Writing A Level Maths C3 coursework can be a challenging task, requiring a deep understanding of
the subject matter, strong analytical and problem-solving skills, and the ability to communicate
complex mathematical concepts effectively. The coursework typically involves investigating a
specific mathematical problem or topic, applying relevant theories and formulas, and presenting the
findings in a structured and coherent manner.
Students often face difficulties in selecting a suitable topic, formulating a clear hypothesis, and
conducting a thorough analysis. The mathematical nature of the coursework demands precision and
accuracy, leaving little room for errors. Additionally, the need for extensive research, data collection,
and interpretation can add to the complexity.
While some students may enjoy the process of delving into mathematical problems and deriving
solutions, others may find it overwhelming. Time management is crucial, as the coursework requires
a significant investment of time and effort to meet the academic standards.
For those who find themselves struggling with the coursework or facing tight deadlines, seeking
assistance from reputable sources can be a viable option. ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ is one such
platform that offers academic writing services. By ordering assistance from experienced
professionals, students can ensure that their A Level Maths C3 coursework is well-researched,
structured, and meets the necessary academic criteria.
However, it's essential to approach such services with caution, ensuring that the chosen platform
adheres to academic integrity standards and provides original, plagiarism-free content. While
external help can be valuable, it's crucial for students to actively engage in the learning process and
understand the concepts presented in their coursework.
In conclusion, writing A Level Maths C3 coursework can be challenging, and students facing
difficulties may consider seeking assistance from reputable academic writing services like ⇒
HelpWriting.net ⇔. However, it's crucial to maintain academic integrity and use such services
responsibly, ensuring a genuine understanding of the coursework's content.
But with Computers being able to do even that, it makes it even easier to use it. Similarly to before, I
used excel to work out the value of f(x). Despite this, it is a very effective method as failure chances
are relatively very low and the root can be found to many decimal places if the right software is
used. As a result of this no change of sign will be found using the method above and so the root will
not be found. I repeat this until I get down to increments the size of 0.00001. After 19 iterations, I
found the root of the equation as from then on, it repeats. As the function f(x) is continuous, a
change of sign will always indicate a root. Hide replies Empty reply does not make any sense for the
end user Submit reply Cancel jbenj10 9 years ago report 5 Thank you - Very clear notes to introduce
functions. With the use of AutoGraph Software, It is even easier as you don’t even have to work out
the gradient function. This is not accurate enough as I want it to be to 5 decimal places. Upload
Read for free FAQ and support Language (EN) Sign in Skip carousel Carousel Previous Carousel
Next What is Scribd. See other similar resources ?3.25 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for
later Not quite what you were looking for. Some methods give you the exact and precise answer but
usually are harder and more complex. The value of g(x) at this point is then taken as the next guess
and this process is repeated to converge on the root. If we take a look at the Newton Raphson
formula, it’s denominator is the gradient function of f(x). Show replies SRWhitehouse 7 years ago
Glad to hear that you find the resources useful. Full description Save Save C3 MEI A-level Maths
Coursework For Later 100% 100% found this document useful, Mark this document as useful 0%
0% found this document not useful, Mark this document as not useful Embed Share Print Download
now Jump to Page You are on page 1 of 18 Search inside document. Our customer service team will
review your report and will be in touch. ?0.00 (no rating) 0 reviews Download Save for later ?0.00
(no rating) 0 reviews Download Save for later Last updated 22 February 2018 Share this Share
through email Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share through facebook Share through
pinterest JChamboredon's Shop 3.78 9 reviews Not the right resource. EAWK 4 years ago report 4
Thanks so much for this resource. See other similar resources ?0.00 4.50 24 reviews Download Save
for later Not quite what you were looking for. Compared to the change of sign method both are
generally more easy to use as once the initial formula has been entered it is very quick and simple to
do the iterations many times. This makes it particularly useful if computer software is not available.
The questions on proof are well organized but the solution sheet is not very clear. Writing the formula
in a cell and dragging it down so it is easier to calculate the y values for various points of x. I am
going to use the inbuilt function in AutoGraph to work it out initially and then I will use Excel to
work the root out to more decimal places. The Decimal search method enables you to get a very close
approximate to the real solution but more easily. Write a review Update existing review Submit
review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback. There isn’t any iteration and rearrangement
involved in the formulae and it is very easy to enter all the information into Excel. So using the Re-
arrangement method to solve f(x), I find that the root is - 1.961703555. The integer search process of
finding this interval is shown for the two bounds here-.
For example sing the same rearrangement of the equation to find the root between 5 and 6 using 5 as
the starting point, the iterations converge on the root between 1 and 2. Care must be taken when
choosing a starting value and asymptotes can cause the method to fail. Also, if the too roots are too
close together, we might miss the other two a fter finding the first one. But with ever growing
technology, there might already be software that solves the roots of an equation after entering the
formula in. The reason is that it only involves a few calculations and it is easy to calculate them.
Detailed PowerPoint resources for AS and A2 Mathematics,C1,2,3 and 4. Empty reply does not
make any sense for the end user Submit reply Cancel danielsdafe 7 years ago report 5 I only
downloaded the introduction to functions which was very well structured with activities plus
answers. So when I substitute the incremented values of x between -10 and 0 into the equation, I get
the following results. Regarding the speed the convergence, this is by far the fastest to converge to
the root and it is also the method which fails the least out of the three different methods. The
questions on proof are well organized but the solution sheet is not very clear. But among the three
methods, I think change of signs method should be chosen as the easiest and quickest one. See other
similar resources ?3.25 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what you were
looking for. So I used the formula to work out the values in excel. This resource hasn't been
reviewed yet To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have purchased this resource can
review it Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions. Upload Read for
free FAQ and support Language (EN) Sign in Skip carousel Carousel Previous Carousel Next What
is Scribd. This makes it much easier than excel but it is again less accurate as it only gives the root to
3 decimal places where as excel can be configured to as many decimal places as needed. Empty reply
does not make any sense for the end user Submit reply Cancel nishilamin1234 4 years ago report 5
Found it well organised Empty reply does not make any sense for the end user Submit reply Cancel
pkempner 4 years ago report 5 Great resource on a topic that many students ignore. Show replies
SRWhitehouse 7 years ago Glad to hear that you find the resources useful. Compared to the change
of sign method both are generally more easy to use as once the initial formula has been entered it is
very quick and simple to do the iterations many times. This reason is that the two points are too close
to each other. It will explore instances where, for some reason, they fail and also examine their ease,
efficiency and usefulness in solving polynomial equations. I repeat this until I get down to
increments the size of 0.00001. This method is slightly complex even on easy formulas, but when we
get really complicated when harder formulas are introduced. Thank you for sharing Show replies
SRWhitehouse 7 years ago Glad it was useful. A pdf file containing 20 random questions to revise
topics for Core and Core 4 maths (A level). Similarly to before, I used excel to work out the value of
f(x). Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch. ?7.00 (no rating) 0
reviews BUY NOW Save for later ?7.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last
updated 17 January 2017 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share through
linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest Tamaholic's Shop 4.75 4 reviews Not the
right resource. The value of g'(x) at this point is far greater than 1, so the iterations do not converge.
A decimal search, in contrast, just requires calculations, which can easily be done using a computer.
Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch. ?0.00 4.70 11 reviews
Download Save for later ?0.00 4.70 11 reviews Download Save for later Last updated 23 March
2017 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share through
facebook Share through pinterest SRWhitehouse's Resources 4.60 2216 reviews Not the right
resource. Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some
feedback. This makes it much easier than excel but it is again less accurate as it only gives the root to
3 decimal places where as excel can be configured to as many decimal places as needed. EAWK 4
years ago report 4 Thanks so much for this resource. This process is then repeated on the new x
values until they converge on the root to the required level of accuracy. Regarding the speed the
convergence, this is by far the fastest to converge to the root and it is also the method which fails the
least out of the three different methods. To start the process, we have to select two points on the
graph visual basis. This is the only hard part of the method as the iterative part of the method is very
simple with the use of the formula. The questions on proof are well organized but the solution sheet
is not very clear. After finding the roots, we can leave Autograph and use Excel to proof the rest of
the change of signs method. So I used the formula to work out the values in excel. So when I
substitute the incremented values of x between -10 and 0 into the equation, I get the following
results. Show replies SRWhitehouse 7 years ago Glad to hear that you find the resources useful. But
with ever growing technology, there might already be software that solves the roots of an equation
after entering the formula in. In some cases you may not be able to differentiate f(x). A pdf file
containing 20 random questions to revise topics for Core and Core 4 maths (A level). Also, using
change of signs method with graphic can guarantee that the method should be worked; it seems it
takes a bit longer than other methods, though. This resource hasn't been reviewed yet To ensure
quality for our reviews, only customers who have purchased this resource can review it Report this
resource to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions. It will explore instances where, for
some reason, they fail and also examine their ease, efficiency and usefulness in solving polynomial
equations. Similarly to before, I used excel to work out the value of f(x). Out of the three, some are
faster at converging to the root that others and some are easier to use than others, especially with the
recent technology made available to everyone. Empty reply does not make any sense for the end user
Submit reply Cancel jenifer3 4 years ago report 5 Thank you for the effort of helping us for free.
Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback.
Therefore, we might miss the other two after finding the first one. But among the three methods, I
think change of signs method should be chosen as the easiest and quickest one. Empty reply does
not make any sense for the end user Submit reply Cancel danielsdafe 7 years ago report 5 I only
downloaded the introduction to functions which was very well structured with activities plus
answers. I use the Introduction sheet every time I teach functions and it always works well. This
repeats until we find the root of the equation, (when x value starts repeating or reached enough
significant levels). C3 Coursework - different methods of solving equations. This reason is that the
two points are too close to each other.
With the use of excel, it can be really easy to work out the values of y when you sub in the x values.
So this means that there will be no sign changes resulting in the failure of the graph. As for the speed
of convergence, it would be slower that Newton Raphson because of the extra time needed to re-
arrange the equation but it is faster than Decimal search. But after the 4 th iteration, we have reached
a point where the x value started repeating due to the fact that this was to 4 decimal places. C3
Coursework - different methods of solving equations. This makes it very easy to work out the
repetitive part of the method and makes the speed of convergence much faster. Empty reply does not
make any sense for the end user Submit reply Cancel nishilamin1234 4 years ago report 5 Found it
well organised Empty reply does not make any sense for the end user Submit reply Cancel pkempner
4 years ago report 5 Great resource on a topic that many students ignore. Empty reply does not make
any sense for the end user Submit reply Cancel See more Report this resource to let us know if it
violates our terms and conditions. So using the Re- arrangement method to solve f(x), I find that the
root is - 1.961703555. To start the process, we have to select two points on the graph visual basis.
Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback. This
method is slightly complex even on easy formulas, but when we get really complicated when harder
formulas are introduced. This resource hasn't been reviewed yet To ensure quality for our reviews,
only customers who have purchased this resource can review it Report this resource to let us know if
it violates our terms and conditions. After finding the roots, we can leave Autograph and use Excel
to proof the rest of the change of signs method. See other similar resources ?7.00 (no rating) 0
reviews BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what you were looking for. Empty reply does not make
any sense for the end user Submit reply Cancel jenifer3 4 years ago report 5 Thank you for the effort
of helping us for free. Empty reply does not make any sense for the end user Submit reply Cancel
neokleousstavri 4 years ago report 5 Thank you Empty reply does not make any sense for the end
user Submit reply Cancel See more Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and
conditions. Care must be taken when choosing a starting value and asymptotes can cause the method
to fail. Then we look at where the tangent crosses the X axis and that value will be the new x value
on the graph for a tangent. If so, I think that the decimal search will be the simplest way to find the
roots. With the use of excel, it is every easy to write down the formula of the method in one cell and
dragging it down as many cells as you wish to (the number of iterations) and it is very easy to use.
The integer search process of finding this interval is shown for the two bounds here-. This makes it
even easier than excel but it is less accurate as it only gives the root to 3 decimal places where as
excel can be configured to as many decimal places as needed. If that g’(x) 1, then we know that the
function will not converge to the root but will diverge away. Our customer service team will review
your report and will be in touch. ?0.00 4.50 24 reviews Download Save for later ?0.00 4.50 24
reviews Download Save for later Last updated 16 January 2018 Share this Share through email Share
through twitter Share through linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest phildb 4.02
936 reviews Not the right resource. Some computer programs, such as Autograph, can carry out the
iterations for you, which, if they are available to you, can make it easier to use than a decimal search.
Compared to the change of sign method both are generally more easy to use as once the initial
formula has been entered it is very quick and simple to do the iterations many times. When the line
met the curve, a tangent is drawn and extended until it meets the x-axis and it is a new point on the
x-axis, called X 3, which is equal to -3.5566. As a result of this no change of sign will be found using
the method above and so the root will not be found. The questions on proof are well organized but
the solution sheet is not very clear.
C3 Coursework - different methods of solving equations. Out of the three, some are faster at
converging to the root that others and some are easier to use than others, especially with the recent
technology made available to everyone. This is because the tangent crosses the asymptote, as shown
below. Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch. ?3.25 (no rating) 0
reviews BUY NOW Save for later ?3.25 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last
updated 23 November 2023 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share through
linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest Matthew O'Neil's Shop 4.19 16 reviews
Not the right resource. Also, using change of signs method with graphic can guarantee that the
method should be worked; it seems it takes a bit longer than other methods, though. Similarly to
before, I used excel to work out the value of f(x). Write a review Update existing review Submit
review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback. Thank you for sharing Show replies SRWhitehouse
7 years ago Glad it was useful. Full description Save Save C3 MEI A-level Maths Coursework For
Later 100% 100% found this document useful, Mark this document as useful 0% 0% found this
document not useful, Mark this document as not useful Embed Share Print Download now Jump to
Page You are on page 1 of 18 Search inside document. The fact that the solution lies between -3 and
-4 can also be seen in the graph. If the gradient function is zero, that will mean that the denominator
is 0 and that is an impossible fraction. See other similar resources ?7.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY
NOW Save for later Not quite what you were looking for. Writing the formula in a cell and dragging
it down so it is easier to calculate the y values for various points of x. Get this resource as part of a
bundle and save up to 20% A bundle is a package of resources grouped together to teach a particular
topic, or a series of lessons, in one place. As a result of this no change of sign will be found using the
method above and so the root will not be found. Despite this, it is a very effective method as failure
chances are relatively very low and the root can be found to many decimal places if the right
software is used. Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn. To start the process, we
have to select two points on the graph visual basis. After 19 iterations, I found the root of the
equation as from then on, it repeats. The integer search process of finding this interval is shown for
the two bounds here-. See other similar resources ?0.00 4.50 24 reviews Download Save for later Not
quite what you were looking for. Show replies SRWhitehouse 7 years ago Glad to hear that you find
the resources useful. When the line met the curve, a tangent is drawn and extended until it meets the
x-axis and it is a new point on the x-axis, called X 3, which is equal to -3.5566. This reason is that
the two points are too close to each other. Most of the mistakes are made in this stage by humans.
Empty reply does not make any sense for the end user Submit reply Cancel See more Report this
resource to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions. There isn’t any iteration and
rearrangement involved in the formulae and it is very easy to enter all the information into Excel.
What is more? There is a function of zooming in the graph in the graphic calculator, which makes it
easier to find out the values that correct to 5 decimal places. Write a review Update existing review
Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback.