Overview p. 34 // CM/PM-for-Fee Revenue p. 34 // The Top 20 Firms in Combined Design and CM/PM-for-Fee Revenue p.

35
The Top 20 Firms in Combined Industry Revenue p. 35 // Revenue by Owner Type p. 35 // The Top 50 Program Management Firms p. 36
The Top 50 CM-for-Fee Management Firms p. 37 // The Top 100 CM-for-Fee/Program Management Firms p. 38

JENGA Vertex was owner's project

NUMBER 35 FIRM
manager on Boston University's
$288-million Center for Comput-
ing and Data Sciences, the largest
carbon-neutral building in Boston.
PHOTOBYTOMARBAN, COURTESYOFTHEVERTEXCOS.

Complex Challenges Stacking Up

Revenue rises as owners use more third-party services, but firms say staying
competitive and profitable is a big balancing act. By Emell Adolphus and Jonathan Keller
enr.com June 26/July 3, 2023 ■ ENR ■ 33

0703_TopPSF_Intro.indd 33 6/27/23 4:16 PM

 H
ow can owners prepare for uncertainty? Per this year’s
top professional services firms, the answer is early and
often. As interest rate hikes slow market inflation, more
owners turn to third-party managers to weigh project
costs and seek savings. But firms say ongoing shortages
could jeopardize project profitability without more collaboration.
After last year’s record-setting inflation rates, owners the inflationary impact.” According to many top pro-
are revising their construction program priorities, On the fessional services firms, the Federal Reserve’s goal to
says Sofia Berger, senior vice president of WSP USA’s Web cool economic growth by raising interest rates is al-
transportation national business line. The company ready having an effect on project financing. Yet own-
is ranked No. 10 on this year’s Top 50 program man- ers are not ready to completely freeze their projects
agement (PM) list and No. 6 in construction manage- just yet.
ment (CM). For expanded
“The unpredictability of future construction mate- content on the Rescoping Risks
ENR Top Lists,
rial costs has caused more variability in the bidding of As interest rates climb, Mark Anderson, CEO of
see ENR.com/
design-build projects,” she explains. “That said, on the toplists. MGAC, says he is seeing more clients “be selective any
whole, the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law’s funding has time debt financing is necessary for a project.” The
increased overall infrastructure construction despite company is ranked No. 42 in PM and No. 28 in CM.

CM/PM Fees Rise

$ BILLIONS DOMESTIC REVENUE INTERNATIONAL REVENUE
2019 2022
2018 $18.88 2021 $19.14
2017
$17.74 $18.20 2020 $18.23
2015 2016
$17.01
$16.62 $16.63
2014
$14.83

2016 2022
2015 2020 2021
$6.78 2018 2019 $7.02
2014 $6.04 $6.00 $6.37
2017 $5.58 $5.55
$5.08
$4.40

SOURCE: ENR

34 ■ ENR ■ June 26/July 3, 2023 enr.com

0703_Top_PSF_Overview.indd 34 6/27/23 4:14 PM

 SNC-LAVALINsubsidiary Atkins
#10 will provide CMservices on The Line,
a 170-km-long carless urban develop-
ment in Saudi Arabia.
OVERVIEW

Anderson adds that the traditional pro forma

methods of calculating financial results don’t look The Top 20 Firms in Combined
as “attractive” during periods of higher interest rates.
“So looking at creative options to offset the addi-
Design and CM-PM
tional cost of capital have come in several ways,” he
explains. “This has involved more intensive plan-
Professional Services Revenue
2022 REVENUE IN $ MIL.
ning, up-front financial analysis, and cost modeling RANK DESIGN CM/PM-FOR- TOTAL
2023 FIRM REVENUE FEE REVENUE REVENUE
to inform the design from the onset of the project 1 JACOBS SOLUTIONS INC., Dallas, Texas $11,532.3 $3,328.3 $14,860.6
and begin the value management process as the de- 2 AECOM, Dallas, Texas $8,115.1 $1,524.4 $9,639.4
sign process starts.” 3 FLUOR, Irving, Texas $4,510.6 $- $4,510.6
Alternative contract structures such as design-build 4 BECHTEL, Reston, Va. $1,047.0 $3,354.0 $4,401.0
and CM-at-risk with a guaranteed maximum price 5 TETRA TECH, Pasadena, Calif. $4,230.0 $- $4,230.0
have made for better collaboration and cost controls 6 WSP USA, New York, N.Y. $3,323.1 $723.4 $4,046.5
on MGAC projects, says Anderson. “Regardless of con- 7 PARSONS CORP., Centreville, Va. $1,298.2 $2,437.7 $3,735.9
tract type, we continue to promote early team engage- 8 HDR, Omaha, Neb. $2,776.0 $410.6 $3,186.6
ment, collaboration, and transparency throughout the 9 BURNS & MCDONNELL, Kansas City, Mo. $2,478.2 $213.5 $2,691.8
design and construction process to ensure we are iden- 10 STANTEC INC., Irvine, Calif. $2,203.8 $144.4 $2,348.2
tifying and resolving challenges quickly and early in 11 KIMLEY-HORN, Raleigh, N.C. $2,034.8 $- $2,034.8
the project lifecycle,” he says. 12 CBRE, Dallas, Texas $- $2,028.0 $2,028.0
For some top firms, the solutions to last year’s prob- 13 ARCADIS NORTH AMERICA, Highlands Ranch, Colo. $1,620.5 $371.9 $1,992.4
lems are proving to be this year’s challenges. With the 14 WORLEY, Houston, Texas $1,802.2 $165.0 $1,967.2
Fed expecting to hike interest rates at least two more 15 JLL, Chicago, Ill. $- $1,858.0 $1,858.0
times this year, potentially pushing the country into a 16 GENSLER, Los Angeles, Calif. $1,785.0 $- $1,785.0
recession, owners are leaning on professional services 17 BLACK & VEATCH, Overland Park, Kan. $1,413.3 $172.6 $1,585.8
firms now more than ever to guide them through a 18 HNTB COS., Kansas City, Mo. $1,556.9 $- $1,556.9

looming period of uncertainty. To meet owner de- 19 SNC-LAVALIN GROUP, Tampa, Fla. $1,002.9 $496.8 $1,499.6
20 TRC COS. INC., Windsor, Conn. $1,227.6 $- $1,227.6
mands and build the capacity of their services, top
firms say they are reconfiguring operations to rescope
how they use employees and productivity resources.
The Top 20 Firms in
Balancing Supply and Demand
Material price increases, volatile supply chains and cost
Combined Industry Revenue
2022 REVENUE IN $ MIL.
of living and labor shortages are all challenges stem- RANK CONTRACTING DESIGN CM/PM-FOR- TOTAL
2023 FIRM REVENUE REVENUE FEE REVENUE REVENUE
ming from supply and demand that professional ser- 1 THE TURNER CORP., New York, N.Y. $16,256.3 $- $156.3 $16,412.6
vices firms are grappling with in their own way, says 2 BECHTEL, Reston, Va. $11,986.0 $1,047.0 $3,354.0 $16,387.0
3 AECOM, Dallas, Texas $6,126.1 $8,115.1 $1,524.4 $15,765.5
4 JACOBS SOLUTIONS INC., Dallas, Texas $- $11,532.3 $3,328.3 $14,860.6
5 FLUOR, Irving, Texas $7,920.3 $4,510.6 $- $12,430.9
6 KIEWIT CORP., Omaha, Neb. $11,242.7 $1,095.9 $- $12,338.5
PERCENT SHARE OF TOTAL REVENUE
7 MASTEC INC., Coral Gables, Fla. $11,605.0 $- $- $11,605.0
BY OWNER TYPE 8 STO BUILDING GROUP, New York, N.Y. $10,390.0 $- $- $10,390.0
9 DPR CONSTRUCTION, Redwood City, Calif. $9,234.5 $3.0 $- $9,237.5
FEDERAL 10 THE WHITING-TURNER CONTR. CO., Baltimore, Md. $8,599.9 $- $24.5 $8,624.3

27.6% 11 CLARK GROUP, McLean, Va. $7,219.3 $- $- $7,219.3

12 SKANSKA USA, New York, N.Y. $6,873.6 $- $89.2 $6,962.8
13 BURNS & MCDONNELL, Kansas City, Mo.
STATE/LOCAL $3,871.2 $2,478.2 $213.5 $6,562.9
14 GILBANE BUILDING CO., Providence, R.I.
28.2% 15 HENSEL PHELPS, Greeley, Colo.
$6,333.8
$6,419.6
$-
$-
$166.2
$-
$6,500.0
$6,419.6

PRIVATE 16 PCL CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES, Denver, Colo. $6,142.7 $- $- $6,142.7

43.6% 17 THE WALSH GROUP, Chicago, Ill.

18 JE DUNN CONSTRUCTION GROUP, Kansas City, Mo.
$5,898.6
$5,827.8
$-
$-
$-
$-
$5,898.6
$5,827.8
19 ARCO CONSTRUCTION COS., St. Louis, Mo. $5,661.9 $- $- $5,661.9
20 HITT CONTRACTING INC., Falls Church, Va. $5,416.3 $- $- $5,416.3

enr.com June 26/July 3, 2023 ■ ENR ■ 35

0703_Top_PSF_Overview.indd 35 6/27/23 4:14 PM

 THE TOP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRMS

The Top 50 Program Gardiner & Theobald director Josh McCrow. Owners
Management Firms 2022 REVENUE IN $ MIL.
are leaving no stone unturned in seeking ways to save
costs,“from superstructure, MEP systems, cladding
RANK DOMESTIC INT’L TOTAL systems all the way through interior finishes and small
2023 FIRM REVENUE REVENUE REVENUE

1 JACOBS SOLUTIONS INC., Dallas, Texas 2,798.5 529.8 3,328.3

scope items,” he explains.
2 CBRE, Dallas, Texas 645.9 1,382.1 2,028.0 For Gardiner & Theobald, the value engineering
3 PARSONS CORP., Centreville, Va. 1,499.5 348.7 1,848.2 process begins with an efficiently designed building.
4 AECOM, Dallas, Texas 885.7 499.7 1,385.4 “Not only from a building structure and system point
5 BECHTEL, Reston, Va. 1,109.0 1.0 1,110.0 of view but also from a program and square footage
6 CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, Chicago, Ill. 353.0 497.6 850.6 perspective,” McCrow says. “The timing of procure-
7 HDR, Omaha, Neb. 243.8 166.9 410.6 ments has been critical—reading the market and buy-
8 SNC-LAVALIN GROUP, Tampa, Fla. 408.7 0.0 408.7 ing out the project at the right time with the right level
9 JLL, Chicago, Ill. 397.8 1.5 399.3 of information.”
10 WSP USA, New York, N.Y. 244.9 127.3 372.2 To combat the industry’s “poor” track record for
11 HORNE, Washington, D.C. 309.8 0.0 309.8 on-time delivery, McDonough Bolyard Peck President
12 BUREAU VERITAS, New York, N.Y. 125.9 139.7 265.6 and CEO Chris Payne says the company has found suc-
13 ANSER ADVISORY, Santa Ana, Calif. 260.8 2.5 263.3 cess in integrating data analytics to highlight schedule
14 CUMMING, Seattle, Wash. 216.8 41.3 258.0 trends in a more visible way for owners.
15 BURNS & MCDONNELL, Kansas City, Mo. 204.8 8.7 213.5 On the labor front, he says the firm needed to
16 APTIM, Baton Rouge, La. 178.8 0.0 178.7 change its thinking entirely, transitioning the respon-
17 IPS-INTEGRATED PROJECT SERVICES LLC, Blue Bell, Pa. 65.2 108.6 173.8 sibilities of one of its senior executives to solely focus
18 WORLEY, Houston, Texas 165.0 0.0 165.0 on employee recruitment and retention. “It’s no secret
19 ARCADIS NORTH AMERICA, Highlands Ranch, Colo. 162.9 0.0 162.9 that attracting, developing, and retaining talent is the
20 GARDINER & THEOBALD INC., New York, N.Y. 39.9 118.5 158.4
most critical issue in our industry and vital for our own
21 HILL INTERNATIONAL INC., Philadelphia, Pa. 121.8 32.7 154.5
growth” says Payne.
22 CDM SMITH, Boston, Mass. 116.6 0.0 116.6
As demand continues to outpace supply across the
23 LEIDOS, Reston, Va. 97.3 3.0 100.3
construction industry, “it’s about having the resources
24 TURNER & TOWNSEND, New York, N.Y. 98.1 0.0 98.1
to be able to continue our growth and controlling costs
25 SKANSKA USA, New York, N.Y. 89.2 0.0 89.2
around the supply chain,” says SNC Lavalin President
26 STANTEC INC., Irvine, Calif. 69.4 0.0 69.4
and CEO Ian L. Edwards. The company is ranked No.
27 THE RODERICK GROUP, Chicago, Ill. 69.0 0.0 69.0
8 in PM and No. 22 in CM.
28 LABELLA ASSOCIATES DPC, Rochester, N.Y. 65.4 0.0 65.4
29 KLEINFELDER, San Diego, Calif. 53.2 7.8 61.0
He adds that resourcing has become a “tremendous
30 CORDOBA CORP., Los Angeles, Calif. 57.6 0.0 57.6
challenge” for everyone. “It has an effect on our band-
31 PFES, Deerfield, Ill. 57.1 0.0 57.1
width and on our ability to support our clients and
32 BRAILSFORD & DUNLAVEY INC., Washington, D.C. 55.3 0.0 55.3 deliver all their projects,” Edwards explains. “Digitiza-
33 CAROLLO ENGINEERS, Walnut Creek, Calif. 49.1 0.0 49.1 tion and automation will be key to addressing this chal-
34 HUNT GUILLOT & ASSOCIATES LLC, Ruston, La. 48.1 0.0 48.6 lenge, helping us become as efficient as possible to make
35 PRO2SERVE, Oak Ridge, Tenn. 47.5 0.0 47.5 up for scarce human resources.”
36 HPM, Birmingham, Ala. 43.0 0.0 43.0
37 CSA GROUP, New York, N.Y. 38.0 0.0 38.7 Hot Markets
38 SEVAN MULTI-SITE SOLUTIONS LLC, Downers Grove, Ill. 35.8 2.8 38.7 Total revenue for the Top 100 CM/PM firms is up
39 PMA CONSULTANTS LLC, Ann Arbor, Mich. 37.7 0.0 37.7 6.34%, to $26.6 billion. Domestic revenue increased by
40 THE WEITZ CO. & AFFILIATES, Des Moines, Iowa 36.4 0.0 36.4 4.99% and international revenue saw an increase of
41 GILBANE BUILDING CO., Providence, R.I. 35.9 0.0 35.9 10.2%. Those revenue gains are spread throughout the
42 MGAC, Washington, D.C. 26.0 9.0 35.0 list, with Jacobs and Bechtel ranked No. 1 in PM and
43 LOCKWOOD ANDREWS & NEWNAM INC., Houston, Texas 34.9 0.0 34.9 CM, respectively.
44 BLACK & VEATCH, Overland Park, Kan. 14.8 19.3 34.1 Of the 92 ranked companies that filed for-fee rev-
45 THE VERTEX COS. INC., Weymouth, Mass. 32.3 0.0 32.3 enue both this year and last, 81.5% reported in-
46 FREESE AND NICHOLS INC., Fort Worth, Texas 31.9 0.0 31.9 creased revenue. Median Top 100 revenue is also up
47 KITCHELL CORP., Phoenix, Ariz. 31.8 0.0 31.8 36.24%, to $63.83 million. Last year, the top 10 firms
48 LEA+ELLIOTT INC., Grand Prairie, Texas 30.5 0.0 30.5 accounted for 70% of total Top 100 revenue. That
49 GREELEY AND HANSEN, Chicago, Ill. 30.2 0.0 30.2 dropped to 65% this year, the lowest share of revenue
50 DESIGN SYSTEMS INC., Farmington Hills, Mich. 29.4 0.0 29.4 over the past decade for the ten leading companies.

36 ■ ENR ■ June 26/July 3, 2023 enr.com

0703_Top_PSF_Overview.indd 36 6/27/23 4:14 PM

 HILL INTERNATIONAL will be an
#12 owner’s representative for the city of
Phoenix’s $2-billion aviation capital
improvement program.
OVERVIEW
OVERVIEW

For Cushman & Wakefield, growth has been sector The Top 50 Construction
specific, varying by clients, says Brian Ungles, project
and developmental services president. “We are hyper
Management Firms 2022 REVENUE IN $ MIL.
focused on the life sciences, health care and industrial/ RANK DOMESTIC INT’L TOTAL
2023 FIRM REVENUE REVENUE REVENUE
logistics sectors as well as the global outsourcing op- 1 BECHTEL, Reston, Va. 1,719.0 525.0 2,244.0
portunities.” 2 JLL, Chicago, Ill. 227.4 1,231.3 1,458.7
Ranked at No. 9 in PM and at No. 2 in CM, JLL 3 PARSONS CORP., Centreville, Va. 224.3 365.3 589.6
project and developmental services president Todd 4 THE LIRO GROUP, Syosset, N.Y. 502.0 0.0 502.0
Burns says the company has seen consistent growth in 5 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL GROUP INC., Encino, Calif. 54.8 369.8 424.6
both private and public health care in the U.S. South- 6 WSP USA, New York, N.Y. 350.9 0.0 351.2
Central region, which is growing the firm’s market 7 ATLAS TECHNICAL CONSULTANTS, Austin, Texas 283.0 0.0 283.0
share in the area. The company has also seen growth 8 HILL INTERNATIONAL INC., Philadelphia, Pa. 104.0 159.7 263.8
in manufacturing sector and sustainability consulting 9 ARCADIS NORTH AMERICA, Highlands Ranch, Colo. 208.9 0.0 209.0
services. 10 THE TURNER CORP., New York, N.Y. 45.1 111.2 156.3
“With both of these, JLL is seeing more complex 11 TURNER & TOWNSEND, New York, N.Y. 147.2 0.0 147.2
assignments that need a higher level of rigor and ex- 12 STV, New York, N.Y. 142.6 0.0 142.6
pertise,” says Burns. “As our clients have become more 13 AECOM, Dallas, Texas 138.7 0.0 139.0
cautious about expansion of internal teams, we’ve seen 14 BLACK & VEATCH, Overland Park, Kan. 121.9 16.6 138.5
a return to outsourcing driving an increase in the use 15 GILBANE BUILDING CO., Providence, R.I. 110.1 20.2 130.3
of third-party project management.” 16 GARDINER & THEOBALD INC., New York, N.Y. 32.6 97.0 129.6
17 CUMMING, Seattle, Wash. 95.6 25.5 121.0

Changing Needs 18 MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, Pittsburgh, Pa. 109.1 0.0 109.6

Despite a slight cooling of project starts brought on 19 FERROVIAL CONSTRUCTION US HOLDINGS CORP., Austin, Texas 101.0 0.0 101.0
20 HAZEN AND SAWYER, New York, N.Y. 93.2 0.0 93.2
by higher interest rates, “we continue to operate in a
21 GBA (GEORGE BUTLER ASSOCIATES), Lenexa, Kan. 91.3 0.0 91.3
highly competitive labor market,” says Cumming
22 SNC-LAVALIN GROUP, Tampa, Fla. 88.1 0.0 88.1
president and CEO Derek Hutchison. In addition to
23 CAROLLO ENGINEERS, Walnut Creek, Calif. 79.7 0.0 79.7
team member recruitment, development and reten-
24 KLEINFELDER, San Diego, Calif. 79.2 0.0 79.2
tion efforts being a priority, he says owners are driving
25 HUNTER ROBERTS CONSTRUCTION GROUP LLC, New York, N.Y. 79.0 0.0 79.0
operational changes based on needs such as a greater
26 THE VERTEX COS. INC., Weymouth, Mass. 76.3 1.5 77.8
focus on sustainability and environmental, social and
27 STANTEC INC., Irvine, Calif. 75.0 0.0 75.0
corporate governance (ESG) reporting policies.
28 MGAC, Washington, D.C. 60.0 15.0 75.0
“The questions today compared to two years ago 29 WALBRIDGE, Detroit, Mich. 72.6 0.0 72.6
focus on net zero carbon or net zero emissions and 30 WOOD PLC, Houston, Texas 72.6 0.0 72.6
operating businesses in terms of achieving established 31 PROJECT MANAGEMENT ADVISORS INC., Chicago, Ill. 67.1 1.0 68.1
climate goals,” says Hutchison. “With emergence of 32 M&J ENGINEERING, New Hyde Park, N.Y. 53.0 0.0 53.0
ESG reporting requirements domestically and globally, 33 KRAUS-ANDERSON, Minneapolis, Minn. 50.2 0.0 50.2
Cumming now advises our clients to develop ESG 34 MCDONOUGH BOLYARD PECK INC. (MBP), Fairfax, Va. 47.2 2.8 50.0
policies and compliance reporting [procedures]; and 35 BOWERS + KUBOTA CONSULTING INC., Waipahu, Hawaii 49.0 0.0 49.0
provides them with a portfolio of carbon reduction 36 SAVIN ENGINEERS PC, Pleasantville, N.Y. 48.8 0.0 48.8
options, including carbon offsets.” 37 VANIR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT INC., Sacramento, Calif. 47.8 0.0 47.8
To identify decarbonization opportunities, own- 38 KITCHELL CORP., Phoenix, Ariz. 42.2 0.0 42.2
ers are best served working with EPC contractors 39 TECTONIC ENG’G CONSULT. GEOLOGISTS & SURVEYORS, Mountainville, N.Y. 41.3 0.0 41.3
from the outset, says Bechtel in a statement, “to iden- 40 INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTING & ENGINEERING PLLC, West Columbia, S.C. 41.2 0.0 41.2
tify [and] simplify what is to be built, and then to 41 PSOMAS, Culver City, Calif. 40.2 0.0 40.2
eliminate the interfaces that cost money and slow 42 THE YATES COS. INC., Philadelphia, Miss. 38.1 0.0 38.1
down delivery.” 43 POWER ENGINEERS INC., Hailey, Idaho 38.1 0.0 38.1
On one hand, growing teams will increase labor 44 CORDOBA CORP., Los Angeles, Calif. 36.4 0.0 36.4
costs for projects. But firms need the extra hands to 45 BOSWELL ENGINEERING INC., South Hackensack, N.J. 36.3 0.0 36.3
amplify their capacity and be flexible in their manage- 46 OAC SERVICES INC., Seattle, Wash. 36.0 0.0 36.0
ment services, adds Gardiner & Theobald director Mc- 47 MWH, Broomfield, Colo. 34.8 0.0 34.8
Crow. “Making the absolute most of every opportunity 48 OTAK INC., Portland, Ore. 13.3 20.0 33.3
will be critical,” he says. ■ 49 EISMAN & RUSSO INC., Jacksonville, Fla. 32.2 0.0 32.2

By Emell Adolphus and Jonathan Keller 50 PROCON CONSULTING, Arlington, Va. 32.1 0.0 32.1

enr.com June 26/July 3, 2023 ■ ENR ■ 37

0703_Top_PSF_Overview.indd 37 6/27/23 4:15 PM

 THE TOP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRMS

Construction Management/PM-for-Fee Firms

2022 REVENUE IN $ MIL. 2022 REVENUE IN $ MIL.
RANK FIRM TOTAL REV. INT’L RANK FIRM TOTAL REV. INT’L
2023 2022 FIRM TYPE ($ MIL.) REVENUE 2023 2022 FIRM TYPE ($ MIL.) REVENUE
1 2 BECHTEL, Reston, Va. EAC 3,354.0 526.0 51 45 PMA CONSULTANTS LLC, Ann Arbor, Mich. E 62.3 0.0
2 1 JACOBS SOLUTIONS INC., Dallas, Texas EAC 3,328.3 529.8 52 50 FREESE AND NICHOLS INC., Fort Worth, Texas EA 60.9 0.0
3 4 PARSONS CORP., Centreville, Va. EC 2,437.7 714.0 53 56 PFES, Deerfield, Ill. E 57.1 0.0
4 3 CBRE, Dallas, Texas CM 2,028.0 1,382.1 54 44 MCDONOUGH BOLYARD PECK INC. (MBP), Fairfax, Va. O 56.5 5.2
5 5 JLL, Chicago, Ill. CM 1,858.0 1,232.8 55 53 BRAILSFORD & DUNLAVEY INC., Washington, D.C. O 55.3 0.0
6 6 AECOM, Dallas, Texas EAC 1,524.4 500.0 56 ** M&J ENGINEERING, New Hyde Park, N.Y. CM 53.0 0.0
7 8 CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, Chicago, Ill. CM 850.6 497.6 57 43 KRAUS-ANDERSON, Minneapolis, Minn. C 50.2 0.0
8 7 WSP USA, New York, N.Y. EAC 723.4 127.6 58 52 PRO2SERVE, Oak Ridge, Tenn. EC 49.7 0.0
9 19 THE LIRO GROUP, Syosset, N.Y. CM 502.0 0.0 59 46 BOWERS + KUBOTA CONSULTING INC., Waipahu, Hawaii AE 49.0 0.0
10 9 SNC-LAVALIN GROUP, Tampa, Fla. EAC 496.8 0.0 60 67 SAVIN ENGINEERS PC, Pleasantville, N.Y. CM 48.8 0.0
11 12 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL GROUP INC., Encino, Calif. CM 424.6 369.8 61 61 HUNT GUILLOT & ASSOCIATES LLC, Ruston, La. E 48.6 0.0
12 10 HILL INTERNATIONAL INC., Philadelphia, Pa. O 418.3 192.4 62 66 GHIRARDELLI ASSOCIATES INC., San Jose, Calif. E 45.1 0.0
13 14 HDR, Omaha, Neb. EAC 410.6 166.9 63 89 CHA CONSULTING INC. (CHA), Albany, N.Y. E 44.6 0.0
14 15 CUMMING, Seattle, Wash. CM 379.1 66.7 64 ** OTAK INC., Portland, Ore. EA 43.6 20.0
15 11 ARCADIS NORTH AMERICA, Highlands Ranch, Colo. EA 371.9 0.0 65 57 SEVAN MULTI-SITE SOLUTIONS LLC, Downers Grove, Ill. AE 43.2 3.3
16 16 ATLAS TECHNICAL CONSULTANTS, Austin, Texas E 311.0 0.0 66 64 HPM, Birmingham, Ala. CM 43.0 0.0
17 18 HORNE, Washington, D.C. CM 309.8 0.0 67 88 PATRICK ENGINEERING INC., Lisle, Ill. EC 41.7 0.0
18 17 GARDINER & THEOBALD INC., New York, N.Y. CM 288.0 215.5 68 63 TECTONIC ENG’G GEOLOGISTS & SURVEYORS, Mountainville, N.Y. E 41.3 0.0
19 13 BUREAU VERITAS, New York, N.Y. E 265.6 139.7 69 70 INFRA. CONSULTING & ENGINEERING PLLC, West Columbia , S.C. EA 41.2 0.0
20 21 ANSER ADVISORY, Santa Ana, Calif. O 263.3 2.5 70 82 CSA GROUP, New York, N.Y. AE 40.7 0.0
21 24 TURNER & TOWNSEND, New York, N.Y. CM 245.3 0.0 71 62 PSOMAS, Culver City, Calif. E 40.2 0.0
22 20 BURNS & MCDONNELL, Kansas City, Mo. O 213.5 8.7 72 ** CDI ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS, Houston, Texas AE 40.0 0.0
23 25 APTIM, Baton Rouge, La. C 178.7 0.0 73 ** COLLIERS ENGINEERING & DESIGN, Holmdel, N.J. EAC 39.2 0.0
24 48 IPS-INTEGRATED PROJECT SERVICES LLC, Blue Bell, Pa. AE 173.8 108.6 74 85 ATWELL LLC, Southfield, Mich. E 39.0 0.0
25 30 BLACK & VEATCH, Overland Park, Kan. EC 172.6 35.9 75 ** THE YATES COS. INC., Philadelphia, Miss. EC 38.2 0.0
26 28 GILBANE BUILDING CO., Providence, R.I. C 166.2 20.2 76 93 POWER ENGINEERS INC., Hailey, Idaho E 38.1 0.0
27 39 WORLEY, Houston, Texas EC 165.0 0.0 77 55 MWH, Broomfield, Colo. C 37.5 0.0
28 22 THE TURNER CORP., New York, N.Y. C 156.3 111.2 78 80 LOCKWOOD ANDREWS & NEWNAM INC., Houston, Texas EA 37.0 0.0
29 27 STANTEC INC., Irvine, Calif. AE 144.4 0.0 79 69 THE WEITZ CO. & AFFILIATES, Des Moines, Iowa C 36.4 0.0
30 33 STV, New York, N.Y. AE 142.6 0.0 80 73 BOSWELL ENGINEERING INC., South Hackensack, N.J. E 36.3 0.0
31 34 KLEINFELDER, San Diego, Calif. E 140.2 7.8 81 68 OAC SERVICES INC., Seattle, Wash. O 36.0 0.0
32 29 CAROLLO ENGINEERS, Walnut Creek, Calif. E 128.8 0.0 82 100 ATCS, Herndon, Va. E 35.3 0.0
33 31 HAZEN AND SAWYER, New York, N.Y. E 119.7 0.0 83 75 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES INC., Concord, Calif. CM 34.9 0.0
34 26 CDM SMITH, Boston, Mass. EC 116.6 0.0 84 74 GREELEY AND HANSEN, Chicago, Ill. E 33.2 0.0
35 35 THE VERTEX COS. INC., Weymouth, Mass. E 110.1 1.5 85 77 EISMAN & RUSSO INC., Jacksonville, Fla. CM 32.2 0.0
36 37 MGAC, Washington, D.C. O 110.0 24.0 86 95 PROCON CONSULTING, Arlington, Va. O 32.1 0.0
37 32 MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, Pittsburgh, Pa. EA 109.6 0.0 87 ** MNS ENGINEERS INC., Santa Barbara, Calif. E 32.0 0.0
38 ** FERROVIAL CONSTRUCTION US HOLDINGS CORP., Austin, Texas C 101.0 0.0 88 58 GREENMAN-PEDERSEN INC. (GPI), Babylon, N.Y. E 31.8 0.0
39 ** LEIDOS, Reston, Va. E 100.3 3.0 89 99 AOA, Winter Park, Fla. CM 31.5 1.7
40 38 CORDOBA CORP., Los Angeles, Calif. E 94.0 0.0 90 91 CRB, Kansas City, Mo. AE 31.4 0.0
41 94 GBA (GEORGE BUTLER ASSOCIATES), Lenexa, Kan. EAC 91.3 0.0 91 84 SAM LLC, Austin, Texas E 31.2 0.0
42 23 SKANSKA USA, New York, N.Y. C 89.2 0.0 92 60 HENDERSON COS., Lenexa, Kan. E 31.0 0.0
43 76 HUNTER ROBERTS CONSTRUCTION GROUP LLC, New York, N.Y. C 79.0 0.0 93 78 LEA+ELLIOTT INC., Grand Prairie, Texas E 30.5 0.0
44 42 KITCHELL CORP., Phoenix, Ariz. EC 74.0 0.0 94 87 ENTECH ENGINEERING PC, New York, N.Y. E 29.8 0.0
45 ** WALBRIDGE, Detroit, Mich. AE 72.6 0.0 95 79 DESIGN SYSTEMS INC., Farmington Hills, Mich. E 29.4 0.0
46 ** WOOD PLC, Houston, Texas E 72.6 0.0 96 83 GAFCON INC., San Diego, Calif. CM 29.2 0.0
47 41 VANIR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT INC., Sacramento, Calif. O 72.5 0.0 97 ** HORROCKS ENGINEERS, Pleasant Grove, Utah E 26.7 0.0
48 54 THE RODERICK GROUP, Chicago, Ill. EC 69.0 0.0 98 97 MCKISSACK & MCKISSACK, Washington, D.C. A 26.3 0.0
49 49 PROJECT MANAGEMENT ADVISORS INC., Chicago, Ill. CM 68.1 1.0 99 98 CPM, Guaynabo, Puerto Rico CM 25.6 0.0
50 47 LABELLA ASSOCIATES DPC, Rochester, N.Y. EAC 65.4 0.0 100 92 KS ENGINEERS PC, Newark, N.J. E 25.0 0.0
COMPANIES ARE RANKED BASED ON TOTAL 2022 REVENUE IN $ MILLIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION-MANAGEMENT OR PROJECT/PROGRAM-MANAGEMENT SERVICES PERFORMED AS A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE FOR A FEE. **=NOT RANKED IN
2022 AMONG THE TOP 100 CMS. KEY TO TYPE OF FIRM: A=ARCHITECT; C=CONTRACTOR; CM=CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FIRM; E=ENGINEER; EC=ENGINEER-CONTRACTOR; O=OTHER. OTHER COMBINATIONS ARE POSSIBLE.

38 ■ ENR ■ June 26/July 3, 2023 enr.com

0703_TopPSF_List.indd 38 6/27/23 12:10 PM