Scribd
Upload
31 views3 pages

Prof Ed 7 Rating Scale

The document contains two sections. The first section is a checklist for rating reporters in a class, which includes criteria like discussing topics knowledgeably and maintaining eye contact. The second section provides a rating scale for evaluating teaching effectiveness, with descriptors for ratings of 1 to 5 and categories for commitment and knowledge of subject.

Uploaded by

preciousjulietfelizardo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
31 views3 pages

Prof Ed 7 Rating Scale

The document contains two sections. The first section is a checklist for rating reporters in a class, which includes criteria like discussing topics knowledgeably and maintaining eye contact. The second section provides a rating scale for evaluating teaching effectiveness, with descriptors for ratings of 1 to 5 and categories for commitment and knowledge of subject.

Uploaded by

preciousjulietfelizardo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Precious Juliet D.

Felizardo
BSED ENGLISH 3A
PROF ED 7

CHECKLIST
This is a checklist, a scoring checklist for rating the reporters in the class.

Definition YES NO
Does the reporter discuss
the topic knowledgably ,
brief and concise
explanation, and provide
detailed information?
Does the reporters
elaborate the terms that
are unfamiliar?
Does the reporter maintain
eye contact with the class?
Does the reporter speech
flow is smooth and without
pauses?
Does the reporter voice is
clear and loud enough to
hear the reporter voice at
the back?
Does the reporter speaks
with enthusiasm, poise and
assurance

RATING SCALE
Teaching Effectiveness Evaluation (Students)
Please evaluate the faculty using the scale below.
SCALE Descriptive Rating Qualitative Description

5 Outstanding The performance always exceeds the jobs


requirements . The faculty is an exceptional role model

4 Very Satisfactory The performance meets and often exceeds the job
requirements.
3 Satisfactory The performance meets exceeds the jobs
requirements.
2 Fair The performance needs development/meet the job
requirements.
1 Poor The faculty fails to meet the job requirements.

A. COMMITMENT
1. Demonstrate sensitivity to student’s ability to attend and absorb content
information.
5 Outstanding
4 Very Satisfactory
3 Satisfactory
2 Fair
1 Poor

2.. Integrates sensitivity his/her learning objective with those of the students in a
collaborative process.
*
5 Outstanding
4 Very Satisfactory
3 Satisfactory
2 Fair
1 Poor

3. Makes self available to students beyond official time.


*
5 Outstanding
4 Very Satisfactory
3 Satisfactory
2 Fair
1 Poor

B. KNOWLEDGE OF SUBJECT
1. Demonstrates mastery of the subject matter (explain the subject matter
through the use of appropriate online/flexible learning resources)
*
5 Outstanding
4 Very Satisfactory
3 Satisfactory
2 Fair
1 Poor

2. Draws and share information on the state on the art of theory and practice in
his/her discipline.
*
5 Outstanding
4 Very Satisfactory
3 Satisfactory
2 Fair
1 Poor

3. Integrates subject to practical circumstances and learning intents/ purposes of


students.
*
5 Outstanding
4 Very Satisfactory
3 Satisfactory
2 Fair
1 Poor

You might also like