Block 6
Block 6
Structure
21.0 Objectives
21.1 Introduction
21.2 Scheduled Caste as a Community—their Strength and the Background
21.2.1 Scheduled Castes: Social Backgrounds
21.2.2 Strength of the Scheduled Castes
21.2.3 The Untouchable Castes and their Origins
21.3 Constitution and the Scheduled Castes
21.3.1 Reservation Policy
21.3.2 Developmental Programmes
21.4 Identity and Social Mobility among the Scheduled Caste
21.4.1 Scheduled Castes and Social Mobility
21.4.2 Scheduled Castes Seeking a New Identity
21.5 Let Us Sum Up
21.6 Key Words
21.7 Further Readings
21.8 Answers to Check Your Progress
21.0 OBJECTIVES
After studying this unit, you should be able to:
z explain the discrimination faced by the Scheduled Castes;
z discuss various reasons as to how they were scheduled by the Government
for the purpose of reservation or constitutional benefits and to what extent
they have benefited from the Government’s development programmes;
and
z analyse how the Scheduled Castes have organised themselves socially
and politically vis-a-vis the upper castes.
21.1 INTRODUCTION
In this unit we shall analyse the Scheduled Castes as a separate and socially
stratified category. We shall look at their historical background and examine
the problems faced by them vis-a-vis the other upper castes. Following this we
shall deal with Scheduled Castes and their social mobility. Then we shall
examine the various constitutional measures and development programmes
which have been adopted for the Scheduled Castes. Finally, we shall wind up
this discussion by examining the working of the reservation policy and the
position of the Scheduled Castes in the contemporary India.
Total SC SC SC as % of Cumulative
population population population total SC
in 1991 in 1991 as % of population population
State
population
India 838,583,988 138,223,277 16.5 16.5
15 most
populous
states
Uttar Pradesh 139,112,287 29,276,455 21.0 21.2 21.2
West Bengal 68,077,965 16,080,611 23.6 11.5 32.8
Bihar 86374,465 12,571,700 14.6 9.1 41.9
Tamil Nadu 55,858,946 10,712,266 19.2 7.7 49.6
Andhra 66,508,008 10,592,066 16.9 7.7 57.3
Pradesh
Madhya 66,181,170 9,626,679 14.5 7.0 64.3
Pradesh
Maharashtra 78,937,187 8,757,842 11.1 6.3 70.6
Rajasthan 44,005,990 7,607,820 17.3 5.5 76.1
Karnataka 44,977,201 7,369,279 16.4 5.3 81.4
Punjab 20,281,969 5,724,528 28.3 4.2 85.6
Orissa 31,659,736 5,129,314 16.2 3.7 89.3
Haryana 16,463,648 3,250,933 19.7 2.4 91.7
Gujarat 41,309,582 3,060,358 7.4 2.2 93.9
Kerala 29,098,518 2,886,522 9.9 2.1 96.0
Assam 22,414,322 1,652,412 7.4 1.2 97.2
Total for 15 811,260,994 134,323,785 16.6 16.6 97.2
major states
Other smaller 27,322,994 3,899,492 14.3 14.3 2.8
states
India 838,583,988 138,223,277 16.5 16.5 100
scavenging, cremation, skinning and hiding, etc. Not only because of their
unclean occupations, but also due to their so called ‘dark complexion’ they
were placed at the bottom of the ritual and social hierarchies of the caste and
varna system. Since the Varna ashram darma – the philosophy and the religious
duty demanded that each jati was to follow one’s traditional occupation – like
priest’s son becomes a priest and a shoe-maker or tanner’s son or a becoming
a shoe maker or a heriditory tanner. It was impossible for the untouchable
castes to better their position by changing their occupation. The association of
occupation with caste became inseperable, so much so, that the very fact of
being born into a community, whether you engaged in clean or unclean activity
had become irrelevant. Thus untouchables are those castes which were outside
the pale of varna system. They were said to be polluting and marginalised and
consigned to the lowest rung in society. Several ideological justifications existed
for the sustanance of these hierarchical system, which kept everybody in their
8 place.
The untouchables had no share in the social, political and judiciary powers Scheduled Castes
and their position was almost like that of a slave. Various scholars have given
different viewpoints and explained why untouchability was practised in the
Hindu caste society.
G.Hanumantha Rao in his book Caste and Poverty says that low social status
attached to certain occupations is the cause of untouchability. It relates to impure
occupations such as removal of carcass, spinning, tanning, scavenging etc.
While analysing the origin of caste, system J.H. Hutton suggests that ideas of
ceremonial purity were first applied to aboriginals in connection with sacrificial,
ritual and certain occupational activities. Max Weber, also has described certain
occupations as ritually impure. He states, that the lowest caste structure was
considered to be absolutely defiling and contaminating. Thus, the ideas of
purity, whether occupational or ceremonial, is found to have been the factor
contributing to the genesis and evolution of caste and the practise of
untouchability,. The Vedic literature has referred to the Dharmashutras that
declare Chandalas (cremators) as a progeny of the most hated people of the
reverse order of mixed unions, that is of a Brahmin female with a Shudra
male. Kautilya agrees with the Dharmashutra writers and he says that people
born out of mixed unions were separate castes. He recommends that marriage
between different castes should not be allowed and people of such unions
should be treated as Shudra.
Manu, the earliest law giver, has very explicitly talked about a caste called
svapathas, who were grouped with Chandalas and were prescribed to live
outside the villages, use of shrouds of corpses as their clothing, broken pot-
for meal, iron for ornaments and dogs and donkeys for their wealth. Mritapas
were also another type of Shudras. The food vessels of Chandalas and Mritapas
could not be used by others because no known method of cleaning pots was
regarded as adequate to purify them.
Patanjali, who lived before Manu the great grammarian, had said that both the
Chandalas and the Mritapas resided like other Shudras such as carpenters,
blacksmiths, washermen or weavers, within the limits of the towns and villages
of the Aryans. In the days of Manu they were not only excluded from the
village but were assigned duties of cremators or hangmen which were totally
unclean.
In about 1020 AD the Doms and Chandalas were two groups not reckoned
among any caste or guild. They were-occupied with works like cleaning of the
villages and similar other services. They were considered as one sole class and
were distinguished by their occupations. The first group of the Antyajas who
had further sub-divisions following certain crafts were totally eight in number.
They lived near villages, they were jugglers, basket and rope makers, sailors,
fishermen, and hunters of wild animals and birds. They could freely intermarry
though they belonged to separate caste groups. They could not marry with the
shoemakers and the weavers however. The shoemakers and weaver were
another group of Antyajas who could marry only among themselves. In the
past the untouchable castes as a whole were barred from any of the rituals.
They did not have any sanctity to perform or participate in any religious or
sacred ritual.
9
It was thought, that the untouchable is unclean by birth; he is born into a caste
every member of which, irrespective of birth or occupation, is an untouchable.
Identity, Dignity and Hinduism does not provide any means to him to become clean by the
Social Justice
performance of any ritual. They were assigned to their unclean task and never
allowed to come out of it. The main condition of their survival was the strict
observance of a code of conduct established for them. The bounds of which
they were not permitted to cross. Not only did they not have access to public
places, but they were not allowed any physical contact by their breath and
glance as well. The use of force occupied a main place in keeping the
untouchables in their place. Punishment for any breach of rule was mutilation
and even taking away life.
Another important explanation to the origins of untouchable caste has been
that of the materialists. According to the materialist untouchability grew out
of a social class who are in the lowest rung who did not possess the right of
holding and usage of land. These landless workers were semi-slaves and were
in debt bondage, who not only toiled on other pepole’s land but were forced to
carry on unclean occupations. They were secured by the social bondage and
by the concept of destiny or karma where they were ordained to be doomed to
sub-human living.
These castes are referred even today in different regions according to the dialects
and languages, which they speak. These people have occupied a very low
social and economic position in the caste and class hierarchies.
Besides, they were subjected to various types of social disabilities. For instance,
they were not allowed to enter the house of the higher castes. However, they
were allowed to work as labourers during construction or repair, stoning the
grain, etc. But later the houses so constructed were purified by sprinkling cow
urine or cow dungs. In the event of their touching the utensils and other non-
inflammables, these things were to be put on fire and then purified by sprinkling
cow urine. They were also not allowed to walk on streets or public roads, or
enter the temples, or heard in the court of justice. These practices have remained
inherent part of the Hindu caste society. Such disabilities of the Scheduled
Castes have posed tremendous obstacles for their progress as well as of the
society as a whole.
The segregation based on occupation has slowly narrowed down and instead it
is primarily based on birth in the low castes. Even if the person is not engaged
in the traditional occupations but since he/she is born into the caste, it became
his/her status and position in the society. On the basis of their birth in the low
castes, untouchables were always pushed into the background and their socio-
economic contribution was never recognised in the history. Manu had always
proclaimed superiority of the Brahmins which closed the channels of upward
social mobility for any other castes and the worst affected groups were the
untouchables. Even today the Scheduled Castes lag behind the upper castes in
almost all fields and they undergo hardships, sufferings and oppression by the
upper castes.
It can be seen from the preceding discussion that various justifications, reasons
have gone into placing the Scheduled Castes in a exploitative situation and
that this exploitation has gone on for centuries. Modern India realised a need
to redress this marginalised state of the Scheduled Caste. In our next section.
We will examine the various measures, which are institutionally provided to
10 improve the status of Scheduled Castes.
Check Your Progress 1 Scheduled Castes
Buddhism. The Militant Mahar youth organised the Dalit Panther Movement
Identity, Dignity and in 1942 because the religious conversion did not make any significant change
Social Justice
in their socio-economic condition. Now, the scheduled castes are involved in
civil rights movements, students movements in the university and college
campuses, and also in the ecological movements in many regions. Thus, they
are collectivity endorsing their identity in various ways to pave a brighter future
for themselves. The new identities of the scheduled castes are being accepted
by others. Because of their educational development and the westernisation
the practices of untouchability and discrimination against them are slowly
becoming less. The welfare and developmental measures undertaken for the
improvement in their economic position and upliftment of their social status
have been responsible for opening new vistas for the depressed classes. In
spite of all these, we cannot say for certain that the Scheduled Castes are
enjoying an equal status at par with the others. Their present generation has
just set the stage for development and we can hope that the Scheduled Castes
would acquire a new and a positive identity vis-a-vis rest of the castes and
communities in years to come.
A few more untouchable castes left Hinduism and developed their own separate
religion. The Chamars and Chuhars of Punjab formed the Adi Dharm which
believed that they were not part of the Hindu caste system. Later, the followers
of Adi Dharm were politically aligned and absorbed in Ambedkar’s Scheduled
Caste Federation in the late 1940s. Some Untouchables followed Christianity,
Islam or Buddhism, and all those who were converted to Christianity or Islam
did not make any attempts to sanskritise them. The classic case is of the Nadars
of Tirunelvelli in Tamil Nadu who converted to Christianity. However, all
those who have become Christians have not ceased to be untouchables. Caste
differentiation has permeated itself even within the Church.The economic
differentiation between the Pulaya Christian (traditional untouchables) and
the Syrian Christians in Kerala still persists. Earlier, the Syrian Christians
considered themselves to be more superior to Pulaya Christians in terms of
education and employment. But now their situation is gradually improving.
K.C. Alexander who has made a noteworthy study of social mobility among
the Pulaya Christians has observed the Pulayas who now are university
graduates and who are employed in white collar jobs are rarely treated as
untouchables.
Check Your Progress 2
1) The scheduled castes are:
a) Kshatriyas
b) Brahmins
c) Shudras
d) Untouchables outside the four-fold division of various systems or
the caste system.
2) Antyajas was referred in the Writing of ..................
3) Which of the statements is right? Put a (9)mark in front of the correct
statement:
i) Untouchables do not constitute a homogeneous group.
ii) Ambedkar called the untouchables Harijans.
20
iii) Sanskritisation is process of alienation.
Scheduled Castes
21.5 LET US SUM UP
We have analysed the problems of the Scheduled Castes from the very early
times till date. We have seen how untouchability as a phenomenon is inherent
in the caste-ridden Hindu society and social mobility for the untouchables is
hampered because of their low caste status.
The Scheduled Castes are slowly trying to recover from their disabilities of
untouchability of and discrimination. We have seen that there are a number of
constitutional provisions made for them in the independent India. We have
looked at the operational inconsistencies of the governmental measures adopted
for enhancement of the status of the Scheduled Caste. We have also the possible
measures to be adopted and properly implemented for a better future of the
depressed sections of the people in India.
21
Identity, Dignity and
Social Justice 21.7 FURTHER READINGS
Singh, Yogendra. 1980, Social Stratification and Change in India, Manohar,
New Delhi.
Benjamin, Joseph. 1989, Scheduled Castes in Indian Politics and Society, ECS
Publications
Kamble N.D. 1982, The Scheduled Castes, Ashish Publishing House, New
Delhi.
Ghurye G.S. 1969, Caste and Race in India, Popular Prakashan, Bombay.
22
UNIT 22 SCHEDULED TRIBES
Structure
22.0 Objectives
22.1 Introduction
22.2 Definition of Tribe and Scheduled Tribe
22.2.1 The Tribe
22.2.2 The Scheduled Tribes
22.3 Demographic Profile of the Tribes
22.3.1 Geographical Zones
22.3.2 Racial Affinities
22.3.3 Linguistic Affnities
22.4 Tribal Economy
22.4.1 Hunting and Food Gathering Tribes
22.4.2 Pastoral and Cattle Herding Tribes
22.4.3 Cultivators
22.4.4 Simple Artisans
22.4.5 Labour : Agricultural and Non-agricultural
22.4.6 The Skilled White-collar job Holders and Traders
22.5 Tribe, Land and Forest
22.5.1 Land and Agrarian Situation
22.5.2 Forest and Forest Produce
22.6 Tribes and Education
22.6.1 Literacy Rates
22.6.2 Problems of Education
22.7 Tribal Movement
22.8 Approaches to the Tribal Development
22.9 Let Us Sum Up
22.10 Key Words
22.11 Further Readings
22.12 Answers to Check Your Progress
22.0 OBJECTIVES
After reading this unit you should be able to :
z Explain who are tribes and what makes them different from non-tribes;
z Relate the occupation of tribes within the environment that they live;
z Understand the problems of tribes within the environment that they live;
and
z Analysis the various ways in which their problems are being tackled.
23
Identity, Dignity and
Social Justice 22.1 INTRODUCTION
In the previous unit of this block you have acquainted yourself with the problems
of Scheduled Castes. In this unit we shall be talking about the problems of
Scheduled Tribes.
To understand the problems of Scheduled Tribe we think it necessary to define
tribes in terms of their general characteristics and to explain what is meant by
Scheduled Tribes. We shall also describe the constitutional safeguards which
are provided to them. The unit also discusses their demographic profile with
regard to geographical area, racial and linguistic affinities. Next we will try to
understand their economic pursuits and their relationships with regard to land
and forest. We will also discuss their educational status and show how the low
rate of literacy is contributory factor for their exploitation. Tribal struggles
and movements are manifestations and vent to their frustration. In the end, the
unit presents the various opinions as to what should be the proper approach to
their development.
22.4.3 Cultivators
Agriculture among the tribes is of simple and poor nature. They do cultivation
at subsistence level and are unable to meet their minimum daily needs. In the
low-lying land, raising paddy crops is easy as artificial irrigation is not needed.
In the uplands only coarser varieties of rice as well as pulses, millets and other
products of minor value are grown. Their agricultural implements are
indigenous and made by local ironsmiths. A few tribes use cow dung manure
as well.
An important characteristic of tribal agriculture is cooperation seen at the time
of transplanting of paddy and on other occasions. Help is rendered among the
relatives or among the villagers or among the people of an area reciprocal
basis. Some prominent agriculturist tribes are Khasis and Jaintias of Meghalaya;
Khasas (Jaunsaris) and Tharus of Uttar Pradesh; Kinnauras, Pangwals and
Swanglas of Himachal Pradesh; Bhumijs, Koras, Bhuiyas, Santhals, Mundas,
Oraons, Hos, Kharwars, Baigas, Gonds, etc., in middle India; Bhils, Meenas,
30
Garasias, Damarias, Koli Mahadevs, Varlis, Thakurs, Korkus, Dublas, etc.,
in western India; Koyas of Andhra Pradesh; Malayalis of Tamil Nadu and so
on.
Besides these plain cultivators, there are the hill cultivators who are -engaged Scheduled Tribes
in shifting cultivation. Hill cultivation is a seasonally regulated sequence of
procedure designed to open up and bring under cultivation a patch of forest
land. After one or two seasons of staple cropping the plot is left fallow for
years together with a view to restoring fertility of the soil through forest growth.
Following this the plot is again cleared and vegetations are burnt and another
cycle of cultivation begins. Hill cultivation goes under a variety of names:
Jhum in North-East, Kurwa or Khallu in Santhat Paraganas, Bewara in Ranchi
and Palamau in Bihar, Podu, Rema, Dahi, Kaman, Bringa, Gudia, Dongarchas
in Orissa, Penda, Dahiya, Biwar, iguharh, Farhha, Dippa, Marhan or Erka in
Madhya Pradesh, Kondapady in Andhra Pradesh.
Approximately more than 6 takh Scheduled Tribe families are engaged in
shifting cultivation covering about 10 million hectares of land. Tribal people
inhabiting in the hill forests of all the seven states in the North-East, Bihar,
Orissa, Madhya Pradesh and Andhra Pradesh are dependent on hill cultivation
for their livelihood. These tribes include Garos, Tripuris, Noatias., a few
Halams and Riangs, Chakmas, Mags and Nagas with their different
nomencatures in the North-East, Malers or Sauria Paharias of Santhal
Paraganas, Hill Kharias and a few Korwas, Parhaiyas and Birjias in Bihar,
Saoras and Kutia Kandhs in Orissa, Kamars, Baigas and Maria Gonds in
Madhya Pradesh, Konda Dhoras and Nooka or Mukha Dhoras and a few
Bagatas in Andhra Pradesh and Malaikudis in Karnataka.
41
Identity, Dignity and K.S. Singh, 1972. The Tribal Situation in India, Mohanlal Banarasi Dass: Simla.
Social Justice
43
UNIT 23 MINORITIES
Structure
23.0 Objectives
23.1 Introduction
23.2 The Problem of Minorities in the Contemporary World
23.2.1 The Dimensions of the Problem
23.2.2 Who are the Minorities?
23.3 Approaches to the Minority Problem
23.3.1 Assimilation
23.3.2 Discrimination and Annihilation
23.3.3 Tolerance and Equality
23.4 Minorities and the Politico-linguistic Variations
23.5 Minority Rights in Modern India
23.5.1 Equality for Minorities
23.5.2 Controversies over Minority Rights
23.6 Let Us Sum Up
23.7 Key Words
23.8 Further Readings
23.9 Answers to Check Your Progress
23.0 OBJECTIVES
This unit deals with the problem of minorities in India and also minorities in
contemporary societies the world over. The study of this unit should enable
you to:
z understand the conceptual and the theoretical explanations of minority;
z analyse the rights of minorities and the need for that; and
z discuss the problem of minorities in the contemporary Indian society.
23.1 INTRODUCTION
We have discussed in the previous unit, the problem of Scheduled Tribe which
is a problem essentially of the disparities and deprivations. The problem of
minorities is also similar to that of many tribal groups. The minorities, because,
of their relatively less numerical strength feel that their rights are persistently
ignored. This unit discusses how minorities have emerged and the problems
they face and also their rights. We will also talk about the social composition
and rights of minorities and the constitutional provisions for them in India.
23.3.1 Assimilation
The issue of minority and majority has been going on for centuries. Earlier the
problem was seen as one of the conflict: of religions and ethnic groups. These
days the problem is essentially related to national minorities. The concept of
nation assumes that political boundaries must coincide with the characteristic
of people living within it. A nation state prefers if possible a homogenous
religion, language, ethnic identity etc. In the words of Clude “The rise of the
problem of minorities was a logical consequence of the ascendancy of
nationalism. It is injected into politics ... the principle that the state should be
nationally homogeneous and a nation should be politically united.” (Clude,
1955. p. 81). This gave rise to unrestricted control over given territory,
uniformity of laws, languages, customs etc., irrespective of differences.
Homogeneity is never a reality thus there are constant efforts by the majority
to assimilate the minority. The minorities are made to abandon their ethnic,
religious cultural and linguistic characteristics which differentiate them from
the dominant group. For instance in the erstwhile Soviet Union, this kind of
homogeneity was imposed with the interntent of making the national state
secure and its institutions stable. The welfare and security of the state were
primary consideration. As a result the minority considerations were sidelined.
It was not long before the various majority ethnic groups realised this kind of
subjugation and fought for their rights.
The assimilation of heterogenous groups through coercion is not so bluntly
adopted, states now prefer adopting other indirect methods. Discrimination is
one such method.
...................................................................................................................
Identity, Dignity and ...................................................................................................................
Social Justice
...................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................
23.7 KEYWORDS
Consensus : Agreement in opinion of all people concerned.
Differentiated : To cause difference or to change what was
similar between things or people.
Dominant : A dominant group is one which exercises control
over other groups.
Discrimination : To treat one with difference and prejudice.
Genocide : A deliberate extermination of group or a race.
The extermination of Jews by the Germans
during Hitler’s regime is a good example of
genocide.
Segregation : To keep apart, to isolate a group from others.
Utilitarian : Concerned with looking at the usefulness of a
thing.
56
UNIT 24 ETHNICITY
Structure
24.0 Objectives
24.1 Introduction
24.2 Ethnicity : The Problem, Definition and Identity
24.2.1 The Problem of Ethnicity
24.2.2 Definition of Ethnicity
24.2.3 Ethnic Identity : A Psycho-Sociological Reality
24.3 Ethnicity : The Various Perspectives of Analysis
24.3.1 Perspectives on Ethnicity
24.3.2 Some Characteristics of Ethnicity
24.3.3 Latent and Manifest Identities
24.4 Pluralities and Larger Identity
24.4.1 Quest for a Larger Identity
24.4.2 The Emergence of India as a Nation
24.5 Deprivation, Disparity and the State’s Response
24.5.1 Regional and Ethnic Identities
24.5.2 Jharkhand Movement as an Example
24.5.3 The Indian State’s Response
24.6 Let Us Sum Up
24.7 Key Words
24.8 Further Readings
24.9 Answers to Check Your Progress
24.0 OBJECTIVES
After reading this unit, you should. be able to:
z understand what the term ethnicity means;
z explain various perspectives on ethnicity;
z analyse the major reasons for the emergence of an ethnic movement; and
z relate it to various factors which come into play.
24.1 INTRODUCTION
In the previous unit, you read about the problems of minorities. In this unit, we
will get to know about ethnicity, a phenomenon which has become a thorny
issue. This unit will start with the definition of ethnicity and outline some of
the perspectives on ethnicity. We will also be explaining the importance of
identity for a group which provides an ethnic movement the impetus and a
motive. Towards the end of the unit we will explain to you how ethnicity is
greatly shaped by disparities and deprivations; a modern problem of
development initiatives.
57
Identity, Dignity and
Social Justice 24.2 ETHNICITY: THE PROBLEM, DEFINITION
AND IDENTITY
You must have heard the word ethnicity or ethnic problems. The word ethnicity
comes from the root word ethnic which loosely means race. An ethnic
community does not strictly have a racial connotation. A community can be
distinct from others in many ways: their racial stock or origin being one of
them. A community may distinguish itself from others by way of a particular
or distinctive culture, language, religion or a combination of all these. Because
of this distinctive aspect the ethnic communities often come in conflict with
other communities with whom they come in contact.
In this section we will understand this problem of ethnicity by first
understanding what ethnicity means and the nature of identity of ethnic
communities.
What can be gathered from the above is that state is essentially accommodative
of some of the ethnic demands. This has diffused the ethnic tension and conflicts
in the country. And in some sense this enhanced the mobility and bargaining
power of the ethnic group.
The post-Independent India has seen a lot of changes. We have made some
new strides in development activity. Amidst this, there have emerged new
classes and groups which have asserted for their separate identity and have
enabled them to claim a larger share in the fruits of development. They have
also realised that in a federal political structure like ours, which has a strong
central state. the best way of carving out more power is to capture power at the
state level.
Soon after Independence the most powerful manifestation of ethnicity in India
was the demand for creation of state or province on linguistic basis. The State
Reorganisation Committee was formed in 1956 and boundaries of the states
were redrawn on the linguistic basis. This forming of linguistic states was a
manifestation of ethnic identity. This process reinforced the regional and
linguistic identity and ethnicity. Thus, the demand for separate state on various
accounts like ethnicity, language, etc. soon became a part of the political
scenario. Various political parties were formed at the state level which were,
by and large, identified with ethnic elements.
68
References
REFERENCES
Anderson, B., 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and
Spread of Nationalism, Verso: London.
Ansari, Iqbal A., 1989. The Muslim Situation in India, Sterling : New Delhi.
Bailey F.G., 1960. Tribe Caste and Nation : A Study of Political Activity an
Political Change in Highland Orissa, Manchester University Press:
Manchester.
Banton Michael, 1983. Ethnicity, Ethnic Group, Macmillan Student
Encyclopedia of Sociology, (In Michael Mann, ed.) Macmillan Press: London.
Barth, F. (ed.), 1969. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries : The Social Organization
of Cultural Differences, Little Brown: Boston.
Barun De and Sunanjan Das, 1992. Ethnic Revivalism : Problems in the Indian
Union in S. K. Singh (ed.). Ethnicity Caste and People, Manohar New Delhi.
Benjamin, Joseph. 1989, Scheduled Castes in Indian Politics and Society, ECS
Publications
Bentley, G. Carter, 1983. ‘Theoretical Perspectives on Ethnicity and
Nationalism’. Sage Race Relations Abstacts. VIII(3) 1-53.
Berghe, Van den., 1976. ‘Ethnic Pluralism in Industrial Societies’. Ethnicity
232-55.
Beteille, Andre (ed.) 1969, Social Inequality : Selected Readings, Penguin:
New Delhi.
Brass, Paul, 1992. Ethnicity and Nationalism: Theory and Comparison, Sage:
New Delhi.
Clude, L., 1955. National States and National Minorities, H.U.P.
Fuchs, S., 1972. ‘Land Scarcity and Land Hunger Among Some Aboriginal
Tribes of Western Central India’ in S.K.Singh (ed.) Tribal Situation in India.
Shimla.
Furnivall, J.S. 1953, Colonial Policy and Practice, Cambridge University Press:
Cambridge
Galser N. and D.P. Moynihan: 1975. ‘Ethnicity’, Harvard.
Geertz, Clifford (ed.), 1983. Old Societies and New States, Free Press: New
York.
Ghurye G.S. 1969, Caste and Race in India, Popular Prakashan: Bombay.
Ghurye, G.S., 1983. The Scheduled Tribes, Popular Book Depot : Bombay.
Gopal, S., 1992. Ethnicity, Nationality and Nationalism in S.K. Singh (ed.)
Ethnicity Caste and People. Manohar : New Delhi.
Gupta, Dipankar, 1991. Communalism and Fundamentalism Some Notes on
the Ethnic Polities in India. EPW, March.
Hutton, J.H. 1931. Census of India 193.1, Vol. I, Part IIIB. Ethnographic Notes,
Government Press : Shimla. 69
Kabir, Humayun. 1968, Minorities in a Democracy, Firma KLM.
Identity, Dignity and Kamble N.D. 1982, The Scheduled Castes, Ashish Publishing House: New
Social Justice
Delhi.
K.S. Singh, 1972. The Tribal Situation in India, Mohanlal Banarasi Dass: Simla.
Majumdar, D.N. and Madan, N., 1956. An Introduction to Social Anthropology.
Asian Publishing House: Bombay.
Majumdar, D.N. 1958. Races and Cultures of India, Asian Publishing House:
Bombay.
Mendelbaum, David G., 1970. Society in India. Popular Prakashan : Bombay
Nair, K.S., 1985. ‘Ethnicity Identity and Integration’ in A.D. Pant and Shiva
K. Gupta (ed.). Ethnicity and National Integration. Vohra : Allahabad
Phadnis, Urmilla, 1989. Ethnicity and National Building in South Asia, Sage:
New Delhi.
Shakir, Moin. 1980, Politics of Minorities, Ajanta: Delhi
Singh K.S. (ed.) 1992, Ethnicity Caste and People, Manohar : New Delhi.
Singh, S.K. (ed.), 1972. Tribal Situation in India .IIAS: Shimla.
Singh, Yogendra. 1980, Social Stratification and Change in India, Manohar,
New Delhi.
70