Report
Report
Francisca Yonker
Ms. Veltman
AP Seminar
27 September 2023
annually, significantly contributing to the economic prosperity of the region. However, this
presents a challenge: how to balance the economic benefits from tourism with the need to protect
the wolf population that attracts these visitors. Tourism can disrupt wolf habitats and behavior.
Improper conduct by tourists can negatively impact wolf behavior, such as attempting to interact
with wolves. Traffic and road-related risks pose risks to wolves, leading to accidents, injuries,
and fatalities. Government control and poaching remain a significant issue, targeting wolves both
within the park and in areas bordering it such as Idaho, Wyoming and Montana. Lack of
awareness and education about responsible behavior around wolves is another issue. (Francisco J
Santiago-Ávila, Adrian Treves, p.1) Balancing wildlife conservation and sustainable tourism
interests is challenging, and trespassing by tourists is another concern. The elimination of wolves
had cascading effects on the park's ecosystem. With fewer wolves to keep prey populations (such
as elk) in check, these prey species became overabundant, leading to habitat degradation in
certain areas of the park (Juanita M. Constable Luke H. Sandro Richard E. Lee, Jr, P.1). The loss
of a top predator like the wolf had far-reaching ecological consequences. Adding on, “gray
wolves were hunted to local extinction by 1926, but were reintroduced in 1995 after a decades-
2
long process involving biologists, politicians, ranchers, and the general public”(Juanita M.
Constable, Luke H.Sandro, Richard E. Lee JR, p.1). Many wolf species were killed during the
years 1914-26 a minimum of 136 wolves including about 80 pups (59%) were removed from
dens , trapped , shot , and probably poisoned within the park (John Weaver, P.9). However later
in Wyoming and South Dakota 508 wolves were killed 1918-23 by government personnel , with
the last one taken in 1940. In Montana , government agents removed 413 wolves during 1918-30
and their last one in 1945. (John Weaver, P.21) Unfortunately, the local economy relies heavily
on tourism. Managing tourists to enter the park while ensuring the safety of wolves is a
challenge. Commercial interests often conflict with conservation goals. Visitors' freedom and
regulation are also important considerations. Addressing these aspects involves the participation
considering the environmental,political, social, economic extents is necessary to ensure the long-
Yellowstone National Park has been struggling with the balance between generating
economic revenue from tourism and preserving its diverse ecosystem and wildlife. According to
a report by the U.S. Department of the Interior (2019), the park witnessed a record-breaking
number of visitors, indicating the substantial economic importance of tourism to the Yellowstone
region. However, this surge in tourism also raises concerns about its impact on the native wolf
population. Research by Douglas W. Smith, P.J White, and Daniel R. Stanler states that since the
reintroduction of wolves, there have been instances of tourists inadvertently harming wolves
through their behavior. These include getting too close to wolves, approaching dens, and feeding
wildlife (P.5). Talking about this balance necessitates an understanding of the socio-economic
3
dynamics at play, the ecological needs of the Yellowstone ecosystem, and the behavioral patterns
Many authors agree on the fact that it is tourism which is the main result for the harm of
wolves. However, Alistair J. Bath, Thomas Buchanan and John Weaver agree that it is
government control that is harming them. They state that; The US government's historical
decline in wolf populations in the early 20th century was largely due to predator eradication
campaigns (P.6). In 1973, the Endangered Species Act was passed, recognizing wolf threats. In
1995 and 1996, wolves were reintroduced to Yellowstone National Park. The government
manages wolf populations through collaboration and hunting regulations (P.2). However they
may disagree that the government does not only do good, in fact, John Weaver states that
“Government control from 1914-26 removed at least 136 wolves including 80 pups.” (John
Weaver, P.9) Which led wolves were even placed on the NRMW on the endangered species list
in 1973 due to government and private control drastically reducing the number of wolves. (P.23)
Mark S.Boyce and Juanita M.Constible, Luke H. Sandro and Richard E. Lee Jr. who
specialize in the area of managing wolves in the Yellowstone area do not support poaching.
However, they bring up the topic of “GPS Telemetry” which is basically what it sounds like.
GPS telemetry in managing wolves in Yellowstone National Park refers to the integration of
Global Positioning System (GPS) technology with telemetry devices to track and monitor the
movements, behaviors, and spatial utilization of wolves within the park's ecosystem. By
outfitting wolves with GPS collars or tags, researchers and wildlife managers can collect precise
and real-time location data, shedding light on critical aspects of their behavior and habitat use.
What the authors are trying to communicate is that GPS telemetry helps reduce potential human-
wildlife conflicts by identifying areas of high wolf activity. Which can further guide the
4
enhancing the understanding of wolf behavior and ecology, promoting a balanced and
Douglas W. Smith, P.J White, Daniel. R Stanler and Elizabeth Covelli Metcalf share the
same ideas on how wolves were hunted in 2009, 2011, and 2013 in Idaho, Montana, and
Wyoming (P.2). Since 1968, the National Park Service has adopted ecosystem process
management, which has led to overgrazing and habitat degradation (P.3). Wolves have also been
reintroduced due to human actions, such as approaching dens and feeding wildlife.
Works Cited
Bath, Alistair J., and Thomas Buchanan. “Attitudes of Interest Groups in Wyoming toward Wolf
Sept. 2023.
Constible, Juanita M., et al. “Carrion: Its What’s for Dinner: Wolves Reduce the Impact of
Climate Change.” The American Biology Teacher, vol. 70, no. 2, 2008, pp. 95–102.
Douglas W. Smith, et al. “Managing Wolves in the Yellowstone Area: Balancing Goals Across
Jurisdictional Boundaries.” Wildlife Society Bulletin (2011-), vol. 40, no. 3, 2016, pp.
September. 2023.
Meredith S. Berry, et al. “Using Spatial, Economic, and Ecological Opinion Data to Inform Gray
Wolf Conservation.” Wildlife Society Bulletin (2011-), vol. 40, no. 3, 2016, pp. 554–63.
Povilitis, Tony. “Preserving a Natural Wolf Population in Yellowstone National Park, USA.”
The
George Wright Forum, vol. 32, no. 1, 2015, pp. 25–34. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/
play.google.com/book/