Private International Law Bibliography 2022: U.S.

and
Foreign Sources in English†

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajcl/article/71/2/500/7296010 by Tsinghua University user on 13 January 2024

Compiled by Symeon C. Symeonides*

I. Books

Bariatti, S., Viarengo, I. &. Villata, F.C. Cuniberti, G., The UNCITRAL Model
(eds.), EU Cross-Border Succession Law on International Commercial Ar-
Law (2022). bitration: A Commentary (2022).
Basedow, J. et al. (eds.), Intellectual Prop- D’Alessandro, E. & Gascón Inchausti, F.
erty in the Conflict of Laws (2022). (eds.), The European Account Preserva-
Basedow, J. & Nadjma, Y. (eds.), Iranian tion Order: A Commentary on Regula-
Family and Succession Laws and Their tion (EU) No 655/2014 (2022).
Application in German Courts (2022). Efrat, A., Intolerant Justice: Conflict and
Beaumont, P. & Holliday, J. (eds.), Guide Cooperation on Transnational Litiga-
to Global Private International Law tion (2022).
(2022). Einhorn, T., Private International Law in
Bédard, J. & Pearsall P.W. (eds.), Reflec- Israel (3d ed. 2022).
tions on International Arbitration— Ferrari, F. & Rosenberg F. (eds.), Hand-
Essays in Honour of Professor George book of Evidence in International Arbi-
Bermann (2022). tration (2022).
Beltrán, J.F. & Vázquez, C. (eds), Evidential Fitchen, J. & Beaumont, P. (eds.), The Pri-
Legal Reasoning: Crossing Civil Law and vate International Law of Authentic In-
Common Law Traditions (2022). struments (2022).
Bogdan, M. & Maunsbach, U., Private Folsom, R.H., International Litigation
International Law in Sweden (2022). and Arbitration (3d ed. 2022).
Bork, R. & van Zwieten, K. (eds.), Com- Gailhofer, P. et al. (eds.), Corporate Li-
mentary on the European Insolvency ability for Transboundary Environ-
Regulation (2d ed. 2022). mental Harm: An International and
Born, G., International Civil Litigation in Transnational Perspective (2022).
the United States Courts (7th ed. 2022). Gallant, K.S., International Criminal
Chen, R.-C., Private International Law in Jurisdiction: Whose Law Must We
Taiwan (2021). Obey? (2022).
Critchley, A. & Beaumont, P. (eds.), Ap- Garb, L. & Norridge, R. (eds.), Inter-
plication of Foreign Law in the British national Succession (5th ed. 2022).
and German Courts (2022). Harris, J. & McLachlan, C. (eds.), Essays
Cuniberti, G., Conflict of Laws: A Com- in International Litigation for Lord
parative Approach (2d ed. 2022). Collins (2022).

* Member, Executive Editorial Board. This bibliography includes books, and

articles in journals (but not chapters in books), printed in 2022, or earlier, but not
included in the 2021 bibliography. The term private international law is used in its
broadest sense. It includes not only conflict of laws (adjudicatory jurisdiction, choice of
law, and recognition of sister-state and foreign judgments), but also prescriptive juris-
diction, extraterritoriality, federal-state conflicts, as well as certain aspects of arbitra-
tion, the law of foreign relations, and international human rights.
† https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avad026

© The Author(s) [2023]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American
Society of Comparative Law. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.
[email protected].
2023] P R I VAT E I N T E R N AT I O N A L L AW B I B L I O G R A P H Y 2 0 2 2 501

Honorati, C. & Baruffi, M.C., EU Private Requejo Isidro, M. (ed.), Brussels I Bis:
International Law in Family Matters A Commentary on Regulation (EU) No
(2022). 1215/2012 (2022).
Irving, H., Allegiance, Citizenship and the Ricketson, S. & Ginsburg, J., Inter-
Law (2022). national Copyright and Neighbouring
Jansen, R., Legal Privilege and Trans- Rights: The Berne Convention and Be-

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajcl/article/71/2/500/7296010 by Tsinghua University user on 13 January 2024

national Evidence-Taking (2022). yond (3d ed. 2022).
Jolly, S. et al. (eds.), Indian Private Inter- Roosevelt, K., Conflict of Laws (3d ed.
national Law (2021). 2022).
Kay, H.H., Kramer, L., Roosevelt, K. & Ruggeri, L., Limante, A. & Pogorelcnik
Franklin, D.L., Conflict of Laws, Cases, Vogrinc, N., The EU Regulations on
Comments, and Questions (11th ed. Matrimonial Property and Property of
2022). Registered Partnerships (2022).
Kostic-Mandic, M., Private International Rutherglen, G.A., Transnational Civil
Law in Montenegro (2022). Litigation: Principles and Prospects (2d
Laganière, G., Liability for Transboundary ed. 2022).
Pollution at the Intersection of Public Saranovic, F., Freezing Injunctions in Pri-
and Private International Law (2022). vate International Law (2022).
Lavan, M. & Ando, C. (eds.), Roman and Schaafsma, S.J., Intellectual Property in
Local Citizenship in the Long Second the Conflict of Laws (2022).
Century CE (2022). Sooksripaisarnkit, P. & Dharmita Prasad,
Lohmann, A.M., The Arbitrator’s Discre- D. (eds.), Blurry Boundaries of Public
tion in Conflict of Laws Matters (2022). and Private International Law: To-
Lookofsky, J., Understanding the CISG wards Convergence or Divergent Still?
(6th (worldwide) ed. 2022). (2022).
Maganaris, E., Core Statutes on Conflict Stamboulakis, D., Comparative Recogni-
of Laws (2022). tion and Enforcement: Foreign Judg-
McCormack, G., EU Insolvency Law: ments and Awards (2022).
Cross Border Insolvency Law in Com- Swenson, G., Contending Orders: Legal
parative Focus (2022). Pluralism and the Rule of Law (2022).
Merrett, L., Employment Contracts and Tovar Galvan, R., Legal Pluralism and
Private International Law (2d ed. Efficiency in Marriage Law (2022).
2022). Trimmings, K. et al., Domestic Vio-
Meyer, O., Public Policy and Private Inter- lence and Parental Child Abduction
national Law (2022). (2022).
Nafziger, J.A.R. & Gauthier, R. (eds.), Twerski, A. & Cohen, N., Choice of Law:
Handbook on International Sports Law Cases and Materials for a Concise
(2d ed. 2022). Course on Conflict of Laws (2d ed.
Nafziger, J.A.R., Telesetsky, A. & 2022).
Nanda, V., Private International Law: Twigg-Flesner, C., Foundations of Inter-
Avoiding and Resolving Conflict of national Commercial Law (2022).
Laws (2022). Vaige, L., Cross-Border Recognition of
Nagy, C.I., Cross-Border Litigation in Formalized Same-Sex Relationships
Central Europe: EU Private Inter- (2022).
national Law Before National Courts Varesis, F., Private International Law
(2022). and Arbitral Jurisdiction (2022).
Nishioka, K. et al. (eds.), Japanese Private Vlieks, C., Nationality and Statelessness
International Law (2021). in Europe (2022).
Obendiek, A.S., Data Governance: Value Yaqub, N., Parental Child Abduction to
Orders and Jurisdictional Conflicts Islamic Law Countries: A Child Rights
(2022). Analysis of the Legal Framework
Palazzo, N., Legal Recognition of Non- (2022).
Conjugal Families: New Frontiers in Zarra, G., Imperativeness in Private
Family Law in the US, Canada and International Law: A View from Europe
Europe (2022). (2022).

II. Articles

Aboueldahab, S. & Fin-Jasper, L., Poster Child of International Crim-

Universal Jurisdiction Cases in inal Justice, 31 Minn. J. Int’l L. 1
Germany: A Closer Look at the (2022).
502 T H E A M E R I CA N J O U R N A L O F C O M PA R AT I V E L AW [Vol. 71

Adams, C.W. & Mbilike, M.M., The Last Balleste, R., The Law of Space Cyber
Lecture: State Anti-SLAPP Statutes Operations: Gripping Mysteries, En-
and the Federal Courts, 96 St. John’s L. tangled Frontiers, and Security Chal-
Rev. 1 (2022). lenges, 13 Case W. Res. J.L. Tech. &
Ahmed, M., Private International Law Internet 146 (2022).
and Substantive Liability Issues in Bantekas, I., Transnational Arbitration

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajcl/article/71/2/500/7296010 by Tsinghua University user on 13 January 2024

Tort Litigation Against Multinational Agreements as Contracts: In Search of
Companies in the English Courts: Re- the Parties’ Common Intention, 38 Arb.
cent UK Supreme Court Decisions and Int’l 169 (2022).
Post-Brexit Implications, 18 J. Priv. Bantekas, I. & Ullah, I., Remedies Against
Int’l L. 56 (2022). Incomplete, Erroneous and Unclear
Alcolea, L.C., Arbitral Activism and International Arbitral Awards, 47 N.C.
Choice of Law Under the ICSID Con- J. Int’l L. 193 (2022).
vention, 21 Chinese J. Int’l L. 499 Banu, R., Teaching by Historicising Pri-
(2022). vate International Law, 18 Int’l J.L.
Aljarallah, M., Towards Improving Real Context 383 (2022).
Estate Rules of Kuwaiti Private Inter- Barnes, A., Canadian Cases in Private
national Law—A Critical Analytical International Law in 2021, 59 Can. Y.B.
Study, 2022 Int’l Rev. L. 139. Int’l L. 584 (2022).
Alselmi, A.N., A Preview on the Extent of Baum, I. & Solomon, D., The Least Un-
Universal Jurisdiction Application, 120 comfortable Choice: Why Delaware and
J.L. Pol’y & Globalization 24 (2022). England Win the Global Corporate Law
Amoakuh, K., Climate Change Litiga- Race, 73 S.C. L. Rev. 387 (2021).
tion and Rights-Based Strategies: Baumgartner, A.L., Enforcing the Fu-
Why International Human Rights Ap- gitive Slave Acts in the South: Fed-
proaches to Climate Change Are Not eralism, Irony, and the Conflict of
Easily Transplanted to the American Jurisdictions, 1787–1861, 88 J.S. Hist.
Legal System, 41 Stan. Env’t L.J. 195 475 (2022).
(2022). Baumgartner, S.P. & Whytock, C.A., En-
Archer, C., Forumless: Why Victims of the forcement of Foreign Judgments, Sys-
Uyghur Crisis Should Be Able to Vindi- temic Calibration, and the Global Law
cate Their Claims in Federal Court, 9 Market, 23 Theoretical Inquiries L. 119
Texas A&M L. Rev. 689 (2022). (2022).
Arzandeh, A., Brownlie II and the Service- Bazanth, B., An Unresolved Question:
Out Jurisdiction Under English Law, Optional Declarations at the Intersec-
71 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 727 (2022). tion of Jura Novit Curia, Competence-
Arzandeh, A., Exclusive Jurisdiction Competence, and Non Ultra Petita, 54
Clauses in International Trust Deeds, N.Y.U. J. Int’l L. & Pol. 1053 (2022).
41 Legal Stud. 527 (2021). Bazinas, S.V., Uniform Secured Transac-
Atkins, J., Overdue for Overhaul: The tions Law: The Model Inter-American
Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, 46 Law and the UNCITRAL Model Law
Tul. Mar. L.J. 481 (2022). on Secured Transactions Compared, 27
Autin, A.E., The ADA Aboard Foreign- Unif. L. Rev. 193 (2022).
Flag Cruise Ships: Addressing the Benedettelli, M.V., Determining the Ap-
Questions Left Unanswered by Spector plicable Law in Commercial and In-
v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd., 96 Tul. vestment Arbitration: Two Intertwined
L. Rev. 531 (2022). Road Maps for Conflicts-Solving, 37
Avraham-Giller, S., The Court’s Discre- Foreign Inv. L.J. 687 (2022).
tionary Power to Enforce Valid Juris- Bergson, I., Service Out in the Supreme
diction Clauses: Time for a Change?, 18 Court (Again), 138 Law Q. Rev. 199
J. Priv. Int’l L. 209 (2022). (2022).
Bachmeier, T. & Freytag, M., Discretional Berkoff, L.A. & Driscoll, T.A., Compelling
Elements in the Brussels Ia Regula- Arbitration of Non-Core Claims and
tion, 18 J. Priv. Int’l L. 296 (2022). Denying Arbitration of Core Claims:
Bagger, J., Dropping the Other Shoe: Per- Is Bifurcation Efficient and Fair?, 31
sonal Jurisdiction and Remote Tech- Norton J. Bankr. L. & Prac. 354 (2022).
nology in the Post-Pandemic World, 73 Bertram, D., Environmental Justice
Hastings L.J. 861 (2022). “Light”? Transnational Tort Litiga-
Ballas, I., Territoriality and Status in tion in the Corporate Anthropocene, 23
Human Rights Litigation: The Case of German L.J. 738 (2022).
Israel/Palestine, Soc. & Legal Stud. 1 Beskow, L.M. et al., Perspectives on
(2022). Choice of Law Challenges in Multistate
2023] P R I VAT E I N T E R N AT I O N A L L AW B I B L I O G R A P H Y 2 0 2 2 503

Precision Medicine Research, 9 J.L. & American Indians, 97 Wash. L. Rev. 725
Biosci. 1 (2022). (2022).
Betin, B., Lex Petrolea in International Cartier, C.P., Nestlé v. Doe and the Hu-
Arbitration—A Very English Dissent, manitarian Slavery Crisis in the Cocoa
15 J. World Energy L. & Bus. 295 (2022). Industry, 21 J. Int’l Bus. & L. 175 (2022).
Blue, N., Spirited Away: The EU’s Ad- Castin, L., The Effects of Post-Brexit In-

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajcl/article/71/2/500/7296010 by Tsinghua University user on 13 January 2024

equacy Decision for Japan as a solvencies in Belgium, Germany and
Roadmap for U.S. Privacy Law After the Netherlands, 30 Eur. Rev. Priv. L.
Schrems II, 21 Wash. U. Glob. Stud. L. 103 (2022).
Rev. 437 (2022). Chace, A., Is Extraterritoriality the
Boldbaatar, T. & Enkhbold, B., The Hague Golden Ticket Out of Corporate Li-
Conference and the Perspectives of ability? How the Modern-Day Willy
Mongolian Private International Law, Wonka’s Chocolate Factory Evaded
23 Y.B. Priv. Int’l L. 323 (2021–2022). Liability Under the Alien Tort Statute
Born, G., The Hague Convention on in Nestlé v. Doe, 38 Touro L. Rev. 257
Choice of Court Agreements: A Critical (2022).
Assessment, 169 U. Pa. L. Rev. 2079 Chambers, R. & Martin, J., Reimagining
(2022). Corporate Accountability: Moving Be-
Bradley, A.H., Creating a Civil Remedy in yond Human Rights Due Diligence, 18
Georgia for Survivors of Out-of-State N.Y.U. J.L. & Bus. 773 (2022).
Childhood Sexual Abuse, 75 Mercer L. Chan, D. & Teo, J.Y., Re-Formulating the
Rev. 1477 (2022). Test for Ascertaining the Proper Law of
Brannigan, N., Resolving Conflicts: an Arbitration Agreement: A Compara-
Establishing Forum Non Conveniens in tive Common Law Analysis, 17 J. Priv.
a New Hague Jurisdiction Convention, Int’l L. 439 (2021).
18 J. Priv. Int’l L. 83 (2022). Chander, A., Section 230 and the Inter-
Bray, R., Pretelli, I. & Wallis, D., Access to national Law of Facebook, 24 Yale J.L.
Justice in the EU for Victims of Socio- & Tech. 393 (2022).
Environmental Damages Occurring in Chen, S.-H., Signed, Sealed, & Undeliv-
Non-EU Countries–—The Proper Law ered: Unsuccessful Attempts of Foreign
of Torts in the Value Chain, 23 Y.B. Judgment Recognition Between the
Priv. Int’l L. 211 (2021–2022). U.S. and China, 16 Brook. J. Corp. Fin.
Brody, G., Implications of the Selection & Com. L. 167 (2022).
of Islamic Law in European Private Chen, Z., Is a Mummy a Person or a Prop-
International Law, 43 Mich. J. Int’l L. erty? The Classification and Choice
803 (2022). of Law of Cultural Objects in Private
Bumbaca, V., The Hague Convention on International Law, 10 Chinese J. Comp.
the Protection of Adults—Plea for and L. 274 (2022).
Practice of an “Adult” Approach, 23 Y.B. Chen, Z., Jurisdiction and Choice of Law
Priv. Int’l L. 365 (2021–2022). Rules over Electronic Consumer Con-
Buonaiuti, F.M., The Law Applicable to tracts: The Nexus Between the Con-
Succession, Between Unity and Split- cluded Contract and the Targeting
ting of the Relevant Legal Regime: The Activity, 29 Maastricht J. Eur. & Comp.
Role of Renvoi, 1 Italian Rev. Int’l & L. 328 (2022).
Comp. L. 405 (2022). Ciaptacz, J., Actio Pauliana Under the
Butler, G. (Comment), The Sky Reefer Brussels Ia Regulation—A Challenge
Loophole: How Modern Carriers for Principles, Objectives and Policies
Lessen Their Liability Through For- of EU Private International Law, 17 J.
eign Arbitration and Choice of Court Priv. Int’l L. 497 (2021).
Provisions—And Four Countries Who Ciolli, A.M., Territorial Constitutional
Stopped It, 46 Tul. Mar. L.J. 221 (2022). Law, 58 Idaho L. Rev. 206 (2022).
Campiglio, C., Circulation of Public Docu- Ciolli, A.M. & Hrelic, D.M., Third-Class
ments and Recognition of Civil Status Citizens: Unequal Protection Within
Situations—Lights and Shadows, 23 United States Territories, 55 Suffolk U.
Y.B. Priv. Int’l L. 1 (2021–2022). L. Rev. 179 (2022).
Caravaca, A.L.C. & Gonzalez, J.C., Pri- Cluxton, D., Choice of Forum in Passenger
vate International Law Bibliography Claims Under the Montreal Conven-
(2020), 14 Cuadernos Derecho Trans- tion 1999: A Two-Dimensional Solution
national 600 (2022). to a Three-Dimensional Problem, 48
Carlson, K.M., Bringing Congress and Syracuse J. Int’l L. & Com. 333 (2021).
Indians Back into Federal Indian Colangelo, A.J., Procedural Jus Cogens,
Law: The Restatement of the Law of 60 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 377 (2022).
504 T H E A M E R I CA N J O U R N A L O F C O M PA R AT I V E L AW [Vol. 71

Comment, Enforcement of Foreign Jurisdiction Is No Longer Justified, 55

Awards Against Non-Signatories Ind. L. Rev. 233 (2022).
Under the New York Convention in Dewan, P., The “Status-Quo” of Private
India: A Critique of the Decision in International Law in India for the Pro-
Gemini Bay, 54 N.Y.U. J. Int’l L. & Pol. tection of Children from International
741 (2022). Parental Abduction, 5 Int’l J.L. Mgmt.

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajcl/article/71/2/500/7296010 by Tsinghua University user on 13 January 2024

Comment, Servotronics and Certiorari: & Human. 1374 (2022).
The Imminent Supreme Court Decision Doan, L.D. & Trinh, T.H., Sustaining
and Why Private International Arbi- Vietnamese Economic Development by
trations Are “Foreign or International Improving the Transparency of Choice
Tribunals” Under 28 U.S.C § 1782, 30 of Law Decisions, 54 Akron L. Rev. 841
Tul. J. Int’l & Comp. L. 171 (2022). (2021).
Cook, G.C. & D’Entremont, A.R., No End Dodge, W.S., Substituted Service and the
in Sight? Navigating the “Vast Terrain” Hague Service Convention, 63 Wm. &
of Personal Jurisdiction in Social Media Mary L. Rev. 1485 (2022).
Cases After Ford, 73 Ala. L. Rev. 621 Ellis, N., Two Recent Decisions on Juris-
(2022). diction in U.S. Maritime Law, 57 Tort
Cornett, J.M., The Rulification of General Trial & Ins. Prac. L.J. 10 (2022).
Personal Jurisdiction and the Search Emerson, R.W. & Hunt, Z.R., Franchisees,
for the Exceptional Case, 89 Tenn. L. Consumers, and Employees: Choice
Rev. 571 (2022). and Arbitration, 13 Wm. & Mary Bus.
Cotter, T.F., Extraterritorial Damages L. Rev. 487 (2022).
in Copyright Law, 74 Fla. L. Rev. 123 Eskenazi, D. & Mechle, T., Recovery of
(2022). Works of Art Under International Law,
Coyle, J.F., “Contractually Valid” Forum 34 Int’l L. Practicum 15 (2022).
Selection Clauses, 108 Iowa L. Rev. 127 Essadik, S.E., The Particularity of the
(2022). Conflict of Laws in Morocco: The
Crootof, R., War Torts, 97 N.Y.U. L. Rev. Inversed Case of the Personal Statute
1063 (2022). of Foreigners, 3 Indon. Priv. L. Rev. 13
Crystal, N.M. & Giannoni-Crystal, F., (2022).
Choice of Law and Risk Management Ewell, C., Hathaway, O.A. & Nohle, E.,
for Conflict of Interest, 16 Charleston L. Has the Alien Tort Statute Made a Dif-
Rev. 1 (2022). ference? A Historical, Empirical, and
Cuniberti, G., A Conflict of Laws Com- Normative Assessment, 107 Cornell L.
panion—Essays in Honour of Adrian Rev. 1205 (2022).
Briggs (Book Review), 71 Int’l & Comp. Favero Vaughn, G. & Duggal, K., On
L.Q. 497 (2022). International Arbitration, Choice of
Dawwas, A., Dépeçage of Contract in Substantive Law, and the CISG: A Case
Choice of Law: Hague Principles and Law Study, 38 Arb. Int’l 187 (2022).
Arab Laws Compared, 17 J. Priv. Int’l Fazilatfar, H., In Defense of Separability:
L. 473 (2021). Prima Paint, Buckeye, and Rent-A-
De Miguel Asensio, P., Protection of Repu- Center, 54 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 183 (2022).
tation, Good Name and Personality Fazilatfar, H., Public Policy Norms and
Rights in Cross-Border Digital Media, Choice-of-Law Methodology Adjust-
71 GRUR Int’l 1019 (2022). ments in International Arbitration, 18
De Wit, R., Recent Amendments to the S.C. J. Int’l L. & Bus. 88 (2022).
Private International Law Rules on Fernando, M., Children’s Objections
Carriage of Goods by Sea in the Bel- in Hague Child Abduction Conven-
gian Shipping Code: An Uncalled-for tion Proceedings in Australia and the
Exercise with Unfortunate Results, 14 “Strength of Feeling” Requirement, 30
Eur. J. Com. Contract L. 44 (2022). Int’l J. Children’s Rts. 729 (2022).
Decker, A.C., Working in Space: The Final Flatt, V., The Myth of State Surface Water
Frontier of Remote Work, 42 N. Ill. U. L. Regulation—The Fifty-Year Flaw of the
Rev. 330 (2022). Federal Water Pollution Control Act
Dederer, H.-G. & Beham, M.P., The Jurisdictional Debate, 52 Env’t L. 331
German-Polish Cultural Property De- (2022).
bate—Can Pragmatic Solutions Over- Fletcher, M.L., Symposium, Reflections
come a Convoluted Controversy?, 41 on the Restatement of the Law of
Polish Y.B. Int’l L. 81 (2021). American Indians, 97 Wash. L. Rev.
Devito, S., On the Death of Diver- (2022).
sity Jurisdiction: An Empirical Forrester, I., Jurisdiction, Forum and
Study Establishing that Diversity Enforcement of Judgements: The
2023] P R I VAT E I N T E R N AT I O N A L L AW B I B L I O G R A P H Y 2 0 2 2 505

Challenge of Cooperation Between Godt, C. & Burchardi, M., Due Diligence

Courts Before and After Brexit, 91 IUS and the Regulation of Transnational
Gentium 251 (2022). Economic Activity: Regulation (EU) No
Freer, R.D., From Contacts to Related- 511/2014 Compared to Other EU Due
ness: Invigorating the Promise of “Fair Diligence Schemes, 95 IUS Gentium
Play and Substantial Justice” in Per- 547 (2022).

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajcl/article/71/2/500/7296010 by Tsinghua University user on 13 January 2024

sonal Jurisdiction Doctrine, 73 Ala. L. Goldar, M.G., The Inadequate Approach
Rev. 583 (2022). of Directive (EU) 2019/771 Towards
Fu, P., The Doctrine of Kompetenz- the Circular Economy, 29 Maastricht J.
Kompetenz: A Sino-French Compara- Eur. & Comp. L. 9 (2022).
tive Perspective, 52 H.K. L.J. 259 Golden J.M. & Lee, T.H., Federalism, Pri-
(2022). vate Rights, and Article III Adjudica-
Gaillard, O., The Professio Iuris in Swiss tion, 108 Va. L. Rev. 1547 (2022).
Private International Law, 23 Y.B. Priv. Goldstein, G., The Legal Certainty Ex-
Int’l L. 393 (2021–2022). ception—Towards a New Subjective
Gardner, M. et al., The False Promise of Localisation in the Conflict of Laws
General Jurisdiction, 73 Ala. L. Rev. Methodology, 23 Y.B. Priv. Int’l L. 25
455 (2022). (2021–2022).
Garnett, R., Determining the Appropriate González Souto, M., Through the ATS
Forum by the Applicable Law, 71 Int’l & Door, Now What?, 26 UCLA J. Int’l L. &
Comp. L.Q. 589 (2022). Foreign Affs. 151 (2022).
Garriga Suau, G. & Whytock, C.A., Choice Gossl, S.L., Recognition of a Status Ac-
of Law for Immovable Property Issues: quired Abroad: Germany, 14 Cuadernos
New Directions in the European Union Derecho Transnacional 1130 (2022).
and the United States, 74 Revista Gruenbaum, D., From Statehood to Ef-
Española Derecho Internacional 81 fectiveness: The Law of Unrecognised
(2022). States in Private International Law, 86
Gensler, S. & Michalski, R., The Million- RabelsZ 577 (2022).
Dollar Diversity Docket, 47 BYU L. Gu, W. & Tam, J., The Global Rise of Inter-
Rev. 1653 (2022). national Commercial Courts: Typology
Gentile, G. & Lynskey, O., Deficient by and Power Dynamics, 22 Chi. J. Int’l L.
Design? The Transnational Enforce- 443 (2022).
ment of the GDPR, 71 Int’l & Comp. Haedicke, M., Anti-Suit Injunctions,
L.Q. 799 (2022). FRAND Policies and the Conflict Be-
Geradin, D. & Katsifis, D., The Use and tween Overlapping Jurisdictions, 71
Abuse of Anti-Suit Injunctions in SEP GRUR Int’l 101 (2022).
Litigation: Is There a Way Forward?, 71 Hamid, D., Fadhel, A. & Khalid, R.O., Con-
GRUR Int’l 603 (2022). flict of Laws in Civil Liability Arising
Gevurtz, F.A., Extraterritorial Applica- from Defective Products: A Compara-
tion of Statutes and Regulations, 70 tive Analytical Study, 98 J. Sharia & L.
Am. J. Comp. L. i347 (Supp. 2022). (2022).
Giannini, T.R., Living with History: Will Hamilton, R.J., Platform-Enabled Crimes:
the Alien Tort Statute Become a Badge Pluralizing Accountability When Social
of Shame or Badge of Honor?, 132 Yale Media Companies Enable Perpetrators
L.J.F. 814 (2022). to Commit Atrocities, 63 B.C. L. Rev.
Gibb, A. & Tsang, K.F., Conflicting Limi- 1349 (2022).
tation Periods: A Comparison Between Hartley, T.C., Basic Principles of Jurisdic-
Hong Kong and Mainland China, 5 tion in Private International Law: The
Cardozo J. Int’l & Comp. L. (2022). European Union, the United States
Gibbons, N., Mass Migration, Universal and England, 71 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 211
Jurisdiction, and the Alien Tort Statute, (2022).
41 Rev. Litig. 243 (2022). Hathaway, O.A., Myths and Realities of
Gil, E.D., Rethinking Foreign Affairs Def- Global Governance, 45 Harv. J.L. &
erence, 63 B.C. L. Rev. 1603 (2022). Pub. Pol’y 31 (2022).
Gilchrist, H.R., No Hiding from Henkel, C. & S̆ imunović, L., Set-Offs in
Justice: Universal Jurisdiction in Do- Cross-Border Bankruptcy: A Compara-
mestic Courts, 57 Tex. Int’l L.J. 215 tive Study of the United States, the
(2022). European Union, Germany, Austria,
Gligorijevic, J., Taming the “Chilling and Croatia, 30 Tul. J. Int’l & Comp. L.
Effect” of Defamation Law: English 1 (2022).
Experience and Implications for Aus- Hess, F.K., US Anti‐Suit Injunctions and
tralia, 50 Fed. L. Rev. 221 (2022). German Anti‐Anti‐Suit Injunctions in
506 T H E A M E R I CA N J O U R N A L O F C O M PA R AT I V E L AW [Vol. 71

SEP Disputes, 25 J. World Intell. Prop. Kamal, A., The Alien Tort Statute & the
536 (2022). Contemporary International Legal
Hing-chau, L. & Jing, Q., Protective Juris- Order: Is the Retention of the Presump-
diction Under the Hong Kong National tion Against Extraterritoriality Justi-
Security Law: Legitimacy and Impact, fied?, 54 N.Y.U. J. Int’l L. & Pol. 1089
21 Chinese J. Int’l L. 115 (2022). (2022).

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajcl/article/71/2/500/7296010 by Tsinghua University user on 13 January 2024

Ho-Dac, M., Recognition of a Status Ac- Karayanni, M., The Private International
quired Abroad: France, 14 Cuadernos Law of Class Actions: A Functional Ap-
Derecho Transnat’l 1169 (2022). proach, 422 Recueil des cours (2022).
Huang, J., Conflicting Declarations Under Katne, D.R., Torture, Ethics, Account-
the Hague Service Convention Amid ability?, 53 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 513 (2022).
the Russo-Ukrainian War: Dilemmas Katselli Proukaki, E., Forced Displace-
and Preliminary Solutions, 116 Am. J. ment, Prevention from Returning and
Int’l L. 752 (2022). the Jurisdiction of the International
Huang, J., Conflicts and Tentative Solu- Criminal Court, 91 Nordic J. Int’l L.
tions to Protecting Personal Data in In- 355 (2022).
vestment Arbitration, 32 Eur. J. Int’l L. Kellmann, C.D., Choice-of-Law Rules
1191 (2022). Governing Preclusive Effects: On Tran-
Huo, Z. & Yip, M., Extraterritoriality of scending Res Judicata’s State of Am-
Chinese Law: Myths, Realities and biguity in International Commercial
the Future, 9 Chinese J. Comp. L. 329 Arbitration, 40 ASA Bull. 27 (2022).
(2021). Khanderia, S., The Prevalence of “Juris-
Hylton, J., Time for a New Shoe? Making diction” in the Recognition and Enforce-
Sense of Specific Jurisdiction, 87 Mo. L. ment of Foreign Civil and Commercial
Rev. 1 (2022). Judgments in India and South Africa:
Ienca, M. & Malgieri, G., Mental Data A Comparative Analysis, 21 Oxford U.
Protection and the GDPR, 9 J.L. & Commonwealth L.J. 181 (2021).
Biosci. 1 (2022). Kipp, A.R., Jurisdiction at Work: Spe-
Iossa, A., Posting Highly Mobile Workers: cific Personal Jurisdiction in FLSA
Between Labour Law Territoriality and Collective Actions After Bristol-Myers
Supply Chains of Logistics Work—A Squibb, 38 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 941 (2022).
Critical Reading of Dobersberger, 51 Kohler, C., Judicial Cooperation in Civil
Indus. L.J. 138 (2022). Matters After Brexit—The Case of the
Jamshidi, M., The Political Economy of British Application to Rejoin the Lu-
Foreign Sovereign Immunity, 73 Hast- gano Convention of 2007, 23 Y.B. Priv.
ings L.J. 585 (2022). Int’l L. 81 (2021–2022).
Jault-Seseke, F., The French Duty of Care Koppel, G.S., Interstate Federalism Im-
After a Few Years of Application, 23 plications of a Uniform Code of State
Y.B. Priv. Int’l L. 245 (2021–2022). Civil Procedure: Lessons from the Draft
Jensen, O. & Scherer, M., Empirical Re- of the Third Restatement of Conflict of
search on the Alleged Invalidity of Ar- Laws and Shady Grove, 50 Cap. U. L.
bitration Agreements: Success Rates Rev. 191 (2022).
and Applicable Law in Setting Aside Kostin, A.A. & Pesnya, M., The Recogni-
and Enforcement Proceedings, 39 J. tion of Foreign Judgments on Personal
Int’l Arb. 331 (2022). Status Under Russian Law (Historical
Jia, M., Special Courts, Global China, 62 Aspects and Current Issues), 18 J. Priv.
Va. J. Int’l L. 559 (2022). Int’l L. 146 (2022).
Jolly, S. & Malla, P., Recognition and En- Kovács, D., Enforcing Foreign Arbitral
forcement of Foreign Divorce Judgments Awards in Hungary, 76 Disp. Resol. J.
in India and Nepal: A Comparative Ana- 115 (2022).
lysis, 11 Glob. J. Comp. L. 197 (2022). Krisch, N., Jurisdiction Unbound:
Jordan, M., Utilizing Foreign Legal As- (Extra)Territorial Regulation as
sistance Actions to Promote Corporate Global Governance, 33 Eur. J. Int’l L.
Accountability for Human-Rights 481 (2022).
Abuses, 132 Yale L.J.F. 844 (2022). Kruger, T., Current-Day International
Kadner Graziano, T., 50 Years of the 1971 Child Abduction: Does Brussels IIb
Hague Traffic Accident Convention— Live Up to the Challenges?, 18 J. Priv.
Time to Say Goodbye, 23 Y.B. Priv. Int’l Int’l L. 159 (2022).
L. 59 (2021–2022). Lafarre, A. & Rombouts, B., Towards
Kahn, J.S., Anthropology, Law, and the Mandatory Human Rights Due Dili-
Problem of Incommensurability, 73 Ala. gence: Assessing Its Impact on Fun-
L. Rev. 783 (2022). damental Labour Standards in Global
2023] P R I VAT E I N T E R N AT I O N A L L AW B I B L I O G R A P H Y 2 0 2 2 507

Value Chains, 13 Eur. J. Risk Reg. 567 Personal Jurisdiction, 64 Wm. & Mary
(2022). L. Rev. 265 (2022).
Lahav, A.D., The New Privity in Personal Mancuso, S., The Possible Path Towards
Jurisdiction, 73 Ala. L. Rev. 539 (2022). the Principles of BRICS Commercial
Larson, T.B., Would Hitler Define Jews Contracts Law, 102 IUS Gentium 359
Living in His Germany as Citizens? (2022).

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajcl/article/71/2/500/7296010 by Tsinghua University user on 13 January 2024

An Amendment to the Foreign Sover- Marr, A. et al., International Litigation,
eign Immunities Act Could Solve This 56 Year Rev. (ABA) 227 (2022).
Legal Puzzle for United States Courts, Marshall, B., Asymmetric Jurisdiction
52 Cal. W. Int’l L.J. 643 (2022). Clauses and the Anomaly Created by
Lefranc, S., A Tale of Many Jurisdictions: 31(2) of the Brussels I Recast Regu-
How Universal Jurisdiction Is Creating lation, 71 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 297
a Transnational Judicial Space, 48 J.L. (2022).
& Soc’y 573 (2021). McAvoy, R., How Can Federal Actors
Levina, D., Jurisdiction at the Place of Compete on Noncompetes? Examining
Performance of a Contract Revisited: the Need for and Possibility of Federal
A Case for the Theory of Characteristic Action on Noncompetition Agreements,
Performance in EU Civil Procedure, 18 126 Dick. L. Rev. 651 (2022).
J. Priv. Int’l L. 266 (2022). McGonigle, L.B., Using Strategic Liti-
Liew, Y.K., Choice of Law for Cross-Border gation and Universal Jurisdiction to
Trust Disputes in Japan: The Case for Advance Accountability for Serious
Adopting the Hague Trusts Conven- International Crimes, 16 Int’l J. Tran-
tion, 9 J. Int’l & Comp. L. 75 (2022). sitional Just. 363 (2022).
Liew, Y.K., Cross-Border Trust Disputes Mckenzie, B.A., Home Field Advantage:
and Choice of Law in East Asia, 31 Establishing Personal Jurisdiction
Wash. Int’l L.J. 117 (2021). Over Illegal Online Sports Streaming
Liew, Y.K., Trusts and Choice of Law Websites in Copyright Infringement
Rules in Taiwan, 17 Nat’l Taiwan U. L. Litigation, 61 Washburn L.J. 611
Rev. 41 (2022). (2022).
Listwa, D.B. & Brilmayer, L., Jurisdic- Meier, L., Simplifying Choice-of-Law
tional Problems, Comity Solutions, 100 Interest Analysis, 74 Okla. L. Rev. 337
Tex. L. Rev. 1373 (2022). (2022).
Liukkunen, U., Decent Work and Private Michaels, R., Private Law Theory and the
International Law, 86 RabelsZ 876 “Global Legal Community,” 23 German
(2022). L.J. 851 (2022).
Loos, S., Assisted Dying Before the Mikuta, J., The Class Action Struggle:
ECtHR: General Rules for National Re- Should Bristol-Myers’s Limit on Per-
gulations, 22 Medical L. Int’l 93 (2022). sonal Jurisdiction Apply to Class Ac-
MacQueen, H.L., Third Ole Lando Me- tions?, 71 Emory L.J. 325 (2021).
morial Lecture: European Contract Min, W., Determining the Law Applicable
Law in the Post-Brexit and (Post?)- to the Merits in International Arbitra-
Pandemic United Kingdom, 30 Eur. tion, 54 N.Y.U. J. Int’l L. & Pol. 1101
Rev. Priv. L. 3 (2022). (2022).
Maia, C. & De Carvalho Ramos, A., Uni- Moreno Rodríguez, J.A. & Cazal Zaldivar,
versalism of Human Rights and Sub- L.E., The Paraguayan Experience in
sidiarity of International Jurisdiction: Modernizing Its Secured Transactions
The Subtle Resistance?, 3 Revista Legal Framework, 27 Unif. L. Rev. 226
Jurídica 227 (2022). (2022).
Maireg Biresaw, S.M., Appraisal of Mostowik, P. & Figura-Góralczyk, E.,
the Success of the Instruments of Ordre Public and Non-Enforcement
International Commercial Arbitra- of Judgments in Intra-EU Civil Mat-
tion vis-à-vis International Com- ters: Remarks on Some Recent Polish-
mercial Litigation and Mediation in German Cases, 18 J. Priv. Int’l L. 317
the Harmonization of the Rules of (2022).
Transnational Commercial Dispute Mskhvilidze, T., The Dead Sea Scrolls
Resolution, 2022 J. Disp. Resol. 1. Case: Features of Intellectual Property
Mammino, C., Recent Developments in Disputes in Private International Law,
International Mediation, 23 Y.B. Priv. 23 Law & World 184 (2022).
Int’l L. 439 (2021–2022). Mulugeta Menkir, B., Reciprocity and
Manaris, Z., Ford v. Where Are We? The Execution of Foreign Judgments Under
Revival of the Sliding Scale to Govern Ethiopian Law—Latest Development,
the Supreme, Court’s New “Relating to” 23 Y.B. Priv. Int’l L. 281 (2021–2022).
508 T H E A M E R I CA N J O U R N A L O F C O M PA R AT I V E L AW [Vol. 71

Murphy, M.H., Assessing the Implications Note, Extraterritorial Avoidance Actions

of Schrems II for EU–US Data Flow, 71 Under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, 135
Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 245 (2022). Harv. L. Rev. 2173 (2022).
Nersessian, D. & Pachamanova, D., Note, Foreign Antisuit Injunctions and
Human Trafficking in the Global the Settlement Effect, 116 Nw. U. L.
Supply Chain: Using Machine Learning Rev. 1577 (2022).

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajcl/article/71/2/500/7296010 by Tsinghua University user on 13 January 2024

to Understand Corporate Disclosures Note, Foreign Territorial Sea-Zures: Art-
Under the UK Modern Slavery Act, 35 icle I Supports the Application of the
Harv. Hum. Rts. J. 1 (2022). Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act
Nguyen, T.T., Transnational Corpor- to Drug Trafficking Within Foreign Ter-
ations and Environmental Pollution in ritorial Seas, 74 Fla. L. Rev. 345 (2022).
Vietnam—Realising the Potential of Note, Getting “Arising out of ” Right: Ford
Private International Law in Environ- Motor Company and the Purpose of the
mental Protection, 18 J. Priv. Int’l L. 238 “Arising out of ” Prong in the Minimum
(2022). Contacts Analysis, 97 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 315
Nishioka, K., The Enforcement of (2022).
Cross-Border Competition Law Claims Note, Hetronic Int’l, Inc. v. Hetronic Ger-
in Asia-Pacific and Choice of Forum many Gmbh: The Lanham Act, Its
Agreements: Private Litigation or Arbi- Extraterritorial Reach, and the Ever-
tration?, 10 J. Antitrust Enf’t 279 (2022). Deepening Circuit Split, 24 Tul. J. Tech.
Nord, N., The International Commission & Intell. Prop. 261 (2022).
on Civil Status—Present and Future Note, Illicit Antiquities and the Internet:
of International Cooperation in Civil The Trafficking of Heritage on Digital
Status Matters, 23 Y.B. Priv. Int’l L. 135 Platforms, 54 N.Y.U. J. Int’l L. & Pol.
(2021–2022). 659 (2022).
Nordlund, F., Determining the Applicable Note, Implementing the Hague Judg-
Law to the Arbitration Agreement in ments Convention, 97 N.Y.U. L. Rev.
the Absence of a Choice of Law Clause 1507 (2022).
Under Hong Kong Law: A Call for Re- Note, Mass Migration, Universal Juris-
newed Internationalism, 38 Arb. Int’l diction, and the Alien Tort Statute, 41
43 (2022). Rev. Litig. 243 (2022).
Noseda, F., Equitable Ownership, Butter Note, The Real Price of Chocolate:
and Donkeys: Setting Out a Vision for Toma­sella v. Nestlé USA, Inc. and the
the Future of the Hague Trust Conven- Unrestrained Existence of Tainted
tion, 28 Tr. & Trs. 924 (2022). Supply Chains, 94 Temp. L. Rev. 547
Note, Anti-Suit Injunctions and FRAND: (2022).
The Law of What Land?, 63 B.C. L. Rev. Note, A Regional Custos Morum? Cor-
2821 (2022). porate Liability Under International
Note, The Best Data Plan Is to Have a Law in North America After Nevsun
Game Plan: Obstacles and Solutions to Resources and Nestlé, 54 Case W. Res. J.
Reaching International Data Privacy Int’l L. 385 (2022).
Agreements, 28 Mich. Tech. L. Rev. 385 Note, Section 337 and Extraterritorial
(2022). Conduct: The United States Inter-
Note, Bittersweet: A Potential Avenue to national Trade Commission’s Over-
International Tort Liability for American reach, 26 Tex. Rev. L. & Pol. 633 (2022).
Companies in the Cocoa Supply Chain, Note, A Third-Party Beneficiary Theory
91 U. Cin. L. Rev. 494 (2022). of Corporate Liability for Labor Viola-
Note, Boeing, Boeing, Gone: General Jur- tions in International Supply Chains,
isdiction over Corporations, Principal 108 Va. L. Rev. 1449 (2022).
Place of Business, and a Second Look Note, This Content Is Unavailable in Your
at the Total Activities Test, 88 Brook. L. Geographic Region: The United States’
Rev. 275 (2022). and the European Union’s Implementa-
Note, Bubbles over Barriers: Amending tion of Anti-Circumvention Measures,
the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act 55 Vand. J. Transnat’l L. 485 (2022).
for Cyber Accountability, 12 J. Nat’l Sec. Note, Why Can’t We Be FRANDs? Anti-
L. & Pol’y 659 (2022). Suit Injunctions, International Comity,
Note, A Corporate Human Rights Due and International Commercial Arbitra-
Diligence Law for California, 55 U.C. tion in Standard-Essential Patent Liti-
Davis L. Rev. 2421 (2022). gation, 75 Vand. L. Rev. 1609 (2022).
Note, Curing Canaries: Transnational Novikova, T.V., The Prospects for the Lex
Remedies for Peruvian Communities Im- Validatis Doctrine Application Under
pacted by Foreign Extractive Projects, 60 the Principle of the Closest Connection
Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 604 (2022). in Private International Law of the
2023] P R I VAT E I N T E R N AT I O N A L L AW B I B L I O G R A P H Y 2 0 2 2 509

Russian Federation, 55 Perm U. Herald Abroad: Some Remarks from the Aspect
Jurid. Sci. 127 (2022). of Domestic Private International Law,
Ntahiraja, B., The Legality and Scope 13 Union U.L. Sch. Rev. 177 (2022).
of Universal Jurisdiction in Criminal Peari, S., Choice of Law in International
Matters, 91 Nordic J. Int’l L. 390 (2022). Contracts: Global Perspectives on the
Obiri-Korang, P., Party Autonomy: Pro- Hague Principles, 37 Bank. & Fin. L.

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajcl/article/71/2/500/7296010 by Tsinghua University user on 13 January 2024

moting Legal Certainty and Predict- Rev. 391 (2022).
ability in International Commercial Peari, S. & Sharkey, N., Pairing Inter-
Contracts Through Choice of Law, 2022 national Taxation and Conflict of Laws:
J. S. African L. 106. Common Challenges and Reciprocal
O’Hara, K., Accidents on the High Seas Lessons, 41 U. Queensl. L.J. 211 (2022).
and Flags of Convenience: Whether the Petty, J., Neither Here Nor There: Wire
BBNJ Draft Treaty Will Address Insuf- Fraud and the False Binary of Terri-
ficient Regulatory Compliance by Open toriality Under Morrison, 89 U. Chi. L.
Registry States, 50 Ga. J. Int’l & Comp. Rev. 803 (2022).
L. 704 (2022). Pohlman, Z.B., State Statutory Interpret-
Ojiegbe, C.P., The Overview of Private ation and Horizontal Choice of Law, U.
International Law in Nigeria, 17 J. Kan. L. Rev. 505 (2022).
Priv. Int’l L. 601 (2021). Pradhan, D.P.N., Conflict of Laws Rules
O’Rourke, A., A Legal Political Assess- in Nepal, 23 Bus. L. Int’l 71 (2022).
ment of Challenges to Abortion Laws Rabkin, J.A. & Lerner, C.S., Criminal
by Anti-Choice Activists in Australia Justice Is Local: Why States Disre-
and the Progression of Abortion Law gard Universal Jurisdiction for Human
in Australia and the United States, 70 Rights Abuses, 55 Vand. J. Transnat’l
Am. J. Comp. L. 162 (2022). L. 375 (2022).
Ortolani, P., The 2005 Hague Conven- Rass-Masson, L., The Importance of Pri-
tion on Choice of Court Agreements vate International Law for the New
and the New York Convention: Hostile EU-Africa Strategic Partnership, 2022
Takeover, or Harmony in Diversity?, 2 Int’l Bus. L.J. 183.
Tijdschrift Arb. 32 (2022). Rensberger, J.L., Choice of Law and Time,
Ostendorf, P., The Choice of Foreign Law 89 Tenn. L. Rev. 419 (2022).
in (Predominantly) Domestic Con- Riegels, C., Choice of Law in Relation to
tracts and the Controversial Quest for Contribution Claims, 138 Law Q. Rev.
a Genuine International Element: Po- 26 (2022).
tential for Future Judicial Conflicts Be- Rielaender, F., Aligning the Brussels Re-
tween the UK and the EU?, 17 J. Priv. gime with the Representative Actions
Int’l L. 421 (2021). Directive, 71 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 107
O’Sullivan, J.R., The Government’s Power (2022).
to Bring Transnational Securities Rielaender, F., Financial Torts and EU
Fraudsters to Account: Dodd-Frank Private International Law: Will the
Rendered Morrison Irrelevant, 59 Am. Search for the Place of “Financial
Crim. L. Rev. 231 (2022). Damage” Ever Come to an End?, 18 J.
Pager, D.A. & Sant’Ambrogio, M., Trading Priv. Int’l L. 28 (2022).
Up: Is Section 337 the New ATS?, 107 Ristroph, E.B., Human Rights Due Dili-
Iowa L. Rev. 1159 (2022). gence: Why It Matters and Why It’s Not
Pakzad, M., Alemzadeh, M. & Mehdipoor, Enough Without Access to Remedies
M., Conflict of Laws on Adoption in for Human Rights Violations, 48 Syra-
Iranian and French Law, 18 J. Fam. cuse J. Int’l L. & Com. 417 (2021).
Rsch. 411 (2022). Robinson, V., State Policy in Federal
Parisi, F., Pi, D. & Guerra, A., Access to Courts: Stabilizing the Burford Absten-
Evidence in Private International Law, tion Doctrine, 89 U. Chi. L. Rev. 2109
23 Theoretical Inq. L. 77 (2022). (2022).
Parker, B.T., Piracy on the Internet High Romano, G.P., European Family Courts
Seas: Using Hostis Humani Generis to and Inter-Country (Arbitration?)
Combat Cybercriminals, 29 Geo. Mason Courts to Deal with Cross-Border Cus-
L. Rev. 593 (2022). tody Disputes, 23 Y.B. Priv. Int’l L. 155
Partiti, E., Private Processes and Public (2021–2022).
Values: Disciplining Trade in Forest Ruiz Sutil, C., International Removals
and Ecosystem Risk Commodities in Contexts of Violence Between Euro-
via Non-Financial Due Diligence, 11 pean Asylum Law and the Best Inter-
Transnat’l Env’t L. 141 (2022). ests of the Child—The CJEU Case
Pavlovic, M., Conflict of Law Aspects A.V.B., of 2 August 2021, 23 Y.B. Priv.
of Same-Sex Partnership Concluded Int’l L. 349 (2021–2022).
510 T H E A M E R I CA N J O U R N A L O F C O M PA R AT I V E L AW [Vol. 71

Russo, T. & de Donno, G., The Choice of in the United States, 50 Denv. J. Int’l L.
the Shari’a as Governing Law in Ar- & Pol’y 209 (2022).
bitration Proceedings, 33 Eur. Bus. L. Solimine, M.E., Recognition and En-
Rev. 881 (2022). forcement of Foreign Judgments in
Rutherglen, G., A Choice by Any Other American Courts and the Limits of the
Name: Ad Hoc Substitutes for Choice of Law Market Model, 23 Theoretical Inq.

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajcl/article/71/2/500/7296010 by Tsinghua University user on 13 January 2024

Law, 63 Va. J. Int’l L. Online 1 (2022). L. 97 (2022).
Ryerson, C., Pinkert, D. & Kelly, A., Solum, L.B. & Crema, M., Originalism
Seeking Justice: The State of Trans- and Personal Jurisdiction: Several
national Corporate Accountability, 132 Questions and a Few Answers, 73 Ala.
Yale L.J.F. 787 (2022). L. Rev. 483 (2022).
Sahoo, S. & Sahoo, S., Analysing the Con- Spencer, A.B., Rule 4(k), Nationwide Per-
flict of Law with Regard to Cross-Border sonal Jurisdiction, and the Civil Rules
Same-Sex Marriages Under Private Advisory Committee: Lessons from At-
International Law, 2 Jus Corpus L.J. tempted Reform, 73 Ala. L. Rev. 607
329 (2021–2022). (2022).
Salibová, K.S., Identification of Domestic Spica, J.P., Conflict of Laws and the Tran-
Law in Relation to Facultative Conflict sitivity of the “Relation Back” of Special
of Laws, 12 Law. Q. 262 (2022). Powers of Appointment, 41 Mich. Prob.
Salvat, M.A.C., How to Keep Attention in & Est. Plan. J. 3 (2021–2022).
Online Teaching: Applying the Cycle of Stamp, J.T., U.S.-Mexico Cross-Border
Accelerated Learning to Private Inter- Shootings & Hernandez v. Mesa (2020):
national Law, 14 Cuadernos Derecho Moving from Segregationist Security to
Transnat’l 707 (2022). Transnational Security via Extradition
Sandefur, T., The Federalism Problems Policy, 28 U.C. Davis J. Int’l L. & Pol’y
with the Indian Child Welfare Act, 26 87 (2022).
Tex. Rev. L. & Pol’y 429 (2022). Standen, J., Republication Liability on
Savelsberg, J.J. & Philips, M., Epistemic the Web, 105 Marq. L. Rev. 669 (2022).
Power of Universal Jurisdiction: Steinman, A.N., Beyond Bristol-Myers:
Spreading Knowledge About Mass Personal Jurisdiction over Class Ac-
Atrocity Crimes, 31 Minn. J. Int’l L. 57 tions, 97 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1215 (2022).
(2022). Storrow, R.F., Legacies of a Pandemic: Re-
Schmitz, B., Rethinking the Public mote Attestation and Electronic Wills,
Interest in Consumer Protection: A 48 Mitchell Hamline L. Rev. 826 (2022).
Critical Comparative Analysis of Art- Stratton, H., Against Renvoi in Commer-
icle 6 Rome I Regulation, 9 Eur. J. cial Law, 17 J. Priv. Int’l L. 524 (2021).
Comp. L. & Gov. 210 (2022). Sturley, M.F. & Ammerman, M.H., Recent
Scoville, R.M., U.S. Foreign Relations Law Developments in Admiralty and Mari-
from the Outside In, 47 Yale J. Int’l L. time Law at the National Level and in
1 (2022). the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits, 46 Tul.
Shakargy, S., Whose Law Is It Anyway? Mar. L.J. 531 (2022).
The Case of Matrimonial Property in Subramanian, A., An Indian Revolution
Israel, 23 Theoretical Inq. L. 165 (2022). in Conflict of Laws, 5 Int’l J.L. Mgmt. &
Shen, W., Assessing the Strategic Situ- Human. 2436 (2022).
ation Underlying International Anti- Świerczyński, M. & Jokubauskas, R., Spe-
trust Cooperation, 36 Emory Int’l L. cial Jurisdiction in Infringements of
Rev. 483 (2022). Personality Rights, 41 Polish Y.B. Int’l
Simowitz, A.D. & Silberman, L.J., L. 235 (2021).
Nonparty Jurisdiction, 55 Vand. J. Sybblis, M.W., Equality Offshore, 63 B.C.
Transnat’l L. 433 (2022). L. Rev. 2667 (2022).
Singer, J.W., Hobbes & Hanging: Personal Symeonides, S.C., Choice of Law in Torts
Jurisdiction v. Choice of Law, 64 Ariz. L. Arising from Infringement of Person-
Rev. 809 (2022). ality Rights, 6 Int’l Bus. L.J. 673 (2022).
Sisak, L., The Closest Connection Prin- Symeonides, S.C., Infringement of Per-
ciple in Conflict of Laws, 105 Pravny sonality Rights via the Internet: Juris-
Obzor 48 (2022). diction and Choice of Law, 5 Lex & F.
Smith, S., “The Rule” and the Constitu- 311 (2022).
tion: Witness Exclusion and the Right Symeonides, S.C., Rome II and
to a Public Trial, 56 J. Marshall L. Rev. Cross-Border Violations of Human
1 (2022). Rights, Infringements of Personality
Soileau, A., A Call for Congressional Ac- Rights, and Other Cross-Border Torts,
tion: Revisiting Universal Jurisdiction 23 Y.B. Priv. Int’l L. 171 (2021–2022).
2023] P R I VAT E I N T E R N AT I O N A L L AW B I B L I O G R A P H Y 2 0 2 2 511

Symposium, The Restatement of the Law Varsava, N., Stare Decisis and
of American Indians, 2022 Wis. L. Rev. Intersystemic Adjudication, 97 Notre
197. Dame L. Rev. 1207 (2022).
Szabados, T., Recognition of a Status Ac- Varyani, N.N., Social Justice & Multi-
quired Abroad: Hungary, 14 Cuadernos Jurisdictional Tax: A Critical Examin-
Derecho Transnat’l 1210 (2022). ation of the Digitization of Commerce,

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajcl/article/71/2/500/7296010 by Tsinghua University user on 13 January 2024

Tarasova, A.E. & Evsikov, M.V., Recog- Multi-Jurisdictional Tax & an Oppor-
nition and Enforcement of Foreign tunity to Correct a Systemic Preference
Judgments on Tax, Customs and Other to Protect Wealth, 50 Cap. U. L. Rev. 91
Administrative Monetary Penalties: A (2022).
Dilemma of Private International and Vastano, J., Choice of Law and Nazi-
Public International Law, 2022 Herald Looted Art Restitution: Cassirer v.
Civ. Proc. 190. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foun-
Thompson, B., Navigating Dual Legal dation, 9 Am. J. Trade & Pol’y 51 (2022).
Systems: Islamic Inheritance Law in Veit, R.-D., Safeguarding Regional
Australia’s Secular Legal Framework, Data Protection Rights on the Global
41 U. Queensl. L.J. 89 (2022). Internet—The European Approach
Tomin, K.R., Germany Takes Action on Under the GDPR, 96 Ius Gentium 445
Corporate Due Diligence in Supply (2022).
Chains: What the United States Can Vieira, L.K., Private International Con-
Learn from International Supply Chain sumer Law in MERCOSUR: The In-
Regulations, 18 Loy. U. Chi. Int’l L. Rev. fluence of European Regulations on
189 (2022). Its Creation, 45 J. Consumer Pol’y 121
True-Frost, C.C., Listening to Dissonance (2022).
at the Intersections of International Vitiello, M., The Supreme Court’s Latest
Human Rights, 43 Mich. J. Int’l L. 361 Attempt at “Clarifying” Personal Juris-
(2022). diction: More Questions than Answers,
Tsang, K.F., Choice of Law in Sino-Japa- 57 Tulsa L. Rev. 395 (2022).
nese Contracts: Some Empirical Obser- Von Hein, J. & Mariottini, C.M., The
vations, 50 Hitotsubashi J.L. & Pol. 9 “Lisbon Guidelines on Privacy”—A
(2022). Path Forward for the Protection of
Tsang, K.F., An Empirical Study on Privacy in Private International and
Choice of Law in China: A Home Run?, Procedural Law, 23 Y.B. Priv. Int’l L.
21 Wash. U. Glob. Stud. L. Rev. 339 103 (2021–2022).
(2022). Vu, T.H. & Do, T.D., Law on Settlement
Tsang, K.F., International Application of Civil Disputes Involving Foreign
of CFAA: Scraping Data or Scraping Elements at the Courts in Vietnam,
Law?, 66 St. Louis U. L.J. 311 (2022). 64 VMOST J. Soc. Sci. & Human. 105
Tsang, K.F. & Lee, J.-A., The Ping-Pong (2022).
Olympics of Antisuit Injunction in Wei, T.S., Transnational Transactions on
FRAND Litigation, 28 Mich. Telecomm. Cryptoasset Exchanges: A Conflict of
& Tech. L. Rev. 305 (2022). Laws Perspective, Singapore J. Legisla-
Turner, S. & Bright, C., From “Due Dili- tive Stud. 384 (2022).
gence” to “Adequate Redress”: Towards Weiner, M.P. & Weller, M.-P., The “Event
Compulsory Human Rights and Envir- Giving Rise to the Damage” Under Art.
onmental Insurance for Companies?, 7 Rome II Regulation in CO2 Reduc-
24 Int’l Comm. L. Rev. 145 (2022). tion Claims, 23 Y.B. Priv. Int’l L. 261
Twardoch, P., Composite Marriage (2021–2022).
Contracts in Polish Private Inter- Weitz, J.S., Home Field Advantage: Is
national Law, 23 Y.B. Priv. Int’l L. 295 “The Supreme Court of Sport” Inde-
(2021–2022). pendent?, 45 Loy. L.A. Int’l & Comp. L.
Twardoch, P. & Koziol, A., 10 Years of Ap- Rev. 227 (2022).
plication of the Polish Act on Private Weller, M., “Mutual Trust”: A Suitable
International Law of 2011, 30 Eur. Rev. Foundation for Private International
Priv. L. 581 (2022). Law in Regional Integration Commu-
Ungerer, J., Nudging in Private Inter- nities and Beyond?, 423 Recueil des
national Law: The Design of Con- Cours 37 (2022).
necting Factors in Light of Behavioural Westkamp, G., In It for the Money? Aca-
Economics, 86 RabelsZ 1 (2022). demic Publishing, Open Access and the
Vanin, O., Assisted Suicide from the Authors’ Claim to Self-Determination
Standpoint of EU Private International in Private International Law, 71 J. Eur.
Law, 18 J. Priv. Int’l L. 186 (2022). & Int’l Intell. Prop. L. 1034 (2022).
512 T H E A M E R I CA N J O U R N A L O F C O M PA R AT I V E L AW [Vol. 71

Williams, R.C., Jurisdiction as Power, 89 Yu, P.K., Contreras, J.L. & Yang, Y., Trans-
U. Chi. L. Rev. 1719 (2022). planting Anti-Suit Injunctions, 71 Am.
Willis, J.E., Sovereignty in Space: Finding U. L. Rev. 1537 (2022).
a Source of Private Property Rights in Zambrano, D.A., Foreign Dictators in U.S.
the Final Frontier, 14 Elon L. Rev. 361 Court, 89 U. Chi. L. Rev. 157 (2022).
(2022). Zhang, B. & Shen, W., When International

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajcl/article/71/2/500/7296010 by Tsinghua University user on 13 January 2024

Wolf, L.E. et al., Addressing Choice of Commercial Arbitration Meets China’s
Law Challenges in Multi-State Pre- Sanction Laws: Living Together but Re-
cision Medicine Research: Experts’ maining Apart?, 13 J. Int’l Disp. Settle-
Assessment of Key Factors, 9 J.L. & ment 665 (2022).
Biosci. 1 (2022). Zhang, Z., Globalized Cross-Border In-
Worthington, D.G. & Merric, M., Which solvency Law: The Roles Played by
Trust Situs Is Best in 2022? An Up- China, Eur. Bus. Org. L. Rev. 735
dated Ranking Matrix, 161 Trs. & Ests. (2022).
44 (2022). Zhou, Y., Dealing with U.S.–China Cul-
Wysocka-Bar, A., Same-Sex Parent- tural Conflicts in FCPA Enforcement: A
hood in a Cross-Border Landscape in Pluralistic Conflict-of-Laws Approach,
Pancharevo, 23 Y.B. Priv. Int’l L. 333 20 U.N.H. L. Rev. 251 (2021–2022).
(2021–2022). Zubrzycki, C.M., The Abortion Interoper-
Yagihashi, H., International Catalyst for ability Trap, 132 Yale L.J.F. 197 (2022).
Change—Hybrid Litigation Under 28 Zupruk, B., The Legality and Ramifica-
U.S.C. § 1782, 41 Rev. Litig. 163 (2022). tions of High Seas Seizures of Foreign
Young, K.G., Human Rights Originalism, Merchant Vessels for Violating U.S.
110 Geo. L.J. 1097 (2022). Sanctions, 46 Tul. Mar. L.J. 349 (2022).