EBOOK Scanned PDF 978 0176570163 Sociocultural Anthropology A Problem Based Approach 3Rd Edition Download Full Chapter PDF Kindle
EBOOK Scanned PDF 978 0176570163 Sociocultural Anthropology A Problem Based Approach 3Rd Edition Download Full Chapter PDF Kindle
SOCIOCULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY: A
PROBLEM-BASED APPROACH 3rd
Edition
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmass.com/product/scanned-pdf-978-0176570163-sociocultural-anthropol
ogy-a-problem-based-approach-3rd-edition/
A Pro- em-Base . . . . . . Approac
THIRD CANADIAN EDITION
Richard H. Robbins
State University of New York at Plattsburgh
Maggie Cummings
University of Toronto
Karen McGarry
McMaster University
NELSON
-EDUCATION
NELSON
EDUCATION
COPYRIGHT© 2017, 2014 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of Library and Archives Canada
by Nelson Education Ltd. this work covered by the copyright Cataloguing in Publication Data
herein may be reproduced, Robbins, Richard H. (Richard
Adapted from ANTHRO, First Edition transcribed, or used in any form or
by Richard H. Robbins, published by Howard), 1940-
by any means-graphic, electronic, [Cultural anthropology]
Cengage Learning. Copyright ©2012 or mechanical, including
by Wadsworth Learning. Sociocultural anthropology : a
photocopying, recording, taping, problem-based approach I Richard
Printed and bound in Canada. Web distribution, or information H. Robbins, State University of
1 2 3 4 19 18 17 16 storage and retrieval systems- New York at Plattsburgh, Maggie
without the written permission of Cummings, University of Toronto,
For more information contact the publisher. Karen McGarry, McMaster
Nelson Education Ltd., University.- Third Canadian
1120 Birchmount Road, Toronto, For permission to use material
from this text or product, submit edition.
Ontario, M 1K 5G4. Or you can visit
our Internet site at all requests online at Previous editions published under
http://www.nelson.com www.cengage.com/permissions. title: Cultural anthropology.
Further questions about Includes bibliographical references
permissions can be emailed to and index.
[email protected] ISBN 978-0-17-657016-3
Every effort has been made to (paperback)
trace ownership of all copyrighted 1. Ethnology-Textbooks.
material and to secure permission I. Cummings, Maggie, 1974-, author
from copyright holders. In the II. McGarry, Karen Ann, 1972-,
event of any question arising as to author Ill. Title: Cultural
the use of any material, we w ill be anthropology
pleased to make the necessary
corrections in future printings. GN316.R62 2016 306
C20 15-906184-9
ISBN-13: 978-0-17-657016-3
ISBN-1 0: 0-17-657016-0
The publisher of Sociocultural Anthropology: A Problem-Based Approach, Third Canadian Edition, hopes that the
inquiry-based approach of this book guides students as they develop an inquisitiveness and openness to cultural
diversity. The cover image is an untitled work from 1993 by Max Johnston, an artist whose work is primarily abstract art
and who lives in Toronto.
A Pro_ em-Base- Approac
THIRD CANADIAN EDITION
Although all humans that we know about are
capable of producing accurate sketches of localities
and regions with which they are familiar, cartogra-
phy (the craft of mapmaking as we know it today)
had its beginnings in 16th-century Europe, and its
subsequent development is related to the expan-
sion of Europeans to all parts of the globe. From
the beginning, there have been two problems with
MERCATOR
maps: the technical one of how to depict on a two-
dimensional, flat surface a three-dimensional spher-
ical object, and the cultural one of whose world
view maps reflect. In fact, the two issues are insepa-
rable, for the particular projection one uses inevita-
bly makes a statement about how one views one's
own people and their place in the world. Indeed,
maps often shape our perceptions of reality as much
as they reflect them.
In cartography, a projection refers to the system
of intersecting lines (of longitude and latitude) by
which part or all of the globe is represented on a
MOLLW£10E
flat surface. There are more than a hundred different
projections in use today, ranging from polar perspec-
tives to interrupted "butterflies" to rectangles to
heart shapes. Each projection causes distortion in
size, shape, or distance in some way or another. A
map that correctly shows the shape of a landmass
will of necessity misrepresent the size. A map that
is accurate along the equator will be deceptive at
the poles.
Perhaps no projection has had more influence
on the way we see the world than that of Gerhar-
VAN E& GRINTIN
dus Mercator, who devised his map in 1569 as a
navigational aid for mariners. So well suited was
Mercator's map for this purpose that it continues
to be used for navigational charts today. At the same
--- --
time, the Mercator projection became a standard for . ~:.,.._
IV NEL
The Van der Grinten Projection (1904) was a
compromise aimed at minimizing both the distor-
tions of size in the Mercator and the distortions of
shape in equal-area maps such as the Mollweide.
Although an improvement, the Van der Grinten still
emphasizes the lands of the northern hemisphere at
the expense of the southern. For example, it shows
Canada and the former Soviet Union at more than
never intended. Although an accurate navigational twice their actual size.
tool, the Mercator projection greatly exaggerates The Robinson Projection, which was adopted
the size of landmasses in higher latitudes, giving by the National Geographic Society in 1988 to
about two-thirds of the map's surface to the north- replace the Van der Grinten, is one of the best
ern hemisphere. Thus, the lands occupied by Euro- compromises to date between the distortions of size
peans and European descendants appear far larger and those of shape. Although an improvement over
than those of other people. For example, North the Vander Grinten, the Robinson Projection still
America (19 million square kilometres) appears depicts lands in the northern latitudes as propor-
almost twice the size of Africa (30 million square tionally larger than those of the southern, that is,
kilometres), while Europe is shown as equal in size the Third World. And like European maps before
to South America, which actually has nearly twice it, the Robinson Projection places Europe at the
the landmass ofEurope. centre with the Atlantic Ocean and the Americas
A map developed in 1805 by Karl B. Mollweide to the left, thus emphasizing the cultural connec-
was one of the earlier equal-area projections of the tion between Europe and North America, while
world. Equal-area projections portray landmasses in neglecting the geographic closeness of northwest-
correct relative size, but as a result, they distort the ern North America to northeastern Asia.
shapes of continents more than other projections. Each of the four maps on the following pages
They most often compress and warp lands in the conveys quite a different cultural message. Included
higher latitudes and vertically stretch landmasses among them are the Peters Projection, an equal-
close to the equator. Other equal-area projec- area map that has been adopted as the official map
tions include the Lambert Cylindrical Equal-Area of UNESCO (the United Nations Educational,
Projection (1772), the Hammer Equal-Area Projec- Scientific, and Cultural Organization), and a Japa-
tion (1892), and the Eckert Equal-Area Projection nese map that shows us how the world looks from
(1906). the other side.
'<:)0
•
0 0
o,p
J '8
NAYABASTI 0
0
0
"'o
0
.
000
0 .Oo
LONGOT ' ~0
0
g 0
0
NUE
•
0 0
~
00 0
0 o0 oo o0 0 !\,
0 0 \ • 0
0
0
0 0
0
p 00
0
0 TELEFO LM IN 0
0
og
ABELAM 0
~0 00
• 0"1f•
0
.. 0~ KWARA'A E
oo
ooo
0
0
0
0 0
U• 0
0
0
00 0
0
Oo
0
j
0
o.
KAZAKHSTAN
KIRGHIZSTAN
MONGOLIA
••"''-'
KOREA
PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC
OF CHINA
IRAQ IRAN
BHUTAN
NEPAL
I'
BYA
EGYPT
..• •
(')
• 0
INOlA
SAUOI OMAN
ARABIA
BANGLA-
EMIRATES DESH
:HAD NORTH
SUDAN THAILAND
J VIETNAM PHILIPPINES
CAMBODI~
)~·~
NIGERIA •
• 0
•
.. •
BRUNEI ••
•
CAMEROON PAPUA
~ SINGAPORE NEW
GABON GUINEA
CONGO
RWANDA
BURUNDI •
DEMOCRATIC •• •
•
REPUBLIC OF
~ONG D
0 •
•• ••
MALAWI • • 0 0
.,g •
• •
••• ••
0
0
GOLA 0 • ••
0
•
••
ZAMBIA
\):
• • • ••
MADAGASCAR
'•
•'
IBIA •
••
•
•
-++ ZIMBAB E •
• •
•
'•
AUSTRALIA
MOZAMBIQUE
SWAZILAND
LESOTHO f)
SOUTH
AFRICA
NEW ZEALAND
ANTARCTICA
GREENLAND
\J 0
[J ' I
0
•
GJ
p
<>
•
• •
NORWAY
ICELAND
RUSSIA
~·
•
KAZAKHSTAN
KIRGHIZSTAN
MON GOLIA
•
· ~
• PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC
OF CHINA
MOROCCO
ALG ERIA •
WESTERN - -+ EGYPT
INDIA
'
••
SAftARA
UNITED • •••
MAll ARAB
EMIRATES
.
•
SENEGAL '::""""0 NIGER CHAD
GAMBIA ·=:;:-1~~
DESH
• ..•'
GUI~EA-BI SSAU
GUINEA - - - - - 1
~~\'( THAILAND
CAMBODJA •
..
~
MADAGASCAR
0 0
BOTSWANA
•
0
v (>
•
•
•
••
••
•
• " . _,_.,_ ANTARCTI CA
JAPANESE MAP
Not all maps place Europe at the centre of the world. This map, besides reflecting the importance the
Japanese attach to themselves in the world, has the virtue of showing the geographic proximity of North
America to Asia a fact easily overlooked when maps place Europe at their centre.
UNITED
RUSSIA STATES
'
CANADA
r'.
.....
•
-·
UNITED STATES
.•.
• .... C>
..- .
• FRENCH GUIANA
•
COSTA RICA
iiiiiiiiiiii;;;::=. PANAM~------l
•
• '
GUYANA
ECUADOR SURINAM
BRAZIL
. 0
••
CHAPTER 1
CONSTRUCTING REALITIES 92
CHAPTER 5
XII NEL
PU TT ING T HE WORLD IN An Anthropologist Looks at a
"Happy Mea l" 24
PERS PECT IVE IV
QUESTION 1.5: How Can an
PREFAC E XIX
Anthropolog ical Perspective Be Used
A BOU T THE A UT HORS XXIX Outside Academia? 26
What Can You Do w ith a B.A. in
Anthropology? 26
Appl ied Anthropology 27
CHAPTER 1
Ind igenous Issues 27
CULTURE AND MEANING 2 Lega l Anthropology 29
Pol it ical Ecology 30
PROBLEM 1: How can people beg in to Medica l Anthropology 30
understand beliefs and behaviours that are
Corporate Ethnography 32
d ifferent from their own? 3
CONCLUSIONS 34
INTRODUCTION 3
CRITICAL THINKING QUESTIONS 35
The World Behind Everyday
Appearances 3
A Mu lt i-faceted Discip line 4 CHAPTER 2
QUESTION 1.1: Why Do Human Beings
DOING FIELDWORK
Differ in Their Beliefs and Behaviours? 9
QUESTION 1.2: Is It Possib le to See the
IN SOCIOCULTURAL
World Through the Eyes o f Others? 12 ANTHROPOLOGY 36
How Do People Explain the
Bel ief s and Behaviours o f Others? 12 PROBLEM 2: How do sociocu ltural
The Ethnocentric Fal lacy and the anthropolog ists learn about culture? 37
Relat iv ist Fa llacy 13 INTRODUCTION 37
Virg inity Test ing in Turkey and
Canniba lism Among the Wari' 14 QUESTION 2.1: How Did Ethnographic
Objectivity and Mora lity 16 Fieldwork Develop During the Formative
Years of Anthropology? 39
QUESTION 1.3: How Can the Mean ings
Anthropology from an Armchair 39
That Others Find in Experience Be
Ethnographic Fieldwork 41
Interpreted and Described? 18
Deciphering the Balinese QUESTION 2.2: How Has Fieldwork
Cockfi ght 19 Changed over the Past Century? 43
Chang ing Notions of Fieldwork 43
QUESTION 1.4: What Can Learning About
Other Peop les Tell Anthropo log ists QUESTION 2.3: What Are Some of the
About Their Own Societ ies? 22 Cha llenges o f Conduct ing Fie ldwork? 47
A Bal inese Anthropologist Stud ies The Embarrassed Anthropologist 47
Canad ian Hockey 22 Con f ront ing Witchcraft in Mexico 48
NEL X III
QUESTION 2.4: What Are the QUESTION 3.2: How Can We Exp lain
Respons ib il it ies of Anthropo log ists Toward the Vast Inequality Between the Rich
the Peop le They Work W ith? What Does It and the Poor? 71
Mean to "Act Ethica lly" as an The Brit ish in Ind ia 74
Anthropolog ist? 50 Cotton, Slavery, and the Trail of
QUESTION 2.5: How Do Anthropolog ists Tears 75
Represent the Peop le They Study and Progress for Whom? 78
Work W ith? Why Is Representation an QUESTION 3.3: How Do Inequality,
Important Issue W ith in Anthropo logy? 51 Econom ic Development, and Cu ltura l
Representation and Cu lture 51 Divers ity Re late to One Another? 78
CONCLUSIONS 55 The Case of Brazi I 80
Do Progress and Deve lopment
CRITICAL THINKING QUESTIONS 56 Inevitably Lead to Inequality? 81
QUESTION 3.4: Have Progress and
CHAPTER 3 Development Improved Human Hea lth? 82
Illness and Inequality 82
THE MEANING OF The Meaning of Illness 83
PROGRESS AND QUESTION 3.5: How Can We App ly a
DEVELOPMENT 58 Crit ica l Anthropolog ica l Understand ing of
Progress and Deve lopment Outside the
PROBLEM 3: How do we exp lain the Academy? 86
transformation of human societies over the Anthropolog ists in Development 86
past 10,000 years from sma ll-sca le, nomad ic
CONCLUSIONS 90
bands of foragers to large-sca le, urban-
industrial states? 59 CRITICAL THINKING QUESTIONS 91
INTRODUCTION 59
What Do We Mean When We Ta lk
CHAPTER 4
About Progress? 59
QUESTION 3.1: How and Why Did CONSTRUCT! NG
Forag ing Societies Switch to Sedentary REALITIES 92
Ag ricu ltu re? 60
Does the Idea of Progress He lp Us PROBLEM 4: Why do peop le be lieve d ifferent
Understand the Sh ift from Forag ing th ings, and why are they so certa in that their
to Sedentary Agricu lture? 62 v iew of the world is correct and that other
Evolutionary Exp lanations for Cu lture v iews are wrong? 93
Change: Lewis Henry Morgan and
INTRODUCTION 93
Les lie White 63
What Are the Shortcomings of The Centra l Question 93
These Theories of Progress? 65 QUESTION 4.1: How Does the Use of
Life Among Foragers: The Hadza Metaphor Affect the Meanings Peop le
and Ju/'hoans i 65 Ass ign to Experience? 95
The Transition to Agricu lture 68 Borrowing Meaning w ith Metaphors 95
Industria l Agricu lture: Producing Kwakwaka'wakw Metaphors of
Potato Ca lories 70 Hunger 98
NEL CONTENTS XV
CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS 185
ID ENTITIES 160
CHAPTER 7
PROBLEM 6: How do peop le determ ine who
they are, and how do they commun icate who SOCIAL HIERARCHIES 186
they think they are to others? 161
PROBLEM 7: Why are modern societies
INTRODUCTION 161 characterized by social, polit ica l, and
QUESTION 6.1: How Is Identity, and econom ic inequa lit ies? How are certa in
One's Sense of Self, Learned? 162 gender, c lass, rac ial, and other identit ies
Learn ing Identit ies 162 priv ileged or marg ina lized in various
social contexts? 187
Learn ing to Be long 163
QUESTION 6.2: How Does the INTRODUCTION 187
Concept o f Personhood Vary from The Rationa le for Social Inequa lity 187
Society to Society? 167 QUESTION 7.1: How Do Societies Use
The Importance of Se lf 167 Class and Caste to Rank Peop le in
The Egocentric Se lf and the Social Hierarchies? 189
Sociocentric Self 168 Class as a Form of Social
Personhood in Japan 170 Hierarchy 189
QUESTION 6.3: How Do Societies Caste as a Form of Social
Distingu ish Indiv idua ls from One Stratif ication 190
Another? 171 QUESTION 7.2: How Do Peop le Come to
Accept Social Hierarchies as Natura l? 192
QUESTION 6.4: How Do Societies Mark
Changes in Identity? 173 Race as a Form of Social
Stratif ication 192
The Transit ion to Adu lthood 173
Constructing the Ideology of
QUESTION 6.5: How Do Indiv idua ls Racism 192
Communicate Their Identit ies to One Class, Race, and the Social
Another? 174 Construction of "Intelligence" 196
Ritua ls of Gift Giv ing and Hospita lity 175
QUESTION 7.3: How Is Gender a
Gifts and Commod it ies 177 Form of Soc ial Hierarchy? 200
Gift Giv ing and the Christian
Constructing Ma le and Fema le 200
Ce lebration of Christmas in North
Constructing Stratification by
America 178
Gender 201
QUESTION 6.6: How Do Peop le Gender Stratifi cation and the
Form Identit ies Through Collective Priv ileg ing of Hegemon ic
Strugg les? 180 Mascu linit ies 202
The Meaning of "Ind igenous" 180 Gender Stratifi cation and the
Social Movements 181 Feminization of Poverty 204
Pa lestinian Refugees 182 Body Image and Gender
Conflict W ith in Collective Identity: Hierarch ies 204
Telefolm in and Land in Papua New Language, Gender, and Racial
Gu inea 182 Hierarch ies 206
NEL XIX
around them. The text facilitates this by encour- the nine chapters focuses on a specific problem of
aging students to analyze and critique many basic anthropological as well as general concern:
assumptions that they have brought with them to • How can people begin to understand beliefs and
the course. For example, many of us are taught to behaviours that are different from their own?
think about our sense of identity, which encom- • How do sociocultural anthropologists learn
passes gender, class, race, ethnicity, nationality, and about culture?
family, as natural, biological, or fixed as something • How do we explain the transformation of
we are born with. In this text, however, we place human societies over the past 10,000 years
particular emphasis on the culturally constructed from small-scale, nomadic bands of hunters and
nature of our world: on the idea that many identi- gatherers to large-scale, urban-industrial states?
ties, as well as beliefs and practices, that we view as • Why do people believe different things, and
natural are both learned and the consequences of why are they so certain that their view of the
cultural differences. world is correct and that others are wrong?
We thus adopt a "problem-based approach" • What do we need to know before we can
to the study of anthropology. Richard Robbins understand the dynamics of family life in other
wrote the original edition of Cultural Anthropol- societies?
ogy: A Problem-Based Approach in the hope that such • How do people determine who they are, and
an approach would foster a classroom culture that, how do they communicate who they think
regardless of class size and instructional technique, they are to others?
would actively involve students in the learning process, • Why are modern societies characterized by
promote critical thinking, and impress on students that social, political, and economic inequalities?
they, along with the other people and cultures of the How are certain gender, class, racial, and other
world, are cultural animals worthy of study. identities privileged or marginalized in various
Each chapter is organized around an intellec- social contexts?
tual "problem" and then subdivided into a series of • What are the economic and cultural effects
questions that address the problem from an anthro- of globalization, and what is the relationship
pological perspective. Most sections of each chap- between globalization, the nation-state, and
ter contain short exercises that encourage students national identity?
to apply the knowledge and skills they have learned • How do societies give meaning to and justify
to foster a sense of reflexivity about their own various forms of conflict resolution, both
behaviours and beliefs. Each chapter ends with a peaceful and violent?
discussion of the ways in which a problem-based
These problems have no definitive solutions, yet
approach and anthropological perspective can be
they drive much intellectual inquiry. Each problem/
put to use outside academia. Ultimately, we hope
chapter is broken down into a series of specific ques-
that after reading this text, students will appre-
tions, each of which can be "answered" by focusing
ciate that culture, as the way that human beings
on the ethnographic and theoretical contributions of
make their lives meaningful, is fluid, dynamic,
anthropologists. Such questions include the following:
contradictory, and subject to critique. Moreover,
we hope that students who read this book will • Is it possible to see the world through the eyes
understand why and how anthropology matters of others?
for anyone who wants to understand, and perhaps • How do people come to accept social
make a difference in, the contemporary world. hierarchies as natural?
The material in this text is organized by prob- • What are the characteristics of peaceful
lems and questions rather than by topics. Each of societies?
XX PREFACE NEL
TOPIC AND QUESTION CORRESPONDENCE
Aboriginal and Indigenous Question 3.2; Question 3.3; Question 3.4; Question 3.5; Question 4.1; Question 4.2; Question 4.3; Question 4.4;
Peoples Question 4.5; Question 6.1; Question 6.6; Question 8.3; Question 8.4; Question 9.1; Question 9.2; Question 9.3
Applied Anthropology Question 1.5; Question 3.5; Question 5.6; Question 7.6;
Question 9.6; Chapter 9(Conclusions)
Caste Question 7.1
Colonialism Question 3.2; Question 3.3; Question 3.4; Question 4.4; Question 4.5; Question 6.2; Question 6.6; Question 8.2;
Question 8.3; Question 8.4; Question 8.5; Question 9.3; Question 9.4
Conflict Chapter 9
Corporations Question 8.1; Question 8.2
Cultural Relativism Question 1.2
Culture Change Chapter 3
Culture Concept Chapter 1
Ecology Question 1.5; Question 3.3; Question 3.5; Question 8.2; Question 8.3
Economic Anthropology Chapter 3; Chapter 7; Chapter 8
Education Question 6.1; Question 8.3
Ethnocentrism Question 1.2
Family Organization Chapter 5
Feminist Anthropology Question 4.5; Question 5.1; Question 6.4; Question 9.3
Fieldwork Chapter 2
Food Production Question 2.3; Question 3.1; Question 8.2
Foragers Question 3.1; Question 9.2
Gender Chapter 7; Question 6.1; Question 7.3; Question 9.3
Gift Giving Question 5.3; Question 6.5
Globalization Chapter 8; Question 3.2; Question 3.3
Human Rights Question 1.2; Question 7.6
Identity Chapter 6
Industrialization Question 3.2; Question 3.3
Inequality Chapter 7; Question 7.1; Question 7.2; Question 7.3; Question 7.4; Question 7.5; Question 7.6
International Development Question 3.3; Question 3.5; Question 5.6; Question 6.6
Kinship Chapter 5
Language and Culture Question 1.3; Question 4.1; Question 6.3; Question 7.3; Question 9.5
Law and Anthropology Question 1.5
Marriage Chapter 5
(Continued)
Medical Anthropology Question 1.5; Question 3.4; Question 5.6; Question 7.6
Nation-State Chapter 8; Question 9.4
Neoliberalism Chapter 8
Peasants Question 2.5; Question 3.1; Question 3.3; Chapter 5
Political Ecology Question 1.5
Political Organization and Control Chapter 7; Question 7.5; Question 9.2; Question 9.3; Question 9.4
Race and Racism Question 7.2; Question 7.4
Religion/World View Chapter 4; Question 1.1; Question 1.2; Question 6.5; Question 9.1
Ritual Question 1.3; Question 1.4; Question 4.2; Question 4.3; Question 6.4; Question 6.5; Question 6.6
Sexual Stratification Question 5.1; Question 5.2; Question 5.3; Question 9.3
Sexuality Question 5.3; Question 5.5; Question 5.6; Question 7.3
Social Stratification Chapter 7
Status and Rank Chapter 7; Question 3.1; Question 3.2; Question 3.3; Question 9.1
Subsistence Techniques Question 3.1; Question 3.2
Symbolism Question 1.1; Question 1.3; Question 1.4; Question 4.1; Question 4.2; Question 4.3; Question 6.4; Question 6.5
Systems of Exchange Question 6.5
Tourism Question 2.5; Question 8.4
Although the problems and questions included anthropologist." These exercises are interspersed
in the text are not exhaustive, those that we have throughout the text and can be used in various
selected are central to the concerns of the discipline ways by students and instructors. They might
and include the topics and issues typically covered in serve as discussion questions in lectures, tutori-
an introductory sociocultural anthropology class. We als, or online discussion posts, or they could be
have chosen problems and questions that we hope will used as the basis for group work. They could also
capture students' imaginations and whet their appe- be treated as informal writing assignments, with
tite for further study in the discipline. The Topic and students preparing brief reading responses based
Question Correspondence chart, which links topics to on the exercises, which would then be used as a
questions considered in the text, can be used in guid- starting point for classroom discussion. However
ing discussion and in course planning. they are used, the exercises are designed to give
A key pedagogical feature of this text is the first-year students a chance to engage in intellec-
inclusion of exercises that give students the oppor- tual debate and to highlight the real-world impli-
tunity to apply what they have read, to think about cations of what they have learned.
the implications of the material for their own In addition to the exercises, each chapter
lives, and to think about various problems "like an concludes with several critical thinking questions.
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.