0% found this document useful (0 votes)
97 views1 page

Barracuda vs FortiWeb WAF Comparison

The document compares the features of the Barracuda WAF and FortiWeb WAF. It finds that: - Barracuda WAF is classified as a challenger in Gartner reports, while FortiWeb is a niche player. - Both products provide protection against generic attacks, network attacks, DOS attacks, outbound data theft, policy evasion, file uploads, and support multiple deployment modes and common network protocols. - However, Barracuda provides stronger application layer protections, unlimited application support, OS/server fingerprinting prevention, application DDoS protection, and integrates with more security tools like SAST/DAST. FortiWeb has some application limitations and lacks some protections.

Uploaded by

mefot16939
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
97 views1 page

Barracuda vs FortiWeb WAF Comparison

The document compares the features of the Barracuda WAF and FortiWeb WAF. It finds that: - Barracuda WAF is classified as a challenger in Gartner reports, while FortiWeb is a niche player. - Both products provide protection against generic attacks, network attacks, DOS attacks, outbound data theft, policy evasion, file uploads, and support multiple deployment modes and common network protocols. - However, Barracuda provides stronger application layer protections, unlimited application support, OS/server fingerprinting prevention, application DDoS protection, and integrates with more security tools like SAST/DAST. FortiWeb has some application limitations and lacks some protections.

Uploaded by

mefot16939
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

S/N Features Barracuda WAF FortiWeb WAF

Product should fall in leader or challenger quadrant in


1 Challenger Niche Player
Gartner Magic Quadrant report for Web Application

2 Protection against Generic attacks Yes Yes

3 Protection against generic Network based attacks Yes Yes

4 Protection against Network layer DOS attacks-- Yes Yes

Protection against Application layer DoS attacks /Live


DDOS Preotection volumetric floods, stealthy
application-targeted
5 Yes No
strikes, and role/authentication-type strategies—in
hope of discovering vulnerabilities in an
organization’s defense.

6 Protection against outbound data theft Yes Yes

7 Protection against policy evasion attacks Yes Yes

8 Control over file uploads Yes Yes


9 Support multiple deployment modes Yes Yes

10 WAF capabilities to protect unlimited Application. Yes No(Application base Limitation)

11 Protocol support Yes Yes


12 SSL offloading support Yes Yes
13 Application Load balancing Yes Yes
14 Protection against Known exploits Yes Yes

15 Prevent OS and web server Fingerprinting-- Yes No

16 Supports common Network Protocols Yes Yes

Application level DDoS protection. Also includes


17 Yes No
volumetric DDoS prevention for applications

18 Protection against Buffer overflows Yes Yes


19 Virtual patching Yes Yes
20 Anti-Web defacement Yes Yes

21 Protection against business logic attacks Yes Yes

Protection against Known server and database


22 Yes No
vulnerability--

23 Protection against OWASP top 10 security risks Yes Yes

24 Integration with
25 LDAP/RADIUS/AD Yes Yes
26 Support for Certificates Yes Yes

27 Application security testing tools (SAST, DAST, IAST)-- Yes No

28 SIEM Yes Yes


29 IAM-- Yes Yes
30 Vulnerability Management tools Yes Yes

You might also like