BUSINESS AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

Corporate Social Responsibility or CSR is a concept, whereby the organizations integrate

social and environmental concerns in their business operations and their interaction with the
stakeholders on a voluntary basis. Every large corporation should be thought of as a social
enterprise that is an entity, whose existence and decisions can be justified as long as they
serve public and social purposes (Crowther, & Aras, 2008).
The view of three main principles of CSR are to be taken into consideration to comprise all of
the CSR activity (Crowther, & Aras, 2008):
Sustainability: Sustainability is concerned with the effect in terms of which action is taken
into consideration in the present, which has an impact upon the options that are available in
the future.
Accountability: Accountability is concerned with an organization recognising that its actions
affect the external environment and therefore assuming responsibility for the effects of its
actions.
Transparency: Transparency, as a principle, means that the external impact of the actions of
the organization can be ascertained from that organization’s reporting and pertinent facts are
not disguised within this reporting.

Diagram 1: Components of CSR

WHAT EFFECT DOES CSR HAVE ON SUSTAINABILITY?

A study conducted by Lijuan Wu and Shanyue Jin (2022) on Corporate Social Responsibility
and Sustainability: From a Corporate Governance Perspective, the following results were
obtained:
o CSR has a positive impact on enterprise sustainability. The fulfilment of CSR is
conducive to enhancing corporate sustainable development ability.
o Internal control and management capabilities positively moderate the process of social
responsibility, influencing the corporate sustainable development ability. The better
the internal control and management capability, the greater the promotion effect of
CSR on the corporate sustainable development ability.
o The quality of accounting information plays a moderating role in enterprises fulfilling
their social responsibilities, and affects their sustainable development abilities. The
poorer the quality of accounting information, the more significant the role of CSR in
promoting the sustainable development of enterprises).
Other examples; a meta-analysis by Margolis and Walsh (2003) found a positive correlation
between CSR and financial performance in 80% of the studies reviewed. Similarly, research
by Eccles et al. (2011) suggests that companies with strong sustainability practices tend to
outperform their peers in terms of financial performance, risk management, and stakeholder
relations.

CSR AND SUSTAINABILITY INITIATIVES

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sustainability initiatives have become increasingly
prominent in the corporate world as businesses recognize the importance of addressing social
and environmental concerns alongside their economic objectives. These initiatives encompass
a wide range of practices aimed at minimizing negative impacts on society and the
environment while maximizing positive contributions.
CSR involves businesses operating in a manner that meets or exceeds ethical, legal, and
societal expectations, while sustainability refers to meeting the needs of the present without
compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Both concepts
emphasize the integration of economic, social, and environmental considerations into
business operations.
CSR and sustainability initiatives can take various forms, including philanthropy,
environmental stewardship, ethical labour practices, community engagement, and supply
chain sustainability. For instance, companies may implement recycling programs, reduce
carbon emissions, promote diversity and inclusion in the workplace, support local
communities through volunteering or donations, and ensure ethical sourcing of materials.
Leading companies integrate CSR and sustainability into their overall business strategies
rather than treating them as separate initiatives. This strategic approach helps drive
innovation, enhance brand reputation, attract and retain talent, mitigate risks, and create long-
term value for stakeholders. For example, Unilever's Sustainable Living Plan outlines
ambitious targets to improve health and well-being, reduce environmental impact, and
enhance livelihoods, while also driving business growth.
Transparent reporting on CSR and sustainability performance is essential for accountability
and building trust with stakeholders. Many companies publish annual sustainability reports
following recognized frameworks such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) or the
Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) standards. These reports provide detailed
information on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics, goals, progress, and
challenges.
Increasingly, regulatory requirements and investor expectations are driving companies to
prioritize CSR and sustainability. For instance, the European Union's Non-Financial
Reporting Directive mandates large companies to disclose non-financial information,
including environmental and social impacts. Moreover, investors are incorporating ESG
factors into their investment decisions to assess long-term risks and opportunities.
Despite the benefits, implementing CSR and sustainability initiatives can present challenges
such as resource constraints, conflicting stakeholder interests, greenwashing accusations, and
the complexity of measuring impacts. Companies must navigate these challenges effectively
through robust governance structures, stakeholder engagement, and continuous improvement.
In conclusion, CSR and sustainability initiatives are integral to modern business practices,
offering benefits for companies, society, and the environment. By aligning economic interests
with social and environmental responsibilities, businesses can contribute to a more
sustainable and equitable future.

BUSINESS STRATEGIES FOR INTEGRATING SUSTAINABILITY

INTO OPERATIONS

The creation of a sustainable, just and equitable economy will require fundamental shifts in
the way businesses operate. Businesses, in particular, bear some responsibility for many of
the social and environmental problems currently afflicting society, such as exploitative
working conditions, or the destruction of habitats.
In the article “Integrating Sustainability Into Business Practices Introduction”, Pandey talks
about 4 steps to integrate sustainability into business practices:
I. Integrating Sustainability in Business
Becoming a sustainable company involves a conscious and continuing effort to build long-
term value for shareholders by contributing to a sustainable society. This can be dealt with in
two stages stage:
 ▪ Reframing the company's identity through leadership commitment and involving
external stakeholders and agencies to develop and maintain sustainability as core
ethics of the company.
▪ Defining the new identity through employee engagement and mechanisms of
execution.
These are ongoing and continuous processes. Leadership commitment towards sustainability
provides a strong motivation for employee engagement because employees know that their
leaders care about what they are doing.
II. Commitment From Different Stages
When leadership commitment drives the process, it usually comes from the personal
resolution of a CEO to create a more sustainable company. In general, top-level executives
can create an enterprise-wide vision and the clout to see that it is materialised. Commitment
and external engagement for sustainable enterprise are necessary for transformational change.
Employee engagement fosters trust and innovation and ensures that change happens as
innovations diffused throughout the organisation.
III. Innovation
For sustainable companies, innovation is a core area of social engagement. To improve
financial performance along with relevant environmental issues, social and governance
dimensions, sustainable companies tend to focus on innovations in development processes,
products and business models. A promise to sustainability becomes a "forcing function" for
innovation.
IV. Sustainable Business Model
A business model helps to understand how a company does business, how it creates values
and formulates the business logic. Apart from this, the other essential factors are the support
of a value proposition for the customer and a viable structure of revenues and costs for the
company delivering that value.
Many researchers advocate that sustainable business models should integrate social,economic
and ecological aspect with the sophisticated approach to cope with the challenges of a
sustainable future.
A business model for sustainability helps in describing, analysing, managing and
communicating-
• A company’s sustainable value proposition to all stakeholders,
• Creation and delivering this value,
• Capturing economic value.

The model presented by Dyllick and Hockerts(2002) based on the concept of corporate
sustainability presented in the form of a triangle of three elements: business case, original
case and societal case. In this model with the environmental effects of the company's
operations, social and economic efficiency was taken.
 Diagram 2: Depiction of Model by Dyllick and Hockerts (2002)

McDonough and Braungart introduced a model ‘Triple Top Line (2002)’ of corporate
sustainability in the form of a fractal triangle of ecology, equity and economy. Between the
corners of the triangle are intermediate states, taking into account the marginal conditions
described in the corners. The model powerfully highlights the importance of the economic
factor (profits), widely recognises the environmental aspect and in maintaining the balance in
the human being's ecosystem. The environmental efficiency factor is also one of the factors
taken in the various models.

Diagram 3: Triple Top Line Growth by McDonough and Braungart (2002)

SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS STRATEGY

Sustainability strategy has three core dimensions (Baumgartner and Ebner 2010). These
include an economic dimension, containing those activities which are required for a business
to remain functioning in the market. Factors such as innovation, collaboration or knowledge
management are critical business functions in terms of developing economically valuable
products or services. Without this element, businesses will be unable to finance themselves,
and will ultimately become bankrupt.
Ecological dimensions of sustainable strategy concern environmental activities that cause or
prevent environmental impacts. These include, for instance, recycling, biodiversity, or waste
management. These processes help mediate the relationship between the business and the
physical or natural environment. It is these aspects that can help sustainable strategies to
contribute towards sustainable economic growth in terms of environmental dimensions.
Current growth is associated with unsustainable production and consumption, but integration
of sustainable strategies can help to ensure that growth decoupled from material consumption
and exploitation.
The social dimension of a sustainable strategy has internal and external dimensions.
Internally, aspects such corporate governance and employee health and safety are important –
they can improve productivity, enhance the attractiveness of a business as an employer and
ensure that internal policies are ethical. It is these aspects that are critical for targets
concerned with good, safe, just and fairly paid livelihoods. Externally, social dimensions
focus on how the business relates to external stakeholders, and its wider ethical behaviour in
the community.

BUSINESS MODELS AND SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES

The business model helps to define the competitive strategy, impacts the design of products
(and so also environmental and social impacts in the value chain), the value the product
delivers (including environmental or social value), and how the firm captures some of this
value (Rasmussen 2007). Sustainable strategies create sustainable business models.
Bocken et al. (2014), in their research on sustainable business model archetypes, identify
technological, social and organizational types, each able to support different sustainable
strategy. Technological archetypes include:
1) the maximization of material and energy efficiency. This business model type seeks to do
more with fewer resources, generating less waste, emissions and pollution. In this way, it has
links with eco-efficiency initiatives.
2) Business models that create value from waste can reduce pollution and reduce costs in the
production process; wastes are often seen as undesirable, and so if a business model and
accompanying strategy are able to use these inputs, they are often at lower cost and help
reduce wastes that need processing or dumping into the environment.
3) Substitute with renewables and natural processes – these business models reduce
environmental impacts and increase organizational resilience by reducing reliance on finite or
hard to get inputs.
Socially orientated sustainable business models cover the next three types. These include
4) functionality rather than ownership. These business models satisfy users’ needs without the
users having to own the physical products. This enables organizations to ensure that
machinery and capital is used in an optimal way, while they are also better able to manage
material flows – helping to decuple growth from material use, in turn helping to facilitate
sustainable growth.
5) Adopt a stewardship role business models involve proactively engaging with stakeholders
to ensure their long-term health and well-being; stewardship and certification schemes are
good examples of this type of approach, where organizations are accredited as to their efforts
at long-term care of a resource or community.
6) Encouraging sufficiency: These business models actively seek to reduce consumption and
production, often through demand and supply side effects. For instance, energy service
companies encourage consumers to reduce energy use. This would usually reduce revenue for
the energy provider. However, with innovative contracts or government support, these
organizations are able to benefit by reducing overall energy consumption.
The final two types of sustainable business model relate to organizational elements. These
include:
7) repurposing for society or the environment, such as prioritizing social or environmental
value creation, over economic profit. This is often achieved by aligning with and integrating
local communities and stakeholders into the organization.
8) The development of scale up solutions, which involves ensuring that effective local
solutions can be scaled to enhance impact.

It should be highlighted that business models are simplifications to aid in design and
assessment. In this way, the development of a full strategy involves placing the business
models within specific contexts, considering local conditions, competitors, regulations etc.
These business model types can also be used together.

CIRCULAR ECONOMY

Diagram 4: The Circular Economy Model

Circular economic is a new approach to sustainability. Its potential is in part due to its
applicability to a wide range of organizations. Circular economy is the opposite of a linear
economy, which is characteristic of most contemporary production processes, where natural
resources are converted into products, via production, which then turn to wastes. This means
natural capital is used, and never restored.
Circular economy strategies aim to have no net effect on the environment, restoring
damaging resource acquisition, while reducing the waste generated in production (Gast,
Gundolf, and Cesinger 2017; Murray, Skene, and Haynes 2017; Geissdoerfer et al. 2017). A
key premise of this approach is that overall systems (and strategies) are optimized, rather than
individual components. This is achieved via design to re-design thinking, and other novel
innovation techniques.
Circular economy strategies have grown from work by industrial ecologists in the 1990s. The
aim was to create a system with (near) complete internal cycling of materials (MacArthur
2013). The 4R framework of reduce, reuse, remanufacture and recycle is often used as a
hierarchy of preferred options for managing materials. Reduce involves increasing efficiency
by consuming fewer natural resources and materials during both the production and use
phases. Reuse involves ensuring that old products that are still able to function are still used.
While remanufacture takes old and often worn-out products and through processing, and
ensures that they retain their original function. Lastly, recycling involves further processing
of materials to obtain the same or lower quality (Kirchherr et al. 2017). How circular
economic interacts with social aspects, such as working conditions or wider social issues is
not so clear. However, these types of strategies can help to create new industries, new jobs as
well as the creation of more sustainable economies.

ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS PRACTICES

Diagram 5: Benefits of Sustainable Business Practices

Implementing sustainable business practices can yield various economic benefits for
organizations. Below are some of the key economic advantages associated with sustainability,
supported by relevant literature:
Cost Savings and Efficiency:
✓ Sustainable practices often lead to cost savings through improved resource efficiency,
reduced waste generation, and optimized operational processes (Porter & van der
Linde, 1995).
✓ Studies have found that investments in energy efficiency, waste reduction, and
sustainable supply chain management can result in significant financial returns over
time (Delmas & Pekovic, 2018).
✓ By adopting renewable energy sources and implementing energy-saving technologies,
companies can reduce their reliance on fossil fuels and lower energy costs (He et al.,
2021).
Enhanced Productivity and Innovation:
✓ Sustainability can drive innovation by encouraging companies to develop new
products, services, and business models that meet environmental and social needs
(Hart, 1995).
✓ Research suggests that firms with a strong commitment to sustainability are more
likely to invest in research and development (R&D) and introduce innovative
solutions to sustainability challenges (Orsato & Wells, 2007).
✓ Employee engagement in sustainability initiatives can also stimulate creativity,
problem-solving, and continuous improvement, leading to enhanced productivity and
competitiveness (Delmas & Toffel, 2008).
Improved Market Access and Reputation:
✓ Sustainable businesses often enjoy preferential treatment from customers, investors,
and regulators, leading to increased market access and competitive advantage (Sen &
Bhattacharya, 2001).
✓ Companies that demonstrate environmental stewardship, ethical labor practices, and
social responsibility are more likely to attract socially conscious consumers and
investors, thereby expanding their customer base and investor pool (Eccles et al.,
2011).
✓ Positive corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sustainability performance can
enhance brand reputation, trust, and loyalty, ultimately driving sales and market share
growth (Margolis & Walsh, 2003).
Risk Mitigation and Resilience:
✓ Sustainability initiatives help organizations mitigate various risks, including
regulatory compliance, supply chain disruptions, reputational damage, and climate
change impacts (Elkington, 1997).
✓ By diversifying supply chains, investing in resilience measures, and anticipating
emerging risks, companies can enhance their ability to adapt to changing market
conditions and external shocks (Cohen & Wieland, 2013).
 ✓ Sustainability reporting and transparency can also improve stakeholder trust and
confidence, reducing the likelihood of costly lawsuits, boycotts, and other adverse
consequences (Hillenbrand & Money, 2007).
In conclusion, sustainable business practices offer numerous economic benefits, including
cost savings, productivity gains, market opportunities, and risk reduction. By integrating
sustainability into their operations, organizations can create long-term value for shareholders,
employees, customers, and society as a whole.
References:
• Baumgartner, Rupert J., and Daniela Ebner. 2010. “Corporate Sustainability
Strategies: Sustainability Profiles and Maturity Levels.” Sustainable Development 18
(2): 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.447.
• Cohen, M. A., & Wieland, A. (2013). The role of supply chain transparency in the
transformation of risk propagation. Journal of Operations Management, 31(7-8), 623-
635.
• Bocken, N.M.P., S.W. Short, P. Rana, and S. Evans. 2014. “A Literature and Practice
Review to Develop Sustainable Business Model Archetypes.” Journal of Cleaner
Production 65 (February): 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039.
• Crowther, D., & Aras, G. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility. Retrieved January
12, 2020 from mdos.si
• Delmas, M. A., & Pekovic, S. (2018). Environmental standards and labor
productivity: Understanding the mechanisms that sustain sustainability. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 39(2), 187-204.
• Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2008). Organizational responses to environmental
demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal, 29(10), 1027-1055.
• Dyllick, Thomas & Hockerts, Kai. (2002). Beyond the Business Case for Corporate
Sustainability. University of St.Gallen. 11. 10.1002/bse.323.
• Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2011). The impact of corporate
sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science,
60(11), 2835-2857.
• Gast, Johanna, Katherine Gundolf, and Beate Cesinger. 2017. “Doing Business in a
Green Way: A Systematic Review of the Ecological Sustainability Entrepreneurship
Literature and Future Research Directions.” Journal of Cleaner Production 147
(March): 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.065.
• Geissdoerfer, Martin, Paulo Savaget, Nancy MP Bocken, and Erik Jan Hultink. 2017.
“The Circular Economy–A New Sustainability Paradigm?” Journal of Cleaner
Production 143: 757–68.
• Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of
Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014.
• He, X., Tang, S., & Wang, W. (2021). Does corporate environmental responsibility
lead to economic performance? Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production,
279, 123724.
• Kapur, Radhika. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility.
• MacArthur, Ellen. 2013. “Towards a Circular Economy—Economic and Business
Rationale for an Accelerated Transition.” Ellen MacArthur Foundation: Cowes, UK.
• Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social
initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268-305.
• Murray, Alan, Keith Skene, and Kathryn Haynes. 2017. “The Circular Economy: An
Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context.”
Journal of Business Ethics 140 (3): 369–80.
• Orsato, R. J., & Wells, P. (2007). The diffusion of cleaner vehicles in the UK: A
sociotechnical analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16(4), 282-296.
• Pandey, Nisha. (2020). Integrating Sustainability Into Business Practices Introduction.
• Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the
environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4),
97-118.
• Rasmussen, Bruce. 2007. “Business Models and the Theory of the Firm.”
• Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better?
Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research,
38(2), 225-243.
• Thomas B. Long, (2019) Sustainable Business Strategy. In Leal Filho, W., Azul, A.M.,
Brandli, L., Özuyar, P.G., Wall, T. (Eds.) Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable
Development Goals: Decent Work and Economic Growth. Springer, UK
• Wu, L.; Jin, S. Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability: From a Corporate
Governance Perspective. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15457.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215457