
share). It depends directly on the measurement of income and expenses, which in turn depend
(in part) on the concepts of capital and capital maintenance adopted. The elements of income
and expense are therefore defined. x Income. ‘Increases in assets, or decreases in liabilities,
that result in increases in equity, other than those relating to contributions from holders of equity
claims.’ x Expenses. ‘Decreases in assets, or increases in liabilities, that result in decreases in
equity other than those relating to distributions to holders of equity claims.
Income and expenses can be presented in different ways in the statement of profit or loss and
other comprehensive income, to provide information relevant for economic decision making. For
example, income and expenses which relate to continuing operations are distinguished from the
results of discontinued operations.
Income. Revenue arises in the course of ordinary activities of an entity. ‘Increases in assets’
include those arising on the disposal of non-current assets. The definition of income also includes
unrealized gains, e.g. on revaluation of marketable securities.
Expenses As with income, expenses include losses as well as those expenses that arise in the
course of ordinary activities of an entity. Losses will include those arising on the disposal of
non-current assets. The definition of expenses will also include unrealized losses, e.g. the fall in
value of an investment.
An asset or liability should be recognized if it will be both relevant and provide users of the
financial statements with a faithful representation of the transactions of that entity, The Conceptual
Framework takes these fundamental qualitative characteristics along with the definitions of the
elements of the financial statements as the key components of recognition. Previously, recognition
of elements would have been affected by the probability of whether the event was going to
happen and the reliability of the measurement. The IASB has revised this as they believed
this set too rigid a criterion as entities may not disclose relevant information which would be
necessary for the user of the financial statements because of the difficulty of estimating both the
likelihood and the amount of the element. Even if an item is not recognized, then the preparers
of the financial statements should consider whether, in order to meet the faithful representation
requirement, there should be a description in the notes to the financial statements. Derecognition
is the removal of all or part of a recognized asset or liability from an entity’s statement of financial
position. Derecognition normally occurs when that item no longer meets the definition of an asset
or liability. (Conceptual Framework: para. 5.26)
INTRODUCTION
IAS 1 (Revised) was published in September 2007. It introduced a number of changes, the main
ones being as follows:
• The titles of the main financial statements were amended to Statement of Changes in
Position, Statement of Comprehensive Income and Statement of Cash Flows
• To present all non-owner changes in equity (comprehensive income) either in one statement
of comprehensive income or a separate income statement and statement showing other
comprehensive income
• To present a statement of financial position at the beginning of the earliest comparative period
when the entity applies a prior period adjustment.
The intention of the revision is to improve the quality of the information provided to users by
aggregating information in the financial statements on the basis of shared characteristics.
B. OBJECTIVE
The objectives of IAS 1 are to:
• Provide the formats for the presentation of Financial Statements, such as Statement of
Comprehensive
• Income and Statement of Financial Position.
• Ensure that the Financial Statements are comparable year on year for the entity and
comparable to competitors.
• Set out the disclosure required by management relating to the judgements they have made in
selecting the entity’s accounting policies.
• Set out the disclosure to be made in relation to estimating uncertainty at the Statement of
Financial Position date, in particular where there is a significant risk of causing a material
adjustment to the carrying amounts at which assets and liabilities will be presented in the next
financial year.
Financial statements also show the results of management’s stewardship of the entity’s resources.
An entity may use titles for the statements other than those stated above. For example, an entity
may continue to use the previous title of Statement of Financial Position and cash flow statement.
• An outline of the main factors affecting performance including changes in the business
environment in which the entity operates. How the entity has reacted to those changes and
the effect.
• Entity’s policy for investment and its dividend policy.
• How the entity is financed.
• Any resources that the entity uses that are not disclosed on the Statement of Financial
Position in accordance with IFRSs.
Any reports provided in addition to the Financial Statements are outside the scope of the IASs.
G. SUNDRY MATTERS
Fair Presentation and Compliance with IFRSs
The financial statements must “present fairly” the financial position, financial performance and
cash flows of an
entity. Fair presentation requires the faithful representation of the effects of transactions, other
events, and conditions in accordance with the definitions and recognition criteria for assets,
IAS 1 requires that an entity whose financial statements comply with IFRSs make an explicit
and unreserved statement of such compliance in the notes. Financial statements shall not
be described as complying with IFRSs unless they comply with all the requirements of IFRSs
(including Interpretations).
Inappropriate accounting policies are not rectified either by disclosure of the accounting policies
used or by notes or explanatory material.
IAS 1 acknowledges that, in extremely rare circumstances, management may conclude that
compliance with an IFRS requirement would be so misleading that it would conflict with the
objective of financial statements set out in the Framework. In such a case, the entity is required
to depart from the IFRS requirement, with detailed disclosure of the nature, reasons, and impact
of the departure
Going Concern
An entity preparing IFRS financial statements is presumed to be a going concern. If management
has significant
concerns about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, the uncertainties must
be disclosed. If management concludes that the entity is not a going concern, the financial
statements should not be prepared on a going concern basis, in which case IAS 1 requires a
series of disclosures.
Consistency of Presentation
The presentation and classification of items in the financial statements shall be retained from
one period to the next unless a change is justified either by a change in circumstances or a
requirement of a new IFRS.
Materiality has been defined as follows: “Omissions or misstatements of items are material if
they could, individually or collectively, influence the economic decisions of users taken on the
basis of the Financial Statements. Materiality depends in the size and nature of the omission or
misstatement judged in the circumstances. The size or nature of the item, or a combination of
both, could be the determining factor.”
Current Assets
An asset shall be classified as current when it satisfies any of the following criteria:
• It is expected to be realised or is intended for sale or use in the entity’s normal operating
cycle;
• It is held primarily for the purpose of being traded;
• It is expected to be realised within 12 months after the Statement of Financial Position date,
or
• It is cash or a cash equivalent (as defined by IAS 7 Cash Flow Statements) All other assets
shall be classified as non-current.
Current Liabilities
A liability shall be classified as current when it satisfies any of the following criteria:
• It is expected to be settled in the entity’s normal operating cycle;
• It is held primarily for the purpose of being traded;
• It is due to be settled within 12 months after the Statement of Financial Position date. All other
liabilities shall be classified as non-current liabilities.
ABC LTD
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 31ST DECEMBER 2010
RWFm RWFm
Assets
Non-Current Assets
Property 150
Plant and Equipment 78
Intangible Assets 22
Investments 30
280
Current Assets
Non-Current Liabilities
Long-Term Borrowings 150
Long-Term Provisions 10
Total Non-Current Liabilities 160
Current Liabilities
Trade Payables 35
Accruals 4
Income Tax Payable 12
Total Current Liabilities 51
Total Equity and Liabilities 463
Financial Statements.
ALP Limited
Statement of Financial Position as at 31st May 2011
Assets RWF RWF
Non-Current Assets:
Cost 500,000
Less Accumulated Depreciation (100,000)
400,000
Current Assets
Inventory 125,000
Trade Receivables 112,000
Cash at Bank 95,000
332,000
Total Assets 732,000
Total comprehensive Income is the realised profit or loss for the period, plus other comprehensive
income.
Other comprehensive income is income and expenses that are not recognised in profit or loss.
That is, they are recorded in reserves rather than as an element of the realised profit for
the period. For example, other comprehensive income would include a change in revaluation
surplus.
PQR
Statement of Comprehensive Income for the Year Ended 31st December 2010
RWF000
Revenue X
Cost of sales (X)
Gross profit X
Administrative expenses (X)
Profit from operations X
Finance costs (X)
Investment income X
Profit before tax X
Income tax expense (X)
Profit for the year X
Other Comprehensive Income
Gain/Loss on revaluation of PPE X
Gain/Loss on available for sale investments X
Total comprehensive income for the year X
PQR
Statement of PLfor the year ended 31ST December 2010
RWF000
Revenue X
Cost of sales (X)
Gross profit X
Administrative expenses (X)
Profit from operations X
Finance costs (X)
Investment income X
Profit before tax X
Income tax expense (X)
Profit for the year X
RWF000
Profit for the Year X
Other comprehensive income
Gain/Loss on revaluation of PPE X
Gain/Loss on available for sale investments X
Total comprehensive income for the year X
When items of income and expense are material, their nature and amount shall be disclosed
separately. Examples of these would include:
An entity shall not present any items of income or expense as extraordinary items. The
description extraordinary items were used in the past to represent income and expenses arising
from events outside the ordinary activities of the business. IAS 1 has therefore abolished this
classification of items.
REQUIREMENT:
Prepare the Income Statement
SOLUTION:
Watt Limited - Income Statement for the year ended 31st March 2010
RWFm
Therefore, the statement of changes in equity provides a summary of all changes in equity
arising from transactions with owners, including the effect of share issues and dividends. Other
non-owner changes in equity are disclosed in aggregate only.
RWF
Balance at 1.1.10 X X X X X
Change in
accounting policy _ (X) (X)
XX
Restated Balance XX XX X XXX
Issue of shares
Revaluation gain
Transfer (X) X -
Profit for the year _ X (X) X (X)
Dividends
Balance at 31.12.10 X X X X X
_
An entity shall disclose the significant accounting policies used in preparing the financial
statements.
M. QUESTION/SOLUTION
Question – XYZ
The following items have been extracted from the trial balance of XYZ, a limited liability
company, as at 30th September 2010.
Cost 5 214,000
Accumulated Depreciation 5 88,700
Office Equipment: Additions during the year 5 48,000
Proceeds of sale of items during the year 5 12,600
Interest paid 2 30,000
Notes:
1. Closing inventory amounted to RWF219,600
2. Prepayments and accruals:
Prepayments Accruals
RWF RWF
4. Further bad debts totalling RWF8,000 are to be written off, and the closing allowance for doubtful
debts is to be equal to 5% of the final trade receivables figure. The bad and doubtful debt
expense is to be included in administrative expenses.
5. Office equipment:
Depreciation is to be provided at 20% per annum on the straight-line basis, with a full year’s
charge in the year of purchase and none in the year of sale.
During the year office equipment, which had cost RWF40,000 with accumulated
depreciation ofRWF26,800 was sold for RWF12,600.
All office equipment is used for administrative purposes.
REQUIREMENT:
Prepare the company’s Income Statement for the year ended 30th September 2010 in
accordance with IAS 1
XYZ Limited
Income Statement for the year ended 30th September 2010
RWF RWF
Sales Revenue 3,210,000
Cost of Sales (W1) (1,823,100)
Gross Profit 1,386,900
Distribution Costs (W1) (188,500)
OBJECTIVE
The objective of IAS 16 is to prescribe the accounting treatment for property, plant and equipment,
so that users of the financial statements can understand the nature of the entities investment in
such assets and any changes that have occurred in that investment.
The standard indicates that the main issues to be dealt with are:
• Are held for use in the production or supply of goods or services, for rental to others or for
administration purposes; and
• Are expected to be used during more than one period.
C. RECOGNITION
An item of property, plant and equipment should be recognised as an asset in the Statement of
Financial Position if, and only if:
• It is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the entity; and
• The cost of the item can be measured reliably.
The Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements also states that
having control over as asset is an important feature in the recognition of that asset in the accounts
(for example, legal ownership of an asset is not essential in establishing the existence of the
asset, as long as the entity can show that it controls the benefits which are expected to flow from
that asset, e.g. Finance Lease).
An entity controls an asset if it has the power to obtain the future economic benefits flowing from
that asset and also restrict the access of others to those benefits.
D. INITIAL MEASUREMENT
If an asset qualifies for recognition, then it should initially be measured at its cost.
Cost is the amount of cash or cash equivalents paid or the fair value of other consideration given
to acquire an asset at the time of acquisition or construction.
• The initial costs of dismantling and removing the item and restoring the site, if such an
obligation is placed on the entity (legally or constructively)
Administration and other general overheads are not included in the cost of the asset.
Likewise, the following are also excluded: training costs, advertising and promotional costs and
costs incurred while an asset, capable of being used as intended, is yet to be brought into use,
is left idle or is operating below full capacity.
[Note that in the case of self-constructed assets, the following are excluded from the cost of the
Question:
T.s Limited has recently acquired an item of plant. The details of this acquisition are:
RWF RWF
List price of plant 40,000
Trade discount applicable to T. Ltd 12.5%
Ancillary costs:
Shipping and handling costs 2,750
Pre-production testing 12,500
Maintenance contract for three years 24,000
Site preparation costs:
Electrical cable installation 14,000
Concrete reinforcement 4,500
Own labour costs 7,500 26,000
T.Ltd paid for the plant (excluding the ancillary costs) within four weeks and thus received a 3%
early settlement discount.
An error was made in installing the electrical cable. This error cost RWF6,000 and is
included in the RWF14,000 figure.
The plant is expected to last for 10 years. At the end of this period, there will be compulsory
costs of
RWF18,000 to dismantle the plant and restore the site. (Ignore discounting).
What is the initial cost of the plant that should be recognised in the Statement of Financial
Position?
Solution:
RWF RWF
List price of plant 240,000
Less trade discount (12.5%) (30,000)
210,000
Shipping and handling costs 2,750
Note:
Early settlement discount is a revenue item
Maintenance cost is also a revenue item
The electrical error must be charged to the income statement
E. SUBSEQUENT EXPENDITURE
The cost of day-to-day servicing of an asset is not included in the carrying amount of an asset.
This expenditure is referred to as “repairs and maintenance” and should be charged to the
income statement in the period it is incurred.
However, if part of an asset is replaced, e.g. new engine in a plane or new lining in a furnace,
then the cost of this replacement can be capitalised if the recognition criteria mentioned earlier
are met.
The part of the asset that is replaced must then be derecognised (with any resulting profit or loss
on disposal being calculated and recognised).
Some assets require ongoing and substantial expenditure for overhauling and restoring
components of an asset, for example:
A provision for this expenditure cannot be made. Rather, the cost is capitalised and depreciated
separately over its individual useful economic life. It is important to note that this variety of
subsequent expenditure can only be treated in this way if the asset is treated as separate
components for depreciation purposes.
If the asset is not accounted for as several different components, this kind of subsequent
expenditure must be treated as normal repairs and renewals and charged to the income statement
as it is incurred.
Example
S. Limited purchases a plane that has an expected useful life of 20 years, and has no residual
value. The plane requires a substantial overhaul every 5 years (i.e. at the end of years 5, 10, and
15). The plane cost RWF45 million and RWF5 million of this figure is estimated to be attributable
When the first overhaul is carried out at the end of year 5 at a cost of, say, RWF10 million, this
cost is capitalised and depreciated to the date of the next overhaul.
This means that total depreciation for years 6 to 10 will be RWF4 million (RWF10m/5 years +
RWF40m/20 years).
The fair value of property is based on its market value, as assessed by a professionally qualified
valuer. The fair value of plant and equipment is usually their market value, determined by
appraisal.
If there is no market based evidence of fair value because the asset is of a specialised nature
and is rarely sold, then the fair value of that asset will have to be estimated using an income or
a depreciated replacement cost approach.
All revaluations should be made at such a frequency that the carrying amount does not differ
materially from the fair value at the Statement of Financial Position date.
If an item of property, plant and equipment is revalued, then the entire class of property, plant and
equipment to which the asset belongs shall be revalued.
However, if the revaluation gain reverses a previous revaluation loss, which was recognised as
an expense, then the gain should be recognised in the income statement (but only to the extent
of the previous loss of the same asset). Any excess over the amount of the original loss goes to
the Revaluation Surplus.
Example:
GJ Limited has land in its books with a carrying value of RWF14 million. Two years ago the land
was worth RWF16 million. The loss was recorded in the Income Statement. This year the land
has been valued at RWF20 million.
Thus:
RWFm RWFm
Debit Land 6
Credit Income Statement 2
Credit Revaluation Surplus 4
However, the decrease should be debited directly to the revaluation surplus to the extent of any
credit balance existing in the revaluation surplus in respect of that asset.
Example:
G J Limited has land in its books with a carrying value of RWF20 million. Two years ago the
land was worth RWF15 million. The gain was credited to the Revaluation Surplus. This year
the land has been valued at RWF13 million. Thus:
RWFm RWFm
Debit Revaluation Surplus 5
Debit Income Statement 2
Credit Land 7
If however, the asset is subject to depreciation, then the treatment of revaluation surpluses
becomes a little more complicated.
If an asset is revalued upwards, then the annual depreciation charge will be greater. This will
reduce profits to lower than they would be if no revaluation took place. Consequently, the
accumulated reserves will also be lower.
The revaluation surplus will be realised if and when the asset is sold or disposed of in the
future. But, it can be argued that the surplus is also being realised when the asset is being
• The new depreciation charge on the revalued amount of the asset; and
• The old depreciation charge on the cost of the asset.
Example:
S. Limited bought an item of machinery for RWF100,000 at the start of 2007. The asset had an
estimated useful life of 5 years, with no residual value.
At the start of 2009, the asset was revalued to RWF120,000. There was no change in its
expected useful life.
Solution:
RWF
At 1st January 2009:
Carrying amount of asset 60,000
Revalued to 120,000
Revaluation surplus 60,000
Thus:
RWF RWF
Debit Machinery 60,000
Credit Revaluation Reserve 60,000
To compensate for this, S. Limited can “release” from the revaluation reserve to the accumulated
reserves an amount to reflect the “realisation” of the revaluation reserve. The revaluation surplus
is released on a straight- line basis over the remaining life of the machine, i.e.
RWF60,000
= RWF20,000 per annum
3 years
Thus:
RWF RWF
Debit Revaluation Reserve 20,000
Credit Accumulated Reserves 20,000
[This would occur in the Statement of Changes in Equity and is not part of the profit or loss.]
The depreciation charge changes from the date of the revaluation onwards.
Example:
On the 31st December 2008, S.B. Limited had the following shown in its Statement of Financial
[Note: this means that the annual charge is RWF100,000 per annum and thus, the buildings were
acquired 10 years previously. At the end of December 2007, the buildings had an estimated
useful life of 40 years remaining.]
The building is revalued to RWF5,925,000 on the 30th June 2009. There is no change in its
remaining estimated useful life.
Show the extracts from the financial statements for the year ended 31st December 2009.
Solution:
Depreciation charge for year:
RWF RWF
5,000,000 x 2% x 6/12 =
The asset is depreciated as normal up to the date of the revaluation. Thereafter, the revalued
amount is written off over the remaining life of the asset.
Thus:
Income Statement
RWF
Depreciation 125,000
Statement of Financial Position
Valuation at 30th June 2009 5,925,000
Accumulated depreciation 75,000
Carrying amount 5,850,000
RWF
Carrying amount 3,950,000
Revalued amount 5,925,000
Revaluation surplus 1,975,000
The revaluation surplus can be “released” to accumulated reserves over the remaining life of
the asset, i.e.
RWF1,975,000
= RWF50,000 per annum
39.5yeas
As an alternative to releasing the revaluation surplus over the assets remaining useful life,
the surplus could instead be transferred in its entirety to retained earnings when the asset is
eventually derecognised.
G. DERECOGNITION
If an asset is sold, scrapped or withdrawn from use (so that no future economic benefits are
expected) then the asset must be removed from the Statement of Financial Position.
Any gain or loss arising on disposal must be calculated and included as part of profit or loss for
period. The gain or loss on disposal is the difference between:
[Note: any consideration receivable on disposal of an item of property, plant and equipment is
measured at its fair value.]
H. DEPRECIATION
Each part of an item of property, plant and equipment that has a cost that is significant in relation
to the total cost of the item should be depreciated separately.
This means that an entity should allocate the amount initially recognised in respect of an item of
property, plant and equipment and each part should be separately depreciated.
For example, a company acquires a property at a cost of RWF100 million. For depreciation
purposes, the asset has been separated into the following elements:
The depreciation charge for a period should be recognised in the profit or loss for the period. It
is usually an expense item. But if the asset is used in the process of producing goods for sale,
then the depreciation of that asset is included in the cost of sales.
There are situations however, when the depreciation of any asset should be included in the
carrying amount of another asset. For example, under IAS 38 Intangible Assets, depreciation
of assets used for development purposes may be included in the cost of the intangible asset
(development costs) capitalised in the Statement of Financial Position.
So, if the future economic benefits embodied in an asset are absorbed in producing other assets,
then the depreciation charge constitutes part of the cost of the other asset and thus is included
in its carrying amount.
The entity should review both the residual value of the asset and its expected useful life on an
annual basis. If necessary, these should be revised (as a change in estimate, in accordance
with IAS 8).
Because an asset is being repaired or maintained does not mean it should avoid depreciation.
Depreciation begins when the asset is available for use and ceases at the earlier date of:
Land, with some exceptions, has an unlimited useful life and so it is not subject to depreciation.
Buildings have a useful life and, thus, are depreciated.
If an asset is revalued, the revalued amount should be depreciated over its remaining useful life,
starting at the date of its revaluation.
If the useful life of an asset is revised, the carrying value of the asset should be written off over
the remaining life, starting with the period in which the change is made.
Example:
S. Limited purchased an asset on 1st January 2008. It had an expected useful life of 5 years. Its
residual value is immaterial. Its cost was RWF500,000. At 31st December 2010, the remaining
useful life is revised to 7 years.
Thus the depreciation charge in the accounts for 2010 will be as follows:
Net Book Value at 31st December 2009 RWF 300,000
Remaining useful life at the start of the year 2010 (i.e. 7 years from the end of this year + this
year) 8 years
(Note, the estimated useful life at the year 2010 is 7 years, but this information is used to compute
this year’s depreciation charge too.)
I. DISCLOSURE
For each class of property, plant and equipment, the following information must be disclosed:
• Existence of restrictions on title and whether assets have been pledged as security for
liabilities and the amounts involved
• Amount of expenditure recognised in the course of the assets construction
• Date of revaluation
• Whether an independent valuer was used
• Methods and assumptions used in estimating the fair value
• The extent to which estimates were based on active markets or other techniques which were
used
• The carrying amount of the asset if the cost model had been used
• The revaluation surplus
A. INTRODUCTION
IAS 20 sets out the accounting procedures to be followed when dealing with government grants.
It also outlines the disclosure requirements necessary upon receipt of such grants.
The standard recognises that government assistance can come in a variety of forms and may be
motivated by different government objectives. Indeed some or all of the grant aid may become
• Outline an appropriate accounting treatment for the resources received by the entity from
government sources.
• Provide an indication of the extent to which an entity has benefited from such
assistance in the accounting period.
B. DEFINITIONS
Government refers to government, government agencies and similar bodies whether local,
national or international.
Government Grants are assistance by government in the form of transfers of resources to an entity
in return for past or future compliance with certain conditions relating to the operating activities of
the entity. They exclude those forms of government assistance which cannot reasonably have a
value placed upon them and transactions with government which cannot be distinguished from
the normal trading transactions of the entity. (See Section G).
Grants related to assets are government grants whose primary condition is that an entity qualifying
for them should purchase, construct or otherwise acquire long-term assets. Subsidiary conditions
may also be attached restricting the type or location of the assets or the periods during which
they are to be acquired or held.
Grants related to income are government grants other than those related to assets.
Forgivable loans are loans which the lender undertakes to waive repayment of under
certain prescribed conditions.
C. RECOGNITION
Government grants should not be recognised in the financial statements until there is
reasonable assurance that:
• The entity will comply with the conditions attaching to them; and
• The grants will be received.
The standard states that the manner in which the grant is received will not affect the accounting
treatment. For example, an entity may receive cash or alternatively the government may reduce
a liability owed to it by the entity. Both constitute government grants and must be treated as such.
Note that a forgivable loan from government is also treated as a government grant when there is
reasonable assurance that the entity will meet the terms for forgiveness of the loan.
Example:
The Ministry of Infrastructure transfer title of a building to B. Limited, as part of an overall package
to encourage the development of a research and development facility to aid the mining industry.
The building has a fair value of RWF100,000.
Solution:
This constitutes a government grant. Thus in the books of B. Limited:
RWF RWF
DR Land and Buildings Account 100,000
D. ACCOUNTING TREATMENT
Government grants should be recognised as income over the periods necessary to match them
with the related costs which they are intended to compensate, on a systematic basis.
Example
FG. Ltd. obtained a grant of RWF30 million to compensate it for costs incurred in planting trees
and hedgerows over a period of 3 years. FG. ltd. will incur costs as follows:
(Thus total costs expected to be incurred come to RWF20 million and grant aid of RWF30 million
has been received).
Applying IAS 20, the grant will be recognised as income over the period which matches the cost,
using a systematic and rational basis. As a result, the total grant recognised per annum will be:
2. For grants related to assets, there are two allowable accounting treatments:
Note that regardless of which method is used the cash flow statement would normally show the
purchase of an asset and the receipt of a grant as two separate cash flows.
Example:
S. Limited receives a 50% grant towards the cost of a machine, which has a cash price of
RWF100,000. The machine has an estimated useful life of five years and its residual value is
expected to be immaterial.
Solution:
The asset cost is RWF100,000 and the grant is RWF50,000. Thus, the net cost to the company
is RWF50,000.
Option 1:
On acquiring the asset:
RWF RWF
DR Machine Account 100,000
CR Bank Account 100,000
On receiving the grant:
RWF RWF
DR Bank Account 50,000
CR Government Grant Account 50,000
Thus, the annual depreciation charge is: RWF100,000 = 20,000
5yeas
The annual amortisation of grant is:
RWF50,000 = 5 years
RWF RWF
DR Machine Account 100,000
CR Bank Account 100,000
On receiving the grant:
RWF RWF
DR Bank Account 50,000
CR Machine Account 50,000
IFRS 16 Leases
It is a contract between the lessee and the lessee where the lessor offers an asset to the lessee
which he pays for in installment
Objective
This Standard sets out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation
and disclosure of leases. The objective is to ensure that lessees and lessors provide
relevant information in a manner that faithfully represents those transactions. This
information gives a basis for users of financial statements to assess the effect that
leases have on the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of an entity.
An entity shall consider the terms and conditions of contracts and all relevant
facts and circumstances when applying this Standard. An entity shall apply
this Standard consistently to contracts with similar characteristics and in
similar circumstances.
Scope
An entity shall apply this Standard to all leases, including leases of right-of-use assets in a
sublease, except for:
• leases to explore for or use minerals, oil, natural gas and similar nonregenerative resources;
• leases of biological assets within the scope of IAS 41 Agriculture held by a lessee;
• service concession arrangements within the scope of IFRIC 12 Service Concession
Arrangements
• licences of intellectual property granted by a lessor within the scope of IFRS 15 Revenue from
Contracts with Customers; and
• rights held by a lessee under licensing agreements within the scope of IAS 38 Intangible
Assets for such items as motion picture films, video recordings, plays, manuscripts, patents
and copyrights.
A lessee may, but is not required to, apply this Standard to leases of intangible asset
Recognition exemptions
Lessee
For a contract that contains a lease component and one or more additional
lease or non-lease components, a lessee shall allocate the consideration in the contract to each
lease component on the basis of the relative stand-alone price of the lease component and the
aggregate stand-alone price of the non-lease components.
Lessee Recognition
At the commencement date, a lessee shall recognise a right-of-use asset and a lease liability.
• the amount of the initial measurement of the lease liability, as described in paragraph 26;
• any lease payments made at or before the commencement date, less any lease incentives
received;
• any initial direct costs incurred by the lessee; and
• an estimate of costs to be incurred by the lessee in dismantling and removing the underlying
asset, restoring the site on which it is located or restoring the underlying asset to the condition
required by the terms and conditions of the lease, unless those costs are incurred to
produce inventories. The lessee incurs the obligation for those costs either at the
commencement date or as a consequence of having used the underlying asset during a
particular period
• fixed payments (including in-substance fixed payments as described less any lease incentives
receivable;
• variable lease payments that depend on an index or a rate, initially measured using the index
or rate as at the commencement date (as described in paragraph 28);
• amounts expected to be payable by the lessee under residual value
guarantees;
• the exercise price of a purchase option if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise that
option and
• payments of penalties for terminating the lease, if the lease term reflects the lessee exercising
an option to terminate the lease.
Subsequent measurement
Subsequent measurement of the right-of-use asset
After the commencement date, a lessee shall measure the right-of-use asset
applying a cost model, unless it applies either of the measurement models
Cost model
To apply a cost model, a lessee shall measure the right‑of‑use asset at cost:
• less any accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses; and
• adjusted for any remeasurement of the lease liability specified in
paragraph 36
• A lessee shall apply the depreciation requirements in IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment in
depreciating the right-of-use asset,
48 I1.2 FINANCIAL REPORTING CPA EXAMINATION
STUDY MANUAL
Other measurement models
If a lessee applies the fair value model in IAS 40 Investment Property to its
investment property, the lessee shall also apply that fair value model to rightof-use assets that
meet the definition of investment property in IAS 40.
If right-of-use assets relate to a class of property, plant and equipment to which the lessee
applies the revaluation model in IAS 16, a lessee may elect to
apply that revaluation model to all of the right-of-use assets that relate to that class of property,
plant and equipment.
• there is a change in the lease term, A lessee shall determine the revised lease payments on
the basis of the revised lease term; or
• there is a change in the assessment of an option to purchase the underlying asset, assessed
considering the events and circumstances described in the context of a purchase option. A
lessee shall determine the revised lease payments to reflect the change in amounts payable
under the purchase option.
A lessee shall remeasure the lease liability by discounting the revised lease payments, if either:
• there is a change in the amounts expected to be payable under a residual value guarantee. A
lessee shall determine the revised lease payments to reflect the change in amounts expected
to be payable under the residual value guarantee.
• there is a change in future lease payments resulting from a change in an index or a rate used
Lease modifications
A lessee shall account for a lease modification as a separate lease if both:
• the modification increases the scope of the lease by adding the right to use one or more
underlying assets; and
• the consideration for the lease increases by an amount commensurate with the stand-alone
price for the increase in scope and any appropriate adjustments to that stand-alone price to
reflect the circumstances of the particular contract.
For a lease modification that is not accounted for as a separate lease, at the effective date of
the lease modification a lessee shall:
For a lease modification that is not accounted for as a separate lease, the lessee shall account
for the re-measurement of the lease liability by:
• decreasing the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset to reflect the partial or full termination
of the lease for lease modifications that decrease the scope of the lease. The lessee shall
recognise in profit or loss any gain or loss relating to the partial or full termination of the
lease.
• making a corresponding adjustment to the right-of-use asset for all other lease modifications.
Presentation
A lessee shall either present in the statement of financial position, or disclose in the notes:
• right-of-use assets separately from other assets. If a lessee does not present right-of-use
assets separately in the statement of financial position, the lessee shall:
• include right-of-use assets within the same line item as that within which the
corresponding underlying assets would be presented if they were owned; and
• disclose which line items in the statement of financial position include those right-of-
use assets. lease liabilities separately from other liabilities.
If the lessee does not present lease liabilities separately in the statement of financial position,
the lessee shall disclose which line items in the statement of financial position include those
liabilities.
In the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, a lessee shall present
• cash payments for the principal portion of the lease liability within financing activities;
• cash payments for the interest portion of the lease liability applying the requirements in IAS 7
Statement of Cash Flows for interest paid; and
• short-term lease payments, payments for leases of low-value assets and variable lease
payments not included in the measurement of the lease liability within operating activities
Disclosure
The objective of the disclosures is for lessees to disclose information in the notes that, together
with the information provided in the statement of financial position, statement of profit or loss
and statement of cash flows, gives a basis for users of financial statements to assess the effect
that leases have on the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the lessee.
A lessee shall disclose information about its leases for which it is a lessee in a single note or
separate section in its financial statements. However, a lessee need not duplicate information
that is already presented elsewhere in the financial statements, provided that the information is
incorporated by cross reference in the single note or separate section about leases.
A lessee shall disclose the following amounts for the reporting period:
Lessor
Classification of leases
A lessor shall classify each of its leases as either an operating lease or a finance lease.
A lease is classified as a finance lease if it transfers substantially all the risks and rewards
incidental to ownership of an underlying asset. A lease is classified as an operating lease if it
does not transfer substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of an underlying
asset. Whether a lease is a finance lease or an operating lease depends on them substance of
the transaction rather than the form of the contract. Examples of situations that individually or in
combination would normally lead to a lease being classified as a finance lease are:
• the lease transfers ownership of the underlying asset to the lessee by the end of the lease
term;
• the lessee has the option to purchase the underlying asset at a price that is expected to be
sufficiently lower than the fair value at the date the option becomes exercisable for it to be
reasonably certain, at the inception date, that the option will be exercised;
Indicators of situations that individually or in combination could also lead to a lease being
classified as a finance lease are:
• if the lessee can cancel the lease, the lessor’s losses associated with the cancellation are
borne by the lessee; eriod by class of underlying as gains or losses from the fluctuation in
the fair value of the residual accrue to the lessee (for example, in the form of a rent rebate
equaling most of the sales proceeds at the end of the lease); and
• the lessee has the ability to continue the lease for a secondary period at
Finance leases
Initial measurement
The lessor shall use the interest rate implicit in the lease to measure the net investment in
the lease. In the case of a sublease, if the interest rate implicit in the sublease cannot be
readily determined, an intermediate lessor may use the discount rate used for the head
lease (adjusted for any initial direct costs associated with the sublease) to measure the net
investment in the sublease.
Initial direct costs, other than those incurred by manufacturer or dealer lessors, are included
in the initial measurement of the net investment in the lease and reduce the amount of income
recognised over the lease term. The interest rate implicit in the lease is defined in such a way
that the initial direct costs are included automatically in the net investment in the lease; there is
no need to add them separately.
Initial measurement of the lease payments included in the net investment in the lease At the
commencement date, the lease payments included in the measurement of the net investment
in the lease comprise the following payments for the right to use the underlying asset during
the lease term that are not received at the commencement date: t that is substantially lower
than market rent.
• revenue being the fair value of the underlying asset, or, if lower, the present value of the lease
payments accruing to the lessor, discounted using a market rate of interest;
• the cost of sale being the cost, or carrying amount if different, of the underlying asset less the
present value of the unguaranteed residual value; and
• selling profit or loss (being the difference between revenue and the cost of sale) in accordance
with its policy for outright sales to which IFRS 15 applies. A manufacturer or dealer lessor shall
52 I1.2 FINANCIAL REPORTING CPA EXAMINATION
STUDY MANUAL
recognise selling profit or loss on a finance lease at the commencement date, regardless of
whether the lessor transfers the underlying asset as described in IFRS 15.
Subsequent measurement
A lessor shall recognise finance income over the lease term, based on a pattern reflecting a
constant periodic rate of return on the lessor’s net investment in the lease. A lessor aims to
allocate finance income over the lease term on a systematic and rational basis. A lessor shall
apply the lease payments relating to the period against the gross investment in the lease to
reduce both the principal and the unearned finance income.
A lessor shall apply the derecognition and impairment requirements in IFRS 9 to the net
investment in the lease. A lessor shall review regularly estimated unguaranteed residual
values used in computing the gross investment in the lease. If there has been a reduction
in the estimated unguaranteed residual value, the lessor shall revise the income allocation
over the lease term and recognise immediately any reduction in respect of amounts accrued.
A lessor that classifies an asset under a finance lease as held for sale (or includes it in a disposal
group that is classified as held for sale) applying IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and
Discontinued Operations shall account for the asset in accordance with that Standard.
Lease modifications
A lessor shall account for a modification to a finance lease as a separate lease if both:
• the modification increases the scope of the lease by adding the right to
use one or more underlying assets; and
• the consideration for the lease increases by an amount commensurate with the stand-alone
price for the increase in scope and any appropriate adjustments to that stand-alone price to
reflect the circumstances of the particular contract.
For a modification to a finance lease that is not accounted for as a separate lease, a lessor
shall account for the modification as follows:
• if the lease would have been classified as an operating lease had the modification been in
effect at the inception date, the lessor shall:
• account for the lease modification as a new lease from the effective date of the
modification; and
• measure the carrying amount of the underlying asset as the net investment in the
lease immediately before the effective date of the lease modification.
• (b) otherwise, the lessor shall apply the requirements of IFRS 9.
Operating leases
Recognition and measurement
A lessor shall recognise lease payments from operating leases as income on either a straight-
line basis or another systematic basis. The lessor shall apply another systematic basis if that
basis is more representative of the pattern in which benefit from the use of the underlying asset
is diminished.
A lessor shall recognise costs, including depreciation, incurred in earning the lease income as
an expense.
A lessor shall add initial direct costs incurred in obtaining an operating lease to the carrying
amount of the underlying asset and recognise those costs as an expense over the lease term
on the same basis as the lease income.
Lease modifications
A lessor shall account for a modification to an operating lease as a new lease from the effective
date of the modification, considering any prepaid or accrued lease payments relating to the
original lease as part of the leasepayments for the new lease.
Presentation
A lessor shall present underlying assets subject to operating leases in its statement of financial
position according to the nature of the underlying asset.
Disclosure
The objective of the disclosures is for lessors to disclose information in the notes that, together
with the information provided in the statement of financial position, statement of profit or loss
and statement of cash flows, gives a basis for users of financial statements to assess the effect
that leases have on the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the
lessor. A lessor shall disclose the following amounts for the reporting period:
• the seller-lessee shall measure the right-of-use asset arising from the leaseback at the
proportion of the previous carrying amount of the asset that relates to the right of use retained
by the seller-lessee. Accordingly, the seller-lessee shall recognise only the amount of any
gain or loss that relates to the rights transferred to the buyer-lessor.
Calculate the value at which the asset will be initially recorded in the accounts.
Solution
First, calculate the present value of the minimum lease payments.
Year Lease Payment 12% Discount Factor Present Value
1 3,000 0.893 2,679
RWF
Fair Value (cash price) 10,900
PV of lease payments 10,815
Thus:
Dr Leased Asset Account 10,815
Dr Non-Current Assets
Cr Leasing Obligation
With fair value of the leased asset (or the present value of the minimum lease payments, if lower)
The leased asset is subsequently depreciated over the shorter of:
[Note: The lease term may comprise both a primary period and a secondary period. The
secondary period is included in the lease term if it is reasonably certain at the beginning of the
lease that this period will be exercised]
This means that the lease payment must be split into its component parts:
Finance cost, charged to Statement of
Comprehensive Income
Lease Payment
In calculating the amount of the finance charge, there are two main methods:
The aim of each method is to allocate the finance cost in such a way as to produce a reasonably
constant periodic rate of return on the outstanding balance of the leasing obligation.
[
Example 1
Company Y Limited acquires a machine under a finance lease agreement. The machine has a
cash price of
RWF6,000.
Thus,
RWF
Cash price 6,000
Deposit 900
Amount financed by leasing 5,100
Balance Sheet:
Leased assets (6,000 – 2,000) 4,000
Non-current liabilities
Leasing obligations 1,885
n(n+1)
Note: An alternative, quicker way to calculate the sum-of-digits is to use the formula:
2
3(4)
Where n = number of years in the lease. In the above example, this becomes: =6
2
Next, calculate the total interest payable over the life of the lease:
RWF
Total amount financed 5,100
Total repayments (RWF2,100 x 3) 6,300
Total interest 1,200
Balance Sheet:
Leased assets 4,000
Non-current liabilities
Leasing obligations 1,900 Total 3,600 i.e.
Note: There is a slight difference in the finance charge, and therefore also in the closing
balance of the liability, between the two methods.
Example 2
Company Z Limited acquired a machine by way of a lease agreement. The fair value of the
machine was RWF15,850. Estimated life of the machine is 4 years.
Solution
Is this lease a finance lease?
RWF
PV of minimum lease payments = 15,850
Cash price (fair value) = 15,850
It is a finance lease
Initially,
RWF RWF
Dr Leased machinery 15,850
Cr Leasing obligation 15,850
Then, to calculate the finance charge and the closing balance of the liability (using the actuarial
method):
Year Opening Balance Lease Rentals Closing
10% Interest Balance
1 15,850 1,585 5,000 12,435
2 12,435 1,243 5,000 8,678
RWF
Finance charge 1,585
RWF15,850
Depreciation 3,962
4 years
B. EXCLUSIONS
The standard does not apply to:
C. DEFINITION
Investment property is property (land or buildings or part of a building) held to earn rental or for
capital appreciation or both, rather than for:
Note that the standard says it is “property held”. This means that the entity does not have to own
title to the property. Investment property held under a finance lease is included in the definition.
Recent changes to IAS 40 have seen the possible inclusion in the definition of property held
under an operating lease. Property held by a lessee under an operating lease shall qualify
as an investment property if, and only if, the property would otherwise meet the definition of
an investment property and the lessee uses the “fair value” model for the asset recognised.
It should be noted, however, that once this model is selected for one property held under an
operating lease, all property classified as investment property should be accounted for using the
“fair value” model.
This aspect of recognising investment property was included in the Standard in response to the
situation in some countries where properties are held under long leases that provide rights that
are broadly similar to those of a purchaser. The inclusion in the Standard of such interests allows
the lessee to measure such assets at fair value.
The nature of investment properties is different from other types of land and buildings and
consequently the accounting treatment will be different also. By earning rentals or capital
appreciation (or both), investment properties generate cash flows that are mostly independent of
other assets held by the entity.
• It is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the entity from the property, and
• The cost of the property can be measured reliably.
An investment property should be measured initially at its cost. Transaction costs should be
included in the cost of the property.
The cost of a purchased investment property includes its purchase price and any other directly
attributable expenditure, for example:
• Legal fees
• Other transaction costs
The cost of a self-constructed investment property is its cost at the date when the construction
is completed. (Up to the date of completion, the property would be accounted for using IAS 16).
If the property is held under a lease, then the asset should be measured initially at the lower of
the:
E. SUBSEQUENT MEASUREMENT
IAS 40 allows the entity to choose from two different options when accounting for the subsequent
measurement of its investment properties. These options are:
• Cost model, or
• Fair Value Model
F. COST MODEL
Using this approach, all investment properties are treated like other properties under IAS 16
Property, Plant and
Equipment i.e. shown at: Cost
Less Accumulated Depreciation
[Note, that if the investment property is held for sale as defined in IFRS 5 Non-Current Assets
Held For Sale and Discontinued Operations, the investment property should be measured in
accordance with that standard.]
The fair value is the price at which property could be exchanged between knowledgeable,
willing parties in an arm’s length transaction.
This fair value should reflect market conditions at the Statement of Financial Position date.
Thus, the fair value is usually calculated by comparing current prices for similar properties in
an active market.
In estimating fair value, the entity should consider a number of factors and sources:
• Current prices in an active market for properties of a different nature, condition or location,
adjusted to reflect those differences
• Recent prices of similar properties on less active markets, adjusted to reflect changes in
economic conditions
• Discounted cash flow projections based on reliable estimates of future cash flows.
[In exceptional circumstances, if the fair value of the property cannot be estimated reliably on a
continuing basis, the property should be measured using the cost model in IAS 16. This policy
should be applied until the property is disposed of.]
There is a major difference between the fair value policy allowed in IAS 40 and the revaluation
policy allowed under IAS 16.
In IAS 40, all gains and losses on revaluation to fair value go to the Statement of Comprehensive
Income. In IAS 16, if an asset is revalued to fair value, gains are credited to a revaluation reserve.
The IASB take the view that the fair value model is appropriate for investment properties as this
is consistent with accounting for financial assets held as investments require by IAS 39 Financial
Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.
Example:
XYZ purchases a property in Kigali for RWF10m on 1st June 2010. The property was purchased
for both rental income and capital appreciation. The building has a useful life of 50 years.
Estimates of the market value of the building on 31st May 2011 show a value of RWF12m.
What is the impact on the financial statements for the year ended 31st May 2011 if the company
uses:
RWF RWF
Dr Investment Property 2m
Cr Statement of Comprehensive Income 2m
Thus, there is a gain in the Statement of Comprehensive Income of RWF2m, increasing profit
for the period.
In the Statement of Financial Position, the investment property will have a carrying
amount of RWF10,000,000 - RWF200,000 = RWF9,800,000
Once an entity chooses a method of accounting for investment properties, it must be consistent
in that choice.
IAS 40 goes on to state that it considers a change from the fair value to the cost model resulting
in a more appropriate presentation as “highly unlikely”.
Furthermore, an entity is “encouraged but not required” to use the services of an experienced
independent valuer with recognised relevant professional qualifications when determining the
fair value of its investment properties.
[All entities must determine the fair value of investment property, regardless of the accounting
treatment. If an entity uses the cost model, it must still disclose the fair value of the property in
the notes to the financial statements.]
I. TRANSFERS
Transfers to or from investment property can only be made when there is a change in use.
There are a number of possibilities:
Example
W. Ltd purchased a property on 1st January 2009 for RWF3,000,000. W.Ltd intended to renovate
the property and let the building to a government department, due to locate in the area under
its decentralisation programme. A further RWF600,000 was spent over the next 11 months in
getting the building ready for letting. No lease had been signed by the government department.
The building was ready for tenant occupation on 1st December
2009.
The valuation of the completed property on 31st December 2009 was RWF4,000,000.
However, due to unforeseen budgetary difficulties, the government shelved its decentralisation
plan and the property remained unoccupied.
In February 2010, the property was valued at RWF4,200,000 and W.Ltd decided immediately
to relocate its head office to this property. W Ltd secured tenants for its old headquarters. The
book value of that head office was RWF3,000,000 and the market value at the date of letting in
February 2010 was RWF3,600,000.
How should W Ltd account for these property movements under IAS 40 and IAS 16, assuming
the company implements the Fair Value Model and the Revaluation Model, respectively?
When the property was acquired in 2009, it was the intention of W Ltd to let the property out to
a government department. The property was held to acquire rentals and thus, qualifies as an
investment property under IAS 40. The acquisition cost, together with the cost of renovation,
which totalled RWF3,600,000, should be included as investment property in the Statement of
Financial Position.
At 31st December 2009, the property is revalued to its fair value of RWF4,000,000 and the gain
of RWF400,000 should be recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income for that year.
At the time of the transfer from investment property to PPE, the fair value is deemed to be the “cost”
of the property under its new classification. The increase from its book value of RWF4,000,000 to
its fair value of RWF4,200,000 (i.e. RWF200,000) should be recorded in the calculation of profit
for the period.
In addition, W Ltd secured tenants for its old Head Office building. Again, there is a change in the
status of that building as it is now meets the definition of an investment property, and is no longer
PPE. Thus, it will now be dealt with under IAS 40.
IAS 16 applies up to the date of the transfer from PPE to investment property. Any difference
arising between the carrying value under IAS 16 at that date and the fair value is accounted for
as a revaluation under IAS 16.
The carrying value of the property was RWF3,000,000 and the market value in February 2010
was RWF3,600,000. Therefore, the increase of RWF600,000 is recorded as a revaluation surplus
prior to reclassification. It is not included in the profit calculation for the period.
IAS 40 points out, however, that some properties comprise a portion that is held for rentals and/
or capital appreciation and another portion that is owner-occupied.
If these portions could be sold separately, (or leased out separately under a finance lease) an
entity accounts for the portions separately. If the portions cannot be sold separately, the property
is an investment property only if an insignificant portion is held for use in the production or supply
of goods or services or for administration purposes.
The term “insignificant” is not defined and is left to subjective judgement. However, in other
Standards, indications are that 2% may be an applicable level.
In the case of groups of companies, where one group member leases a property to another
group member, then at group or consolidation level, the property is classified as owner occupied.
However, at an individual company level, the owner of the property should treat it as an investment
property. Thus, appropriate adjustments would need to be made in the group accounts.
K. DISPOSALS
Gains or losses on disposal are calculated in the usual way, i.e.
• Net Disposal Proceeds
• Less Carrying Amount of the Asset
Such gains or losses should be recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income, in the
period of the disposal, (unless IAS 17 requires otherwise on a sale or leaseback).
• Whether the fair value model or cost model has been applied.
• If it applies the fair value model, whether, and in what circumstances, property held under
operating leases are classified and accounted for as investment property.
• If classification is difficult, the criteria used to distinguish investment property from owner
occupied property.
• The methods and assumptions applied in determining fair value.
• The extent to which the fair value is based on a valuation by an independent, qualified,
experienced valuer. If there has been no such valuation, this fact must be disclosed.
• The amounts recognised in profit or loss for:
Cost Model
If the cost model is being applied, the entity must disclose, in addition to other disclosures
mentioned above:
• The depreciation methods used
• The useful lives or depreciation rates used
• The gross carrying amount and the accumulated depreciation (including any impairment
losses) at the beginning and end of the period
• A reconciliation of the carrying amount at the beginning and end of the period, showing:
A. OBJECTIVE
To outline the accounting treatment for intangible assets that are not dealt with specifically in
another standard.
B. EXCLUSIONS
IAS 38 does not apply to:
C. DEFINITION
An intangible asset is an identifiable non-monetary asset without physical substance. Examples
of such assets, which come within the scope of IAS 38 are:
• Brand Names
• Mastheads and Publishing Titles
• Computer Software
• Licences and Franchises
• Copyrights and Patents
• Must be separable, i.e. it is capable of being separated or divided from the entity and sold,
transferred, licensed, rented or exchanged, either individually or together with a related
contract, asset or liability;
In addition, the ability of the entity to control an asset is important in determining whether to
recognise that asset in the accounts. An entity controls an asset if it has the power to obtain the
future economic benefits flowing from that asset and also restrict the access of others to those
benefits.
Usually, the ability to control these benefits derives from enforceable legal rights, but IAS 38
recognises that there are potentially other ways to control these benefits, though admittedly it
is more difficult to demonstrate control in the absence of legal rights. An example given in the
Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements of such a situation is
know-how obtained from a development activity which may meet the definition of an asset when,
by keeping that know-how secret, an entity controls the benefits that are expected to flow from it.
D. ACCOUNTING TREATMENT
IAS 38 requires that intangible assets be recognised at cost in the financial statements if:
• It is probable that future economic benefits attributable to the asset will flow to the
organisation, and
• The cost of the asset can be measured reliably.
The cost of the asset refers to the amount of cash or cash equivalents paid or the fair value of
other consideration given (e.g. equity shares) to acquire an asset at the time of its acquisition.
• Purchase price (including irrecoverable taxes / duties less discounts and rebates) and
• Directly attributable costs of preparing the asset for use (these can include items such as
professional fees, costs of testing and employees’ benefits)
[Note: if the intangible asset is acquired in an acquisition, then the fair value of the asset at the
date of acquisition is used in accounting for the business combination.]
The fair value of an asset is the amount for which that asset could be exchanged between
knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm’s length transaction.
The fair value is easy to determine if there is an active market for the asset type. If an active
market does not exist, then the fair value will have to be estimated. In determining this amount
the entity should consider the outcome of recent transactions for similar assets. An active
Alternatively, the entity can recognise the asset initially at a nominal amount plus any expenditure
that is directly attributable to preparing the asset for its intended use.
F. EXCHANGE OF ASSETS
An intangible asset may be acquired for a non-monetary asset or assets, or by way of a
combination of monetary and non-monetary assets.
If the acquired asset is not measured at fair value, its cost is measured at the carrying amount
of the asset given up.
• Determining whether and when the asset will generate future economic benefits, and
• Determining the cost of the asset reliably
The standard does not prohibit, per se, the recognition of internally generated intangible assets
but it does specifically mention that internally generated brands, publishing titles, customer lists
and items similar in substance shall not be recognised as intangible assets.
This is because expenditure on these items cannot be distinguished from the cost of developing
the business as a whole.
To determine whether an internally generated intangible asset should be recognised, IAS 38
says that the entity should classify the generation of the asset into:
Research and development activities are aimed at the development of knowledge. Therefore,
although these activities may result in an asset with physical substance (e.g. a prototype),
the physical element of the asset is secondary to its intangible component, i.e. the knowledge
embodied in it.
I. RESEARCH
Research is original and planned investigation undertaken with the prospect of gaining new
scientific or technical knowledge and understanding.
J. DEVELOPMENT
Development is the application of research findings or other knowledge to a plan or design for the
production of new or substantially improved materials, devices, products, processes, systems or
services before the start of commercial production or use.
An intangible asset arising from development shall be recognised if, and only if, an entity can
demonstrate all of the following:
The cost of an internally generated intangible asset is the total expenditure incurred from the
date when the intangible asset first meets the recognition criteria.
This cost includes all directly attributable costs necessary to create, produce and prepare the
asset to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management. For example:
If the two phases cannot be distinguished, then the entire expenditure is classified as research.
A project can very often commence with a research phase and subsequently evolve into a
development phase. In this situation, it will be necessary to determine at what point in time
the project has entered into this development stage. Expenditure incurred up to this point must
be expensed in the Statement of Comprehensive Income and expenditure after this point can be
capitalised as an intangible asset (assuming the afore-mentioned conditions apply).
Using hindsight to capitalise the entire expenditure in not allowed. Research expenditure must
be expensed when incurred and IAS 38 does not allow the re-instatement of previously written
off costs. In addition, it is not permissible to accumulate costs in an account and then consider
the nature of the entire project only when preparing the year end financial statements.
• Cost Model, or
• Revaluation Model
L. COST MODEL
The intangible asset should be carried at: Cost
Less Accumulated Amortisation
The “fair value” should be determined by reference to an active market. If there is no active
market for the asset, it cannot be revalued. Thus, the revaluation model would be inappropriate
in this case.
An active market is one in which:
• The items traded are homogenous
• Willing buyers and sellers can be found at any time
• Prices are available to the public.
70 I1.2 FINANCIAL REPORTING CPA EXAMINATION
STUDY MANUAL
As a result of this definition of an active market, the revaluation model is not a realistically usable
model. Intangible assets such as brands, trademarks, film titles, copyright etc. are unique and
cannot be considered homogenous.
If a revaluation policy is used, the revaluation should be carried out regularly so that the fair value
of the asset does not differ materially from its carrying amount at the Statement of Financial
Position date.
This means that the frequency with which an intangible asset is revalued depends on the volatility
of the fair values of the asset. Accordingly, some intangible assets will be revalued on an annual
basis while others may show only insignificant movements in fair value, thereby necessitating
less frequent revaluations.
If an intangible asset shows a revaluation gain, that gain should be credited to reserves.
However, if the gain reverses a previous revaluation loss of the same asset, and that loss was
recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income, then the present gain shall be credited
to the Statement of Comprehensive Income, with any excess going to reserves.
If the intangible asset shows a revaluation loss, that loss shall be recognised in the Statement of
Comprehensive Income. However, if the loss reverses a previous revaluation gain of the same
asset, and that gain was credited to reserves, the loss should be debited to reserves to the extent
of any credit balance in the revaluation surplus in respect of that asset.
[The cumulative revaluation surplus included in equity may be transferred directly to retained
earnings on disposal or retirement of the asset. Alternatively, some of the surplus may be realised
as the asset is used by the entity.
The transfer from revaluation surplus to retained earnings is not made through the Statement of
Comprehensive Income but through the Statement of Changes in Equity.]
Example
T. Cabs Ltd. owns a freely transferable taxi operators licence, which it acquired on 1st January
2009, at an initial cost of RWF20,000. The useful life of the licence is 5 years (its valid life).
Straight line amortisation is used. Licences such as these are traded frequently between both
existing operators and new entrants to the industry. At the year end 31st December 2010, the
traded value of a licence was now 240,000 as a result of an increase in taxi fares announced by
the Taxi Regulator.
• Finite, or
• Indefinite
All relevant factors must be considered in assessing the lifespan of an intangible asset, for
example:
An intangible asset with a finite life should be amortised over its estimated useful life. Such
amortisation is usually on a straight-line basis and no residual value is provided for unless:
• There is a commitment by a third party to purchase the asset at the end of its useful life, or
• There is an active market for the asset and:
Amortisation of an intangible asset with a finite life commences when the asset is available for
use and will cease when the asset is derecognised or when the asset is classified as held for
sale, whichever is earlier.
The amortisation of an intangible asset is usually recognised in the profit or loss for
the period. The amortisation period and method should be reviewed on an annual basis, and
changed if necessary.
If an intangible asset is deemed to have an indefinite life, that asset should not be amortised.
However, it should be tested for impairment annually and whenever there is an indication that
the asset may be impaired.
The asset is said to have an indefinite life if there is no foreseeable limit to the periods over which
the asset is expected to generate net cash inflows.
If a change occurs, resulting in an intangible asset with a heretofore indefinite life becoming an
asset with a finite life, such an alteration is considered to be a change in estimate (IAS 8) and
thus does not require a prior year adjustment.
• On disposal, or
• When no future economic benefits are expected.
P. DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
The disclosure requirements for intangible assets are extensive.
The entity must disclose the following for each class of intangible assets, distinguishing between
internally generated intangible assets and other intangible assets:
• Whether the useful lives are indefinite or finite and, if finite, the useful lives or the amortisation
rates used.
• The amortisation methods used for intangible assets with finite useful lives.
• The gross carrying amount and any accumulated amortisation (aggregated with accumulated
impairment losses) at the beginning and end of the period
• The line item(s) of the Statement of Comprehensive Income in which any amortisation of
intangible assets is included
• A reconciliation of the carrying amount at the beginning and end of the period showing:
• For an asset assessed as having an indefinite useful life, the carrying amount of that asset
and reasons supporting the assessment of an indefinite useful life
• The amount of contractual commitments for the acquisition of intangible assets
• The aggregate amount of research and development expenditure recognised as an expense
during the period
• Details of revaluations
• The existence and carrying amounts of assets whose title is restricted and the carrying
amounts of assets pledged as security for liabilities
• A description of any fully amortised intangible asset that is still in use, and
• A brief description of significant intangible assets controlled by the entity but not recognised as
assets because they did not meet the recognition criteria in the standard or because they were
acquired or generated before the version of IAS 38 issued in 1998 was effective.
CPA EXAMINATION I1.2 FINANCIAL REPORTING 73
STUDY MANUAL
Q. ASSETS WITH BOTH TANGIBLE AND INTANGIBLE ELEMENTS
IAS 38 recognises that some intangible assets may be contained in or on a physical substance
such as a compact disc (in the case of computer software), legal documentation (in the case of
a licence or patent) or film.
It must then be determined whether an asset that incorporates both intangible and tangible
elements should be treated under IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment or under IAS 38
Intangible Assets. In order to resolve this issue, the entity must use judgement to assess which
element is more significant.
For example, computer software for a computer-controlled machine tool that cannot operate
without that specific software is an integral part of the related hardware and it is treated as
Property, Plant and Equipment. The same applies to the operating system of a computer.
But when the software is not an integral part of the related hardware, computer software is
treated as an intangible asset.
SIC 32 states that a website that has been developed for the purposes of promoting and
advertising an entity’s products and services does not meet the criteria for the capitalisation of
costs under IAS 38. Therefore, costs incurred in setting up such websites should be expensed.
S. QUESTIONS
Example 1
H. Ltd. develops and manufactures exhaust systems. The company has 3 projects in hand on
30th June 2010; A1, B2 & C3. The details for each are as follows:
A1 B2 C3
RWF’000 RWF’000 RWF’000
Deferred development expenditure at 1st July 1,080 1,500 -
2009
Development expenditure incurred in year ended
30th June 2010:
Wages and Salaries 180 - 120
Material 30 - 24
Overheads 9 - 18
Project A1
All expenditure on this project was capitalised until 30th June 2009 as the conditions necessary
for capitalisation, as laid down by IAS 38, were present. However, during the current year, the
future profitability of the project became doubtful due to previously unforeseen competitive
pressures.
Project C3
This project only commenced in the year under review and appears to satisfy the criteria for
deferral.
REQUIREMENT:
Show how the above 3 projects would affect the financial statements of H. Ltd. for the year ended
30th June 2010
SOLUTION
Project A1
The balance brought forward at the start of the year and all the expenditure incurred during the
year ended 30th
June 2010 must be written off, as the conditions for deferral no longer apply. Thus, write off
RWF1,299,000.
Project B2
Since commercial production has commenced and revenue is now flowing from the sale of the
units, it is now appropriate to amortise the deferred development expenditure too. This means
that costs and revenues from the project will be “matched”. IAS 38 states that development
expenditure should be amortised on a systematic basis to reflect the pattern in which the assets
future economic benefits are expected to be consumed by the entity (or on a straight line basis
if no consumption pattern is evident).
Project C3
The expenditure incurred during the year ended 30th June 2010 can be capitalised. Thus,
show RWF162,000 as an intangible asset in the financial statements.
STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30TH JUNE 2010
RWF
Amortisation of development expenditure 167,000
Development Expenditure written off 1,299,000
Example 2
In a major shift in the focus of operations, OFA.Ltd plans to sell its products through the internet.
During 2009,
the company purchased a domain name for RWF30,000 from an individual who had previously
registered it.
How should the cost of acquiring the domain name be accounted for in the financial statements
for the year ended 31st December 2009?
SOLUTION
The issue to be resolved here is whether the cost of acquiring the domain name should be
capitalised as an asset
or written off as an expense. One argument is that since the payment was made with the
expectation that the organisation would generate future economic benefits from conducting its
business through the new website, it qualifies as an asset and should therefore be capitalised.
However, similar arguments apply to other costs such as advertising and marketing expenditure,
which are not allowed to be capitalised.
The payment is certainly not an identifiable asset in its own right, since the payment made by
OFA Ltd. was solely to facilitate carrying out its own business, albeit through the internet. OFA
Ltd. could choose not to acquire its domain name, but this in itself would not prevent the company
from trading through the net, as it could always register another name.
The only advantage of trading through the internet using the same name is to enable OFA Ltd.
to exploit its existing presence in the marketplace. The real economic benefit to the organisation
comes not from the name registration but from the internally generated brand that OFA Ltd has
already developed. It is also doubtful that the name could be separately marketable, since it is
unlikely to have any value to a third party.
On this basis, the payment for the name is effectively a one-off cost that OFA Ltd. has incurred to
remove an obstacle to conducting business through the internet. An analogy would be a payment
to the Office of Registrar General for registering the OFA Ltd name.
It is, therefore, very much in the nature of a pre-operating cost that should be written off to the
Statement of Comprehensive Income in the year it is incurred.
INVENTORIES IAS 2
OBJECTIVE
IAS 2 sets out the accounting treatment for inventories. For many entities, closing inventory can
be a highly significant figure and is used in the calculation of profit and also shown as a current
asset in the Statement of Financial Position.
Thus, the main issue addressed in IAS 2 is the establishing of the amount of cost that should be
recognised in the accounts.
B. DEFINITIONS
Inventories are assets:
C. MEASUREMENT
Inventories should be measured at the lower of cost and net realisable value.
Cost should comprise:
Costs of purchase + Costs of conversion + Other costs incurred in bringing the inventories to
their present location and condition
Net Realisable Value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the
estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale.
The costs of purchase include the purchase price, import duties (and other taxes not recoverable
by the entity), transport and handling costs and any other directly attributable costs. However,
note that trade discounts, rebates and other similar items must be deducted.
The costs of conversion include costs that are directly related to the units of production e.g. direct
labour, direct expenses, work subcontracted to third parties. They also include a systematic
allocation of fixed and variable overheads. When allocating such overheads, the overheads must
be based on normal level of activity.
The other costs mentioned above are any other costs incurred in bringing the inventory to its
present condition and location.
The standard mentions other costs which must be excluded from the cost of inventories.
These are:
Instead, these costs are to be charged as expenses in the period they are incurred. In relation
to Net Realisable Value, the standard makes the following points:
• Inventories may have to be written down below cost to NRV if the item becomes damaged,
obsolete or if the selling price has declined
If the circumstances which caused inventories to be written down below cost no longer apply,
the amount of the write-down is reversed.
Example:
Value the following items of inventory (each relating to separate entities)
(a) A consignment of goods purchased three weeks before the year-end for RWF20,000 was
subsequently damaged in an accident. The original estimated selling price of these goods was
RWF27,000. However, in order to make the goods ready for sale, remedial work costing RWF4,500
needs to be carried out, after which the goods will be sold for RWF23,000.
(b) Materials were purchased for RWF18,000. Since these items were purchased, a new competitor
has entered the market, forcing down the cost of supplies. The cost price of the goods has fallen
to RWF15,000. The goods are expected to be sold for RWF25,000.
(c) For operational reasons, an entity could not carry out its annual stocktake until five days after the
year-end.
At this date, stock on the premises was RWF20 million at cost. Between the year-end and the
stocktake, the following transactions were identified:
Solution:
(c) RWF
Cost of goods per stocktake 20,000,000
Add: Cost of items sold between year end and stocktake
Normal sales 1,200,000
Less: Cost of items purchased between year end and stocktake (780,000)
Cost of goods 21,164,000
If the cost is less than the NRV, value at RWF21,164,000
D. VALUATION METHODS
IAS 2 states that the cost of inventories should be arrived at using:
The same cost formula should be used for all inventories having a similar nature and use.
If the inventories are not interchangeable, they should be valued using specific identification of
their individual costs.
E. DISCLOSURE
The following should be disclosed:
Example
CD Ltd. Manufactures bicycles and in its most recent financial year, the costs associated with
this were as follows:
RWF
Materials 15,000
Labour 10,000
Machinery depreciation 5,000
Factory rates 5,000
Sundry Factory Expenses 12,000
Selling expenses 4,000
Head Office expenses 18,000
Total 69,000
At the end of the year, there are 500 bicycles in stock. The value placed on these should be as
follows:
Materials 15,000
Labour 10,000
Machinery depreciation 5,000
There are 10,000 units in inventory at the year end. Normal production is 1,000,000 units per
year, but due to ongoing industrial unrest during the year, actual production was only 500,000
units.
Therefore, the goods in inventory at the year end should be valued at:
Thus, 10,000 units x RWF4.05 = RWF405,000 should be shown in the accounts as closing
inventory. RWF10,000
Note that both options have the same impact on the profit or loss for the period.
Repayment of a grant related to an asset should be recorded by increasing the carrying amount
of the asset or reducing the deferred income balance by the amount repayable. The total extra
depreciation that would have been recognised to date as an expense, if the grant had not been
received, should be recognised immediately as an expense.
Repayment of a grant related to income should be first set against any unamortised deferred
credit in relation to the grant. If the repayment exceeds the amount of that deferred credit, or
if no deferred credit existed in the first place, the excess should be recognised as an expense
immediately.
Example:
F.Ltd. qualified for a grant of RWF80 million to construct and manage a windmill in an
economically
80 I1.2 FINANCIAL REPORTING CPA EXAMINATION
STUDY MANUAL
disadvantaged area near Butare. It is estimated that the windmill would cost RWF150 million
to build. The grant stipulates that F.Ltd must employ labour from the locality in the construction
and going forward, must maintain a 1:1 ratio of local to outside labour for the next 7 years. The
windmill will be depreciated on a straight line basis over 10 years.
Therefore, the grant received by F.Ltd will also be recognised over a 10 year period. In each of
the 10 years, the grant will be recognised in proportion to the annual depreciation of the windmill.
This means that RWF8 million per annum will be recognised as income in each of the 10 years.
Additionally, the condition to maintain the local workforce at the levels stipulated needs to be
disclosed. This contingency would have to be disclosed for the next 7 years (during which period
the condition is in force). This will also meet the requirements of IAS 37.
F. DISCLOSURE
The following must be disclosed:
• The accounting policy adopted for government grants, including the methods of presentation
adopted in the financial statements.
• The nature and the extent of government grants recognised in the financial statements and
an indication of other forms of government assistance from which the entity has directly
benefited.
• Unfulfilled conditions and other contingencies attaching to government assistance that
has been recognised.
G. SUNDRY MATTERS
Examples of government assistance that cannot reasonably have a value placed upon them are:
Thus, these are excluded from the definition of government grants and should not be treated
as such. Furthermore, entities may receive government assistance which is not specifically
related to their operatingactivities. For example, transfers of resources to entities operating in an
underdeveloped area.
SIC 10 states that such forms of assistance do constitute grants and should be accounted for in
accordance with IAS 20. This is because the grants received are conditional upon the recipient
operating in a particular industry or area.
Finally, if a grant is received in relation to an asset that is not depreciated, then the grant should
be amortised over the period in which the cost of meeting the obligations or conditions attached
to the grant is incurred.
The objective of IAS 37 is to ensure that appropriate recognition criteria and measurement
bases are applied to provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets and that sufficient
information is disclosed in the notes to the financial statements to enable users to understand
their nature, timing and amount.
For example, an entity might engage in profit-smoothing. It might create a provision in years
where profits are high (thereby artificially reducing profits) and subsequently reverse those
provisions in years where profits are low (thereby artificially increasing profits).
Thus, IAS 37 states that provisions can only be made where there are valid grounds for their
creation.
C. DEFINITIONS
A provision is a liability of uncertain timing or amount.
A liability is a present obligation arising from past events, the settlement of which is expected to
result in an outflow from the entity of resources embodying economic benefits.
In order for a provision to be recognised in the financial statements, all the following conditions
must be met:
• There is a present obligation as a result of a past event. [This obligation can be legal or
constructive.]
• It is probable that a transfer of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation.
• A reliable estimate can be made of the obligation.
If all three conditions are met, then a provision can be created. Generally this is done by:
When the obligation is discharged in the future, the liability is removed from the Statement of
Financial
Position, or indeed, more information may become available requiring the provision to be
adjusted.
It is necessary to take a closer look at the conditions for creating a provision, and in particular
the terminology used.
Firstly, an obligation is a past event that creates a legal or constructive obligation that results in
an enterprise having no realistic alternative to settling that obligation.
The absence of a realistic alternative is critical in determining the validity of the provision. As
stated above, the obligation can be legal or constructive.
• A contract
• Legislation
• Other operation of law
In relation to the transfer of economic benefits, such a transfer is considered probable if it is more
likely than not to occur, i.e. there is a greater than 50% chance of such a transfer will arise.
IAS 37 states that the amount recognised as a provision should be the best estimate of the
expenditure required to settle the present obligation at the Statement of Financial Position date.
Such estimates are determined by the judgement of management, who will use their experience
of similar transactions and, if necessary, reports from independent experts.
In cases where there is a range of possible outcomes, management can use the “expected
value” statistical method.
Risks and uncertainties surrounding events and circumstances should be considered in arriving
at the best estimate of a provision.
If a group of items is being measured, it is the “expected value”.
If a single obligation is being measured, it is the “most likely outcome”.
Example:
A company sells goods with a warranty for parts and labour after sales, for any manufacturing defects.
Past experience indicates the following:
75% of goods had no defect
20% of the goods had a minor defect
5% of the goods had a major defect
Management expect past trends and costs to continue. They sold 100,000 units in the period.
Can a provision be created for the cost of repairs?
Is there a present obligation as a result of a past event? Yes, there is a legal contract as a result
of the warranty given to customers.
Is it probable that a transfer of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation? Yes,
repairing items have a cost that must be met.
Can a reliable estimate be made of the obligation? Yes, using expected value it can be calculated
as follows:
Thus the company should create a provision in the amount of RWF1,350,000 for the estimated
future cost of repairing items.
In calculating the amount of a provision, where the effect of the time value of money is material,
the provision should be the present value of the expenditure required to settle the obligation.
The discount rate in calculating the present value should be appropriate to the company, i.e.
reflect current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the
liability.
The discount rate to be used in calculating the present value should be the pre-tax discount rate
that reflects current market assessments of time value of money and the risks specific to the
liability.
Note that gains from the expected disposal of assets should not be taken into account in
measuring a provision.
The reimbursement should be treated as a separate asset in the Statement of Financial Position,
but may be netted against the related provision expense in the Statement of Comprehensive
Income.
Provisions should be reviewed at each Statement of Financial Position date and adjusted if
necessary. If it is no longer appropriate for the provision to continue, then it should be reversed.
Provisions should not be created for future operating losses. This is because they do not meet
the definition of a liability, as set out earlier. [However, expected future losses may suggest that
assets are impaired and so the entity should test the assets for impairment under IAS 36.]
D. RESTRUCTURING
If the entity is to embark on a restructuring programme (for example, closure of business locations,
sale of a business division, changes in management structure) expected future costs of that
restructuring can be provided for if the entity:
E. ONEROUS CONTRACT
An onerous contract is a contract in which the unavoidable costs of meeting the obligations
under the contract exceed the economic benefits expected to be received under it.
The unavoidable costs are the lower of the cost of fulfilling the contract and any penalties arising
from failure to fulfil it.
F. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
A contingent liability is:
• A possible obligation that arises from past events and whose existence will be confirmed only
by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more uncertain future events not wholly within
the control of the entity or
• A present obligation that arises from past events but is not recognised because:
• It is not probable that a transfer of economic benefits will be required to settle the
obligation; or
• The amount of the obligation cannot be measured reliably.
An entity should not recognise a contingent liability in the financial statements. However, it should
disclose the following:
However, the position of a contingent liability is often fluid. Thus the entity should continually
assess the situation to determine if the status of the contingency should be changed to a provision
or removed altogether from the notes to the financial statements.
G. CONTINGENT ASSETS
A contingent asset is a possible asset that arises from past events and whose existence will be
confirmed only by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more uncertain future events not
wholly within the control of the entity.
However, if the realisation of income is virtually certain, the asset is not a contingent asset any
longer and should be recognised.
Again, contingent assets should be continually reviewed and any change in status should
be recorded appropriately.
In relation to the disclosure of information surrounding provisions, contingent assets and
contingent liabilities, IAS 37 does provide a “let-out” clause.
Paragraph 92 states that where disclosure of such information might seriously prejudice the
position of the entity in a dispute with other parties on the subject matter of the provision,
contingent asset or contingent liability, then the entity need not disclose the information.
In that case, the entity should disclose the nature of the dispute as well as the fact and reason
why the information has not been disclosed.
But Paragraph 92 suggests that such cases will be “extremely rare”.
H. DISCLOSURES
For each class of provision, the following must be disclosed:
In relation to contingent liabilities, unless the possibility of settlement is remote, the entity must
disclose:
In relation to contingent assets, where an inflow is probable, the entity must disclose:
In extremely rare cases, disclosures required for provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent
Note in rare cases, it is not clear if there is a present obligation. In these cases, a past event is
deemed to give rise to a present obligation if, taking account of all available evidence, it is more
likely than not that a present obligation exists at the Statement of Financial Position date.
The purpose of IAS 10 is to outline the circumstances when an entity should adjust its financial
statements for events that occur after the Statement of Financial Position date and also the
disclosures necessary after these events have occurred.
The standard also indicates that if these events after the reporting date suggest that
the going concern assumption is no longer appropriate, then the entity should not prepare its
accounts on the going concern basis.
That is, if management determines that it will liquidate the entity or to cease trading or that it has
no other realistic alternative, then the financial statements should not be prepared on a going
concern basis. Instead, the Statement of Financial Position should be adjusted onto a break-up
basis.
B. DEFINITION
Events after the reporting date are those events, both favourable and unfavourable, that occur
between the reporting date and the date the financial statements are authorised for issue.
Events which occur between these dates may provide information which may help in the
preparation of the statements.
The standard distinguishes between two types of such events.
The settlement, after the Statement of Financial Position date, of a court case that confirms that
the entity had a present obligation at the Statement of Financial Position date: The entity will
accordingly adjust any previously recognised provision or create a new one.
The receipt of information after the Statement of Financial Position date indicating that an asset
was impaired at the Statement of Financial Position date, for example:
The determination after the Statement of Financial Position date of the cost of assets purchased,
or proceeds of assets sold, before the year-end.
The discovery of fraud or errors that show the financial statements are incorrect.
• A major business combination after the year end or the disposal of a major subsidiary
• Announcing a plan to discontinue an operation
• Major purchases of assets, disposals of assets, expropriation of major assets by
government or classification of assets as held for sale
• Destruction of a major production plant by fire
• Announcing or commencing a major restructuring
• Major ordinary share transactions after the year-end (other than bonus issues, share splits or
reverse share splits, which must be adjusted for)
• Abnormally large change in asset prices or foreign exchange rates after the year-end
• Changes in tax rates/laws
• Commencing major litigation arising solely out of events that occurred after the Statement of
Financial Position date
C. DIVIDENDS
If an entity declares dividends to holders of equity shares after the Statement of Financial Position
date, these dividends cannot be included as a liability at the Statement of Financial Position date.
This is because the dividends do not meet with the criteria of a present obligation in IAS 37. The
International Accounting Standards Board also discussed whether or not an entity’s past practice
of paying dividends could be considered a constructive obligation and concluded that such
practices do not give rise to a liability to pay dividends. However, the dividends are disclosed in
the notes in accordance with IAS 1.
For example, if further information is received concerning a contingent liability that existed at the
Statement of Financial Position date, the disclosures regarding that item as required under IAS
37 will have to be updated.
E. DISCLOSURE
The entity must disclose the date when the financial statements were authorised for issue and
who gave that authorisation. If the financial statements can be amended after issue, this fact
must be disclosed.
IAS 8 deals with selecting and changing accounting policies, accounting estimates and
errors. Its main objectives are to:
B. DEFINITIONS
Accounting policies are the specific principles, bases, conventions, rules and practices adopted
by an entity in preparing and presenting financial statements.
• Was available when financial statements for those periods were authorised for issue, and
• Could reasonably be expected to have been obtained and taken into account in the
preparation and presentation of those financial statements
Fraud
Retrospective application is applying a new accounting policy to transactions, other events and
conditions as if the policy had always been applied
Prospective application of a change in accounting policy and of recognising the effect of a change
in accounting estimate, respectively, is:
• Applying the new accounting policy to transactions, other events and conditions occurring
after the date as at which the policy is changed, and
• Recognising the effect of the change in the accounting estimate in the current and future
periods affected by the change.
C. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The existence and proper application of accounting policies are central to the proper understanding
of the information contained in the financial statements, as prepared by management. A clear
outline of all significant accounting policies used in the preparation of financial statements should
be provided in all cases. This is especially important in situations where alternative treatments,
permissible under certain IFRS, are possible. Failure to outline the accounting policy pursued by
the entity in such a situation would compromise the ability of users of the financial statements to
make relevant comparisons with other entities.
Accounting policies are determined by applying relevant IFRS or IFRIC and considering
any relevant implementation guidance issued by the IASB.
• Represent faithfully the financial position, financial performance and cash flows
• Reflect the economic substance of transactions, other events and conditions neutral
• Be prudent
• Be complete in all material respects
90 I1.2 FINANCIAL REPORTING CPA EXAMINATION
STUDY MANUAL
In this regard, when exercising such judgement, management should refer to (in this order):-
• The requirements and guidance of the IFRS’s and IFRIC’s dealing with similar and related
issues
• The definitions, recognition criteria and measurement concepts for assets, liabilities and
expenses in the framework
Furthermore, management can also consider (to the extent that they do not conflict with IASB
standards and the Framework):
Recent pronouncements of other standard setting bodies that use a similar conceptual framework
to develop standards,
The IAS restricts the instance in which a change in accounting policy is permissible. An entity
should change an accounting policy only if the change
The standard highlights two types of event that do not result in the change of an accounting
policy:
• The application of an accounting policy for transactions, other events or conditions that
differs in substance from those previously occurring
• The application of a new accounting policy for transactions, other events or conditions that did
not occur previously or were immaterial.
In the case of non-current tangible fixed assets, a move to revaluation accounting will not result
in a change of accounting policy under IAS 8 but a revaluation as per IAS 16.
E. DISCLOSURES
The following disclosures are required for a change in an accounting policy:-
The Standard defines the term “impracticable” to mean the entity cannot apply it after making
every effort to do so. For a particular period, it is impracticable to apply a change in accounting
policy if:
• The effects of the retrospective application are not determinable
• The retrospective application requires assumptions about what management’s intentions
would have been at the time; or
• The retrospective application requires significant estimates of amounts and it is impossible to
distinguish objectively, from other information, information about those estimates that:
Therefore, when it is impracticable to apply a change in policy retrospectively, the entity applies
the change to the earliest period to which it is possible to apply the change.
The nature and the amount of the change in an accounting estimate should be disclosed, unless
it would involve undue cost or effort. If this is the case, then this fact should be disclosed.
Note also that it can be difficult to distinguish between a change in an accounting policy and a
change in an accounting estimate. In a case where such a distinction is problematical, then the
change is treated as a change in accounting estimate, with appropriate disclosure.
Remember, estimates are approximations that may need revision as more information becomes
known. For example, the gain or loss on the outcome of a contingency that could not previously
have been estimated reliably does not constitute an error.
A material prior period error is corrected retrospectively in the first set of financial statements
authorised for issue after its discovery. The comparative amounts for the prior period(s) presented
in which the error occurred are restated. This simply means that material errors relating to prior
periods shall be corrected by restating comparative figures in the financial statements for the
year in which the error is discovered, unless it is “impracticable” to do so (the strict definition of
“impracticable”, mentioned earlier, applies).
IAS 1 (Revised) also requires that where a prior period error is corrected retrospectively, a
statement of financial position must be provided at the beginning of the earliest comparative
period.
Only where it is impracticable to determine the cumulative effect of an error on prior periods can
an entity correct the error prospectively.
The following disclosures are required for errors uncovered:-
• In retrospective restatement is impracticable for a particular prior period, the circumstances that
led to the existence of that condition and a description of how and from when the error has been
corrected. Subsequent periods need not repeat these disclosures.
I. QUESTIONS
RT. Ltd. changed its accounting policy in the year ended 31st December 2010 with respect to the
valuation of its inventories. Up to 2010, inventories were valued using a weighted average (AVCO)
cost method. But in 2010, the method was changed to first-in first-out (FIFO). The change
occurred as it was considered to more accurately reflect the usage and flow of inventories in
the economic cycle. The impact on inventory valuation was determined to be:
Assume the retained earnings of RT. ltd. on the 1st January 2009 were RWF900,000.
The Statement of Comprehensive Incomes prior to
adjustment are:
2010 2009
RWF RWF
Revenue 750,000 600,000
Cost of sales 300,000 240,000
Gross Profit 450,000 360,000
Administration Costs 180,000 150,000
Selling and distribution costs 75,000 45,000
Net profit 195,000 165,000
Show how the change in accounting policy impacts upon the Statement of Comprehensive
Income and the
Statement of Changes in Equity in accordance with the requirements of IAS 8.
SOLUTION
After adjusting, the Statement of Comprehensive Incomes would be as follows:
In each year, the cost of sales will be reduced by RWF15,000 (as the increase in closing inventory
exceeds the increase in opening inventory). As the cost of sales falls, the net profit rises.
The Statement of Changes in equity will reflect the impact on the retained earnings of RT. Ltd. as
follows: RWF
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of IAS 21The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates is to outline the
following issues:
IAS 21 states that the following factors should be considered when determining the functional
currency of an entity:
• The currency that mainly influences sales prices for goods and services (i.e. the currency in
which prices are denominated and settled)
• The currency of the country whose competitive forces and regulations mainly determine the
sales price of goods and services
The first three points are seen as the primary factors in determining an entities functional currency.
Furthermore, if an entity is a foreign operation (i.e. a subsidiary, associate, joint venture or branch
whose activities are based in a country or currency other than those of the reporting entity), the
following factors must also be considered:
• Whether the activities of the foreign operation are carried out as an extension of the parent,
rather than with a significant measure of autonomy/independence.
• Whether transactions with the parent are a high or low proportion of the foreign operations
activities
• Whether cash flows from the foreign operation directly affect the cash flows of the parent and
are readily available for remittance to it
• Whether cash flows from the activities of the foreign operation are sufficient to service existing
debt obligations without funds being made available by the parent
Where the indicators are mixed, management must exercise its judgement as to the functional
currency to adopt that best reflects the underlying transactions.
Putting the above into context, if an entity operates abroad as an independent operation
(generating income and expenses and raising finance, all in its own local currency), then its
functional currency would be its local currency. On the other hand, if the entity was merely an
overseas extension of the parent and only sells goods imported from the parent and remits all
profits back to the parent, then the functional currency should be the same as the parent. In this
case, the foreign entity would record its transactions in the currency of the parent and not its
local currency.
Once the functional currency has been determined, it is not subsequently changed unless there
is a change in the underlying circumstances that were relevant when determining the original
functional currency.
The presentation currency is the currency in which the financial statements are presented. IAS
21 states that, whereas an entity is constrained by the above factors in determining its functional
currency, it has a completely free choice as to the currency in which it presents its financial
statements.
If the presentation currency is different from the functional currency, then the financial statements
must be translated into the presentation currency. Therefore, if a parent entity has
subsidiaries whose functional currencies are different from that of the parent, then these must
be translated into the presentation currency so that the consolidation process can take place.
When translating the foreign currency transaction, the exchange rate used should be either:
• The spot exchange rate on the date the transaction occurred (the spot rate is the exchange
rate for immediate delivery); or
• For practical reasons, an average rate over a period of time, providing the exchange rate
has not fluctuated significantly
When cash settlement occurs, the settled amount should be translated using the spot rate
on the settlement date. If the exchange rate has altered between the transaction date and the
settlement date, there will be an exchange difference.
These exchange differences must be recognised as part of the profit or loss for the period in
which they arise.
Example
MSH Ltd has a year end of 31st December. On the 16th November, MSH purchased goods from
an American supplier for $125,000. On the 5th December, MSH paid the American supplier in
full.
The treatment of any foreign items remaining in the statement of financial position will depend on
whether they are classified as monetary of non-monetary items.
Monetary Items are defined as money /cash and assets and liabilities to be received or paid in
fixed or determinable amounts. Examples include cash, receivables, payables, loans, deferred
tax, pensions and provisions.
CPA EXAMINATION I1.2 FINANCIAL REPORTING 97
STUDY MANUAL
The main characteristic of non-monetary items is the absence of a right to receive a fixed or
determinable amount of money. They represent other items in the statement of financial position
that are not monetary items and include things like property plant and equipment, inventory,
investments, prepayments, goodwill, intangibles and inventory.
The rule for the treatment of these foreign items at the reporting date is as follows:
Monetary items: Re-translate using the closing rate of exchange (i.e. the spot exchange rate at
the reporting date)
Exchange differences arising on the re-translation of monetary items at the reporting date must
be recognised as part of the profit or loss for the period in which they arise.
Similarly, exchange differences arising on the subsequent settlement of these monetary items
after the reporting date should be recognised as part of the profit or loss for the period in which
they arise.
Example:
Pot Ltd. purchases specialised machinery for use in its production process from a foreign supplier
on 18th
September. The machine cost US$300,000 and was paid for in full one month later. The year
end is 31st
December.
US$300,000 / 4 = RWF75,000
In addition, at the year ended 31st December 2010, any outstanding monetary items must be
re-translated at the closing rate. In this example, there are two such monetary items remaining:
US$400,000 / 1.4 = RWF285,714 (Re-state the receivable to this amount) US$500,000 / 1.4 =
RWF357,143 (Re-state the loan to this amount)
Summary of FX Gains / Losses for the year ended 31st December 2010:
RWF
9th April Gain 33,333
23rd September Loss (41,667)
31st December Gain 35,714
31st December Gain 27,472
Note that when the Receivable is received in 2011, a further exchange gain or loss will need to
be calculated upon settlement and included as part of the profit or loss for the year ended 31st
December 2011.
There are a number of different methods that can be used to deal with the translation of a foreign
subsidiary. The method below outlines one such approach.
Note that the average rate for the year is used for expediency. Ideally, each item of income and
expenditure should be translated at the rate in existence for each transaction. But if there has
been no significant variance over the period, the average rate can be used.
Exchange differences arise because items are translated at different points in time at different
rates of exchange, for example, the profit or loss for the year forms part of the entity’s overall
retained earnings in the Statement of Financial Position. But, the profit or loss for the year is
arrived at by using the average rate, whereas the reserves figure as a whole in the Statement of
Financial Position does not use the average rate at all.
The exchange difference arising on translation of foreign currency accounts arises as follows:
Opening net assets + Profit for the year = Closing net assets
X/(X)
X/(X)
Total exchange gain / loss (multiplied by Group Share) X/(X)
Goodwill on consolidation
Goodwill is calculated in the normal way, e.g. if using the proportion of net assets method:
The exchange difference arising will form part of the total exchange difference disclosed
as other comprehensive income and accumulated in other components of equity.
Non-Controlling Interest
In either case, the NCI is translated at the closing rate at the reporting date.
On 1st June 2010, Home Limited acquired 80% of Faraway Inc., whose functional currency is the
US $. The financial statements at 31st May 2011 are as follows:
Neither entity recognised any components of other comprehensive income in their individual
accounts in the period.
• At the date of acquisition, the fair value of the net assets of Faraway were US$6,000. The
increase in the fair value is attributable to land that remains carried by Faraway at its historical
cost.
• Goodwill is translated at the closing rate.
• During the year, Home sold goods on cash terms for RWF1,000 to Faraway.
• On the 1st May 2011, Home lent Faraway RWF400. The liability is measured by Faraway at
the historic rate.
• The non-controlling interest is valued using the proportion of net assets method.
• Exchange rates to the RWF:
US$
1st June 2010 1.50
Average rate 1.75
1st May 2011 1.90
31st May 2011 2.00
SOLUTION:
Step 1: Establish Group Structure
Faraway
Group
80% NCI
20%
Subsidiary
1 year
Step 2: Adjustments
2.1 Inter Company Loan
Faraway has recorded the loan at its historic amount. The monetary liability must be translated
at the closing rate, with any gain/loss arising being included in the I/S for the year.
Initially, the loan would have been recorded at RWF400 x 1.9 = US$760
At year end, the loan is retranslated at RWF400 x 2 = US$800
At that date:
US$
Share capital 1,500
US$
Cost of investment RWF5,000 x 1.5 7,500
Less:
Net assets (given in question)
6,000
Group share 80% 4,800
Home Group
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the year ending 31st May 2011
RWF
Revenue 44,000
Operating costs -29,023
Profit before tax 14,977
Tax -12,257
Profit after tax 2,720
Home Group
9,254
9,980
Note 1: NCI in SOFP
On translation of Faraway’s SOFP in Step 5 earlier, the net assets (capital and reserves) were
translated as
RWF3,630 in total.
Home:
RWFm RWFm
Per SOFP 4,000.0
Loss on retranslation of goodwill -450.0
Faraway:
Group share of post-acq reserves
80% x -370 = -296 (the post-acq reserves were calculated as a balancing figure
3,550.0
in the translation of the SOFP of Faraway in Step 5)
-296.0
3,254.0
Note 3: Exchange Difference
In the Consolidated Accounts, the exchange difference will comprise:
Method 1:
RWFm
Opening reserves 800.0
Profit for year 720.0
1,520.0
Closing reserves 430.0
Exchange difference 1,090.0
Method 2:
Opening net assets (1,500 + 3,300 + 1,200) = US$6,000
RWFm
Opening net assets at last year’s closing rate (1.5) 4,000
Opening net assets at this year’s closing rate (2) 3,000
Loss 1,000
Profit for year = US$1,260
RWFm
Profit for year at average rate (1.75) 720
Profit for year at closing rate (2) 630
Loss 90
Total Net Loss 1,000 + 90 + 1,090
Group share RWF1,090 x 80% = RWF872
NCI share RWF1,090 x 20% = RWF218
Memo Random
Property, plant and equipment RWFm US$m
297 146
Investment in Random 48 -
Loan to Random 5 -
Current assets 355 102
705 248
Capital and reserves
Ordinary shares of RWF1/1US$ 60 32
Share premium account 50 20
Retained earnings 360 95
470 147
Non-current liabilities 30 41
Current liabilities 205 60
705 248
RWFm US$m
Revenue 200 142
Cost of sales (120) (96)
Gross profit 80 46
Distribution and administrative expenses (30) (20)
Operating profit 50 26
Interest receivable 4 -
Interest payable - (2)
Profit before taxation 54 24
Income tax expense (20) (9)
Profit for the year 34 15
The following information is relevant to the preparation of the consolidated financial statements
of Memo:
(a) During the financial year Random has purchased raw materials from Memo and
denominated the purchase in US$ in its financial records. The details of the transaction are set
out below:
Date of Transaction Purchase Price Profit Percentage
on
Selling Price
RWFm
Raw materials 1st February 20X4 6 20%
(b) Memo had made an interest free loan to Random of RWF5 million on 1st May 20X3. The loan
was repaid on 30th May 20X4. Random had included the loan in non-current liabilities and had
recorded it at the exchange rate at 1st May 20X3.
(c) The fair value of the net assets of Random at the date of acquisition is to be assumed to be the same
as the carrying value. Goodwill is to be calculated using the traditional method of only calculating
goodwill acquired by the parent i.e. the non-controlling interest is calculated as a proportionate
share of the subsidiary’s net assets with no goodwill allocated.
US$ to RWF
30th April/1st May 20X3 2.5
1st November 20X3 2.6
1st February 20X4 2
30th April 20X4 2.1
Average rate for year to 30th April 20X4 2
(f) Memo has paid a dividend of RWF8 million during the financial year.
REQUIREMENT:
Prepare a consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the year ended 30th
April 20X4 and a consolidated statement of financial position at that date in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards.
SOLUTION:
Subsidiary
1 year
Step 2: Adjustments
2.1 Inter Company Purchases
Random purchased goods from Memo and paid for them prior to the year end. The FX rate
between the date of purchase and date of settlement changed, giving rise to a gain or loss. This
exchange gain or loss is still held in the current liabilities of Random, according to the question.
Thus, calculate the FX gain/loss arising and treat it properly in the
accounts. Initially, the transaction was recorded at RWF6m x 2 = 12
million US$.
RWFm RWFm
Debit I/S (reserves) Memo 0.6
Credit Inventory 0.6
Eliminate inter company sales and cost of sales of RWF6m in the consolidated Statement
of Comprehensive Income.
Step 3: Translate the Statement of Comprehensive Income of Random, at the average rate for
the year
US$ m Rate RWFm
142.0 2 71.0
Revenue
Cost of sales -96.0 2 -48.0
Gross profit 46.0 23.0
Distribution and -20.0 2 -10.0
Administration
Interest payable -2.0 2 -1.0
US$ m
Cost of investment 120
Less:
Share capital 32
Share premium 20
Reserves at acquisition 80
132
Group share 75%
-99
Goodwill in foreign currency 21
RWFm
Translate at acquisition 21/2.5 8.4
Translate at reporting date 21/2/1 10.0
Gain (to reserves) 1.6
RWFm
Revenue 265.0
Cost of sales -162.6
Gross profit 102.4
Administration & Distribution expenses -40.0
Interest receivable 4.0
Interest payable -1.0
FX gain 0.4
Profit before tax 65.8
Tax -24.5
Profit for the year 41.3
RWFm RWFm
Intangibles:
Goodwill 10.0
Tangibles (297 + 69.5) 366.5
Current Assets (355 + 48.6 – 0.6) 403.0
779.5
Memo:
RWFm RWFm
Per SOFP 360.0
Inventory profit 0.6
Gain on retranslation of goodwill 1.6
Random:
Group share of post-acq reserves 361.0
75% x 17.6 (17.6 was calculated in the retranslated SOFP of Random in Step 5) 13.2
374.2
Method 1:
RWFm
Opening reserves 32.0
Profit for year 7.9
39.9
Closing reserves 49.6
Exchange difference 9.7
Method 2:
RWFm
Profit for year at average rate (2.0) 7.9
Profit for year at closing rate (2.1) 7.5
Loss 0.4
OBJECTIVE
The objective of IAS 7 is to require the provision of information about the historical changes in
cash and cash equivalents of an entity by means of a cash flow statement, which classifies cash
flow into:
• Operating Activities
• Investing Activities
• Financing Activities
The standard requires the cash flow statement to be presented as an integral part of the financial
statements.
All entities need cash to conduct their operations, discharge their obligations and provide returns
to their investors.
The cash flow statement, taken together with the other financial statements, helps users to
evaluate the position and performance of the entity.
Cash flow statements assist in assessing the ability of an entity to generate cash and cash
equivalents. Also, cash flows generated in the past are often used as an indicator of future cash
flows.
B. DEFINITIONS
Cash comprises cash on hand and demand deposits. Bank overdrafts, because they can be
repayable on demand, are often included as a component of cash.
Cash equivalents are short term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known
amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value. They
are held to meet short-term cash commitments rather than for investments and usually have a
maturity of three months or less.
Cash flows do not include movements in cash and cash equivalents. It is considered that such
items are part of the cash management of an entity rather than part of its operating, investing
and financing activities.
C. OPERATING ACTIVITIES
These are the main revenue producing activities of the entity. The cash flow from operating
activities is a key indicator of the extent to which the operations of the entity has generated cash
to:
• Repay loans
• Maintain the operating capability
• Pay dividends
• Make new investments
D. INVESTING ACTIVITIES
These are the acquisition and disposals of long-term assets and other investments. It is important
to disclose the cash flows from investing activities separately because these represent the extent
to which expenditures have been made for resources intended to generate future income and
cash flows.
E. FINANCING ACTIVITIES
These are activities that result in changes in the size and composition of the contributed equity
and borrowings of the entity. The disclosure of cash flows arising from financing activities is
useful in predicting claims on future cash flows by providers of capital.
• The Direct Method, whereby major classes of gross cash receipts and gross cash payments
and cash receipts from customers, and cash payments to suppliers are disclosed
Or
• The Indirect Method, whereby profit or loss is adjusted for the effects of transactions of a non-
cash nature and the accrual or deferral of past or future operating cash receipts or payments
e.g. profit adjusted for depreciation and any increase in trade payables and accruals.
Taxes on Income
Cash flows from taxes on income should be separately disclosed and classified under operating
activities unless
they can be specifically identified with financing and investing activities.
Indirect Method – Cash Flow Statement
The remainder of the cash flow statement is the same as the indirect method.
G. WORKED EXAMPLES
A cash flow statement essentially links together the opening Statement of Financial Position, the
Statement of
Comprehensive Income and the closing Statement of Financial Position.
Example 1
Z Limited’s opening SOFP had cash of RWF60,000 and ordinary shares of RWF60,000. Its
trading activities for the year ended 31st December 20X1are as follows:
RWF RWF
Cash sales 100,000
Cash purchases 70,000
Closing inventory Nil
Cost of sales 70,000
Gross profit 30,000
Cash expenses (12,000)
Profit 18,000
SOFP
Year End Start
RWF’ RWF’
000 000
Non-Current assets Nil Nil
Cash (60 + 18) 78 60
78 60
Shareholders’ Equity
Ordinary shares 60 60
Retained earnings 18 -
78 60
Cash Flow Statement – Indirect Method
RWF’000
Profit 18,000
Adjusted for depreciation and changes in inventory etc Nil
Net cash from operating activities 18,000
RWF’000
Cash received from customers 100,000
Cash paid to suppliers (70,000)
Cash paid to employers and other cash payments (12,000)
Net cash from operating activities 18,000
Example 2
In the year ended 31st December 20X2 Z Limited borrowed RWF40,000 on a long-term basis.
It bought equipment for RWF20,000. It’s trading activities for the year ended 31st December
19X2 are as follows:
Example 3
In the year ended 31st December 20X3 Z Limited had the
following trading activities:
RWF’000 RWF’000
Sales 175
Opening inventory Nil
Purchases 16
Closing inventory (25)
Cost of sales (91)
Gross profit 84
Cash expenses (22)
Depreciation (5)
Operating profit 57
Interest paid (4)
Profit before taxation 53
Income tax paid (14)
Profit after taxation 39
SOFP
Year End Start
RWF’000 RWF’000
Non-Current assets 10 15
Inventory 25 -
Receivables 18 -
Bank* 139 122
182 122
Liabilities
Trade payables 16 -
Tax payable - -
16 -
Loan 40 40
Total liabilities 56 40
Interest expense 4
62
Increase in inventory (25)
Increase in trade receivables (18)
Increase in trade payables 16
Cash generated from operations 35
Interest paid (4)
Income tax paid (14)
Net cash from Operating Activities 17
SOFP
Year End Start
RWF’000 RWF’000
Non-Current assets 5 10
Inventory 34 25
Trade receivable 23 18
Bank 186 153
243 196
Total assets 258 206
Liabilities
Trade payables 25 16
Interest accrued 2 -
Income tax payable 22 14
49 30
Loan 30 40
Total liabilities 79 70
Shareholders Equity
Ordinary shares 60 60
Retained earnings 109 76
169 136
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity 248 206
Example
Year 1 Year 2
RWF’000 RWF’000
Plant - cost 1,000 800
- depreciation 400 480
During the year plant costing RWF200,000, which had been depreciated by RWF120,000,
was sold for
RWF90,000.
The depreciation charge and profit/loss on disposal can be ascertained using “T” accounts.
Plant - Depreciation
RWF’000 RWF’000
Balances b/f 400
Disposal 120 P & L (bal. 200
figure)
Balance c/f 480
600 600
RWF’000
Profit before taxation X
Adjustments for:
Depreciation 200
Profit on disposal of plant (10)
I. TAXATION
The taxation paid figure in the cash flow statement is calculated as follows:
Taxation Account
RWF’000 RWF’000
Balance b/d 135 Balance b/d 120
Bank tax paid 120 Statement of Comprehensive 135
Income
255 255
J. DIVIDENDS
The dividends paid figure in the cash flow statement is calculated in a similar fashion to the
taxation paid:
Dividend Account
RWF’000 RWF’000
Balance c/d 100 Balance b/d 80
Bank Dividend 80 Statement of Comprehensive 100
paid Income
180 180
RWF’000
Sales 2,553
Cost of sales 1,814
Gross profit 739
Distribution costs 125
Administrative
expenses 264
Operating profit 350
Interest received 25
Interest paid 75
Profit before taxation 300
Taxation 140
Profit after taxation 160
Dividends 100
Retained profit for the year 60
Non-Current Assets
SOFPs as at 31st December
Year 2 Year 1
RWF’000 RWF’000
Tangible 380 305
Intangible 250 200
Investments 25
630 530
Current
assets
Inventory 150 102
Trade receivables 390 315
Investments 50 -
Cash in hand 2 1
592 418
Total assets 1,222 948
Liabilities
Trade payables 127 119
Bank overdraft 85 89
Income tax payable 190 160
Dividend payable 100 80
502 448
Long term loan 100 -
Total liabilities 602 448
Shareholders Equity
Share capital 200 150
Share premium 160 150
Retained earnings 260 200
31/12/Yr 2 31/12/Yr 1
RWF’ RWF’
000 000
Cost 720 595
Depreciation 340 290
Net book value 380 305
• 50,000 ordinary RWF1 shares were issued at a premium of RWF0.20 per share during Year 2
• The current asset investments are readily disposable.
Required:
Prepare a cash flow statement for the year ended 31st December Year 2 using the indirect
method to comply with the provisions of IAS 7 Cash Flow Statements.
Solution
E Ltd Cash Flow Statement for the year ended 31st December Year 2
RWF’000 RWF’000
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year (33)
Working 1
Tangibles
RWF’000 RWF’000
Opening 595 Closing 720
Additions 210 Disposal 85
805 805
Accumulated Depreciation
RWF’000 RWF’000
Closing 340 Opening 290
Disposal 40 Depreciation 90
380 380
RWF’000 RWF’000
Cost 85 Accumulated 40
depreciation
Bank 32
Loss 13
85 85
Working 2
Income Tax
RWF’000 RWF’000
Closing 190 Opening 160
Bank 110 Statement of Comprehensive 140
Income
300 300
Working 3
Dividends
RWF’000 RWF’000
Closing 100 Opening 80
Bank Statement of Comprehensive 100
80 Income
180 180
If the figure for these dividends is not given in the question, it can be calculated by
reconstructing the minority interest “T” account, for example:
Share of profit of NCI (per i/s) X Balance b/d (per closing b/s) X
Any non-cash element of the consideration, e.g. shares, loan stock, etc is excluded from the cash
flow statement.
The total net cash cost of acquiring the subsidiary is included in the heading “Cash Flows from
Investing Activities”.
On disposal of a subsidiary the cash inflow will be:
Again, only the cash element of any consideration received is included in the cash flow statement.
[Note, however that receivables, payables and inventories of the subsidiary that exist at the
date of acquisition must be excluded when calculating the increase or decrease of receivables,
payables and inventories in the cash flow statement. Furthermore, other relevant balances
at acquisition must be taken into account in preparing the cash flow statement for the year of
acquisition]
SH.Limited is a long established company operating in the hotel and leisure industry. In recent
years, it has diversified into other areas, achieving its corporate expansion by the acquisition of
other companies.
SH Limited Draft Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the year ended 31st
December 20X7
RWF’000 RWF’000
4,455
Operating profit
Share of associate profits 1,485
Investment income 600
Interest payable (450)
Profit before tax 6,090
Tax (2,055)
Profit for period 4,035
Attributable to:
Equity holders of the parent 3,735
4,035
20X7 20X6
RWF’000 RWF’000
Buildings at book value 6,225 6,600
Machinery: Cost 9,000 4,200
Accumulated
(3,600) (3,300)
Depreciation
NBV 5,400 900
11,625 7,500
Machinery that had originally cost RWF1.5m was sold for RWF1.5m, resulting in a profit of
RWF300,000. New machinery was acquired in 20X7, including additions of RWF2.55m acquired
under finance leases.
RWF’000
Group income tax 1,173
Deferred
tax 312
Share of associate company tax 435
Tax attributable to investment income 135
2,055
3. Loans were issued at a discount in 20X7 and the carrying amount of the loans at 31st
December 20X7 included RWF120,000 representing the finance cost attributable to the discount
and allocated in respect of the current period.
567
Required
Prepare a draft consolidated cash flow statement for SH. Group for the year ended 31st
December 20X7, in accordance with the indirect method laid out in IAS 7.
Solution
SH Limited Draft Consolidated Cash Flow Statement for the year ended 31st December 20X7
RWF’000 RWF’000
31st December
20X7 20X6
Cash 5,460 13,545
Workings
(W1) Depreciation
(a) Buildings
RWF’000 RWF’000
NBV 20X6 6,600
NBV 20X7 6,225
Depreciation 375
(Note: there was no disposal of buildings during the year)
(b) Machinery
Provision for Depreciation on Machinery
Buildings 375
Machinery 600
975
Interest Account
Discount 120 Balance b/d 90
Interest paid (bal. fig.) 300 Charge for year (per i/s) 450
Balance c/d 120
540 540
Balance b/d 120
Tax paid (bal. fig.) 750 Balance b/d (651 + 39) 690
Statement of 1,485
Comprehensive Income
(1,173 + 312)
Machinery Account
Investment in Associate
RWF’000
RWF’000
11,235
Balance b/d -
The cash flow statement suffers from a number of drawbacks which may hinder its usefulness.
Generally, revenue is recognized when the entity has transferred control of goods and services
to the buyer. Control of an asset is described in the standard as ‘the ability to direct the use of,
and obtain substantially all of the remaining benefits from, the asset.’ (IFRS 15)
Introduction
Accruals accounting is based on the matching of costs with the revenue they generate. It is
crucially important under this convention that we establish the point at which revenue is
recognized, so that the correct treatment can be applied to the related costs. For example, the
costs of producing an item of finished goods should be carried as an asset in the statement of
financial position until such time as it is sold; they should then be written off as a charge to the
trading account. Which of these two treatments should be applied cannot be decided until it is
clear at what moment the sale of the item takes place? The decision has a direct impact on
profit since it would not be prudent to recognise the profit on sale until a sale has taken place, in
However, there are situations where revenue is recognized at other times than at the point of
sale, for example, the sale of a cell phone contract. This is a long-term service contract which
may involve multiple services and goods delivered at different points over the contract. In this
scenario, revenue is recognized upon the fulfilment of various performance obligations of each
distinct good and service. IFRS 15 applies to long-term service contracts as well as simpler
sales transactions involving single products and services. However, revenue recognition of long-
term service contracts is beyond the scope of this syllabus.
IFRS 15
IFRS 15 governs the recognition of revenue arising from contracts with customers. Revenue is
income arising in the ordinary course of an entity’s activities, such as sales and fees.
The key principle of IFRS 15 is that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of promised
goods or services to customers at an amount that the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange
for those goods or services. This is achieved by applying a five-step model:
Definitions
The following definitions are given in the standard.
b is income arising in the course of an entity’s ordinary activities.
Income is increases in economic benefits during the accounting period in the form of inflows or
enhancements of assets or decreases of liabilities that result in an increase in equity, other than
those relating to contributions from equity participants.
A contract is an agreement between two or more parties that creates enforceable rights and
obligations.
A customer is a party that has contracted with an entity to obtain goods or services that are an
output of the entity’s ordinary activities in exchange for consideration.
A performance obligation is a promise in a contract with a customer to transfer to the customer
either: a good or service (or a bundle of goods or services) that is distinct; or a series of distinct
goods or services that are substantially the same and that have the same pattern of transfer
to the customer. Transaction price is the amount of consideration to which an entity expects to
be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods or services to a customer, excluding
Measurement of revenue
This is the transaction price, as defined above in the standard, allocated to each performance
obligation. This will take account of any trade discounts and volume rebates. At Foundation
level, this is simply the amount at which the goods/services are sold to the customer, with one
exception; where a sale involves a cash (or settlement) discount.
EXAMPLE
In this example, the five-step model is applied to a simple sales transaction involving the sale of
a single product.
TDF is a company that manufactures office furniture. A customer placed an order on 22 December
20X4 for an office desk at a price of RWF300,000 plus sales tax at 20% of RWF60,000. The desk
was delivered to the customer on 25 January 20X5, who accepted the goods as satisfactory by
signing a delivery note. TDF then invoiced the customer for the goods on 1 February 20X5. The
customer paid RWF360,000 to TDF on 1 March 20X5.
Required
How should TDF account for revenue?
ANSWER
Applying the five-step model:
EXAMPLE
Now work through this example to give you practice in preparing financial statements in
accordance with IAS 1. Note that very little detail appears in the statement of profit or loss – all
items of income and expenditure are accumulated under the standard headings. Write out the
standard proformas and then go through the workings, inserting figures as you go.
USB Ltd, a limited liability company, has the following trial balance at 31 December 20X9.
RWF’000 RWF’000
Cash at bank 100
Inventory at 1 January 20X9 2,400
Administrative expenses 2,206
Distribution costs 650
Non-current assets at cost:
Buildings 10,000
Plant and equipment 1,400
vehicles 320
Suspense 1,500
Accumulated depreciation
Buildings 4,000
Plant and equipment 480
Motor vehicles 120
Retained earnings 560
Trade receivables 876
Purchases 4,200
Dividend paid 200
Sales revenue 11,752
Sales tax payable 1,390
Required
Prepare the following.
(a) Statement of profit or loss for the year ended 31 December 20X9 (3 marks)
(b) Statement of changes in equity for the year ended 31 December 20X9 (4 marks)
(c) Statement of financial position as at 31 December 20X9 (8 marks)
All statements are to be prepared in accordance with the requirements of IFRSs. Ignore taxation.
(Total: 15 marks)
ANSWER
USB LTD
STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 20X9
RWF’000
Revenue 11,752
Cost of sales (W2) (4,984)
Gross profit 6,768
Administrative expenses (W3) (2,822 )
Distribution costs (650 + 50 (W1)) (700 )
Profit for the year 3,246
(c)
USB LTD
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
AS AT 31 DECEMBER 20X9
RWF’000 RWF’000
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment (W4) 6,386
Current assets
Inventory 1,600
Trade receivables (876 – 76 – 40) 760
Cash 100
2,460
Total assets 8,846
Workings
1 Depreciation
RWF’000
Buildings (10,000 u 5%) 500
Plant (1,400 – 480) X20% 184
Motor vehicles (320 – 120) 25% 502
RWF’000
Opening inventory 2,200
Purchases 4,200
Depreciation (W1) 184
Closing inventory (1,600)
4,984
3 Administrative expenses RWF’000
Per T/B 2,206
Depreciation (W1) 500
Irrecoverable debt 76
Receivables allowance ((876 – 76) X5%) 40
2,822
4 Property, plant and equipment
Cost Acc. dep Dep. chg. Carrying amount
RWF’000 RWF’000 RWF’000 RWF’000
Buildings 10,000 4,000 500 5,500
Plant 1,400 480 184 736
Motor vehicles 320 120 50 150
11,720 4,600 734 6,386
5 Retained earnings
RWF’000
B/f per T/B 560
Prior period adjustment (inventory) (200)
Profit for period 3,246
Dividend paid (200)
3,406
The need for the disclosure of Earnings Per Share (EPS) is based on the increasing use of the
Price/Earnings
(P/E) ratio as a standard stock market indicator. The formula for the calculation of the P/E ratio is:
Market Price of Share
EPS
Therefore, the P/E ratio can be seen as a “purchase of a number of year’s earnings” but
perhaps more significantly, for many investors it also represents the future prospects of the
share. A higher P/E ratio is believed to indicate a faster growth in the company’s EPS in the
future. Conversely, the lower the P/E ratio, the lower the expected future growth.
The continued use of P/E ratios requires that the EPS, on which that ratio is based, should be
calculated and disclosed on a comparable basis as between one company and another and as
between one financial period and another, so far as this is possible.
In addition to this, the trend shown by a comparison of a company’s profits over time is a rather
crude measure of performance and can be misleading without careful interpretation of all the
events that the company has experienced. Particularly, this would be the case where a company
IAS 33 Earnings Per Share outlines the principles for the determination and presentation of EPS,
in order to improve comparisons between different companies in the same reporting period and
between different reporting periods for the same company.
B. SCOPE
IAS 33 applies to entities whose ordinary shares (or potential ordinary shares) are publicly traded
and to entities that are in the process of issuing shares (or potential ordinary shares) in public
securities markets.
C. DEFINITIONS
• Ordinary Share
An equity instrument that is subordinate to all other classes of equity instruments. It is an instrument
that falls under the definition of “equity shares” in IAS 32, i.e. a contract that evidences a residual
interest in the assets of an entity after deducting all of its liabilities. Ordinary shares participate in the
net profit for the period only after other types of shares, such as preference shares. An entity may
have more than one class of ordinary shares.
• Earnings
The earnings should be the after-tax net profit / loss after deducting preference dividends and
other appropriations for non-equity shares. All items of income and expense that are recognised in
a period, including exceptional items and non-controlling interests, are included in the determination
of net profit or loss for the period.
Profit
Less Tax
Less Non-Controlling Interest (in the case of group accounts)
Less Preference dividends (or other non-equity appropriations)
(a) The amount of any preference dividends on non-cumulative preference shares declared in
respect of the period;
OR
(b) The full amount of the required preference dividends for cumulative preference shares for the period,
whether or not the dividends have been declared, as the undeclared amount is still deductible as
an appropriation. The amount of preference dividends for the period does not include the amount
of any preference dividends for Cumulative Preference Shares paid or declared during the current
period in respect of previous periods.
Where an entity has more than one class of ordinary shares, the earnings for the period are
apportioned over different classes of shares in accordance with their dividend rights or other
rights.
CPA EXAMINATION I1.2 FINANCIAL REPORTING 143
STUDY MANUAL
D. NUMBER OF SHARES
For the purpose of calculating basic earnings per share, the number of shares should be the
weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period.
The weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period reflects the fact
that the amount of shareholders capital may be varied during the period as a result of a larger
or lesser number of shares being outstanding at any time. It is the number of ordinary shares
outstanding at the beginning of the period, adjusted by the number of ordinary shares bought
back or issued during the period multiplied by a time weighting factor.
The time weighting factor is the number of days that the specific shares are outstanding as a
proportion of the total number of days in the period (a reasonable approximation of the weighted
average is adequate in many circumstances).
EXAMPLE 1
Company X has 1,000,000 ordinary RWF1 shares and 500,000 RWF1 10% Cumulative
preference shares
RWF RWF
Solution
450,000 – 50,000
EPS is: = .40rwf
1,000,000
Note that if the preference shares were non-cumulative, the EPS would be
450,000 – 40,000
EPS is: = .41rwf
1,000,000
RWF
Earnings are: Profit after tax 1,500,000
Preference dividend (200,000)
1,300,000
Number of Ordinary Shares: 10,000,000
EPS: 13rwf
EXAMPLE 3
A company’s capital structure at 31st December 2010 comprised:
Solution
RWF1,000,000 - RWF500,000 -RWF100,000*
EPS = = 22..22rwf
1,800,000 shares
* RWF1,250,000 x 8% = RWF100,000
Example 4
CDE Ltd. reported profit before tax in the year ended 31st March 2010 of RWF95,000. Tax for
the year amounted to RWF40,000 and the company paid the preference dividend of RWF8,000.
The number of ordinary shares in issue at that date was 500,000.
Solution
RWF95,000 - RWF40,000 - RWF8,000
EPS = = .094rwf
500,000 shares
The rationale of this approach is that cash or other assets are introduced into the business during
the year as a result of the share issue. These assets should generate additional earnings for that
portion of the year for which they are issued. Therefore, in order to compare like with like, the
denominator should include the additional shares only for that portion of the year in which shares
are issued.
EXAMPLE
Company X issued 450,000 shares for RWF1 each on the 1st July 2010. This was in addition
to the
3,600,000 shares already in issue.
What is the EPS for the year ended 31st December 2010?
Solution
Number of Shares for EPS purposes:
3,600,000 x 6/12 = 1,800,000
+
4,050,000 x 6/12 = 2,025,000
Total 3,825,000
RWF396,000
EPS = = 0.1035 rwf
3,825,000 shares
2. Bonus or Capitalisation Issue
This is also sometimes referred to as a scrip issue. In this type of issue, ordinary shares are issued
to
existing shareholders for no additional consideration, i.e. for free. Therefore the number of shares
in issue is increased without an increase in resources.
Rule = Bonus shares are deemed to be issued on the 1st day of the earliest period being
reported (usually, the 1st day of the comparative year). The effect will be as if the bonus
shares had always been in issue.
Thus, no time weighting
Adjust previous years EPS
EXAMPLE
Company Y had earnings for EPS purposes of RWF75,000 in 2010.
The company issued a bonus issue of 1 for 5 half way through the year
Solution
A 1 for 5 bonus issue means 100,000 free shares were issued.
RWF75,000
EPS = = 0.125rwf
(500,000 + 100,000)
146 I1.2 FINANCIAL REPORTING CPA EXAMINATION
STUDY MANUAL
EXAMPLE
Et Ltd. had earnings in 2009 and 2010 of RWF360,000 and RWF396,000 respectively. At the start
of
2010, there were 3,600,000 ordinary shares in issue. In 2010, Et Ltd. made a 1 for 9 bonus issue.
Solution
2010 EPS Earnings 396,000
Shares 4,000,000
EPS .099rwf
2009 EPS (comparative) Earnings 360,000
Shares 4,000,000
EPS .09rwf
As an alternative to adjusting the 2009 EPS in the method shown above, it is also acceptable to
multiply the previous year’s EPS by a ‘bonus factor’. This bonus factor depends on the terms of
the bonus issue itself. In the question above, the bonus issue was a 1 for 9. Thus, the bonus factor
is 9/10th (a 1 for 2 issue would have a bonus factor of 2/3rd, a 1 for 3 issue would have a bonus
factor of 3/4th etc.).
In 2009, the EPS would have been calculated as .10rwf (RWF360,000/3,600,000). Thus, the
adjusted
2008 figure in the accounts for 2010 would be .10rwf x 9/10th =
.09rwf.
Note that even though the bonus shares were not issued until 2010, the comparative EPS figure
for 2009 is then recalculated to include the bonus shares as if they had existed back then. This is
done to preserve comparability between the periods.
3. Rights Issue
A rights issue is an issue of shares, pro rata, to existing shareholders. The exercise price is often
less than
the fair value of the shares. Therefore, such a rights issue includes a bonus element an in
calculating EPS, this has to be taken into consideration.
Rule = Calculate the “Theoretical Ex Rights Price”
Weight shares on a time basis
Adjust previous years EPS
The Theoretical Ex Rights Price is the price the shares will have, in theory, after the rights issue
occurs. The market price of the shares immediately before the rights issue takes place is often
referred to as the
“Cum Rights Price”.
Both the Theoretical Rx Rights Price and the Cum Rights Price are used in the calculation of EPS
and in the adjusting of the previous year’s EPS.
EXAMPLE
Company A had earnings (for EPS) of RWF396,000 in 2010 and RWF360,000 in
2009
RWF396,000
=.0931rwf
4,250,000
4. Share Exchange
Shares issued to acquire a subsidiary are deemed to be issued on the first day of the period for
which profits of new subsidiary are included in group earnings
This is because the results of the new subsidiary are only included in the consolidated accounts
from that date onwards.
EXAMPLE
Company X has 1 million shares in issue on 1st January 2010. On 30th September, Company X
acquired
80% of the Ordinary shares of Y Ltd.
As part of the consideration, Company X issued 600,000 ordinary shares with a market value of
RWF4 each
Solution
For the EPS calculation in 2010, the number of shares is:
= 1,150,000 shares
Comprehensive Example involving more than one change in the capital structure of a company
Extracts from the Statement of Financial Position of RDN as at 1st April 2010 are:
RWF’000 RWF’000
Ordinary shares of .25rwf each 4,000
8% Preference shares 1,000
Reserves
Share premium 700
Capital redemption reserve 1,300
Revaluation reserve 90
Retained earnings 750
The following draft Statement of Comprehensive Income has been prepared for the year to 31st
March
2011:
RWF’000 RWF’000
Profit before interest and tax 1,800
Loan interest (200)
Profit before tax 1,600
Taxation
Provision for 2011 300
Deferred tax 390
(400)
510
(i) A bonus issue of 1 new share for every 8 ordinary shares held was made on 7th September
2010
(ii) A fully subscribed rights issue of 1 new share for every 5 ordinary shares held at a price of .50
rwf’s each was made on 1st January 2011. Immediately prior to the issue, the market price of
RDN’s ordinary shares was RWF1.40 each
(iii) The EPS was correctly reported in last year’s accounts at .08 rwf’s
Solution
Earnings (910 – 80) RWF830,000
Number of Shares 01/04/10
Opening Balance 16,000,000
07/09/10
Bonus Issue (1 for 8) 2,000,000
1/1/11
Rights Issue (1 for 5) 3,600,000
31/3/11Closing Balance 21,600,000
* This fraction represents the ‘bonus factor’ and is used to factor in the effect of the bonus issue.
The bonus issue terms were 1 for 8, thus the bonus factor is 8/9.
If the entity reports a discontinued operation, it must disclose the EPS for the discontinued
operation either on the face of the Statement of Comprehensive Income or in the notes to the
financial statements.
If the entity makes a net loss for the period, the EPS is still calculated using the net loss (as
adjusted) as the numerator. Thus, the EPS will be a negative figure. Disclosure is still mandatory
when the EPS is negative.
H. RETROSPECTIVE ADJUSTMENTS
If the number of ordinary shares increases as a result of:
If these changes occur after the Statement of Financial Position date but before the financial
statements are authorised for issue, the EPS calculations for those and any prior period financial
statements presented must be based on the new number of shares. The fact that the EPS
calculation reflects such changes in the number of shares must be disclosed.
In addition, the EPS of all periods presented in the financial statements must be adjusted for
the effects of errors and adjustments arising from changes in accounting policies accounted for
retrospectively.
[Note that other major share transactions after the Statement of Financial Position date are Non-
Adjusting Events according to IAS 10 and so are not applied retrospectively. However, they must
be disclosed in the notes to the financial statements]
DEFINITION
Borrowing costs are interest and other costs incurred by an entity in connection with the
borrowing of funds. They may include, for example:
The Standard only applies to borrowing costs related to external borrowings and not to equity.
Therefore, the Standard does not deal with the imputed or actual cost of equity, including
preference share capital not classified as equity.
B. ACCOUNTING TREATMENT
IAS 23 Borrowing Costs regulates the extent to which entities are allowed to capitalise borrowing
costs incurred on money borrowed to finance the acquisition of certain assets.
Note that this is a departure from the previous position which existed up to 1st January 2009,
where a benchmark treatment and an allowed alternative were available to entities.
Other borrowing costs are recognised as an expense in the period they were incurred. A qualifying
asset is an asset that takes a substantial period of time to get ready for its intended use or sale.
Examples of such assets include:
• Inventories that require substantial time periods to bring them to saleable condition
• Manufacturing plants
• Investment properties
C. BORROWING COSTS ELIGIBLE FOR CAPITALISATION
When an entity borrows funds specifically to acquire a qualifying asset, the borrowing costs
relating to that asset should be readily identifiable. Such costs are directly attributable since they
would have been avoided if the asset had not been acquired, constructed or produced.
However, if the financing activity of an entity is centrally co-ordinated, it may be difficult to identify
the relationship between particular borrowings and a qualifying asset. In this case, IAS 23 says
that judgement must be exercised.
If funds are borrowed generally and used to obtain a qualifying asset, the amount of funds
eligible for capitalisation is calculated by applying a “capitalisation rate” to the cost of the asset.
This rate is the weighted average of the borrowing costs that are applicable to the borrowings of
On the other hand, if the funds have been specifically borrowed to acquire the asset, the amount
of funds that can be capitalised is calculated as follows:
D. COMMENCEMENT OF CAPITALISATION
The capitalisation of borrowing costs shall commence when:
E. CESSATION OF CAPITALISATION
The capitalisation of borrowing costs shall cease when substantially all the activities necessary
to prepare the qualifying asset for its intended use or sale are complete.
An asset is normally ready for use or sale when the physical construction of the asset is complete.
F. SUSPENSION OF CAPITALISATION
The capitalisation of borrowing costs should be suspended during extended periods in which
active development is interrupted.
Thus, for example, borrowing costs incurred during builders’ holidays would continue to be
capitalised, whereas borrowing costs incurred during prolonged industrial disputes would not be
capitalised.
G. INTEREST RATES
Where assets are financed by specific borrowings, IAS 23 requires that the cost of this specific
borrowing, related to the financing, be capitalised.
However, where the general borrowings of the company are used to finance qualifying assets,
then a weighted average cost of capital (excluding any specific borrowings) should be applied to
the average investment in the asset.
In addition, any interest from the temporary investment of any surplus funds relating to the
financing of the assets is treated as a reduction of the borrowing cost.
Example 1
On the 1st June 2010, SH. Limited commenced construction of a new factory that is expected
to take 3 years to complete. It is being financed entirely by a 3-year term loan of RWF6 million
(taken out at the start of construction).
How much interest must be capitalised under IAS 23 for the year ended 31st December 2010?
(You may use the straight-line method to amortise issue costs)
Solution
RWF
Interest* 315,000
PLUS
Issue costs** 17,500
LESS
Interest earned from temporary investment of funds (57,000)
Amount to be capitalised 275,500
* Interest
*Issue Costs
RWF6 million x 1.5% = RWF90,000
Amortised over three years, RWF30,000 per annum
Thus, for this year, RWF30,000 x 7/12 = RWF17,500
Example 2
S. Company Limited is constructing an investment property. Due to the poor state of the property
letting market, construction of this property was halted for the first three months of the year.
On the 30th September 2010, the company completed the property. Despite attempts to let the
property, it remained empty at the year end.
The average carrying value of the property, before the inclusion of the current years borrowing
cost, is RWF15 million.
The investment property has been financed out of funds borrowed generally for the purpose of
financing qualifying assets. The company’s weighted average cost of capital is 12% including
all borrowings. However, if a specific loan acquired to fund a different specific asset is excluded,
then the weighted average cost of capital is 10.5%.
How much interest must be capitalised under IAS 23 for the year ended 31st December 2010?
Solution
RWF15 million x 10.5% x 6/12 = RWF787,500
Note that borrowing costs should not be capitalised during periods when no construction or
development occurs. In addition, capitalisation should cease when the asset is ready for
use. In this example, this excludes capitalisation for the first 3 months and the last 3 months
of the year.
T. C Limited borrowed RWF12 million to help finance the construction of the plant. Interest on the
loan is 8% per annum.
Solution:
RWF
Cost of building 18,000,000
Borrowing costs RWF12m x 8% x 9/12 720,000
18,720,000
Example 4:
On 1st January 2009, H. Ltd began construction of a toll bridge. The construction is expected to
take 3.5 years. It is being financed by issuing bonds for RWF7 million at 12% per annum. The
bonds were issued at the beginning of the construction. The costs of issuing the bonds are 1.5%.
The project is also partly funded by the issue of share capital, with a 14% cost of capital. H. Ltd
has opted to capitalise borrowing costs, under IAS 23.
RWF
Interest on the bond = RWF7 million x 12% = 840,000
Amortisation of issue costs = (RWF7 million x 1.5%)/3.5 years = 30,000
Total to be capitalised = 840,000 + 30,000 = 870,000
H. DISCLOSURE
The financial statements must disclose:
INTRODUCTION
IAS 12 deals with the accounting treatment of tax liabilities. In this chapter, it is assumed that
the tax liability for the period has already been computed, and the entity now must deal with the
treatment of tax in the financial statements.
The title of the standard suggests that it deals with Income Tax only, but the standard deals with
any tax on company profits, regardless of what the tax is actually called (e.g. corporation tax).
• Current tax
• Deferred tax
B. CURRENT TAX
Current tax is the amount of tax payable (or recoverable) in respect of taxable profit (or allowable
loss) for the period. IAS 12 states that current tax for the current and prior periods should be
recognised as a liability in the Statement of Financial Position to the extent that it has not yet
been settled. To the extent that the amounts already paid exceed the amount due, than an asset
should be recognised.
In addition, a tax asset should be recognised in the event that the benefit of a tax loss can be
carried back to recover current tax of a prior period.
Current tax liabilities should be measured at the amount expected to be paid to the tax authorities.
Likewise, current tax assets should be measured at the amounts expected to be recovered from
the tax authorities. This means, in both situations, the amounts involved should be calculated
using the rates / laws that have either been enacted or substantially enacted at the reporting
date.
Current tax assets and liabilities should be shown separately in the financial statements. They
can only be offset if there is a legally enforceable right to do so and it is the entity’s intention to
offset them.
Any adjustments required to reflect any under or over provisions for tax in previous years should
be included in the tax charge (or credit) in the statement of comprehensive income for the current
period. It is, after all, merely the correction of an estimate, and is accounted for as such (i.e. it
does not necessitate a retrospective adjustment)
Example
FS Limited is preparing its financial statements for the year ended 30th June 2010. The following
information is relevant to the tax expense / liability at the year end:
• The current tax due is RWF2,500,000. This reflects the proposed new tax rates announced by
the government in an emergency budget in April 2010, which are to be enacted from August
2010 onwards. If the old rates are applied, the tax liability would be RWF2,100,000.
• During the year ended 30th June 2010, payments on account to the tax authorities
amounted to RWF1,100,000 in respect of current tax for 2010.
• Current tax for 2009 was over estimated by RWF125,000.
What is the tax expense and end-of-year liability to be shown in the financial statements for the
year ended 30thJune 2010?
Since the new tax rate is “substantially enacted” at the year end, the current tax for 2010 is
RWF2,500,000. The over-estimate in the previous year must also be factored in and this will result
in a tax expense in the statement of comprehensive income of RWF2,375,000 (RWF2,500,000
- RWF125,000).
C. DEFERRED TAX
Deferred tax is the estimated future tax consequences of transactions and events recognised
in the financial statements of the current and previous periods. The need for deferred tax arises
because the profit for tax purposes may differ from the profit shown in the financial statements.
The difference between accounting profit and taxable profit is caused by:
• Temporary differences
• Permanent differences
Deferred tax is a means of “ironing out” the tax inequalities arising from temporary differences.
Temporary Differences
These are differences between the carrying amount of an asset or liability in the statement of
financial position
and the tax base of the asset or liability. The tax base is the amount attributed to that asset or
liability for tax purposes (often known as the Tax Written Down Value).
A temporary difference arises when an item is allowable for both accounting and tax purposes,
but there is a difference in the timing of when the item is dealt with in the accounts and when it
is dealt with in the tax computations.
A common example of such a difference is capital expenditure. In the financial statements, the
expenditure will be depreciated over the life of the asset and this depreciation will be deducted
in arriving at accounting profit. However, in the tax computation, depreciation is not deductible. It
is added back and capital allowances (or tax depreciation) are granted instead. If the accounting
depreciation and capital allowances are calculated at a different rate, there will be a difference
between the accounting profit and the taxable profit.
This is a temporary difference because eventually, the cause of the difference will disappear
entirely. That is, the asset will eventually be fully depreciated and no further depreciation expense
in respect of that asset will appear in future Statement of Comprehensive Incomes and all capital
allowances will also have been claimed, leaving no further deductions in future tax computations
in respect of the asset.
Permanent Differences
Some income and expenses may not be chargeable / deductible for tax and therefore there will
be a permanent
difference between accounting and taxable profits. That is, the difference will not reverse in the
future
One-off differences between accounting and taxable profits caused by certain items not being
taxable /allowable
Deferred tax arises in respect of temporary differences only. Deferred tax is not concerned with
permanent differences.
Example 1
BT Ltd. purchased an item of machinery for RWF2,000,000 on 1st January 2008. It had an
estimated life of eight years and an estimated residual value of RWF400,000. The machine is
depreciated on a straight line basis. The tax authorities do not allow depreciation as a deductible
expense. Instead, a tax expense of 40% of the cost of
this type of asset can be claimed against income tax in the year of purchase and 20% per annum
(on a reducing
balance basis) of its tax base thereafter. The rate of income tax can be taken as 25%.
In respect of the above item of machinery, calculate the deferred tax charge / credit in BT Ltd
statement of comprehensive income for the years ended 31st December 2008, 2009 and 2010
and the deferred tax balance in the statements of financial position at those dates.
Solution
2,000,000 – 400,000
Annual accounting depreciation: = 200,000 per annum
8 years
RWF’000
RWF’000 RWF’000
Current Tax X
Deferred Tax 150
Total X
Non-Current Liabilities
Deferred Tax 150
RWF’000 RWF’000
Current Tax X
Deferred Tax 10
Total X
Non-Current Liabilities
Deferred Tax 160
RWF’000 RWF’000
Current Tax X
Deferred Tax (2)
Total X
Non-Current Liabilities
Deferred Tax 158
A similar process will be followed over the remaining useful life of the asset. By the end of
the assets life, the deferred tax liability will have fully reversed and there will be no remaining
balance in the Statement of Financial Position.
If deferred tax was ignored, a company’s tax charge for a particular period might bear little
resemblance to the reported profit. For example, if a company makes a large profit in a particular
period, but because of high levels of capital expenditure, it is entitled to claim large capital
allowances for that period, this would reduce the amount of tax it had to pay. The result of this
could be that the company reports a large profit and a small tax charge. This situation is usually
reversed in subsequent periods as tax charges appear to be much higher than the reported profit
suggests they should be.
It is argued that such a reporting system is misleading because the profit after tax, which is used
to calculate the company’s EPS, may appear disconnected from the pre-tax profit. This may
mean that a government’s fiscal (taxation) policy may distort a company’s profit trends.
Providing for deferred tax reduces this anomaly or inconsistency but it can never be entirely
eliminated due to items in the profit and loss that may never be allowed for tax purposes
(permanent differences).
This “liability approach” is the general principle on which IAS 12 bases the calculation of deferred
tax. The effect of this is that it usually brings the total tax charge (i.e. the provision for the current
year’s income tax plus the deferred tax) into proportion with to the profit reported to shareholders.
The main debate in the area of providing for deferred tax is whether the provision meets the
definition of a liability. If the liability is likely to crystallise (actually develop), then it is a liability.
However, if it will not crystallise in the foreseeable future, then arguably it is not a liability and
should not be provided for. The standard setters take a prudent approach and the standard does
not accept the latter argument.
The main benefits, therefore, of providing for deferred tax are as follows:
• Profit after tax, used to calculate EPS, may bear little resemblance to the pre-tax profit. If the
tax charge is fluctuating because of the way in which certain items are treated for tax, the EPS
will fluctuate too. Thus, providing for deferred tax reduces the fluctuation caused by temporary
differences.
• The EPS is used in the calculation of the Price Earnings (P/E) ratio, which in turn can impact
on share price. Without providing for deferred tax, the share price may be adversely affected
by government fiscal policy.
• Over-statement of profit, by not allowing for deferred tax, can lead to demands for
consequently over- optimistic dividends.
• Shareholders may be misled in relation to the performance of the company.
• Accounting for deferred tax satisfies the accruals concept in that the cost of the asset is
matched with the benefit of that asset over its useful life.
F. DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES AND ASSETS
Liabilities:
IAS 12 requires that a deferred tax liability must be recognised for all taxable temporary differences
(with minor exceptions). A taxable temporary difference arises where the carrying value of an
asset is greater than its tax
base.
Assets:
IAS 12 requires that deferred tax assets should be recognised for all deductible temporary
differences. A
deductible temporary difference arises where the tax base of an asset exceeds its carrying
value. The deferred tax asset will be recognised to the extent that taxable profit will be available
against which the deductible temporary difference can be utilised.
G. TAX RATE
The tax rate in force (or expected to be in force) when the asset is realised or the liability is
settled should be used to calculate deferred tax.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities should not be discounted to present value.
The revaluation of non-current assets results in taxable temporary differences and therefore a
liability. This is charged as a component of Other Comprehensive Income alongside the revaluation
gain itself. It is therefore disclosed either in the statement of comprehensive income or in a separate
statement showing other comprehensive income.
Example
At 31st December 2010, the carrying value of property plant and equipment was RWF88 million
and its tax base was RWF54 million. The carrying value of RWF88 million includes a surplus
of RWF12 million that arose as a result of a property revaluation on 31st December 2010. This
revaluation had no effect on
the tax base of the property. The property had not previously been revalued. The tax rate
is 25%.
The deferred tax liability at 31st December 2009 was RWF4 million. This liability related to taxable
temporary differences for property, plant and equipment.
At the year end 31st December 2010, the deferred tax calculation is as follows:
RWF’000
Carrying value 88,000
Tax base 54,000
Temporary difference 34,000
Tax rate 25%
Deferred Tax Liability 8,500
But, part of the difference is caused by the revaluation.
Thus, the deferred tax on the revaluation is: RWF12 million x 25% = RWF3 million. This
goes directly to equity (and Other Comprehensive Income).
RWF’000
Increase in liability 4,500
The required journal entries are:
RWF’000 RWF’000
2. Impairment Losses:
An impairment loss gives rise to a reduction in the carrying amount of an asset and a consequent
change in the deferred tax provision.
Example
Property with a carrying value of RWF100,000 is impaired by RWF20,000 at the end of the
financial year. The tax base of RWF60,000 is unaffected by the impairment. The tax rate is 25%.
Thus, the deferred tax provision is reduced by RWF5,000 (i.e. RWF20,000 x 25%)
RWF RWF
3. Leasing:
A finance lease transaction can give rise to deferred tax implications. This is caused by the
temporary
differences arising on the treatment of the lease for accounting and tax purposes. The Statement
of Comprehensive Income will include a finance cost and depreciation expense. However, it is the
lease payment itself that may be allowable for tax purposes for the period.
Example
ST Limited entered into a finance lease arrangement on 1st January 2010. The lease rental for the
year was RWF6,000. The Statement of Comprehensive Income was charged with depreciation of
RWF2,910 and a finance cost of RWF2,274. The tax rate is 25%.
RWF RWF
Example:
Since July 2009, ELN Limited has been carrying out a project to develop a more efficient production
process. On the 1st April 2010, the project was assessed and found to be at a stage that justified
capitalising future costs incurred on the project. Accordingly, an intangible asset of RWF900,000
was included in the draft Statement of Financial Position at 31st December 2010. Amortisation is
expected to begin sometime in the year ended 31st December 2012. All expenditure on the project
qualifies for tax relief as the expenditure is incurred. The tax rate is 25%.
RWF
Carrying amount 900,000
Tax base 0
Temporary Difference 900,000
Tax rate 25%
Deferred Tax Liability 225,000
The required journal entries are:
RWF RWF
Debit Statement of Comprehensive Income (tax charge) 225,000
Example
On 1st December 2010, A. Limited sold goods to one of its subsidiaries for RWF4,000,000. The
goods cost A Ltd RWF3,000,000 to manufacture. Prior to the year end 31st December 2010, the
subsidiary sold 40% of the goods to a non-group company for RWF2,200,000. The tax rate is
25%.
The profit on the inter company sale was RWF1,000,000. 60% of the goods remain in inventory
at the year end; therefore 60% of the profit remains also. Thus, in the consolidated accounts, an
adjustment must be made for RWF600,000.
This RWF600,000 is a temporary difference, as it treated in different periods for accounting and
tax purposes.
I. DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
There are extensive disclosure requirements in relation to tax. The main disclosures are:
The tax expense (income) should be presented on the face of the Statement of Comprehensive
Income.
The major components of the tax expense (income) should be disclosed separately in a note.
An explanation of the relationship between tax expense (income) and accounting profit in either
or both of the following forms:
• A numerical reconciliation between tax expense (income) and the product of accounting profit
multiplied by the applicable tax rate, disclosing also the basis on which the applicable tax rate
is computed
• A numerical reconciliation between the average effective tax rate and the applicable tax rate,
disclosing also the basis on which the applicable tax rate is computed.
The standard should be applied to the presentation of all types of financial instruments, whether
recognised or unrecognised. Certain items are excluded including subsidiaries, associates,
joint ventures and insurance contracts.
Definitions
Financial Instrument: any contract that gives rise to both a financial asset of one entity and a
financial liability or equity instrument of another entity.
1. Cash
2. An equity instrument of another entity
3. A contractual right to receive cash or another financial asset from another entity; or to exchange
4. A contract that will or may be settled in the entity’s own equity instruments and is:
4.1. A non derivative for which the entity is or may be obliged to receive a variable number of the
entity’s own equity instruments; or
4.2. A derivative that will or may be settled other than by the exchange of a fixed amount of cash
or other financial asset for a fixed number of the entity’s own equity instruments
1. A contractual obligation:
1.1. To deliver cash or another financial asset to another entity; or
1.2. To exchange financial instruments with another entity under conditions that are potentially
unfavourable; or
2. A contract that will or may be settled in the entity’s own equity instruments and is:
2.1. A non derivative for which the entity is or may be obliged to deliver a variable number of the
entity’s own instruments, or
2.2. A derivative that will or may be settled other than by exchange of a fixed amount of cash or another
financial asset for a fixed number of the entity’s own equity instruments.
Equity instrument: any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of an entity after
deducting its liabilities
Fair value: the amount that an asset could be exchanged, or a liability settled, between informed and
willing parties, in an arm’s length transaction, other than in a forced or liquidation sale
Derivative: a financial instrument or other contract with all three of the following characteristics:
1. Its value changes in response to the change in a specified interest rate, financial instrument
price, commodity price, foreign exchange rate, index of prices or rates, credit rating or credit index,
or other variable
2. It requires no initial net investment or an initial net investment that is smaller than would be required
for other types of contracts that would be expected to have a similar response to changes in market
factors, and
The main difference between a liability and an equity instrument is the fact that an equity instrument has
no obligation to transfer economic benefits.
CPA EXAMINATION I1.2 FINANCIAL REPORTING 165
STUDY MANUAL
Compound Financial Instruments
Some financial instruments contain both a liability and an equity element. IAS 32 requires the financial
instrument to be split between the component parts and separately presented on the statement of
financial
position.
One of the most common types of component financial instruments is convertible debt. This contains a
primary financial liability for the entity but also gives the holder an option to convert to equity. Basically
this is identical to a liability and a warrant to issue equity.
Example:
On the 1st January 2006, FB Ltd issued RWF80 million 8% convertible loan stock at par. The stock
is convertible into equity shares, or redeemable at par, on the 31st December 2010, at the
option of the stockholders. The terms of conversion are that each RWF100 of loan stock will be
convertible into 50 equity shares of FB Ltd. A finance consultant has advised that if the option to
convert to equity had not been included in the terms of the issue, then a coupon rate of 12% would
have been required to attract subscribers for the stock.
The value of RWF1 receivable at the end of each year at a discount rate of
12% can be taken as:
RWF
Year
1 0.89
2 0.80
3 0.71
4 0.64
5 0.57
Show the initial journal entry to record the issue of the convertible debt and the statement of
comprehensive income finance charge for the year 31st December 2006 and the SOFP extracts
at the same date in respect of the issue of the convertible debt.
Solution
Calculate the liability component first. This is valued at the Present Value of cash flows associated
with the
convertible debt, discounted at the market rate for similar bonds with no conversion rights.
The difference between this Present Value and the net proceeds constitute the equity element.
At the end of the year, the liability value will have changed:
Year Opening Balance (12%) Finance Closing
Charge Payments Balance
RWF’000 RWF’000 RWF’000 RWF’000
1 68,704 8,244 6,400 70,548
2 70,548 8,466 6,400 72,614
3 72,614 8,714 6,400 74,928
4 74,928 8,991 6,400 77,519
5 77,519 9,302 86,400 -
(The closing balance for year 1 will be the opening balance for year 2, and so on)
Thus:
Statement of Comprehensive Income Extracts
Terms
Market risk – one of currency, interest or price risk
Currency risk – is the risk that the value of a financial instrument will fluctuate to changes in foreign
exchange rates
Interest rate risk – is the risk that the value of a financial instrument will fluctuate due to changes in
market interest rates
Price risk – is the risk that the value of a financial instrument will fluctuate as a result of changes in
market prices whether those changes are caused by factors specific to the individual instrument or its
issuer or factors affecting all securities traded on the market
Credit risk – is the risk that one party to a financial instrument will fail to discharge an obligation and
cause the other party to incur a financial loss
Liquidity risk – is the risk that an entity will encounter difficulty in raising funds to meet commitments
associated with financial risk. Liquidity risk may result from an inability to sell a financial asset quickly at
close to its fair value
Information to be Disclosed
Information must be disclosed about the following:-
• Risk management policies and hedging strategies
• Terms, conditions and accounting policies
• Interest rate risk
• Credit risk
• Fair value
Material items of income, expense, gains and losses resulting from financial assets and
liabilities.
For contract A, the entity does not recognise a liability for the copper until the goods have been
delivered. The contract is not a financial instrument as it involves a physical asset as opposed to a
financial asset.
For contract B, the entity recognises a financial liability (obligation) on the commitment date, rather
than waiting for the closing date in which the exchange takes place.
Derecognition
An entity should derecognise a financial asset when:
An entity should derecognise a financial liability when it is extinguished, ie when the obligation specified
in the contract is discharged, cancelled or expires. A financial liability may be partially derecognised if
only part of the obligation is removed.
The exception to this is where the financial instrument is designated as at fair value through profit or
loss. In this case transaction costs are not added/subtracted from or to fair value at initial recognition.
If the fair value is not readily available at recognition date it must be estimated using an appropriate
technique.
Subsequent Measurement
After initial recognition all financial instruments should be re-measured to fair value without any
deduction for transaction costs that may be incurred on sale of or other disposal, except for:
• Loans and receivables
• Held to maturity investments
• Investments in equity instruments that do not have a quoted market price in an actively traded
market and whose fair value cannot be reliably measured and derivatives thatare linked to and
must be settled by delivery of such unquoted equity instruments.
Loans and receivables and held to maturity investments should be measured at amortised cost
using the effective interest method.
Investments whose fair value cannot be reliably measured should be measured at cost.
For a financial instrument to be held to maturity it must meet certain criteria. These criteria are
not met if:-
• The entity intends to hold the financial asset for an undefined time
• The entity stands ready to sell the asset in response to changes in interest rates or risks,
liquidity needs and similar factors
• The issuer has a right to settle the financial asset at an amount significantly below its
amortised cost
• It does not have the resources available to continue to finance the investment until maturity
• It is subject to an existing legal or other constraint that could frustrate its intention to hold the
financial asset to maturity
• There is a penalty for selling or reclassifying an asset that was designated as held to maturity.
If this has occurred during the current financial year or during the two preceding financial
years then no asset can be classed as held to maturity.
Available for sale financial assets: gains and losses are recognised in reserves and on disposal
of the asset the balance in equity is transferred to the profit and loss account to allow the profit/
loss on disposal be calculated.
Financial instruments carried at amortised cost: gains and losses are recognised in profit and
loss as a result of the amortisation process and when the asset is derecognised.
Financial assets and financial liabilities that are hedged items: special rules apply.
• Add certain new disclosures about financial instruments to those currently required by IAS 32
• Puts all financial instruments disclosures in a new standard. (The remaining parts of IAS 32
deal only with presentation matters).
Disclosure Requirements
An entity must group its financial instruments into classes of similar instruments and make
disclosures by class (when disclosures are required).
• Special disclosures about financial assets and financial liabilities designated to be measured
at fair value through profit and loss
• Reclassifications of financial instruments from fair value to amortised cost or vice versa
• Information about financial assets pledged as collateral (or held as collateral)
• Reconciliation of the allowance account for credit losses (bad debts)
• Information about compound financial instruments with multiple embedded derivatives
• Breaches of terms of loan agreements
• Disclosures about de-recognitions
Other disclosures:
(Note that disclosure of fair values is not required when the carrying amount is a reasonable
approximation of fair value, such as short term trade receivables and payables or for instruments
whose fair value cannot be measured reliably).
Information About The Nature And Extent Of Risks Arising From Financial Instruments.
Qualitative disclosures:
These describe:
Quantitative disclosures:
The quantitative disclosures provide information about the extent to which the entity is exposed
to risk, based on information provided internally to the entity’s key management personnel.
These include:
• summary quantitative data about exposure to each risk at the reporting date
• disclosures about credit risk, liquidity risk and market risk
• concentrations of risk
Credit Risk:
Includes:
• maximum amount of exposure, description of collateral, information about credit quality of
financial assets that are neither past due or impaired for financial assets that are past due
or impaired, analytical disclosures re required
Liquidity Risk:
Includes:
• a maturity analysis of financial liabilities
• description of approach to risk management
Market Risk:
This is the risk that the fair value or cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate due to
changes in market prices. Market risk reflects interest rate risk, currency risk and other price
risks
A. INTRODUCTION
IFRS 1 was issued to ensure that an entity’s first IFRS financial statements, and any interim
financial reports for part of the period covered by those financial statements, contain high quality
information that:
IFRS 1 applies to all entities adopting IFRS for the first time on or after 1st January 2004.
A first time adopter is an entity that presents its first IFRS financial statements. The entity must
make an explicit or unreserved statement that the annual financial statements comply with all
relevant IFRS’s.
The date of transition to IFRS’s is the beginning of the earliest period for which an entity
presents full comparative information under IFRS’s in its first IFRS financial statements.
IFRS 1 states that the starting point for the adoption of IFRS’s for the year ended 31st December
2005 is to prepare an opening IFRS balance sheet at 1st January 2004 (or the beginning of the
earliest comparative period).
The general rule is that this balance sheet will need to comply with each IFRS effective at 31st
December 2005 (the reporting date).
The opening balance sheet need not be published. Its main function is to provide opening
balances in order that future financial statements can be prepared in accordance with IFRS.
B. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The entity must use the same accounting policies in its opening IFRS balance sheet and
throughout all periods presented in its IFRS financial statements.
Those accounting policies must comply with each IFRS effective at the reporting date for its first
IFRS financial statements (except with exemptions apply).
• At the effective date of transition, it is not totally clear which IFRS’s will be in force two years
later.
Thus, the originally prepared balance sheet may have to be amended several times prior to the
publication of the first IFRS financial statements.
The entity cannot apply different versions of IFRS’s that were effective at earlier dates. However,
an entity may apply a new IFRS that is not yet mandatory if it permits early application.
• The costs of retrospectively applying the recognition and measurement principles of IFRS’s
might be considerable. IFRS 1 grants a limited number of exemptions from the general
requirements where the cost of complying with them would be likely to exceed the benefits to
users.
• The accounting policies used in the opening IFRS Statement of Financial Position may differ
from those that it used for the same date using previous GAAP. The resulting adjustments
arise from events and transactions before the date of transition to IFRS’s.
The entity must recognise those adjustments in retained earnings (or, if appropriate, another
category of equity) at the date of transition to IFRS’s.
The entity must explain how the transition from previous GAAP to IFRS’s affected its reported
financial position, financial performance and cash flows.
If a subsidiary adopts IFRS’s later than the parent, the subsidiary may value its assets/liabilities
either:
• At its own transition date; or
• Its parents.
D. COMPARATIVE INFORMATION
To comply with IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements, an entity’s first IFRS financial
statements must include at least one year of comparative information under IFRS’s.
Question
“One issue that will involve significant changes in accounting policy and have corresponding
disclosure issues
is the rules on first-time adoption of IFRS. Many companies are starting to transfer their financial
statements from a previous GAAP into IFRS and are therefore having to restate those accounts”
IFRS 1 First time adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards addresses the issues
in completing this conversion.
Requirement
Draft a memo to the finance director of a client company explaining how IFRS 1 details the
manner in which his
company should implement a change from local accounting standards to international
standards, making specific reference to the following:
Tutorial Comment
This question focuses the candidate on the transition guidance from accounting under
local GAAP to accounting under international standards.
The candidate is specifically asked to explain the guidance relating to four key areas:
The candidate should be aware of the steps which must be taken when implementing IFRS for
the first time and should also be familiar with the additional disclosures that are required in the
initial reporting period.
Solution
I refer to our recent telephone conversation and hereby outline the issues discussed concerning
the first time adoption of IFRS.
IFRS 1 was introduced to help ensure that an entity’s first IFRS financial statements will contain
high quality financial information that allows transparency and comparability for all periods
presented and that these financial statements can be generated in a cost efficient manner.
In the case of excessive cost of restatement, certain exemptions are permitted under the standard.
These exemptions are independent of each other and are optional. They include the following:
• Business Combinations
An entity need not apply IFRS 3 Business Combinations retrospectively to business combinations
recognised under previous GAAP. However, if an entity wishes to avail of this exemption, it must
ensure that all combinations keep the same classification as in previous GAAP financial
statements; if an entity restates any business combinations to comply with IFRS 3, it must also
restate all later business combinations. For example, if a first-time adopter elects to restate a
• Financial Instruments
IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation requires an entity to split a compound
financial instrument at inception in to separate liability and equity components. Under IFRS 1,
first-time adopter is not required to separate these two portions as the liability component is no
longer outstanding at the date of transition.
The accounting policies that an entity uses in its opening IFRS Statement of Financial Position
may differ from those it used for reporting under the previous GAAP. Any adjustment to the
opening net assets should be recognised against retained earnings.
(iii) Making estimates under IFRS for both the opening IFRS Statement of Financial
Position and other periods presented
Estimates on transition should be consistent with estimates made at the same date under previous
GAAP (after any adjustments to reflect differences in accounting policies) unless there is objective
evidence that those estimates were in error.
An entity may also need to make new estimates under IFRS at the date of transition if no such
amount was recognised by previous GAAP.
(iv) Disclosures in the first IFRS accounts
An entity must include at least one year of comparative financial information. There are however
certain exemptions regarding the provision of comparative for financial instruments. If an entity
avails of such an exemption it may apply its previous GAAP and disclose this fact, together with the
nature of the main adjustments what would make the information comply with the IFRS guidance
on financial instruments.
An entity must also explain the effect of the transition from previous GAAP to IFRS on financial
performance, financial position and cashflows.
It must do so by providing reconciliations of (i) equity at date of transition and at Statement of
Financial Position date and (ii) reported profit and loss highlighting values under previous GAAP to
those under IFRS. These reconciliations must provide the readers with sufficient detail to understand
the material adjustments to the Statement of Financial Position, the Statement of Comprehensive
Income and to the cashflow statement, if prepared under previous GAAP.
If an entity recognised or reversed any impairment losses for the first time in preparing its opening
IFRS Statement of Financial Position, the first IFRS Financial Statements must include the
disclosures that IAS
36 Impairment of Assets would have required if the entity had recognised those impairment losses
or reversals in the period beginning with the date of transition to IFRS.
If an entity corrects any errors made under previous GAAP the reconciliations must distinguish the
correction of errors from changes in accounting policies.
Where fair value has been used as deemed cost, the entity’s first IFRS financial statements shall
disclose for each line item in the opening IFRS Statement of Financial Position the aggregate of
those fair values and the aggregate adjustment to the carrying amounts reported under previous
GAAP.
I trust that my response will clarify the issues raised if you have any further queries please
contact me.
178 I1.2 FINANCIAL REPORTING CPA EXAMINATION
STUDY MANUAL
INTERIM FINANCIAL REPORTING IAS 34
INTRODUCTION
IAS 34 recognises the usefulness of timely and reliable interim financial reporting in improving the
ability of investors, creditors and others to understand an entity’s capacity to generate earnings
and cash flows and its financial condition and liquidity.
The standard does not oblige entities to publish interim financial reports. However, entities
whose debt or equity securities are publicly traded are often required by governments, stock
exchanges, accountancy bodies, etc to publish interim financial reports.
If interim financial reports are published and purport to comply with IFRSs, then IAS 34 governs
their content. Each financial report, annual or interim, is evaluated on its own for conformity to
IFRSs. If an entity’s interim
financial report is described as complying with IFRSs, it must comply with all of the requirements
of IAS 34.
The interim period is a financial period shorter than a full financial year. The interim financial
report means a financial report containing either a full set of financial statements (in accordance
with IAS 1) or a set of condensed financial statements (as outlined in IAS 34) for an interim
period.
If the entity publishes a set of condensed financial statements in its interim financial report, those
condensed statements should include, at a minimum each of the headings and subtotals that
were included in its most recent annual financial statements, together with selected explanatory
notes as outlined by IAS 34.
The recognition and measurement principle should be the same as those used in the main
financial statements. Additional line items or notes should be included if their omission would
render the interim reports misleading. Basic and diluted earnings per share should be presented
on the face of an Statement of Comprehensive Income for an interim period.
If, however, an entity chooses to publish a complete set of financial statements in its interim
financial report, the form and content of those statements must conform to IAS 1 for a complete
set of financial statements.
• A statement that the same accounting policies used for the interim report were used for the
most recent annual financial statements. If the policies have changed a description of the
nature and effect of the change must be given.
• Explanatory comments about the seasonality or cyclicality of interim operations.
• The nature and amount of items that are unusual because of their nature, size or incidence.
• The nature and amount of changes in estimates of amounts reported in prior interim periods
of the current financial year and if those changes have a material effect in the current interim
period.
• Issuances, repurchases and repayments of debt and equity securities.
• Dividends paid.
• Segment revenue and segment results for business or geographical segments, whichever is the
primary basis of segment reporting (only disclose segment reporting in interim accounts if it is
required in the full annual accounts).
• Material events after the end of the interim period that have not been reflected in the interim
accounts.
• The effect of changes in the composition of the entity during the interim period e.g.
business combinations.
• Changes in contingent liabilities or contingent assets since the last annual statement of financial
position date.
If an entity’s interim financial report is in compliance with IAS 34, this fact should be disclosed.
To be in compliance, it must comply with all of the requirements of IFRSs.
E. MATERIALITY
In recognising, measuring, classifying or disclosing items for the interim report, materiality for the
interim period must be assessed. But, in assessing materiality, it must be recognised that interim
statements may rely on estimates to a greater extent than measurements of annual financial
data.
• Revenue received and costs incurred seasonally or unevenly should not be anticipated
or deferred when preparing interim financial statements unless that treatment would be
appropriate at the end of the year.
• If there is a change in accounting policy during a financial year, figures for prior interim periods
of the current financial year should be adjusted for the change, so that the same accounting
policies are in force throughout the year.
Thus, if a company is preparing interim accounts for six months, it will report actual figures for
those six months. This is the case even if the business is seasonal in nature, with only, say 30%
of its sales being made in those six months.
Tax is the only exception to this rule. Tax is computed for the period by charging the expected
rate of tax for the year to the profits of the interim period.
AGRICULTURE IAS 41
A. INTRODUCTION
Agriculture is fundamentally different from other types of business. Instead of wearing out or being
consumed over time, many agricultural assets actually grow. It can be argued that depreciation is
irrelevant in this situation. Hence, biological assets are measured at fair value and any changes
in fair value are reported as part of net profit for the period.
As a result, not only will a farmer’s profit on sales be recorded but so too will increases in the
value of the farms productive assets as a whole.
At first glance, this may appear counter-intuitive as it departs from the traditional accounting
realisation concept, where a profit is not recognised before a sale has been made. In the case
of forestry for example, IAS
41 allows profits to be recognised years before the products are even ready for sale. In fact, IAS
41 particularly impacts upon agricultural activities where the income-producing biological
assets are expected to have economic lives that extend beyond one accounting period.
However, the rationale is that by requiring all changes in the value of a farm to be reported openly
and transparently, farm managers will be unable to boost profits by selling off an unsustainable
amount of produce. An example of this would be where a forestry company could show large
short-term profits by cutting down and selling all trees without replacing them. The profit would
reflect the sales but ignore the fall in the value of the forest.
The change in the fair value of biological assets has two dimensions:
Separate disclosure of these two elements is encouraged but not required. Where biological
assets are harvested, then fair value measurement ceases at the time of harvest and after that,
IAS 2 Inventories applies.
B. DEFINITIONS
Agricultural activity: the management by an entity of the biological transformation of biological
assets for sale into agricultural assets or into additional biological assets.
Agricultural produce: the harvested product of the entity’s biological assets, for example, milk,
apples, coffee beans.
Harvest: is the detachment of produce from a biological asset or the cessation of a biological
asset’s life processes.
Active Market: a market where the items traded are homogenous, willing buyers and sellers can
be found at any time and prices are available to the public.
Fair Value: the amount for which an asset can be exchanged or a liability settled in an arm’s
length transaction between knowledgeable and willing parties. The fair value of an asset is based
on its present condition and location.
This standard shall be applied to account for the following when they relate to agricultural activity:
• Biological assets
• Agricultural produce at the point of harvest
• Government grants related to agricultural activities
A biological asset shall be measured on initial recognition and at each subsequent Statement of
Financial Position date at fair value less point of sale costs, except where the fair value cannot
be estimated reliably.
Agricultural produce harvested from biological assets shall be measured at fair value less point
of sale costs at the point of harvest. Unlike a biological asset, there is no exception in cases in
The point of sale costs include commissions payable to brokers and dealers, levies by regulatory
agencies and commodity exchanges, transfer taxes and duties. Point of sale costs exclude
transport and other costs necessary to get assets to markets.
If an active market does not exist which would allow the assessment of fair value then the
company may employ some of the following to assist in determining fair value:-
• Assess the most recent market price, provided there has not been a significant change in
economic circumstances between the date of that transaction and the Statement of Financial
Position date
• Consider market prices for similar assets with adjustments to reflect differences and
• Use sector benchmarks such as the value of an orchard expressed per tray, bushel,
kilogramme or hectare and the value of beef-cattle expressed per kg of meat
If an entity has access to different markets, then the entity should choose the most relevant and
reliable price that is the one at which it is most likely to sell the asset.
In some cases, market prices or values may not be available for an asset in its present condition.
In these cases, the entity can use the present value of the expected net cash flow from the asset,
discounted at a current market pre-tax rate. In some circumstances, costs may be an indicator
of fair values, especially where little biological transformation has taken place or the impact of
biological transformation on the price is not expected to be significant.
The standard specifically requires that fair value is not determined by reference to a future
sales contract. Contract prices are not necessarily relevant in determining fair value, because
fair value reflects the current market value in which a willing buyer and seller would enter into
a transaction. Consequently, the fair value of the biological asset or agricultural produce is not
adjusted because of the existence of a contract.
The difficulty in establishing the fair value of a biological asset increases when the asset is a
“bearer asset”. This is an asset which itself will not eventually become agricultural produce. The
problem is exacerbated the more long-lived the asset is.
Coffee bushes - they take 3-4 years to mature then may live and produce fruit/beans for a further
10 years or more. The standard does not require external independent valuations but, in such
cases where fair values are otherwise difficult to determine, it may be possible and appropriate to
apply IAS 36 Impairment to determine both the value in use and the net selling price of the asset
and to use the higher of these two amounts to represent valuation.
When the presumption that fair value can be established can be rebutted, and until such time as
a fair value becomes measurable with reliability, the asset is carried on the statement of financial
position at cost less any accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses. All
the other biological assets of the entity must still be measured at fair value. IAS 41 also contains
additional disclosure requirements in such a situation.
Only mature trees have established fair values by reference to a quoted price in an active market.
The fair value (inclusive of transport costs to get 100 logs to market) for a mature tree of the
same grade as in the plantation is:
As at 31st December 2009: RWF171
As at 31st December 2010: RWF165
Thus at 31st December 2009, the mature plantation would have been valued at RWF17,100,
while the following year, the mature plantation would have been valued at RWF16,500.
Assuming immaterial cash flow between now and the point of harvest, the fair value (and
therefore the amount reported as an asset in the statement of financial position) of the plantation
is estimated as follows:
31st December 2009 Present value of RWF17,100 discounted at 6% for 20 years = RWF5,332
The change in fair value (less estimated point of sale costs) of a biological asset between two
period end dates is reported as a gain or loss in the statement of comprehensive income.
A gain or loss arising on initial recognition of agricultural produce at fair value less estimated
point of sale costs is included in net profit or loss for the period.
In the example above, the difference in fair value of the plantation between 31st December 2009
and 2010is RWF121 (5,453 – 5,332). This will be reported in the Statement of Comprehensive
Income as a gain (irrespective of the fact that it has not yet been realised). The aggregate gain
of RWF121 is attributed to two factors:
• The effect of change in market price; and
• The physical change (growth) of the trees in the plantation. The aggregate gain is analysed as
follows:
• The price change, which, at the biological asset’s state as at the previous
accounting year end,
represents:
The value of the biological asset at prices prevailing as at the current accounting
year end less the value of the biological asset at prices prevailing as at the previous
accounting year end.
That is, 16,500 discounted at 6% for 19 years less 16,500 discounted at 6% for 20 years.
Thus, the aggregate is: 187 (loss) + 308 (gain) = 121 net gain.
A government grant that is related to a biological asset measured at fair value less estimated point
of sale costs should be recognised as income when the government grant becomes receivable.
If there are conditions attached to the grant, then the entity will only recognise the government
grant when the conditions attaching thereto are complied with.
IAS 20 is applied only to a government grant that is related to a biological asset which has been
measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses.
IAS 41 does not deal with grants related to agricultural produce. These grants may include
subsidies. Subsidies are normally payable when the produce is sold and would therefore be
recognised as income on the sale.
F. DISCLOSURE
IAS 41 requires extensive disclosures, including:
• The aggregate gain or loss arising during the current accounting period on initial recognition of
biological assets and agricultural produce and from the change in fair value less point of sale
costs of biological assets
• The fair value less estimated point of sale costs of agricultural produce harvested during the
period, determined at the point of harvest
• The existence and carrying amounts of biological assets whose title is restricted, and the
carrying amounts of biological assets pledged as security for liabilities;
• The amount of commitments for the development or acquisition of biological assets
• Financial risk management strategies related to agricultural activity
• A reconciliation of the changes in carrying value of biological assets between the beginning
and end of the current period including
A. INTRODUCTION
Large companies can often operate within several different business sectors and/or in different
geographical locations. Each of these sectors/locations can involve risks and opportunities that
can differ significantly from each other. For example, while an entity’s toy division might be facing
stiff competition from imports, its food division might be performing very well and expanding
market share rapidly.
If the results of all divisions of the company are amalgamated into a single set of financial
statements without any analysis of divisional performance, it would be very difficult for users of
these statements to engage in a meaningful measure of company performance for the period.
Thus, IFRS 8 requires entities within the scope of the standard to disclose information that will
allow users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business activities in which it
engages and the economic environments in which it operates.
IFRS 8 Operating Segments applies only to organisations whose equity or debt securities are
publicly traded and to organisations that are in the process of issuing equity or debt securities
in public securities markets. Should other organisations opt to disclose segment information
in financial statements that comply with international financial reporting standards, they must
comply fully with the requirements of IFRS 8.
According to the core principle of IFRS 8, an entity should disclose information to enable users
of its financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the types of business
activities in which it engages and the economic environments in which it operates.
The emphasis is now on disclosing segmental information for external reporting purposes based
on internal reporting within the entity to its “chief operating decision maker”. The IASB believes
that the requirement to report segmental information using the approach adopted by IFRS 8 (that
is, a “management approach”) allows the users of the financial statements to review segmental
information from the “eyes of management”, as opposed to a “risks and rewards” approach under
the old IAS 14.
In addition, the cost and time needed to produce such segmental information is greatly reduced
since most, if not all, of this information is already available within the entity, which is a distinct
advantage in the case of public companies that are required to report on a quarterly basis.
• That engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses
Whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the entity’s chief operating decision maker
to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance
For which discrete financial information is available.
Segmental reports are designed to reveal significant information that might otherwise be hidden
by the process of presenting a single statement of comprehensive income / income statement
and statement of financial position for the entity.
C. REPORTABLE SEGMENTS
An entity should report financial and descriptive information about its reportable segments. Not
all operating segments would automatically qualify as reportable segments. IFRS 8 requires
segmental information to reflect the way that the entity is actually managed. The operating
segments are those that are used in its internal management reports. Consequently, management
identifies the operating segments.
The standard prescribes the criteria for an operating segment to qualify as a reportable segment
and must separately report information about an operating segment that meets any of the
following thresholds (the “alternative quantitative thresholds”):
• Its reported revenue, from both external customers and intersegment sales or transfers, is 10%
or more of the combined revenue (internal and external) of all operating segments; OR
• The absolute measure of its reported profit or loss is 10% or more of the greater, in absolute
amount, of
• The combined reported profit of all operating segments that did not report a loss and
• The combined reported loss of all operating segments that reported a loss; OR
• Its assets are 10% or more of the combined assets of all operating segments.
Furthermore, if the total revenue attributable to all operating segments (as identified by applying
the alternative quantitative thresholds criteria, above) constitutes less than 75% of the entity’s
total revenue as per its financial statements, the entity should look for additional operating
segments until it is satisfied that at least 75% of the entity’s revenue is captured through such
segmental reporting.
In identifying the additional operating segments as reportable segments (for the purposes of
meeting the 75% threshold); the Standard has relaxed its requirements of meeting the “alternative
quantitative thresholds” criteria. In other words, an entity has to keep identifying more segments
even if they do not meet the “alternative quantitative thresholds” test until at least 75% of the
entity’s revenue is included in reportable segments.
There is no precise limit to the number of segments that can be disclosed, but if there is more
than ten, the resulting information may become too detailed. Information about other business
activities and operating segments that are not reportable are combined into “all other segments”
category.
EXAMPLE
FG carries out a number of different business activities. The summarised information regarding
these activities
is below:
On the face of it, it appears that the development of software is a third segment. It would make
intuitive sense for both parts of this operation to be reported together, as supply to users of other
hardware forms only 3% of total revenue and 6% of total profit before tax.
Although, technical support and training falls below all three 10% thresholds, it should be
disclosed as a fourth reportable segment because it has different characteristics from the rest of
the business.
• General information about how the entity identified its operating segments and the types of
products and services from which each operating segment derives its revenues.
• Information about the reported segment profit or loss, including certain specified revenues and
expenses included in segment profit or loss, segment assets and segment liabilities and the
basis of measurement; and
• Reconciliations of the totals of segment revenues, reported segment profit or loss, segment
assets, segment liabilities and other material items to corresponding items in the entity’s
financial statements.
IFRS 8 also expands considerably the disclosure of segment information at interim reporting
dates.
Common costs may be allocated to different segments on whatever basis the director is
reasonable. This can lead to the arbitrary allocation of these costs.
A segment’s operating results can be distorted by trading with other segments on non-commercial
terms.
These limitations have applied to most systems of segmental reporting, regardless of the
accounting standard being applied. IFRS 8 requires disclosure of some information about the
way in which common costs are allocated and the basis for inter-segment transactions.
EXAMPLE
EPN is a listed entity. You are the financial controller of the entity and its consolidated financial
statements for
the year ended 31 March 2010 are being prepared. The board of directors is responsible for all
key financial and operating decisions, including the allocation of resources. Your assistant is
preparing the first draft of the statements. He has a reasonable general accounting knowledge
but is not familiar with the detailed requirements of all relevant financial reporting standards. He
has sent you a note as shown below:
“We intend to apply IFRS 8 – Operating Segments – in this year’s financial statements. I am
aware that this standard has attracted a reasonable amount of critical comment since it was
issued in November 2006. The board of directors receives a monthly report on the activities of
the five significant operational areas of our business. Relevant financial information relating to
the five operations for the year to 31 March 2010, and in respect of our Head Office, is as follows:
SOLUTION
Following your recent memorandum here is a response to the queries you raised:
IFRS 8 – Operating Segments – states that an operating segment is a component of our business:
• That engages in activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses; Whose
operating results are regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker (CODM).
For which discrete financial information is available.
The term ‘CODM’ identifies a function, and not necessarily a manager with a specific title. The
key function is allocation of resources and assessment of performance. The CODM can be an
individual or a group of directors. In our case the board of directors is the CODM.
Once an operating segment is identified it is necessary to report separate information about the
segment if it exceeds any one of three quantitative thresholds:
Its reported revenue is 10% or more of the combined revenue of all operating segments.
The absolute amount of its reported profit or loss is 10% or more of the greater, in absolute
amount, of
• The combined reported profit of all operating segments that did not report a loss; and
• The combined reported loss of all operating segments that reported a loss.
Where two or more segments exhibit similar long term financial performance it is necessary to
aggregate them for the purposes of the size tests.
Segments A and B are separately reportable because in each case their revenue is more than
10% of the total revenue of the business. There is no need for any further consideration.
Segment C is reportable despite its revenue being less than 10% of the total revenue. Its assets
are more than
10% of the total of the assets of all operating segments. There is no need for any further
consideration.
Segments D and E are considered as a single segment. They fail both the revenue and the
assets tests but their profit (150 + 450 = 600) is more than 10% of the total profit of the segments
that report a profit (3,000 + 2,000
+ 600 = 5,600).Therefore the segments are reportable together as a single segment.
The reasons the standard has attracted such critical comment are:
• The identification of operating segments, and the segment information that is provided, is based
around the internal business organisation. Therefore the reports are potentially vulnerable to
management discretion in terms of what is reported and intercompany comparison may be
difficult or even impossible.
• The standard was issued as a part of the convergence project with the US FASB and is based
very much on the equivalent US standard. Some commentators are concerned that the reason
for the issue of the standard was based on pragmatism, rather than on sound theoretical
principles.
• The standard does not require entities to follow the measurement principles of IFRS in its
segment reports, but rather the measurement principles that are used internally.
A. OBJECTIVE
The objective of IFRS 5 is to outline:
• Accounting for assets classified as “Held-For-Sale”; and
• The presentation and disclosure of “Discontinued Operations”
IFRS 5 requires non-current assets and groups of assets (disposal groups”...see below) that are
‘Held-For-Sale’ to be presented separately on the face of the Statement of Financial Position
and the results of ‘Discontinued Operations’ to be presented separately in the Statement of
Comprehensive Income.
• The asset must be marketed at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value
• The sale should be expected to be completed within a twelve month period from the date of
classification
• It is unlikely that significant change to the plan will take place or that the asset will be
withdrawn from its availability for sale.
If the asset is not sold within the 12 month stipulated period, it can still be classified as held for
sale as long as any delay is beyond the control of the board and they are still committed to sell.
If the criteria for ‘Held-For-Sale’ are no longer met, the entity must cease to classify the assets
or disposal group as ‘held-For-Sale’. The assets or the disposal group must be measured at the
lower of:
• Its carrying amount before it was classified as held for sale adjusted for the depreciation that
would be charged if it were never classed as held for sale
• Its recoverable amount at the date of the decision not to sell
Any adjustment to the value should be shown in income from continuing operations for the
period.
If the assets are to be abandoned or gradually wound down, then they cannot be classified as
‘Held-For-Sale’ since their carrying amounts will not be recovered principally through a sale
transaction. They might, however, qualify as discontinued operations once they have been
abandoned.
An impairment loss should be recognised when the carrying value is greater than the fair value
less sales costs. When a disposal group is being written down to fair value less costs to sell, the
impairment loss reduces the
carrying amount of assets in the order outlined by IAS 36 Impairment of assets That is, write
down goodwill
first and then allocate the remaining loss to the assets on a pro-rata basis (based on their
carrying amount). Non-current assets held for sale should not be depreciated, even if they are
still being used by the entity.
Where a non-current asset has previously been revalued and is now classified as being ‘Held-
for-Sale’, it should be revalued to fair value immediately before it is classified as ‘Held-For-Sale’.
It is then revalued again at the lower of the carrying amount and the fair value less costs to sell.
The difference is the selling costs and these should be charged against the profits for the period.
The major classes of assets and liabilities classified as ‘Held-For-Sale’ must be separately
disclosed either on the face of the statement of financial position or in the notes.
If the criteria for classification of an asset as ‘Held-For-Sale’ occur after the year end, the non-
current asset should not be shown as ‘Held-For-Sale’. However, certain relevant information
should be disclosed about the asset in question. This is a non-adjusting event after the reporting
date.
A non-current asset that has been temporarily taken out of use or service cannot be classified
as being abandoned.
Example 1
On 1st January 2007, CX Ltd. acquired a building for US $600,000. The building had an expected
useful life of
50 years. On 31st December 2010, CX Ltd. put the building up for sale. The criteria necessary
for classification as “Held-For-Sale” are deemed to be met.
On 31st December 2010, the building has an estimated market value of US$660,000 and selling
costs of
US$45,000 will be payable on disposal (including aUS $15,000 tax charge).
SOLUTION
Until 31st December 2010, the normal rules of IAS 16 apply. The carrying value of the building
is US$552,000 (US$600,000 – (12,000 x 3)). At this date, the building is reclassified as a non-
current asset held for sale. It is measured at the lower of:
• Carrying Amount of US$552,000
• Fair Value Less costs to sell US$630,000
The building will therefore be measured at US $552,000 at 31st December 2010. (Note that any
applicable tax expense is excluded from the calculation of ‘costs to sell’).
Example 2
FL Ltd. has an asset that has been designated as ‘Held-For-Sale’ in the financial year to 31st
December 2010. During the financial year to 31st December 2011, the asset remains unsold.
The market conditions have deteriorated significantly, but the directors of Filo believe that the
market will improve and have therefore not reduced the price of the asset, which continues to be
classified as held for sale.
The fair value of the asset is US$15 million and the asset is being marketed atUS $21 million.
Should the asset be classified as ‘Held-For-Sale’ in the financial statements for the year
ending 31st
December 2011?
SOLUTION
Because the price is in excess of the current fair value, this means that the asset is not available
for immediate sale. Consequently, it should not be classified as held for sale.
If the operation has not already been sold, then it will only be a discontinued operation if it is held
for sale.
The entity should disclose a single amount on the face of the statement of comprehensive
income comprising the total of:-
The above-mentioned single amount must be analysed, either in the notes or on the face of the
Statement of Comprehensive Income, into:
The entity should disclose the net cash flows attributable to the operating, investing and financing
activities of discontinued operations. These disclosures may be presented either on the face of
the cash flow statement or in the notes.
If the decision to sell an operation is taken after the year end, but before the financial statements
are authorised, this is treated as a non-adjusting event after the reporting date and is disclosed
in the notes. The operation does not qualify as a discontinued operation at the reporting date and
separate presentation is not appropriate.
In addition, the net assets of the division were sold off at a profit of RWF7,300,000. The tax
attributable to this profit is RWF2,300,000
Show the extract from the Statement of Comprehensive Income in relation to the discontinued
operation
Solution
First, make sure the figures have not been included as part of other figures.
For example, if the sales have been included in the sales from all divisions for the year, sales
from the software division must be deducted from total sales to avoid double-counting
Definitions
• A Branch is a unit of a business enterprise located some distance from the Home Office (HO).
The merchandise of a Branch may be obtained exclusively from the HO, or a portion may be
purchased from outside suppliers. A Branch generally caries a stock of merchandise obtained
from the home office, makes sales, approves customers’ credit, and makes collections on
Trade A/cs receivable.
• Certain units or segments of a business enterprise may be operated as divisions. A division
may consist of either a series of Branches or one or more corporations. When a segment is
operated as a corporation, it is known as a subsidiary of the parent company.
• Branch accounting is an accounting system in which separate accounts are maintained for
each Branch of a corporate entity. The primary objectives of Branch accounting are better
accountability and control, since profitability and efficiency can be closely tracked at the
Branch level.
• Branch accounts are accounts relating to different Branches and are used to ascertain the
trading result of each Branch separately.
• Branches are separated from the main organization while Departments are attached with the
main organization under a single roof.
• Branches are the outcome of tough competition and expansion of business. Departments are
the result of fast human life.
• Branches are geographically separated. Departments are not separated rather existed under
a same roof.
• Home/Domestic Branch
Remittance of Cash Independent Branches are All the daily cash sale and
not required to remit all the collection from debtors will
cash daily to Head Office. be deposited at local bank or
remitted to H.O
Trial Balance A trial balance has been Trial Balance is not required to
extracted from the ledger be extracted as accounts are
maintained at branch level. maintained at Head Office.
• Debtors system
• Stock and debtors system
• Final account system (Income statement system)
xx xx
Note: To ascertain any missing figure relating to cash remitted, stock and/or debtors, a
memorandum Branch cash account, Branch stock account and Branch debtors account has to
be prepared.
(1) Petty cash expenses: No entry is made in respect of petty cash expenses incurred by the Branch and
paid out of its petty cash. The Branch Account is debited with the opening balance of petty cash as
to bank account and the amount of petty cash sent by head office, and it is credited with the closing
balance of petty cash. This amounts to a net debit to Branch Account which is equal to the amount of
petty expenses incurred by Branch. If petty cash is maintained on the imprest system, actual expenses
incurred will be reimbursed and appear on the debit side of Branch A/c.
(2) Credit sales, sales return, bad debts, discount allowed to debtors: All these items relate to Branch
debtors and will not be shown in the Branch Account. The reasoning is similar to that of petty cash
expenses. When the Branch Account is debited with the opening balance of Branch debtors and
credited with cash received from debtors and the closing balance of Branch debtors, the amount of
credit sales etc. automatically stand accounted for.
(3) Shortage or surplus of stock: It is possible that, at the time of checking the stock of a Branch, certain
amount of shortage or surplus is detected. These are not to be shown in the Branch Account because
the closing stock credited to the Branch Account is the actual amount of stock and thus the shortage
or surplus is automatically covered.
(5) Purchase of non-current assets by the Branch: The non-current assets purchased by the Branch should
be treated as closing Branch non-current asset and should be credited to the Branch account. If it is
purchased for cash, it should also be deducted from the remittance on the credit side of the Branch
account. If it is purchased on credit, it should also be treated as a closing Branch liability and appear
on the debit side of Branch account.
(6) Sale of non-current assets: The effect of this is to reduce the value of Branch assets at close and
increase the remittance from the Branch in case the sale is for cash. If the sale is for credit it will
increase the debtors balance instead of increase in remittance.
(7) Amount received from insurance company: in case insurance company admits a claim in respect of
stock or any other property damaged at the Branch, the amount received by the Branch from insurance
company will be remitted to the Head Office. In case the claim admitted is outstanding till the date of
the closing of the accounting period, the amount will be shown as an asset at the Branch on the credit
side of the Branch account.
2) For adjustment of loading (to remove loading) in goods sent to Branch less returns
1. Branch stock account is the most important account which helps the Head Office to have an effective
control over the Branch stock. While preparing the Branch Stock Account, you will show the actual
stock with Branch as the balance in this account, and then if the totals of both sides do not tally, you
will show the difference as shortage or surplus as the case may be. If it is found that the actual stock
with the Branch is less than the balance shown by the Branch Stock Account, it means that there is a
‘shortage’ in the stock with the Branch. Similarly, if the actual stock with the Branch is more than the
balance shown by the Branch Stock Account, it would reflect ‘surplus’.
2. Goods sent to Branch account: This account is prepared to ascertain the net value of goods sent to the
Branch. Goods sent to the Branch, goods returned by the Branch, and loading included in them are
recorded in this account.
3. Branch debtors account is maintained to keep a record of all transactions relating to the Branch debtors
and ascertaining the balance of the debtors at the end of the accounting period.
4. Branch adjustment account, like a Trading A/c of the Branch, it is prepared to ascertain the gross profit
or gross loss made at the Branch. All shortage/surplus of stock and loading in the goods sent to the
Branch, in opening and closing stocks at the Branch, etc. are recorded in this account.
5. Profit and loss account is prepared to ascertain the net profit/loss made at the Branch. The gross profit
or loss from the Branch Adjustment Account is transferred to this account. It is debited with Branch
expenses as per the Branch Expenses Account and the loss on account of shortage being the cost of
such shortage. In case the Branch Stock Account reveals some surplus, the amount equal to the cost
of such surplus will be shown on the credit side of the Branch Profit & Loss A/c
6. Branch cash account is maintained to record all cash transactions of the Branch. It is particularly
helpful in those cases where a Branch is not required to remit immediately all collections of cash made
by it but use it for Branch expenses and remit the balance to the HO at regular intervals. Normally, a
dependent Branch is not allowed the freedom to retain cash collections. However, this account helps
the head office to keep control over Branch cash.
7. Branch non-current assets accounts: a separate account for each of the Branch non-current assets is
maintained to record all transactions relating to each of these non-current assets. The depreciation on
Branch non-current assets however, is debited to Branch Expenses A/c and credited to the respective
account.
9. Branch stock reserve account is contra to branch stock account. In this account opening and closing
balance of loading on branch stock is maintained.
(2) For goods returned by the Branch to Head Office (at invoice price)
• Dr Goods sent to X Branch A/c (as if the Branch has first returned goods to the Head Office)
Cr Goods sent to Y Branch A/c (and then the Head Office has sent goods to another
Branch)
(4) For cash sales made by the Branch (at invoice price)
• Dr Branch cash/bank A/c
• Cr Branch stock A/c
(5) For credit sales made by the Branch (at invoice price)
(7) For cash received from debtors and remitted to Head Office
(9) For goods returned by Branch debtors directly to the Head Office (at invoice price)
No entry is required for a normal loss of stock. The branch stock balance (net) is shown as
found by physical verification. If insured, any amount received from insurance company for
abnormal loss of stock will be recorded as follows:
(18) For transfer of gross profit shown by the Branch adjustment A/c (to close)
(19) For transfer of gross loss shown by the Branch adjustment A/c (to close)
(20) For transfer of Net Profit at the Branch to General Profit & Loss A/c
(20) For transfer of Net Loss at the Branch to General Profit & Loss A/c
• Dr General Profit and loss A/c
• Cr Branch Profit and loss A/c
Sale of goods by the Branch at a price higher or lower than the invoice price
A Branch may be allowed to sell goods at a price higher than the invoice price. Since the Branch
stock account is prepared at invoice price, in case of stock and debtors system, an adjustment
entry will be required for the excess price charged by Branch in order to ascertain the closing
Similarly, if a Branch is compelled to sell goods at a price lower than invoice price on account
of goods being spoiled or their being a defective in nature, an adjustment entry on the above
pattern will also be required. The entry will be as follows:
Or
• Dr Goods in transit A/c
• Cr Branch A/c
OR
• Dr Goods in transit A/c
• Cr Branch stock A/c
Note: * The goods in transit should be added up with the closing stock figure of the Head Office for
the purpose of Trading and Profit and Loss A/c in case this entry is passed instead of alternative
entry.
Note: The goods in transit and Cash in transit will appear as assets in the balance sheet of the
H.O.
The only reason for preparing the statement is to have full information of all transactions which
are ignored in Debtor System (already discussed in the previous section).
We know very well that in the ‘Income Statement’ incomes and expenses are measured on the
basis of accrual concept and the profits are measured according to the matching concept. So
the cost of goods sold will be determined keeping in view that the goods sent to Branch are
equivalent to purchases of Branch and should be included at cost. Obviously the opening and
closing stocks cannot be measured at a value that is above its cost. So, we will consider both
situations at cost price and at invoice price.
For example the cost price of an article is $100, the wholesale price, $160 and the retail selling
price, $180. Under retail profit basis, where an article is sold by the Branch at retail price/list
price, the actual profit is $180 – $100 = $80 but if it is sold under wholesale basis, the amount of
profit will be $60 (i.e $160-$100, therefore the Branch’s real profit is $180 – $160 = $20.
In wholesale price system, the real cost of the Branch is the wholesale price of the goods sent.
But, we must remember that wholesale prices are fixed above cost. For this purpose, Branch
Stock Account or the Trading Account is debited with:
The value of goods lost due to accident, theft etc. also is credited to the Branch Stock Account
or Trading Account calculated at the wholesale price. At this stage, the Branch Stock or Trading
Account will reveal the amount of gross profit (or loss). It is transferred to the Branch Profit and
Loss Account. On further being debited with the expenses incurred at the branch (including any
allowance that may have been made in favour of a customer after sales being recorded) and the
wholesale price of goods lost, the Branch Profit and Loss Account will disclose the net profit (or
loss) at the branch.
Note: Closing stock of branch includes goods directly purchased from suppliers will not be
concerned in the calculation of the provision of unrealized profit
In the Balance sheet, Branch stock is shown at cost i.e. after deducting stock reserve. At the
beginning of the next year, a reserve entry is passed for this profit will be realized.
Shishoza Tsindaneza
$ $
Opening stock at cost 100,000 56,000
The following trial balance was extracted from the books of Joyce Ltd:
Tsindaneza 72,800
Branch adjustment Account: 20,000
Shishoza
Tsindaneza 16,800
6,606,900 6,606,900
Additional information:
Solution
Joyce Ltd
Trading and Profit and Loss Account for the year ended 31 December 2017
$ $
Sales 3,463,200
Opening Stock
250,000
Add: Purchases 3,800,000
Less: Goods sent to Branch 1,126,000
($725,200+$400,800) 2,924,000
HO 180,000
Shishoza 91,680
Tsindaneza 117,000
• In H.O books: Branch Current A/c is opened to record transactions between the H.O and
Branch;
• In Branch books: H.O Current A/c is opened to record transactions between the Branch and
H.O.
Accounting entries:
In all these cases, a reconciliation of the balance of Head Office A/c appearing in the books
of Branch with the balance of Branch A/c appearing in the books of Head Office is needed.
Accounting entry for reconciliation will be passed in the books of either party as follows:
20 Adjustments
Besides reconciliation entries, adjustments entries may have to be passed at the end of the
accounting year for certain transactions between the Head Office and the Branch. These include:
(b) Depreciation on branch non-current asset, accounts maintained by the Head Office
Sometimes accounts of non-current assets at Branch are maintained by the Head Office. The
following entries will, therefore, be required for depreciation on such noncurrent assets:
In the books of the Head Office:
Branch A/c
To Branch non-current asset A/c
In the books of the Branch:
Depreciation A/c
To Head Office A/c
• Detailed incorporation
• Abridged incorporation
(1) For incorporating items which are shown on the debit side of the Trading Account:
218 I1.2 FINANCIAL REPORTING CPA EXAMINATION
STUDY MANUAL
Dr Branch Trading A/c
Cr Branch A/c
(with total amount of expenses which are debited to Trading Account: opening stock, purchases,
return inwards, wages and other manufacturing expenses, etc.)
(2) For incorporating items shown on the credit side of the Trading Account:
Dr Branch A/c
Cr Branch Trading A/c
(with total amount of revenues which are credited to Trading Account: sales, closing stock and
return outwards and other items that appear in the credit side)
(6) For transferring the net loss as shown by the Branch A/c:
Dr General P&L A/c (H.O P&L A/c)
Cr Branch P&L A/c
Note: as a result of these incorporation entries, the Branch Account in the Head Office books will
be completely closed. In other words, after passing the accounting entries for incorporation, the
Branch Account appearing in the Trial balance of Head Office will give Nil Balance.
It should be noted that in case entries are passed only for transfer of items relating to Trading
and Profit & Loss Account or for incorporating only the balance as shown by the Branch Profit
and Loss Account (and not for incorporation of Branch Assets and Liabilities), the balance in the
Branch A/c at any time will show the Net assets. In other words, Branch Assets and Liabilities
will not appear in Branch A/c and this account will show a balance which must be equal to the
difference between assets and liabilities, i.e., in other words, net worth of the business.
Entries in the books of the Branch
The Branch books have also to be closed at the end of the accounting period. The entry for
closing the books of the Branch may also be passed according to any of the two methods
discussed above.
(b) For transfer of items appearing on the credit side of the Branch Trading and P&L A/c
Dr Sales A/c
Dr Closing stock A/c (actual amount)
Dr Discount received A/c
Dr Interest received A/c
Cr Head Office A/c
Example: The Head Office of a business and is Branch keep their own books and each prepares
its own Profit and Loss account. The following are the balances appearing on the two sets of the
books as on 31st Dec. 2015 after calculating profits and after making adjustments except those
referred to below:
(a) On 31st December 2015, the Branch had sent a cheque for $1,000 to the Head Office, but was not
received by them nor credited to the Branch till next month;
(b) Goods valued at $440 had been forwarded by the Head Office to the Branch and invoiced on 30th
December 2015, but were not received by the Branch nor dealt with in their books till next month;
(c) Stock stolen on the way to the branch are charged to the branch by the head office but not credited to
the head office in the branch books as the branch manager declined to admit any liability, $400 (not
covered by insurance);
(d) It was agreed that the Branch should be charged with $300 for administration services rendered by the
Head Office during the year;
(e) Depreciation of Branch assets, of which accounts are maintained by the Head Office not provided for
$250;
(f) The balance of profit shown by the Branch is to be transferred to the Head Office books.
Solution
When attempting a question on Independent Branch, we are advised to check whether the
balance as shown by the H.O A/c in branch books and the Branch A/c in the head office Books
reconcile with each other or not.
In the present question, there is a difference of $1,840. The difference is due to treatment required
for adjustments (a), (b) and (d) as mentioned in the question.
The reconciliation entries will have to be passed for these adjustments. Moreover, adjustment
entries have to be passed for other adjustments and transfer of branch profit.
Branch Journal
Particulars $ $
The balance in the Branch A/c represents the net assets at Branch. This can be verified as
follows:
Dr Cr
Brach noncurrent assets 16,000
Branch stock 10,740
Branch debtors 4,840
Branch cash 1,420
To Branch A/c 33,000
(Incorporation of Branch assets in the H.O
books)
Branch A/c 1,920
To Branch creditors A/c 1,920
Incorporation of Branch liabilities in the H.O
books)
1. (a) Noncurrent assets at the exchange rate ruling when the assets were bought – temporal method.
If fixed assets have been bought on different dates, then different rates will have to be used for each
separate purchase.
(b) Depreciation on the Noncurrent assets - at the same rate as the fixed assets concerned.
2. Current assets and current liabilities – at the rate ruling at the trial balance date. This is known as the
closing method.
3. Opening stock in the trading account – at the rate ruling at the previous balance sheet date (op bal).
4. Goods sent by the head office to the branch, or returns from the branch – at the actual figures shown
in the Goods Sent to Branches Account in the Head Office books.
5. Trading and profit and loss account items, other than depreciation, opening and closing stocks, or
goods sent to or returned by the branch – at the average rate for the period covered by the accounts.
6. The Head Office Current Account – at the same figures as shown in the Branch Current Account in the
Head Office books.
Example: Carlin & Co. has Head Office at New York (USA) and branch at Mumbai (India). Mumbai
branch is an integral foreign operation of Carlin & Co. Mumbai branch furnishes you with its trial
balance as on 31st March, 2016 and the additional information given thereafter:
Dr Cr
(Rs. 000) (Rs. 000)
Stock on 1st April, 2015 300 –
Additional information:
(a) Computers were acquired from a remittance of US $6,000 received from New York Head Office and
paid to the suppliers. Depreciate computers at 60% for the year.
(b) Unsold stock of Mumbai branch was worth Rs. 420,000 on 31st March, 2016.
(c) The rates of exchange may be taken as follows:
Required:
Prepare in US dollars the revenue statement for the year ended 31st March, 2016 and the
balance sheet as on that date of Mumbai branch as would appear in the books of New York Head
Office of Carlin & Co. You are informed that Mumbai branch account showed a debit balance of
US $39,609.18 on 31.3.2006 in New York books and there were no items pending reconciliation.
(Rs.)
Stock on 1.4.05 40 7,500.00 –
Computers – 6,000.00 –
Bank balance 42 10,000.00 –
New York office A/c – – 39,609.18
81,734.62 81,734.62
Trading and Profit & Loss Account for the year ended 31st March, 2016
US $ US $
To Opening Stock 7,500.00 By Sales 29,268.29
To Purchases 19,512.20 By Closing stock 10,000.00
To Wages and salaries 13,658.54 By Gross Loss c/d 1,402.45
40,670.74 40,670.74
To Gross Loss b/d 1,402.45 By Net Loss 17,685.38
To Rent, rates and taxes 8,780.49
To Sundry charges 3,902.44
ASSETS US $ LIABILITIES US $
CONSIGNMENT ACCOUNTS
Nature and features of a consignment
In some cases, the manufacturers or wholesalers deliver goods but retain title to the goods
until they are sold. This specialised method of marketing certain types of products makes use
of a device known as a consignment. Consignment is a fairly common commercial transaction,
perhaps more common than many people may think. A typical example is that of a manufacturer
who supplies stock of a new product on consignment to a local distributor.
Consignment is defined as an arrangement whereby goods owned by one party called consignor
are sold by another party called consignee on a commission basis. The consignor is the principal
while the consignee is the agent.
It is important to understand this agency relationship. The ownership of the goods does not
transfer to the consignee. The consignee is entitles to a commission for selling the goods; the
expenses may be incurred by both parties; and periodically or on completion of the consignment,
settlement is effected between the parties. If any goods remain unsold then they are generally
returned to the consignor.
1. Objects: Goods are forwarded by the consignor to the consignee with an objective of sale at a profit.
2. Ownership: In consignment, the consignee does not buy the goods. He merely undertakes to sell them
on behalf of the consignor. Hence, the ownership in the goods remains with consignor till it is sold by
the consignee.
3. Relationship: The relationship between the consignor and the consignee is that of a principal and an
agent, and not of a debtor and creditor. An agent becomes in debited for amounts realized on behalf
of the principal.
4. Risk: the consignor should bear all the risks connected with the goods until they are sold.
5. Expenses: as consignment is not a sale, whatever the consignee does is on behalf of the consignor.
Thus, the consignor should reimburse all legitimate expenses incurred by the consignee for selling and
receiving the goods.
6. Stock of goods: Any stock remaining unsold with the consignee belongs to the consignor.
7. Commission: the consignee agrees to sell the goods for an agreed rate of commission. He or she is
therefore, allowed to deduct his commission due from the sale proceeds.
1. In sale the property in goods is transferred to the buyer immediately whereas in consignment the
property is transferred to the buyer only when goods are sold by the consignee. The ownership of
goods remains with the consignor when goods are transferred to the consignee by the consignor.
2. In sale, the risk attached to the goods passes with ownership to the buyer. In case of a consignment,
the risk attaching to the goods does not pass to the consignee who acts as an agent. If there is any
damage or loss to the goods it is borne by consignor provided the consignee has taken reasonable
care of the goods and the damage or loss is not due to his negligence.
3. The relationship of consignor and consignee is that of a principal and an agent as in a contract of
agency whereas the relationship of buyer and seller is governed by the Sale of Goods Act.
4. Unsold goods on consignment are the property of the consignor and may be returned if not saleable in
the market whereas goods sold on sale basis are normally not returnable unless there is some defect
in them.
• When the agent is required to put in hard work in introducing a new product in the market.
• Where he is entrusted with the work of supervising the performance of other agents in a
particular area.
• For effecting sales at prices higher than the price fixed by the consignor.
Advance against consignment: Until the goods are sold by the consignee, he is not indebted to
PRO-FORMA INVOICE
E. & O.E.
Rajkot
Date: 11/2/2011 Navin Barcha
Sales Manager
Gujarat Zone
Total: $139
Account Sales: This is a summary of the transactions of the consignee. It is a means of conveying
information to the consignor and shows the gross proceeds of sale of the goods, expenses
incurred by the consignee, commission due and the net amount owing to the consignor.
All expenses and commission are deducted All expenses incurred by the consignee are
in account sales borne by the consignor
The relationship between two parties The relationship between two parties is that of
remains as principal and agent debtor and creditor
Account Sales as received from ... of ... for the sales made on consignment for the period from
... to ...
NOTES:
Other receipts: Amount to be paid by consignee may include the amounts received on account
of sale of abnormal loss stocks, insurance realisations and sale of salvaged stock. These
realisations would not form revenue for consignment business. Hence, they cannot be included
in the normal sale proceeds. But since the consignee has to account for these realisations also
he includes them in the account sales.
Bad debts: If the consignee has to bear the bad debt loss (del credere commission) such a
deduction cannot be made since the amount is to be given by the consignee and he cannot
reduce the amounts due saying someone did not pay up.
Balance due from consignment debtors: The amount due to be received by the consignor would
be the amount left over after setting off the advances, commissions, expenses to be reimbursed,
from the total receipts. The total receipts includes both cash receipts as well as collections in
relation to credit sales. This implies that the Net amount due to be sent to the consignor may not
be available with the consignee in cash.
CPA EXAMINATION I1.2 FINANCIAL REPORTING 233
STUDY MANUAL
Consignee collects his dues first: If you notice the working in the account sales, you will be able
to ascertain that the consignee is paying cash to the consignor only after he has collected it from
the consignment debtors. From the initial sale proceeds he would be recovering the advances
he paid, the expenses he paid, the commission due to him (on all sales). If there is any amount
remaining after this, and that too if it is not locked up in consignment debtors only he would be
paying the consignor.
$ $
35 case of fancy goods at $150 per case 5,250
40 cases of fancy goods at $200 per case 8,000 13,250
• To ascertain the results (profit/loss) of consignment and incorporate them in his P&L Account.
• To make final settlement with the consignee.
The consignor and the consignee keep their own books of accounts. The consignor may send
goods to many consignees. Also, a consignee may act as agent for many consignors. Therefore, it
is appropriate that a separate consignment account as well as consignee account be prepared in
respect of every consignment to enable both of them to know profit or loss on each consignment.
20 Expenses on consignment
(a) Non-recurring expenses
Non-recurring expenses are the expenses which do not arise repeatedly for a particular
consignment. They are incurred for bringing goods to the warehouse of the consignee. Such
expenses are generally incurred on the consignment as a whole, partly by the consignor and
partly by the consignee. The consignor usually incurs expenses, such as packing, cartage,
loading charges, freight, etc., on sending the goods to the consignee. But the consignee usually
incurs expenses, such as customs duty, clearing charges, etc., on receiving the goods from the
consignor.
Loss on the consignment is transferred to the P&L A/c Dr Profit and loss
Cr Consignment
For closing stock on consignment Dr Consignment stock a/c
Cr Consignment a/c
For closing goods sent for consignment sale account Dr Goods sent on
consignment
To Trading a/c
Note: The discount on bills may be accounted for in one of two ways:
• As a normal operating expenses item and charged against the profit and loss account; or
• As a special expense item related to the consignment and therefore charged to consignment
a/c.
Consignment A/c
Dr Consignor
Payment to the consignor by cheque or bill Cr Bank/Bill payable
Example 1:
Wills of London, whose financial year ends on 31 December, consigned goods to Adams, his
agent in Canada. All transactions were started and completed in 19X8.
The double entry accounts in the books of the consignee (Adams) are as follows:
1. Opening stock: It is always shown on debit side of consignment account. The difference
between invoice price and cost price of the stock will be shown on credit side of consignment
account:
Stock reserve A/c…………………….Dr
To Consignment A /c………………………….Cr
2. Goods sent on consignment: Such goods are shown on the debit side of the consignment
account at invoice price. The difference between invoice price and cost price of goods sent on
consignment will be shown on the credit side of the consignment account:
Goods sent on consignment…………Dr
To Consignment A /c…………………………Cr
3. Goods returned by the consignee: The return of goods is shown on credit side of the consignment
account. The adjustment for loading will be made on the debit side of consignment account:
Consignment A /c……………………Dr
To Goods sent on consignment…….………..Cr
4. Closing stock (unsold stock): it is shown on the credit side of consignment account. Hence, the
adjustment for the loading will be made on the debit side of consignment account:
Consignment A /c…………………………………..Dr
To Stock reserve A/c Stock Suspense A/c ………………………… Cr
In practice, the loading done at a fixed percentage of profit on cost, bears a fixed relation with the
profit on invoice price of the goods.
Journal (amounts in $)
Consignment to Malik account 16,000
To Goods sent on consignment account 16,000
(100 machines at $160 each sent on consignment, at invoice
price)
Consignment to Malik account 400
To Cash account 400
(Expenses incurred on consignment)
Bills receivable account 8,000
To Malik 8,000
(Malik’s acceptance received)
Malik 14,000
To Consignment to Malik account 14,000
(80 machines sold by Malik at $175 each)
Consignment to Malik account 750
To Malik 750
(Expenses incurred by Malik)
Consignment to Malik account 1,050
To Malik 1,050
The basis for valuation of this stock is cost price unless deterioration or obsolescence requires
the adoption of net realizable value.
• Determination of cost price involves a consideration not only of the original purchase price of
the goods but also all direct expense or all expenses made whether by the consignor or by the
consignee in placing the goods in a saleable condition (till the goods reach the warehouse of
the consignee such as carriage and freight, loading charges, customs duty, clearing charges,
carriage paid up to warehouse and unloading charges).
Thus it is proper to include the following in valuing unsold stock:
Take Purchase price
Add Proportion of the total relevant expenses of the whole consignment:
At the commencement of next financial period, consignment stock is transferred to the consignment
account, as a debit to enable the profit/loss on sale of the remainder of consignment to be
determined as follows:
Consignment A/c……………………Dr
Consignment Stock A/c ……………………..Cr
Note: If the pro-forma invoice was made out at a price higher than the cost, stock will also be
valued at invoice and not at cost. But it is wrong to show unsold stock in Balance Sheet at a
figure higher than the cost. Hence for the difference (i.e., difference between value of stock at
invoice price and value of stock at cost) reserve must be created, entry is as follows:
Consignment A/c ……………………..Dr
Stock Reserve A/c……………………….….. Cr
Example 2: Suppose the Consignor sends to the Consignee, 2,000 Samsung mobile at $40 per
unit and pays customs duty, $3,000; marine insurance, $1,500. The Consignee pays, at the time
of taking delivery, unloading charges of $500. The Consignee also pays storage rent $450 and
advertisement $1,500. If we assume that 400 Samsung mobile remain unsold, the value will be
calculated as follows:
Farr now wishes to balance off his consignment account at his financial year end, 31 December
19X7, ad to transfer the profit to date to his P&L A/c. The consignee account will appear as
follows:
Taking the completion of the above consignment as an example, the following details were
obtained from the final account sales dated 3 March 19X8:
Losses on consignment
In case the goods sent on consignment are lost or damaged in transit or otherwise, the loss is
that of the consignor and not of the consignee. Accordingly the consignor will have to make the
entries for such loss. There are two types of losses which may arise in case of a consignment
transaction: normal loss and abnormal loss.
Normal loss
Normal loss is natural, unavoidable and inherent in the nature of goods or commodities sent
on consignment (due to evaporation, leakage & breaking the bulk into pieces). This type of
loss is a part of the cost of consignment, so the consignor does not make separate entry for
such a loss. However, the normal loss has to be taken into consideration while valuating unsold
consignment stock in the hand of the consignee. Since normal loss is a charge against gross
profit. No additional adjustment is required for this purpose. Moreover, the same is a part of cost
of goods, when valuation unsold stock is made in case of consignment account the quantity of
such loss (not the amount) should be deducted from the total quantity of the goods received by
the consignee in good condition.
Accounting treatment of normal loss is to charge the total cost of the goods to the remaining goods
after the normal loss. In other words, the value of the unsold stock is calculated in proportion to
the total cost of the goods consigned.
OR
Example: From the following particulars ascertain the value of unsold stock on consignment.
$
Goods sent (1,000 kgs) 20,000
Consignor’s expenses 4,000
Consignee’s non-recurring expenses 3,000
Sold (800 kgs) 40,000
Loss due to natural wastage (100
kgs)
(iv) For the balance (i.e. which is not covered/ admitted by Insurance Co.):
Dr Profit & Loss A/c
Cr Abnormal Loss A/c
Summary of the procedure for calculating the abnormal loss and valuation of the remaining
stock:
(i) Calculation of abnormal loss:
XX
Where
Example: Aju smart of Jaffna dispatched 1,000 shirts at $700 each to Mohan Bros of Colombo,
the consignors paid freight $7,500, cartage $500 and insurance $2,500. Mohan Bros received
only 900 shirts and incurred the following expenses.
The consignee sold 600 shirts only. You are required to calculate the value of closing stock.
Solution
Calculation of the value of unsold stock
1. Take the total cost of goods consigned and add all the non-recurring expenses (incurred by the
consignor and consignee).
2. Deduct the quantity and cost of abnormal loss from the total number of goods consigned and the
cost as obtained in (1) above, respectively.
3. Deduct the quantity of normal loss from the quantity worked out in (2) above without making any
adjustment in cost.
4. Calculate cost per unit of goods units by dividing the cost (remaining after deducting the cost of
abnormal loss) by the number of goods units.
FRw FRw
Opening Stock N Sales N
Add Purchases N
Less Goods on Consignment (C)
Less Closing stock (N)
Cost of goods sold N
Gross profit N
N N
Expenses N Gross profit N
Stock Loss of Consignment C Consignment profit C
Net profit T
T T
N=figure from Normal trading; C=figure from Consignment; T= Total figures
Insurance contract
As per IFRS 17, insurance contract is a “contract under which one party (insurer) accepts significant
insurance risk from another party (policyholder) by agreeing to compensate the policyholder if a
specified uncertain future event (insured event) adversely affects the policyholder.
Some contracts having the legal form of insurance may not meet that definition. Insurance
contracts transfer insurance risks (rather than only financial risks).
In other words, an insurance company (insurer) agrees, in return for a premium, to pay a sum of
money to a person or company (insured) on the happening of a certain event or to indemnify the
insured party against loss caused by risk insured against.
Insurance contract technically called ‘insurance policy’, is a written agreement between an
insurance company and a person who wants insurance which states the rules of the agreement.
An insurance policy has a lot of data. Besides the basic contact and billing information, a policy
might have premium, dividend, policy loan, agent’s commission, valuation and claims records.
Each of these records will interface with the general ledger over time. For instance, when a policy
is sold, a premium is received, a commission paid and a reserve for future claims is setup.
Insurance claim
An insurance claim is a formal request to an insurance company asking for a payment based on
the terms of the insurance policy. Insurance claims are reviewed by the company for their validity
and then paid out to the insured or requesting party (on behalf of the insured) once approved.
Every insurance claim requires some kind of proof of damage or injury before an insurer will
pay. For example: on auto claims, someone said, there are five elements of proof that will come
into play: what you tell insurance companies, what the other party tells them, a police report,
witnesses and physical damage at the scene.
1. Annuity – This is an annual payment, which a life insurance office guarantees to pay regularly as long
as one lives in consideration of a lumpsum received at the beginning. The amount of the payment
is specified by the policy, and may be constant throughout the annuity period, or may increase at a
prescribed rate. It is almost the reverse of a life policy contract. The amount payable depends upon the
age of person concerned (called an annuitant) and the prevailing rate of interest. The regular payment
(annuity) is an expense, whereas the lumpsum received at the beginning is called “consideration for
annuities granted” and is income.
2. Bonus. Bonus is the share of profit that the policyholder gets from the insurance company. Bonus in
cash: if the insurer has with profit policy, he will get the bonus from the corporation. If the bonus is
paid in cash, it is shown on debit side of the revenue account as an expense. Interim bonus will not
be shown anywhere while preparing final accounts. Instead it will be adjusted while calculating true
surplus and amount to be paid to policyholders. Bonus in reduction of premium is bonus which is
payable in cash but the policyholder has opted not to accept it in cash, and instead offset this against
premiums due from him. It is shown both on the debit side (as an expense) and credit side (by adding
to the premium) of revenue account.
4. Endowment policy is a policy, which matures on the policyholder attaining a certain age or on his death,
whichever is earlier.
5. Pensions: Pension policies involve paying regular or single premiums to create a stream of income
(starting at retirement), usually also with the option of paying a capital sum. In essence, these policies
are savings contracts, leading to a deferred annuity and a capital payment.
6. Premium: the premium received during the accounting period plus outstanding at the end of the period
plus bonus in reduction of premium minus outstanding premium at the beginning of the period minus
reinsurance premium is to be shown under this heading.
7. Premiums: A premium is a sum paid to the life office to assure the benefit specified by the policy.
8. Reinsurance: When a company accepts a business of more value and in order to reduce the risk,
may pass on some business to the other company, it is called reinsurance. The company, which
passes some business to the other company, gets a commission, which is known as commission
on reinsurance ceded (it is an income credited to Revenue A/c). The company which accepts such
business pays a commission on reinsurance accepted (it is an expense debited to Revenue A/c).
9. Retrocession. This occurs in case an insurance company reinsures one property with more than one
reinsurance company.
10. Reversionary bonus is that which is payable only on the maturity of the policy.
11. Surrender value: because many of the assurance policies are used, in part or whole, as a savings
vehicle, policyholders may wish not to continue with premium payments, so the insurer builds into the
contract a provision for its surrender for a cash sum prior to the end of the policy term. The amount
payable will generally be less than the total premiums already paid by the policyholder.
12. Whole life policy is a life policy that only matures on the death of the insured.
13. With profits policies are those policies on which, in addition to a guaranteed sum payable on maturity,
a share of the profits of the life office will be payable.
14. Without profits policies are those which entitle the policy holder to get only a fixed sum of money on
maturity.
Underwriting
Underwriting refers to the process of selecting, classifying, and pricing applicants for insurance.
The underwriter is the person who decides to accept or reject an application. An underwriter
selects certain types of risks that have historically produced a profit and rejecting those risks
that do not fit the underwriting criteria of insurer. Good underwriting of risk selection normally
produces a favourable loss ratio. This means the premium collected, less loss and expenses,
produces a profit for the insurer.
Insurers must carefully underwrite all risks to avoid being the victim of adverse selection. Adverse
selection is selection against the insurance company. It is the tendency of insureds with a greater-
than-average chance of loss to purchase insurance.
In addition, insurers will sometimes use reinsurance as a means of reducing their exposure of
loss for a particular risk. Often an insurer will cede part of a risk to a reinsurer to avoid being
exposed to a larger than usual loss.
• Ratemaking refers to the pricing of insurance and the calculation of insurance premiums. The
premium paid by insured is the result of multiplying a rate determined by actuaries by the number
of exposure units, and then adjusting by various rating plans (a process called rating).
• A rate is the price per unit of insurance. An exposure unit is the unit of measurement used in
insurance pricing, which varies by line of insurance.
Calculating the level of premium for a particular type of policy involves the expertise of a
company’s actuary. There are four main factors the actuary must consider when setting the level
of premium:
• mortality
• current and future investment income (‘interest’)
• current and future expenses
• a contingency factor
Claims settlement
Every insurance company has a claims division or department for adjusting claims. This section
of the chapter examines the basic objectives in adjusting claims, the different types of claim
adjustors, and the various steps in the claim-settlement process. From the insurer’s viewpoint,
there are several basic objectives in settling claims:
The first objective in settling claims is to verify that a covered loss has occurred . This step
involves determining whether a specific person or property is covered under the policy, and the
extent of the coverage. This objective is discussed in greater detail later in the chapter.
The second objective is the fair and prompt payment of claims. If a valid claim is denied, the
fundamental social and contractual purpose of protecting the insured is defeated. Also, the
insurer’s reputation may be harmed, and the sales of new policies may be adversely affected.
Fair payment means that the insurer should avoid excessive claim settlements and should resist
the payment of fraudulent claims, because they will ultimately result in higher premiums.
Some unfair claim practices prohibited by these laws include the following:
Reinsurance is used for several reasons. The most important reasons include the following:
• Under the pro rata method, a ceding company and reinsurer agree to share losses
and premiums based on some proportion.
• Under the excess-of-loss method, the reinsurer pays only when covered losses
exceed a certain level.
Investments
The investment function is extremely important in the overall operations of insurance
companies. Because premiums are paid in advance, they can be invested until needed to pay
claims and expenses.
INSURANCE CLAIMS
In the course of running operations, the business is exposed to a number of risks such as fire,
burglary, accidents, etc. Out of all these risks, the fire risk is the most dangerous. In case it goes
out of control, it may involve loss both in terms of property as well as human lives. A prudent
business secures itself against such losses by taking a proper insurance policy. Such policy is
usually taken for two types of losses:
• loss to the property such as stock, plant, buildings, etc. and
• loss of profits on account of dislocation of the business.
In this section, we will focus on estimating the mount of loss of stock and profits as a result of
fire.
Loss of stock
A fire insurance policy can be taken for indemnification against loss of stock on account of fire.
The policy is usually for a year. The insurance company agrees to compensate the insured for
any loss that he may suffer on account of loss of stock on account of fire, in consideration of a
certain amount being paid as premium.
When fire insurance policy for loss of stock has been taken, the business is protected from such
loss. For this purpose one has to pay a premium. This policy is usually for a year. The amount
for which a policy is taken is called the policy amount. Information about fire loss is given to the
insurance company by the insured. Insurance company sends assessors who have technical
256 I1.2 FINANCIAL REPORTING CPA EXAMINATION
STUDY MANUAL
knowledge relating to the circumstances under which fire broke out and they also determine the
amount of loss caused due to this fire. After making complete investigation, they give a report to
the insurance company mentioning therein the causes due to which fire broke out and whether
the claim is covered by the policy or not. They also mention the value of loss caused due to fire
in their report.
Opening stock
Add: Purchases (from the beginning of the accounting year to the date of fire) xx
Less: Cost of goods sold (from the beginning of the accounting year to the date of fire) xx
= Value of stock on the date of fire xx
Less: Stock of salvaged (salvaged stock) xx
= Value of stock lost on account of fire xx
The value of stock can also be ascertained by preparing a memorandum trading account as
follows:
xx xx
Note that all items debited and credited are those up to the date of fire.
The excess of the debit side over the credit side indicates value of loss of stock.
1. Sales up to the date of fire are found out and from these sales, gross profit on them is deducted.
Sales – gross profit = cost of goods sold
2. Rate of gross profit on sales is to be found out. Mostly this rate is given in the question. If this rate is
given, then
Gross profit = sales x rate/100
3. When rate of gross profit on cost is given, then the rate of gross profit on sales can easily be found.
For example, stock worth $40,000 is insured only for $30,000 and if the loss amounts to $18,000,
the claim admitted by the insurance company will be as follows:
It is to be noted that the average clause comes into play only if it is proved that loss sustained
by the insured is less than the sum insured. If the loss is more than the amount insured, then the
insurance company pays only the amount insured.
In other words,
• If the loss is more than the sum insured, the insured can recover the whole amount in spite of
the average clause.
• If the policy value is less than the value of stock on the date of fire, the entire amount of loss will
not be borne by the insurance company. The average clause will be applicable and so the loss
is borne by both the insurance company and the owner of the property.
Example: A fire occurred in the premises of Kamina ltd on 25th August, 2014 where a large part
of the stock was destroyed. Salvage was $15,000. Kamina ltd gives you the following information
for the period January 1, 2014 to 25th August, 2014:
• Purchases $85,000
• Sales $90,000
• Goods costing $5,000 were taken by A for personal use
• Cost price of the stock on January 1, 2014 was $40,000.
Over the past few years, A has been selling goods at a consistent gross profit margin of 33⅓%.
The insurance policy was for $50,000. It included an average clause
Required: Prepare a statement of claim to be made on the insurance company.
Statement of claim
$
Closing stock on 25th August, 2014 (as per Memorandum Trading 60,000
A/c)
Less: Salvage 15,000
Loss of stock 45,000
Application of average clause: $
Value of stock on hand 60,000
Amount of policy 50,000
Admissible claim (50,000*45,000)/60,000 37,500
Example: A company has decided to arrange for a loss of profit insurance. You are asked to
compute the sum for insurance from the following figures for last financial year. It is anticipated
that the current financial year turnover will increase by 10% and that all standing charges will
remain unchanged.
Solution
Amount of policy
Particulars $
Trading profit:
Sales 330,000
Less: Variable costs 231,000
Policy should be taken as 99,000
Alternatively, the amount of policy can be ascertained as follows:
Net profit as shown by Profit and loss account 45,800
Add: Increase in profit on account of increase in sales* 9,000
Fixed expenses 49,200
104,000
Less: Interest on investment (non-trading income) 5,000
Amount of policy 99,000
*i.e increase in sales less increase in variable costs = (300,000*10/100)-(210,000*10/100)
Computation of claim
Loss of profit occurs because of loss of sales on account of dislocation of the business. Moreover,
the insured may have to incur certain additional expenses to mitigate the amount of loss. There
may also be certain savings in expenses of the business because of its being closed down
for some period. All these have to be taken into consideration while calculating the amount of
insurance claim.
There are 7 steps followed in the computation of amount of claim for loss of profit:
1. Period of claim
Here the dislocation period and the indemnity period are compared. For example, if the indemnity
period is 4 months whereas the dislocation period of the business is 3 months, and then the
claim will be made for 3 months. On the contrary, if the dislocation period of business is 6 months
considering indemnity period of 4 months, the period of claim will be 4 months. The period of
claim should not go beyond indemnity period.
260 I1.2 FINANCIAL REPORTING CPA EXAMINATION
STUDY MANUAL
2. Short sales
The term short sales refers to the loss of sales on account of fire resulting in dislocation of
business. This is the difference between the standard turnover and the actual turnover during
the period of fire.
The computation of short sales requires the understanding of the following terms:
• Standard turnover. The term standard turnover refers to the turnover for the period corresponding
with the indemnity period during the preceding year adjusted in view of the trends noticed during
the accounting year in which the fire occurred.
• Indemnity period. The term indemnity period refers to the period beginning with the occurrence
of the damage, and ending not later than 12 months, thereafter during which the results of a
business shall be affected in consequence of the damage. This period is selected by the insured
himself. It is not necessary for the policy to cover the entire indemnity period. Of course, it is
essential that, on the date of fire leading to partial or complete closure of the business activity,
the police must be in force.
Example:
Fire occurs on 1st March 2018 resulting in a dislocation of the business activities for a period
of 3 months. During the same period the sales in the last year amounted to $10,000. However,
during the current year beginning with 1st January 2018, the sales were showing an increasing
trend of 10%. The actual sales during the period of dislocation amounted to $4,000. Calculate
the short sales.
Solution
All the figures related to net profit, insured standing charges, and turnover relate to the last
accounting period.
In case on net loss, the rate of gross profit will be determined as follows:
If all the standing charges are not insured, the amount of net loss will have to be reduced as
follows:
Example: Calculate from the following data the amount of permissible increased working
expenses:
The increased working expenses will be allowed only to the extent of $769. Both the claim for
loss of profit on account of short sales and increased working expenses should not exceed the
amount calculated by applying the rate of gross profit to standard sales.
Example:
6. Saving in expenses
Any saving in expenses will have to be deducted from the amount calculated as explained above.
7. Average clause
Finally, the amount calculated will be proportionally reduced if the sum insured under the policy
is less than the amount for which the policy should have been taken.
The amount for which the policy should have been taken is determined by applying the rate of
gross profit to the turnover for 12 months immediately preceding the date of fire. Such turnover
may have to be adjusted keeping in view the trend of sales in the accounting year in which the
fire occurs.
Example
Solution
$
Loss of profit due to short sales (20,000$20/100) 4,000
Increased working expenses 1,000
5,000
Less: Saving in expenses 200
Claim for loss of profit and increased working 4,800
expenses
However, the above claim will be subject to the average clause:
Amount for which the policy should have been taken: 110,000×20/100 2,000
Amount for which the policy has been taken 15,000
Amount of claim to be admitted by the insurance company = (4,800×15,000)/22,000= $3,273
Solution
Statement of claim for loss and profit
Computation of short of sales: $
Standard turnover 65,000
Add: 10% increase in turnover 6,500
71,500
Less: Sales during the dislocation period 25,000
Short sales 46,500
Gross profit on short sales @25% 11,625
Add: Increased cost of working, limited to gross profit on 1,500
$6,000
(sales resulting from increased expenses)
Less: Saving in expenses or Standing charges (4,725÷3) 13,125
Gross claim 1,575
11,550
Since the sum assured is less than the amount for which the policy should have been taken,
average clause shall apply.
Amount for which policy should have been taken: 25% of 264,000 (i.e $240,000+$24,000)=$66,000
Workings
$
1. Gross profit rate: Net profit 18,000
Add: Insured standing charges (42,000-10,000) 32,000
Gross profit 50,000
Turnover 200,000
Gross profit rate 25%
3. The amount of $13,125 (i.e gross profit on short sales and increased working expenses) is
within the overall limit of 20% of $71,500
The final and only solution for a financially distressed business which has become insolvent
is to liquidate its assets, service its debts, distribute any remaining funds to shareholders, and
terminate the business. However, prior to that, management usually tries to work closely with the
company’s creditors to provide for their claims while attempting to ensure the firm’s continuing
existence. Various non-judicial arrangements with creditors are available. If these fail, the
company usually ends up in a judicial action under the direction of a bankruptcy court.
• Simply speaking, insolvency is a financial state of being – one that is reached when you are
unable to pay off your debts on time.
• Bankruptcy, on the other hand, is a legal process that serves the purpose of resolving the issue
of insolvency.
In short,
• Insolvency is a situation which arises due to the inability to pay off the outstanding debts on
time to the creditors because the assets are not enough to cover up the liabilities
• Bankruptcy is a situation in which an individual / organization sends an application to the
relevant court, wherein he declares himself as insolvent due to his inability to pay off debts
and expenses, seeking to be declared as a bankrupt
• Receivership is a type of corporate bankruptcy in which a receiver is appointed by bankruptcy
courts or creditors to run the company. The receiver may be appointed by a bankruptcy court,
as a matter of private proceedings, or by a governing body.
COMPANY LIQUIDATION
Meaning and modes of liquidation
Meaning of liquidation
To liquidate means to turn an asset into cash. Liquidation is ‘the process of law whereby a
company is wound up to terminate its corporate life’. It is also referred to (either alternatively or
concurrently) in some jurisdictions as winding up and/or dissolution. In accounting, liquidation
means termination of the firm as a going concern. If a company cannot meet its liabilities a
liquidator will be appointed to realise (sell) the assets of the company and the proceeds, net of
transactions costs, are distributed to the creditors in order of established priority. If there is any
surplus in hand then it is to be distributed to its shareholders. Usually, assets are not adequate
to fully satisfy creditor claims. In this case, creditors share according to the terms of the general
assignment.
1) If the period fixed for the duration of company has been expired or an event on occurrence of which
the company is to be wound up has occurred and company in general meeting has passed an ordinary
resolution requiring the company to be wound up.
2) If the company passes a special resolution that it may be wound up voluntarily.
• By its Members: Members voluntary winding up applies to solvent companies and a declaration
of solvency is necessary within a certain time immediately preceding the date of resolutions for
winding up. The declaration must specify the director’s opinion that company has no doubt or it
will be able to pay debts in full within three years of the commencement of the winding up.
• By the creditors: Creditors voluntary winding up applies to insolvent companies. In such case,
the company calls a meeting of the creditors on the same day or the next day following the day
fixed for company’s general meeting for passing the resolution for winding up.
• After passing a resolution for the voluntary winding up, the court may, at any time, make an
order that voluntary winding up shall continue but subject to such supervision court and with
such liberty for creditors, contributories or others to apply to the court, and generally on such
terms and conditions as the court think fit.
• A court rejects voluntary petitions if the action is considered detrimental to the creditors.
• Involuntary petitions also can be rejected unless evidence exists to indicate that the debtor is not
actually able to meet obligations as they come due. Merely being slow to pay is not sufficient.
1. Preparation of a statement of affairs and a list of creditors: a statement of affairs as of the most recent
date possible; and a list of creditors with full names, addresses and to whose attention notices of the
creditors meeting must be sent by the management of the company to the Liquidator
2. Appointment of a liquidator: he/she may be appointed by the court and approved by the creditors.
3. Sale of the assets. The liquidator will sell the non-cash assets to transform them into cash
4. Settlement of debts. The liquidator will publish, in an appointed newspaper, notice to the creditors that
they should submit any proof of debts. In addition, the liquidator must send notice in writing to all persons
appearing from the company’s books and records to be creditors (including contingent creditors) inviting
them to file a claim against the company within the allocated time period. After the period by which
creditors must submit their claims has expired the liquidator will arrange for the settlement of all of the
company’s outstanding liabilities.
5. After settlement of the company’s debts, the liquidator will return the capital and surplus assets, if any,
to the shareholders.
The primary purpose of statement of affairs is to approximate the estimated amounts available
to each class of claims. It thereby assists all concerned parties in reaching a decision as to what
insolvency action is preferable. Although the statement assumes a liquidation of the insolvent
company, the statement also is used to evaluate the reasonableness of a corporate reorganization.
The statement of affairs is an important planning report instrument for a company’s anticipated
liquidation. The statement of affairs presents
Assets xx
To Debtor company—In Receivership xx
The actual entry details the individual asset accounts and includes the debtor’s company
name.
(3) Statement of realization and liquidation
Trustees examine the proofs of all creditors’ claims against the debtor’s bankruptcy estate, that
is, the debtor’s net assets. Sometimes the trustee receives title to all assets as a receivership,
becomes responsible for the debtor’s actual management, and must direct a plan of liquidation.
A trustee who takes title to the debtor’s assets in a liquidation must make a periodic financial
report to the bankruptcy court on the progress of the liquidation and on the fiduciary relationship
held. Trustees’ reports are different from the traditional financial statements because their legal
rights and responsibilities differ from those of the debtor company’s management.
Trustees prepare a monthly report, called a statement of realization and liquidation to the
bankruptcy court. It shows the results of the trustee’s fiduciary actions beginning at the point
the trustee accepts the debtor’s assets. The statement has three major sections: assets,
supplementary items, and liabilities. The debtor’s liabilities are not transferred to the trustee,
but the trustee may incur new liabilities that must be reported in the statement of realization and
liquidation.
Assets
Supplementary items
Supplementary charges Supplementary credits
Liabilities
Liabilities liquidated Liabilities to be liquidated
Liabilities not liquidated Liabilities incurred
Assets
The assets section of the statement is divided into the four groups shown above:
• The assets to be realized are those received from the debtor company.
• The assets acquired are those subsequently acquired by the trustee.
• The assets realized are those sold by the trustee.
• The assets not realized are those remaining under the trustee’s responsibility as of the end of
the period.
Cash is usually not reported in the statement of realization and liquidation because a separate
cash flow report is typically made.
• Supplementary charges include the trustee’s administration fees and any cash expenses paid
by the trustee.
• Supplementary credits may include any unusual revenue items.
Liabilities
Although the trustee does not record the debtor’s liabilities, the trustee settles some of the
debtor’s payables and may incur new payables during the receivership. The liabilities section of
the statement is divided as shown above:
• The liabilities liquidated are creditors’ claims settled during the period.
• The liabilities not liquidated are those outstanding at the end of the reporting period.
• The liabilities to be liquidated are those debts remaining on the books of the debtor company
for whose liquidation the trustee is responsible as of the date of appointment.
• Finally, the liabilities incurred are new obligations the trustee incurred.
• Legal charges
• Liquidator’s remuneration
• Cost or expenses of winding up
• Workmen’s dues
• Preferential creditors
• Full secured creditors, creditors secured by floating charges, and partially secured creditors
• Unsecured creditors
In case some surplus is still left, it will be distributed among the contributories as follows:
• Preferential shareholders
• Equity shareholders
Each will prepare their own individual financial statements, using the IFRS’s in the normal way.
However, in addition, the parent and subsidiary (collectively referred to as the group) are obliged
by law to prepare a combined set of accounts, known as the consolidated accounts. These
consolidated accounts are prepared and presented as if all the companies in the group are
just one single entity. This means that it is necessary to exclude transactions between group
companies, as failure to do so could result in the assets and profits being overstated for group
purposes.
The accounting rules governing the preparation of consolidated accounts (also known as group
accounts) are set out in a number of standards, namely:
IFRS 3 has recently been revised and those revisions are now examinable. The main changes
that have been introduced are as follows:
• Expenses that can be treated as part of acquisition costs have been restricted.
• The treatment of Contingent Consideration has been significantly altered.
• A new method of measuring Non-Controlling Interests (formerly known as Minority Interest)
has been introduced. This new method (though not mandatory), if used, will have an effect on
goodwill.
• The recognition and measurement of identifiable assets and liabilities of the acquired subsidiary
has been refined. Guidance has now been provided on intangible assets such as market-related,
customer-related, artistic-related and technology-related assets
IAS 27 covers some of the principles that must be applied in consolidating the accounts of group
companies. It also sets out the circumstances when subsidiary companies must be excluded
from consolidation.
B. DEFINITIONS
In both IFRS 10 and IFRS 3, the definitions of a subsidiary and control are the same.
Control is the power to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain
benefits from its activities.
IFRS 10 however, outlines four other situations where control exists. Even though the parent
might own half or less of the voting power of another company, control also exists when there is:
• Power over more than half of the voting rights by virtue of an agreement with other investors;
• Power to govern the financial and operating policies of the entity under a statute or an
agreement
• Power to appoint or remove the majority of the members of the board of directors or
equivalent governing body and control of the entity is by that board or body; or
• Power to cast the majority of votes at meetings of the board of directors or equivalent
governing body and control of the entity is by that board or body.
A parent loses control when it loses the power to govern the financial and operating policies of
the subsidiary. The loss of control can occur with or without a change in ownership levels; for
example, if the subsidiary becomes subject to an administrator or liquidator.
However, there are exemptions from the requirement to prepare group accounts if, and only if,
the following situations apply:
• The parent is itself a wholly owned subsidiary, or is a partially owned subsidiary and its other
owners have been informed about, and do not object to, the parent not presenting
consolidated financial statements.
For example:
P %
75
S %
P owns 75% of the ordinary shares of S and S owns 60% of the ordinary shares of T.
P must prepare group accounts combining all three companies. S may have to prepare group
accounts combining S and T. But if the other owners of S (25%) agree, S is exempt from
preparing such group accounts.
• The exemption only applies if the parents shares or debt is not traded in a public market or is
about to issue shares in a public market; and
• The ultimate parent (or intermediate parent) of the parent produces consolidated financial
statements that comply with IFRS’s.
All subsidiaries of the parent must be included in the consolidated accounts. Previously, it
was argued that some subsidiaries should be excluded from the group accounts. But now, the
standards are unequivocal. There are no exceptions to the requirement for a subsidiary under
the control of the parent to be included in the group accounts.
However, if on acquisition a subsidiary meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale in
accordance with IFRS 5, it must be accounted for in accordance with that standard. This requires
that it will be shown separately on the face of the consolidated Statement of Financial Position.
There should be evidence that the subsidiary has been acquired with the intention of disposing
it within 12 months and management is actively seeking a buyer.
A subsidiary that has previously been excluded from consolidation and is not disposed of within
the 12 month period must be consolidated from the date of acquisition.
However, if there are severe restrictions on the ability of the parent to manage a subsidiary, so that
its ability to transfer funds to the parent is impaired, then such an entity must be excluded from
the consolidation process, as control has effectively been lost. In this situation, the investment in
the subsidiary will be treated under IAS 39, as a non-current asset investment.
E. ACCOUNTING DATES
IAS 27 requires that the financial statements of the individual companies in the group be prepared
as of the same reporting date. If the reporting date of the parent and subsidiary differ, then the
subsidiary should prepare additional financial statements as of the same date as the parent,
unless it is impracticable to do so.
If it is considered impracticable, then the financial statements of the subsidiary should be adjusted
for significant transactions or events that occur between the date of the subsidiary’s financial
statements and the date of the parent financial statements. However, the difference between the
reporting dates must not be more than three months.
F. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
All companies in the group should have the same accounting policies, without exception. If
a member of the group uses different policies from those adopted in the financial statements,
appropriate adjustments are made to its financial statements in preparing consolidated financial
statements.
G. CESSATION OF CONTROL
If an entity ceases to be a subsidiary, then the investment in the entity will be accounted for
in accordance with IAS 39 Financial Instruments from the date it ceases to be a subsidiary,
provided that it does not become an associate company or a jointly controlled entity.
I. ACQUISTION COSTS
In the previous IFRS 3, directly related costs such a professional fees (legal, accounting, valuation
etc.) could be included as part of the cost of the acquisition. This is now no longer the case and
such costs must now be expensed.
The costs of issuing debt or equity are to be accounted for under the rules of IAS 39 Financial
Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.
CONTINGENT CONSIDERATION
The previous version of IFRS 3 required contingent consideration to be accounted for only if it
was considered
probable that it would become payable. This approach has now been amended.
The revised standard requires the acquirer to recognise the fair value of any contingent
consideration at the date of acquisition to be included as part of the consideration for the acquiree.
The “fair value” approach is consistent with the way in which other forms of consideration are
valued. Fair value is defined as “the amount for which an asset could be exchanged, or liability
settled between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm’s length transaction”.
However, applying this definition to contingent consideration is not easy as the definition
is largely hypothetical. It is most unlikely that the acquisition-date liability for contingent
consideration could be (or would be) settled by “willing parties in an arm’s length transaction”. It
is expected that in an examination context, the fair value of any contingent consideration at the
date of acquisition will be given (or how to calculate it).
The payment of contingent consideration may be in the form of equity or a liability such as a debt
instrument and should be recorded as such under the rules of IAS 32 Financial Instruments:
Presentation (or other applicable standard).
The standard also addresses the problem of changes in the fair value of any contingent
consideration after acquisition date. If the change is due to additional information obtained after
acquisition date that affects the fact or circumstances as they existed at acquisition date, this is
treated as a “measurement period adjustment” and the liability (and goodwill) are re-measured.
In essence, this is a retrospective adjustment and is similar in nature to an adjusting event under
IAS 10 Events After the Reporting Period.
Contingent consideration classified as equity shall not be re-measured and its subsequent
settlement will be accounted for within equity, e.g.
Debit Retained Earnings
Credit Share Capital / Share Premium
*Contingent consideration is normally a liability but may be an asset if the acquirer has the right
to a return of
some of the consideration transferred, if certain conditions are met.
An acquirer has a maximum period of 12 months to finalise the acquisition accounting. The
adjustment period ends when the acquirer has gathered all the necessary information, subject
to the one year maximum. There is no exemption from the 12-month rule for deferred tax assets
or changes in the amount of contingent consideration. The revised standard will only allow
adjustments against goodwill within this one-year period.
Deferred consideration should be measured at fair value at the date of acquisition. This means
that future payment should be shown at its Present Value, by discounting the future amount at
the company’s cost of capital. Each year, the discount will be then “unwound”. This will increase
the deferred liability every year, with the discount treated as a finance cost in the Statement of
Comprehensive Income.
EXAMPLE
WR Ltd acquires 27 million shares in LR Ltd. The consideration is effected by a share for share
exchange of two shares in WR Ltd for every three shares acquired in LR Ltd and a cash payment
of RWF2 per share
acquired, payable 3 years after acquisition. WR Ltd.’s shares have a nominal value of RWF1 and
a market value of RWF2.50 at acquisition.
RWF RWF
Cost of Investment X Cost of Investment X
Less: Less:
Parents share of net Parents share of net
assets assets
Total Goodwill Fair Value of NCI at X
acquisition
impaired to date
(X) Less: X
Carrying Value in SFP Parents Share + NCI
Share
(X)
Less:
Total Goodwill X
impaired to date
Negative Goodwill
IFRS 3 refers to negative goodwill as “discount on acquisition”. It arises when the fair value of the
consideration given to acquire the subsidiary is less than the fair value of the net assets purchased.
It is an unusual situation to arise, and the standard advises that should negative goodwill be
calculated, the calculation should be reviewed, to ensure that the fair value of assets and liabilities
are not inadvertently misstated.
Following the review, any negative goodwill remaining is credited to the Statement of
Comprehensive Income immediately.
OR
Pre-Acquisition reserves are the reserves existing at the date the subsidiary company is
acquired. They are included in the goodwill calculation.
In addition, the Goodwill, NCI and Consolidated reserves as calculated in Steps 3, 4 and 5 are
included. Note that the Share Capital and Share Premium to be included will be those of the
parent company only.
EXAMPLE
The draft SFPs of PD Ltd and PR Ltd at the 31st December 2010 are shown below:
PD Ltd PR Ltd
RWF’000 RWF’000
Assets
Property, Plant and Equipment 90 100
Investment in PR Ltd (at cost) 110 -
Current Assets 50 30
250 130
Equity and Liabilities
Ordinary share Capital RWF1 100
PD Ltd purchased 80% of the ordinary shares of PR Ltd on 1st January 2010 when the retained
profits of PR Ltd were RWF15,000. To date, goodwill is not impaired.
Prepare the consolidated Statement of Financial position at the 31st December 2010, assuming
that the PD Group values the non-controlling interest using the proportion of net assets method.
Step 2 Adjustments
Not applicable in this question
RWF’000 RWF’000
Share Capital 100 100
Retained Earnings 15 20
115 120
No Impairment of Goodwill has occurred. Thus, goodwill to be included in the consolidated SFP
is RWF18,000
PR Ltd.
Per SFP 20
At acquisition 15
Post Acquisition 5
x group share x 80%
4
Consolidated Retained Earnings 124
PD GROUP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AT 31ST DECEMBER 2010
ASSETS
RWF’000
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
goodwill 18
Property, plant and equipment (90 + 100) 190
208
CURRENT ASSETS (50 + 30) 80
288
The following are the Statements of Financial Position of FR Ltd and TK Ltd at 31st December
2010:
FR.Ltd TK Ltd
RWF’000
RWF’000
ASSETS
NON-CURRENT ASSETS 5,500
Property, Plant and equipment 1,500
Investment in TK Ltd, at cost 1,000 -
CURRENT ASSETS
Inventory 550 100
Receivables 400 200
Cash 200 50
7,650 1,850
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
CAPITAL AND RESERVES
Share Capital 2,000 500
Retained earnings 1,400 300
3,400 800
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES 3,000 400
CURRENT LIABILITIES 1,250 650
7,650 1,850
The FR group values the Non-Controlling Interest using the fair value method. At the date of
acquisition, the fair value of the 20% Non-Controlling Interest was RWF380,000.
The consolidated goodwill has been impaired by one fifth of its value.
TK Ltd
Group
80% NCI
20%
TK Ltd is a subsidiary, having been acquired 2 years ago.
Step 2 Adjustments
(i) Record the issue of shares
RWF’000 RWF’000
625 800
FR Ltd.
Per SFP 1,400
Unwinding of discount 1,321
(79)
TK Ltd
Per SFP 300
At acquisition
Post Acquisition 140
125 1,461
175 x group share
x 80%
FR GROUP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AT 31ST DECEMBER 2010
ASSETS
RWF’000
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Goodwill 1,192
Property, plant and equipment (5,500 + 1,500) 7,000
8,192
CURRENT ASSETS
Inventory (550 + 100) 650
Receivables (400 + 200) 600
Cash (200 + 50) 250
9,692
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
Ordinary share capital (2,000 + 200) 2,200
Share premium 160
Retained Earnings 1,223
3,583
Non-Controlling Interest 355
3,938
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES (3,000 + 400) 3,400
Once the basic concept of consolidating accounts has been understood, the more complicated
adjustments can be introduced.
The adjustments involve a number of different scenarios, but a theme common to most of them
is that they involve amounts that have been paid or remain payable between companies in the
group.
IFRS 3 defines the fair value of an asset (and a liability) as being the amount for which an asset
could be exchanged, or a liability settled, between knowledgeable willing parties in an arm’s
length transaction.
The standard goes on to outline how the fair values of various assets and liabilities can be
determined and is summarised in the following table:
Acquired intangible assets must always be recognised and measured. Unlike the previous IFRS
3, there is no exception where reliable measurement cannot be obtained.
If further evidence regarding the fair values of acquired assets and liabilities only becomes
available after acquisition (i.e. some asset or liability values were only estimated at acquisition),
the consolidated financial statements should be adjusted to reflect this additional evidence. But,
this adjustment can only be made if the new evidence becomes available within twelve months
after the acquisition.
If this is the case, the assets or liabilities should be adjusted to the new values, as if these new
values had been used from the date of acquisition.
If an asset is to be revalued upwards at the date of acquisition, from its carrying amount to its fair
value, then the following adjustment is made when preparing the consolidated accounts:
Credit Revaluation Reserve (Fair Value adjustment) of Subsidiary at date of acquisition and at
the SFP date
With the amount of the increase. (If it is a decrease, reverse the above journal entry)
Example
P acquired 75% of the share capital of S, four years ago. At the date of acquisition, the fair value
of a machine
exceeded the book value by RWF10,000, in the books of S. S depreciates the machine at 20%
per annum, straight-line.
Solution
When preparing the consolidated accounts, the following journal adjustment will be carried out:
RWF RWF
Dr. Machine Account 10,000
In addition, the depreciation will have to be accounted for. For group purposes, the depreciation
should be based on the fair value.
RWF RWF
Dr Reserves (S) 80,000
The goods, shown in inventory, will contain an element of profit which from a group perspective,
has not been realised. Bearing in mind that the group accounts seek to present the members of
the group as if they were one single entity, this profit must be eliminated.
• Dr Reserves of seller
• Cr Inventory
With the profit on inventory
Example
P acquired 75% of S four years ago. During the year, P sold goods to S for RWF10,000. This
included a mark- up of 25%. At the end of the year, S has one quarter of the goods remaining
in stock.
Solution
(a) Calculate profit.
The goods were sold for RWF10,000 including a mark-up of 25%. This means the profit on the
transaction was RWF2,000.
One quarter of the goods remains in stock, so one quarter of the profit remains also. Thus
RWF2,000 x ¼
= RWF500 must be eliminated.
RWF RWF
Dr Reserves of P* 500
Cr Inventory 500
*P sold the goods and recorded the profit. Thus it is P’s reserves that are adjusted.
• Dr Reserves of seller
• Cr Asset Account
With the profit
Example
P purchased 75% of S, four years ago. Two years ago, S sold a machine with a book value of
RWF20,000 to P
for RWF23,000.
Solution
(a) Calculate the inter-group profit.
The profit made by S on the sale was RWF3,000. (b) Eliminate the profit
RWF RWF
Dr Reserves of S 3,000
Cr Machine Account 3,000
However, there is also the extra problem of depreciation. P on buying the asset, charges
depreciation on its cost to P (RWF23,000). But, for group purposes the asset should be
depreciated based on its original cost to the group (RWF20,000)
Thus, for group purposes, over the last two years, total extra depreciation charged by P on the
asset would be:
RWF RWF
Dr Machine Account 1,200
Cr Reserves of P* 1,200
*P purchased the asset, so P charged the depreciation. This journal adjustment reverses the
extra depreciation charged.
E. INTER-COMPANY DEBTS
As the entities in the group are being presented as if they are just one single economic entity,
amounts owing between group companies must be eliminated for consolidation purposes.
The holding company and subsidiary are likely to trade with each other, which could lead to
inter-company debtors and creditors arising at the year end. Inter-company indebtedness
should be cancelled out when preparing the consolidated Statement of Financial Position.
H Ltd S Ltd
RWF RWF
Non Current Assets 700 300
Investment in Subsidiary 500 -
Inventories 240 220
Receivables 190 180
Bank 70 170
1,700 870
H Limited acquired 100% of S Limited several years ago when the reserves of S Limited were
Nil. At the year- end H Limited’s receivables figure includes RWF60 owing from S Limited. S
Limited’s payables figure includes RWF60 owing to H Limited.
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position H Ltd Group
RWF
Non Current Assets (700 + 300) 1,000
Inventories (240 + 220) 460
Receivables (190 + 180 - 60) 310
Bank (70 + 170) 240
2,010
Statement of Financial
Position
H Ltd S Ltd
RWF RWF
Non Current Assets 700 900
Investment in Subsidiary 500 -
Loan to S Limited 300 -
Current Account 200 -
Other Current Assets 50 350
1,750 1,250
H Limited acquired 100% of S Limited several years ago when the reserves of S Limited were
Nil. H Limited made a loan of RWF300 to S Limited to help finance the expansion of S Limited.
H Limited and S Limited trade with each other and maintain a current account to identify their
indebtedness.
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position H Limited Group
RWF
Non Current Assets (700 + 900) 1,600
The loan by H Limited to S Limited cancels out against the loan in S Limited’s Statement of
Financial Position. Likewise the current account in H Limited cancels out against the current
account in S Limited. Occasionally the receivables/payables or the current accounts maintained
by the holding company and subsidiary company may not agree, the reason for this difference
will be due to either inventory in transit and/or cash in transit from one entity to another.
Statement of Financial
Position
H Ltd S Ltd
RWF RWF
Non Current Assets 1,800 1,000
Investment in Subsidiary 500 -
Current Account 200 -
Inventory 300 270
Receivables 250 260
Bank 150 100
3,200 1,630
H Limited acquired 100% of S Limited for RWF500 several years ago when the latter had a
reserves balance of Nil. Inventory in transit from S Limited to H Limited at cost price amounted
to RWF20. Cash in transit from S Limited amounted to RWF30.
Inter-Company Account
RWF RWF
Current Account - -
However, the holders of preference shares are entitled to participate in the profits of a company
upon its winding up.
The parent, as well as purchasing ordinary (equity) shares, may also purchase preference
shares, though the relevant percentage holdings may be different. For example, P might own
75% of the equity shares of S, but only 30% of the preference shares.
In calculating the goodwill figure, the cost of preference shares is compared to their nominal
value. This will be done in the cost of control account.
The nominal value of the preference shares held by outside interests will be reflected in the Non-
Controlling
Interest account.
If the parent buys these loan notes, like preference shares, the difference between their cost and
nominal value will be included in the cost of control account in arriving at the overall goodwill
figure.
The balance of the loan notes not held by the parent, though held by outside interests, is not
included in the Non- Controlling Interest figure. Rather, it is shown separately as non-current
liabilities in the consolidated Statement of Financial Position.
The treatment of inter-group dividends can be confusing. This is mainly because there are a
number of different possible situations.
IAS 10 Events After the Reporting Date allows dividends to be included as a liability in the
balance only if those dividends had been declared before the year-end. Declared means that the
dividends have been appropriately authorised and are no longer at the discretion of the entity.
So, in treating dividends payable in the question, make sure that they can be recognised in
the first place. There are two classes of dividends to be aware of when preparing consolidated
accounts:
• Dividends out of post-acquisition profits.
These are dividends paid or payable out of profits that have been earned since the date of
acquisition.
• Dividends out of pre-acquisition profits.
These are dividends paid or payable out of profits earned before the acquisition date. It is an
important distinction to make, as the accounting treatment of each is very different.
Example
P acquired 75% of S, four years ago. In the current year, the directors of S propose a dividend
of RWF80,000. The proposal is made prior to the year-end. P reflects the dividend receivable
in its books.
P S P S
RWF RWF RWF RWF
Dividends 60,000 - Dividends Payable - 80,000
Receivable*
*P owns 75% of the shares, so it will get 75% of the dividend i.e. RWF80,000 x 75% =
RWF60,000
Thus, the required journal entry would be:
RWF RWF
Dr Dividends Payable 60,000
Dividends Receivable
RWF RWF
Dividends Payable
RWF RWF
Dividend Receivable 60,000 Balance b/d (S) 80,000
Solution
Extracts from the Statement of Financial Position of P and S would show:
P S P S
RWF RWF RWF RWF
Dividends Receivable - - Dividends Payable - 80,000
The required journal entries would be:
RWF RWF
Dr Dividends Receivable 60,000
Cr Reserves P 60,000
RWF RWF
Dr Dividends Payable 60,000
Cr Dividends Receivable 60,000
Dividends Payable
RWF RWF
Dividends Receivable 60,000
Balance b/d (S) 80,000
Dividends Receivable
RWF RWF
Reserves (P) 60,000 Dividends Payable 60,000
*Again this balance would be shown as a current liability in the consolidated Statement of
Financial
Position.
Dividends out of Pre-Acquisition Profits
These are dividends paid out of the subsidiary’s reserves at the date of acquisition. The parent
company should
reduce the cost of its investment by the amount of the pre-acquisition dividend it receives.
Care should be taken to reduce the reserves of the subsidiary at the date of acquisition by the
Dr Bank
Cr Cost of investment in the subsidiary
With the parents share of the dividend
Example
H Limited acquired 80% of S Limited for RWF1,700 when the latter company’s reserves were
RWF1,000. Several months after the acquisition, S Limited paid a dividend of RWF150 out of
their RWF1,000 reserves. H
Limited credited its share of the dividend, 80% of RWF150, i.e. RWF120 and reduced the cost
of the investment from RWF1,700 to RWF1,700 - RWF120, i.e. RWF1,580. The Statements of
Financial Position of H Limited and S Limited are set out below several years after acquisition.
H Ltd S Ltd
RWF RWF
Non Current Assets 6,000 3,000
Investment in Subsidiary 1,580 -
Current Assets 3,420 2,000
11,000 5,000
Less:
Share of net assets acquired:
Capital 500
Reserves (1,000 – 150) 850
1,350
Group share 80% 1,080
Goodwill 500
Assuming the group uses the proportion of net assets method for valuing NCI
Calculation of NCI:
20% x (500 + 4,500) = 1,000
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position H Limited Group
RWF
Non Current assets (6000 + 3,000) 9,000
Goodwill 500
Current Assets (3,420 + 2,000) 5,420
14,920
Often in examination questions, the holding company may have credited its share of the pre-
acquisition dividend to its reserves. In this case, a correcting journal entry should be made in
preparing the consolidated Statement of Financial Position, i.e.
Dr H Limited reserves
Cr Investment in Subsidiary
Thereby effectively reducing the cost of the investment
Example
H Limited acquired 80% of S Limited on 30th June 20X4 for RWF350. The revenue reserves of
S Limited at 1st January 20X4 were RWF100. Set out below are the respective Statements of
Financial Position of H Limited and S Limited.
Calculation of Goodwill:
Cost of Investment 350
Less:
Share of net assets acquired at acquisition
Capital 200
Reserves (see below) 125
325
x group share x 80% 260
Goodwill 90
Reserves at acquisition:
RWF Reserves at 1st January 20X4 100
Profits accrued to 30th June 20X4 RWF50 x 6/12 25
125
RWF
Non Current Assets (600 + 280) 880
Goodwill 90
Current Assets (250 + 70) 320
1,290
Share Capital 500
Reserves 700 + (150 – 125 x 80%) 720
1,220
Non-Controlling Interest (350 x 20%) 70
1,290
Before we look at a comprehensive example requiring the preparation of a consolidated Statement
of Financial Position, remember the six steps to be taken in solving the question.
1. Establish Group Structure
Which company is the acquirer and to what extent do they control the acquiree? When was the
subsidiary acquired?
Group structure is established by reference to the number of ordinary shares held by the parent
company
(usually in questions, anyway. See alternative ways of establishing control at the beginning of this
area).
2. Determine the adjustments to be made and the journal entries to effect these adjustments.
Examine the question to see if goodwill has become impaired. If it has, reduce goodwill and set
it against consolidated reserves.
Example
HDY acquired 4 million of SBL’s equity shares paying RWF4.50 each and RWF500,000 (at
par) of its 10% redeemable preference shares on 1st April 20X5. At this date the accumulated
retained earnings of SBL were RWF8,400,000.
Reproduced below are the draft Statements of Financial Position of the two companies at 31st
March 20X8.
Assets
Non Current Assets
HDY SBL
RWF’000 RWF’000 RWF’000 RWF’000
Property, plant and equipment 42,450 22,220
Investment in SBL:
Equity 18,000 -
Extracts from the unadjusted Statement of Comprehensive Income of SBL for the year to 31st
March 20X8 are:
RWF’000
(2) Also at the date that SBL was acquired, its property, plant and equipment included plant that had
a fair value of RWF4 million in excess of its carrying value. This plant had a remaining life of 5
years. The group calculates depreciation on a straight-line basis. The fair value of SBL’s other
net assets approximated to their carrying values.
(3) During the year SBL sold goods to HDY for RWF1.8 million. SBL adds a 20% mark-up on cost
to all its sales. Goods with a transfer price of RWF450,000 were included in HDY’s inventory at
31st March
20X8.
The balance on the current accounts of the parent and subsidiary was RWF240,000 on 31st March
20X8.
REQUIREMENT
(a) Prepare the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position of HDY at 31st March 20X8, assuming
the group uses the proportion of net assets method for measuring Non-Controlling Interest.
Goodwill is not impaired.
(b) Calculate the Non-Controlling Interest in the adjusted profit of Sibling for the year to 31st March
20X8.
1. Establish Group Structure
SBL Preference Shares
Group (4m/5m) 80% 25%
Non-Controlling Interest 20% 75%
2. Journal Adjustments
RWF’000 RWF’000
Dr Property, Plant and Equipment 1,500
Cr Revaluation Reserve 1,500
RWF’000 RWF’000
Dr Property, Plant and Equipment 4,000
Cr. Revaluation reserve at acquisition and at SFP date 4,000
RWF4m
= RWF800,000 pa x 3 years * = RWF2,400,000
5 years
Therefore:
RWF’000 RWF’000
Dr Reserves SBL 2,400
Cr Property, Plant and Equipment 2,400
*Acquisition occurred three years ago.
RWF’000 RWF’000
Dr Payables 240
Cr Payables 240
3. Calculate Goodwill
19,400 25,305
The redeemable preference shares were acquired at par. No premium was paid, thus no
goodwill implication.
4. Calculate NCI
Note:
Because the preference capital is redeemable, the portion belonging to the Non-Controlling
Interest must be shown as a liability, in accordance with IAS 32.
Retained earnings
HDY
Per SFP 52,640
SBL
Per SFP 15,280
Depreciation (2,400)
Inventory profit (75)
12,805
At Acquisition 8,400
Post acquisition 4,405
Group Share x 80% 3,524
Consolidated Retained Earnings 56,164
Revaluation Reserve
SBL
Per SFP -
Revaluation 1,500
1,500
At acquisition -
Post acquisition 1,500
Group Share x 80% 1,200
RWF’000 RWF’000
Assets
Non Current Assets
Property, plant and equipment (W1) 69,770
Consolidated goodwill (see cost of control 2,480 72,250
account)
Current assets
Inventories (9,850 + 6,590 – 75) 16,365
Trade receivables (11,420 + 3,830 – 240) 15,010
Cash and bank 490 31,865
Total assets 104,115
72,425
Non-current liabilities
10% Loan notes (12,000 + 4,000) 16,000
Example
Pink ltd purchased 80% of the shares in Silver Ltd on 1st April 2007 in a 1 for 2 share exchange.
Pink ltd issued
5 of its own shares for every 2 it acquired in Silver. The market value of Pink ltd shares on 1st
April 2007 was RWF3 each. The share issue has not yet been recorded in Pink ltd. The retained
earnings of Silver at acquisition were RWF430,000.
PINK SILVER
RWF’000 RWF’000
RWF’000 RWF’000
Assets
Non Current Assets
Property, Plant and Equipment 620 660
Investments 20 10
640 670
Current Assets
Inventory 240 280
Receivables 170 210
Bank 20 40
430 530
1,070 1,200
150
Equity and liabilities
Capital and reserves
Ordinary shares of RWF1 each 400
(2) Goodwill is to be measured in full. The fair value of the non-controlling interests at the date
of acquisition was RWF250,000. Goodwill is to be impaired by 30% at the reporting date.
(3) At the start of the current financial year, Pink transferred a machine to Silver in exchange
for RWF15,000. The asset had a remaining economic life of 3 years at the date of transfer. It had
a carrying value of RWF12,000 in the books of Pink at the date of transfer.
(4) Silver sold goods to Pink for RWF60,000, including a mark-up of 20%. At the year end, Pink had
40% of these goods remaining in inventory.
(5) At the year end, Silver’s books showed a receivables balance of RWF6,000 as being due
from Pink. This amount disagreed with the payables balance of RWF1,000 in Pink’s books. The
difference is caused by a payment sent to Silver shortly before the year end, which Silver had not
received prior to cut-off.
Prepare the consolidated Statement of Financial Position for the year ended 31st March 2010.
SILVER
Group 80%
NCI 20%
Silver is a subsidiary acquired 3 years ago.
Step 2 Adjustments
Depreciation
20,000 = 2,000 p.a.
10 yrs x 3 years
6,000
Depreciation
3,000 = 1,000 p.a.
3 years x 1 year
1,000
600 861
Less:
NCI share of Net Assets at acquisition (600 x 20%) (120)
PINK
Per SFP 450
Profit on sale of asset ( 3)
Goodwill impaired (132)
315.0
SILVER
Per SFP 700
FV adjustment 20
Pink Group
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position at 31st March 2010
PINK
RWF’000 RWF’000
Assets
Non Current Assets
Property, Plant and Equipment (620+660+20-6-3+1) 1,292
Goodwill 385
Investments (20+10) 30 1,707
Current Assets
Inventory (240+280-4) 516
Receivables (170+210-5-1) 374
Bank (20+40+5) 65 955
2,662
Associates
Sometimes the investment in another entity is not enough to give it control, but such is the
amount of voting
power acquired that the investor exercises significant influence over the investee.
In this case, the entity in which such an investment is held is called an “associate” company.
Thus, the associate is an entity over which the investor has significant influence and that is
neither a subsidiary nor an interest in a joint venture.
Significant influence is the power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions
of the investee but is not control or joint control over those policies. The standard goes on to
state that if the investor has 20% or more of the voting power of the investee, then there is a
presumption of participating interest.
A shareholding of less than 20% does not give significant influence, unless such influence can
be clearly demonstrated.
However, an important point to understand is that, though a shareholding of between 20% and
50% will normally constitute an investment in an associate, the investor must actually exercise
its significant influence.
Use of the equity method must cease if the investor loses significant influence over an
associate.
Differing Dates
When applying the equity method, the associate company’s most recent financial statements are
used. When the
accounting dates differ, the associate should produce financial statements at the same date of
the investor. Where this is impracticable, the financial statements of the different date may be
used, but subject to adjustment for significant events and transactions.
C. DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
The following must be disclosed in respect of an associate:
• Fair value of investments in associates for which there are published price quotations
• Summarised financial information of associates, including aggregated amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and profit or loss
• Reasons explaining the existence or otherwise of significant influence
• Reporting date of associate if different to investor and reasons for the difference
• Nature and extent of any significant restrictions on the ability of the associates to transfer funds
to the investor
• Unrecognised share of losses of an associate, both for the period and cumulatively, if an investor
has discontinued recognition of its share of losses of an associate
• The fact that an associate is not accounted for using the equity method, together with summarised
financial information of such associates, including total assets, total liabilities, revenues and
profit or loss
• The investors share of contingent liabilities of an associate incurred jointly with other investors
and those contingent liabilities that arise because the investor is severally liable for all or part of
the liabilities of the associate
Investments in associates accounted for using the equity method must be classified as non-
current assets. The investor’s share of the profit or loss of the associates, and the carrying
amount of the investment, must be disclosed separately in the accounts.
Under equity accounting, the investment in an associate is carried to the consolidated balance
sheet at a valuation. This valuation is calculated as:
In addition, the goodwill arising on acquisition of the shares in the investment must be calculated.
This goodwill is not separately shown; rather it is included in the cost of the investment.
However, if the goodwill becomes impaired, this will reduce the value of the investment.
Therefore:
Dr Reserves of Parent
Cr Investment in Associate
RWF RWF
Cost X
Less: Share of Net Assets at Acquisition
Investors share of share capital X
Investors share of share premium X
Investors share of reserves X
(X)
Goodwill X
Note: If the question mentions nothing about impairment, there is no need to calculate goodwill.
Example
P acquired 25% of the ordinary share capital of A for RWF640,000 on 31st December 20X2 when
the retained earnings of A stood at RWF720,000. P appointed two directors to the board of A and
the investment is regarded as long-term. Both companies prepare their financial statements to
31st December each year. The summarised balance sheet of A on 31st December 20X4 is as
follows:
RWF’000
Sundry assets 2,390
Capital and reserves
Share capital 800
A has made no new issues of shares nor has there been any movement in the share premium
account since P
acquired its holding.
Show at what amount the investment in A will be shown in the consolidated balance sheet of P
as on 31st
December 20X4.
Solution
This figure is calculated as:
RWF
Cost 640,000
Share of post-acquisition profits (25% x (1,140 – 720)) 105,000
745,000
In a “T” account it would look like this (in investor’s accounts)
745,000 745,000
Balance b/d 745,000
Investment in Associate
RWF
RWF2,390,000 x 25% 597,500
Add Goodwill (see below) 147,500
745,000
Goodwill Calculation:
RWF RWF
Cost of investment 640,000
Less: Share of net assets at acquisition
Share capital (25% x 800,000) 200,000
Share premium (25% x 450,000) 112,500
(25% x 720,000) 180,000
(492,500)
Goodwill 147,500
Note: The first method is generally easier
Thus:
• Calculate the profit on inventory
• Calculate the group share of the profit
• Cancel the group share of profit. This is done as follows:
• Dr Reserves of Parent
• Cr Investment in Associate
With the group share of profit on inventory
(Note: If the inventory lies with the parent, credit inventory instead of investment in associate)
Inter-Company Debts
Because the associate company is not consolidated, inter-company loans (between the
investor and associate)
will not be cancelled out.
Loans to and from associates and parents are not netted off. Long-term loans may appear,
sometimes, in the same section as investments in associates, though this is rarely done.
Example
The summarised balance sheets of BCP, TNL and RSH as at 31st March 20X7 are as follows:
Equity:
Ordinary shares of .25 each 4,000 500 200
Reserves:
Share premium 800 125
Retained earnings at 31st March 2,300 380 450
20X6
Retained for year 1,760 400 150
8,860 1,405 800
Current liabilities:
Trade payables 2,120 3,070 142
The receivables of BCP include an amount owing from TNL of RWF250,000. This does
not agree with the corresponding amount in the books of TNL due to a cash payment of
RWF50,000 made on 29th March 20X7 which had not been received by BCL at the year end.
Required
A consolidated statement of financial position of the BCP Group as at 31st March 20X7, using
the proportion of net assets method to value NCI.
TNL RSH
Group 80% 40%
Non-Controlling 20% 60%
Interest
Thus, TNL is a subsidiary, acquired at the start of RSH is an associate, acquired
the year. year. during the
Being the group share of post-acquisition reserves i.e. 40% x (150 x 6/12)
No mention is made of any goodwill being impaired. Therefore there is no need to calculate
goodwill of associate in this question.
Firstly,
RWF’000 RWF’000
Dr Reserves TNL 200
Cr Development Expenditure 200
Secondly,
When calculating goodwill later in the cost of control account, remember that the reserves of
TNL
at the date of acquisition fall RWF80,000 from RWF380,000 to RWF300,000.
RWF’000 RWF’000
Dr Reserves TNL (seller) 40
Cr Inventory 40
Secondly,
BCP sold goods to RSH
RWF’000 RWF’000
Dr Reserves of BCP 10
Cr Investment in RSH 10
Dr Cash 50
Cr Receivables 50
Being the cash in transit
Then
RWF’000
Dr Payables 200 RWF’000
Cr Receivables 200
3. Calculate Goodwill
TNL
Per SFP 780
Profit on inventory (40)
Development Expenditure (200)
540
At Acquisition (380 – 80) 300
Post Acquisition 240
X group share x 80% 4,080
192
4,272
Goodwill 460
Investment in associate (Note 1) 420
9,125
Current assets:
Inventory (2,740 + 1,280 – 40) 3,980
Receivables (1,960 + 980 – 250) 2,690
Bank (1,260 + 50 cash in transit) 1,310
7,980
5,072
9,072
Non-Controlling Interest 233
Note 1:
Investment in associated company
RWF’000
Share of net assets [(800 x 40%) – 10 310
inventory]
Goodwill 110
420
Notice in the balance sheet above, there is only one figure concerning the investment in the
associate. The individual assets and liabilities of the associate company are not included in the
group accounts. BCP does not control RSH.
A joint venture is a contractual arrangement whereby two or more parties undertake an economic
activity that is subject to joint control. (Note that the term joint venture can also refer to an entity
that is jointly controlled by other entities).
Joint control is the contractually agreed sharing of control over an economic activity and it exists
only when the strategic financial and operating decisions relating to the activity require the
unanimous consent of the parties sharing control. (These parties are known as the venturers).
The contract therefore becomes a very important factor in a joint venture. The contract may take
a variety of forms e.g. a contract between the venturers, the minutes of discussions between
venturers or writing an arrangement into the articles of the joint venture.
The contractual arrangement must ensure that no single venturer is in a position to control the
activity on their own. Duties may be delegated to different venturers but if one has the power to
govern the financial and operating policies of the economic activity, then the venture becomes a
subsidiary and not a joint venture.
Types of Joint Ventures
There are three different types of joint venture
The agreement between the venturers usually indicates how the revenue and any expenses
incurred in common are to be shared out.
An example would be where two venturers, X and Y, combine their resources and expertise to
build a new rocket. Different parts of the manufacturing process are carried out by each. Each
incurs its own cost and share the revenue, as agreed by contract.
• The assets that it controls and the liability that it incurs; and
• The expenses that it incurs and the share of income that it earns from the joint venture
Separate accounting records for the joint venture might not be kept. But the venturers might
prepare management accounts in order to assess performance.
Each venturer takes a share of the output from the assets and each bears an agreed share of
the expenses incurred.
Such a joint venture is often used in the oil, gas and mineral extraction industries. For example
a number of oil companies may jointly own a pipeline. Each uses it to transport their own oil and
each pays an agreed proportion of the expenses.
CPA EXAMINATION I1.2 FINANCIAL REPORTING 319
STUDY MANUAL
Each venturer should recognise in its financial statements:
Accounting records may be limited in the case of jointly controlled assets, perhaps merely
recording common expenses.
The jointly controlled entity has its own assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Each venturer
is entitled to a share of the profits of the joint venture.
The jointly controlled entity maintains its own records and prepares its own financial
statements. Each venturer contributes cash and/or other resources which are included in the
records of the venturer as an investment in a joint venture.
In the preparation of consolidated financial statements, IAS 31 recognises two methods that
are acceptable:
The equity method approach treats the joint venture in the same way as an associate, i.e. the
investment in the joint venture is increased by the group share of the post acquisition profits of
the joint venture.
Proportionate Consolidation
This is a method of accounting whereby a venturer’s share of each of the assets, liabilities,
income and expenses
of a jointly controlled entity is combined, line by line, with similar items in the venturer’s financial
statements or reported as separate line items in the venturer’s financial statements.
Applying this method means that the balance sheet of the venturer includes its share of the
assets that it jointly controls and its share of the liabilities it is jointly responsible for.
The Statement of Comprehensive Income of the venturer will include its share of the income and
expenses.
• Any contingent liabilities the venturer has incurred in relation to its interests in joint ventures,
and its share of contingent liabilities incurred jointly with other venturers.
• Its share of the contingent liabilities of the joint ventures themselves for which it is
contingently liable.
• Those contingent liabilities arising because the venturer is contingently liable for the liabilities
of other venturers in the joint venture.
A venturer must disclose commitments in respect of the joint venture separately to other
commitments.
A venturer must disclose a listing and description of interests in significant joint ventures and the
proportion of ownership held in jointly controlled entities.
A venturer must also disclose the method it uses to account for its interest in jointly controlled
entities.
Example:
AGT, a medium-sized listed company, entered into an expansion programme on 1st October 20X7.
On that date the company purchased from BSH two investments in private limited companies:
Both investments were previously wholly owned by BSH. DBT was to be run by AGT and BSH
as a jointly controlled entity. AGT makes up its financial statements to 30th September each
year. The terms of the acquisitions were:
CDW
The total consideration was based on a price earnings (PE) multiple of 12 applied to the reported
profit of RWF2 million of CDW for the year to 30th September 20X7. The consideration was
settled by AGT issuing an 8% Loan Note for RWF14 million (at par) and the balance by a new
issue of RWF1 equity shares, based on a market value of RWF2.50 each.
DBT
The value of DBT at 1st October 20X7 was mutually agreed as RWF37.5 million. AGT satisfied
its share (50%)
of this amount by issuing 7.5 million RWF1 equity shares (market value RWF2.50 each) to BSH
Note: AGT has not recorded the acquisition of the above investments or the issuing of the
consideration. The summarised balance sheets of the three entities at 30th September 20X8 are:
• The book values of the net assets of CDW and DBT at the date of acquisition were considered
to be a reasonable approximation to their fair values.
• The retained profits of CDW and DBT for the year to 30th September 20X8 were RWF8
million and RWF2 million respectively. No dividends have been paid by any of the entities
during the year.
Required
(a) Prepare the journal entries (ignoring narratives) to record the acquisition of CDW and DBT in
the accounting records of AGT as at 1st October 20X7. Show your workings.
(b) Prepare the Consolidated Balance Sheet of AGT as at 30th September 20X8.
Solution
RWF14 m loan notes given. Thus, the balance of RWF10m satisfied Market value
by shares. of the
shares was RWF2.50. This means that 4 million shares were issued.
Therefore:
RWF’000 RWF’000
Dr Investment in CDW 24,000
Cr 8% Loan notes 14,000
Cr Equity shares 4,000
Cr Share premium 6,000
RWF’000 RWF’000
Dr Investment in DBT 18,750
Cr Share capital 7,500
Cr Share premium 11,250
(b) 1. Establish group structure
CDW DBT
Group 100% 50%
Non-Controlling Interest - -
Joint Venture 50%
Clearly, CDW is a subsidiary. DBT is being run as a joint venture and the
proportional consolidation method is required.
2. Adjustments
In this question there are no journal adjustments required, apart from the need to record
the investments, as seen above.
3. Calculate Goodwill
At date of At date of
Acquisition SFP
RWF’000 RWF’000
Share Capital 20,000 20,000
P/L reserves 7,000* 15,000
27,000 35,000
* 15,000 – 8,000
Cost of Investment 24,000
Less:
Share of Net assets Acquired (27,000 x 100%) 27,000
Negative Goodwill 3,000
At date of At date of
Acquisition SFP
RWF’000 RWF’000
Share Capital (50%) 12,500 12,500
P/L reserves 1,250* 2,250**
13,750 14,750
*(4,500 – 2,000) x 50%
**4,500 x 50%
Cost of Investment 18,750
Less:
Share of Net assets Acquired 13,750
Goodwill 5,000
The goodwill is not impaired and so will be shown at 5,000 in the Consolidated SFP
4.Calculate NCI
Not Applicable in this question
5. Calculate Consolidated Reserves
AGT
Per SFP 20,800
Negative Goodwill 3,000
23,800
CDW
Per SFP 15,000
At Acquisition 7,000
Post Acquisition 8,000
Group share x
100%
DBT
Per SFP (50%) 2,250
At Acquisition (50%) 1,250
Total 32,800
AGT Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as at 30th September 20X8
RWF’000 RWF’000
Assets
Non-current assets
Property Plant & Equipment 71,790
Goodwill 5,000
76,790
Current assets
Inventories 26,160
Trade and Other Receivables 18,570
Cash 3,430 48,160
124,950
Equity and Liabilities
Capital and Reserves
Equity capital 21,500
Share premium 17,250
Consolidated Accumulated Profit 32,800
71,550
Non-current liabilities
8% Loan notes 14,000
Current liabilities
Trade payables 29,440
Overdraft 1,540
Provision for Income Tax 8,420 39,400
124,950
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of the consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income is to present the results
of the parent company and the subsidiary as if it were a combined/single entity.
Example 1
H. Ltd owns 100% of S. Ltd acquired when the latter company had a reserves/profit and loss
balance of Nil.
The total column represents the consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income which is
presented thus:
Tax
(600)
Profit for period
900
One point to note at this stage is that the dividends in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive
Income represent those of the parent company only. The treatment of subsidiary’s dividends will
be dealt with in a later section.
B. NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST
If there is a Non-Controlling Interest in a subsidiary, give them their share of the profit after tax
of the subsidiary. The Non-Controlling Interest is shown below the consolidated Statement of
Comprehensive Income, alongside the share of profit attributable to the parent
Note the full profit before tax and tax of the subsidiary are consolidated.
Furthermore, if the Fair Value method is being used, then the NCI share of any goodwill impairment
must be deducted in arriving at the NCI amount in the consolidated Statement of Comprehensive
Income.
Example 2
Assume the same facts as before except H. Ltd. owns 80% of S. Ltd.
Columnar Workings H Ltd S Ltd Total
RWF RWF RWF
Profit before Tax 1,000 500 1,500
Tax (400) (200) (600)
600 300 900
Non-Controlling Interest 20% - (60) (60)
Movement on reserves:
Balance brought forward 700
Profit for period 840
Dividends Paid (100)
Balance carried forward RWF1,440
Example 3
H. Ltd acquired 100% of S. Ltd when the balance on the latter company’s reserves was Nil.
Movement in reserves:
Balance brought forward 1,100
Profit for period 900
Dividends Paid (100)
Example 5
Same facts as Example 4 except H. Ltd acquired its interest in S. Ltd when the latter company
had a profit and loss balance of RWF150.
Test
H. Ltd acquired 75% of S. Ltd when the latter company has a profit and loss balance of RWF100.
Statement of Comprehensive H Ltd S Ltd
Income RWF RWF
2,000 800
Profit before Tax
Tax (1,200) (300)
Solution
Columnar Workings H Ltd S Ltd Total
RWF RWF RWF
Profit before Tax 2,000 800 2,800
Tax (1,200) (300) (1,500)
This figure represents the parent company’s profit and loss balance of RWF1,600 plus group’s
The principle is to eliminate inter company profits and show assets at their cost to the group.
The elimination of profits or losses relating to intragroup transactions should be dealt with in
the Statement of Comprehensive Income of the company in which the profit/loss arose.
Example 6
H. Ltd sold goods to S. Ltd, which originally cost RWF500 at a profit of RWF80. Half of the
goods were in S.
Ltd’s inventory at the year end. H. Ltd owns 80% of S. Ltd.
H Ltd S Ltd
RWF RWF
1,000 500
Profit before Tax
Tax (400) (200)
600 300
Example 7
Assume the same facts as Example 6 except that S. Ltd sold the goods to H. Ltd. In this
instance the inventory profit is eliminated in the Statement of Comprehensive Income of S. Ltd.
Where non-current assets are sold by the parent company to the subsidiary or vice versa two
problems emerge
Example 8
One year ago H. Ltd sold a non-current asset to S. Ltd for RWF600 (original cost to H. Ltd
RWF500). S. Ltd
depreciates its non-current assets at 20% per annum. H. Ltd owns 80% of S. Ltd, balance at
acquisition Nil.
Statement of Comprehensive Income H Ltd S Ltd
RWF RWF
Profit before Tax 1,000 500
Tax (400) (200)
600 300
Balance brought forward 700 400
Balance carried forward RWF1,300 RWF700
E. DIVIDENDS
Introduction
Dividends received/receivable from the subsidiary which have been credited to the parent
company’s Statement
of Comprehensive Income should be eliminated in preparing the consolidated accounts.
The profits of the subsidiary, out of which the dividends have been appropriated, are being
consolidated; if the dividends were not eliminated a duplication would arise in the consolidated
accounts.
Example 9
H Ltd acquired 100% of S Ltd when the latter company had a reserves balance of Nil.
Statement of Comprehensive Income H Ltd S Ltd
RWF RWF
Profit before Tax 1,300 500
Tax (400) (200)
900 300
Dividends Paid (100) (300)
800
Nil Balance brought forward 700 400
Balance carried forward RWF1,500 RWF400
Correct Solution
In the incorrect solution above the dividend of RWF300 is included in H Ltd and thereby
leading to a duplication of this amount in the consolidated profit before tax
A second problem needs to be tackled in the above example; that is the composition of the
consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income retained balance of RWF1900. Simply put
Incorrect Solution
H Ltd S Ltd
In the incorrect solution above the dividend of RWF300 is included in H Ltd and thereby
leading to a duplication of this amount in the consolidated profit before tax
A second problem needs to be tackled in the above example; that is the composition of the
consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income retained balance of RWF1900. Simply put
how much of the RWF1900 is retained in the parent company’s Statement of Comprehensive
Income and the subsidiary profit and loss account?
The approach is to transfer group’s share of the subsidiary’s post acquisition dividend from
the subsidiary’s column to the parent company’s column leaving retained of RWF1,500 in the
holding company and RWF400 in the subsidiary.
Non-Controlling Interest
Example 10
Assume the same facts as Example 9 except that H Ltd owns 80 % of S Ltd
As you can see from example 10 group’s share of the dividend is eliminated from the profit
before tax workings and group’s share of the post acquisitions dividend is transferred from the
subsidiary to the parent company in computing the composition of the group retained profit.
Dividend Provided by Subsidiary not Credited to Profit and Loss by Parent Company
In this case no adjustment is required to the profits before tax as the dividend from the subsidiary
is not included
in the parent company’s profit before tax, however the transfer between the subsidiary and the
parent company is still required. A dividend provided by a subsidiary will ultimately be paid out
and increase the parent company’s reserves.
Example 11
H Ltd owns 75% of S Ltd. S Ltd provided a dividend of RWF200, which has not yet been taken
in by H Ltd.
*The minority is entitled to their share of the profit after tax before dividends. Dividends paid out/
provided by the subsidiary will affect the amount retained by the Non-Controlling Interest in the
Statement of Financial Position not their entitlement in the Statement of Comprehensive Income.
Preference Dividends
The same principles that relate to ordinary dividends are applied when there are preference
dividends except
watch the calculation of the Non-Controlling Interest.
Example 12
H Ltd acquired 80% of S Ltd when the latter company had a reserves balance of Nil. H Ltd owns
none of the
8% Preferential Share Capital of Nominal Value RWF500. H Ltd has not recorded its share of
dividends provided by S Ltd.
Columnar Workings
H Ltd Ltd
Working 1
F. TRANSFERS TO RESERVES
Group Share of transfers to reserves made by the subsidiary should be aggregated with the
parent company’s transfers to reserves.
RWF3,500 RWF1,300
Example 5 shows the situation where there was a pre-acquisition profit and loss account
balance of RWF150.
Example 15
H Ltd owns 80% of S Ltd. H Ltd sold goods which cost RWF500 to S Ltd for RWF600, half of
the goods are included in S Ltd year end inventory.
In this situation we introduce a further column into the Columnar Workings called an
adjustment column:-
• Aggregate the sales of H Ltd and S Ltd and adjust for the inter company sales,
• Aggregate the cost of sales of H Ltd and cost of sales of S Ltd and adjust for the inter
company sales.
I. DEBENTURE INTEREST
The amount of debenture interest charged in the consolidated Statement of Comprehensive
Income is that which has been paid to non-group debenture holders. Any inter company debenture
interest should cancel out.
Example 16
H Ltd owns 80% of the Ordinary Share Capital of S Ltd and 30% of the 15% debentures nominal
value
RWF1,000. The debenture interest of RWF150 has been accrued for in S Ltd but H Ltd has not
recorded its share of it yet.
In this case it is necessary to include in H Ltd the debenture interest receivable. When this
has been done the debenture interest receivable will cancel against the debenture interest
payable and leave the debenture interest payable to non group debenture holders charged in
the consolidated profit before tax.
Example 17
H Ltd acquired 80% of S Ltd half way through the year. The respective non-consolidated
Statement of
Comprehensive Incomes are set out below. Prepare the consolidated Statement of Comprehensive
Income.
Sales 1,300
Continuing
Acquisition 600
1,900
Cost of Sales (925)
Gross Profit 975
Administration (300)
Distribution (190)
Profit
Continuing 300
Acquisition 85
485
Interest (95)
Profit before Tax 390
Non-Controlling Interest 25
275
Movement in Reserves:
Retained reserves brought forward 400
Profit for period 250
Dividends (50)
Retained reserves carried forward 600
Under this method, the associate company’s revenue, cost of sales and expenses are not
consolidated with those of the investing group. Instead, the investor’s share of the profit after tax
of the associate is brought into the consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income. The
share of the associates profit is shown in the consolidated Statement of Comprehensive
Income before profit before tax.
This share of profit after tax will include any accounting adjustments that arise in the question in
relation to the associate, as well as any goodwill impairment that must be accounted for.
Example 1:
H Ltd acquired 80 % of S Ltd and 40% of A Ltd when both companies had reserves of RWFnil.
The Statement
of Comprehensive Incomes of each entity are as follows:
Requirement:
Prepare the consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.
Associate Company:
Share of profit after tax RWF120 x 40% = RWF48
Share of profit brought forward (RWF180 – 0) x 40% = RWF72
Sales X
Cost of Sales (X)
Gross Profit X
Administrative (X)
Expenses (X)
Distribution Costs
Group Profit 1,620
Interest Payable: (120)
1,500
Share of Profit in Associate 48
Movement in Reserves
Retained Reserves brought forward (see note) *1,872
Example 2
Using the same facts as Example 1 except H Ltd acquired 80% of S Ltd and 40% of A Ltd when
the latter
company’s’ reserves were RWF200 and RWF80 respectively, calculate the retained profits
brought forward at the start of the year.
Solution 2
In the consolidated statement of changes in equity, the investor’s share of the total recognised
gains and losses of its associates should be included , for example if there is a revaluation of
property in the associate, groups share of this should be included in statement of changes in
equity.
The investor’s assets used in calculating the goodwill arising should not include any goodwill
carried in the
Statement of Financial Position of the investee.
Example 3
H Ltd bought 40% of A Ltd for RWF260. The Statement of Financial Position of A Ltd at acquisition
was as follows:
Alternatively:
Goodwill 16
Comprehensive Example
H Ltd acquired 70% of S Ltd and 25% of A Ltd in January 20X2 when the companies had reserve
balances of
RWF1,000 and RWF160 respectively.
The Statement of Comprehensive Income and Statement of Financial Position of each entity for
31 December 20X4 are set out below.
Statement of Comprehensive Income H Ltd S Ltd A Ltd
RWF RWF RWF
Sales 18,000 10,970 5,190
Cost of Sales (7,200) (4,150) (2,090)
Gross Profit 10,800 6,820 3,120
Administration (3,100) (2,070) (1,070)
Distribution (2,400) (1,500) (850)
Profit 5,300 3,250 1,200
Investment Income 400 - -
Interest (300) (250) (200)
Profit before Tax 5,400 300 1,000
Tax (2,400) (800) (400)
Profit after Tax 3,000 2,200 600
7,000 4,700 2,000
Requirement:
Prepare a consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income and a consolidated Statement of
Financial Position for 31 December 20X4, using the proportion of net assets method.
RWF
Sales 28,970
Cost of sales (11,350)
Gross profit 17,620
Administration (5,170)
Distribution (3,900)
Profit 8,550
Interest (550)
Share of profit of Associate (see below) *150
Tax (3,200)
Profit for period 4,950
Attributable as follows:
Equity Holders in Parent 4,290
Non-Controlling Interest 660 4,950
Movement in Reserves:
Retained reserves brought forward (see below) **6,560
Profit for year 4,290
Dividend (800)
Retained reserves carried forward 10,050
(Note that the total of reserves in the Schedule of Movement in reserves is equal to the
Consolidated Reserves in the Statement of Financial Position below).
Non-Current Assets
Intangibles
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
RWF
Property Plant and Equipment (6,200 + 6,100) 12,300
Goodwill 650
14,060
Current assets 9,200
23,260
4,800 1,400
Goodwill 650
Associate
1,110
NCI on Consolidated SFP
30% x (6,000 + 4,700) = 3,210
Question:
PY Ltd acquired 70% of SW Ltd 3 years ago. Total Goodwill arising on acquisition was
RWF350,000. The Statement of Comprehensive Income of both companies are as follows:
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the Year Ended 31st March 2010
PY Ltd SW Ltd
RWF’000 RWF’000
1,000 260
Revenue
750 80
Cost of Sales
PY Ltd SW Ltd
RWF’000 RWF’000
Retained earnings b/f 1,575 770
Profit for the year 85 100
Dividends paid (60) (20)
Retained earnings c/f 1,600 850
Prepare the consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the year ended 31st March
2010, using the Fair Value Method.
Solution
PY Ltd GROUP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED
31ST MARCH 2010
RWF’000
Revenue (1,000 + 260 – 60) 1,200
Cost of sales (750 + 80 – 60 + 4 (inventory) + 2 776
(depreciation))
Gross Profit 424
Operating Expenses (65 + 35 + 35) (130)
Finance Costs (25 + 15) (40)
Investment Income (20 – (70% x 20)) 6
Goodwill Impaired:
30% x 350 = 105
1/3rd relates to current year, this 35 is the impaired amount for the current year.
NCI share of the impairment: 30% x 105 = 35
SW Ltd PAT
100
Less:
Depreciation (2)
Profit in inventory (4)
94
• Ratio analysis, cash flow analysis, and the preparation of reports thereon
INTRODUCTION
The ability to comprehend, assess, interpret and criticise the financial statements and related
information of different businesses is the quality above all others, which distinguishes the
accountant from the bookkeeper. Complete mastery of accounts can be gained only as a
result of wide experience, but whatever your personal circumstances, you can increase your
understanding by careful and systematic reading of the financial columns of the daily press and
by close attention to the professional journals.
Examination questions frequently call for appraisal of a specific document presented in the
question, perhaps a statement of financial position or statement of comprehensive income.
Students often find such a problem difficult, not because they lack the necessary knowledge but
because they are uncertain how to apply it. As a result, points are jotted down on the answer
paper as they are thought of and such answers are naturally badly arranged and displayed and
fail to exhibit any logical process of order and reasoning.
The object of this study unit is to show you the method which must underlie all good reports and
appraisals, and the way in which they should be drafted.
• Published accounts, i.e. those prepared for the information of shareholders, etc.
• Internal accounts, i.e. those prepared for the information of the directors and management.
The second type, being the accounts upon which the policy of the concern is based are usually
in much greater detail than the first.
In either case, greater reliance can be placed on accounts which have been audited by a
professional firm of standing than on any others; in particular, accounts drawn up by a trader
himself are always open to question.
Analysis of accounts (meaning final accounts) does not, therefore, include any other accounts
which may appear in the books. It is not an audit of the books or an investigation into the way in
which the books have been kept. So long as the statement of financial position and accounts are
genuine, it does not matter whether the books have been well or badly kept.
Purpose of Analysis
The primary object of analysis of accounts is to provide information. Analysis which does not
serve this purpose is useless.
The position of the ultimate recipient of the information must be especially noted. Suppose you
are asked by a debenture holder to comment on the Statement of Financial Position of a company
in which he is interested. It should be a waste of time to report at length on any legal defects
revealed in the Statement of Financial Position. You would naturally pay attention to points which
particularly concern the debenture holder, e.g. the security for his loan to the company, and the
extent to which his interest in the debentures is ‘covered’ by the annual profits. This does not
mean that legal defects should be ignored. It is very important that they should be mentioned
(although briefly), for failure to comply with legal requirements may be indicative of more
serious shortcomings, possibly detrimental to the security of the debenture holder.
This matter of approach is vital to the task of analysis. We shall now consider certain special
matters in which various parties will be particularly interested. For the sake of illustration, we will
deal with their positions in relation to the accounts for a limited company, but many of the points
we are going to mention are relevant to the accounts of a sole trader or partnership.
B. INTERESTED PARTIES
Debenture Holders
These are interested in both the long- and short-term position of the company. In the long term
they are
interested in the company’s ability to repay the sums lent by them (assuming they are redeemable).
They would look to see whether a sinking fund has been created, and for the realisable value of
the assets which form security for their loans. The basis of valuation of assets would therefore
be important, and whether the depreciation provision is adequate.
In the short term the debenture holder will consider the company’s ability to pay the loan interest
and hence will examine the working capital (current assets less current liabilities).
Trade Payables
As a general rule, a trade creditor will rely on trade references or personal knowledge when
forming an opinion
on the advisability of granting or extending credit to a company. He is not often concerned with
the accounts, which he rarely sees, but if he does examine the accounts he will be as much
concerned with existing liabilities as with assets. In particular, he will note the following:
• Working capital position or ability of company to pay debts when they fall due.
• Ease with which current assets can be converted into cash.
• Prior claims to company’s assets in the event of a liquidation, i.e. secured loans or overdrafts.
• Earnings record and expansion programme.
Shareholders
The average shareholder is interested in the future dividends he will receive. Future profits are
of secondary
importance, so long as they are adequate to provide the dividend.
Past dividends provide the basis on which future dividends may be estimated, just as past profits
afford a similar indication as to future profits. Estimates may, however, be upset because of
radical changes in the nature of trade, production methods, general economic conditions, etc.
If the shares are listed on a stock exchange, it will be found that the market price varies more or
less directly with the dividends declared. It is generally accepted that a company ought not to
pay out more than two-thirds of its distributable profits each year in the form of dividend.
Cover is a vital factor in respect of any shares carrying fixed dividend rights, e.g. preference
shares. The coefficient of cover is determined by dividing the annual dividend into the amount
of the annual profits.
With redeemable shares, attention will be paid to the ability of the company to redeem on the due
dates. There may be a sinking fund created for this purpose.
Overall, the shareholder would be concerned with whether the company still provides the best
home for his investment or whether his money would be better utilised elsewhere.
C. PROFITABILITY RATIOS
Control of all costs, direct and indirect, is essential if profit is to be maximised. In a broad and
general fashion, excluding the advanced techniques of budgetary control and cost accounting, it
is possible to watch total costs of each type, and to take action to reduce them when necessary.
This may be done by comparing manufacturing costs, administration costs, and selling and
distribution costs with profit (gross or net) or with sales. The broad headings, manufacturing
costs, etc. can, of course, be usefully analysed into their constituent parts and similar comparison
made with profit or sales. The trend of the ratio - whether there has been an increase or decrease
in costs as compared with profit or sales - is the significant factor.
Like so many aspects of ratio analysis, these figures can only provide a rough measure and care
must be taken not to read too much into each. Consider the following example:
Notice that to leave the matter with only totals would have ignored important underlying factors.
Product A has increased its profit margin but Product B has become less efficient, despite
increased sales.
The same sort of distorting factors can be seen in a situation where any final, total figures are
made up of different products each having a different margin of profit. This is called the product
mix and means that a total profit margin can change, even if efficiency has remained the same,
because there has been a change in the proportion of sales taken by component products. You
can see this important point illustrated in the following example:
Year 1 Year 2
RWF RWF
Sales Sales
Product X 30,000 Product X 70,000
Product Y 60,000 Product Y 220,000
90,000 290,000
Profit margins for X and Y for both years are 7% and 15% respectively.
Year 1 Year 2
RWF RWF
X Profit 2,100 X Profit 4,900
Y Profit 9,000 Y Profit 33,000
Although margins have increased from 12.3% to 13.1% the company has not become any more
efficient. The reason for the better figures in Year 2 is because product Y, with a much better
margin of profit, has taken up a much larger share of total sales than has product X.
Even this illustration is itself an oversimplification and you must always approach profit margins
with caution. For instance, it is important to think about accounting policies. An example would
be the treatment of development expenditure, which can be capitalised and amortised, provided
the criteria in IAS 38 are met.
There is no easy answer to these questions and again the wisest approach will be one of caution.
Generally, however, total funds or total assets will be favoured since investors expect all resources
to be used. In any case, all resources have an opportunity cost, i.e. alternative uses.
(a) Definition
Current assets are compared with current liabilities. Generally speaking, the larger the former in
relation to the latter the more financially stable is the business. As a very general rule, total current
assets should be at least twice total current liabilities.
The length of time an asset is held or a liability is outstanding determines the category into which
it falls, i.e. whether current or non-current. If an asset is to be held for up to a year, not longer, or
a liability is to be paid off within a year, then one is a current asset and the other a current liability.
Non-current assets or ‘non-current” liabilities, e.g. loan capital, are of a permanent nature.
From the information given, therefore, it would appear that the current ratio is quite satisfactory.
The following points should, however, receive attention before any conclusion is reached:
(i) The type of trade carried on by the business. In particular, trade fluctuations, owing to
seasonality of sales of the product and the like, are extremely important. If the selling season
is a number of months away, the inventory carried may build up considerably (giving a larger
total of current assets) and yet, for all practical purposes, from the point of view of liquid
resources the position will have deteriorated.
(ii) Having regard to what is stated in (i), you will see that it is not the total ratio which is of
importance but rather the composition of the total assets and total liabilities. Referring to the
figures in the example, we may ask:
Once an ideal ratio for the business has been established, the most important point, from a financial
point of view, is to ascertain whether there is a rise or fall, for, generally speaking, the former may
be regarded as a favourable trend and the latter an unfavourable one. Again, no hard and fast rule
is possible for much depends upon the circumstances.
Next, after a time, the length of which depends upon the production and sales cycles, extra
revenue from sales is received. Often a number of months will have elapsed before this extra
cash is received. There has, however, been immediate payment of wages and salaries and
only a limited period of credit will normally be allowed by payables. Possibly a bank overdraft
will be obtained to accommodate immediate needs. If not, or when the limit of the overdraft is
reached, an anxious creditor may apply for a petition, and the business may then be forced into
bankruptcy or liquidation.
Even if a business does manage to survive, it will not, for a considerable period, be able to take
advantage of a new market, the development of new ideas or a similar project. There is thus a
second danger of being forced out of business, this being brought about by the competition of
more progressive rival concerns.
In the circumstances outlined, only the availability of cash can avert the dangers. This is thus of
the greatest possible importance to any business; without cash it is unlikely to survive. Stocks
form part of the working capital and these, in the short term, are of limited value. It may be
possible to attract cash customers by giving a discount, but this will mean that less profit is
earned.
Because of the importance of paying payables promptly, it is advisable to fix a period of time
within which accounts have to be settled. Following normal commercial practice, this may be
taken as one month. If the business cannot meet its obligations within each month, then that is a
danger sign, which indicates that prompt remedial action should be taken. The next ratio greatly
assists in maintaining adequate cash or near cash resources.
It is advantageous to keep this ratio in balance, as during the normal course of business events
revenue from receivables will usually be required to pay payables. This helps to maintain stocks
at a stable level and profits earned can be used to increase liquid resources.
If the liabilities are to be met, the ratio must clearly be at least 1 to 1, i.e. liquid assets must
be equal to payables. Any falling short indicates that additional cash has to be obtained. The
trend of the ratio will be a very helpful guide, for under stable trading conditions it should remain
steady, without appreciable movement either way. A sharp fall in the liquid assets available
without a similar fall in payables will show that immediate action is necessary.
We’ve already explained the term ‘current assets’. Non-current assets are properties, machines,
equipment and other possessions held in the business permanently for the purpose of earning
profit. Examples are land and buildings, plant and machinery, office furniture and machinery,
motor vehicles and loose tools. The significant fact to remember is that these assets are not held
in the normal course of business, but are retained so that materials may be converted to finished
goods and the latter then sold.
The two are compared to give the ratio of shareholders’ to payables’ equity. A strong business
will have the largest proportion of its total liabilities composed of the net worth. Weaker concerns
are those which are dependent upon payables and thus any adverse interference from them
may lead to serious consequences. The strong company is fully ruled by shareholders without
interference from payables.
It is very important to remember that money owed by receivables is company money that has
alternative uses. Of course normal commercial courtesy demands that some time be
given to pay, but any unreasonable time means one company’s rightful funds in another
company’s bank account.
(b) Payables
The same reasoning applies here - the higher the payables figure, the higher the temporary
liquidity. For other reasons, however, too high a figure may mean danger. The calculation for
this is:
Payables (end of year)
x 365
Purchasers
This gives the number of days the company is being allowed to pay its payables.
This percentage can be measured against previous levels and comparisons can be made
with other firms and departments.
Of course there is rarely one Statement of Financial Position item called ‘inventory and you will have
to deal with the different types of inventory - raw materials, work in progress, finished goods
Introduction
In addition to the management ratios, investors frequently need to assess the merits of particular
investments.
The following ratios are commonly used, and can be illustrated by using the summarised accounts
of a limited company which follow.
Current Assets:
Inventory 71,000
Accounts receivables 164,000
Cash at bank and in hand 5,000
240,000
420,000
Capital and Reserves:
Called up Share Capital:
30,000 RWF1
Preference Shares 30,000
600,000
Ordinary 25rwf Shares 150,000
180,000
General Reserve 79,000
Profit and Loss 63,000
142,000
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable 65,000
Proposed dividends 33,000
98,000
420,000
We will use these summarised accounts as the basis for illustrating the investment ratios.
Dividend Yield
This is the actual dividend payable for a year, including both interim and final, expressed as a
percentage of the
quoted share price. It is calculated as:
Dividend paid
x 100 = Dividend yield
Quoted share price x No. of Shares
30,000
(b) = 8.3% approximately
(RWF0.60 x 600,000)
The dividend yield is a measure of the income return on an investment, and ignores retained
profits. Normally, the higher the dividend yield on ordinary shares, the greater the risk, though
this is not always true. Preference shares tend to have a higher dividend yield than ordinary
shares, mainly to offset the fact that there is little scope for capital appreciation.
Dividend Cover
This ratio represents the extent to which the distributable profits compare with the
dividend payable.
Distributable profits represent the profits after corporation tax and any other appropriations have
been deducted. It is calculated in the following way:
Distributable profits
= Dividend cover
Dividend
In our example this will be:
(a) Preference Shares
75,000
= 25.0 times covered
3,000
RWF
Profits after taxation 75,000
Less Preference dividend 3,000
Available for ordinary shares 72,000
Earnings Yield
This is the profits available for distribution to the ordinary shareholders, expressed as a
percentage of the quoted market value of the ordinary share capital. It is computed as follows:
Distributable profits (less Preference dividends)
x 100 = Earnings yield
Number of ordinary shares x Market value
The earnings yield can also be expressed as earnings per ordinary share, which is the distributable
profit earned on one share. This is:
The P/E ratio is significant insofar as it establishes the number of years it will take for the capital
invested to be repaid out of earnings. In our example it will be:
0.60
= 5 times
0.12
It will therefore take 5 years, in this case, to recover from dividends the sum of money originally
invested. It can be compared with the payback period of assessing a capital product. Similar to
the dividend yield, the P/E ratio can be an indicator of risk; in this case, the higher the rate the
lower the risk, though this is not an absolute rule.
• The date to which the accounts are drawn up. Accurate information can only be obtained from
up-to-date figures. Seasonal trends should not be forgotten, as at the end of the peak season
the business presents the best picture of its affairs.
• The position as shown by the Statement of Financial Position. The arrangement of certain
matters can be misleading and present a more favourable position, i.e. making the effort to
collect debts just before the year-end in order to show more cash and lower receivables than
is usual; ordering goods to be delivered just after the year-end so that stocks and payables
can be kept as low as possible.
• Management interim accounts should be examined wherever possible to obtain a clearer idea
of trends.
• Comparison with similar businesses should also be made.
• Debenture holders (who have first claim on money from a company in the event of a
winding-up)
• Payables (who are unsecured but can sue for their debts)
• Most Risk
Ordinary shareholders, who are only repaid in the event of a liquidation, when the least-risk group
has been fully repaid.
Gearing is the relationship of ordinary shareholders’ funds (sometimes called equity interest) to
preference shares and debentures (called fixed-return capital).
If a company is low-geared it means that the proportion of preference shares and debentures is
low compared with ordinary shares. Hence the preference shareholders and debenture holders
have greater security for payment of dividends/loan interest and the ordinary shareholders are
not liable to such violent changes in return on their investment, as there is less to pay before they
receive their entitlement.
High gearing, on the other hand, means a high proportion of preference shareholders and debenture
holders to ordinary shareholders. Here there is greater risk for the ordinary shareholders as a
greater proportion of the profits is to be paid out to a fixed return capital, before they receive their
entitlement.
Question
The following are financial statements provided by EPL Associates Inc, an American company:
Yr 2 Yr 3
RWF RWF
Net worth:
Preference shares 4,000 4,000
Ordinary shares 26,000 28,000
Capital surplus 5,000 10,000
Earned surplus 116,000 159,251
151,000 201,251
335,500 424,500
EPLAssociates Inc is seeking additional finance, which your company is considering providing. You are
required:
• Using ratio analysis, to advise your company (in report format); and
• To state, with reasons, what additional statements you would ask for.
(a) Report
To: From: Board of Directors
Purpose: A. Student
To assess the advisability of providing finance to
EPL Associates Inc.
The following points arise from an examination of the financial statements provided by the
American company.
Turning to return on capital employed, the earnings before tax against net worth is 56.9% for Yr
3, an increase of 9.2% over the prior year.
The return is based on an assessment of non-current assets, which are presumably stated at
historic cost, as being fairly aged (this being indicated by depreciation being some 75% of cost).
Year 2 Year 3
Current ratio 0.85:1 1.3:1
Liquidity ratio 0.40:1 0.71:1
Looking at the constituents of working capital, the stock turnover does appear to have increased
a little but, without knowledge of the finished stock figures, this is impossible to tell with any
accuracy.
Receivables again cannot be accurately calculated as the sales trend over Yr 3 is unknown. It
appears that they are taking a little longer credit, though.
Trade suppliers’ credit has doubled and therefore does indicate a lengthening period of credit
taken.
Summary
More information is needed, as shown below, before any recommendation can be made. What
I can say
though is that trading seems to be well managed, with a substantial increase having been
possible without any large reduction in margins or any great increase in the value of stock and
receivables.
Non-current assets need replacing, which is presumably behind the request for finance. The
368 I1.2 FINANCIAL REPORTING CPA EXAMINATION
STUDY MANUAL
company has a reserve of RWF65,000 for this purpose - and accumulated depreciation - but
these reserves and provisions are not in an immediately liquid form. Indeed, liquidity is low and
no indication is made as to whether payables are pressing.
There is likely also to be pressure from shareholders for increased dividends, the present level
being covered almost four times by available earnings.
Yr 2 Yr 3 Movement
RWF’000 % RWF’000 % %
Net sales 1,070.00 100.00 1,565.00 100.00 46
Year 3
151,365
x 100 = 56.9%
266,251
9.2% increase
Working Capital
(i) Current ratio
Current assets: Current liabilities, bills and provisions
Yr 2 Yr 3 Movement
0.85:1 1.3:1 Increase 0.45 times
Yr 2 Yr 3
Movement
Times turned over 14.02 14.41
Increase 0.39 times
Yr 2 Yr 3
Movement
RWF52,500 x 52 RWF95,0 = 2.5 weeks
1,070,000
RWF52,000 x 52 = 3.15 weeks
1,565,000
Increase 0.65 weeks
It should be noted that legal ownership of the goods rests with the consignor until the goods are
sold. Any stock which remains unsold at the Reporting Date should be included in the inventory
figures for the consignor and not the consignee.
• The Consignment Account: this is basically the profit and loss account for the
consignment transaction. Income received from selling the goods will be recorded here and
any expenses will be offset against it. The balance is obviously the profit or loss on the
transaction and will be transferred to the Statement of Consolidated Income.
• The Consignee account: this is the debtor or creditor account for the consignee. This will
show either any monies that the consignee is due to pay over to the consignor or vice-versa.
The former situation is more likely, especially if the consignee deducts their costs from the
proceeds before paying the net amount over to the consignor.
• The Consignment Inventory account: these are where all movements of stock are recorded.
When items are transferred from ‘normal’ inventory to that despatched on consignment then
the double entry will be to credit the ‘normal’ inventory and debit
• ‘consignment inventory’.
Arrangements will need to be made for regular stock-checks on the consignee’s premises,
especially around the Reporting Date. Any agreement should clearly specify who is to be
responsible for any losses in inventory due to misplacing them, theft or damage. It should also be
clear who is responsible for insuring the items involved. Any bad debts however would normally
be the responsibility of the consignor. However in some cases a special (del credere) commission
may be paid to the consignee, in which case they will be responsible for accounting for the bad
debt and picking up any corresponding loss.
At the end of the period, the unsold consignment inventory value should be carried forward to the
next accounting period in the books of the consignor as in any other form of inventory. However,
in line with the accounting rules on inventory (IAS 2 in the private sector, IPSAS
12 is the public sector accruals-based equivalent) all costs incurred in bringing that inventory to its
present location and condition can be included in the valuation of inventory including consignee’s
expenses, provided that the over-arching rule about inventory being shown as the lower of cost
or Net Realisable Value (NRV) is complied with. Note however that marketing costs incurred by
the consignee cannot be included.
Example:
A book publisher sends 100 books worth 500,000 RwF to a shop on a sale or return basis. Their
original cost was 300,000. The shop has sold 60 of them by the end of the year, all at the agreed
selling price. Of the remaining 40, 10 are damaged and of no value – it has been agreed that the
consignor will bear the risk of any damage. The shop is paid a commission of
10% of any book sold.
• - Sale of goods:
• - Inventory write-off:
At the reporting date, the relevant accounts would show (assuming that the consignee has not
paid any money over) the following:
Consignment Inventory
Sales 300,000
This amount would remain as a debtor (receivable) until paid. The consignee would have a
consignor account which mirrors this, showing a creditor (payable) of 270,000 RwF until paid.
When payment is made the consignor account would be debited with 270,000 RwF and the bank
account credited with the same amount.
There are also sound organisational reasons why banking tends to have high quality financial
statements, in many countries providing best practice in financial statements. The financial
statements for one thing are especially important and investors and other stakeholders will want
reassurance that the bank in question is organised on a sound financial footing; a situation of
course that has become more obviously important in the past few years with the serious financial
problems that have faced many banks.
Banks also tend to be able to attract top quality accounting staff through the relative attractiveness
of salaries and other benefits that they are able to offer. They are also, if they are part of a
multinational banking group, likely to be subject to strong internal audit reviews from the banks
that they are part of. They will also be subject to a greater degree of external regulation than
many other bodies. All of these reasons tend to drive up the quality of financial statements in
banks – though the recent problems faced globally by the industry suggest that even here there
is in some instances much room for improvement.
The National Bank of Rwanda (BNR) regulates financial reporting by banks and non-bank financial
institutions and issues accounting instructions governing the treatment of specific transactions—
e.g. provisions for non-performing loans. In the exercise of powers conferred to it by its statutes,
the Banking Act, and other legal provisions, the National Bank of Rwanda is empowered to enact
regulations, issue instructions, and take decisions that banks, insurance companies, and other
financial institutions must comply with if they wish to do business.
The accounting and auditing requirements, as outlined in the Banking Act, are in addition to those
set by the Companies Act. The National Bank of Rwanda requires these institutions to designate
at least one external auditor chosen from a list that it prepares on a regular basis. External
auditors of banks are required to follow the generally prevailing standards of their profession
coupled with the regulations, instructions, and decisions of the Central Bank. The term of an
auditor’s mandate is three years, renewable only once.
Compliance with IFRS requirements is a pre-requisite for banks. However, there are
additional financial requirements that the banks are required to meet. The ROSC Report noted
that the banking and financial institutions were the only ones to have an accounting and reporting
framework in Rwanda in 2008 but were not fully in compliance with IFRS in practice. The Report
found that “most banks’ accounting treatment for investments in treasury bills and long-term
government stocks does not comply with determination of impairment, specifically in relation to
the impairment of loans and advances, under IAS 39.
For this reason, banks in Rwanda, along with many other countries, are required to maintain
prudent ratios of capital funds to ensure that they can meet repayment demands and by so doing
maintain confidence in the economy and amongst investors. Such regulations are called
‘prudential’ requirements and the BNR Department of Banking Supervision is responsible for
monitoring compliance with these requirements.
D. INSURANCE COMPANIES
There are no specific legal regulations applying to insurance companies. However they are
required to once more comply with IFRS requirements in their accounting and reporting practices.
The BNR Department of Supervision of Non-Banking Institutions is responsible for monitoring
The liquidator will normally have a duty to ascertain whether any misconduct has been conducted
by those in control of the company which has caused prejudice to the general body of creditors.
In some legal systems, the liquidator may be able to bring an action against errant directors or
shadow directors for either wrongful trading or fraudulent trading.
The liquidator must determine the company’s title to property to enforce their claims against the
assets of the company to the extent that they are subject to a valid security interest. In most
legal systems, only fixed security takes precedence over all claims, security by way of floating
charge may be postponed to the preferential creditors.
Priority of Claims on the company’s assets will be determined in the following order:-
• Liquidators Costs
• Creditors with fixed charge over assets
• Costs incurred by an administrator
• Amounts owing to employees for wages/superannuation
• Payments owing in respect of workers injuries
• Amounts owing to employees for leave
• Retrenchment payments owing to employees
• Creditors with floating charge over assets
• Creditors with security over assets
• Shareholders
Having wound up the company’s affairs, the liquidator must call a final meeting of the members,
creditors or both. The liquidator is then usually required to send final accounts to the Registrar
and to notify the court. The company is then dissolved.
In Rwanda please refer to website: Codes of Laws of Rwanda, Law no 08/2002 of 05/02/2002
relating to Regulations Governing Banks and other Financial Institutions.
• Inscribe after the company’s name, the words – IN LIQUIDATION and not act as a bank or a
financial institution except with a clear mention that it is under liquidation
• Immediately stop its operations except those strictly necessary for its liquidation
The Central bank will supervise the bank or financial institution during the liquidation process.
The Central Bank receives copies of all documents and letters relating to liquidation. The legal
status of the bank or financial institution under liquidation remains unaltered till its closure.
In every liquidation of a bank or financial institution the realization of all assets’ and any eventual
guarantees (Article 53 paragraph 2), minus expenses linked to the liquidation shall be distributed
to the various categories of creditors as follows:-
• Guarantee holders up to the value of their guarantees
• Depositors
• The State
• Other Certified Creditors
The Court may authorize the liquidator to affix seals on properties of administrators and managers
whose responsibility seems to be involved in accordance with Article 65.
Forced liquidation is pronounced by Court after distribution of the remainder and approval of the
liquidator’s accounts.
Bankruptcies
Bankruptcy is a legal status of a HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insolvent” n
insolvent person or an organisation, that is, one who cannot repay the debts they owe to
HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creditors” creditors. In most jurisdictions bankruptcy
is imposed by a court order, often initiated by the debtor.
Bankruptcy is not the only legal status that an insolvent person or organisation may have, and
the term bankruptcy is therefore not the same a HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Insolvency” s insolvency. In some countries, including the HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.
org/wiki/United_Kingdom” United Kingdom, bankruptcy is limited to individuals, and other
forms of insolvency proceedings, for example HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Liquidation” , liquidation a HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Administration_
(law)” nd administration are applied to companies. In the United States the term bankruptcy is
applied more broadly to formal insolvency proceedings.
If enough time passes, seven years in most jurisdictions, the debt is removed from the debtor’
HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credit_history” s credit history.
F. IPSAS
Presentation of Financial Statements - IPSAS 1
IPSAS 1 (“Presentation of Financial Statements”) gives general guidance as to the types of
financial statements to be prepared in the public sector (along with IPSAS 2 on the cash flow
statement). It is drawn primarily from IAS 1. It should be applied to all general purpose financial
statements prepared and presented under the accrual basis of accounting in accordance
with IPSASs. In common with most IPSASs, it applies to all public sector entities other than
Government Business Enterprises which use IFRSs for their financial reporting.
It outlines that there are six basic components of financial statements namely a Statement of
Financial Position, a Statement of Financial Performance, a statement of changes in net assets/
equity, a cash flow statement, a comparison of budget and actual amounts (only if the budget is
made publicly available) and the notes to the financial statements. It is important to emphasise
that the disclosures in the notes are considered a fundamental part of the financial statements
– but detailed guidelines on what should go into the notes for specific elements of the financial
statements are found in individual IPSASs on the topics involved and not in IPSAS 1, which sets
out high level contents only.
Many of these financial statements are similar to those in use within the private sector. One
important difference however is the comparison of budget and actual amounts. This reflects the
fact that in the public sector the budget has a greater and different significance than it does in the
private sector. In particular it is a tool to help ensure accountability of those responsible for the
control of resources and their effective, efficient and economic use. IPSAS 1 does not give
detailed guidance on the budget v actual comparison statement which is covered in more detail
within IPSAS 24, “Presentation of Budget Information in Financial Statements” (this is one of the
few IPSASs for which there is no equivalent IFRS).
Entities are encouraged to present other information than that included in the financial statements
to assist users in assessing the performance of the entity, its stewardship of assets and making
an informed evaluation about decisions on the allocation of resources. Such information might
include performance indicators, statements of service performance, program reviews and
other reports by management. These areas will be further covered in the “Conceptual Framework”
which is currently being prepared by IFAC to provide a framework within which future IPSASs will
be prepared and current IPSASs possibly revised.
An entity whose financial statements comply with IPSASs shall make an explicit and unreserved
statement of such compliance in the notes. Financial statements shall not be described as
complying with IPSASs unless they comply with all the requirements of IPSASs
– in other words selective application of IPSASs is not permitted.
In addition to the over-arching consideration of ‘fair presentation’ other important concepts are
included, for example;
• that the financial statements are prepared on the basis that the entity is a ‘going concern’
• that there is in normal circumstances consistency of presentation from one reporting period to
the next
• the concept of materiality and aggregation of large numbers of transactions into classes for
reporting purposes
• that the offsetting of assets and liabilities, or revenue and expenses, is not permitted unless
specifically allowed or required by an IPSAS
• that comparative information for previous periods will be included in the financial statements
unless an IPSAS allows or requires its non-inclusion (e.g. in the first reporting period for a new
entity)
Much of the detailed guidance in IPSAS 1 replicates that found in IAS 1 and is therefore not
replicated here. The main differences between the two are shown below:
• Commentary additional to that in IAS 1 has been included in IPSAS 1 to clarify the applicability
of the Standard to accounting by public sector entities, e.g., discussion on the application of the
going concern concept has been expanded.
• IAS 1 allows the presentation of either a statement showing all changes in net assets/
equity, or a statement showing changes in net assets/equity, other than those arising from
capital transactions with owners and distributions to owners in their capacity as owners. IPSAS
1 requires the presentation of a statement showing all changes in net assets/equity.
• IPSAS 1 uses different terminology, in certain instances, from IAS 1. The most significant
examples are the use of the terms “statement of financial performance,” and “net assets/equity”
in IPSAS 1. The equivalent terms in IAS 1 are “income statement,” and “equity”.
• IPSAS 1 does not use the term “income,” which in IAS 1 has a broader meaning than the term
“revenue.”
• IPSAS 1 contains commentary on timeliness of financial statements, because of the lack of
an equivalent Framework in IPSASs (paragraph 69). However this may be revised once the
Conceptual Framework is finalised.
• IPSAS 1 contains an authoritative summary of qualitative characteristics (based on the IASB
framework) in Appendix A. Again, this may be revised once the Conceptual Framework is
finalised.
In practice, there are no significant differences between IPSAS 2 and IAS 7. However there are
some differences in the detail, namely:
• Commentary additional to that in IAS 7 has been included in IPSAS 2 to clarify the applicability
of the standards to accounting by public sector entities. IPSAS 2 uses different
terminology, in certain instances, from IAS 7. The most significant examples are the use of the
terms “revenue,” “statement of financial performance,” and “net assets/equity” in IPSAS 2. The
equivalent terms in IAS 7 are “income,” “income statement,” and “equity.”
• IPSAS 2 contains a different set of definitions of technical terms from IAS 7 (paragraph8).
• n common with IAS 7, IPSAS 2 allows either the direct or indirect method to be used to
present cash flows from operating activities. Where the direct method is used to present cash
flows from operating activities, IPSAS 2 encourages disclosure of a reconciliation of surplus
or deficit to operating cash flows in the notes to the financial statements (paragraph
29).
Inventories - IPSAS 12
IPSAS 12 (“Inventories”) is drawn substantially from IAS 2. As the name suggests, its objective
is to prescribe the accounting treatment for inventories. Specifically it provides guidance on the
calculation of cost and the subsequent recognition of inventories as expenses when they are
consumed or sold. They also provide guidance on the write-down of inventories to their Net
Realisable Value (in the case of inventories held for re-sale, defined as the future sales proceeds
of any inventory less any future costs that would be incurred to make that sale happen).
The IPSAS outlines a number of situations where the rules outlined do not apply, for
example:
• Work-in-progress on construction contracts (specific rules are in IPSAS 11)
• Financial instruments (see IPSASs 28 and 29)
• Biological assets (IPSAS 27)
The basic rule, as it is in IAS 2, is that inventories should be carried in the Statement of
Financial Position (sometimes known as the Balance Sheet) until it is used or sold, at which
point the inventory will be charged to the Statement of Financial Performance. The
accounting is quite simple as the following example shows:
Entity X, a public sector education establishment buys 20,000,000 RwF of fuel oil in
December 2012, which it does not plan to use until 2013:
In the financial statements, the double entry for this transaction (assuming it is paid for in cash
when purchased is):
Inventories in the public sector may take a number of different forms, some of them quite
unusual. These include:
• Ammunition
• Consumable stores
• Maintenance materials
• Energy reserves
• Stocks of unissued currency
The cost of inventories shall comprise all costs of purchase, costs of conversion, and other costs
incurred in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition. Costs of purchase
includes any non-reclaimable taxes and import duties. If there are any conversion costs, such as
would be the case with a publicly-owned manufacturing environment which takes raw materials
and turns them into finished goods then any attributable overheads may also be added to the
cost as long as these overhead costs are allocated in a systematic fashion.
The accounting treatment in IPSAS 12 is similar to that in IAS 2. Basically, when inventories are
sold, exchanged, or distributed, the carrying amount of those inventories shall be recognized
as an expense in the period in which the related revenue is recognized. If there is no related
revenue, the expense is recognized when the goods are distributed or the related service is
rendered.
There are only a few differences between IPSAS 12 and IAS 2. IPSAS 12 requires that where
inventories are provided at no charge or for a nominal charge, they are to be valued at the lower
of cost and current replacement cost (in the public sector it is not as unusual for inventories to
move from one organisation to another on a free-of-charge basis as it is in the private sector).
In addition the financial statement known as the ‘Statement of Financial Performance’ is known
as the ‘Income Statement’ in IAS 2, which also uses the term
‘income’ rather than ‘revenue’.
It should be noted that one of the allowable reasons for changing an accounting policy is the
publication of a new IPSAS. Entities will always have a transition period during which they may
move from the existing accounting treatment to that which is required by the new IPSAS. On
the other hand the management of the entity may feel that a different policy is required because
of changes that have taken place within the entity itself. Changes of accounting policy, which
usually require restatement of comparative figures and opening balances should not be confused
with changes in accounting estimate, which do not.
Estimates may often be used in government accounting for example estimated amounts of tax
revenues, estimated bad debt provisions for uncollected debts or the obsolescence of
inventory. When these estimates turn out to be in need of correction – and remember that an
estimate is almost certain to be incorrect to some extent because the outcome is uncertain.
These estimates should be corrected in the current financial period and not previous ones.
Once more the major differences between IPSAS 3 and IAS 8 mainly revolve around terminology.
IPSAS 3 uses the terms ‘Statement of Financial Performance’, accumulated surplus or deficit
and net assets/equity whereas in IAS 8 these are termed ‘income statement’,
‘retained earnings’ and ‘equity’. Also IPSAS 3 talks of ‘revenue’, which is called ‘income’ in
IAS 8. In addition, unlike IAS 8 IPSAS 3 does not require disclosures about earnings per share,
which are not normally relevant in a public sector context.
Events after the reporting date - IPSAS 14
IPSAS 14, “Events after the reporting date”, is drawn from IAS 10, “Events after the balance
sheet date”. Its objective is to prescribe;
• When an entity should adjust its financial statements for events after the reporting date; and
• The disclosures that an entity should give about the date when the financial statements were
authorized for issue, and about events after the reporting date.
Events after the reporting date may be analysed into adjusting and non-adjusting in nature.
Adjusting events occur when information is received after the reporting date which gives more
evidence about a condition that already existed at the reporting date. One example would be
when a court case has been commenced against the entity where, say, a provision of
30,000,000 RwF has been established. If the court case is decided after the reporting date but
before the financial statements are organised and the court finds that the entity is liable to make
payments of 40,000,000 RwF then the financial statements should be adjusted accordingly.
Non-adjusting events are those which occur after the reporting date and, although significant, do
not normally give evidence of a condition existing at the balance sheet date. Examples given by
IPSAS 14 include a major fire after the reporting date that destroys a substantial asset, a major
acquisition or disposal, changes in tax rates or tax laws, large falls in asset values or big foreign
exchange losses. These non-adjusting events do not require the financial statements to be re-
stated but they should be disclosed in the notes to the financial statements if they are material.
There are no major differences in principle between IPSAS 14 and IAS 10, although some extra
guidance is given in the former to explain better how it applies to the private sector. Other than
that the differences are once more largely in terminology.
The objective of IPSAS 17 is to prescribe the accounting treatment for property, plant, and
equipment so that users of financial statements can discern information about an entity’s
investment in this and the changes in such investment. The principal issues in accounting for
property, plant, and equipment are (a) the recognition of the assets, (b) the determination of their
carrying amounts (a carrying amount is the value that the asset has in the Statement of Financial
Position), and (c) the depreciation charges and impairment losses to be recognized in relation
to them.
The Standard applies to all assets (except some which are specifically dealt with by other IPSAS)
including some that are quite specific to the public sector such as specialist military equipment
and infrastructure assets (these would be for example roads or bridges). It does not however
apply to mining activities when mineral reserves such as oil or gas are depleted by uses. It does
not apply either to biological assets (these include animals kept for resale or slaughter or crops
grown for harvesting) which are dealt with by IPSAS 27. Other IPSAS also deal with assets in
specific situations, such as IPSAS 16, which deals with properties held for investment purposes,
or IPSAS 13 on leased assets.
Only directly attributable costs may be capitalised as part of the asset value. IPSAS 17 says
that these include:
• The costs of employee benefits (as defined in the relevant international or national accounting
standard dealing with employee benefits – the IPSAS dealing with this is IPSAS 25) arising
directly from the construction or acquisition of the item of property, plant, and equipment;
• Costs of site preparation;
• Initial delivery and handling costs;
• Installation and assembly costs;
• Costs of testing whether the asset is functioning properly, after deducting the net proceeds
from selling any items produced while bringing the asset to that location and condition (such
as samples produced when testing equipment); and
• Professional fees.
An important element of IPSAS 17 is that entities that are making the transition to accruals
accounting based on IPSAS for the first time have a five-year period to make that transition as far
as the recognition of plant, property and equipment under this particular Standard is concerned.
Further, an entity that adopts accrual accounting for the first time in accordance with IPSASs
shall initially recognize property, plant, and equipment at cost or fair value. For items of property,
plant, and equipment that were acquired at no cost, or for a nominal cost, cost is the item’s fair
value as at the date of acquisition (this might be the case if for example an asset was gifted as
part of a legacy or was transferred at no cost from another government department).
In such situations, the entity shall recognize the effect of the initial recognition of property, plant,
and equipment as an adjustment to the opening balance of accumulated surpluses or deficits for
the period in which the property, plant, and equipment is initially recognized.
Although IPSAS 17 is drawn primarily from IAS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment, as amended
by IAS 16 (part of the Improvements to IFRSs which was issued in May 2008) there are some
differences between the private and public sector versions of the Standard. As one detailed
example, at the time of issuing IPSAS 17, the IPSASB has not yet considered the applicability of
CPA EXAMINATION I1.2 FINANCIAL REPORTING 383
STUDY MANUAL
IFRS 5, Non-current Assets Held for Sale andDiscontinued Operations to public sector entities;
therefore, IPSAS 17 does not reflect amendments made to IAS 16 consequent upon the issue
of IFRS 5.
However, the main differences between IPSAS 17 and IAS 16 (2003) are as follows:
• IPSAS 17 does not require or prohibit the recognition of heritage assets. An entity that recognizes
heritage assets is required to comply with the disclosure requirements of this Standard with
respect to those heritage assets that have been recognized and may, but is not required to,
comply with other requirements of this Standard in respect of those heritage assets. IAS 16
does not have a similar exclusion. (A heritage asset is one which has particular historic or
cultural significance, such as a Parliament building or an archaeological site which makes
the use of conventional asset valuation rules of limited relevance)
• IAS 16 requires items of property, plant, and equipment to be initially measured at cost. IPSAS
17 states that where an item is acquired at no cost, or for a nominal cost, its cost is its fair value
as at the date it is acquired.
• IAS 16 requires, where an enterprise adopts the revaluation model and carries items of property,
plant, and equipment at revalued amounts, the equivalent historical cost amounts should be
disclosed. This requirement is not included in IPSAS 17.
• Under IAS 16, revaluation increases and decreases may only be matched on an individual
item basis. Under IPSAS 17, revaluation increases and decreases are offset on a class of asset
basis (this could make a significant difference).
• IPSAS 17 contains transitional provisions for both the first time adoption and changeover
from the previous version of IPSAS 17. IAS 16 only contains transitional provisions for entities
that have already used IFRSs. Specifically, IPSAS 17 contains transitional provisions allowing
entities to not recognize property, plant, and equipment for reporting periods beginning on
a date within five years following the date of first adoption of accrual accounting in accordance
with IPSASs. The transitional provisions also allow entities to recognize property, plant, and
equipment at fair value on first adopting this Standard. IAS 16 does not include these transitional
provisions. This is an important concession in that it can sometimes be very difficult to assemble
all the necessary data to allow the transition to an accruals-based approach to asset
accounting and it allows public sector entities a significant amount of time to do so.
• IPSAS 17 contains definitions of “impairment loss of a non-cash-generating asset” and
“recoverable service amount.” IAS 16 does not contain these definitions. This is an important
distinction. A non-cash generating asset is one that is not held for the generation of a commercial
return and there are a number of these in use in the public sector which would not be the case
in the private sector.
• IPSAS 17 uses different terminology, in certain instances, from IAS 16. The most significant
examples are the use of the terms “statement of financial performance,” and “net assets/equity”
in IPSAS 17. The equivalent terms in IAS 16 are “income statement” and “equity.” IPSAS 17
does not use the term “income,” which in IAS 16 has a broader meaning than the term “revenue.”
The examples included in IAS 38 have been modified to better address public sector
circumstances.
• IPSAS 31 uses different terminology, in certain instances, from IAS 38. The most significant
examples are the use of the terms “revenue,” “statement of financial performance,” “surplus or
deficit,” “future economic benefits or service potential,” “accumulated surpluses or deficits,”
“operating/operation,” “rights from binding arrangements (including rights from contracts or
other legal rights),” and “net assets/equity” in IPSAS 31. The equivalent terms in IAS 38 are
“income,” “statement of comprehensive income,” “profit or loss,” “future economic benefits,”
“retained earnings,” “business,” “contractual or other legal rights,” and “equity.”
In terms of the comparison of IPSAS 16 to IAS 40 (2003), Investment Property, the IPSAS notes
that the IPSASB has not yet considered the applicability of IFRS 4, Insurance Contracts,
and IFRS 5, Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations, to public sector
entities; therefore IPSAS 16 does not reflect amendments made to IAS 40 consequent upon the
issue of those IFRSs.
The other main differences between IPSAS 16 and IAS 40 are as follows:
If on the other hand there is no exchange of approximately equal value then IPSAS 23 will
apply – such transactions will be described as ‘non-exchange’ in nature. This will be the case for
many public sector transactions. For example when governments raise taxation revenues, there
is no direct correlation between them and consequent expenditures. Although the taxpayer will
rightly expect ‘value’ from their tax contributions, it is not normally possible to directly match their
individual contributions to say expenditures on health, education, defence or many other public
services.
There are no significant variations between IPSAS 9 and IAS 18, with the differences in detail
being as follows:
• The title of IPSAS 9 differs from that of IAS 18, and this difference clarifies that
• IPSAS 9 does not deal with revenue from non-exchange transactions.
• The definition of “revenue” adopted in IPSAS 9 is similar to the definition adopted in IAS 18.
The main difference is that the definition in IAS 18 refers to ordinary activities (IPSAS 9
makes no such distinction).
• Commentary additional to that in IAS 18 has also been included in IPSAS 9 to clarify the
applicability of the standards to accounting by public sector entities.
• IPSAS 9 uses different terminology, in certain instances, from IAS 18. The most significant
example is the use of the term “net assets/equity” in IPSAS 9. The equivalent term in IAS 18 is
“equity.”
• Taxes; and
• Transfers, including:
• a. Debt forgiveness and assumption of liabilities;
• b. Fines;
• c. Bequests;
• d. Gifts and Donations, including goods in-kind;
• e. Services in-kind;
• Permits, but does not require, the recognition of services in-kind; and
• Requires disclosures to be made in respect of revenue from non-exchange transactions.
An entity will recognize an asset arising from a non-exchange transaction when it gains control
of resources that meet the definition of an asset and satisfy the recognition criteria. Contributions
from owners do not give rise to revenue, so each type of transaction is analysed, and any
contributions from owners are accounted for separately. Consistent with the approach set out in
this Standard, entities will analyse non-exchange transactions to determine which elements of
general purpose financial statements will be recognized as a result of the transactions.
Two kinds of revenue transaction are relevant within the framework of IPSAS 23. The first is when
an asset comes under the control of an entity without an approximately equivalent exchange
taking place in return. This would be the case when for example an asset is transferred to an
organisation free of charge (or, if there is a charge, it is significantly below market value). In such
circumstances a simple yes/no decision tree needs to be followed which is illustrated below.
Taxation revenue arises only for the government that imposes the tax, and not for other entities.
For example, where the Rwandan government imposes a tax that is collected by the RRA,
assets and revenue accrue to the government, not the taxation agency which is effectively acting
as a collection agency on behalf of government.
Taxes do not satisfy the definition of contributions from owners, because the payment of taxes
does not give the taxpayers a right to receive (a) distributions of future economic benefits or
service potential by the entity during its life, or (b) distribution of any excess of assets over
liabilities in the event of the government being wound up. Nor does the payment of taxes provide
taxpayers with an ownership right in the government that can be sold, exchanged, transferred,
or redeemed.
On the other hand, taxes satisfy the definition of a non-exchange transaction because the
taxpayer transfers resources to the government, without receiving approximately equal value
directly in exchange. While the taxpayer may benefit from a range of social policies established
by the government, these are not provided directly in exchange as consideration for the payment
of taxes.
Recognition of taxation revenue is based on the time at which the taxable event takes place,
examples of which are when:
• Income tax is the earning of assessable income during the taxation period by the taxpayer;
• Value-added tax is the undertaking of taxable activity during the taxation period by the taxpayer;
• Goods and services tax is the purchase or sale of taxable goods and services during the taxation
period;
• Customs duty is the movement of dutiable goods or services across the customs boundary;
• Property tax is the passing of the date on which the tax is levied, or the period for which the tax
is levied, if the tax is levied on a periodic basis.
Fines normally require an entity to transfer a fixed amount of cash to the government, and do not
impose on the government any obligations which may be recognized as a liability. As such, fines
are recognized as revenue when the receivable meets the definition of an asset and satisfies the
criteria for recognition as an asset which have already been discussed. Where an entity collects
fines in the capacity of an agent, the fine will not be revenue of the collecting entity. Assets
arising from fines are measured at the best estimate of the inflow of resources to the entity.
The entity will need to determine if the deceased person’s estate is sufficient to meet all claims
on it, and satisfy all bequests. If the will is disputed, this will also affect the probability
of assets flowing to the entity. Therefore it can be seen that asset and revenue recognition is
not always a straightforward situation with bequests. It is necessary to obtain an estimate of the
fair value of bequeathed assets, for example by obtaining the latest market values for assets
bequeathed.
Disclosures
Both IFRSs and IPSASs are as much about disclosure as they are about accounting treatment.
IPSAS 23 has a list of disclosure requirements that apply specifically to non-exchange
transactions. These include a requirement to disclose the following details:
Either on the face of, or in the notes to, the general purpose financial statements:
• The amount of revenue from non-exchange transactions recognized during the period by
major classes showing separately:
An entity shall disclose in the notes to the general purpose financial statements:
• The accounting policies adopted for the recognition of revenue from non-exchange transactions;
• For major classes of revenue from non-exchange transactions, the basis on which the fair value
of inflowing resources was measured;
• For major classes of taxation revenue that the entity cannot measure reliably during the period
in which the taxable event occurs, information about the nature of the tax; and
• The nature and type of major classes of bequests, gifts, and donations.
IPSAS 5 is drawn primarily from IAS 23, Borrowing Costs. The Standard makes clear that
borrowing may be for commercial purposes or, in the case of government entities, for social
policy at a notional charge – IPSAS 5 specifically gives as an example of such an entity a
government housing department.
There are no significant differences between IPSAS 5 and IAS 23. Those small differences which
do exist are as follows:
• Commentary additional to that in IAS 23 has been included in IPSAS 5 to clarify the applicability
of the standards to accounting by public sector entities.
• IPSAS 5 uses different terminology, in certain instances, from IAS 23. The most significant
examples are the use of the terms “revenue,” “statement of financial performance,” and “net
assets/equity” in IPSAS 5. The equivalent terms in IAS 23 are “income,” “income statement,”
and “equity.”
• IPSAS 5 contains a different set of definitions of technical terms from IAS 23 (these are included
in paragraph 5 and cover ‘borrowing costs’ and ‘qualifying asset’).
Leases – IPSAS 13
This is drawn primarily from IAS 17, Leases. Several exceptions are outlined by IPSAS 13 where
other IPSASs will be applied instead. These are IPSAS 16 (Investment Properties) and IPSAS
27 (Biological Assets). Also not covered by IPSAS 13 are situations where there are leases to
explore or use mineral assets, oil, etc. and licensing agreements such as those covering motion
picture films, plays, patents and copyrights.
There are no substantial differences between IPSAS 13 and IAS 17. Those differences that do
exist are as follows;
• Commentary additional to that in IAS 17 has been included in IPSAS 13 to clarify the applicability
of the standards to accounting by public sector entities.
• IPSAS 13 uses different terminology, in certain instances, from IAS 17. The most significant
examples is the use of the term “statement of financial performance” in IPSAS 13. The equivalent
term in IAS 17 is “income statement.”
• IPSAS 13 does not use the term “income,” which in IAS 17 has a broader meaning than the
term “revenue.”
• IPSAS 13 has additional implementation guidance that illustrates the classification of a lease,
the treatment of a finance lease by a lessee, the treatment of a finance lease by a lessor, and
the calculation of the interest rate implicit in a finance lease.
Helpfully, IPSAS 6 gives more guidance as to when control exists. It states that control is
presumed to exist when at least one of the following power conditions and one of the following
benefit conditions exists, unless there is clear evidence of control being held by another entity.
Power Conditions
• The entity has, directly or indirectly through controlled entities, ownership of a majority voting
interest in the other entity.
• The entity has the power, either granted by or exercised within existing legislation, to appoint or
remove a majority of the members of the board of directors or equivalent governing body, and
control of the other entity is by that board or by that body.
• The entity has the power to cast, or regulate the casting of, a majority of the votes that are likely
to be cast at a general meeting of the other entity.
• The entity has the power to cast the majority of votes at meetings of the board of directors or
equivalent governing body, and control of the other entity is by that board or by that body.
Benefit Conditions
• The entity has the power to dissolve the other entity and obtain a significant level of the residual
economic benefits or is required to bear significant obligations in such circumstances. For
example the benefit condition may be met if an entity has responsibility for the residual liabilities
of another entity.
• The entity has the power to extract distributions of assets from the other entity, and/or may be
liable for certain obligations of the other entity.
This is not the only test however. When one or more of the circumstances listed above does
not exist, the following factors are likely, either individually or collectively, to be indicative of the
existence of control.
Power Indicators
• The entity has the ability to veto operating and capital budgets of the other entity.
• The entity has the ability to veto, overrule, or modify governing body decisions of the other entity.
• The entity has the ability to approve the hiring, reassignment, and removal of key personnel
of the other entity.
• The mandate of the other entity is established and limited by legislation.
• The entity holds a golden share (or equivalent) in the other entity that confers rights to govern
the financial and operating policies of that other entity.
• The entity holds direct or indirect title to the net assets/equity of the other entity, with an
ongoing right to access these.
• The entity has a right to a significant level of the net assets/equity of the other entity in the
event of a liquidation, or in a distribution other than a liquidation.
• The entity is able to direct the other entity to cooperate with it in achieving its
objectives.
• The entity is exposed to the residual liabilities of the other entity.
IPSAS 6 notes that in some instances, an economic entity will include a number of intermediate
controlling entities. For example, in a publicly-controlled health sector while a department of
health may be the ultimate controlling entity, there may be intermediate controlling entities
at the local or regional health authority level. Accountability and reporting requirements within
each jurisdiction may specify which entities are required to (or exempted from the requirement
to) prepare consolidated financial statements. Where there is no specific reporting requirement
for an intermediate controlling entity to prepare consolidated financial statements for which
users are likely to exist, intermediate controlling entities are to prepare and publish consolidated
financial statements.
IPSAS 6 also interacts with other IPSASs. In one specific example, outlined in the Standard a
controlled entity should be excluded from consolidation when there is evidence that (a) control
is intended to be temporary because the controlled entity is acquired and held exclusively with
a view to its disposal within twelve months from acquisition, and (b) management is
actively seeking a buyer. Such controlled entities are classified and accounted for as financial
instruments. IPSAS 28, Financial Instruments: Presentation, IPSAS 29, Financial Instruments:
Recognition and Measurement, and IPSAS 30, Financial Instruments: Disclosures provides
guidance on financial instruments.
An example of temporary control is where a controlled entity is acquired with a firm plan to
dispose of it within twelve months. This may occur where an economic entity is acquired, and an
entity within it is to be disposed of because its activities are dissimilar to those of the acquirer.
Temporary control also occurs where the controlling entity intends to cede control over a
controlled entity to another entity – for example a national government may transfer its interest in
a controlled entity to a local government. For this exemption to apply, the controlling entity must
be demonstrably committed to a formal plan to dispose of, or no longer control, the entity that
is subject to temporary control. An entity is demonstrably committed to dispose of, or no longer
control, another entity when it has a formal plan to do so, and there is no realistic possibility of
withdrawal from that plan.
Having said that, a controlled entity is not excluded from consolidation because its activities are
dissimilar to those of the other entities within the economic entity, for example the consolidation
of GBEs with entities in the budget sector. Relevant information is provided by consolidating
such controlled entities and disclosing additional information in the consolidated
financial statements about the different activities of controlled entities. IPSAS
18, Segment Reporting, helps to explain the significance of different activities within the economic
entity.
There are challenges in the ‘mechanics’ of putting consolidated financial statements together. In
preparing consolidated financial statements, an entity combines the financial statements of the
controlling entity and its controlled entities line by line, by adding together like items of assets,
• The amount of those minority interests at the date of the original combination;
and
• The minority’s share of changes in net assets/equity since the date of combination.
Balances, transactions, revenues, and expenses between entities within the economic entity
shall be eliminated in full. This is straightforward enough to understand in theory but in practice
requires well-coordinated cooperation between the various entities included in the group to
ensure that there is a consistent treatment of the transactions involved. It also requires consistent
accounting policies as IPSAS 6 requires that consolidated financial statements shall be prepared
using uniform accounting policies for like transactions and other events in similar circumstances.
On occasion, the IPSASs regime may allow transitional arrangements to apply to specific IPSASs
when an entity is moving to full accruals-based IPSAS implementation for the very first time.
IPSAS 6 is one of these. It states that entities are not required to comply with the requirement
concerning the elimination of balances and transactions between entities within the economic
entity for reporting periods beginning on a date within three years following the date of first
adoption of accrual accounting in accordance with IPSASs. This recognises the occasionally
complex procedures that may need to be set up to eliminate intra-entity transactions and balances.
This is because controlling entities that adopt accruals accounting for the first time in accordance
with IPSASs may have many controlled entities, with a significant number of transactions between
these entities. Accordingly, it may be difficult to identify some transactions and balances that
need to be eliminated for the purpose of preparing the consolidated financial statements of the
economic entity.
If entities choose to apply the transitional provisions, they shall disclose the fact that not all
balances and transactions occurring between entities within the economic entity have been
eliminated.
In terms of differences from IAS 27, Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements , from
which IPSAS 6 is drawn, has the following variations;
• At the time of issuing IPSAS 6, the IPSASB has not considered the applicability of IFRS 5, Non-
current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations, to public sector entities; therefore
IPSAS 6 does not reflect amendments made to IAS 27 consequent upon the issue of IFRS
5.
As the name implies, the Standard provides the basis for accounting for ownership interests in
associates. This occurs when the investment in the other entity confers on the investor the risks
and rewards incidental to an ownership interest. The Standard applies only to investments
in the formal equity structure (or its equivalent) of an investee. A formal equity structure means
share capital or an equivalent form of unitized capital, such as units in a property trust, but may
also include other equity structures in which the investor’s interest can be measured reliably.
Where the equity structure is poorly defined, it may not be possible to obtain a reliable measure
of the ownership interest.
• Commentary additional to that in IAS 28 has been included in IPSAS 7 to clarify the
applicability of the standards to accounting by public sector entities.
• IPSAS 7 applies to all investments in associates where the investor holds an
ownership interest in the associate in the form of a shareholding or other formal equity
structure. IAS 28 does not contain similar ownership interest requirements.
• However, it is unlikely that equity accounting could be applied unless the associate had a
formal or other reliably measurable equity structure.
• IPSAS 7 uses different terminology, in certain instances, from IAS 28. The most significant
examples are the use of the terms “statement of financial performance,” and “net assets/equity”
in IPSAS 7. The equivalent terms in IAS 28 are “income statement,” and “equity.”
• IPSAS 7 does not use the term “income,” which in IAS 28 has a broader meaning than the term
“revenue”.
The existence of a binding arrangement distinguishes interests that involve joint control from
investments in associates in which the investor has significant influence (as already referred
to in discussions on IPSAS 7, Investments in Associates.) For the purposes of IPSAS 8, an
arrangement includes all binding arrangements between venturers. That is, in substance, the
arrangement confers similar rights and obligations on the parties to it as if it were in the form of
a contract.
One example given by IPSAS 8 is when two government departments may enter into a formal
arrangement to undertake a joint venture, but the arrangement may not constitute a legal contract
because, in that jurisdiction, individual departments may not be separate legal entities with the
power to contract. Activities that have no binding arrangement to establish joint control are not
joint ventures for the purposes of IPSAS 8.
The binding arrangement establishes joint control over the joint venture. Such a requirement
ensures that no single venturer is in a position to control the activity unilaterally. The arrangement
identifies (a) those decisions in areas essential to the goals of the joint venture that require the
consent of all the venturers, and (b) those decisions that may require the consent of a specified
majority of the venturers.
Many public sector entities establish joint ventures to undertake a variety of activities. The nature
of these activities ranges from commercial undertakings to provision of community services at no
charge. The terms of a joint venture are set out in a contract or other binding arrangement and
usually specify the initial contribution from each joint venturer and the share of revenues or other
benefits (if any), and expenses of each of the joint venturers.
Joint ventures take many different forms and structures. IPSAS 8 identifies three broad types
– jointly controlled operations, jointly controlled assets, and jointly controlled entities – that are
commonly described as, and meet the definition of, joint ventures. The following characteristics
are common to all joint ventures:
• Two or more venturers are bound by a binding arrangement; and
• The binding arrangement establishes joint control.
At the time of issuing IPSAS 8, the IPSASB has not considered the applicability of IFRS 3,
Business Combinations, and IFRS 5, Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued
Operations, to public sector entities. Therefore, IPSAS 8 does not reflect amendments made to
IAS 31 consequent on the issue of IFRS 3 and IFRS 5. The main differences between IPSAS 8
and IAS 31 are as follows:
• Commentary additional to that in IAS 31 has been included in IPSAS 8 to clarify the applicability
of the standards to accounting by public sector entities.
• IPSAS 8 uses different terminology, in certain instances, from IAS 31. The most significant
examples are the use of the terms “statement of financial performance,” and “net assets/equity”
in IPSAS 8. The equivalent terms in IAS 31 are “income statement,” and “equity.”
• IPSAS 8 does not use the term “income,” which in IAS 31 has a broader meaning than the term
“revenue.”
• IPSAS 8 uses a different definition of “joint venture” from IAS 31. The term “contractual
arrangement” has been replaced by “binding arrangement.”
• IPSAS 8 includes a transitional provision that permits entities that adopt proportionate
consolidation treatment to not eliminate all balances and transactions between venturers, their
controlled entities, and entities that they jointly control for reporting periods beginning on a
date within three years following the date of adopting accrual accounting for the first time in
accordance with IPSASs. IAS 31 does not contain transitional provisions