2 - Surface Runoff Modeling
2 - Surface Runoff Modeling
Dr. S.Sarvanan
Assistant Professor
Department of Civil Engineering
National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli - 15.
• Unit Hydrograph
Properties, Assumptions and limitations
1
4/8/2023
HYDROLOGY | watershed |
Topography
characteristic factors Topography determines the speed with which the runoff will reach a river.
Clearly rain that falls in steep mountainous areas will reach the river
faster than flat or gently sloping areas.
Shape
Shape will contribute to the speed with which the runoff reaches a river. A
long thin catchment will take longer to drain than a circular catchment.
Size
Size will help determine the amount of water reaching the river, as the
larger the catchment the greater the potential for flooding.
Soil type
Soil type will help determine how much water reaches the river.
Sandy soils are very free draining and rainfall on sandy soil is likely to
be absorbed by the ground.
Clayey soils can be almost impermeable and therefore rainfall on clay
soils will runoff and contribute to flood volumes.
Land use
Land use can contribute to the volume of water reaching the river, in a
similar way to clay soils. For example, rainfall on
roofs, pavements and roads will be collected by rivers with almost no
4/8/2023
absorption into the groundwater.
2
4/8/2023
3. As water infiltrates, some water will flow just below the surface.
This is called interflow, or subsurface flow.
FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS OF
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
3
4/8/2023
Infiltration Excess
Saturation Excess
4
4/8/2023
• Rain is retained in the soil until the soil saturation capacity is achieved.
The submersion time (ts), can be defined as the duration between the
beginning of rainfall and the instant when the soil achieves saturation
capacity.
• The submersion time also indicates the flow beginning. For soils the
submersion time is variable and depends on rainfall intensity and initial
soil humidity.
Smaller intensity of
! rainfall also produce
significant stream flow.
10
5
4/8/2023
0.06
0.04
Qef
0.02
0
A graph drawn between time 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
to discharge amount Time (hrs)
6
4/8/2023
13
14
7
4/8/2023
•
Qp
Qp
Tp Tp 15
The hydrologic response depends also on the initial soil moisture state of
the catchment. In relating effective rainfall to surface runoff, the amount
of effective rainfall depends on the state of the catchment before the
storm event.
If the ground is saturated or the
catchment is impervious, then a high
proportion of the rain becomes
effective runoff. By absorbing rainfall
an unsaturated ground• has a certain
capacity before responding to
effective rainfall that contributes to
the surface runoff. Once the ground
deficiencies have been made up the
rainfall becomes fully effective. 16
8
4/8/2023
UNIT HYDROGRAPH
Unit hydrograph is the hydrograph of surface runoff resulting from a rain
that falls in a unit of time (1 hour or 1 day) and produced uniformly in
space and time over the total catchment area (Sherman, 1942).
9
4/8/2023
ASSUMPTIONS FOR A UH
19
10
4/8/2023
21
DETERMINE DURATION
11
4/8/2023
DETERMINE DURATION
DETERMINE DURATION
12
4/8/2023
Duration
Lag Time
Time of Concentration
Rising Limb
Recession Limb (falling
limb)
Peak Flow
Time to Peak (rise time)
Recession Curve
Separation
Base flow
25
13
4/8/2023
Rising Limb
▪ The rising limb of a hydrograph (concentration curve) represents the increase in discharge
due to the gradual building up of storage in channels and over the catchment surface.
▪ As the storm continues more and more flow from distant parts reach the basin outlet. At
the same time the infiltration losses also decrease with time.
Crest
▪ The peak flow occurs when the runoff from various parts of the catchment at the same
time contribute the maximum amount of flow at the basin outlet.
▪ Generally for large catchments, the peak flow occurs after the end of rainfall,
▪ the time interval from the centre of mass of rainfall to the peak being essentially
controlled by basin and storm characteristics.
Recession Limb
▪ It extends from the point of inflection at the end of the crest segment to the start of the
natural groundwater flow
▪ It represents the withdrawal of water from the storage built up in the basin during the
earlier phases of the hydrograph.
▪ The starting point of the recession limb (the point of inflection)
represents the condition of maximum storage.
▪ Since the depletion of storage takes place after the end of rainfall, the shape of this
part of the hydrograph is independent of storm characteristics and depends entirely on
the basin characteristics.
▪ The storage of water in the basin exists as
surface storage, which includes both surface detention and channel storage,
interflow storage, and groundwater storage, i.e. base-flow storage.
14
4/8/2023
15
4/8/2023
SYNTHETIC UHS
𝑡𝑝 = 𝐶1 𝐶𝑡 𝐿 ∙ 𝐿𝑐 0.3 ℎ𝑟
Lmain = 4.45 km 𝑡𝑟 = 𝑡𝑝 /5.5 = 0.7 ℎ𝑟
𝑡𝑝𝑅 = 𝑡𝑝 + 0.25 𝑡𝑅 − 𝑡𝑟
𝐶2 𝐶𝑝 𝐴
Lc = 2.0km 𝑄𝑝𝑅 =
𝑡𝑝𝑅
Area = 5.42 km2
0.12 IUH
0.1
0.08
IUH (m3/S)
0.06
0.04
Qef 0.02
0
A graph drawn between time 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
to discharge amount Time (hrs)
16
4/8/2023
• Widths
𝐶75 440
(4.05,570) • 𝑊75 = 1.08 = = 2.88 ℎ𝑟
𝑄𝑝𝑅 /𝐴 570/5.42 1.08
𝐶50 770
• 𝑊50 = = = 5.04 ℎ𝑟
(3.09,427.5) (5.97,427.5) 𝑄𝑝𝑅 /𝐴
1.08
570/5.42 1.08
𝐴 5.42
W 75 • 𝑇𝑏 = 2581 𝑄 − 1.5 𝑊50 − 𝑊75 = 2581 570 − 1.5 ∗
𝑝𝑅
(2.37,285)
(7.41,285) 5.04 − 2.88 = 14.1 ℎ𝑟
W 50
1/3 2/3
(14.1,0)
17
4/8/2023
484 A
Qup =
tp
Drain
tp = + tL
2
tL = 0.6tc
Qp is peak ‘unit’ runoff, in m3/s per inch of total runoff; A in Km2, tp in hr; for units of m3/s
per cm, km2, and hr, coefficient is 2.08
To develop unit hydrograph for desired duration, multiply values on x and y axes of standard,
dimensionless SCS hydrograph by tp and Qup, respectively. (Applicable for D tc/6.)
Example.An urban watershed has a projected area of 0.63 Km2 and a time of
concentration of 1.25 hr. Develop the 10-min unit hydrograph for the watershed,
using the SCS universal unit hydrograph.
Dr 0.167 hr
Estimate time to peak flow: tp = + tL = + 0.75 hr = 0.84 hr
2 2
Qup =
(
ft 3 /s 484 A mi
2
=
)
484 ( 0.63)
= 363
Estimate peak unit flow: t p hr
in 0.84
18
4/8/2023
A finite UH indicated as D → 0.
The limiting case of UH of zero
duration is known as instantaneous unit
hydrograph (IUH).
1 − TAi = 1.414 (1 − Ti )1.5 for (0.5 Ti 1.0) 6 53 17,093 8955 5,333 7,150
8 79 25,478 14043 8,955 11,500
10 0 0 9717 14,043 11,880
IUH i = cI i + (1 − c) IUH ( i −1) 12 6724 9,717 8,220
14 4653 6,724 5,690
2 t
c= 16 3220 4,653 3,940
2 R + t 18 2228 3,220 2,720
20 1542 2,228 1,890
✓ Dt = the time step used n the calculation 22 1067 1,542 1,300
of the translation unit hydrograph 24 738 1,067 900
26 510 738 630
✓ The final unit hydrograph may be found 28 352 510 430
by averaging 2 instantaneous unit 30 242 352 300
32 168 242 200
hydrographs that are a Dt time step 34 116 168 140
apart. 36 81 116 100
38 55 81 70
40 39 55 50
42 26 39 30
44 19 26 20
46 13 19 20
48 13
19
4/8/2023
0 - 0 - - - - - 0 0
1 10 5 0 - - - - 5 13.9
2 30 15 10 0 - - - 25 69.4
3 20 10 30 20 0 - - 60 166.7
4 40 20 20 60 15 0 - 115 319.4
5 - 0 40 40 45 10 0 135 375
6 - - 0 80 30 30 5 145 402.8
7 - - - 0 60 20 15 95 263.9
8 - - - - 0 40 10 50 138.9
9 - - - - - 0 20 20 55.6
10 - - - - - - 0 0 0
Sum 100 - - - - - - 650 -
20
4/8/2023
S- HYDROGRAPH METHOD.
The theoretical S-hydrograph is that resulting from a continuous excess rainfall at a
constant rate of 1 cm/h (or 1 in/h) for an indefinite period. This is the unit step response
function of a watershed system. The curve assumes a deformed S shape and its ordinates
ultimately approach the rate of excess rainfall at a time of equilibrium. This step response
function g(t) can be derived from the unit pulse response function h(t) of the unit
hydrograph, as follows.From Eq. (7.2.4), the response at time t to a unit pulse of duration
Δt beginning at time 0 is
Similarly, the response a time t to a unit pulse beginning at time Δt is equal to h(t - Δt ),
that is, h(t) lagged by Δt time units:
Continuing this process indefinitely, summing the resulting equations, and rearranging,
yields the unit step response function, or S-hydrograph, as shown in Fig. 7.8.1(a):
21
4/8/2023
S CURVES
300 150
200
100
100
0 50
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
0
0 2 4 6 8
22
4/8/2023
1 2 3 4 5
0.5-h unit Lagged S- 1.5-h unit
Time S-hydrograph
hydrograph hydrograph hydrograph
g(t - Δ
t (h) h(t)(Cumec) g(t)(Cumec) h'(t) (Cumec)
t')(Cumec)
0.5 404 202 0 135
1 1079 742 0 495
1.5 2343 1913 0 1275
2 2506 3166 202 1976
2.5 1460 3896 742 2103
3 453 4123 1913 1473
3.5 381 4313 3166 765
4 274 4450 3896 369
4.5 173 4537 4123 276
5 0 4537 4313 149
5.5 0 4537 4450 58
6 0 4537 4537 0
1 2 3 4 5
▪ This inflow is routed through the first reservoir to get the outflow
hydrograph. The out flow from the first reservoir is considered as the
input to the second; the outflow from the second reservoir is the input
to the third and so on for all the n reservoirs.
▪ The outflow hydrograph from the nth reservoir is taken as the IUH of
the catchment.
23
4/8/2023
which can be solved with q(0) = q0 = 0, q(0) = q0 = 0, ... q(t ) = u (t − ) I ()d CONVOLUTI
ON
as 0
INTEGRAL
h(t-τ) is the basin response function, which describes the runoff
concentration 4
7
S.Saravanan
IMPULSE RESPONSE
FUNCTION u(t)
defines the response
of a linear system to
an instantaneous unit
input applied
t
at time τ
Q(t) = I (τ)u(t − τ)dτ
τ=0
convolution integral
24
4/8/2023
CONVOLUTION
𝝉 ∆𝑡
continuous 𝒅𝝉 𝑚∆𝑡
discrete (t−𝜏)
-- pulse response function (𝑛 − 𝑚 + 1)∆𝑡
𝑄𝑛 = 𝑝𝑚 𝑈𝑛−𝑚+1
𝑚=1
𝑡
Q(t) = 0 I(𝜏)U(t−𝜏)d𝜏
Q(t)
Q(t)
(t) 𝑛∆𝑡
S.Saravanan
S.Saravanan
25
4/8/2023
Example
n≤M
Qn = ∑ Pm Un−m+1
m=1
11
S.Saravanan
• ⤷ influence (“weight”) on q(t) due to the input I(t), which occurred (t-τ) before
tp tL t u()
tUH 0
12
S.Saravanan
26
4/8/2023
UH IDENTIFICATION
Two options
• de-convolution given observed q(t) and p(t) solve for h(t) the convolution integral
⤷ q(t ) = tu (t − ) I ()d à u(t) = …
0
13
S.Saravanan
UH IDENTIFICATION
u(t, p)
U(t,p)
NON LINEAR SYSTEM I(t) q(t) RP of I(t) ≠ RP of q(t)
Basin Char
non-linearities decrease with increasing areas of basins and with increasing amount of precipitation
two approaches:
geomorphoclimatic UH: quasi linear, i.e. linear scheme different from storm to storm
14
S.Saravanan
27
4/8/2023
Hypothesis: p(t)
• synchronous transfer throughout the network à W = W[h(q)] ⇒ W(q)
h(t ) =k 1 e −k
15
S.Saravanan
t t
p(t) p(t)
p* p*
t t p*
ϑ
q(t) q(t)
Qmax Qmax
p* p*
p*
t t
ϑ
(
Qmax = p * 1 − −ϑ k
) à
q(t ) = p * 1 − e− t k
( )
e
rising limb q(t ) = p * e
à ( −t k −etk
falling limb −ϑ
Qmax = p* is reached for t à ∞ )−
16
S.Saravanan
28
4/8/2023
qn-1
the second linear à = =
∫0 e k⋅ k dτ =
e
reservoir, one obtains k
t −t
= 2 e
k k
qn
n2
n1<n2
Q n1 Q tp1<tp2
t t
tp1
tp2
n=2
n=3
The characteristics of the
n=4 Nash model depend on the
n=5 value of the parameters, n
n=7 n=10
Q (or α) and k
29
4/8/2023
M 1Q − M 1I
n=
K
Q
M 2Q − M 2 I
K= − ( M1Q − M 1I )
t M1Q − M 1I
( n −1) −t
1 t
Q (t ) = . .e K
K .n K
t 3t 5t
2 2 2
NQ.t
30
4/8/2023
Determine n Determine k
Compare with
Determine 1 hr DSRO by
Observed
GIUH and Nash IUH
Hydrograph
20
S.Saravanan
31
4/8/2023
HORTO STRAHER
N
SHREVE SCHEIDEGGE
R 21
S.Saravanan
22
S.Saravanan
32
4/8/2023
23
S.Saravanan
24
S.Saravanan
33
4/8/2023
25
S.Saravanan
1 1 1
1
BASIN RESPONSE 1
2
is regulated by the 1 2 2
2
1
1
topological structure of the 1
1
3
2 1
river network 2
2
2
1
3 3
1
4
26
S.Saravanan
34
4/8/2023
sS
where Ts is the travel time in a path s:
Ts = Ta + Tr + Tr + ...+ Tr
+1
27
S.Saravanan
P(s) = P,+1P+1,+2...P−1, 1 2 2
2
1
1
1 2 1
- θω is the probability that a drop will start its travel in a 1 3
2
hillslope segment draining into a stream of order ω 2
1 2
3
- Pi,j are the tansition probabilities from streams of order i to j 3
1
4
Function of network topology only !!!
GIUH = pdf of TB
dP(TB t)
hB (t) = = fT (t)* fT (t)* fT (t)*...* fT (t)P(s)
dt sS
a r r+1 r
28
S.Saravanan
35
4/8/2023
36
4/8/2023
LΩ is the length in kilometers of the highest order and V is the expected peak
velocity in m/s.
37
4/8/2023
U Nu logNu
1 55 -
2 22 -
3 9 -
. . .
. . .
. . .
n 1 - OR
N1
Rb(1,2) = − b = log N u +1 − log N u
N (u + 1) − u
R b(2,3) = N2 b = log
Nu
= log R
N3 N u+1
Theiraverage€ R b = log b
Rb of basin
1 Nu
Bifurcation Ratio =
1
2
R=
b
1 N u +1
3
1 Nu and Nu+1 are the number of streams
1 2 of orders u and u+1, resp.
3
4
1
2 3 Where: RB is the bifurcation ratio, and
Ni and Ni+1 are the numbers of streams in
1 order i and i+1 respectively, i = 1, 2 … Ω
2
2 where Ω is the highest stream order of the
4 order
th
order 5 watershed. The value of bifurcation ratio; RB
basin for watersheds varies between 3 and 5.
38
4/8/2023
RA is the stream area ratio, The value of RA for watersheds varies between
3 and 6.
39
4/8/2023
79
- v is in m/s
1.31 0.43
hp = RL v - L is in km
hp
L
- hp is in 1/hr
0.55
0.44L RB
tp = RL −0.38
v RA
tp tb
29
S.Saravanan
40
4/8/2023
GEOMORPHOLOGICAL INSTANTANEOUS
UNIT HYDROGRAPH (GIUH) - 4
- v is in m/s
0.78
RB - L is in km
n = 3.29 RL 0.07
RA - k is in 1/hr
0.48 - n is dimensionless
L R 1000
k = 0.7 A
v R BR L 3600 30
S.Saravanan
41
4/8/2023
𝑣 3.58
0.78
R 3 3
N = 3.29 A RL
RB
2.49
2.30
2 2
1.79
1 1.10 1
A
RA =
A −1 0 0.00 0
1 2 3 4 5
RL = L − L −1 Watershed Order
N
RB =
N −1
QGIS extracted Horton’s parameters for Temur Catchments
0.1
0.08
IUH (m3/S)
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Time (hrs)
42
4/8/2023
S.Saravanan
where P is the excess rainfall depth, β0 and β1 are linear regression coefficient related
to basin characteristics
36
S.Saravanan
43
4/8/2023
GEOMORPHOCLIMATIC INSTANTANEOUS
UNIT HYDROGRAPH (GCIUH) - 1
The Transfer function depends on the average precipitation during on
the event
Kinematic transfer throughout the network “Regular” geometry
Qp
ത 𝐿 𝑎𝛺3Τ2
𝑃𝐴𝑅 ത 𝐿 𝑎𝛺3Τ2
𝑃𝐴𝑅
𝑄𝑝 = 0.161 𝑄𝑝 = 0.161 Τ
𝐿5𝛺 2
Τ 𝐿5𝛺 2
tp
Τ
𝐿5𝛺 2
𝑡𝑝 = 3.169
ത 𝐿 𝑎3Τ2
𝑃𝐴𝑅 𝛺
𝐿𝛺 , 𝑏𝛺 m 𝑎𝛺 m-1/3s-1
Strickler’s Average Average
𝑝ҧ m/s Qp ms-1 Coefficient Slope of width of
tp s (Roughness) the Max. the Ω)
𝐴𝛺 m2
order(Ω) channel
𝑘𝑆𝛺 m1/3s-1 channel 39
S.Saravanan
RA = 5
Travel time distribution
RB =4
1
t= l RL = 2
v
v = 1 (m / s)
Hillslope versus channel flow
L = 3 (km)
v = vchannel
v = vhillslope = vchannel
1
33
S.Saravanan
44
4/8/2023
( Ln )
0.6 From table, for urban residential areas (>6
tc = 0.94 houses/ac), n = 0.08;
i 0.4 S 0.3 L and S are given, but i must be determined.
14.24
tc (min) = 0.4
i (in/hr)
T&E approach:
• Assume a value for i or tc
• If tc was guessed, assume storm duration D = tc
• Determine D or i from IDF curve (whichever was not assumed)
• Compute tc from Henderson & Wooding
• Repeat until D = tc
From Table of runoff coefficients, C for dense residential area with rolling terrain is
0.75 (for Q in cfs, i in in/hr and A in ac). Using tc = D = 12 min, i = 1.60 in/hr:
45
4/8/2023
( Ln )
0.6 From table, for urban residential areas (>6
tc = 0.94 houses/ac), n = 0.08;
i 0.4 S 0.3 L and S are given, but i must be determined.
14.24
tc (min) = 0.4
i (in/hr)
T&E approach:
• Assume a value for i or tc
• If tc was guessed, assume storm duration D = tc
• Determine D or i from IDF curve (whichever was not assumed)
• Compute tc from Henderson & Wooding
• Repeat until D = tc
• The ordinates of the various DHRs are divided by the respective ER values to
obtain the ordinates of the unit hydrograph.
46
4/8/2023
Time (hr) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Discharge(m3/s) 0 6 13 22 16 11 7 4 2 1 0
Solution:
The calculations for the flood hydrograph are as per the table below. It may be
noted that the precipitation of 4 cm/hr for 2 hr is split into 2 parts each of 4 cm/hr
for 1 1 hr and their hydrographs worked separately. The hydrographs due to 1
cm/hr precipitation is taken after a gap of 2 hr since there is a gap of 1 hr after
the 4 cm/hr precipitation.
47
4/8/2023
300
Flood Hydrograph
250
Discharge (Cumec)
200
150
100
50
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Time (h)
48
4/8/2023
Compute a 4-h unit hydrograph ordinate and plot: (i) the S-curve (ii) the 4-h UG
Time(h) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
2-h UH
0 25 100 160 190 170 110 70 30 20 6 0 0 0
Ordinates(m3/s)
49
4/8/2023
11) The runoff data at a stream gauging station for a flood are given below. The drainage
area is 40 km2. The duration of rainfall is 3 h. Derive the 3-h unit hydrograph for the basin.
50
4/8/2023
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1-3-2017 2 50 50 - - -
5 47 47 0 0 0
8 75 46 29 1.09 3
11 120 45 75 2.82 6
14 225 45 180 6.77 9
17 20 45 245 9.23 12
20 270 46 224 8.44 15
23 145 48 97 3.65 18
2-3-1970 2 110 50 60 2.26 21
5 90 53 37 1.39 24
8 80 54 26 0.98 27
11 70 57 13 0.49 30
14 60 60 0 0 33
17 55 55 - - -
20 51 51 - - -
23 50 50 - - -
51
4/8/2023
EXAMPLE
Time ( hr) 1 2 3 4 5 6
Unit hydrograph ( cfs) 10 100 200 150 100 50
PROBLEM
52
4/8/2023
PROBLEM
Cum. Instantaneous
Time Rain Runoff
4:00 0 0
4:30 30 0.3
5:00 80 4.2
5:30 90 11.3
6:00 95 13
6:30 127 34
7:00 130 45.3
7:30 132 21.2
8:00 9.3
8:30 4.8
9:00 2.5
9:30 1.4
10:00 0.8
10:30 0
PROBLEM 8.2.4.
10
31.74
5
0
3:36 4:48 6:00 7:12 8:24 9:36 10:48
53
4/8/2023
Phi . DT 26.75 60
Excess
Incremental Rainfall 50
Rainfall (mm) (mm)
0 40
30 3.246674 3.246674
50 23.246674 23.24667
10 -16.753326 30 0
5 -21.753326 0
32 5.246674 5.246674
20
3 -23.753326 0
2 -24.753326 0
10
Sum positive 31.74
0
3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30
54
4/8/2023
55