Baba 2015
Baba 2015
Hideomi Kawachi
Denso Corporation
CITATION: Baba, H., Kawasaki, K., and Kawachi, H., "Battery Heating System for Electric Vehicles," SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-0248,
2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-0248.
Copyright © 2015 SAE International
Abstract system. Stuart et al. [6] tested battery heating performance using AC
power source. These possibilities are divided into two main
We have developed Li-ion battery heating system which is direct
categories which are indirect heating methods by using air or liquid,
resistance heating for hybrid electric vehicles (HEV), plug-in hybrid
etc. and direct heating methods such as AC heating, etc. Ji et al. [7]
vehicles (PHEV) and electric vehicles (EV) by use of an inverter and
introduced four criteria for battery heating strategy evaluation:
a motor. One relay is added between a positive terminal of Li-ion
(1) electrical energy consumption in terms of battery capacity, or
battery and one-phase (e.g. U-phase) of a three-phase motor. When
equivalently, in terms of driving range of EVs, (2) heating time,
additional relay is turned on, the motor coils, IGBTs (Insulated-gate
(3) effect of heating operation on system durability including battery
bipolar transistor) and diodes in the inverter and a smoothing
cycle life and (4) system cost. The best battery heating strategy is low
capacitor for the inverter constitute buck-boost DC to DC converter.
energy consumption, short heating time, long system durability and
IGBTs are controlled to repeat charging and discharging between the
low system cost. In general, the energy consumption and the heating
battery and the smoothing capacitor. We made a system prototype and
speed of air heating are worse than liquid heating but the system
examined battery heating capability. And also we optimized charging
endurance and the system cost of air heating is more reasonable than
and discharging frequency from impedance and current to improve
liquid heating. On the other hand, the heating performance of the
heat generation. This method can increase battery temperature from
direct heating is higher than the indirect heating due to low heat loss
−20 degrees C to 0 degrees C in 5 minutes and can extend EV driving
(i.e. liquid heating and air heating system have heat exchange loss.).
range. Additionally the system can be installed into all HEV, PHEV
and EV.
In this paper, we focused on direct resistance heating and we have
developed a battery heating system which can achieve low energy
Introduction consumption, high performance, low effect on system durability and
low system cost.
Electric vehicles (EVs) use Lithium-ion (Li-ion) battery for the high
voltage battery due to high energy density compared to the other
batteries such as Lead-acid battery or Nickel-metal Hydride battery. Battery Heating System Concept
[1] However the power output of Li-ion battery decreases at
extremely low temperature (e.g. −20 degrees C) because of high System Configuration
internal resistance. That is why EV driving range drops at −20 Standard EVs consist mainly of high voltage battery, inverter and
degrees C. One of countermeasures against short driving range in three-phase motor which are shown in Figure 1. The battery heating
cold weather is battery heating that increases battery temperature to system utilizes the motor and the inverter to drive EV. This system
more than 0 degrees C at which EVs can recover the power output. needs to add only system main relay 2 (SMR2) which is connected
There are a lot of different possibilities to warm high voltage batteries between positive terminal of the battery and one-phase of the motor
for EVs. Rao et al. [1] put together battery heating methods which (U-phase in Figure 1). When SMR2 is turned on, the motor coils,
utilize air or liquid which is heated by a heater and a heat exchanger. IGBTs (Insulated-gate bipolar transistor) and diodes in the inverter
Steffke et al. [2] evaluated air-warmed battery system with the and a smoothing capacitor for the inverter constitute buck-boost DC
vehicle HVAC system. Javani et al. [3] simulated battery thermal to DC converter. An electric current flows in the battery by means of
management system by use of PCMs (Phase Change Materials). repeating charging and discharging between the battery and the
Zhang et al. [4] used PCS (Phase Change Slurry) for battery cooling smoothing capacitor and then the battery is heated up directly.
and heating. Cosley et al. [5] reported AC resistance heater pad Additionally, an electric current flows in the motor coils, the IGBTs
Downloaded from SAE International by Univ of California Berkeley, Sunday, July 29, 2018
controlled by commercially available controller to repeat charging Additionally, cell impedance was measured at −20 degrees C and
and discharging between the battery and the smoothing capacitor. 25 degrees C, and then heat generation in the battery from 40Hz to
Figure 7 shows test bench for battery heating. The battery was located 1kHz was calculated. As a result, the most effective charging and
in a chamber which could control air temperature from −40 degrees C discharging frequency was determined.
to 100 degrees C. And also, the battery was covered with Styrofoam
to prevent the battery from air flow which could remove the heat Table 2. Test Conditions for Charging and Discharging Frequency Determination
from the surface of the battery. Conventional motor and inverter for
hybrid electric vehicle were chosen as shown in Figure 7.
Thermocouple (T-type) to monitor battery cell temperature (TB) was
put on the side surface of the cell which was located in the center of
the battery pack. Voltage meters for the battery voltage (VB) and the
smoothing capacitor voltage (VC) and current sensor to record the
battery current (AB) were installed in this test bench. The battery cell
specifications are shown in Table 1. We made a battery pack which
had seven cells (Capacity: 9.0Ah, Internal resistance (1second):
1.5mΩ) in series.
Result
Measurement values of the impedance at −20 degrees C and
25 degrees C are shown in Figure 8. Impedance at −20 degrees C at
10Hz or less was much higher than impedance at 25 degrees C. That
is why battery current cannot flow at extremely low temperature
because of big cell voltage drop which can immediately reach the
minimum voltage of the cell (i.e. 2.5V (SOC=0%)). And also,
impedance varied depending on SOC. Impedance at SOC60% was
exactly similar to the impedance at SOC80% but when SOC dropped
down to 40%, the impedance increased compared with SOC60% and
SOC80%. However the impedance decreased at from 50Hz to 1kHz
even at −20 degrees C. Therefore a big electric current can be applied
in this range.
discharging period was too short. Therefore battery current at 1kHz biggest heat generation and ensured the minimum voltage during
was 36A (peak to peak) and 17Arms which was far smaller than charging and discharging over 17.5V (SOC=0%). Heat generation
battery current at 50Hz. Heat generation can be calculated by was 190W per 7cells at 50Hz. That means 2.7kW per 100cells.
Equation (1).
(1)
Figure 11. Battery Heat Generation, Battery Current (Root Mean Square) and
Minimum Voltage during Charging and Discharging Versus Charging and
Discharging Frequency at SOC80%
Figure 10. Battery Voltage, Capacitor Voltage, Battery Current and Control
Signal on The Upper Side of V-phase at −20 Degrees C (SOC=80%, Charging
and Discharging Frequency=1kHz)
Experimental Condition
Experimental conditions are shown in Table 3. Ambient air
temperature in the chamber and initial battery temperature were set
at −20 degrees C. Initial state of charge of the battery was 80%.
Carrier frequency was fixed at 10kHz (Duty ratio: 90%). Charging
and discharging frequency was settle at 50Hz which was determined
in previous section. Thermocouple for battery temperature was put
on the side of the center cell shown in Figure 7. And also battery
power output with battery heating and without battery heating at
−20 degrees C was measured by use of regeneration charge-
discharge power supply.
Figure 13. Battery Heat Generation, Battery Current (Root Mean Square) and Table 3. Test Conditions for Battery Heating Performance
Minimum Voltage during Charging and Discharging Versus Charging and
Discharging Frequency at SOC60%
Result
Battery temperature and air temperature in chamber during battery
heating are shown in Figure 16. The battery temperature started to
increase immediately after battery current flowed in the battery. It
took 5 minutes from −20 degree C to 0 degree C at which battery
power output could be delivered enough to drive an EV. Figure 17
explains comparison between battery power output after battery
heating and battery power output before battery heating. Battery
heating could improve battery power output from 2.7kW (Battery
Figure 14. Battery Voltage, Capacitor Voltage, Battery Current and Control
temperature: −20 degrees C) to 10.8kW (Battery temperature:
Signal on The Upper Side of V-phase at −20 Degrees C (SOC=40%, Charging
0 degrees C) due to internal resistance decrease. Internal
and Discharging Frequency=70Hz)
resistance at −20 degrees C is 14.7mΩ and 4.4mΩ at 0 degrees C.
That is why battery current after battery heating can flow far
bigger than before battery heating and the power output of heated
up battery become 4 times as much as frozen battery.
Figure 15. Battery Heat Generation, Battery Current (Root Mean Square) and
Minimum Voltage during Charging and Discharging Versus Charging and
Discharging Frequency at SOC40%
Result
EV driving range and cell voltage with battery heating and without
battery heating are shown in Figure 19. The battery voltage without
battery warming reached SOC 30% as soon as the vehicle started
because of high internal resistance. Therefore it is impossible to
operate by using electricity. On the other hand, Prius PHEV with
warmed battery had been driving for 27 minutes by using only battery
energy until battery SOC reached 30%. As a result, calculation value
of EV driving range increased up to 13km by battery heating.
Figure 17. Comparison between Battery Power Output after Battery Heating
and Battery Power Output before Battery Heating
Simulation Method
The effect on EV driving range was simulated by using MATLAB.
Figure 19. EV Driving Range and Cell Voltage with and without Battery Heating
Simulation conditions are shown in Table 4. Ambient air temperature
was −20 degrees C and initial SOC was set at 80% same as battery
heating test. Simulated vehicle was Toyota Prius PHEV whose EV Summary/Conclusions
driving range at 25 degrees C was 22.8km which was calculated at We have developed a direct battery heating system using motor and
LA#4 shown in Figure 18. Figure 18 shows vehicle speed and battery inverter. The system can increase battery temperature at extremely
current at LA#4 mode. The battery current was calculated by use of low temperature by repeating charging and discharging between the
Prius PHEV specifications such as vehicle weight and battery voltage, battery and the smoothing capacitor for the inverter. Additional part
etc. Each cell voltage was simulated and then EV driving range was for the battery heating system is just one relay. Charging and
compared between with battery heating and without battery heating. discharging frequency were optimized from impedance and current to
Battery SOC range was settled from 30% to 80% in this simulation. improve heat generation. As a consequence, the battery is heated up
This implies that vehicle stops driving when SOC gets to 30%. from −20 degrees C to 0 degrees C in 5 minutes and EV driving
range can be extended by 13km (Toyota Prius PHEV, LA#4)
Table 4. Simulation Conditions compared to without battery heating. Furthermore, this system is
capable of heating up transmission oil and coolant for power
electronics components from −20 degrees C because the motor coils
are warmed as well by high current. Thus energy consumption to
warm the oil and the coolant after vehicle start-up will be saved by
battery heating.
Contact Information
Hiroyasu Baba
Project Assistant Manager - Battery Thermal Management / Battery
Energy Management
Nippon Soken, Inc.
[email protected]
Koji Kawasaki
Figure 21. Microphone Position General Manager - Hybrid Electric Vehicle System / Robotics
Nippon Soken, Inc.
[email protected]
Hideomi Kawachi
Project Director - Electric Vehicle System
Denso Corporation
[email protected]
Definitions/Abbreviations
HEV - Hybrid Electric Vehicle
PHEV - Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle
Figure 22. A-weighted Sound Pressure Level Comparison between EV - Electric Vehicle
Background Noise and Battery Heating Noise IGBT - Insulated-gate bipolar transistor
HVAC - Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning
References
PCM - Phase Change Material
1. Rao, Z. and Wang, S., “A review of power battery thermal
energy management,” Renewable and Sustainalble Energy PCS - Phase Change Slurry
Reviews 15 (2011) 4554-4571, 2011 DC - Direct Current
2. Steffke, K., Spigno, C., and Bezzina, C., “Li-ion Air-Cooled AC - Alternating Current
Battery System Interactions With the Vehicle HVAC System,” SAE
SMR - System Main Relay
Technical Paper 2013-01-0242, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-0242.
3. Javani, N., Dincer, I., Naterer, G.F. and Yilbas, B.S., “Heat SOC - State of Charge
transfer and thermal management with PCMs in a Li-ion battery HB (W) - Heat Generation in Battery
cell for electric vehicles,” International Journal of Heat and T (second) - Cycle Length
Mass Transfer 72 (2014) 690-703, 2014
IB (A) - Battery Current
4. Zhang, X., Kong, X., Li, G. and Li, J., “Thermodynamic
assessment of active cooling/heating methods for lithium-ion RB (Ω) - Battery Impedance
batteries of electric vehicles in extreme conditions,” Energy 64 t (second) - Time
(2014) 1092-1101, 2014
The Engineering Meetings Board has approved this paper for publication. It has successfully completed SAE’s peer review process under the supervision of the session organizer. The process
requires a minimum of three (3) reviews by industry experts.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or
otherwise, without the prior written permission of SAE International.
Positions and opinions advanced in this paper are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of SAE International. The author is solely responsible for the content of the paper.
ISSN 0148-7191
http://papers.sae.org/2015-01-0248