Post-Marketing Quality Assessment of Paracetamol Brands in The Libyan Market
Post-Marketing Quality Assessment of Paracetamol Brands in The Libyan Market
Original article
Copyright © 2023 Almdaaf et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract: Paracetamol is one of the most found over the counter drugs worldwide. It is widely used as an
analgesic and antipyretic drug. Many commercial types of paracetamol tablets are available under different
brand names in the Libyan drug market. The present study was conducted to evaluate post-marketing quality
parameters for three brands of paracetamol tablets marketed in Libya. All three brands were evaluated for
weight variation, hardness, friability, disintegration time and uniformity of content following British
pharmacopeia guidelines. The outcomes of this study showed all tested brands complied with the British
pharmacopeia specifications for the weight variation test, friability test (0.05%-0.17%), and hardness test
(171.3N-197.6 N). In addition, two brands passed the British pharmacopeia requirements for the disintegration
time test, whereas one brand exceeded the allowed disintegration time by about five minutes. Furthermore,
high performance liquid chromatography was used to determine paracetamol content. Although the average
amount of paracetamol drug available in these brands is not very close to 100%, where one brand achieved
the lowest value (438.1 mg), the loaded dose of paracetamol in selected tablets in the three brands was within
the British pharmacopeia standard specifications for the uniformity content test. Therefore, it can be concluded
that almost all the three tested brands of paracetamol tablets that are available in the Libyan drug market meet
the British pharmacopeia specification for quality control analysis.
Almdaaf et al. (2023) Mediterr J Pharm Pharm Sci. 3(4): 73-79. 73-79
Mediterranean Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences
www.medjpps.com ISSN: 2789-1895 online ISSN: 2958-3101 print
disease [6]. Hence, post-market evaluations can be paracetamol tablets marketed in the Yemeni
used to judge the approved drug products for their market. The findings showed all brands of
safety, efficacy and quality. Fake drugs are paracetamol comply with British Pharmacopeia/
becoming a big public health problem as either they United State Pharmacopeia (BP/USP)
lose adequate efficacy or they have toxicity [7, 8]. specifications for in vitro quality control tests,
The prevalence of fake drugs is higher in countries except the hardness test, which is referred to as a
with weak regulations, enforcement, and non-official test. The study concluded that the
insufficiency of supply of basic drugs, also, overall quality of all tested brands of paracetamol
unregulated drug markets and unreasonable drug was acceptable. Furthermore, Sahle and others [16]
prices [9]. conducted an exclusively experimental study that
used BP/USP to evaluate the in vitro quality of
Paracetamol, is a widely used the analgesic and
paracetamol marketed in the Somali region of
antipyretic drug all over the world. Long-term
Ethiopia. The outcomes showed all of the brands
application and/or overdoses of paracetamol may
were within the specification for the weight
cause potentially fatal liver damage and/or renal
variation test. Nevertheless, from the illegal import
functioning disorder [10]. Successful therapeutic
brands, two for friability, one for disintegration and
efficiency of oral solid dosage forms, including
all for percentage of drug content failed to satisfy
tablets, depends mainly on the quality of a series of
the standards. The study has concluded that the
parameters, such as weight variation, hardness,
quality of illegal paracetamol was below the
friability, disintegration time, and dissolution rate,
standard in contrast to the legal paracetamol. There
which are affected by drug properties,
are some of post-marketing quality control studies
manufacturing methods and utilized excipients.
of paracetamol tablets that have been conducted in
Paracetamol tablet products of different
Libya. Khreit and others [17] tested ten brands of
manufacturers and/or sources are expected to
paracetamol that conformed to the USP/BP
measure varying quality parameters, however,
specifications. All the brands had shown their
within permitted limits to be considered successful
weight variation, hardness and friability measures
products. The quality of pharmaceutical dosage
satisfied with the range specified by USP/BP
forms has become a global concern, recently, as
limitations, in despite some apparent minor
counterfeit drugs are increasingly detected, and this
differences among them. The paracetamol content
concern has led to the necessity to evaluate the drug
test, which was carried out using HPLC showed
dosage forms available in the market. This
seven brands complied with the specification of BP
evaluation process is known as post-marketing
within the range of 90-110% stated content. While
quality control studies [11]. To date, a number of
three brands failed the content of active ingredient
post-marketing in vitro quality control studies have
test and did not comply with specifications. Rwaiha
been conducted to evaluate the physiochemical
et al. [18] carried out post-marketing in-vitro
properties of solid dosage forms [12, 13]. Islam et
studies for five brands of paracetamol marketed in
al. [14] analyzed four brands of paracetamol tablets
Libya. Excluding one brand which was failed the
by different physicochemical quality control
friability test by 20.0% deviations more than the
parameters. All the brand samples passed the
desired limit (1.0%), the study exhibited almost all
weight variation, hardiness, friability, and
of the selected brands of paracetamol assessed met
disintegration rate tests and they satisfy the
the BP specifications for quality control analysis.
specification limits. However, one brand sample
This study aimed to evaluate the legally registered
fail the dissolution test, as well as, another brand
paracetamol tablets in the Libyan market. These
sample fails the uniformity drug content test. The
brands were selected based on the differences in
results show that most of the brand samples satisfy
their manufacturing sources, their fast distribution
the specifications for all quality control parameters
and acceptability by the consumers, as well as, their
with low standard deviations. Alsaifi and Alyahawi
significant price difference.
[15] evaluated the quality of four brands of
Almdaaf et al. (2023) Mediterr J Pharm Pharm Sci. 3(4): 73-79. 73-79
Mediterranean Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences
www.medjpps.com ISSN: 2789-1895 online ISSN: 2958-3101 print
Materials and methods for the tablet to disintegrate. The beaker of the
disintegration tester was filled with 900 ml of
This study focused on evaluating various quality
deionized water at 37.0 ± 2.0 0C. Afterward, 6
control parameters for three brands of paracetamol
tablets were placed into the basket rack assembly
that are the most available products in the
and connected to the disintegration device. Finally,
government and private pharmacies. These quality
the disintegration time was recorded for the tablets.
control parameters includes weight uniformity,
hardness, friability, disintegration time and active Uniformity of content test: This test is based on the
ingredient content. Paracetamol 500 mg tablets of assay of the individual contents of the active
legally registered brands namely A, B, and C, were ingredients of several single-dose units. This assay
selected and coded, respectively. Paracetamol was performed in compliance with BP to assess the
reference standard powder was obtained from percentage content of paracetamol using the HPLC
Sigma Aldrich. Electronic analytical balance method. A standard stock solution of paracetamol
(ADAM AFP 110 L, India), tablet friability tester (250 mg/L) was prepared using the mobile phase.
(ERWEKA GmbH, Germany), TBH 125 tablet A series of working standard solutions in a range of
hardness tester (ERWEKA GmbH, Germany), (10-100 mg/L) were prepared by dilution from the
disintegration tester ZT 220 Series, (ERWEKA stock solution. Three sample solutions for the
GmbH, Germany) and HPLC 1260 Infinity Binary selected brands of paracetamol were prepared as
LC instrument (Agilent Technologies, Germany) well. The HPLC experimental measurement
were used to measure general and specific tests for procedure was conducted under the specific
quality of paracetamol tablets in compliance with conditions given in Table 1. A 10 μl aliquot of each
British pharmacopeia (BP) specifications. solution was injected into the column in three
replicates and the chromatograms were recorded.
Weight variation test: For each brand, 20 tablets
Thereafter, a calibration curve was constructed by
were selected at random, de-dusted and weighed
plotting the mean peak area versus the
individually using the electronic analytical balance.
concentration of paracetamol. The unknown
The average weight and deviations from that mean
concentration for the three paracetamol brands was
weight were calculated.
calculated from the regression equation derived
Friability test: This test was carried out by from the calibration graph.
selecting 20 tablets randomly from each brand, de-
Table 1: The HPLC experimental conditions
dusted and weighed using the electronic analytical
balance. Then, these tablets were placed in the Parameter Specific condition
drum of the friability tester and then operated at 25 Column Zorbax C18 (4.6 x 150 mm), 5 μm
rpm for four minutes (100 times rotation). Finally, Wavelength 243 nm
the tablets were de-dusted and re-weighed. The Mobile phase Methanol: water (40:60)
difference in the two weights was used to calculate Injection volume 20 μL
the friability value that was expressed in Flow rate 1 mL/min
percentage. Temperature Ambient
Almdaaf et al. (2023) Mediterr J Pharm Pharm Sci. 3(4): 73-79. 73-79
Mediterranean Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences
www.medjpps.com ISSN: 2789-1895 online ISSN: 2958-3101 print
investigated were within their shelf lives and treatment within the disintegration apparatus, and
immediate release dosage forms with a label it showed a disintegration time value of 19.5 min
strength of 500 mg. The results of the weight (Table 3).
variation test for all the brands revealed values that In Figure 1, The HPLC method for quantitative
complied with BP specifications as none of the analysis of paracetamol content in all brands has
brands deviated by up to ± 5.0% from the mean been used. The HPLC assay for paracetamol
value as shown in Table 2. On the other hand, content analysis showed a well-defined
Table 3 describes the results of hardness and chromatographic separation within a run time of six
friability tests. All the brands passed the non- min. It exhibited a retention time of paracetamol at
official hardness test according to BP, as none of 2.62 min ± 0.04 % (RSD), as well as, a standard
the obtained values exceeds 400 N. The friability paracetamol linear calibration curve with a
test revealed values that complied with BP linearity relationship in the range of 10-100 mg/L,
friability specifications as the percent friability for
a regression equation is Y = 84.943X and a
all assessed paracetamol tablets was less than 1.0%. correlation coefficient (r) of 0. 999. The outcomes
This indicated that all the tablets of each brand of the uniformity of drug content tests showed all
were mechanically stable. Furthermore, the results the assessed paracetamol brands complied with the
of this study showed that all the brands have passed BP standard specifications for the uniformity
the disintegration time test according to BP, except content test as displayed in Table 4.
brand B which has left core mass after 15 min of
Brand Average weight Permissible weight variation Real measured weight Percentage of
code in mg, n=20 range (mg) based on BP (±5%) variation range (mg) deviation range
Table 4: Disintegration time and uniformity of drug content tests of different paracetamol brands
Almdaaf et al. (2023) Mediterr J Pharm Pharm Sci. 3(4): 73-79. 73-79
Mediterranean Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences
www.medjpps.com ISSN: 2789-1895 online ISSN: 2958-3101 print
Almdaaf et al. (2023) Mediterr J Pharm Pharm Sci. 3(4): 73-79. 73-79
Mediterranean Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences
www.medjpps.com ISSN: 2789-1895 online ISSN: 2958-3101 print
Conclusion: Despite one brand that failed the obtained from the present study were similar to the
disintegration time test and exceeded the allowed outcomes observed from the previous quality
BP limit test by about 5 minutes, the overall quality assessment studies of paracetamol tablets. Thus,
evaluation results of the three brands of this supports that paracetamol brands in Libya
paracetamol assessed in the Libyan market were to showed reliable quality standards.
verify with BP quality requirements. The results
Author contribution: All authors contributed equally and approved the final version of the manuscript and agreed to be
accountable for its contents.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a
potential conflict of interest.
Ethical issues: Including plagiarism, informed consent, data fabrication or falsification, and double publication or submission
have completely been observed by authors.
Data availability statement: The raw data that support the findings of this article are available from the corresponding author
upon reasonable request.
References
1. Binega G, Wondimisgegne D, Tsega B (2013) Analysis and comparison of paracetamol tablets dispensed in
legal dispensaries and non-pharmaceutical shops in Gondar town, North West Ethiopia. International Journal
of Pharmacy and Industrial Research. 03 (02): 144-151. doi: Nil.
2. Nsimba SED (2008) Problems associated with substandard and counterfeit drugs in developing countries: a
review article on global implications of counterfeit drugs in the era of anti-retroviral (ARVS) drugs in a free
market economy. East African Journal of Public Health. 5 (3): 205-210. doi: 10.4314/eajph.v5i3.39004
3. Counterfeit drugs: guidelines for the development of measures to combat counterfeit drugs (1999) Geneva;
World Health Organization (WHO): 1-60. doi: Nil.
4. Taylor RB, Shakoor O, Behrens RH, Everard M, Low AS, Wangboonskul J, Reid RG, Kolawole JA (2001)
Pharmaopoeial quality of drugs supplied by Nigerian pharmacies. Lancet. 357 (9272): 1933-1936. doi: 10.1016/
s0140-6736(00)05065-0
5. Technical report on counterfeit medicines: Counterfeit medicines Fact Sheet No 275.Geneva; World Health
Organization (WHO): 2006. doi: Nil.
6. Kaur H, Goodman C, Thompson E, Thompson KA, Masanja I, Kachur SP, Abdulla S (2008) A nationwide
survey of the quality of antimalarial in retail outlets in Tazania. PlOS One. 3 (10): 3403. doi.org/10.1371/
journal.pone.0003403
7. Mehuys E, Crombez G, Paemeleire K, Adriaens ELs, Van Hees T, Demarche S, Christiaens T, Van Bortel L,
Van Tongelen I, Remon J-P, Boussery K (2019) Self-medication with over-the-counter analgesics: a survey of
patient characteristics and concerns about pain medication. The Journal of Pain. 20 (2): 215-223. doi: 10.1016/
j.jpain.2018.09.003
8. Chung VC, Ma PH, Tang TS, Lau CH, Kim JH, Griffiths SM (2011) Do patients tell their clinicians they are
using both prescribed and over the counter allopathic and traditional medicines? European Journal Integrative
Medicine. 3 (4): 289-298. doi: 10.1016/j.eujim.2011.09.008
9. Teklu L, Adugna E, Ashenef A (2014) Quality evaluation of paracetamol tablets obtained from the common
shops (KIOSKS) in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 5
(8): 3502-3510. doi: /10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.5(9).3502-10
10. Jozwiak-Bebenista M, Nowak JZ (2014) Paracetamol: mechanism of action, applications and safety concern.
Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica-Drug Research. 71 (1): 11-23. PMID: 24779190.
11. Khan AD, Baranwal PK, Ali MA, Kumar S, Sharma S (2019) Comparative quality evaluation of two brands of
paracetamol tablets obtained from the market. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research.
1 (1): 14-18. doi: 10.37021/IJPER.V111.14
12. Abozaid DA, Saleh WM (2022) Evaluation of some metformin hydrochloride brands available in the Libyan
market. Mediterranean Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2 (4): 6-12. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.
7479690
13. Akasha AA, Ahdeya EA, Bsebsu ZA (2019) Comparative study between five brands of metformin
hydrochloride available in Libyan drug market. Mintage Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Sciences. 8 (3)
37-41. doi: Nil.
Almdaaf et al. (2023) Mediterr J Pharm Pharm Sci. 3(4): 73-79. 73-79
Mediterranean Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences
www.medjpps.com ISSN: 2789-1895 online ISSN: 2958-3101 print
14. Islam M, Gupta V, Mahalwal VS, Achalu T (2019) Physico-chemical evaluation of four brands of paracetamol
500 mg tablets by using quality control techniques. The Pharmaceutical and Chemical Journal. 6 (4): 89-96.
doi: Nil.
15. Alsaifi1 A, Alyahawi A (2018) Quality assessment of different brands of paracetamol tablets in Yemeni market.
Universal Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 3 (4): 42-46. doi: 10.22270/ujpr.v3i4.182
16. Sahle SB, Ayane AT, Wabe NT (2012) Comparative quality evaluation of paracetamol tablet marketed in
Somali region of Ethiopia. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 3 (2): 545-550. doi:
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.3(2).545-50
17. Khreit OIG, Alkailani HAM, Alqathafi WSK (2017) A comparative study of physical and chemical parameters
of selected paracetamol tablets available in the pharma market of Libya. Der Pharma Chemica. 9 (2): 1-6. doi:
Nil.
18. Rwaiha O, Sarar O, Jwaili M, Alshowaigi M, Mtawa A, Alsabri S (2020) Post-marketing in-vitro comparative
studies of different brands of paracetamol tablets available in Misurata market, Libya. Research and Reviews:
Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 9 (1): 1-10. Corpus ID: 235806211.
Almdaaf et al. (2023) Mediterr J Pharm Pharm Sci. 3(4): 73-79. 73-79