100%(2)100% found this document useful (2 votes) 87 views12 pagesShipton On Mingus
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
A New History OF
JAZZ
Revised and Updated Edition
Alyn Shipton
XN
continuum
NEW YORK * LONDONCOLTRANE AND MINGUS 55S
Charles Mingus
Here’s Charles Mingus, standard issue thumbnail sketch. A fat,
bristling, light-skinned black guy who busted people on the
bandstand, who stopped his shows midstream if a cash register rang
or a fan or a musician said or did something that set him off. If he was
set off enough, he yelled at or lectured or swung on or pulled a blade
on the offender, like he was the 240-pound wrath of Zeus.
Gene Santoro, from Myself When I Am Real
reas John Coltrane was the outstanding jazz instrumentalist of the 1960s, Charles
is was its outstanding composer — building on his considerable achievements of
middle-to-late 1950s, He was an outsize personality as well — a stocky, powerful
ing man, and on stage he had a charismatic presence, although he was often at the
ser of controversy and rows. I first heard him perform at the New Orleans Jazz and
‘tage Festival in 1976, where fortunately there were no rows. He played a
ficent solo set lasting over an hour; his intense concentration and sheer force of
ical ideas held a vast, bustling tent almost silent as he played both on double bass556 NEW JAZZ
and on piano. Much of that set was a long exploration of the Vernon Duke standard |
Can’t Get Started — one of the pieces that fascinated Mingus, and from which he
seemed constantly able to squeeze new ideas.’ Later, playing a set with his quintet of
the time and performing his own music, he went a long way to proving that he was,
after Duke Ellington, the most prolific and versatile composer in jazz.
Not every audience in every venue saw that pensive, creative side of Mingus at
work. Mingus viewed himself as an outsider, and all too often he behaved as one. His
frequently stated anti-establishment views, and the kind of behavior as caricatured
above by Gene Santoro, often tended to obscure the creative genius of his finest work.
However, starting from his childhood in Los Angeles, the reasons mounted as to why
he should feel excluded: he could count European, African, and Asian blood in his
lineage, and his schoolmates taunted him as a “yellow nigger.” His father (an ex-
soldier) had “passed” for white, but Mingus’s complexion precluded this; however, it
also prevented his acceptance by many of his African-American contemporaries,
thereby effectively excluding him from the two main social groups in the district of Los
Angeles in which he was raised, He recalled: “I just found myself with the Japanese,
the Greeks, the Italians and Mexicans, and a few more guys like me.””**
He carried this sense of social isolation into both his education and his music.
Despite an unusually high IQ, he performed abysmally in school; as an instrumentalist,
a false start on trombone having led him to become a cellist, he was essentially self-
taught, so that, even in the area in which he was to excel, he did not at first learn to
read music fluently, and relied instead on his exceptional musical ear.
‘The quality of his ear was readily apparent to saxophonist Buddy Collette, one of
Mingus's lifelong friends who, when he was fourteen and Mingus was just thirteen,
coerced the young cellist into trading in his cello for a double bass. By the following
week, Mingus was playing a Saturday night dance with Collette’s band. Collette wid
The things he did that first night on the bass showed that he had real ability.
It’s amazing to hear somebody with musical talent, . .. Mingus's notes that
first gig were not right — not that he didn’t have good ears. It’s just that
he didn’t know where the notes were . .. but his time was good. . .. All of
a sudden there was a feeling and a choice of rhythm patterns right from the
beginning that told me this was someone special.
Collette and a small circle of musical acquaintances, including the trombonist Britt
Woodman, recognized immediately that Mingus was outstandingly talented, and they
took his musical education in hand. Collette introduced him to Red Callender, =
prominent bassist in Los Angeles who had worked with many high-profile musicians
including Louis Armstrong. Callender became a teacher and mentor for Mingus, whe
in due course ended up briefly playing in Armstrong’s big band himself. Mingus als»
went on to study with Herman Rheinschagen, a former bassist with the New Yor
Philharmonic.
In addition to intensive musical practice, Mingus improved his personal confidence
through self-defense training and weight lifting, and allied himself firmly with the loca!
African-American community, making what his biographer Brian Priestley describes =
“a conscious choice to be an underdog rather than an outcast.”
Mingus became a prominent figure on the Los Angeles jazz scene during the heist
of Central Avenue’s importance as the center of local activity, described in Chapter =COLTRANE AND MINGUS 557
While they were still teenagers, to the amusement of other passengers, he and Collette
would jam on the Red line streetcar that wound its way via Central from Watts in the
south to downtown Los Angeles in the north; they also took part in the rich world of
after-hours playing that was on offer. Also, Mingus — along with many other
Promising musicians of his generation — studied with trumpeter Lloyd Reese, a key
figure in the musical community of Central Avenue, who taught at the old black
Musicians’ Union building in the heart of the area’s clubs,
Much of the prewar world of African-American entertainment rubbed off on
Mingus, both from playing gigs around Los Angeles with veterans like Kid Ory and
Barney Bigard, and from his subsequent period in Armstrong's big band, Just as Charlie
Parker and Miles Davis were to do on the East Coast, he rejected the eye-rolling,
mugging stage persona of such older entertainers, nevertheless simultaneously
acquiring a knowledge of and respect for the sounds they made: “our” music, as he
called it. This was to resurface in a significant proportion of his later work as a
composer and performer, which contains a dramatic balance between material drawn
directly from both the African-American vaudeville tradition (songs like Eat That
Chicken, or his parody of a 1920s dance routine on Cocktails for Two) and the
uncompromisingly moder improvisations of musicians like saxophonist Eric Dolphy
(another Central Avenue alumnus). Mingus was also to draw the sounds of gospel
music and the church into his jazz vocabulary, just as he was to assimilate the
compositional language of Duke Ellington, whose band made a huge impact on his own
as young man. Initially, however, his career was more of a player than of a composer.
Mingus appeared on the scene at the right moment to build on the innovations in
double-bass playing that had been pioneered by Milt Hinton, Jimmy Blanton, and
Oscar Pettiford, and which were being taken forward by other musicians of his own
generation such as Ray Brown. He instinctively understood the harmonic innovations
of bebop, although these played a more significant role in his own playing after 1950,
but to start with, by combining his own ideas with the technical approaches to
ensemble and solo playing learnt from Callender, he became both a melodic and an
artful constructor of bass-lines, and a soloist of distinction. In between his work with
the “name” bands of Armstrong (in 1943) and Lionel Hampton (1947-48), in which
he began to prove his credentials at a national level, he worked with Collette in a
cooperative octet called the Stars of Swing. When the group opened at the Downbeat
on Central Avenue, its leadership was almost hijacked by tenorist Lucky Thompson,
but the members of the band had established, through long hours of rehearsal at
Mingus's house, a set of new compositions and a novel approach to dynamics, so
‘Thompson was forced to back down in the collective interest, eventually being
replaced by Teddy Edwards. Several members of the group recorded under “Baron”
Mingus's leadership, and the results are comparable to a forward-looking Ellington
senall’ group of the period, unusually rich in color and texture. (A. particularly
Ellingtonian aspect of Mingus's highly atmospheric recording from May 1946 of Pipe
Pream comes from Britt Woodman’s eloquent trombone solo — much in the style of
Lawrence Brown, whose place he was to take in the Ellington band in February 1951.)
Pianist Gerald Wiggins was working close at hand to the Downbeat, and he
described Mingus at that time:
Mingus was a hothead, he was ready to fight for anything. He was a bit
erratic, but he had so many things going on in his mind. He wanted to do it
ea558 NEW JAZZ
all — write, compose, play bass — and if it was possible to do all those
things at the same time he would have done it.*”
The Stars of Swing did not last, but its discs helped to cement Mingus's local
reputation, and his opportunity to make a national name arrived in Los Angeles in 1947
with Lionel Hampton’s orchestra. The vibraphonist was looking for a second bassist to
play alongside Joe Comfort in his lineup, and take solos — something Mingus was well
equipped to do. The young bassist also brought an arrangement of his own Mingus
Fingers to the band, which Hampton recorded in November 1947. There was
something of an altercation over payment, as Gladys Hampton (Lionel’s wife and
manager) tended not to pay such inexperienced arrangers for one-off pieces of work.
After Mingus left, taking the parts for his chart with him, he recorded the piece again
with his old friend Buddy Collette back in Los Angeles. Collette recalled:
Those sessions were done for Dolphin’s of Hollywood. We did Mingus
Fingers and These Foolish Things. Dolphin didn’t pay you any money, but he
was recording everybody. Nobody, none of the big companies like Capitol,
were taking any interest in jazz, but this man started recording jazz. His
discs got played on the radio and that helped you get a name.”
The playing on this chamber jazz disc is sufficiently unusual to make the point
immediately as to why radio play would have boosted Mingus’s reputation, After a
chromatic introduction from Collette’s clarinet, he and Mingus play the head of Mingus
Fingers in unison, showing Mingus's clear articulation. His subsequent unaccompanied
bass chorus makes light of the chordal structure of the piece, in a solo that very much
builds on the style established in the early 1940s by Oscar Pettiford. What is unique
about it is Mingus’s singing sense of melody — it is clear this is a bassist with no
hidebound concept of his role as simply that of anchoring the rhythm section, and with
a formidable ability to attack his notes with precision and power.
He was fortunate to be able to develop this side of his playing by becoming part of
a group that was designed to show off the bass to the full, In 1950, he joined a trio with
guitarist Tal Farlow and vibraphonist Red Norvo (precursor of the lineup that played
opposite Gerry Mulligan at the Haig), and their lightweight, open sound was the
perfect setting for his playing. He was with the group only until 1951, but in that brief
time, the trio began to be featured in jazz polls, and they made several discs. In them
are plenty of details that pick up on the small-group innovations in Mingus Fingers,
including Mingus playing high-note solos while Farlow accompanied him by producing
bass-lines on the guitar.
Not since Jimmy Blanton had a bassist generated the kind of press attention that
Mingus attracted. Ralph J. Gleason's Down Beat review of the trio, late in Mingus's
tenure, was typical:
Musicians and public share one opinion regarding Charlie — he’s the
greatest bass player they have ever scen. Smiling and happy, playing
unbelievable things with apparent ease, Charlie after all these months with
the beautiful Norvo trio still knocks out Red and Tal every night.
Charlie Mingus is not only one of the most impressive of the contemporaryCOLTRANE AND MINGUS 559
musicians, but one of the most impressive thinkers about music that jazz
%
has produced.
One reason in particular for Gleason’s interest in Mingus was that the bassist had
written him a lengthy letter, setting out his beliefs, which Gleason went on to publish,
In it are many ideas that Mingus had already explored both in his life and in his work
for example, the question of the difference between jazz and classical music, and the
respective abilities of such musicians to swing. But most important is a statement —
almost a mission statement — that linked Mingus’s philosophy directly to that of
Ellington: “True jazz is an art, and as with all the arts, is the individual’s means of
expressing his deepest and innermost feelings and emotions.”
In the mid-to-late 1950s, Mingus was to move further and further toward the
position where his music would get fully to grips with those deep feelings and
emotions, and to do so, he drew on the full breadth of the jazz tradition, He was not a
narrowly restricted bebop player, any more than he was merely an adventurous swing
player: he was already showing signs of his genuine originality. His friends Buddy
Collette and Britt Woodman both commented that if there was a different way to do
something normal and straightforward, Mingus would probably find it. Except, that is,
in actually getting down to the business of writing music. On his return to Los Angeles
from a road tour with Les Hite in the 1940s, Woodman had been staggered to observe
how Mingus had developed as a musician, not just as a bassist, but as a pianist and
composer, and he immediately made the very telling comparison to Ellington: “His
writing was similar. He had Duke in mind. See, the thing was, Mingus was so natural,
what he heard, he could write.’”*?
After leaving Norvo, with whom he had traveled quite extensively, Mingus settled
in New York. Once there, he built on his reputation as an innovative and versatile
bassist, and he began playing at the highest level with musicians, including Bud Powell,
Billy Taylor, and (briefly) Duke Ellington. His short stay in the Ellington Orchestra was
ended in typically hotheaded fashion, through an altercation with trombonist Juan Tizol,
the first of many high-profile scuffles from Mingus's East Coast career. In the mid-
1950s, Mingus and drummer Max Roach coformed a record company, called Debut,
which preserved much of Mingus's work from this period, including the famous 1953
Massey Hall concert with Charlie Parker and Dizzy Gillespie, discussed in Chapter 7.
Perhaps because of the long hours that he, Collette, and the Woodmans had spent
jamming at Mingus's house in Los Angeles, he was drawn to the idea of writing and
playing in a workshop setting. Other composers with whom he joined forces included
Teo Macero and Teddy Charles, but this first stab at a Jazz Composers’ Workshop did
not give Mingus quite the forum he wanted for composition and improvisation. So, in
1955, he began his own Jazz Workshop, assembling a like-minded collection of
individuals (many of them having West Coast connections, including trombonist Jimmy
Knepper and saxophonist Eric Dolphy from Los Angeles, and altoist John Handy, who
had worked for years in San Francisco).
There are parallels here with the work of Gil Evans and his “salon” during the
Birth of the Cool period, and also with the Jazz Workshop group of George Russell, But
whereas Evans was interested in developing his very individual style of orchestration
and arrangement, and Russell was experimenting with his modal theories, Mingus was
aiming higher — to create a body of work that would genuinely explore the whole
gamut of human emotion.560 EW JAZZ
The workshop was to be his preferred method of evolving his compositions over
the following years. In order to communicate ideas that did not translate easily to
paper, he liked to sing or dictate the parts each musician was to play, so that they heard
rather than read the music. (There are, however, stories of how his regular pianist Jaki
Byard surreptitiously jotted down the parts so that the band could remember them
later.) As he composed, Mingus increasingly used the piano, eventually playing the
instrument in his live performances
In the ten years from 1955, Mingus established two constants in his work: a set of
related pieces that changed gradually from performance to performance, and the pool
of players mentioned above, who specialized in interpreting his ideas. Consequently, a
composition like Fables of Faubus (written in 1959 and reworked in 1964) was also
developed into Original Faubus Fables (1960) and New Fables (1964). Over time, this and
numerous other pieces mutated, just as improvising musicians might alter their
approaches to playing a solo,
One of the pieces that altered over time was Mingus's Haitian Fight Song (later
called I! B. S.). His comments on the 1957 recording made for Atlantic (some two
years after first writing the piece) are illuminating about why this and so many of his
performances were packed with meaning — becoming Signifyin(g) events for their
audience:
[It] could just as well be called Afro-American Fight Song. It has a folk spirit,
the kind of folk music I’ve always heard anyway. It has some of the old
church feeling too. I was raised a Methodist but there was a Holiness
Church on the corner and some of the feeling of their music, which was
wilder, got into our music, There's a moaning feeling in those church
modes. ... My solo in it is a deeply concentrated one. I can’t play it right
unless I'm thinking about prejudice and hate and persecution and how
unfair it is. There's sadness and cries in it, but also determination. And it
usually ends with me feeling, “I told them! I hope somebody heard me!’"*
On this recording, originally issued on his album The Clown, as he was to do in the
majority of his groups in the later 1950s through to the 1960s, Mingus used drummer
Dannie Richmond, with whom he developed an exceptionally flexible rhythmic
platform for his soloists. Bass and drums moved the beat around, making abrupt
transitions into double or triple time, or sometimes dropping out altogether. In this
piece, after an introductory section for solo bass, Mingus introduces a five-note
ostinato pattern that underpins the main theme statement and its various repetitions
Trombone and alto are joined in the opening section by shouts and wails, before the
trombone takes off into a solo. Underpinning this, Mingus and Richmond run through
several ideas — alluding to the ostinato, then frantically doubling the tempo, before
playing a series of stops that emphasize the first three beats of each measure, then
returning to a swing tempo. This series of basic accompanimental ideas is used for both
piano and alto solos but varies the sequence in which they are introduced, so creating
the impression that the piece is a more complex construction than it appears. Mingus's
bass solo is suitably harsh and angry to express the feelings he described, but it also
runs through the same basic variations in pattern and speed that are used behind the
other soloists.
On other pieces with this “folk spirit” or gospel feel, Mingus and Richmond ringCOLTRANE AND MINGUS 561
the rhythmic changes even more dramatically, governed by the sense that the beat itself
is a movable element and that they could break down old swing era or bebop concepts
of a constant, unvarying pulse, yet without losing a sense of being directly connected to
the entire African-American music tradition. Whereas a musician like Don Ellis (who
occasionally collaborated with Mingus) was to experiment with unorthodox time
signatures, Mingus and Richmond proved that it was possible to create immense
flexibility, a sense of ebb and flow, inside a conventional time signature. On Wednesday
Night Prayer Meeting, with a larger Jazz Workshop band, from the 1959 album Blues and
Roots they create a six-eight pulse into which pianist Horace Parlan feeds in and out,
sometimes playing with and sometimes against them; at other times they stop playing,
leaving the brass and reeds to continue with just handclaps or shouts for
accompaniment
In contrast to the cool of Miles Davis, or, contemporaneously, the reductions by
John Coltrane of the harmonic complexity of his accompaniments, Mingus’s backings
are extrovert, both rhythmically and harmonically dense, and driven by a sense of
ensemble in which all the players are equal — there is no sense (as there sometimes is
with Coltrane) that the band consists of a star soloist being backed by a mere rhythm
section.
Against this kind of varied setting, in much the same way as Ellington had done,
Mingus created music that would exploit the musical personalities of his musicians: the
jagged saxophone and bass clarinet of Eric Dolphy, the sparring saxes of John Handy
and Booker Ervin, the gospel-tinged reeds of Roland Kirk, the rounded trombones of
Jimmy Knepper and Britt Woodman, and the witty, eclectic piano of Jaki Byard.
For much of the second half of the 1950s, Mingus recorded for the Atlantic label,
to whom Coltrane was also signed at the end of the decade. Briefly, these two
musicians, who were responsible for shaping so much of the music of the years that
followed were marketed alongside one another. Today, Atlantic’s continuing
reputation rests largely on its innovative and exemplary jazz catalog of that period,
which was also to include Ornette Coleman. But in the eyes of Ahmet Ertegun, its then
chief executive, this music was something of an indulgence compared to his own
mission to keep signing hit rhythm-and-blues records. Looking back at those days,
during the celebrations of his company’s fiftieth birthday in 1998, he told me:
They were all signed by my elder brother Nesuhi, who died in 1989. I
didn’t have time to get too involved . .. when they were recording for us,
I was simply trying to keep the company alive. We were undercapitalized,
at risk from distributors who paid late, and depended on the product for
the following month to keep us going. I loved jazz, but it didn’t sell that
quickly, although over the years that followed, my brother’s sessions sold a
lot more copies than the overnight hits I got into.**
Mingus’s Blues and Roots session, recorded for Atlantic in February 1959, took several
months to appear, a delay explained by Ertegun’s frank exposition of the company’s
financial health. In April, during the gap between recording it and seeing it released,
Mingus signed with Columbia, and, although the original concept was a disc of Jelly
Roll Morton pieces updated in his own style, instead he made one of his most
consistently brilliant albums. Displaying the entire range of his compositional interests
and the degree to which he was in tune with the spirit of the times while562 NEW JAZZ
simultaneously going his own way, Mingus Ah Um was not just a brilliant pun — it was
a landmark in his career.
Better Git Ie in Your Soul was a six-eight gospel piece that far outdid Wednesday Night
Prayer Meeting in intensity and feeling, with shouts, handclaps, speaking in tongues, and
a range of other musical impressions. (As Gene Santoro points out, this number was in
stiff competition with the Adderley Brothers’ This Here, described in Chapter 13, which
became a hit when released as an eleven-minute single."*) Jelly Roll (the only link with
the original concept of the album) was a revision of his earlier Jelly Roll Soul and looked
backward to New Orleans and forward toward some elements of free jazz. But the
most enduring piece was a long, slow lament, Goodbye Pork Pie Hat.
From the sinuous, weaving opening, with the combined tenors of John Handy and
Booker Ervin, to Handy's exquisite, mournful solo, the piece is a masterpiece of
combined restraint and feeling. In it, despite the slow tempo, are many hallmarks of
the workshop’s approach. The wide open beat of Mingus and Richmond, with Mingus
occasionally offering a commentary on the solo rather than a bass-line, Horace Parlan
placing the occasional chordal accent in the most unexpected place, and Handy’s own
playing, which includes a section in gospel-like flutter-tonguing, all add up to the most
moving tribute to Lester Young, the wearer of the hat in question, who had died a
couple of months before the recording. The theme itself is what sticks in the mind, and
it is only after repeated hearings that one realizes that almost the entire second half of
the piece is a scored reading of the theme — Mingus’s ideal blend of the composed and
the improvised, with the join almost impossible to discern in the emotion of the
performance.
As the new decade began, Mingus entered his period of greatest creativity with a
series of outstanding compositions, including another series of musical laments, this
time for Eric Dolphy, who died in Berlin in June 1964, shortly after taking part in a
European tour with Mingus. Praying with Eric led to a whole series of evolutionary
Meditations. He also produced what many commentators believe to be his greatest
sustained work with the eleven-piece workshop of 1963, The Black Saint and the Sinner
Lady, which has the widest mix of eclectic influences found in any of his recordings, But
despite this high level of musical creativity, his own life was in turmoil, He found it
impossible to resist taking on the establishment — setting up rival free concerts outside
the Newport Festival, launching another new independent record label of his own, and
organizing performances that were often an uncomfortable mix of rehearsal and
performance, of which his 1962 New York Town Hall event was the most spectacular
disaster. By the mid-1960s, he faced financial ruin and was suffering from unstable
mental health.
His career was put on hold until 1969, when he began once more to tour and
perform, and soon afterward a Guggenheim fellowship gave him a degree of stability
and public recognition. In the early 1970s, he made his most successful big-band
recordings, Until 1977, with the onset of Lou Gehrig’s disease (amyotrophic lateral
sclerosis), a form of muscular paralysis, he toured and recorded quite regularly with his
quintet. After his paralysis took hold in earnest, he supervised a final big-band
recording of his music and wrote themes for a collaborative project with singer Joni
Mitchell, although the recorded large-band sections of this work were not included in
the final album. He died in January 1979.
Mingus was a transitional figure in jazz history. By working collectively and
dictating his compositions, he drew strong parallels with the free jazz movement,
aCOLTRANE AND MINGUS 563
which began at the start of the 1960s. Yet he never lost a sense of compositional form,
and remained fascinated by one of the biggest central issues in jazz — the boundary
between composition and improvisation. His early experience with the likes of Louis
Armstrong and Lionel Hampton gave him a strong sense of continuity and tradition,
and it is perhaps fitting that his final recorded bass solo should have been on an album
with Hampton. However, his own bands were at their best when tradition became just
one of the elements that he fused into performance, adding a wider range of effects and
ideas, including vocal tones, voice, and poetry, than any jazz bandleader before him.
The strength of his themes and compositional frameworks for improvisation have
given rise to several movements that perpetuate his music and keep it alive into the
twenty-first century. These began with the Mingus Dynasty bands of the early 1980s,
which involved several of his former sidemen, and have continued with the Mingus Big
Band, which has played regularly in New York and around the world since 1991
Gunther Schuller has frequently supervised performances of some of Mingus's large.
scale orchestral works. Since his death, his compositions have continued to be recorded
and have been performed by musicians as different (and unexpected) as the British
traditionalist Chris Barber and the former rock guitarist with the Police, Andy
Summers, thereby proving something of his universal appeal and the durability of his
writing,NOTES 761
? Francis Davis: “Take the Coltrane,” Village Voice, February 18, 1992.
> Author’s interview with Gary Giddins, May 9, 2000,
* Don DeMichael: “John Coltrane and Eric Dolphy answer the jazz. critics,” Down Beat,
April 12, 1962.
° Author’s interview with Jimmy Heath, November 17, 1999.
© Author's interview with Ira Gitler, May 8, 2000
{tra Gitler: “Trane on the track,” Down Beat, October 16, 1958.
® Brian Priestley: John Coltrane (London, Apollo Press, 1987).
° Author's interview with Ira Gitler, May 8, 2000.
"© John Coltrane and Don DeMichael: “Coltrane on Coltrane,” Down Beat, September 29,
1960, quoted in Eric Nisenson: Ascension: John Coltrane and His Quest (New York, St.
Martin's Press, 1993).
ae {, August Blume: “An interview with John Coltrane,” Jazz Review, January 1959.
? Interview with Rudy Van Gelder, included in the multimedia section of The Uhimace
Blue Train (Blue Note)
'3 John Coltrane and Don DeMichael: op. cit.
™ Author’s interview with Lewis Porter, May 7, 2000; for further details, see Lewis
Porter: John Coltrane: His Life and Music (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1998).
' Author's interview with Pat Metheny, February 21, 2000,
Author's interview with Tommy Flanagan, December 4, 1999.
7 Lewis Porter: “John Coltrane: The Atlantic years,” in The Heavyweight Champion (liner
notes to Rhino R2 71984, 1995).
*® Val Wilmer: “Conversation with Coltrane,” Jazz Journal, January 1962,
° Author's interview with Archie Shepp, April 13, 2000
°° Author's interview with Ravi Coltrane, May 8, 2000.
Benoit Quersin: “La Passe dangereuse,”” Jazz Magazine, January 1963; transcribed and
= in English by Carl Woideck in Carl Woideck: The John Coltrane Companion:
Five Decades of Commentary (New York, Schirmer, 1998).
? Author's interview with Gary Giddins, May 9, 2000.
° tra Gitler: ep. cits; pushed hard on the subject by Frank Kofsky, in “John Coltrane: an
interview" (originally published in Black Nationalism and the Revolution in Music, and
republished in Carl Woideck: op. cit.), Coltrane says: “In music I make or have tried to
make a conscious attempt to change what I've found.”
Author's interview with McCoy Tyner, March 1998.
25 Frank Kofsky: op. cit.
Elvin Jones interview from the BBC Radio sound archive.
°7 Tan Carr: “Jimmy Garrison," in lan Carr, Digby Fairweather, and Brian Priestley: Jazz:
The Rough Guide (2nd. edn.) (London, Rough Guides, 2000)
* Author's interview with Roy Haynes, May 8, 2000.
® Eric Nisenson: op. cit.
°° Frank Kofsky: op. cit
' Archie Shepp, quoted in liner notes to Ascension.
* Author's interview with Ravi Coltrane, May 8, 2000.
° Part of that performance on solo piano has been issued as Themes for a Movie (Flying Fish
FF 099)
** Brian Priestley: Mingus: A Critical Biography (London, Quartet, 1982).
at =p Collete (with Steven Isoar
(London, Continuum, 2000).
Jazz Generations: A Life in American Music and Society762 NOTES
3 Brian Priestley: Mingus: A Critical Biography (London, Quartet, 1982).
*7 Author's interview with Gerald Wiggins, November 19, 2000.
* author's interview with Buddy Collette, March 19, 2000.
*° Ralph J. Gleason: “Charlie Mingus: A thinking musician,” Down Beat, June 1, 1951
* Ibid.
“1 “Britt Woodman,” in Clora Bryant et al. (eds.): Central Avenue Sounds: Jaz in Los Angeles
(Berkeley, University of California Press, 1998).
*? Mingus, quoted in Nat Hentoff: “The clown” (liner notes to Atlantic 1260, 1957).
* Alyn Shipton: “How the stars got into the Atlantic groove” (interview with Ahmet
Ertegun), The Times, September 17, 1998.
Gene Santoro: Myself When I Am Real: The Life and Music of Charles Mingus (New York,
Oxford University Press, 2000).