Philippine Trade Facilitation Roadmap
Philippine Trade Facilitation Roadmap
The ratification of the World Trade Organization - Trade Facilitation Agreement (WTO-TFA) in October 2016
strengthened the Philippines resolve to foster reforms that facilitate cross-border trade, streamline and improve During the 2nd meeting to the Technical Working Groups (TWGs) of the PTFC, the vision
customs procedures, facilitate the implementation of rational, efficient, and simplified customs and border statement of the Roadmap was formulated as follows:
management rules, and improve the flow, discharge, and clearance of goods across borders. In compliance with
its commitments under the WTO-TFA, the Philippines issued Executive Order (EO) No. 136, s. 2021 in May 2021, which
created the Philippine Trade Facilitation Committee or the PTFC. The PTFC will act as the official “National Trade “Rise above the TIDES”
Facilitation Committee (NTFC) ” of the country and is mandated to provide the mechanism/s to facilitate both
domestic coordination and implementation of the provisions of the WTO-TFA. It will also assist in reducing trade By 2028, the Philippines will empower people and businesses by providing a world-class
transaction costs, and enable micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) to participate more actively in
international trade and broaden their participation in regional and global value chains. international trade gateway through Transparent, Inclusive, Digital, Efficient, and Secure
customs and trade procedures.
To implement the mandate of the PTFC, its member-agencies developed this Roadmap covering a six-year
period from 2022-2028, based on six (6) identified Key Reform Areas (KRAs). These KRAs inform the PTFC’s vision
towards achieving an inclusive and sustainable trade facilitation response, while fostering better cross-border trade
This will be achieved through high levels of collaboration between the government &
standards and procedure. These are as follows: the private sector, implementation of streamlined procedures and provision of a fully
automated trading environment. This will result in reduced transaction time and cost for
1. Stakeholder Engagement
2. Inter-agency Coordination
the trading community, high levels of compliance with the law, and enable MSMEs to
3. Technology Infrastructure participate more actively in international trade and contribute to sustained economic
4. Legal and Regulatory Framework growth.
5. Emergency Response Measures
6. Support to MSMEs
The KRAs were drawn from, and considered: (a) the WTO-TFA Philippine Assessment Report (July 2021) conducted
by the World Bank Group (the “WB Assessment Report”) on the current status of the Philippine’s implementation of
the WTO-TFA; (b) the results of the 2019 time release study conducted by the Bureau of Customs (BOC), which
assessed its current needs and existing challenges; and (c) stakeholder inputs from the BOC PTFC Stakeholders’
Consultation in 2021.
In addition, the new challenges brought on by the pandemic, and similar emergencies, exposed not only existing
gaps in current border processes, procedures and facilities, but also the vulnerabilities of micro, small and medium-
sized enterprises (MSMEs). To address these, the Roadmap incorporates a range of trade facilitation measures
developed to respond to emergencies, crises, or pandemics (e.g. COVID-19), as well as initiatives, future goals and
a series of activities to support MSMEs.
The outline of the strategy for each Key Reform Area for the 6-year period from 2022- 2028 will be discussed in the
next section. Each area defines a strategic vision for trade facilitation that advances cross-border paperless trade
through the development of information and communication technology (ICT) tools; promotes the streamlining
of customs and border management procedures through simplification and harmonization; encourages traders’
compliance in the areas of valuation, tariff classification, import and export controls (through permits and licenses);
and maximizes the utilization of international trade agreements.
Through the implementation of the measures set out in this Roadmap, by 2028 the PTFC aims to achieve: (i) full
implementation of the six (6) Trade Facilitation Key Reform Areas; (ii) increase its trade facilitation score to at least 90
% in the UN Global Survey on Digital and Sustainable Trade Facilitation; and (iii) achieve full paperless transactions
for export and import of essential goods.
1 Article 23.2. “National Committee on Trade Facilitation” Each Member shall establish and/or maintain a national committee on trade facilitation or designate an
existing mechanism to facilitate both domestic coordination and implementation of the provisions of this Agreement.
The Philippine Trade Facilitation Committee (PTFC) Roadmap 2022 - 2028 6 7 The Philippine Trade Facilitation Committee (PTFC) Roadmap 2022 - 2028
Vice Chairperson: Bureau of Customs (BOC) The PTFC is composed of the following Technical Working Groups (TWGs) tasked to implement the
following mandates of the PTFC:
Members: Department of Agriculture (DA)
Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) • Compliance Monitoring TWG which is tasked to monitor the pending compliances
National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA) of the Philippines with the WTO-TFA with particular focus on the progress of the NSW;
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR)
Department of Transportation (DoTr) • Trade Policy Review TWG which is tasked to review redundancies and gaps concerning the
Tariff Commission (TC) implementation of trade facilitation commitments and recommend to government agencies and
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) committees measures to facilitate trade, and
DTI-Bureau of International Trade Relations (DTI-BITR)
DTI-Bureau of Import Services (DTI-BIS) • Ad Hoc TWG, which is constituted to draft an Operational Work Plan and Strategy
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Road Map, which shall include, among others, all the activities, actions to be taken,
Philippine Economic Zone Authority (PEZA) and other matters necessary in the effective discharge of the functions of the PTFC.
Under Section 2 of EO No. 136, PTFC shall have the following responsibilities: The PTFC is assisted by the PTFC Secretariat, composed of existing personnel from the Bureau of Customs
which provides administrative and technical support to the Committee.
1. Study, propose and coordinate the position, activities, or actions of the Philippine Government on matters
pertaining to the implementation of the WTO-TFA and other trade facilitation commitments; 3.3. Meetings and Related Activities
2. Represent and advance the interests of the Philippines in meetings on the implementation of the WTO-TFA 3.3.1. PTFC Meetings
and other trade facilitation commitments; • The 1st PTFC Meeting was held on 16 June 2021 and presided by the Secretary of Finance as the Chairman
of the Philippine Trade Facilitation Committee (PTFC). During the meeting, the BOC and World Bank briefed
3. Call on the assistance of and coordinate with relevant government agencies and stakeholders on various the PTFC on the WTO-TFA Commitments and Roles of the NTFC in other countries. The PTFC likewise adopted
trade and trade-related concerns covered by the WTO-TFA and other trade facilitation commitments; the nominated representatives to the PTFC, the proposed Technical Working Groups (TWGs) and its Business
Arrangement.
4. Submit appropriate and timely reports on the compliance of the Philippines with the WTO-TFA and other
trade facilitation commitments; • The 2nd PTFC Meeting was held on 14 September 2021 and presided over by Undersecretary Antonette
C. Tionko of the Department of Finance as the Principal Representative of the PTFC Chairman. During said
5. Propose to the NEDA Board Committee on Tariff and Related Matters (CTRM) trade regulations, measures, meeting, the World Bank presented the initial Trade Facilitation Gap Analysis while the BOC presented its
and practices which are consistent with the objectives of the WTO-TFA and other trade facilitation Time Release Study. The PTFC also adopted the minutes of the 1st PTFC Meeting, the Structure and Members
commitments, to expedite movement, release, and clearance of goods; of its TWGs, the PTFC Operational Workplan and the PTFC Key Reform Areas.
6. Undertake outreach, advocacy, capacity-building, and studies among its members and stakeholders to • The 3rd PTFC Meeting was held on 28 January 2022 and presided over by Undersecretary Antonette C.
increase awareness of the practices and benefits of trade facilitation; Tionko of the Department of Finance as the Principal Representative of the PTFC Chairman. During said
meeting, the Compliance Monitoring and Trade Policy Review Technical Working Group presented their
7. In coordination with the Anti-Red Tape Authority, ensure compliance with Republic Act (RA) No. 11032 accomplishments and initiatives. The PTFC Secretariat likewise presented the updates on the status of the
or the “Ease of Doing Business and Efficient Government Service Delivery Act of 2018” in relation to trade WTO-TFA Compliance vis-à-vis the PTFC Key Reform Areas and the progress of the drafting of the PTFC
facilitation; Roadmap. The World Bank and the European Union – ASEAN Regional Integration Support (EU-ARISE) also
shared the updates to their technical assistance to the PTFC and its Secretariat.
8. Report regularly to the NEDA Board CTRM and seek approval on matters relevant to the functioning of the
Committee, as may be necessary; and
The Philippine Trade Facilitation Committee (PTFC) Roadmap 2022 - 2028 8 9 The Philippine Trade Facilitation Committee (PTFC) Roadmap 2022 - 2028
3.3.2. Joint PTFC TWG Meetings and Workshops. However, full and effective implementation of the WTO-TFA is constrained by incomplete, or inadequate:
• PTFC TWG Writeshop for the PTFC Operational Workplan held on July 15-16, 2021 where the PTFC Operational (a) regulations providing for policies or guidelines consistent with the TFA requirements, (b) institutional
Workplan was drafted with the assistance of the International Trade Center under the EU-ARISE Plus Project; mechanisms, and/or (c) technology infrastructure designed to implement these trade facilitation measures.
Examples of these are the lack of formal procedures across all agencies for stakeholder consultations, limited
• 1st PTFC TWG Meeting and Writeshop held July 30, 2021 where the draft PTFC operational workplan was alignment of clearance procedures among border agencies, and the varying levels of development or
completed and subsequently adopted on the 2nd PTFC Meeting held 14 September 2021. enhancements of information and communications technology (“ICT”) systems within the Bureau of Customs
(“BOC”) and other border management agencies.
• UNCTAD’s Global Forum 2022 for National Trade Facilitation Committees held 1-4 February 2022
4.1.2. Adoption of WTO-TFA+ Measures
• 2nd PTFC TWG Meeting and Writeshop held March 15-16, 2022 where the draft Roadmap for the PTFC was
drafted. The 2021 Digital and Sustainable Trade Facilitation in Asia and the Pacific Survey of the UN Regional
Commissions (the “UN Trade Facilitation Survey”), on the other hand, gave the Philippines a trade facilitation
• Capacity Building Workshop for the Philippines Trade Facilitation Committee (PTFC): Bringing Private and score of 86.02% in the various trade facilitation indicators measured.
Public Sector Perspective Together on the Trade Facilitation Agreement held 7-8 April 2022
The UN Trade Facilitation Survey measures the progress of surveyed economies in implementing trade
facilitation reforms that cover both binding and non-binding WTO-TFA measures and trade facilitation
3.3.3. Meetings of the PTFC TWGs measures beyond the scope of the WTO-TFA (“WTO-TFA+”). It is composed of 58 trade facilitation measures
that are classified into four groups: (a) General Trade Facilitation; (b) Digital Trade Facilitation; (c) Sustainable
i. Compliance Monitoring TWG Trade Facilitation; and (d) Other Trade Facilitation. The four groups are further sub-divided into 11 sub-groups.2
• 28 October 2021 - First Regular Meeting of the CMTWG where the Terms Under the Transparency and Formalities sub-group, the Philippines scored 100%, while it scored 85.19%
of Reference and CMTWG Annual Workplan were adopted for Paperless Trade, 83.30% in Agricultural Trade Facilitation, and 77.78% for Institutional Arrangement and
• 11February 2022 – Second Regular Meeting of the CMTWG where updates Cooperation. It scored relatively low in Cross-Border Paperless Trade, at 61.11%, and in Trade Facilitation for
on Trade Facilitation Agreements and Engagements were presented and SMEs and Women in Trade Facilitation, both at 33.30%.
discussed.
Figure 1. General, Digital and Sustainable Trade Facilitation Scores
ii. Trade Policy Review TWG
• 16 September 2022 - First Regular Meeting of the CMTWG where the Terms
of Reference and CMTWG Annual Workplan were adopted
• 18 March 2022 - Second Regular Meeting of the CMTWG where the Terms
of Reference and CMTWG Annual Workplan were adopted
• 17 March 2022 – First Ad Hoc TWG Meeting for the drafting of the PTFC
Roadmap
• 24 March 2022 – Second Ad Hoc TWG Meeting for the drafting of the PTFC
Roadmap
• 31 March 2022 – Second Ad Hoc TWG Meeting for the drafting of the PTFC
Roadmap
Up to 61 percent of domestic firms in Thailand are exporters, while 78.7 percent of foreign firms in Vietnam, 84 percent
No. Measure PHL Performance
in Malaysia and 93 percent in Thailand, directly or indirectly export. Furthermore, domestic firms in the Philippines export
1 Agency in place to manage TF in times of crisis and emergencies Partially implemented only 3.5 percent of their output, compared to 26 percent in Malaysia and Thailand.
2 Online publication of emergency TF measures Fully implemented
Figure 3. The share of exports in GDP has been worsening
3 Coordination between countries on emergency TF measures Fully implemented
4 Additional TF measures to facilitate trade in times of emergencies Partially implemented
5 Plan in place to facilitate trade during future crises Fully implemented
Source: UN Global Survey on Digital and Sustainable Trade Facilitation, untfsurvey.org
The Philippines compares relatively better in the implementation of trade facilitation measures in times of crisis
compared to the average performance of Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (“ESCAP”) and
Southeast Asian (“SEA”) countries.
Figure 2. Philippines compared to ESCAP and SEA countries
Results from the 2018 Logistics Performance Index highlight the low efficiency of the clearance process by border
agencies (2.53/5), including Customs, together with the low quality of trade and transport infrastructure (2.73/5). The
resulting high trade costs hinder the country’s export competitiveness and ability to create high quality jobs. This is
especially important as the Philippines handles the 26th largest volume of container traffic in the world.
Compared with other SEA countries, the Philippine performance in 2018 and its aggregate performance in the 2012,
2014, 2016 and 2018 Logistics Performance Index (LPI) in efficiency of customs and border management clearance (2018:
2.53/5; Aggregate: 2.62/5) lag behind 6 of the 10 ASEAN economies, to wit: Brunei Darussalam (2018: 2.62/5; Aggregate:
2.7/5), Indonesia (2018: 2.67/5; Aggregate: 2.69/5), Malaysia (2018: 2.9; Aggregate: 3.06/5), Singapore (2018: 3.89/5;
Aggregate: 4/5), Thailand (2018: 3.14/5; Aggregate: 3.13/5) and Vietnam (2018: 2.95/5; Aggregate: 2.86/5).
Source: UN Global Survey on Digital and Sustainable Trade Facilitation, untfsurvey.org
However, the measures that the Philippines have only partially implemented during the pandemic, i. e., Agency
Figure 4. Philippine performance in LPI-Customs compared to ASEAN countries
in place to manage TF in times of crisis and emergencies; and Additional TF measures to facilitate trade in times of
emergencies, are crucial in ensuring the country’s resilient recovery and long-term preparedness for future crisis. Thus,
more work is needed to ensure the Philippines’ preparedness for crisis and emergencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
4.2. Assessment of the Pre-COVID-19 Trade Facilitation Scenario
Growth rates of both exports and overall trade in the Philippines have been among the lowest in the region. The share
of exports in GDP declined from 51 percent in 2000 to 32 percent in 2018. In comparison, Vietnam’s exports increased from
54 percent of GDP in 2000 to 106 percent in 2018. Furthermore, the Philippines’ export basket has not changed substantially
over the past decade. A product-space analysis reveals that the range of products exported by the Philippines has
remained broadly constant over time. This is in comparison to other ASEAN countries that have successfully diversified
their exports.
Most of the country’s exports are intermediate goods with low added value. In 2014, 83 percent of the country’s
export products were from the manufacturing sector. Half of these manufacturing exports were heavily import dependent
electronic products, of which most were components, devices and semiconductors, with low value-addition. The
domestic manufacturing sector remains limited to labor intensive and low-skill activities. There are few incentives in place
Source: Logistics Performance Index, lpi.worldbank.org; 2018 Logistics Performance Index
to innovate, upgrade technology, and achieve scale in domestic manufacturing.
The share of firms exporting in the Philippines is relatively low. Based on enterprise survey data, just 6.9 percent of In the quality of trade and transport infrastructure of the LPI, the Philippines (2018: 2.73/5; 2.67/5) is outpaced by the
domestic firms and 25.5 percent of foreign firms in the Philippines directly or indirectly export goods and services, far fewer following 5 SEA countries: Indonesia (2018: 2.89/5; Aggregate: 2.81/5); Malaysia (2018: 2.15/5; Aggregate: 3.3/5); Singapore
than in peer countries. (2018: 4.06/5; Aggregate: 4.14/5); Thailand (3.14/5; Aggregate: 3.17/5); and Vietnam (2018: 3.01/5; Aggregate: 2.92/5).
The Philippine Trade Facilitation Committee (PTFC) Roadmap 2022 - 2028 12 13 The Philippine Trade Facilitation Committee (PTFC) Roadmap 2022 - 2028
Figure 5. Philippine performance in LPI-Customs compared to ASEAN countries the lack of trucking services, closed warehouses, and others.3 The private sector also had issues with non-tariff measures
(NTMs) because of the delays in obtaining permits and licenses from trade regulatory government agencies (TRGAs) due
to ECQ restrictions.4
For example, manual and cumbersome processes for securing Licenses to Operate (LTO) and Certificates of Product
Registration (CPR) from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) stalled the importation of essential medical supplies
and equipment necessary to combat COVID-19. Technical problems in the import processing system at the ports further
exacerbated the problem. Coordination with the Philippine Economic Zone Authority (PEZA) for importations through its
registered enterprises and securing the necessary permits from the Department of Agriculture (DA) have also become
more challenging than it was before.
This further highlights and confirms the findings of the UN Trade Facilitation Survey of the Philippines’ partial
implementation of measures designed to address crisis and emergencies, such as the Covid-19 pandemic. In addition,
inadequate mechanisms for inter-agency coordination among border agencies noted under the WB Assessment Report
were brought into focus during the pandemic.
While applicable laws allow the acceptance of electronic supporting documents required for import, export, or transit
formalities, BOC and other border agencies such as BPS, BPI, BAI, and NMIS generally require submission of the original
hard copies of these documents at a later time.
Applicable laws do not provide for the acceptance of paper copies of required supporting documents.
As part of its commitments under the Revised Kyoto Convention, the Philippines passed Republic Act No. 10863, or the
Customs Modernization and Tariff Act (CMTA) in May 2016. The CMTA seeks to modernize customs administration through
the adoption of nternational best practices
practices in trade facilitation and the use of ICT to improve efficiency in the operations and transactions of customs and Further, the TRS also showed that the delay, if any, in the release of shipment was not within the customs jurisdiction but
border agencies in the Philippines. actually occurs before the formal lodgment of the declarations, which is considered as pre-customs, as well as after the
BoC’s online release to the arrastre, which is considered as post customs.
Implementing regulations under the CMTA have been adopted on a staggered basis since the effectivity of the law
in 2017. Some trade facilitation technical measures are supported by guidelines and procedures that provide a basis for 4.8. Implementation status of the WTO-TFA
implementation, while others remain general provisions in the CMTA, or general laws, with no or insufficient guidelines for
implementation. .The Bureau of Customs has been aligning itself with the World Customs Organization Mercator Programme, aimed
at assisting governments worldwide to implement TFA measures. This program embodies the International Customs
The CMTA is further complemented and strengthened by Republic Act No. 11032 or the Ease of Doing Business and community’s strong commitment to trade facilitation following a structure and harmonized approach.
Efficient Government Service Delivery Act (EODB Act) of 2018. The EODB Act requires the simplification of requirements
and procedures to reduce red tape and expedite business and non-business related transactions with the government. As of 31 December 2021, 16 out of the 27 Mercator Recommendations or around 87.76% have been completed since
its implementation on 2019.
4.7. Time to export and import
5.0 TRADE FACILITATION KEY REFORM AREAS
The BoC has conducted and completed its 2020 and 2021 Time Release Studies (TRS) in various ports in the country to
determine bottlenecks on cargo clearance and release time. 5.1. Description of the Trade Facilitation Key Reform Areas
The TRS showed the average time for processing of imported cargo by the BoC from Inward Foreign Manifest (IFM) 5.1.1. Stakeholder Engagement
registration to exit the port terminal in all of these ports: By 2028 the Philippines shall have strong stakeholder engagement through the following:
• MICP 2 days and 36 minutes • Prior to the issuance of any regulation, each regulatory agency is required to conduct
• POM 2 days, 9 hours, 44 minutes, and 48 seconds a Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) including at least one (1) public consultation and
• Davao 2 days, 15 hours, 37 minutes, and 11 seconds the online posting of the draft regulation in the agencies’ respective websites for
• MCT 1 day, 17 hours, 10 minutes, and 55 seconds comments.
• Zamboanga There was no containerized cargo that arrived in Zamboanga during the • The PTFC shall establish a single point of inquiry through a dedicated hotline which shall
TRS period. provide a response within the prescribed period from the relevant agency.
• Cebu 4 days, 7 hours, and 17 minutes • The PTFC will establish a Multi Sectoral Advisory Council (MSAC) that will meet at least
• Clark 5 days, 12 hours, and 55 minutes once a month and more frequently as needed.
• Subic 2 days, 12 hours, and 11 minutes
• NAIA 3 days, 11 hours, and 35 minutes 5.1.2. Inter-agency Coordination
• Batangas 5 days, 2 hours, 9 minutes, and 50 seconds
• Iloilo 2 days, 1 hour, and 24 minutes By 2028, the Philippines will achieve a strong inter-agency coordination through the
• Legaspi 14 hours and 21 minutes exchange and sharing of information, the establishment of a One Stop Shop with shared
• Limay 22 hours, 57 minutes, and 15 seconds facilities for joint inspection and control, and the full operationalization of the NSW.
• San Fernando 2 days, 2 hours, and 8 minutes
• Surigao 5 days, 18 hours, and 33 minutes 5.1.3. Technology Infrastructure
For exports, the findings presented processing of shipments from submission of Export Declaration through Portal to the By 2028, the Philippines will have developed, implemented, and sustained a fully inter-
issuance of clearance, with the time average as follows: operable ICT infrastructure for registration, accreditation, payment, lodgment and
processing of import, export and transit documents, joint risk management to support
• MICP 4 hours, 45 minutes, and 51 seconds pre-arrival processing, efficient clearance and release of goods.
• POM 1 day, 21 hours, 1 minute, and 3 seconds
• Davao 21 hours, 21 minutes, and 9 seconds 5.1.4. Legal and Regulatory Framework
• MCT 19 hours, 6 minutes, and 13 seconds
• Zamboanga 3 days, 15 hours, 28 minutes, and 21 seconds By 2028, the Philippines has adopted institutional mechanisms that expedite processing,
• Cebu 1 day, 12 hours, 29 minutes clearance, and release of goods for compliant traders consistent with Regional and
• Clark 10 minutes International obligations. This will be achieved through:
• Subic 56 minutes and 40 seconds
• NAIA 11 minute and 40 seconds • Streamlined trade procedures and harmonized rules for issuance of permits and
• Aparri 6 days, 17 hours and 37 minutes clearance of goods
• Batangas 14 hours and 6 minutes • Integrated risk management framework across all agencies
• Iloilo 2 hours and 13 minutes • Fully institutionalized provisional goods declaration
• Legaspi 4 days, 16 hours, and 34 minutes • Facilitated release of goods through expedited mechanism for all modes of transport
• Limay 5 hours and 32 minutes • Institutionalized Time Release Studies
• San Fernando 17 hours, 54 minutes, and 40 seconds • Clear and expedited procedures for administrative appeals with strict timelines that are published in their
• Surigao 2 days, 15 hours, and 8 minutes respective citizen’s charters
• Tacloban 20 hours and 26 minutes
The Philippine Trade Facilitation Committee (PTFC) Roadmap 2022 - 2028 16 17 The Philippine Trade Facilitation Committee (PTFC) Roadmap 2022 - 2028
MEDIUM-TERM ACTIVITIES
5.3. Targets, Performance Indicators and Baselines
Stakeholder Engagement
Outcome Activities Responsible Agency Stakeholder Engagement
Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) • Identify participants for RIA Training • PTFC
• RIA Training • ARTA Outcome Performance Indicators Means of Veriification Baseline Target
• Concerned Agency Regulatory • Number of capacity building •Post activity reports Establish 100%
Impact workshops submitted to the PTFC together
Assessment (RIA) • Percent of border and trade Secretariat with ARTA
Inter-agency Coordination
agencies trained •Regulatory impact
Outcome Activities Responsible Agency • Number of trade regulations statements submitted
One Stop Border post controls and • Draft JMU • PTFC that undergone RIA to ARTA
sharing of common facilities through • Pilot testing at PEZA Zones • Bureau of Customs • RIA quality (for consultation with
Joint Memorandum of Understanding • Identification of agencies • Regulatory agencies ARTA)
among concerned agencies • Sourcing for funds • PPA
Public • Number of sectors consulted • Establish together N/A 100%
Consultation (MSMEs, Importer/Exporter, with TRGAs
Technology Infrastructure agriculture, consumer group) • Number of views and
Outcome Activities Responsible Agency • Percent of proposed regulation comments, and
Full operationalization of new Customs PTFC to issue directive to BOC to review existing • PTFC CMTWG posted online for consultation or reactions
Processing System (CPS) systems in preparation for full integration of • BOC comments
customs processing system
Hotline • Regulation establishing the • Published regulation 0 100%
trade facilitation hotline • Inquiries addressed
Legal and Regulatory Framework
• Number inquiries satisfactorily within the prescribed
Outcome Activities Responsible Agency resolved period vs inquiries
Appeals • Draft policy first on hotline PTFC-CMTWG • Percent of agencies received
• Inventory of existing hotlines interconnected • Customer satisfaction
• Training and hiring of hotline personnel (survey)
• Prepare a directory of all hotline
Support to MSMEs Multi Sectoral • PTFC Resolution establishing the • PTFC Resolution issued N/A Fully-
Advisory Council MSAC • Number of sectors functional
Outcome Activities Responsible Agency
(MSAC) • Balanced representation of comprising MSAC MSAC
Regular consultation between Develop a coordination mechanism with the • DTI-EMB members from public and (MSMEs, Importer/
government agencies and that focus Export Development Council and MSME Council • DTI-BSMED private sectors Exporter, agriculture,
on the particular needs of MSMEs for the regular consultation • Frequency of meetings consumer group, and
• Number of MSAC resolutions other agencies)
Increase MSME’s awareness and •Assessment of the PNTR focusing on its accuracy, DTI-BIS PNTR Secretariat • Minutes of the
utilization of timely trade information in timeliness, activeness of link websites and and other TRGAs meeting
portal/tools available online relevance to users of information
•Following the assessments, provide
recommendations for improvement
•Promotion of the PNTR to the potential users
• Awareness and accessibility of MSMEs
to the Tradenet platform
The Philippine Trade Facilitation Committee (PTFC) Roadmap 2022 - 2028 20 21 The Philippine Trade Facilitation Committee (PTFC) Roadmap 2022 - 2028
Raymond L. Cajayon
Department of Trade and Industry - Deputy Commissioner
Director Maria Guiza B. Lim
Bureau of Import Services Assessment and Operations
Coordinating Group
Merlita B. Pedron
Samuel A. Zacate, M.D. Division Chief
Food and Drug Administration
Director General Monitoring and Evaluation
Division