REPORTING COR 006 / COR 013

GROUP RATING
Criteria Unsatisfactory-Beginning Developing Accomplished Exemplary Total
Presentation/ 0-27 points 28-31 points 32-35 points 36-40 points /40
Content The presentation content shows a lack of Presentation content shows a general Presentation content shows an adequate Presentation content shows a thorough
(Group grade) understanding of the topic. There is understanding of the topic. There is understanding of the topic. Some research understanding of the topic. Substantive
inadequate evidence of research and limited evidence of research in locating effort is evident in locating relevant research effort is evident in locating
insufficient relevant information and facts. relevant information and facts and/or information and facts. The content is relevant information and facts. Content is
Content is confusing and/or contains supporting statements made. Content mostly accurate and reasonably organized. accurate and sequenced in a clear, logical
frequent inaccuracies. Required elements contains some inaccuracies, May contain some inconsistencies in way. All required elements are included
are missing and/or randomly organized. inconsistencies, misinterpretations, content or some connections made may and sources are properly cited (APA 6th
Sources, if included, generally lack proper and/or is somewhat unclear. A not be supported. Required elements are ed.).
citation format (APA 6th ed.). required element may be missing included and sources are properly cited
and/or some sources may be (APA 6th ed.) for the most part.
improperly cited (APA 6th ed.).
Presentation/ 0-11 points 12 points 13 points 14-15 points /15
Design Slides generally lack visual appeal and are Slides generally include a mix of white Slides are effectively designed with visual Slides are visually well-designed, and
(Group grade) text-heavy with little or no visuals and/or space, visuals, and/or text but not appeal including white space, visuals, and aesthetically pleasing with appropriate
exhibit an overuse of color or animations. consistently and/or some overuse or minimal text for the most part. Color and use of white space, visuals, and minimal
Media, (e.g., images), if used, are rarely cited inappropriate use of color or animations are used appropriately. Theme text, on each slide. Color and animations
on each slide. No theme is evident and the animations. Theme (e.g., template) is (e.g., template) is evident in the are used judiciously. Theme (e.g.,
presentation appears disjointed rather than not consistently evident throughout the presentation for the most part to produce template) is evident throughout to
unified and/or frequent errors (grammar, presentation, and/or some errors a cohesive presentation and/or minor produce a highly cohesive presentation.
punctuation, spelling, formatting, etc.) on (grammar, punctuation, spelling, errors (grammar, punctuation, spelling, Free from errors (grammar, punctuation,
the slides formatting, etc.) on the slides. formatting, etc.) on the slides. spelling, formatting, etc.) on the slides.
Presentation/ 0-11 points 12 points 13 points 14-15 points /15
Oral Delivery Ineffective in delivering the oral Somewhat effective in delivering the Effective in delivering the oral presentation Highly effective in delivering a well-
(Group grade) presentation demonstrating below oral presentation demonstrating demonstrating good communication skills polished oral presentation within the
average/poor communication skills. average communication skills. Slightly and generally close to the time limit for the time limit for the group to present (20
Substantially over/under the time limit to over/under the time limit. Some group to present (20 minutes total). All minutes total). All group members
present and/or not all members presented. members presented more than others. group members presented and presented equally. Preparation was
Lack of preparation was evident. More preparation was needed. preparation was evident for the most part. strongly evident.

Timeliness* and Deduct 11 points-overall failing Deduct 6-10 points Deduct 1-5 points 0 points deducted /10
Length of Collaborative presentation is completed 2-3 Collaborative presentation is completed Collaborative presentation is Collaborative presentation is completed
Presentation days (49-72 hours) or more after the deadline 1-2 days (25-48 hours) after the deadline completed within 1 day (24 hours) by the deadline and meets the required
(Group grade) and/or substantially lacks/exceeds the required and/or is somewhat lacking (or exceeds) after the deadline and meets the length (10-15 slides).
length. the required length. required length (10-15 slides).
(* unexcused late)
TOTAL POINTS (sum of 4 Criteria) /80
Name of the Student: ________________________________________ Date: ____________
Strand and Section: _______________________
Group #: _________________ Topic discussed: ________________________

INDIVIDUAL RATING
Criteria Unsatisfactory-Beginning Developing Accomplished Exemplary Total
Contribution to 0-16 points 17-19 points 20-22 points 23-25 points /25
Group
(Individual
grade)

0-16 points 17-19 points 20-22 points 23-25 points /25

Based on students’ journal reflections or Based on students’ journal Based on students’ journal Based on students’ journal
feedback evaluation forms, group reflections or feedback evaluation reflections or feedback evaluation reflections or feedback evaluation
members rarely participated or forms, group members participated forms, group members forms, group members participated
contributed to the project towards in the project but the emphasis was participated in the project and fully in the project and shared the
achieving the goals and meeting the on completing their work. Allowed shared the workload. Contributed workload fairly. Contributed to the
deadline. Did not share workload fairly others to assume leadership and/or to the development of the development of the presentation
and/or was a disruptive influence. may have not shared workload fairly presentation. Worked towards and assisted in editing others’ work
towards achieving the project goals achieving the project goals and to produce a polished presentation.
and meeting the deadline. meeting the deadline. Coordinated group efforts and/or
demonstrated leadership to facilitate
and achieve the project goals and
meet deadlines.

Leader’s Rate: ____________________________

Reason:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Schedule of the Reporting

Guidelines
1. Have a meeting with your groupmates and discuss who will do the following tasks:
a. Visual aid makers
b. reporters
c. quiz makers and checkers of the modules (you may use the SAS as the final output of the students)
2. Group members who presented physically are exempted from the quiz or answering the SAS on that particular day.
3. Leaders must rate the members and explain the rating according to the rubric provided attached above:
4. All members must have their copy of the INDIVIDUAL RATING SHEET.
5. ALL leaders must have their copy of the GROUP SHEET during the presentation.