MT Lab Manual Final - 2019
MT Lab Manual Final - 2019
Material testing is very important to show the various properties of metals and the defects which
may found in it during production or during its service. Classifications of metal testing are
Destructive tests, Non- destructive tests, Technological tests, Chemical tests, Electrochemical test
and Metallography tests.
In the following the different classes of material tests will be discussed briefly.
1. Destructive tests
Destructive material tests are the kind of tests where the test specimen destroys after the test and
could not be used. The test specimens for destructive tests can be a sample taken out from a piece
of a semi-product (sheet, rod, section) and a sample of the final products (bolts, shafts), or any
simple structure. Destructive tests are tensile test, compression test, bending test, impact test, creep
test, stress relaxation test and fatigue test.
2. Non-destructive materials test
They are tests that carry out on specimens of material products or on specimens of machine parts
or structure during the service without changing their functions to find out their defects. The
following tests are classified as non-destructive tests namely Radio graphic test, Magnetic test,
Electrical test, Ultra-sonic test and some hardness test.
3. Technological tests
It is usually rapid methods, which give an idea whether metal is suitable for a special purpose or
not, e.g. testing a metal to know its liability to forging, rolling, bending or deep drawing.
Technological test such as:
a) Spark test - Some metal can be estimated by spark test wherever some metal gives spark
(Fe) and the others (Mo) not. The spark density, color & shape can also define the type of
metal under the testing.
b) Worm compression test - The shape and distribution of the cracks on carrying out a warm
compression gives an indication about the type and properties of the metal.
c) Bending test - Bending of sheets for several times, it gives an indication for the ability of
deep drawing of metal under testing.
d) Folding test - by folding the sheet to show its ability of forming.
e) Hammering test - from the sound of hammer or the deformation resulting from the
hammering, some indications could be obtained about the metal.
Technological tests do not give a quantitative result, but give an idea about the different properties
of the metals or its stability for the working purposes.
4. Chemical tests
Chemical analysis is carried out on the metals and alloys for the following purposes i) To identify
the quantity and types of the inclusions (sulphides, oxides) and ii) To show the percentage of the
alloying elements.
5. Electrochemical test
The well-known electrochemical test is the corrosion test, to show the activity of the metals and
alloys in different environments; i.e. in different chemical medium and under different current
density. Other electrochemical experimental tests are the metal wining test (such as copper
refining) and metal plating.
6. Metallographic test
It is the study of microstructure of the specimen on the prepared cross section under an optical
microscope (up to a magnification of 2000X) or studying the macrostructure under low
magnification stereomicroscope (up to 20X). The purposes of metallographic are:-
a) Structure of phases; i.e. shape and distribution of graphite in grey cast iron, cementite in white
cast iron and distribution and area fraction of reinforcing component in composite materials.
b) Density and length of micro-cracks.
c) Grain size of the micro and macrostructure.
d) Type and morphology of the inclusions.
e) The form and distortion of the grain gives an indication about the type of deformation (rolling,
bending).
f) Identification of the type of stress leading to the failure of the damaged materials (creep failure,
fatigue, stress corrosion cracking).
2. METALLOGRAPHIC EXAMINATION
AIM: To conduct a Metallographic test to study the microstructure of different specimens
using metallurgical microscope and identify the materials.
The microstructures of metals and alloys are determined by composition, solidification processes,
and thermo mechanical treatment. Microstructure of a material dictates their response to service
environments. Because of the relationships between structure and properties, metallographic
characterization is used in materials specification, quality control, quality assurance, process
control, and failure analysis.
Typical structure-property relationships that have been established using optical metallography
include:
A general increase in yield strength and hardness of a metal with decreasing grain size.
A general tendency for a decreased ductility with increasing inclusion content.
Correlations of weld penetration, heat-affected zone (HAZ) size, and weld-defect density with
the nature and character of the welding.
Evaluation of such surface treatments as carburizing and induction hardening by determinations
of the depth and micro structural characteristics of the hardened region.
Correlations of fatigue crack growth rates and fracture-toughness parameters with such structural
variables as inclusion content and distribution.
Association of failure initiation sites with micro structural in homogeneities such as second-
phase particles.
Correlations of anisotropic mechanical behavior with elongated grains and/or preferred grain
orientations.
Specimen Preparation:
1. Selection of specimen: Selection must be homogeneous in composition & characteristic of the
material, it should be of size convenient to handle (say 10mm dia X 10 mm). It is cut from the
metal / alloy with hacksaw or water-cooled slitting wheel.
2. Coarse grinding: It is necessary to obtain a flat specimen. This is done by using a specially
designed motor driven emery belt. The specimen should be kept cool by frequently dipping it
during grinding operation.
3. Polishing: Polishing is carried on water proof emery papers of progressively finer grades (220,
320, 400& 600) that are attached on a plane glass plate. The specimen is drawn back & forth along
with entire length of paper so that scratches produced are roughly at right angles, to those produced
by the preliminary grinding operation. Having removed the primary grinding scratch marks, the
specimen is washed thoroughly. Polishing is continued on 320, 400 & 600 papers by turning the
specimen 90 0 until the previous scratch marks are removed. Thoroughly wash the specimen in
water.
4. Fine scratches are removed by polished using a rotary polishing machine. The specimen is
polished by rubbing on a soft, moist velvet cloth mounted on a flat rotating disc with polishing
paste (alumina). During polishing, constant feed of water to the rotating pad is a must. After
polishing (by obtaining a scratch free/ mirror finish) the specimen is washed thoroughly in water.
5. Etching: Grain boundaries can be easily revealed revealed by using etching reagents which
selectively corrode the polished surface. Etching reagents used are 3% Nital (3cc Nitric acid and
97cc Ethanol) for ferrous materials and 50 cc Ammonium hydroxide, 20-50cc, hydrogen peroxide,
50cc water for brass and bronze. Etching time is 30 sec.
The specimen is immersed/ swabbed with above etchants for a short duration (10-30 sec) until the
polished surface becomes slightly dull/ discolored. It is thoroughly washed with water, alcohol and
dried. Now the specimen is ready for microstructure determination.
INSTRUCTIONS:
Prepare the Metallurgical specimen as explained.
Place the specimen below the objective lens of the microscope (on the specimen table).
Illuminate the lamp by rotating the knob.
Move the specimen table up or down by operating the knob of the table and to adjust the
light to be focused of sample material surface till clear image of specimen structure is
observed.
Draw the sketch of the structure and identify the constituents and their distribution using
the image analysis software, photographs and compare.
Identify the material on the basis of microstructure.
Tabulate the material name, material number and the structure.
OBSERVATIONS:
RESULT:
DISCUSSION:
CONCLUSION:
3. HARDNESS TEST
INTRODUCTION
Hardness is defined as the resistance of a material to permanent deformation such as indentation,
wear, abrasion, scratch. Principally, the importance of hardness testing has to do with the
relationship between hardness and other properties of material. Hardness and tensile tests measure
the resistance of materials to plastic flow, and results of these tests closely parallel each other.
Hardness test is preferred because it is simple, easy, and relatively nondestructive.
Hardness test is a mechanical test for material properties which are used in engineering design,
analysis of structures, and materials development. The principal purpose of the hardness test is to
determine the suitability of a material for a given application, or to find the particular treatment to
which the material has been subjected. The ease with which the hardness test can be conducted
has made it the most common method of inspection of materials.
Measuring Hardness
Hardness tests are conducted in a variety of ways, as indicated by the names of the tests as follows:
Static indentation tests: A ball, cone, or pyramid is forced into the surface of the metal
being tested. The relationship of load to the area or depth of indentation is the measure of
hardness, such as in Brinell, Knoop, Rockwell, and Vickers hardness tests.
Rebound tests: An object of standard mass and dimensions is bounced from the surface of
the work piece being tested, and the height of rebound is the measure of hardness.
Scleroscope and Leeb tests are examples.
Scratch file tests: The idea is that one material is capable of scratching another. Moh’s and
file hardness tests are examples of this type. Moh’s hardness ranges from 1 to 10.
Plowing tests: A blunt element (usually diamond) is moved across the surface of the
sample specimen under controlled conditions of load and shape. The width of the groove
is the measure of hardness. The Bierbaum test is an example.
Damping tests: Hardness is determined by the change in amplitude of a pendulum having
a hard pivot, which rests on the surface of the workpiece being tested. The Herbert
Pendulum test is an example.
Cutting tests: A sharp tool of given shape is caused to remove a chip of standard
dimensions from the surface of the workpiece being tested.
Abrasion tests: A workpiece is loaded against a rotating disk, and the rate of wear is the
measure of hardness.
Erosion tests: Sand or other granular abrasive is impinged on the surface of the workpiece
being tested under standard conditions, and loss of material in a given time is the measure
of hardness. Hardness of grinding wheels is measured by this testing method.
Electromagnetic testing: Hardness is measured as a variable against standards of known
flux density.
Ultrasonic testing: A type of indentation test
Use of a Brinell hardness number table can simplify the determination of the Brinell hardness. A
well-structured Brinell hardness number reveals the test conditions, and looks like this, "75 HB
10/500/30" which means that a Brinell Hardness of 75 was obtained using a 10mm diameter
hardened steel with a 500 kgf load applied for a period of 30 seconds. For tests on extremely hard
metals a tungsten carbide ball is substituted for the steel ball. Compared to the other hardness test
methods, the Brinell ball makes the deepest and widest indentation, so the test averages the
hardness over a wider amount of material, which will more accurately account for multiple grain
structures and any irregularities in the uniformity of the material. This method is the best for
achieving the bulk or macro-hardness of a material, particularly those materials with
heterogeneous structures.
Fig: 3.5; Diamond pyramid indenter used for the Vickers test and resulting indentation in the workpiece. d,
mean diagonal of the indentation in millimeters.
Fig: 3.6; Vicker’s indentations with equal diagonals but different areas, center one is right
When the mean diagonal of the indentation has been determined the Vickers hardness may be
calculated from the formula, but is more convenient to use conversion tables. The Vickers hardness
should be reported like 800 HV/10, which means a Vickers hardness of 800, was obtained using a
10 kgf force. Several different loading settings give practically identical hardness numbers on
uniform material, which is much better than the arbitrary changing of scale with the other hardness
testing methods. The advantages of the Vickers hardness test are that extremely accurate readings
can be taken, and just one type of indenter is used for all types of metals and surface treatments.
Although thoroughly adaptable and very precise for testing the softest and hardest of materials,
under varying loads, the Vickers machine is a floor standing unit that is more expensive than the
Brinell or Rockwell machines.
Disadvantages of the Vickers test are:
Test is slow and not well adapted for routine testing. Typical test and measurement times are in
the one-minute range. Careful surface preparation of the specimen is necessary, especially for
shallow indentations. Measurement of diagonals is operator dependent, with possible eyestrain and
fatigue adding to test errors.
Results
Samples will be selected to be tested by Brinell, Vickers and Rockwell hardness test, the results
are given to students in the class lab.
a) For Brinell experiment, student has to calculate the BHN and depth of impression (h)
through the following formulas for each material tested:
- (3.1)
- (3.2)
c) For Vickers experiment, student has to calculate the VHN through the following formula for
each material tested:
- (3.3)
In the class, the values of P and d ( 1 and 2) had been given to students.
The Scleroscope test consists of dropping a diamond tipped hammer, which falls inside a glass
tube under the force of its own weight from a fixed height, onto the test specimen. The height of
the rebound travel of the hammer is measured on a graduated scale. The scale of the rebound is
arbitrarily chosen and consists on Shore units, divided into 100 parts, which represent the average
rebound from pure hardened high-carbon steel. The scale is continued higher than 100 to include
metals having greater hardness. The Shore Scleroscope measures hardness in terms of the elasticity
of the material and the hardness number depends on the height to which the hammer rebounds, the
harder the material, the higher the rebound.
INSTRUCTIONS:
Select the load and type of the indenter for the given metal from the standard table.
Put the required load on the hanger in the back of the tester. Fix the indenter in the proper
place.
Place the specimen on the anvil. Rotate the disc until the indenter touches the metal
surface. Further rotate the disc to apply the minor load till the pointer in the small dial
coincides with red mark.
By operating the lever apply the load and wait till the lever becomes horizontal.
Lower the anvil by rotating in the reverse direction and remove the metal.
Determine the diameter of the indentation by microscope micrometer.
Using the equation (3.1), material, load applied P, diameter of indenter calculates the
BHN and compare with that obtained from chart.
OBSERVATION:
Diameter of the Indenter, D = mm
Indentation diameter, d = mm
TABULAR COLUMN:
Diameter of
Indentor indentation
B H N from B H N from
Sl. No. Material Load in Kg Diameter(D)
calculation Chart
in mm
d1 d2 d
RESULT:
DISCUSSION:
CONCLUSION:
INSTRUCTIONS:
Prepare the specimen surface. There should be no rust, scale and uneven surface.
Select the load and type of the indenter for the given metal from the standard table.
Put the load on the hanger in the back side of the tester and fix the indenter in the proper
place.
Place the specimen properly on the anvil. Rotate the disc until the indenter just touches the
metal surface, further rotate the disc to apply the minor load until the pointer in the small
dial coincides with red mark.
By operating the lever apply the load and wait till the lever becomes horizontal.
Lower the anvil by rotating in the reverse direction and remove the specimen.
Determine the RHN by directly reading from the dial gauge.
Repeat the tests for T1, T2, T3 what are these.
OBSERVATION:
TABULAR COLUMN:
RESULT:
DISCUSSION:
CONCLUSION:
TABULAR COLUMN:
Length of diagonal
Average of VH N VH N
Sl. Load in
Material diagonal from from
No kg
d 1 in mm d2 in mm d=(d1+d2)/2 calculation Chart
RESULT:
DISCUSSION:
CONCLUSION:
4. HEAT TREATMENT
AIM: To conduct a Heat treatment of steels by Annealing, Normalizing, Quenching
(Hardening) and Tempering & to determine the changes in the Hardness of the metal.
APPARATUS: Heat treatment furnace, tongs, salt or oil bath and Hardness testers.
THEORY:
Principles of Heat Treating of Steels
Steel is an alloy of iron and carbon with the carbon content between a few hundredth of a percent
up to about 2 wt%. Other alloying elements can amount in total to about 5 wt% in low-alloy steels
and higher in more highly alloyed steels such as tool steels and stainless steels. Steels can exhibit
a wide variety of properties depending on composition as well as the phases and micro constituents
present, which in turn depend on the heat treatment. Various types of heat treatment are described
below.
Annealing- Place the given specimen inside the furnace and switch on the furnace. Set the
temperature to the specified value by operating the temperature selecting knob.
% of carbon in steel Annealing temperature
0.1 to 0.5 950 oC to 810 oC
0.5 to 0.9 810 oC to 760 oC
0.9 to 1.3 760 oC to 780 oC
Hold the specimen at that temperature for 15 min (2.5 to 3 min per 1mm thickness), cool the
specimen in furnace or in good heat insulating material and after temperature reaches room
temperature measure the hardness.
Normalizing- Place the given specimen inside the furnace and switch on the furnace. Set the
temperature to the specified value by operating the temperature selecting knob between 8300C to
950 0C, hold the specimen at that temperature for 15 min (2.5 to 3 min per 1mm thickness). Cool
the specimen in the still air by placing it outside the furnace. After temperature reaches room
temperature measure the hardness.
Hardening (Quenching) - Place the given specimen inside the furnace and switch on the furnace.
Set the temperature to the specified value by operating the temperature selecting knob between
800 oC to 900 oC, hold the specimen at that temperature for 15 min (2.5 to 3 min per 1mm thickness).
Cool the specimen by dipping it in oil or water. After temperature reaches room temperature,
measure the hardness.
Tempering - Place the given specimen inside the furnace and switch on the furnace. Set the
temperature to the specified value by operating the temperature selecting knob between 150oC to
450 oC, hold the specimen at that temperature for 15 min (2.5 to 3 min per 1mm thickness). Cool
the specimen in the still air or any desired state by controlling the cooling temperature. After
temperature reaches room temperature measure the hardness.
[Reference from the book “Metallurgy for Engineers” by E. C. Rollason, 4 th Edition, Edward Arnold
Ltd.,1975 ]
INSTRUCTIONS:
Preparation of specimen to measure hardness.
Measure the hardness of the given specimen before the heat treatment
Carry out the heat treatment as explained for each type
Remove the scale formed on the surface of the heat-treated specimen and fond the hardness
of the specimen.
OBSERVATION:
TABULAR COLUMN:
Vickers
Temperature for Rockwell hardness no Percentage
Material hardness no
Heat treatment difference
Before After Before After
RESULT:
DISCUSSION:
CONCLUSION:
The velocity at which these waves propagate is related to the Young’s Modulus for the material
and is characteristic of that material. For example, the velocity in steel is 5900 meters per second,
and in water 1400 meters per second.
The standard method of presenting information in ultrasonic testing is by means of a cathode ray
tube, in which horizontal movement of the spot from left to right represents time elapsed. The
principle is not greatly different in digitized instruments that have an LCD flat screen. The rate at
which the spot moves is such that it gives the appearance of a horizontal line on the screen. The
system is synchronized electronically so that at the instant the probe receives its electrical pulse
the spot begins to traverse the screen. An upward deflection (peak) of the line on the left-hand side
of the screen is an indication of this occurrence. This peak is usually termed the initial pulse.
Whilst the base line is perfectly level the crystal is quiescent. Any peaks to the right of the initial
pulse indicate that the crystal has received an incoming pulse reflected from one or more interfaces
in the material. Since the spot moves at a very even speed across the tube face, and the pulse of
ultrasonic waves moves at a very even velocity through the material, it is possible to calibrate the
horizontal line on the screen in terms of absolute measurement. The use of a calibration block,
which produces a reflection from the back wall a known distance away from the crystal together
with variable controls on the flaw detector, allows the screen to be calibrated in units of distance,
and therefore determination of origins of returned pulses obtained from a test piece.
detects those defects which are not normally visible to the unaided eye, but also renders easily
visible those defects which would otherwise require close scrutiny of the surface.
In the direct method high amperage current is passed through the subject and magnetic flux is
generated at right angles to the current flow. Therefore, the current flow should be in the same line
as the suspected defect.
If it is not possible to carry out this method because of the orientation of the defect, then the indirect
method must be used. This can be one of two forms:
1. Passing a high current through a coil that encircles the subject.
2. Making the test piece form part of a yoke, which is wound with a current carrying coil? The
effect is to pass magnetic flux along the part to reveal transverse and circumferential defects.
(a) (b)
Fig: 5.2; Schematic arrangement for detecting a) Longitudinal defects b) transverse and
circumferential defects
This method is frequently used for the detection of surface breaking flaws in non-ferromagnetic
materials. The subject to be examined is first of all chemically cleaned, usually by vapor phase, to
remove all traces of foreign material, grease, dirt, etc. from the surface generally, and also from
within the cracks.
Next the penetrant (which is a very fine thin oil usually dyed bright red or ultra-violet fluorescent)
is applied and allowed to remain in contact with the surface for approximately fifteen minutes.
Capillary action draws the penetrant into the crack during this period.
The surplus penetrant on the surface is then removed completely and thin coating of powdered
chalk is applied. After a further period (development time) the chalk draws the dye out of the crack,
rather like blotting paper, to form a visual, magnified in width, indication in good contrast to the
background.
The process is purely a mechanical/chemical one and the various substances used may be applied
in a large variety of ways, from aerosol spray cans at the simplest end to dipping in large tanks on
an automatic basis at the other end. The latter system requires sophisticated tanks, spraying and
drying equipment but the principle remains the same.
INSTRUCTIONS:
OBSERVATION:
Surface Flaws
Distance from the By Measurement
Sl. No By U S F Detector
reference
Internal Flaws
RESULT:
DISCUSSION:
CONCLUSION:
INSTRUCTIONS:
OBSERVATION:
Visual inspection of the material
RESULT:
Observed defects on the surface =
Location of the defect on the sub surface =
DISCUSSION:
CONCLUSION:
INSTRUCTIONS:
Clean the surface of the component to remove dust and oil.
Using wire brush remove scale and other dirt.
Spray the cleaner liquid on the surface and wash it with cloth
Apply the penetrator on the surface.
Remove the excess penetrator on the surface by cloth
Apply the developer and wait for few seconds
Identify the red mark on the surface where the penetrator starts coming out of the crack.
Record the defects present on the surface.
OBSERVATION:
Visual inspection of the material
Defects
Model No. Remarks
identified
RESULT:
Observed defects on the surface =
DISCUSSION:
CONCLUSION:
6. TENSILE TEST
AIM: To conduct a tensile test on the mild steel specimen and to determine Young’s modulus
and yield stress as well as σ – ε characteristics of the material.
THEORY:
The Tension Test is one of the most commonly used tests for evaluating materials. In its simplest
form, the tension test is accomplished by gripping opposite ends of a test item within the load
frame of a test machine. A tensile force is applied by the machine, resulting in the gradual
elongation and eventual fracture of the test item. During this process, force-extension data, a
quantitative measure of how the test item deforms under the applied tensile force are monitored
and recorded. When properly conducted, the tension test provides data to quantify several
important mechanical properties of a material.
These mechanical properties determined from tension tests include, but are not limited to, the
following:
Elastic deformation properties, such as the modulus of elasticity (Young's modulus) and
Poisson's ratio
Yield strength and tensile strength
Ductility properties, such as elongation and reduction in area
Strain-hardening characteristics
Note: While the yield strength of steels varies from 100MPa - 2000MPa with composition
and heat treatment, the modulus of elasticity varies only slightly 195GPa - 210 GPa.
(a) (b)
Fig: 6.2; a) Attachment for Tension Test for shouldered and threaded specimens b) Tension Test
Fig: 6.4; Engineering stress-strain curve. Intersection of the dashed line with the curve determines the offset
yield strength.
INSTRUCTIONS:
Measure the diameter of the specimen at different locations along the gauge length;
calculate the average diameter, mark and measure the gauge length of the specimen by
marking the reference end points using Vernier caliper.
Using the controls of the machine firmly fix the specimen into the grips between upper and
middle cross head.
Fix the extensometer in the gauge length region and connect it to the control unit.
In the software open the main menu
Select create - new from file menu
Specify the file name
OBSERVATION:
Initial gauge length, Li = mm
Initial Diameter, Di = mm
Final Diameter, Df = mm
Load at fracture, Pf = kN
Specimen Calculations:
Young’s modulus – Stress / Strain (taken in linear region) = Slope of the line=
Tabular column-
Least Count of the Vernier Caliper =
RESULT:
Ultimate stress, σu =
Fracture stress, σf =
Young’s modulus =
DISCUSSION:
CONCLUSION:
7. COMPRESSION TEST
AIM: To conduct a compression test on the given specimen and to determine Young’s
modulus and fracture stress (ultimate stress).
THEORY:
The compression test consists of deforming a cylindrical specimen to produce a shorter
cylinder of larger diameter (upsetting). The compression test is a convenient method for
determining the stress-strain response of materials at large strains (ε > 0.5) because the test is not
subject to the instability of necking that occurs in a tension test. It is more convenient because the
compression test specimen is relatively easy to make, and it does not require a large amount of
material. The compression test is frequently used to evaluate the workability of materials,
especially at elevated temperature, because most deformation processes, like forging, have a high
component of compressive stress. The test is also used with brittle materials, for which it is
extremely difficult to machine a specimen and tensile test it in perfect alignment.
There are two inherent difficulties with the compression test that must be overcome by the
test technique: buckling of the specimen and barreling of the specimen. Both conditions cause non
uniform stress and strain distributions in the specimen that make it difficult to analyze the results.
Buckling is a mode of failure characterized by an unstable lateral material deflection caused by
compression. Buckling is controlled by selecting specimen geometry with a low length-to-
diameter ratio. L/D less than 2 and a compression specimen with L/D = 1 is often used. It also is
important to have a very well aligned load train and to ensure that the end faces of the specimen
are parallel and perpendicular to the load axis. Barreling is the generation of a convex surface on
the exterior of a cylinder that is deformed in compression. This is due to the prevention of the
lateral movement of the specimen parts adjacent to the compression plates and can be reduced by
lubricating the faces to reduce friction that causes constraint on the movement.
Fig: 7.3; a) Photography of a specimen showing flow of grains and b) A schematic of the same.
INSTRUCTIONS:
Measure the diameter of the specimen at different locations calculates the average
diameter along the length and find the length of the specimen using Vernier caliper.
Locate the specimen centrally between lower and middle cross head firmly.
In the software open the main menu
Select create - new from file menu
OBSERVATION:
Initial Diameter, Di = mm
Final Diameter, Df = mm
Load at fracture, Pf = kN
Dept. of Mechanical Engg. Vemana IT Bangalore 52
MATERIALS TESTING LAB BME303
Specimen Calculations:
TABULAR COLUMN:
Least Count of the Vernier Caliper =
Final diameter
RESULT:
Yield stress, σy =
Ultimate stress, σu =
Fracture stress, σf =
Young’s modulus =
DISCUSSION:
CONCLUSION:
8. BENDING TEST
AIM: To conduct a Bending test on the given specimen and to determine Young’s modulus
and maximum bending stress.
THEORY:
Bend Tests are conducted to determine the ductility or strength of a material. The tests
typically used are discussed in this article with details on test methods, apparatus, procedures,
specimen preparation, and interpretation and reporting of results. The section “Bending Ductility
Tests” also includes representative test data for many metals.
Bend or flexure testing is common in springs and brittle materials whose failure behaviors
are linear such as concretes, stones, woods, plastics, glasses and ceramics. Other types of brittle
materials such as powder metallurgy processed metals and materials are normally tested under a
transverse flexure. Bend test is therefore suitable for evaluating strength of brittle materials where
interpretation of tensile test result of the same material is difficult due to breaking of specimens
around specimen gripping. The evaluation of the tensile result is therefore not valid since the failed
areas are not included in the specimen gauge length. Smooth rectangular specimens without
notches are generally used for bend testing under three-point or four-point bend arrangements as
shown in figs 8.1 a) and b) respectively.
Fig: 8.1; Bend testing of a rectangular bar under a) three-point bend and b) four-point bend arrangements
Considering a three-point bend test of an elastic material, when the load P is applied at the midspan
of specimen in an x-y plane, stress distribution across the specimen width (w = 2c) is demonstrated
in figure 8.1 a). The stress is essentially zero at the neutral axis N-N. Stresses in the y axis in the
positive direction represent tensile stresses whereas stresses in the negative direction represent
compressive stresses. Within the elastic range, brittle materials show a linear relationship of load
and deflection where yielding occurs on a thin layer of the specimen surface at the midspan. This
in turn leads to crack initiation which finally proceeds to specimen failure. Ductile materials
however provide load-deflection curves which deviate from a linear relationship before failure
takes place as opposed to those of brittle materials previously mentioned. Furthermore, it is also
difficult to determine the beginning of yielding in this case. The stress distribution of a ductile
material after yielding is given in figure 8.2 b). Therefore, it can be seen that bend testing is not
suitable for ductile materials due to difficulties in determining the yield point of the materials under
bending and the obtained stress-strain curve in the elastic region may not be linear. The results
obtained might not be validated. As a result, the bend test is therefore more appropriate for testing
of brittle materials whose stress-strain curves show its linear elastic behavior just before the
materials fail
Figure: 8.2; Stress distributions in a rectangular bar when a) elastically bended and b) after yielding
INSTRUCTIONS:
Measure the breadth and depth of the specimen at different locations along its length.
Calculate the averages and find the length of the specimen using Vernier caliper.
Place the specimen on the two-roller support properly.
Measure the distance between the rollers supports place the specimen between lower and
middle cross head.
In the software open the main menu
Select create - new from file menu
Specify the file name
Select the test type – Tension (bending)
Substitute the b and d of the rod and gauge length
Enter the controlling parameter
The graph will appear and specify the X-axis and Y –axis limits
Select tare load.
After starting the UTM in the software select start
Dept. of Mechanical Engg. Vemana IT Bangalore 60
MATERIALS TESTING LAB BME303
Note down the corresponding load and displacement values at regular intervals.
Note down yield point and fracture point with corresponding load values.
Tabulate load v/s deflection and draw the graph and take slope in the linear region
Using the formula calculate young’s modulus and bending stress.
OBSERVATION:
Specimen Calculations:
Moment of inertia, I = (b x d 3) / 12
= mm4
Young’s modulus E = [∂W/∂y) Lo3] / 48 I, where ∂W/∂y is slope of liner portion of the curve.
TABULAR COLUMN:
RESULT:
DISCUSSION:
CONCLUSION:
9. TORSION TEST
AIM: To conduct a torsion test on the given specimen and to determine modulus of rigidity
and ultimate shear stress.
THEORY:
Torsion tests can be carried out on most materials, using standard specimens, to determine
mechanical properties such as modulus of rigidity, yield shear strength, ultimate shear strength,
modulus of rupture in shear, and ductility. Torsion tests can also be carried out on full-size parts
(shafts, axles, and twist drills) and structures (beams and frames) to determine their response to
torsional loading. In torsion testing, unlike tension testing and compression testing, large strains
can be applied before plastic instability occurs, and complications due to friction between the test
specimen and dies do not arise. Torsion tests are most frequently carried out on prismatic bars of
circular cross section by applying a torsional moment about the longitudinal axis.
The shear stress versus shear strain curve can be determined from simultaneous
measurements of the torque and angle of twist of the test specimen over a predetermined gage
length.
In torsional testing of prismatic bars of circular cross section, it is assumed that:
Bar material is homogeneous and isotropic.
Sections that are originally plane to the torsional axis remain plane after deformation.
The maximum shear stress can be calculated from knowledge of the torsional loading and bar
geometry. When the surface shear stress (Tzθ) max of a solid bar during torsional loading reaches
the yield shear stress (k) of the test material, plastic deformation (flow) occurs. The deformation
zone begins at the surface of the bar and advances inward as an annulus surrounding an elastic
core. The stress distributions are shown schematically in Fig9.1 for a non-work-hardening and a
work-hardening material.
INSTRUCTIONS:
Measure the diameter of the specimen at different places along the length and calculate
the average length.
Measure the gauge length of the specimen.
Mark a line along the length of the specimen.
Fix the specimen in the grips.
Set the dial reading to zero and adjust the range of values in the dial by placing the proper
weight in the hanger behind the machine.
Start rotating the crank and note down the values of the Torque and angle of twist for
regular interval.
Continue this till the fracture and note down the maximum torque.
Draw the graph of torque v/s angle of twist. and find the slope in the linear region
Calculate the modulus of rigidity and maximum shear stress by formula.
OBSERVATION:
Specimen Calculations:
= mm4
Modulus of rigidity, G = (L / J) x (T / θ)
Tabular column:
RESULT:
Modulus of rigidity G = N/mm2
Maximum Shear stress = N/mm2
DISCUSSION:
CONCLUSION:
THEORY:
Shear Loading
The torsion test described above subject’s material to shear stress in a twisting mode, but
shear stresses also occur in a translational mode. In all of these examples, the average shear stress
acting on the shear planes is:
τ = F/As where F is the load transmitted and As is the total area of the shear planes. For design
against failure, this shear stress must be less than the shear strength of the material.
INSTRUCTIONS:
Measure diameter of the specimen using venire caliper.
Fix the specimen in the shear attachment for either single shear or double shear
By operating up and down movement button place the shear attachment in between lower
and middle cross head.
In the software open the main menu
Select create - new from file menu
Specify the file name
Select the test type – Tension (bending)
Substitute the diameter of the rod
Enter the controlling parameter
The graph will appear and specify the X-axis and Y –axis limits
Select tare load.
After starting the UTM in the software select start
note down the maximum load at fracture
Using the formula calculate maximum shear stress.
OBSERVATION:
Specimen Calculations:
Tabular column:
Ultimate shear
Type of shear test Diameter Area Load at fracture
stress
RESULT:
Maximum Shear stress (single shear) = N/mm2
DISCUSSION:
CONCLUSION:
Fig: 11.2; Dimensional details of Charpy test specimens most commonly used for evaluation of notch
toughness. (a) V-notch specimen (ASTM E 23 and ISO 148). (b) Keyhole specimen (ASTM E 23). (c) Unotch
specimen (ASTM E 23 and ISO 83)
Izod impact testing uses a specimen with a V-notch (Fig.11.3) that is similar to the Charpy V-
notch specimen. The principal difference is that the specimen is gripped at one end only, allowing
the cantilevered end to be struck by the pendulum (Fig.11.3). An advantage of this method is that
several notches can be made in a single specimen and the ends broken off one at a time. The
disadvantage that has caused it to lose popularity is that the required time for and method of
clamping the specimen in an anvil precludes low-temperature testing. Izod specimens can also be
round. Many testing machines can be used for both Charpy and Izod testing.
(a) (b)
INSTRUCTIONS:
Determine the dimension of the specimen along with the notch
Without fixing the specimen check the arrangement of the pendulum and dial pointer
Fix the pendulum holder at an angle of 141.48 for Charpy test and adjust the pointer on the
scale to read 168 J.
Without the specimen fixed in the table release the pendulum and observe the pointer note
down any deviation as error.
Fix the specimen as shown in fig and adjust the pointer to read 168 J.
Release the pendulum and note down the reading counting the divisions from zero reading
of the scale.
Calculate impact strength by formula.
OBSERVATION:
Angle of fall, α =
Angle of Rise, β =
FORMULAE:
Area, A = b (d - d 1)
= mm2
Tabular column:
Impact Strength, J
RESULT:
Charpy Impact strength per unit area = J / mm2
DISCUSSION:
CONCLUSION:
INSTRUCTIONS:
Determine the dimension of the specimen along with the notch
Without fixing the specimen check the arrangement of the pendulum and dial pointer
Fix the pendulum holder at an angle of 90o for Charpy test and adjust the pointer on the
scale to read 168 J.
Without the specimen fixed in the table release the pendulum and observe the pointer note
down any deviation as error.
Fix the specimen as shown in fig and adjust the pointer to read 168 J.
Release the pendulum and note down the reading counting the divisions from zero reading
of the scale.
Calculate impact strength by formula
OBSERVATION:
Length of the specimen, l = mm
Angle of fall, α =
Angle of Rise, β =
FORMULAE :
Area, A = b (d-d1)
= mm2
= J / mm2
Tabular column:
Impact Strength, J
RESULT:
Izod Impact strength per unit area = J / mm2
DISCUSSION:
CONCLUSION:
APPARATUS: Pin on disc testing machine, Vernier caliper, weighting balance, stop watch.
THEORY:
Wear is the progressive loss of substance from the operating surface. The usual classification of
types of wear is abrasive wear; most examples in practice are a combination of two or more of
these.
“Abrasive wear”– abrasion is virtually a cutting action which may result from loose, hard particles
sliding between two mating surfaces. It can also arise when one pair of rubbing surfaces is itself
rough. The loose particles may be dirt from the environment or wear debris.
Adhesive wear:
If a tangential force is applied between two sliding blocks, shearing can take place either at the
original interface or along a path below or above it, causing adhesive wear. Adhesive wear arises
when junctions weld together, becomes broken by relative motion and wear particle result. In the
case of a steel shaft rotating in a broken bearing, it is not uncommon to find traces of broken film
on the shaft thus indicating adhesive wear.
Fretting wear:
When a small relative slipping motion takes between two surfaces the result is an amount of fine
wear debris and this wear is designated as fretting wear.
Fatigue wear:
Wear due to dynamic loading is called fatigue wear. Balls and rollers are subject to very high
alternating stresses and when these are above the endurance limit, small cracks will result followed
by pitting and spalling.
Erosive wear: Wear due to impact of particles is called erosive wear. A popular example is sand
blasting.
There are several testing materials for measure of wear. The simplest is pin on disc machine in
which a loaded pin is pressed on to rotating disc. The amount of wear after a given amount of
rubbing is measured either by loss of weight of specimen or dimensional changes.
Rolling contact Wear from the accumulation of surface damage during the cyclic stressing
Wear of one body rolling over or along another v Surface damage other than
wear (examples) Loss or displacement of material from a surface owing
to mechanical contact in some form.
Chipping Removal of material from a surface, generally involving brittle crack
propagation and the production of shell-like features. Chipping commonly
occurs at sharp corners or edges of brittle contact surfaces.
Scratching Production of one or more shallow grooves in a surface by a hard-counter
body moving tangentially along the surface
Fig: 12.1; Schematic diagram of pin-on-abrasive disk wear apparatus. I, current; V, potential; Ng, normal
acceleration (up and down motion of pin specimen as a result of interaction with abrasive disk); f, frictional
force of pin-abrasive disk couple; Vs, sliding speed of disk.
Fig:12.3; Wear curve for ASTM A 514, type B low-alloy steel showing nonlinear and linear portions of
volume loss versus sliding distance data. Normal force, 1.4 N (0.3 lbf); sliding speed, 0.1 m/s.
Fig: 12.4; Wear curves of volume loss versus time for different materials worn against high silica quartzite.
INSTRUCTIONS:
OBSERVATION:
Rotational speed, N
Time , t in min
FORMULAE :
Mass of the material removed, δW = W1 –W2 =
Sliding distance, S = (2 π r n) t =
Wear volume = (π d 2 / 4) x δL =
Wear coefficient,
Weight basis = δW / (S x W) =
Volume basis = δV / (S x W) =
TABULAR COLUMN:
RESULT:
Wear coefficient
Weight basis Kw =
Volume basis Kv =
Coefficient of Friction =
DISCUSSION:
CONCLUSION:
THEORY:
Fatigue is the progressive, localized, and permanent structural damage that occurs when a material
is subjected to cyclic or fluctuating strains at nominal stresses that have maximum values less than
(and often much less than) the static yield strength of the material. This process of fatigue failure
can be divided into different stages, which, from the standpoint of metallurgical processes, can be
divided into five stages:
1. Cyclic plastic deformation prior to fatigue crack initiation
2. Initiation of one or more microcracks
3. Propagation or coalescence of microcracks to form one or more microcracks
4. Propagation of one or more macrocracks
5. Final failure
Fig: 13.1; Schematics of rotating-beam fatigue testing machines. (a) Four-point loading R.R. Moore testing
machine. (b) Cantilever loading rotating-beam machine.
Fig: 13.2; Nomenclature for a typical fatigue specimen. Ends of round specimens may have smooth shanks,
button heads, or threads. Smooth shanks should be long enough to accommodate some type of wedge grip.
Rectangular specimens are generally made with smooth shanks, but may be shouldered to contain a hole for a
pin bearing.
Fig: 13.4; Typical fatigue stress cycles a) Reversed stress b) Repeated stress c) Random stress cycle
INSTRUCTIONS:
Method- 1
In this method large no of specimen in the standard form are taken and different loads are
applied producing different bending stress on the specimens and the no of revolutions at which it
fails is recorded. The S-N diagram is drawn by taking stress on Y-axis and no of revolutions on
X- axis. This diagram tells about behavior of the material under the application of repeated load.
Method -2
In this method generally the bending stress to be applied decided, depending upon design
requirements. If the design requirement is such that it should withstand bending stress of 400MPa
then the load applied is calculated by Pb = ( σ b x d 3 ) / 50.93. This load is applied and no of
revolutions at which the specimen fails is recorded and checked against the expected values.
OBSERVATION:
FORMULAE:
Tabular column:
Load Stress
Sl. No No. of cycles for failure Remarks
applied level
RESULT:
No. of cycles for failure =
DISCUSSION:
CONCLUSION:
Introduction
The behavior of materials is different when they are subjected to dynamic loading. The
testing of materials under dynamic conditions needs an efficient and reliable equipment to
experimentally examine and quantify the dynamic behavior of materials under low velocity impact
loads. The range of such impact loads vary from a few m/s to several hundred m/s (such as a bullet
impact). It is not possible with any one apparatus to cover a velocity range such as this. Various
devices such as explosive or air gun rigs are employed for high velocity impact tests. Drop weight
machines are in use to conduct test at low velocity impact loads.
The drop weight impact test machine was developed to perform low velocity impact tests
up to a maximum velocity of 10 m/s. The machine was designed to test specimens of varying
geometry which can accommodate a maximum cross-sectional area of 22500 (150x150) mm2. The
energy of the impactor can also be varied by changing the mass of the impactor.
Design Principle
A machine based on the impacts produced by dropped mass works on the principle of free fall
velocity under gravity which is given by
V = √2gh, (14.1)
Where,
g = Acceleration due to gravity (m/s2)
h = Drop height (m)
The maximum energy that can be stored in the drop mass ‘m’ is its potential energy which is
given by
Potential energy = m g h (14.2)
Where,
m = Drop mass (kg)
This energy has to absorbed by any specimen under test
1. Plunger
2. Impactor
3. Operating switch
4. Specimen
5. Load cell and DAQ
the later dissipates the kinetic energy of the mass. The deformation of the specimen and the force
that is transmitted to the base which supports the test specimens have to be measured.
OBSERVATION
TABULAR COLUMN
RESULTS:
DISCUSSION:
CONCLUSIONS: