Essay On Human Rights
Writing an essay on the topic of human rights can be a challenging task, as it requires a
comprehensive understanding of the subject matter, a deep exploration of historical and
contemporary contexts, and the ability to articulate complex ideas in a clear and concise manner.
Human rights encompass a wide range of issues, from civil and political rights to economic, social,
and cultural rights, making the topic vast and multifaceted.
Researching the various aspects of human rights involves delving into legal frameworks, international
treaties, and the cultural and societal nuances that shape the discourse. The writer must navigate
through the intricacies of human rights violations, global perspectives, and the ongoing struggle for
justice and equality. Crafting a well-structured essay involves presenting a coherent argument
supported by evidence, engaging with diverse perspectives, and addressing counterarguments to
strengthen the overall thesis.
Moreover, the challenge lies not only in presenting information but also in evoking empathy and a
sense of urgency in the reader. Balancing a factual, analytical approach with a human touch requires
a nuanced writing style. The essay should not only inform but also inspire reflection and a deeper
understanding of the importance of human rights in today's world.
In conclusion, writing an essay on human rights demands more than just research and analysis; it
requires a commitment to fostering awareness and advocating for justice. It is a complex endeavor
that necessitates a thoughtful and compassionate approach to bring attention to the issues at hand.
For those who find the task daunting, seeking assistance from platforms like HelpWriting.net can
provide access to expertly crafted essays and a wealth of resources on related topics.
Essay On Human Rights Essay On Human Rights
Sumerians, Egyptians, and Chinese Contributions
Did you know that Sumerians developed the world s first form of writing? That many of
today s household objects were invented or used by the ancient Egyptians (lock and keys,
combs, scissors, wigs, makeup, deodorants, toothbrush and toothpaste)? Or that for the
last 4,000 years China has been the oldest continuous civilization on Earth? The
Sumerians, Egyptians, and Chinese created flourishing civilizations filled with many
achievements in writing, architecture, and technology that made lasting contributions to
humankind.
Sumer is referred to as the cradle of civilization because there were many important
inventions. Writing was one of Sumerians most important invention. Sumerians
developed the world s first known writing, cuneiform, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Only a small, educated elite had the time to master this system. Despite some changes
made through the years, the fundamental principles of the Chinese system still endures
today. As a result, the legacy of the Chinese system is that people speaking essentially
different languages, such as Mandarin and Cantonese, can read and understand the same
text. The Chinese had a very unique form of architecture. A Chinese structure is based
on the principle of balance and symmetry. Office buildings, residences, temples, and
palaces all follow the principle that the main structure is the axis. Other structures are
positioned as two wings on either side to form the main room and the yard. The
distribution of interior space reflects Chinese social and ethical values. China had a very
advanced technology development. Bronze and iron played a major role. Weapons,
chariot fittings, musical instruments, and religious ritual vessels were made from it. One
of the most important contributions China made to humankind was its writing system
that united all parts of China. Other contributions include paper making, printing,
gunpowder, and the mariner s compass. Small inventions like these have made a huge
difference in our society today. Ancient civilizations all around have contributed
something to the world we live in today. Sumer, Egypt and China have had many
Terrell Davis s Influence On Early American Football
Terrell Davis
Cheers in the crowd Terrell Davis had just scored a touchdown! Terrell Davis played
running back for the Denver Broncos. He is a hall of famer and had many
accomplishments.
Terrell Davis was born on October 28, 1972 in San Diego. His mother had 8 kids and
Terrell. He became famous for playing professional football. 1972 Present. Early Life
When Terrell Davis was a senior at Lincoln High school his coaches gave him a chance
at fullback. He played other positions including kicker. He led his team to a 12 2 record.
After his graduation he went on to play football at Long Beach State University. His
brother, Reggie ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In his rookie year, the first play of his career was on a kickoff. He went after the
returner and laid the crap out of him. By the end of his first season he had rushed for
1117 yards. The next season he rushed for 1538 yards and 13 touchdowns. He kept on
improving each season. In 1997, Terrell broke his own personal records and rushed for
1750 yards and 15 touchdowns. That season he carried the broncos through the playoffs
and won the super bowl and the super bowl MVP. The next season he won the National
Football League MVP. He rushed for over 2000 yards and 21 touchdowns. His team won
the super bowl again. The next few season he regressed from injures. His final season
was in 2001 he had injured his
Suspense In Come On Hally By Bernard Fugard
Fugard begins the play with very simple, ordinary characters. That use some light
hearted, comedic and joyful phrases and informal dialogue which later begins to sound
more serious and rough through more formal phrases.
The tension slowly rises and Fugard keeps the audience hooked with every detail. He
uses a variety of literary techniques in a short time between the two phone calls, from
Hally s mother. Hally is therefore creating suspense for the audience and Fugard uses the
powerful verb in the stage directions slamming for a dramatic effect in performance.
However, shortly after this rise in suspense, Fugard uses the calming phrase of Come on
Hally to reduce the tension.
As the audience is aware that the character does not feel loved or cared by his father and
his horrified to hear that his father will return home, they only hear Hallys side of the
conversation, his responses ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Fugard, gradually begins to darken the language and the play becomes emotionally
tougher to see. Increasing violence, hatred and the words that are suddenly used as
weapons without filters What, chum? A niggers arse . When Hally tells Sam to call
him Master Harold, Sam sais: If you...,I ll never call you anything else again . Indicating
also the strong comparison as to earlier on when we saw the lightness, now turning to
these heartbreaking moments. Now totally reckless makes it harder to see how there is a
sudden fall in the character followed by An ugly attempt at laughter the situation seems
painful and therefore leaving the audience in a unexpected position. Fugard makes Sams
character not rise to Hally s attack immediately but waits, and waits until he does, which
creates even further tension in the audience as they are left in silence and unknowing
about what the characters will perform next, these small peaks of tension keep building
to the
Essay on Henry VI and the Wars of the Roses
From his fifteen year minority to the inept rule of the rest of his reign, Henry VI was a
child , at least as far as governing ability was concerned. The period of his minority and
the time that he was the titular king laid the groundwork for the Wars of the Roses. Had
Henry been an intelligent king, with at least some political acumen, and the ability to
win the respect of his nobles, their may have never been any Warsof the Roses. But his
weakness in allowing government by favorites and governingfoolishly on his own, at the
very least directed his country down the road to a bloody civil war.
Henry VI was born on December 6, 1421, and became king of England on September 1,
1422. Problems began almost immediately, though these ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Since it was made up of nobles, they tried to protect each others interests, something not
always for the public good.
Even after he had come of age, Henry suffered from a lack of popular support,
something that invariably helps the other side in a civil war. He was considered a
fool by the general populace, which weakened his authority. During his reign, there
were many charges of seditious libel to come before the courts (Storey, 34) and they
usually dealt with someone slandering the king. Common people and yeomen were
calling the king a lunatic , a child, and a fool (Storey, 35). For instance, one Sussex
yeoman called the king a natural fool and said that the king was no person able to rule
the land (Storey, 35). Evidently, if even the common people were slandering the king,
they must have had some basis for it. The king did nothing to prove the people wrong,
rarely going on progresses to smooth out his image. He stayed in the Home Counties for
much of his reign, and even that did not improve his image with the people.
Among the upper classes, he proved over and over again that he was not a good king.
He rarely, if ever, participated in Parliament, and often did not attend sittings of the king
s council. When the council sat at Westminster, Henry usually managed to be somewhere
else (Storey, 35). These actions give a picture of a king who, though solicited for his
opinions, did not want to get involved in the
Lies In Cat s Cradle
Vonnegut does, however, see the opportunities that religion provides into self discovery.
He uses his own, fictional religion in Cat s Cradle to bring the protagonist out of his
comfort zone. The doctrine of Bokononism, is that everything is a lie. This mysterious
paradox, the concept that lies are a direct pathway to the truth, is Vonnegut s way to
dissuade readers from trying to understand God s, and likely his, intentions. He does this
by first insulting spiritual people. Bokonon, the named figure of his religion, says, She
was a fool, and so am I, and so is anyone who thinks he knows what God is Doing (Cat s
Cradle 5). The unique part of Bokononism, is that Vonnegut makes a commodity of his
own deceit. Bokonon confesses, All of the... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Yet, this still puts science in the wrong, as he denounces its ability to exist in peace
with humanity. A man says, I am a very bad scientist. I will do anything to make a
human being feel better, even if it s unscientific. No scientist worthy of the name
could say such a thing (Cat s Cradle 219). Similarly, science is the means with which
Vonnegut terminates this fictional world. He uses a commissioned scientist s
amusement with a horrible idea to show the danger of advancement for advancement s
sake. The man that ends the world does so in his playful way, and all his ways were
playful (Cat s Cradle 43). Though he ultimately feels that science got in the way of his
own self awareness as a child because it seemed to be a club that did not grant him
membership, Vonnegut uses science to bring John a sense of comprehension.
The comprehension garnered by science in the commercial world, however, was seen as
more detrimental than beneficial by Vonnegut. John says, Nothing generous about it.
New knowledge is the most valuable commodity on earth. The more truth we have to
work with, the richer we become. Had I been a Bokononist, that statement would have
made me howl (Cat s Cradle 41). This statement relays the lie that Vonnegut feels science
represents, but by using it here, he fosters his protagonist s journey to
How Is Hector Justified In Killing Achilles
Have you ever wanted to take a look into the life of the gods and goddesses? Meet
Achilles, demigod, son of a mortal king and a goddess. The king of Myrmidons, and
the mightiest of the Greek warriors. Achilles and Hector have been at war with each
other for years. Hector, terrible Hector, murdered Achilles closest friend. This couldn t be
brushed off, revenge must be had. Achillessought to avenge the wrongful death of his
dear friend. Hectordidn t know what he was in for, until it was too late.
The limp body of Hector lay on the ground, finally dead. Starting with Achilles, the
Greek troops vigorously stabbed Hector s lifeless body. Disrespecting it with each
thrust of their gleaming weapons. Achilles had a profusion of contempt for Hector, the
lunge into Hector s body was just the beginning of releasing his rage. However justified
this act was, it was rather dishonorable to have been done by someone with as much
honor, in the eyes of his people, as Achilles. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Achilles, the honorable Achilles, then stabs Hector s spiritless body. In doing this he
is dishonoring Hector and ignoring Trojan burial rights. Achilles brings dishonor upon
himself by doing so. Burial rights are very important to the Trojans and the Greeks.
They believed that if a body went unburied the person s soul never found peace. They
relied heavily on women when it came to burial, the closest women relatives would
wash and wrap the body in the traditional burial shroud. Denying a soul peace by
refusing proper burial was very dishonorable. Achilles may be a demigod, however that
does not exempt him from allowing Hector s family to follow the unspoken
