Are you struggling with writing a literature review?

Many students find this task daunting and time-

One common challenge students face is distinguishing between a literature review and references.
While references list the sources cited within a paper, a literature review goes beyond this by
providing a comprehensive overview and analysis of the existing literature on a topic.

Writing a literature review involves:

1. Identifying Relevant Sources: This includes academic journals, books, articles, and other
scholarly sources that are relevant to your topic.
2. Analyzing and Synthesizing Information: You need to critically evaluate each source,
identify key themes, arguments, and findings, and synthesize them to provide a coherent
overview of the topic.
3. Organizing the Review: A literature review should have a clear structure, typically organized
thematically or chronologically, to present the information logically.
4. Writing Clearly and Concisely: Writing a literature review requires clarity and precision in
conveying your analysis and insights to the reader.

Given the complexities involved, many students seek assistance with their literature reviews. ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers professional writing services to help you tackle this challenging task. Our
experienced writers can conduct thorough research, analyze the literature, and craft a well-written
literature review tailored to your requirements.

Ordering from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ ensures that you receive a high-quality literature review that
meets academic standards and saves you time and effort. Don't let the difficulty of writing a
literature review hold you back. Place your order with ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ today and get the expert
assistance you need.
Hart, Chris. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. Cohort
vs Case Studies Case-control studies are retrospective in nature. A systematic review is a research
study of research studies. Single pages take p., e.g., p. B2; multiple pages take pp. A literature
review gives a summary of the key points of the available literature on the given topic. References
Style 1. Book:Author Name(s), Author Sir Name(s), (Year). This way the case study is not just an
isolated description, but is integrated into existing knowledge about the topic. Note: You must create
a free account to search EvidenceAlerts. To find reviews on your topic, use the search box in the
upper-right corner. Identify conflicts in previous studies, open questions, or gaps that may exist. Two
or More Works by the Same Author in the Same Year. The three-step process. STEP 1. Analyse the
topic. Read the question carefully at least three times. First International Conference on Computer
Support for Collaborative. Peer Review reports Introduction JGCT is a rare and benign renal tumor
that originate from the juxtaglomerular cells of the capillary adventitia in the juxtaglomerular
complex. Cover the entire scope of the movie (except the end) Write about 5 events. Qualitative
versus quantitative research Empirical versus theoretical scholarship Divide the research by
sociological, historical, or cultural sources Theoretical: In many humanities articles, the literature
review is the foundation for the theoretical framework. It allows you to explore the key
characteristics, meanings, and implications of the case. Sessions can be in the library, classroom or
virtual. All 15 JGCTs were solitary tumors, including seven in the right kidney and eight in the left
kidney. Three types of homogeneity tests can be used: 1) forest plot, 2) Cochrane’s Q test (chi-
squared), and 3) Higgins I 2 statistics. Severity of Disease and risk of malignant change in hereditary
multiple exostoses. Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques. The
individual plots are broader at the bottom and narrower at the top. (B) Funnel plot with publication
bias. The writer will evaluate whether the information from that particular source is relevant to the
particular topic and examine the quality of the work. You will likely find that there are LOTS of
popular sources in with the academic ones, even within our databases. Systematic Review This form
consists of an overview of existing evidence pertinent to a clearly formulated research question,
which uses pre-specified and standardized methods to identify and critically appraise relevant
research, and to collect, report, and analyze data from the studies that are included in the review.
Literature search and study selection In order to secure proper basis for evidence-based research, it is
essential to perform a broad search that includes as many studies as possible that meet the inclusion
and exclusion criteria. Neha Deo Citation and references Citation and references Md. During the
systematic review process, the quality of studies is evaluated, and a statistical meta-analysis of the
study results is conducted on the basis of their quality. From January 2005 to July 2020, fifteen
patients diagnosed as JGCT by surgical pathology in Peking Union Medical College Hospital were
collected.
Read them to get a sense of the types of themes you might want to look for in your own research or
to identify ways to organize your final review. REQUEST A FREE TRIAL Thought for Food Blog
What is the difference between a systematic review and a systematic literature review. In most of
analyzed cases (94%) a pathogenic variant was identified. Henry, W. A., III. (1990, April 9). Making
the grade in today's schools. Time. In 69 cases out of 103, the cartilaginous cap thickness was
captured, with a median width of 3 cm, ranging from 2.2 to 5.5 cm. Diameter of the SPC lesion
ranges from 8.5 to 14.6 cm (median 11 cm) for the 78 cases where this information was available.
Statistical analysis SPSS 20.0 software was used for statistical analysis. During the systematic
review process, the quality of studies is evaluated, and a statistical meta-analysis of the study results
is conducted on the basis of their quality. They include point-of-care resources, textbooks,
conference proceedings, etc. Writing a literature review is fairly complex than writing an essay. This
is particularly true in disciplines in medicine and the sciences where research conducted becomes
obsolete very quickly as new discoveries are made. It does not necessarily filter to include
publications that go through a strict peer-review process. The difference between annotated
bibliography and literature review lies in the way they present information. References Style 1.
Book:Author Name(s), Author Sir Name(s), (Year). Many student writers struggle to synthesize
because they feel they don’t have anything to add to the scholars they are citing; here are some
strategies to help you: It often helps to remember that the point of these kinds of syntheses is to
show your readers how you understand your research, to help them read the rest of your paper. One
tumor located in the cortex and medulla, with the size of 1.5 cm, showed slightly high density on
non-contrast enhanced CT and moderate enhancement during parenchymal phase on contrast
enhanced CT. Contact Us Online Library Support Faculty Library Instruction Request Faculty can
request library instruction for themselves or their class. Three common methods are used for
weighted estimation in a fixed-effect model: 1) inverse variance-weighted estimation 3), 2) Mantel-
Haenszel estimation 4), and 3) Peto estimation 5). Thus, this will require a collection of published (in
print or online) work concerning the selected research area. In simple terms, a literature is a review of
the literature in the related subject area. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review.
Unlike a fixed-effect model, a random-effect model assumes that the size of the effect of treatment
differs among studies. Journals paginated by issue begin with page one every issue; therefore, the
issue. However, particularly in the social sciences, thinking about research problems from multiple
vectors is a key strategy for finding new solutions to a problem or gaining a new perspective.
Selection Methods: Criteria you used to select (and perhaps exclude) sources in your literature
review. You begin to backtrack to try to find the source or common element of the infection. Second,
a table is shown with the characteristics of the included studies. In this paper we describe clinical
and histological findings and genetic background of a large series of SPC in MO patients. Does the
work ultimately contribute in any significant way to an understanding of the subject? II. Systematic
Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Regardless of this commonality, both types of
review vary significantly.
Genotype-phenotype correlation study in 529 patients with multiple hereditary exostoses:
identification of protective and risk factors. When performing a systematic literature review or meta-
analysis, if the quality of studies is not properly evaluated or if proper methodology is not strictly
applied, the results can be biased and the outcomes can be incorrect. JBI EBP Database (formerly
Joanna Briggs Institute EBP Database) This database includes systematic reviews, evidence
summaries, and best practice information sheets. What is the difference between literature and
review study? 1 Answer. Write the case description, the context and the process involved. East-West
Environmental Linkages Network Workshop 3. J Med Genet. 1983.. Pritchard DJ, Lunke RJ, Taylor
WF, Dahlin DC, Medley BE. National programme for prevention and control of cancer, diabetes,
CVDs and s. What types of sources should I review (books, journal articles, websites; scholarly
versus popular sources)? 3. This approach helps highlight ethical issues which you should be aware
of and consider as you go through your own study. Should I evaluate the sources in any way beyond
evaluating how they relate to understanding the research problem? 5. Include techniques and any
equipment you used If there were participants in your research, who were they. Maximum linear
dimension and cartilaginous caps of tumors were measured either radiologically or by gross
examination, when possible. Ethics declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate.
Heterogeneity Homogeneity test is a method whether the degree of heterogeneity is greater than
would be expected to occur naturally when the effect size calculated from several studies is higher
than the sampling error. A literature review is a document or section of a document that collects key
sources on a topic and discusses those sources in conversation with each other (also called synthesis
). You can find critically-appraised individual articles in these resources: EvidenceAlerts Quality
articles from over 120 clinical journals are selected by research staff and then rated for clinical
relevance and interest by an international group of physicians. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications, 1998; Jesson, Jill. The introduction lays the foundation for understanding the research
problem and should be written in a way that leads the reader from the general subject area of the
topic to the particular topic of research. Location: Label. (Recording date if different from copyright
date). Two of them underwent intraoperative ultrasound localization, which successfully guided the
laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. These research methods are powerful tools that can overcome the
difficulties in performing large-scale randomized controlled trials. The images or other third party
material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated
otherwise in a credit line to the material. Review, extract the relevant information for eg how the
study was conducted and the findings. Berndt, T. J. (1981b). Effects of friendship on prosocial
intentions and. Regardless of this commonality, both types of review vary significantly. Yoshida, Y.
(2001). Essays in urban transportation (Doctoral dissertation. A literature review is an account of
what has been published on a topic by accredited scholars and researchers. Corresponding authors
Correspondence to He Liu or Qingli Zhu. The investigators resolve differences of opinion by debate,
and if they fail to reach a consensus, a third-reviewer is consulted.
Moreover, if the confidence interval includes 1, then the result shows no evidence of difference
between the treatment and control groups. As you go down the pyramid, the amount of evidence
will increase as the quality of the evidence decreases. Therefore, to make the literature look
appealing, they need to know some of the methods that can help them improve their review. CT
manifestations Of the 11 tumors detected by ultrasound, non-contrast enhanced CT showed five low
density, three isodensity, one slightly high density and two mixed density. NOTE: Most often the
literature review will incorporate some combination of types. Ultrasound, combined with clinical
manifestations, was helpful for the diagnosis. Rights and permissions Open Access This article is
licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use,
sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give
appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons
licence, and indicate if changes were made. Colorado State University; Mills, Albert J., Gabrielle
Durepos, and Eiden Wiebe, editors. You have patients that are sick with a new disease. A literature
review is an account of what has been published on a topic by accredited scholars and researchers.
An essay is usually a brief piece of writing on a particular topic. Through a literature review, it is easy
to understand the research problem of the current study. Guideline Central This free database offers
quick-reference guideline summaries organized by a new non-profit initiative which will aim to fill
the gap left by the sudden closure of AHRQ’s National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC). This
option is normally located in the left column; you can see screenshots of this option from WorldCat
Discovery (left) and our EBSCO databases (right). Since the thesaurus is designed for the sciences of
food and health, it is the most comprehensive for the field. You can find critically-appraised topics in
these resources: Annual Reviews This collection offers comprehensive, timely collections of critical
reviews written by leading scientists. Given this, the purpose of a literature review is to: Place each
work in the context of its contribution to understanding the research problem being studied. Note:
This resource contains both expert opinion and evidence-based practice articles. However, when
writing a review in the social sciences, a survey of the history of the literature may be required. This
finding highlights the need of a personalization of follow-up management for young borderline
cases. You can also find systematic reviews in this unfiltered database: To learn more about finding
systematic reviews, please see our guide: Filtered Resources: Systematic Reviews Critically-
appraised topics Authors of critically-appraised topics evaluate and synthesize multiple research
studies. Work-role of Radiation Therapists in the Consequences of Adaptive Radiotherap. For
instance, for a systematic review, reviewers would strive to locate relevant unpublished studies in
grey literature and possibly by contacting researchers directly. Have a language expert improve your
writing Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free. To qualify as
a systematic review, a review needs to adhere to standards of transparency and reproducibility. When
results are presented in the same units, the MD can be used, but when results are presented in
different units, the SMD should be used. If you have a more in-depth research need, please complete
the consultation request form linked below. Case studies tend to focus on qualitative data using
methods such as interviews, observations, and analysis of primary and secondary sources (e.g.,
newspaper articles, photographs, official records). A good case study should have the potential to:
Provide new or unexpected insights into the subject Challenge or complicate existing assumptions
and theories Propose practical courses of action to resolve a problem Open up new directions for
future research TipIf your research is more practical in nature and aims to simultaneously investigate
an issue as you solve it, consider conducting action research instead. Given below are the main
stages of a systematic review.
Their need stems from the ever-increasing output of scientific publications.For example, compared to
1991, in 2008 three, eight, and forty times more papers were indexed in Web of Science on malaria,
obesity, and biodiversity, respectively.Given such mountains of papers, scientists cannot be expected
to examine in detail every. Peer Review reports Introduction JGCT is a rare and benign renal tumor
that originate from the juxtaglomerular cells of the capillary adventitia in the juxtaglomerular
complex. Expert Journals is a publishing division of Sprint Investify. This can negatively impact on
number of milder cases (characterized by less health complaint and no need of surgical intervention),
leading to a series not completely representative of whole MO population. In 69 cases out of 103,
the cartilaginous cap thickness was captured, with a median width of 3 cm, ranging from 2.2 to 5.5
cm. Diameter of the SPC lesion ranges from 8.5 to 14.6 cm (median 11 cm) for the 78 cases where
this information was available. An increase in size of a lesion after puberty and the presence of pain
in adults are signs that raise suspicion of a Secondary Peripheral Chondrosarcoma (SPC). The role of
Real-Time contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Guiding Radiofrequency ablation of Reninoma: Case
Report and Literature Review. In meta-analyses of large-scale studies, the P value is more greatly
affected by the number of studies and patients included, rather than by the significance of the
results; therefore, care should be taken when interpreting the results of a meta-analysis. For example,
if you are writing a persuasive essay, your aim is to persuade your readers to agree with you and
understand your point; the content of the essay will contain strong arguments and facts. Clinical
Inquiries deliver best evidence for point-of-care use. However, the application of enhanced
ultrasound needs to be based on the two-dimensional ultrasound localization of the lesion. Use
Caution When Paraphrasing When paraphrasing a source that is not your own, be sure to represent
the author's information or opinions accurately and in your own words. A system for the surgical
staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. The critical evaluation of each work should consider:
Provenance -- what are the author's credentials. A p-value? This study includes 105 MO - for the
large majority Caucasian Italian - patients ??74 male and 31 female - affected by SPC - that were
evaluated at the IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli. Unlike a fixed-effect model, a random-effect
model assumes that the size of the effect of treatment differs among studies. Thematic: If you have
found some recurring central themes that you will continue working with throughout your piece, you
can organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic. In this
paper we describe clinical and histological findings and genetic background of a large series of SPC
in MO patients. Two of them underwent intraoperative ultrasound localization, which successfully
guided the laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Author information Li Wang and Meiying Li
contributed equally to this work. Often, the literature review is where you can establish your
research as filling a particular gap or as relevant in a particular way. The first is the P value from the
z-test, which tests the null hypothesis that the intervention has no effect. A literature review is a
document or section of a document that collects key sources on a topic and discusses those sources
in conversation with each other (also called synthesis ). Article title, Name of conference, Location of
conference, Pages. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( ) applies to the data
made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. Writing Your
Literature Review Once you've settled on how to organize your literature review, you're ready to
write each section. When there is a inconsistency in opinions, intervention is required via debate or
by a third reviewer. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:966081.. Published 2022 Sep 23. ES contributed to
clinical diagnosis and was involved in patients’ recruitment, data revision and in paper drafting.
Second are the reviews of those studies that summarize and offer new interpretations built from and
often extending beyond the primary studies.