Skip to main content

chrome_reader_modeEnter Reader Mode

Choose LanguageEnglishУкраїнська

1.
2.
Search Search
1. Sign in
2.
Contents
1. Home

2. Bookshelves

3. Industrial and Systems Engineering

4. Chemical Process Dynamics and Controls (Woolf)

5. 9: Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) Control

6. 9.2: P, I, D, PI, PD, and PID control

Expand/collapse global location
9.2: P, I, D, PI, PD, and PID control
1.

2. picture_as_pdf
Downloads
Submit Adoption ReportPeer ReviewDonate


 Ardemis Boghossian, James Brown, & Sara Zak
 University of Michigan
Introduction

Process controls are necessary for designing safe and productive plants. A variety of process
controls are used to manipulate processes, however the most simple and often most effective
is the PID controller. The controller attempts to correct the error between a measured
process variable and desired setpoint by calculating the difference and then performing a
corrective action to adjust the process accordingly. A PID controller controls a process
through three parameters: Proportional (P), Integral (I), and Derivative (D). These parameters
can be weighted, or tuned, to adjust their effect on the process.

Much more practical than the typical on/off controller, PID controllers allow for much better
adjustments to be made in the system. While this is true, there are some advantages to using
an on/off controller including that they are (1) relatively simple to design and execute and (2)
binary sensors and actuators (such as an on/off controller) are generally more reliable and less
expensive.

Although there are some advantages, there are large disadvantages to using an on/off
controller scheme. They are (1) inefficient (using this control is like driving with full gas and
full breaks), (2) can generate noise when seeking stability (can dramatically overshoot or
undershoot a set-point), and (3) physically wearing on valves and switches (continuously
turning valves/switches fully on and fully off causes them to become worn out much
quicker).

To allow for much better control and fine-tuning adjustments, most industrial processes use a
PID controller scheme. This section will provide a brief introduction on PID controllers as
well as methods to model a controlled system in Excel.

The Process Gain (K�) is the ratio of change of the output variable (responding variable) to
the change of the input variable (forcing function). It specifically defines the sensitivity of the
output variable to a given change in the input variable.

K=Δ Output Δinput�=Δ Output Δinput

Gain can only be described as a steady state parameter and give no knowledge about the
dynamics of the process and is independent of the design and operating variables. A gain has
three components that include the sign, the value, the units. The sign indicates how the output
responds to the process input. A positive sign shows that the output variable increases with an
increase in the input variable and a negative sign shows that the output variable decreases
with an increase in the input variable. The units depend on the process considered that depend
on the variables mentioned.

For example, the pressure was increased from 21 psi to 29 psi. This change increased the
valve position from 30% vp to 22% vp.

K=(29−21)psi(22−30)%vp=−1.0psi/(%vp)�=(29−21)���(22−30)%��=−1.0���/
(%��)

Dead Time (t0�0) is the between the change in an input variable and when the output
variable begins. Dead time is important because it effects the controllability of the control
system. A change in set point is not immediate because of this parameter. Dead time must be
considered in tuning and modeling processes.

Types of Control

Process controls are instruments used to control a parameter, such as temperature, level, and
pressure. PID controllers are a type of continuous controller because they continually adjust
the output vs. an on/off controller, when looking at feed forward or feed backward
conditions. An example of a temperature controller is shown in Figure 9.2.19.2.1.

Figure 9.2.19.2.1:
Temperature controller in a CSTR

As shown in Figure 1, the temperature controller controls the temperature of a fluid within a
CSTR (Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor). A temperature sensor first measures the
temperature of the fluid. This measurement produces a measurement signal. The
measurement signal is then compared to the set point, or desired temperature setting, of the
controller. The difference between the measured signal and set point is the error. Based on
this error, the controller sends an actuating signal to the heating coil, which adjusts the
temperature accordingly. This type of process control is known as error-based control
because the actuating signal is determined from the error between the actual and desired
setting. The different types of error-based controls vary in the mathematical way they
translate the error into an actuating signal, the most common of which are the PID
controllers. Additionally, it is critical to understand feed-forward and feed-back control
before exploring P, I, and D controls. Feed Forward Control Feedback Control

I, D, PI, PD, PID Control

As previously mentioned, controllers vary in the way they correlate the controller input
(error) to the controller output (actuating signal). The most commonly used controllers are
the proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controllers. PID controllers relate the error to
the actuating signal either in a proportional (P), integral (I), or derivative (D) manner. PID
controllers can also relate the error to the actuating signal using a combination of these
controls.

Proportional (P) Control

One type of action used in PID controllers is the proportional control. Proportional control is
a form of feedback control. It is the simplest form of continuous control that can be used in a
closed-looped system. P-only control minimizes the fluctuation in the process variable, but it
does not always bring the system to the desired set point. It provides a faster response than
most other controllers, initially allowing the P-only controller to respond a few seconds
faster. However, as the system becomes more complex (i.e. more complex algorithm) the
response time difference could accumulate, allowing the P-controller to possibly respond
even a few minutes faster. Although the P-only controller does offer the advantage of faster
response time, it produces deviation from the set point. This deviation is known as the offset,
and it is usually not desired in a process. The existence of an offset implies that the system
could not be maintained at the desired set point at steady state. It is analogous to the
systematic error in a calibration curve, where there is always a set, constant error that
prevents the line from crossing the origin. The offset can be minimized by combining P-only
control with another form of control, such as I- or D- control. It is important to note,
however, that it is impossible to completely eliminate the offset, which is implicitly included
within each equation.

P-control linearly correlates the controller output (actuating signal) to the error (diference
between measured signal and set point). This P-control behavior is mathematically illustrated
in Equation 9.2.19.2.1 (Scrcek, et. al).

c(t)=Kce(t)+b(9.2.1)(9.2.1)�(�)=���(�)+�

where

 c(t)�(�) = controller output

 Kc�� = controller gain
 e(t)�(�) = error
 b� = bias

In this equation, the bias and controller gain are constants specific to each controller. The bias
is simply the controller output when the error is zero. The controller gain is the change in the
output of the controller per change in the input to the controller. In PID controllers, where
signals are usually electronically transmitted, controller gain relates the change in output
voltage to the change in input voltage. These voltage changes are then directly related to the
property being changed (i.e. temperature, pressure, level, etc.). Therefore, the gain ultimately
relates the change in the input and output properties. If the output changes more than the
input, Kc will be greater than 1. If the change in the input is greater than the change in the
output, Kc will be less than 1. Ideally, if Kc is equal to infinity, the error can be reduced to
zero. However, this infinitesimal nature of Kc increases the instability of the loop because
zero error would imply that the the measured signal is exactly equal to the set point. As
mentioned in lecture, exact equality is never achieved in control logic; instead, in control
logic, error is allowed to vary within a certain range. Therefore, there are limits to the size
of Kc, and these limits are defined by the system. Graphical representations of the effects of
these variables on the system is shown in PID Tuning via Classical Methods.

As can be seen from the above equation, P-only control provides a linear relationship
between the error of a system and the controller output of the system. This type of control
provides a response, based on the signal that adjusts the system so that any oscillations are
removed, and the system returns to steady-state. The inputs to the controller are the set point,
the signal, and the bias. The controller calculates the difference between the set point and the
signal, which is the error, and sends this value to an algorithm. Combined with the bias, this
algorithm determines the action that the controller should take. A graphical representation of
the P-controller output for a step increase in input at time t0 is shown below in Figure 2. This
graph is exactly similar to the step input graph itself.
 Figure 2. P-controller output for step input.

To illustrate this linear P-control relationship, consider the P-only control that controls the
level of a fluid in a tank. Initially, the flow into the tank is equal to the flow out of the tank.
However, if the flow out of the tank decreases, the level in the tank will increase because
more fluid is entering than is leaving. The P-only control system will adjust the flow out of
the tank so that it is again equal to the flow into the tank, and the level will once again be
constant. However, this level is no longer equal to the initial level in the tank. The system is
at steady-state, but there is a difference between the initial set point and the current position
in the tank. This difference is the P-control offset.

Integral (I) Control

Another type of action used in PID controllers is the integral control. Integral control is a
second form of feedback control. It is often used because it is able to remove any deviations
that may exist. Thus, the system returns to both steady state and its original setting. A
negative error will cause the signal to the system to decrease, while a positive error will cause
the signal to increase. However, I-only controllers are much slower in their response time
than P-only controllers because they are dependent on more parameters. If it is essential to
have no offset in the system, then an I-only controller should be used, but it will require a
slower response time. This slower response time can be reduced by combining I-only control
with another form, such as P or PD control. I-only controls are often used when measured
variables need to remain within a very narrow range and require fine-tuning control. I
controls affect the system by responding to accumulated past error. The philosophy behind
the integral control is that deviations will be affected in proportion to the cumulative sum of
their magnitude. The key advantage of adding a I-control to your controller is that it will
eliminate the offset. The disadvantages are that it can destabilize the controller, and there is
an integrator windup, which increases the time it takes for the controller to make changes.

I-control correlates the controller output to the integral of the error. The integral of the error
is taken with respect to time. It is the total error associated over a specified amount of time.
This I-control behavior is mathematically illustrated in Equation 9.2.29.2.2 (Scrcek, et. al).

c(t)=1Ti∫e(t)dt+c(t0)(9.2.2)(9.2.2)�(�)=1��∫�(�)��+�(�0)

where

 c(t)�(�) is the controller output

 Ti�� is the integral time
 e(t)�(�) is the error
 c(t0)�(�0) is the controller output before integration
In Equation 9.2.29.2.2, the integral time is the amount of time that it takes for the controller
to change its output by a value equal to the error. The controller output before integration is
equal to either the initial output at time t=0, or the controller output at the time one step
before the measurement. Graphical representations of the effects of these variables on the
system is shown in PID Tuning via Classical Methods.

The rate of change in controller output for I-only control is determined by a number of
parameters. While the P-only controller was determined by e, the rate of change for I-only
depends on both e and Ti. Because of the inverse relationship between c(t) and Ti, this
decreases the rate of change for an I-only controller.

The I-only controller operates in essentially the same way as a P-only controller. The inputs
are again the set point, the signal, and the bias. Once again, the error is calculated, and this
value is sent to the algorithm. However, instead of just using a linear relationship to calculate
the response, the algorithm now uses an integral to determine the response that should be
taken. Once the integral is evaluated, the response is sent and the system adjusts accordingly.
Because of the dependence on Ti, it takes longer for the algorithm to determine the proper
response. A graphical representation of the I-controller output for a step increase in input at
time t0 is shown below in Figure 3. As expected, this graph represents the area under the step
input graph.

Figure 3. I-controller output for step input.

Derivative (D) Control

Another type of action used in PID controllers is the derivative control. Unlike P-only and I-
only controls, D-control is a form of feed forward control. D-control anticipates the process
conditions by analyzing the change in error. It functions to minimize the change of error, thus
keeping the system at a consistent setting. The primary benefit of D controllers is to resist
change in the system, the most important of these being oscillations. The control output is
calculated based on the rate of change of the error with time. The larger the rate of the change
in error, the more pronounced the controller response will be.

Unlike proportional and integral controllers, derivative controllers do not guide the system to
a steady state. Because of this property, D controllers must be coupled with P, I or PI
controllers to properly control the system.

D-control correlates the controller output to the derivative of the error. The derivative of the
error is taken with respect to time. It is the change in error associated with change in time.
This D-control behavior is mathematically illustrated in Equation 9.2.39.2.3 (Scrcek, et. al).

c(t)=Tddedt(9.2.3)(9.2.3)�(�)=������
where

 c(t)�(�) is the controller output

 Td�� is the derivative time constant
 de�� is the differential change in error
 dt�� is the differential change in time

Graphical representations of the effects of these variables on the system is shown in PID
Tuning via Classical Methods.

Mathematically, derivative control is the opposite of integral control. Although I-only

controls exist, D-only controls do not exist. D-controls measure only the change in error. D-
controls do not know where the setpoint is, so it is usually used in conjunction with another
method of control, such as P-only or a PI combination control. D-control is usually used for
processes with rapidly changing process outputs. However, like the I-control, the D control is
mathematically more complex than the P-control. Since it will take a computer algorithm
longer to calculate a derivative or an integral than to simply linearly relate the input and
output variables, adding a D-control slows down the controller’s response time. A graphical
representation of the D-controller output for a step increase in input at time t0�0 is shown
below in Figure 4. As expected, this graph represents the derivative of the step input graph.

Figure 4. D-controller output for step input.

Controller Effects on a System

The following images are intended to give a visual representation of how P, I, and D
controllers will affect a system.

Description

Figure 5. Stable data sample.

 Figure 6. Data disturbance. Figure

7. P-controller effect on data. Figure 8. I-controller effect on data.

Figure 9. D-controller effect on data.

Continue reading to see the results of combining controllers.

Proportional-Integral (PI) Control

One combination is the PI-control, which lacks the D-control of the PID system. PI control
is a form of feedback control. It provides a faster response time than I-only control due to the
addition of the proportional action. PI control stops the system from fluctuating, and it is also
able to return the system to its set point. Although the response time for PI-control is faster
than I-only control, it is still up to 50% slower than P-only control. Therefore, in order to
increase response time, PI control is often combined with D-only control.

PI-control correlates the controller output to the error and the integral of the error. This PI-
control behavior is mathematically illustrated in Equation 9.2.49.2.4 (Scrcek, et. al).

c(t)=Kc(e(t)+1Ti∫e(t)dt)+C(9.2.4)(9.2.4)�(�)=��(�(�)+1��∫�(�)��)+�

where

 c(t)�(�) is the controller output,

 Kc�� is the controller gain,
 Ti�� is the integral time,
 e(t)�(�) is the error, and
 C� is the initial value of controller

In this equation, the integral time is the time required for the I-only portion of the controller
to match the control provided by the P-only part of the controller.
The equation indicates that the PI-controller operates like a simplified PID-controller with a
zero derivative term. Alternatively, the PI-controller can also be seen as a combination of the
P-only and I-only control equations. The bias term in the P-only control is equal to the
integral action of the I-only control. The P-only control is only in action when the system is
not at the set point. When the system is at the set point, the error is equal to zero, and the first
term drops out of the equation. The system is then being controlled only by the I-only portion
of the controller. Should the system deviate from the set point again, P-only control will be
enacted. A graphical representation of the PI-controller output for a step increase in input at
time t0 is shown below in Figure 5. As expected, this graph resembles the qualitative
combination of the P-only and I-only graphs.

Figure 10. PI-controller output for step

input.

Effects of Kc and Ti

With a PI control system, controller activity (aggressiveness) increases as Kc and Ti decreases,

however they can act individually on the aggressiveness of a controller’s response. Consider
Figure 11 below with the center graph being a linear second order system base case.
 Figur
e 11. Effects of Kc and Ti [2]

The plot depicts how Ti and Kc both affect the performance of a system, whether they are both
affecting it or each one is independently doing so. Regardless of integral time, increasing
controller gain (moving form bottom to top on the plot) will increase controller activity.
Similarly, decreasing integral time (moving right to left on the plot) will increase controller
activity independent of controller gain. As expected, increasing Kc and decreasing Ti would
compound sensitivity and create the most aggressive controller scenario.

With only two interacting parameters in PI control systems, similar performance plots can
still cause confusion. For example, plots A and B from the figure both look very similar
despite different parameters being affected in each of them. This could cause further
problems and create a wildly aggressive system if the wrong parameter is being corrected.
While trial and error may be feasible for a PI system, it becomes cumbersome in PID where a
third parameter is introduced and plots become increasingly similar.

Another noteworthy observation is the plot with a normal Kc and double Ti. The plot depicts
how the proportional term is practical but the integral is not receiving enough weight initially,
causing the slight oscillation before the integral term can finally catch up and help the system
towards the set point.

Proportional-Derivative (PD) Control

Another combination of controls is the PD-control, which lacks the I-control of the PID
system. PD-control is combination of feedforward and feedback control, because it operates
on both the current process conditions and predicted process conditions. In PD-control, the
control output is a linear combination of the error signal and its derivative. PD-control
contains the proportional control’s damping of the fluctuation and the derivative control’s
prediction of process error.

As mentioned, PD-control correlates the controller output to the error and the derivative of
the error. This PD-control behavior is mathematically illustrated in Equation 5 (Scrcek, et.
al).

c(t)=Kc(e(t)+Tddedt)+C(9.2.5)(9.2.5)�(�)=��(�(�)+������)+�

where

 c(t) = controller output

 Kc = proportional gain
 e = error
 C = initial value of controller

The equation indicates that the PD-controller operates like a simplified PID-controller with a
zero integral term. Alternatively, the PD-controller can also be seen as a combination of the
P-only and D-only control equations. In this control, the purpose of the D-only control is to
predict the error in order to increase stability of the closed loop system. P-D control is not
commonly used because of the lack of the integral term. Without the integral term, the error
in steady state operation is not minimized. P-D control is usually used in batch pH control
loops, where error in steady state operation does not need to be minimized. In this
application, the error is related to the actuating signal both through the proportional and
derivative term. A graphical representation of the PD-controller output for a step increase in
input at time t0 is shown below in Figure 6. Again, this graph is a combination of the P-only
and D-only graphs, as expected.

Figure 12. PD-controller output for step input.

Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) Control

Proportional-integral-derivative control is a combination of all three types of control

methods. PID-control is most commonly used because it combines the advantages of each
type of control. This includes a quicker response time because of the P-only control, along
with the decreased/zero offset from the combined derivative and integral controllers. This
offset was removed by additionally using the I-control. The addition of D-control greatly
increases the controller's response when used in combination because it predicts disturbances
to the system by measuring the change in error. On the contrary, as mentioned previously,
when used individually, it has a slower response time compared to the quicker P-only control.
However, although the PID controller seems to be the most adequate controller, it is also the
most expensive controller. Therefore, it is not used unless the process requires the accuracy
and stability provided by the PID controller.

PID-control correlates the controller output to the error, integral of the error, and derivative of
the error. This PID-control behavior is mathematically illustrated in Equation 6 (Scrcek, et.
al).

c(t)=Kc(e(t)+1Ti∫e(t)dt+Tddedt)+C(9.2.6)(9.2.6)�(�)=��(�(�)
+1��∫�(�)��+������)+�

where

 c(t) = controller output

 Kc = controller gain
 e(t) = error
 Ti = integral time
 Td = derivative time constant
 C = intitial value of controller

As shown in the above equation, PID control is the combination of all three types of control.
In this equation, the gain is multiplied with the integral and derivative terms, along with the
proportional term, because in PID combination control, the gain affects the I and D actions as
well. Because of the use of derivative control, PID control cannot be used in processes where
there is a lot of noise, since the noise would interfere with the predictive, feedforward aspect.
However, PID control is used when the process requires no offset and a fast response time. A
graphical representation of the PID-controller output for a step increase in input at time t0 is
shown below in Figure 7. This graph resembles the qualitative combination of the P-only, I-
only, and D-only graphs.

Figure 7. PID-controller output for step input.

In addition to PID-control, the P-, I-, and D- controls can be combined in other ways. These
alternative combinations are simplifications of the PID-control.

Note: Order of e(t)

The order of the elements in the e(t) can vary depending on the situation. It could be the fixed
element minus the varying element or the other way around. To better illustrate the concept
let's go to an example. Let's say you are creating a PID control to control the fluid level in a
tank by manipulating the outlet valve. When the fluid level in the tank exceeds your set value,
you will want the valve to open up more to allow more flow out of the tank. You are looking
for a positive response. Therefore your e(t) should give a positive value when the fluid level
is higher than the set. In this case your e(t) will be (V-Vset). The same logic can be used for
other systems to determine what the e(t) should be in the PID controls.

Modeling PID Controllers With Euler in Excel

As with many engineering systems, PID controllers can be modeled in Excel via numerical
methods such as Euler's Method. First begin with the initial value for a given parameter.
Determine the change in that parameter at a certain time-step by summing the three
controllers P, I, and D at that step, which are found using the equations listed in the P, I, D,
PI, PD, PID Control section above. Take this change, multiply it by the chosen time-step and
add that to the previous value of the parameter of interest. For more detailed information see
Numerical ODE Solving in Excel. An example of a chemical engineering problem that uses
this method can be seen in Example 4 below.

Troubleshooting PID Modeling in Excel

When setting up an Excel spreadsheet to model a PID controller, you may receive an error
message saying that you have created a circular reference. Say you are controlling the flow
rate of one reactant (B�) to a reactor which is dependent upon the concentration of another
reactant (A�) already inside the reactor. Your PID equations look as follows:

FB=1+Kc[(A−Aset)+1τi∫(A−Aset)dt+τdd(A−Aset)dt]��=1+��[(�−�set)
+1��∫(�−�set)��+���(�−�set)��]

and

xi=d(A−Aset)dt��=�(�−�set)��

After you have set up your columns

for A−Aset�−����, d(A−Aset)/dt�(�−����)/��, xi��, and the cells for your
parameters like Kc��, τi�� and τd��, you will need to set up your PID column with
your PID equation in it. After entering your equation into the first cell of the PID column,
you may receive the Circular Reference error message when trying to drag the equation down
to the other cells in your column.

There are two things you can do:

1. It is likely that you need to start your PID equation in the second or third cell of your
PID column. Enter reasonable values into the first couple of cells before you start the
PID equation, and you will find that these values shouldn’t affect the end result of
your controller.
2. You can also try decreasing the step size (ΔtΔ�).

Summary Tables
A summary of the advantages and disadvantages of the three controls is shown below is
shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Advantages and disadvantages of controls

A guide for the typical uses of the various controllers is shown below in Table 2.

Table 2. Typical uses of P, I, D, PI, and PID controllers

A summary of definitions of the terms and symbols are shown below in Table 3.

Table 3. Definitions of terms and symbols.

Example 9.2.19.2.1

Hypothetical Industries has just put you in charge of one of their batch reactors. Your task is
to figure out a way to maintain a setpoint level inside of the reactor. Your boss wants to use
some type regulator controller, but he is not quite sure which to use. Help your boss find the
right type of controller. It is extremely important that the level inside the reactor is at the
setpoint. Large fluctuation and error cannot be tolerated.

Solution

You would want to use a PID controller. Because of the action of P control, the system will
respond to a change very quickly. Due to the action of I control, the system is able to be
returned to the setpoint value. Finally, because it is so critical for the system to remain at a
constant setpoint, D control will measure the change in the error, and help to adjust the
system accordingly.

Example 9.2.29.2.2

You go back to your high school and you notice an oven in your old chemistry class. The
oven is used to remove water from solutions. Using your knowledge from ChE 466, you
begin to wonder what type of controller the oven uses to maintain its set temperature. You
notice some high school students eager to learn, and you decide to share your knowledge with
them in hopes of inspiring them to become Chemical Engineers. Explain to them the type of
controller that is most likely located within the oven, and how that controller works.
Solution

Since the oven is only used to remove water from a solution, fluctuation, error, and lag
between the set point and the actual temperature are all acceptable. Therefore, the easiest and
simplest controller to use would be the On-Off controller. The On-Off controller turns on the
heating mechanism when the temperature in the oven is below the setpoint temperature. If the
temperature of the oven increases above the set temperature, the controller will turn the
heating mechanism off.

Example 9.2.39.2.3

Having taken your advice, your boss at Hypothetical Industries decides to install a PID
controller to control the level in the batch reactor. When you first start up the reactor, the
controller initially received a step input. As the reactor achieves steady state, the level in the
reactor tends to fluctuate, sending pulse inputs into the controller. For a pulse input, provide a
grahical representation of the PID controller output.

Figure 8. Pulse input.

Solution

The PID-controller output will be a combination of the P-only, I-only and D-only controller
outputs. Analogous to the P-controller output for the step input, the P-controller output for the
pulse input will exactly resemble the input.

Figure 9. P-controller output for pulse input.

The I-controller output represents the area under the input graph. Unlike the step input, the
area under the pulse input graph dropped back down to zero once the pulse has passed.
Therefore, rather than continually increase, the I-controller output graph will level off in the
end.
 Figure 10. I-controller output for pulse input.

The D-controller output represents the derivative of the input graph. The derivative at the first
discontinuity of the graph would be positive infinity. The derivative of the second downward
discontinuity is negative infinity.

Figure 11. D-controller output for pulse input.

Combining the qualitative characteristics of all three graphs we can determine the PID-
controller output for a pulse input.

Figure 12. PID-controller output for pulse input.

Example 9.2.39.2.3

Different kinds of disturbances are possible when determining the PID controller robustness.
These different disturbances are used to simulate changes that might occur within your
system. For a CSTR reactor, you decide to heat up your system to account for the cold
outside weather. The disturbance in the input temperature is a ramp disturbance, as shown in
figure #. If the controller responds to the input temperature, what will be the PID controller
output?
 Figure 13. Ramp input.

Solution

Using a controller with a p-only controller only, we will see a proportional change in the
controller output corresponding to the input variable change. See figure 14 below

Figure 14. P-controller output for ramp

input.

Using an I-only controller, we will see the controller corresponding to the area under the
graph, which in this case, seem to increase exponentially with the ramp geometry.

Figure 15. I-controller output for ramp

input.

Using a D-only controller, we will see a step response to the ramp disturbance. This is
because the D-component corresponds to the derivative, and a ramp input shows a constant
slope (positive in this case) which is different than the starting condition slope (zero usually).
See figure 16.
 Figure 16. D-controller output for ramp
input.

Using a PID controller, the three components all come to play in the controller output. As we
would expect, the result will be just a simple addition of the three separate component graphs.

Figure 17. D-controller output for ramp

input.
Example 9.2.69.2.6

Following is a P&ID of the process A+B-->C.

Figur
e 18. P&ID for a reaction process.

What is the PID controller expression on V3 controlling the volume in TK001 to a setpoint of
50 liters? Note: The PID controller uses LC1 to measure the volume.
Solution

The general equation for a PID controller is:

c(t)=Kc[e(t)+1Ti∫e(t)dt+Tddedt]+C�(�)=��[�(�)+1��∫�(�)��+������]
+�

where

 c(t)�(�) = controller output

 Kc�� = controller gain
 e(t)�(�) = error
 Ti�� = integral time
 Td�� = derivative time constant
 C� = initial value of controller

Therefore, for this example, the solution is:

Fout=offset+Kc[(V1−Vset)
+1Ti∫(V1−Vset)dt+Tdd(V1−Vvet)dt].�out=������+��[(�1−�set)
+1��∫(�1−�set)��+���(�1−�vet)��].
Example 9.2.69.2.6

In this problem, the differential equations describing a particular first-order system with a
PID controller will be determined. This is designed to show how well-defined systems can be
modeled or explained mathematically. As a supplement to this problem, visit Constructing
Block Diagrams. Note that this is an example of solution using integro-differential operators
rather than Laplace transforms. Here we have set Kp=1��=1.

Consider a general first-order process:

τpY′(t)+Y(t)=X(t)τ��′(�)+�(�)=�(�)

Where Y(t) is the output of the system and X(t) is the input. Add a PID controller to the
system and solve for a single, simple differential equation. The operator or equation for a PID
controller is below. Assume there is no dead time in the measurement.

G=Kc[1+1τI∫t0dτ+τDddt]�=��[1+1��∫0���+�����]

Solution: Use Constructing Block Diagrams as a reference when solving this problem.
Equations defining system,

 Process: τpY'(t) + Y(t) = X(t)

 Controller: X(t) = Gε(t)
 Comparator: ε(t) = R(t) − M(t)
 Measurement: M(t) = Y(t)
When these equations are combined into one equation, the following equation results. This is
achieved by adding the measurement to the comparator to the controller to the process
equation.

τpY′(t)+Y(t)=G(R(t)−Y(t))τ��′(�)+�(�)=�(�(�)−�(�))

Substituting the controller operator and then evaluating yields:

τpY′(t)+Y(t)=Kc[1+1τI∫t0dτ+τDddt(R(t)−Y(t))]���′(�)
+�(�)=��[1+1��∫0���+�����(�(�)−�(�))]

Because there is an integral in the differential equation, it is necessary to take the derivative
with respect to time.

To put this in standard notation for solving a second order differential equation,
the Y(t)�(�) need to be on one side, and the R(t)�(�) terms need to be on the opposite
side. Also, the coefficient of the Y(t)�(�) term needs to be one.

τI(τp−KcτD)KcY′′(t)+τI(1+Kc)KcY′(t)−Y(t)=τIτDR′′(t)+τIR′(t)
+R(t)��(��−����)���′′(�)+��(1+��)���′(�)−�(�)=�����′′
(�)+���′(�)+�(�)

The above equation can then be solved by hand or using a program such as Mathematica. If
using a computer program, different values for the control parameters Kc, τI, τD can be chosen,
and the response to a change in the system can be evaluated graphically.

Exercise 9.2.19.2.1

What type of controller is displayed by the equation below?

c(t)=Kc[e(t)+1Ti∫e(t)dt]�(�)=��[�(�)+1��∫�(�)��]
a. Feedforward
b. PID
c. Derivative
d. Proportional Integral
Answer
Exercise 9.2.29.2.2
Which type of controller increases the stability of the system by keeping it at a consistent
setting?

a. Derivative
b. Proportional
c. On-Off
d. Integral
Answer
Exercise 9.2.39.2.3

Which type of controller increases the speed of response to reach the desired set point the
fastest while eliminating offset?

a. On-Off
b. Proportional
c. Integral
d. Proportional-Integral
Answer

A microbiology laboratory discovered a deadly new strain of bacteria, named P. Woolfi, in

the city's water supply. In order to sterilize the water, the bacteria has to be heat killed at a
temperature of 105 degrees Celsius. However, this is above the boiling point of water at 1
atm and the bacteria is only susceptible to heat when in liquid due to spore formation when in
gas or vapor. To accomplish this sterilization it was suggested that an auto-clave be used to
keep the water in the liquid state by keeping it at a pressure of 5 atm while heated for 30
seconds. The auto-clave can only handle up to 7 atm of pressure before exploding, so to
ensure that the process is running at the desired specifications, a PID Controller Model must
be created in Excel. See figure 18 for a visual of the system.
 Figure
18.Auto-clave with PID Controls for Temperature and Pressure

Click on this link for the worked out Excel Solution

Explanation:

To simulate the real situation of pressure varying in the system, column B calls an equation to
generate a random fluctuation in pressure. Pset is simply the desired specification. Error is the
difference between the set pressure and measured signal. du/dt is the sum of the P, I, and D
terms. The equations used to calculate each of these can be found in the article, these take
into account the error associated with each time-step. dU/dt is the parameter that is varied in
order to correct for the difference between the measured pressure and desired pressure.

References
  Astrom, Karl J., Hagglund, Tore., "Advanced PID Control", The Instrumentation,
Systems and Automation Society.
 Cooper, Douglas J. "Practical Process Control E-Textbook
" http://www.controlguru.com
 Scrcek, William Y., Mahoney, Donald P., Young, Brent R. "A Real Time Approach
to Process Control", 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This page titled 9.2: P, I, D, PI, PD, and PID control is shared under a CC BY 3.0 license and
was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Ardemis Boghossian, James Brown, Sara Zak, &
Sara Zak via source content that was edited to the style and standards of the LibreTexts
platform; a detailed edit history is available upon request.

1. Back to top

 Was this article helpful?

 Yes

 No

The LibreTexts libraries are Powered by NICE CXone Expert and are supported by the
Department of Education Open Textbook Pilot Project, the UC Davis Office of the Provost,
the UC Davis Library, the California State University Affordable Learning Solutions
Program, and Merlot. We also acknowledge previous National Science Foundation support
under grant numbers 1246120, 1525057, and 1413739. Legal. Accessibility Statement For
more information contact us at [email protected].