PROCESS SAFETY CONTRACT NO.

DOCUMENT NO. SP3MK-

ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP-22- 005/PG3400/2022-S7
001

DOCUMENT NO.
41 PAGES
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN DAN KONSTRUKSI (EPC)

PEMBANGUNAN PIPA GAS SENIPAH-BALIKPAPAN

FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT

0.1 19/12/2022 Issued for Comment DW ASW EFC AK DA

PREP’D CHK’D APV’D CHK’D APV’D APV’D

REV DATE DESCRIPTION
PT PERTAMINA PT PERTAMINA
PT PGAS SOLUTION
GAS HULU MAHAKAM
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 1 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

TABULATION OF REVISION SHEET

REVISION REVISION
PAGE 0.1 0.2 0.3 REMARKS PAGE 0.1 0.2 0.3 REMARKS

1 X 31 X
2 X 32 X
3 X 33 X
4 X 34 X
5 X 35 X
6 X 36 X
7 X 37 X
8 X 38 X
9 X 39 X
10 X 40 X
11 X 41 X
12 X
13 X
14 X
15 X
16 X
17 X
18 X
19 X
20 X
21 X
22 X
23 X
24 X
25 X
26 X
27 X
28 X
29 X
30 X
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 2 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

REVISION NOTES

Implementasion
Rev Section Page Comment Remarks
(Y/N)
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 3 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

TABLE OF CONTENT

TABULATION OF REVISION SHEET ......................................................................................................................... 1

TABLE OF CONTENT ................................................................................................................................................. 3
LIST OF TABLE ........................................................................................................................................................... 4
LIST OF FIGURE ........................................................................................................................................................ 5
1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 6
1.1 Project Overview ............................................................................................................................................... 6
1.2 Objective ........................................................................................................................................................... 6
1.3 Scope ................................................................................................................................................................ 7
2. DEFINITION ...................................................................................................................................................... 7
3. CODES, STANDARD, AND REFERENCES ..................................................................................................... 7
4. ABBREVIATION ................................................................................................................................................ 9
5. BASIS AND ASSUMPTION .............................................................................................................................. 9
5.1 Fluid Composition .............................................................................................................................................. 9
5.2 Sales Gas Delivery Profile............................................................................................................................... 10
5.3 Environmental Data ......................................................................................................................................... 10
5.4 Pipeline & Piping Data..................................................................................................................................... 11
5.5 Valve Data ....................................................................................................................................................... 13
6. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................ 13
6.1 Software .......................................................................................................................................................... 13
6.2 Senipah – RUV Balikpapan Pipeline Simulation Cases .................................................................................. 13
6.2.1 Base Case ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..13
6.2.2 Ramp Up …………………………………………………………………………………………………………,……14
6.2.3 Pigging ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….,..15
6.2.4 Valve Fail to Open ........................................................................................................................................... 15
6.2.5 Pipeline Packing ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….15
6.3 PPA-BEM 42” Pipeline Simulation Cases ....................................................................................................... 16
6.3.1 Validation …………………………………………………………………………………………………………,…...16
6.3.2 Sudden Closure GOV-0742 ............................................................................................................................ 17
6.3.3 Sudden Closure SDV-115 ............................................................................................................................... 17
6.4 OLGA Simulation Model .................................................................................................................................. 18
6.4.1 Senipah – RUV Balikpapan Pipeline ............................................................................................................... 18
6.4.2 PPA-BEM 42” Pipeline .................................................................................................................................... 19
7. RESULT .......................................................................................................................................................... 20
7.1 Senipah – RUV Balikpapan Pipeline Simulation Results ................................................................................ 20
7.1.1 Base Case ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..20
7.1.2 Ramp Up …………………………………………………………………………………………………………,……22
7.1.3 Pigging ………………………………………………………………………………………………………,………...24
7.1.4 Valve Fail to Open ........................................................................................................................................... 25
7.1.5 Pipeline Packing ………………………………………………………………………………………………………26
7.2 PPA-BEM 42” Pipeline Simulation Cases ....................................................................................................... 37
7.2.1 Validation ………………………………………………………………………………………………………,……...37
7.2.2 Sudden Closure GOV-0742 ............................................................................................................................ 38
7.2.3 Sudden Closure SDV-115 ............................................................................................................................... 40
8. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................................ 41
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 4 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

LIST OF TABLE

Table 5- 1 Gas Composition .....................................................................................................................9

Table 5- 2 Environmental Data ...............................................................................................................10
Table 5- 3 Pipeline Data .........................................................................................................................11
Table 5- 4 Pipeline Design Condition .....................................................................................................11
Table 5- 5 Control Valve CV Value .........................................................................................................13
Table 5- 6 LBCV CV Value .....................................................................................................................13
Table 5- 7 SDV CV Value .......................................................................................................................13
Table 6- 1 Pressure & Temperature at Base Case Conditions ...............................................................13
Table 6- 2 Flowrate at Base Case Conditions .......................................................................................14
Table 6- 3 FCV Operation Control at Ramp Up Conditions.....................................................................14
Table 6- 4 Pressure & Temperature at Ramp Up Conditions ..................................................................14
Table 6- 5 Flowrate at Ramp Up Conditions............................................................................................15
Table 6- 6 Pressure & Temperature at Pigging Conditions .....................................................................15
Table 6- 7 Pressure & Temperature Conditions when Valve Fail to Open ...............................................15
Table 6- 8 Valves to be Closed ..............................................................................................................16
Table 6- 9 Pressure & Temperature Conditions when Pipeline Packing .................................................16
Table 6- 10 Flowrate at Pipeline Packing Conditions ...............................................................................16
Table 6- 11 Pressure & Temperature Conditions for Validation of Actual Operation Data ......................16
Table 6- 12 Flowrate Conditions for Validation of Actual Operation Data ...............................................16
Table 6- 13 Pressure & Temperature Conditions when Sudden Closure GOV-0742 ..............................17
Table 6- 14 Flowrate Conditions Sudden Closure GOV-0742.................................................................17
Table 6- 15 Pressure & Temperature Conditions Sudden Closure SDV-115 ..........................................17
Table 7- 1 FCV Operation Control ..........................................................................................................23
Table 7- 2 Pressure Profile During Valve Fail to Open............................................................................26
Table 7- 3 Simulation Result Pipeline Packing 6 MMSCFD ....................................................................27
Table 7- 4 Simulation Result Pipeline Packing 75 MMSCFD ..................................................................30
Table 7- 5 Simulation Result Pipeline Packing 125 MMSCFD ................................................................33
Table 7- 6 Simulation Result Summary of Pipeline Packing ...................................................................35
Table 7- 7 Simulation Result Validation ..................................................................................................37
Table 7- 8 Simulation Result Pressure Profile at KM7 42” Pipeline .........................................................38
Table 7- 9 Simulation Result Pressure Profile at KM7 42” Pipeline .........................................................39
Table 7- 10 Simulation Result Pressure Profile at KM7 42” Pipeline .......................................................41
Table 8- 1 Overall Summary of Simulation Result ..................................................................................41
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 5 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

LIST OF FIGURE

Figure 1- 1 Pipeline Route from Senipah to Refinery Unit (RU) V Balikpapan......................................... 6

Figure 5- 1 Planned gas Consumption Pertamina RU V Balikpapan ..................................................... 10
Figure 5- 2 Elevation Profile 16” Pipeline [Ref. 16] ................................................................................ 11
Figure 5- 3 Elevation Profile 20” Pipeline [Ref. 17-24] ........................................................................... 12
Figure 5- 4 Elevation Profile 42” Pipeline [Ref. 26] ................................................................................ 12
Figure 5- 5 Elevation Profile ENI ORF Piping [Ref.25] ........................................................................... 12
Figure 6- 1 OLGA Simulation Model Schematic of Senipah-RUV Balikpapan Pipeline .......................... 18
Figure 6- 2 OLGA simulation model schematic of PPA-BEM 42” Pipeline ............................................. 19
Figure 7- 1 Simulation Result Base Case 6 MMSCFD 725 psig ............................................................ 20
Figure 7- 2 Simulation Result Base Case 6 MMSCFD 681.5 psig.......................................................... 20
Figure 7- 3 Simulation Result Base Case 75 MMSCFD 725 psig .......................................................... 21
Figure 7- 4 Simulation Result Base Case 75 MMSCFD 681.5 psig........................................................ 21
Figure 7- 5 Simulation Result Base Case 125 MMSCFD 800 psig......................................................... 22
Figure 7- 6 Simulation Result Ramp Up FCV Operation ....................................................................... 23
Figure 7- 7 Simulation Result Ramp Up Pressure, Liquid Hold-up and Liquid Accumulation ................. 24
Figure 7- 8 Simulation Result Pigging Pig Velocity ................................................................................ 24
Figure 7- 9 Simulation Result Pigging Pressure Profile at Launcher and Receiver and Accumulated
Liquid Profile at Receiver ...................................................................................................................... 25
Figure 7- 10 Simulation Result Valve Fail to Open to Adjust Flowrate From 54 to 75 MMSCFD ............ 26
Figure 7- 12 Simulation Result Pressure Profile at KM7 42” Pipeline by Sudden Closure of GOV-0742 38
Figure 7- 13 Simulation Result Pressure Profile at in Senipah Facility by Sudden Closure of GOV-0742
.............................................................................................................................................................. 39
Figure 7- 14 Simulation Result Flowrate Profile Sudden Closure of GOV-0742 ..................................... 40
Figure 7- 15 Simulation Result Flowrate Profile Sudden Closure of SDV-115 ....................................... 40
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 6 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Project Overview

PT Pertamina Gas plans to deliver gas from Senipah area KP 7.2 PHM Senipah to Badak
pipeline (tap off from 42” PHM export pipeline) that is operated by Pertamina Hulu Mahakam
to PT Pertamina (Persero) Refinery Unit (RU) V Balikpapan, East Kalimantan, to fulfill the gas
demand at Refinery Unit (RU) V Balikpapan and RDMP.
The Onshore Pipeline Senipah – RU V Balikpapan scope will comprise of development of mini
facility in Senipah and RU V Balikpapan area consist of gas metering, pigging facilities, utilities
and an onshore gas pipeline.

Figure 1- 1 Pipeline Route from Senipah to Refinery Unit (RU) V Balikpapan

1.2 Objective
The objectives of this simulation report are:
a. Investigate pressure fluctuation, liquid hold-up, and operation slugging that potential to
be occurred when operation condition (base case).
b. Check the hydrate formation possibilities during steady state condition.
c. Investigate the transient behavior of Pipeline during the following activities:
- Pigging
- Pipeline packing
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 7 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

- When Control Valve in Senipah Metering and Balikpapan Metering is malfunction

(opening less than required).
d. Investigate the transient behavior of 42” Pipeline while the sudden closure of valve at
BEM and tie-in Pertagas.

1.3 Scope
The scope of simulation is the transient analysis of pipeline on the Facilities of Senipah –
Balikpapan Gas Pipeline Project, start from tie-in point at Senipah to Badak KP 7.2 to RU V
Balikpapan Facility.

2. DEFINITION

PROJECT : Jasa Perancangan, Pengadaan, dan Konstruksi

Pembangunan Pipa Gas Senipah – Balikpapan.
COMPANY : PT Pertamina Gas (Pertagas) as the owner of the Project
CONTRACTOR : PT PGAS Solution
VENDOR : The party which supplies materials, equipment, technical
document/drawing, and service to perform the duties by
the CONTRACTOR.
MANUFACTURER : Party which manufactures equipment/materials specified
and ordered by CONTRACTOR (or COMPANY).
SENIPAH : Senipah refers to Senipah area and not to be confused with
PHM Senipah base unless it is mentioned otherwise.

3. CODES, STANDARD, AND REFERENCES

1. SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-DBS-001 Process Design Basis

2. SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-PFD-001 PFD Senipah Processing Facility
3. SNBP-EPC-20-PRO-PFD-001 PFD RU V Balikpapan – Processing Facility
4. SNBP-EPC-10-PRO-PID-001 Senipah P& ID Tie-in Gas
5. SNBP-EPC-10-PRO-PID-002 Senipah P& ID Sales Gas Metering
6. SNBP-EPC-10-PRO-PID-003 Senipah P& ID Pig Launcher
7. SNBP-EPC-10-PRO-PID-004 Senipah P& ID Line Break Valve #1 until #2
8. SNBP-EPC-10-PRO-PID-005 Senipah P& ID Line Break Valve #3 until #5
9. SNBP-EPC-20-PRO-PID-001 RU V Balikpapan P&ID Pig Receiver
10. SNBP-EPC-20-PRO-PID-002 RU V Balikpapan P&ID Gas Receiver
11. SNBP-EPC-20-PRO-PID-003 RU V Balikpapan P&ID Sales Gas Metering
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 8 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

12. SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-RPT-001 Process Simulation Report

13. SNBP-EPC-00-PIP-SPC-002 Specification for Piping Material & Line Class
14. SNBP2-00-PRO-RPT-001 Process Simulation Report Rev. 1 (FEED Document)
15. API RP 14E Design and Installation of Offshore Production Platform
Piping Systems

16. SNBP-EPC-00-PLI-DRW-003 Pipeline Alignment Sheet 16” Pipeline (TP-001 – Senipah

Metering System)
17. SNBP-EPC-00-PLI-DRW-002.1 Pipeline Alignment Sheet 20” Pipeline (Senipah – RU V
Balikpapan) KP 0+000 to KP 10+000
18. SNBP-EPC-00-PLI-DRW-002.2 Pipeline Alignment Sheet 20” Pipeline (Senipah – RU V
Balikpapan) KP 10+000 to KP 20+000
19. SNBP-EPC-00-PLI-DRW-002.3 Pipeline Alignment Sheet 20” Pipeline (Senipah – RU V
Balikpapan) KP 20+000 to KP 30+000
20. SNBP-EPC-00-PLI-DRW-002.4 Pipeline Alignment Sheet 20” Pipeline (Senipah – RU V
Balikpapan) KP 30+000 to KP 40+000
21. SNBP-EPC-00-PLI-DRW-002.5 Pipeline Alignment Sheet 20” Pipeline (Senipah – RU V
Balikpapan) KP 40+000 to KP 50+000
22. SNBP-EPC-00-PLI-DRW-002.6 Pipeline Alignment Sheet 20” Pipeline (Senipah – RU V
Balikpapan) KP 50+000 to KP 60+000
23. SNBP-EPC-00-PLI-DRW-002.7 Pipeline Alignment Sheet 20” Pipeline (Senipah – RU V
Balikpapan) KP 60+000 to KP 70+000
24. SNBP-EPC-00-PLI-DRW-002.8 Pipeline Alignment Sheet 20” Pipeline (Senipah – RU V
Balikpapan) KP 70+000 to KP 75+582
25. 220800DGRVE0335 HIPPS Dynamic Simulation for Jangkrik Production
Beyond 450 MMscfd. 2017. Rev 03. ENI Muara Bakau
B.V.

26. EXP-52-E4-066-C Pipeline Alignment Sheet Senipah to Badak. 2000. Rev

06. Total Indonesie.

27. 220800DGRVE0335_EXDE03 HIPPS Dynamic Simulation for Jangkrik Prodution

Beyond 450 MMscfd
28. 000 Vendor Catalogue
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 9 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

4. ABBREVIATION
Several abbreviations are used hereinafter. The most common ones are listed as
follows:
BEM Badak Export Manifold
BLP Balikpapan
FCV Flow Control Valve
LBCV Line Break Control Valve
FEED Front End Engineering Design
GOV Gas Operated Valve
JKK Jangkrik
KP Kilometer Point
LBCV Line-Break Control Valve
MMscfd Million Standard Cubic feet per day
ORF Onshore Receiving Facilities
PHKT Pertamina Hulu Kalimantan Timur
PHM Pertamina Hulu Mahakam

PHSS Pertamina Hulu Sanga Sanga

PPA Peciko Processing Area
PTG Pertamina Gas
SDV Shut Down Valve
SNP Senipah

5. BASIS AND ASSUMPTION

5.1 Fluid Composition

The flowing gas through 42" export pipeline from Senipah to Badak is a combined gas
from suppliers (PHSS, PHM, PHKT, Chevron and ENI). The gas that will be used for
transient analysis is taken from the results of process simulation [Ref. 12]. The composition
is shown on the table below.
Table 5- 1 Gas Composition

Parameter Unit PPA* ENI* Combined Gas

CO2 %mole 4.756 1.097 2.679
N2 %mole 0.058 0.030 0.042
Methane %mole 87.913 96.401 92.689
Ethane %mole 3.075 1.223 2.024
Propane %mole 2.346 0.641 1.378
i-Butane %mole 0.498 0.133 0.291
n-Butane %mole 0.612 0.181 0.367
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 10 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

Parameter Unit PPA* ENI* Combined Gas

i-Pentane %mole 0.244 0.071 0.146
n-Pentane %mole 0.159 0.053 0.099
Hexane Plus %mole 0.339 0.170 0.243
H2O %mole 0.000 0.000 0.042
Total 100.000 100.000 100.000

5.2 Sales Gas Delivery Profile

Incoming and Outgoing Pipelines will follow the following scenarios based on the gas
flowrateto be delivered to Pertamina RU V Balikpapan via Senipah – RU V onshore
pipeline [Ref. 1]

RDMP
Existing

120 125
104 110
82 75
71 60 70
52 54
46 46 35
25
0 0 6 36
46 46 46 15 46 47 50 50 50 50
21
Q1-Q2 Q3-Q4 Q1-Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2025-
2022 2022 2023 2023 2023 2024 2024 2024 2024 2027

Figure 5- 1 Planned gas Consumption Pertamina RU V Balikpapan

Notes:
1. by Senipah – Balikpapan new pipeline
2. Full capacity scenario of 125 MMscfd via Senipah – Balikpapan new pipeline will be supplied
by LNG from Badak
3. Pressure at RU V tie-in is 597 psig (requirement pressure for H2 plant in RU V Balikpapan

The minimum gas flowrate to be delivered to Pertamina RU V Balikpapan is 6 MMscfd.

5.3 Environmental Data

The following environmental data is used on simulation [Ref.1].

Table 5- 2 Environmental Data
Parameter Value Unit
oF
Air Temperature 75 - 95
Wind Velocity 4.27 – 30.18 ft/s
Relative Humidity 85 %
Ground Conductivity 0.78 (onshore) W/m.K
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 11 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

5.4 Pipeline & Piping Data

The pipelines and piping data are shown below [Ref.1, 16-24].
Table 5- 3 Pipeline Data

Pipeline Wall
Length Roughness
Pipeline No. Dia. Thickness Material
(m) (in)
(in) (mm)
16” Pipeline 1280 16 12.7 0.0018 Carbon Steel
20” Pipeline 77000 20 12.7 0.0018 Carbon Steel
RUV Piping 1700 20 26.19 0.0018 Carbon Steel
42” Pipeline 82000 42 19.05 0.0018 Carbon Steel
ENI ORF Piping 400 18 9.55 0.0018 Carbon Steel
SAPI Piping 10 18 9.55 0.0018 Carbon Steel

The pipeline & piping design pressure are detailed below [Ref.1, 16].
Table 5- 4 Pipeline Design Condition
Design Pressure Design Temperature
Pipeline
(psig) (oF)
16” Pipeline 1350 150
20” Pipeline, RUV piping 900 150
42” Pipeline, ENI ORF Piping,
1362.7 150
SAPI Piping

The elevation profile of pipeline and piping are presented in figures below.

Figure 5- 2 Elevation Profile 16” Pipeline [Ref. 16]

 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 12 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

Figure 5- 3 Elevation Profile 20” Pipeline [Ref. 17-24]

Figure 5- 4 Elevation Profile 42” Pipeline [Ref. 26]

Figure 5- 5 Elevation Profile ENI ORF Piping [Ref.25]

 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 13 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

5.5 Valve Data

The valves to be used as control valve and SDV are shown in the table below [Ref.28].
Table 5- 5 Control Valve CV Value
FV- Opening (%) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
101A/B/C CV 6.5 23 45 83 138 220 325 445 510 560
FV- Opening (%) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
201A/B/C CV 6.5 23 45 83 138 220 325 445 510 560

Table 5- 6 LBCV CV Value

LBCV108/ Opening (%) 11 22 33 44 56 67 78 89 100
110 CV 107 444 1066 2089 3744 6522 11511 20668 64749

Table 5- 7 SDV CV Value

Opening Time Closing Time
Valve CV
(s) (s)
SDV-101 37200 64 16
SDV-109 59000 80 20
SDV-201 59000 80 20
SDV-209 9100 64 16
SDV-115 35000 45 15

6. METHODOLOGY

6.1 Software

The software used in this flow assurance study is SPT Group’s OLGA version 2017.2.0
withMultiflash 6.1 to generate the fluid database.

6.2 Senipah – RUV Balikpapan Pipeline Simulation Cases

6.2.1 Base Case

Base cases are transient simulation for steady state operation. The objectives are to
investigate pressure fluctuation, liquid hold-up, operation slugging that potential to be
occurred and FCV operation to control deignated flowrate.
Table 6- 1 Pressure & Temperature at Base Case Conditions
Parameter Value Unit
Inlet Pressure 6 & 75 MMSCFD (note 1) 725 & 681.5 psig
Inlet Pressure 125 MMSCFD (note 2) 800 psig
o
Inlet Temperature (note 1) 116.6 F
Destination Pressure (note 3) 597.7 psig
Notes:
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 14 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

1. Pressure and temperature that can be supplied by PPA Senipah and ENI [Ref. 14]
2. Pressure supplied for 125MMSCFD operation is not sufficient refer to Process Simulation Report
[Ref.12] so the pressure is assummed for simulation only
3. Destination pressure required at downstream pipeline [Ref. 12]

Flow boundary is considered based on operating flowrate [Ref.12] as shown in the

followingtable.
Table 6- 2 Flowrate at Base Case Conditions
Parameter Value Unit
6 MMSCFD
Operating flowrate 75 MMSCFD
125 MMSCFD

6.2.2 Ramp Up
Ramp Up is performed to investigate pressure fluctuation, liquid hold-up, operation
sluggingthat potential to be occurred and FCV operation to control deignated flowrate. The
FCV will be operated based on set point flowrate to be delivered. The control philosophy
of the FCV simplified at the table below.
Table 6- 3 FCV Operation Control at Ramp Up Conditions
Set-Point Flowrate Set Point Target (MMSCFD)
(MMSCFD) FCV-A FCV-B
6 6 0
35 35 0
54 54 0
75 37.5 37.5
125 62.5 62.5

Table 6- 4 Pressure & Temperature at Ramp Up Conditions

Parameter Value Unit
Inlet Pressure (note 1) 725 psig
oF
Inlet Temperature (note 1) 116.6
Destination Pressure (note 3) 597.7 psig
Notes:
1. Pressure and temperature that can be supplied by PPA Senipah and ENI [Ref. 14]
2. Destination pressure required at downstream pipeline [Ref. 12]
Flow boundary is considered based on operating flowrate [Ref.12] as shown in the
following table.
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 15 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

Table 6- 5 Flowrate at Ramp Up Conditions

Parameter Value Unit
6 MMSCFD
34 MMSCFD
Operating flowrate 54 MMSCFD
75 MMSCFD
125 MMSCFD

6.2.3 Pigging
Pigging is performed to remove liquid accumulation in the pipeline or for cleaning purpose.
The objective is to identify the optimum flowrate to meet pig velocity criteria of 1 – 4 m/s
andto investigate the slug generated during pigging.
Table 6- 6 Pressure & Temperature at Pigging Conditions
Parameter Value Unit
Inlet Pressure (note 1) 725 psig
oF
Inlet temperature (note 1) 116.6
Destination Pressure (note 3) 597.7 psig
Notes:
1. Pressure and temperature that can be supplied by PPA Senipah and ENI [Ref. 14]
2. Destination pressure required at downstream pipeline [Ref. 12]
Flow boundary is decided during simulation to achieve pigging velocity criteria 1 - 4 m/s.

6.2.4 Valve Fail to Open

The objective to investigate the pressure profile during the increase of flowrate at
destination but the Flow Control Valve stuck to increase the opening.
Table 6- 7 Pressure & Temperature Conditions when Valve Fail to Open
Parameter Value Unit
Inlet Pressure (note 1) 725 psig
oF
Inlet temperature (note 1) 116.6
Destination Pressure (note 3) 597.7 psig
Notes:
1. Pressure and temperature that can be supplied by PPA Senipah and ENI [Ref. 14]
2. Destination pressure required at downstream pipeline [Ref. 12]
The simulation uses an increase in flowrate from 54 MMSCFD to be 75 MMSCFD at
destination.

6.2.5 Pipeline Packing

The objective to investigate the pressure profile after sudden closure of valve and to
providethe response time data during the emergency situation.
List of valves to be closed is listed below.
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 16 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

Table 6- 8 Valves to be Closed

Valve Location
SDV-115 Upstream 16” pipeline
SDV-101 Downstream 16” pipeline
SDV-109 Upstream 20” pipeline
SDV-201 Downstream 20” pipeline
SDV-209 Upstream RUV Balikpapan piping
LBCV-110 20” pipeline KP 15.6
LBCV-108 20” pipeline KP 68.4

Table 6- 9 Pressure & Temperature Conditions when Pipeline Packing

Parameter Value Unit
Inlet Pressure (note 1) 725 psig
oF
Inlet temperature (note 1) 116.6
Destination Pressure (note 2) 597.7 psig
Notes:
1. Pressure and temperature that can be supplied by PPA Senipah and ENI [Ref. 14]
2. Destination pressure required at downstream pipeline [Ref. 12]
Flow boundary is considered based on operating flowrate [Ref.12] as shown in the following
table.
Table 6- 10 Flowrate at Pipeline Packing Conditions
Parameter Value Unit
6 MMSCFD
Operating flowrate 75 MMSCFD
125 MMSCFD

6.3 PPA-BEM 42” Pipeline Simulation Cases

6.3.1 Validation
The simulation is performed by using the actual operation data then compare the result to
assure that the data input to this simulation is adequate to perform further simulations.
Table 6- 11 Pressure & Temperature Conditions for Validation of Actual Operation Data
Parameter Value Unit
oF
Inlet Temperature (note 1) 75
Destination Pressure (note 2) 48 Bar.a

Table 6- 12 Flowrate Conditions for Validation of Actual Operation Data

Parameter Value Unit
ENI 257 MMSCFD
Operating flowrate (note 2) PPA 234.6 MMSCFD
SAPI 3.5 MMSCFD
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 17 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

Notes:
1. The temperature of source considers as ambient
2. The destination pressure and flowrate refer to actual data “Production rate (11/06/22)”

6.3.2 Sudden Closure GOV-0742

The objective to investigate the pressure profile after sudden closure of GOV-0742 and to
provide the response time data during the emergency situation.

Table 6- 13 Pressure & Temperature Conditions when Sudden Closure GOV-0742

Parameter Value Unit
oF
Inlet Temperature (note 1) 75
To BEM Destination Pressure (note 2) 48 Bar.a

Table 6- 14 Flowrate Conditions Sudden Closure GOV-0742

Parameter Value Unit Remarks
From ENI 590.3 MMSCFD Note 2
From PPA 187.7 MMSCFD Note 2
Operating flowrate
From SAPI 9 MMSCFD Note 2
To Pertagas 6 & 125 MMSCFD Note 3
Notes:
1. The temperature of source considers as ambient.
2. The destination pressure and flowrate refer to actual data “Export Gas Data from PHI at April 2021”.
3. The flowrate to Pertagas refer process simulation report [Ref. 12] as minimum and maximum flowrate.

6.3.3 Sudden Closure SDV-115

The objective to investigate the pressure profile after sudden closure of SDV-115 and to
provide the response time data during the emergency situation.

Table 6- 15 Pressure & Temperature Conditions Sudden Closure SDV-115

Parameter Value Unit
oF
Inlet Temperature (note 1) 75
To BEM Destination Pressure (note 2) 48 Bar.a

Table 6-16 Flowrate Conditions Sudden Closure SDV-115

Parameter Value Unit Remarks
From ENI 590.3 MMSCFD Note 2
From PPA 187.7 MMSCFD Note 2
Operating flowrate
From SAPI 9 MMSCFD Note 2
To Pertagas 125 MMSCFD Note 3
Notes:
1. The temperature of source considers as ambient.
2. The destination pressure and flowrate refer to actual data “Export Gas Data from PHI at April 2021”.
3. The flowrate to Pertagas 125 MMSCFD is taken to be able to see the significant change in
pressure and flowrate of 42” pipeline.
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 18 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

6.4 OLGA Simulation Model

6.4.1 Senipah – RUV Balikpapan Pipeline

The OLGA simulation model schematic of Senipah-RUV Balikpapan Pipeline is shown below.

Figure 6- 1 OLGA Simulation Model Schematic of Senipah-RUV Balikpapan Pipeline

 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 19 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

6.4.2 PPA-BEM 42” Pipeline

The OLGA simulation model schematic of PPA-BEM 42” Pipeline is shown below.

Figure 6- 2 OLGA simulation model schematic of PPA-BEM 42” Pipeline

 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 20 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

7. RESULT

7.1 Senipah – RUV Balikpapan Pipeline Simulation Results

7.1.1 Base Case

The transient simulation for steady state operation was performed to determine the pressure
fluctuation, liquid hold-up, operation slugging that potential to be occurred and FCV operation
to control designated flowrate. The following section discuss the result from the stable
operation condition of the three (3) different flowrate case (6, 75, 125 MMSCFD) during
mminimum and maximum pressure (min. 681.5 psig and max. 725 psig).
Base Case 6 MMSCFD
The simulation result of base case at 6 MMSCFD are shown in the following figure.

Figure 7- 1 Simulation Result Base Case 6 MMSCFD 725 psig

Figure 7- 2 Simulation Result Base Case 6 MMSCFD 681.5 psig

 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 21 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

From figure above, observed that the pressure during steady state condition at pressure
supply 681.5 psig and 725 psig, the pressure is stable pressure at 16” pipeline, 20” pipeline
and RUV pipeline. The liquid holds up and accumulated liquid is not present at the 20”
pipeline which means slugging issue at the pipeline is not expected during the operation
case.

Base Case 75 MMSCFD

The simulation result of base case at 75 MMSCFD are shown in the following figure.

Figure 7- 3 Simulation Result Base Case 75 MMSCFD 725 psig

Figure 7- 4 Simulation Result Base Case 75 MMSCFD 681.5 psig

 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 22 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

From figure above, observed that the pressure during steady state condition at pressure
supply 681.5 psig and 725 psig, the pressure is stable at 16” pipeline, 20” pipeline and RUV
pipeline. The liquid holds up and accumulated liquid is not present at the 20” pipeline which
means slugging issue at the pipeline is not expected during the operation case.

Base Case 125 MMSCFD

As explained at section 6.2.1 that the inlet pressure for 125 MMSCFD is 800 psig. The
simulation result of base case at 125 MMSCFD are shown in the following figure.

Figure 7- 5 Simulation Result Base Case 125 MMSCFD 800 psig

Observed from picture above, the pressure of 16” pipeline, 20” pipeline and RUV pipeline are
stable. The flowrate is decrease because the initial pressure set at 800 psig then while the
control valve regulating, the flowrate is decreasing until reach set point 125 MMSCFD. During
process, there are no liquid hold up and accumulated liquid observed at 20” pipeline so that
it is expected there are no slugging during the steady state operation.

7.1.2 Ramp Up
During ramp up operation, the FCV at Senipah having important role to control the flowrate
of sales gas. As explained before on section 6.3 about the FCV control philosophy, the
flowrate profile during the ramp up operation shown in the figure below.
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 23 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

75 MMSCFD

125 MMSCFD
54 MMSCFD
35 MMSCFD
6 MMSCFD

Figure 7- 6 Simulation Result Ramp Up FCV Operation

It is observed from figure above that the operation of FCV is smooth enough, there are no
fluctuation during regulating process. The flowrate also the same, there are fluctuation on
flowrate of gas. The flowrate smoth following the ramping up set point. The result of setting
FCV are shown in the table below.
Table 7- 1 FCV Operation Control
Set-Point Flowrate Set Point Target (MMSCFD) Setting / Valve Opening (%)
(MMSCFD) FCV-A FCV-B FCV-A FCV-B
6 6 0 12.8 0
35 35 0 36.1 0
54 54 0 46.8 0
75 37.5 37.5 40.7 40.7
125 62.5 62.5 100 100

During the 100% opening, the FCV is regulating to 125 MMSCFD but could not reach it and
stop at 115 MMSCFD because insufficient pressure supply.
Then to investigate the pressure, liquid hold up and slugging at the pipeline, it can be
observed at the figure below.
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 24 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

Figure 7- 7 Simulation Result Ramp Up Pressure, Liquid Hold-up and Liquid Accumulation

During the ramp up process, the pressure is quite stable. During FCV set to 125 MMSCFD,
the pressure at RUV Balikpapan increase because the FCV fully open to chase the flowrate
set point and result in increase of pressure (615 psig). There is no liquid hold up and
accumulated liquid at 20” pipeline so the slugging issue is not expected during ramp up
operation.

7.1.3 Pigging
Pigging operation shall comply with velocity criteria 1-4 m/s. To achieve velocity criteria, it is
simulated at 75 MMSCFD and the result shown in the table below.

Figure 7- 8 Simulation Result Pigging Pig Velocity

 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 25 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

From figure above, the pig launch at 5000s and receive at 31110s or the pigging duration is
about 7.2 hours. The velocity average is 2.9 m/s and comply with velocity criteria.
The pressure profile at pig launcher & receiver and accumulated liquid at pig receiver shown
in the figure below.

Figure 7- 9 Simulation Result Pigging Pressure Profile at Launcher and Receiver and Accumulated
Liquid Profile at Receiver

At the moment of pig launch, there is peak pressure at pig launcher. The peak pressure is
660.4 psig and below pipe design pressure. Then during the receiving at pig receiver, the
pressure only raises to 606 psig and the decrease along with the receive of pig. There is no
surge pressure during the pigging and the pressure is quite stable. No accumulated liquid is
observed during the pigging.

7.1.4 Valve Fail to Open

During the operation, valve could be failed to open to adapt with higher set point flowrate and
it could lead to upset process at the downstream (RUV Balikpapan). To investigate it, the
simulation is performed to deal with this incident. Below is the figure of FCV that fail to adjust
the flowrate from 54 to 75 MMSCFD.
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 26 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

Increasing demand flowrate at RUV Balikpapan from 54 to 75 MMSCFD

Figure 7- 10 Simulation Result Valve Fail to Open to Adjust Flowrate From 54 to 75 MMSCFD

From figure above, the flowrate changes at 5000s from 54 to 75 MMSCFD. The increasing
of flowrate result in decreasing of pressure at RUV Balikpapan. It is indicated that if the valve
fails to open then the pressure to RUV Balikpapan will decrease. The pressure profile
describes on the table below.
Table 7- 2 Pressure Profile During Valve Fail to Open
Pressure Decreasing Time (s)
Pressure (psig)
Percentage (%)
95 567.8 327
90 537.9 4970
85 508.0 11135
80 478.2 18669
75 448.3 28031

7.1.5 Pipeline Packing

Packing of pipeline happen if there is a blockage on flowrate that can be caused by sudden
closure of valve. During the packing simulation, the Flow Control Valve at Senipah Facility is
regulating to control the flow following the actual operation. The result of pipeline packing
explained in the section below.
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 27 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

6MMSCFD Pipeline Packing Result

Table 7- 3 Simulation Result Pipeline Packing 6 MMSCFD
Valve
Flowrate & Pressure Profile
Close

SDV-
115

SDV-
101

SDV-
109
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 28 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

Valve
Flowrate & Pressure Profile
Close

LBCV-
110

LBCV-
108

SDV-
201
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 29 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

Valve
Flowrate & Pressure Profile
Close

SDV-
209

Form the table above, observed that after the valve close, the flowrate at RUV-Balikpapan is
oscillating then become stable after a period of time at no flow condition. Comparing with
pressure, there are no significant change in pressure during the flow oscillating period.
Need to note that the Flow Control Valve is operating during the packing process to control
the flowrate. While the valve is closing, it can be seen that the FCV opening is increase to
adjust the flowrate then stuck at fully open condition. The operating of control valve is smooth
to regulate the flow.
With the closure of valve, the pressure at upstream valve is increasing to reach the supplied
pressure while the pressure at downstream valve is remain the same and stable because the
FCV operate to control the flowrate. No surge pressure is observed in the simulation so the
surge pressure is not expected to be happen during packing process.
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 30 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

75 MMSCFD Pipeline Packing Result

Table 7- 4 Simulation Result Pipeline Packing 75 MMSCFD
Valve
Flowrate & Pressure Profile
Close

SDV-
115

SDV-
101

SDV-
109
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 31 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

Valve
Flowrate & Pressure Profile
Close

LBCV-
110

LBCV-
108

SDV-
201
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 32 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

Valve
Flowrate & Pressure Profile
Close

SDV-
209

The oscillating flowrate is quite stable and faster to reach stable condition. Comparing with
pressure, there are no significant change in pressure during the flow oscillating period. The
flowrate is decreasing slower when the SDV at upstream side of 20” pipeline is close rather
than at downstream side. The flowrate at RUV-Balikpapan drop significantly fast when the
SDV at the downstream side of 20” pipeline is close.
The Flow Control Valve is operating during the packing process to control the flowrate. While
the valve is closing, it can be seen that the FCV opening is increase to adjust the flowrate
then stuck at fully open condition. The operating of control valve is smooth to regulate the
flow.
With the closure of valve, the pressure at upstream valve is increasing to reach the supplied
pressure while the pressure at downstream valve is remain the same and stable because the
FCV operate to control the flowrate. No surge pressure is observed in the simulation so the
surge pressure is not expected to be happen during packing process.
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 33 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

125 MMSCFD Pipeline Packing Result

Table 7- 5 Simulation Result Pipeline Packing 125 MMSCFD
Valve
Flowrate & Pressure Profile
Close

SDV-
115

SDV-
101

SDV-
109
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 34 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

Valve
Flowrate & Pressure Profile
Close

LBCV-
110

LBCV-
108

SDV-
201
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 35 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

Valve
Flowrate & Pressure Profile
Close

SDV-
209

The oscillating flowrate is quite stable and faster to reach stable condition. Comparing with
pressure, there are no significant change in pressure during the flow oscillating period. The
flowrate is decreasing slower when the SDV at upstream side of 20” pipeline is close rather
than at downstream side. The flowrate at RUV-Balikpapan drop significantly fast when the
SDV at the downstream side of 20” pipeline is close.
The Flow Control Valve is operating during the packing process to control the flowrate. While
the valve is closing, it can be seen that the FCV opening is increase to adjust the flowrate
then stuck at fully open condition. The operating of control valve is smooth to regulate the
flow.
With the closure of valve, the pressure at upstream valve is increasing to reach the supplied
pressure while the pressure at downstream valve is remain the same and stable because the
FCV operate to control the flowrate. No surge pressure is observed in the simulation so the
surge pressure is not expected to be happen during packing process.

Pipeline Packing Summary

Here, the simulation results of pipeline packing are summarized in the table below.
Table 7- 6 Simulation Result Summary of Pipeline Packing
Flowrate Maximum Pressure (psig)
Reach
SDV Zero at Available
Closing RUV response In Out In Out
Flowrate SDV Time Time Time Senipah Senipah Balikpapan Balikpapan
(MMSCFD) Close (s) (s) (s) Facility Facility Facility Facility
SDV115 2000 2535 535 725.04 725.46 597.55 597.70
6 SDV101 2000 2535 535 725.04 725.46 597.55 597.70
SDV109 2000 2550 550 725.04 725.46 597.55 597.70
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 36 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

Flowrate Maximum Pressure (psig)

Reach
SDV Zero at Available
Closing RUV response In Out In Out
Flowrate SDV Time Time Time Senipah Senipah Balikpapan Balikpapan
(MMSCFD) Close (s) (s) (s) Facility Facility Facility Facility
LBCV110 2000 2417 418 724.98 716.93 597.55 597.70
LBCV108 2000 2072 73 724.98 623.67 597.60 597.71
SDV201 2000 2042 43 724.98 620.92 597.58 597.70
SDV209 2000 2027 28 724.98 620.35 621.33 597.70
SDV115 2000 4515 2515 725.34 647.05 605.53 598.67
SDV101 2000 4472 2472 726.22 647.06 605.53 598.67
SDV109 2000 4442 2442 725.49 728.72 605.53 598.67
75 LBCV110 2000 3706 1706 725.33 725.79 605.53 598.67
LBCV108 2000 2132 132 725.31 725.72 605.53 598.67
SDV201 2000 2027 27 725.30 725.71 605.53 598.67
SDV209 2000 2042 42 725.30 725.71 726.99 598.67
SDV115 2000 6016 4017 801.31 725.23 619.15 600.36
SDV101 2000 5971 3971 801.72 725.22 619.15 600.36
SDV109 2000 5926 3927 800.96 802.75 619.15 600.36
125 LBCV110 2000 4834 2834 800.92 801.38 619.15 600.36
LBCV108 2000 2191 192 800.89 801.35 619.14 600.36
SDV201 2000 2055 56 800.89 801.34 619.14 600.36
SDV209 2000 2025 26 800.89 801.34 802.76 600.36

Generally, the available response time is increasing by the increase of flowrate. When SDV-
209 located at out Balikpapan Facility is sudden close, the minimum available response time
varies from 42-38 seconds. It is better to apply the interlock system if this upset condition
happen to minimize the impact to RUV Balikpapan process. The phenomena are similar at
SDV-201 & LBCV-108, the available response time is very short below 4 minutes so it is
necessary to apply the interlock system at RUV Balikpapan process. It is very different while
the SDV at upstream side of 20” pipeline is close. The available response time is long enough
ranging from 400 – 6000 seconds.
Observed from maximum pressure result of the table above, the maximum pressure is
ranging from 724 – 728 psig. The packing operations are safe to be performed because the
maximum pressure is below the 20” pipeline and 16” pipeline design pressure.
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 37 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

7.2 PPA-BEM 42” Pipeline Simulation Cases

7.2.1 Validation

The OLGA simulation model is created using the boundary data presented at section 6.3.1
which is the actual production data. The result data that pressure at KP.7 will be compared
with inlet pressure of Pertagas Pipeline stated on process design basis that the operating
pressure is 681.5 – 725 psig [Ref.1]. The simulation result presented on the figure below.

Figure 7-11 OLGA Simulation Result for Validation 42” Pipeline

From the figure above, the pressure at Pertagas 42” tie-in point is 50.13 bar.a or 722.12 psig
that within the supplied pressure 681.5 – 725 psig refer to process simulation [Ref. 12]. The
detaile result data is available at the table below.
Table 7- 7 Simulation Result Validation
Flowrate Pressure
Parameter
(MMSCFD) (Bar.a) (psig)
ENI 257 50.39 726.0
Input PPA 234.6 50.21 723.4
SAPI 3.5 50.15 722.5
KM7 498 50.13 722.2
Node
PTG Tie-in 498 50.12 722.1
Output BEM 498 48.04 691.5
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 38 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

7.2.2 Sudden Closure GOV-0742

During the packing simulation, the flowrate to Pertagas Pipeline use 2 kind of flowrate, 6 &
125 MMSCFD. The sudden closure of GOV-0742 closing at 60s. The pressure profile at KM7
42” pipeline simulation result shown in the figure below.

92.7 barg

88 barg

Figure 7- 11 Simulation Result Pressure Profile at KM7 42” Pipeline by Sudden Closure of GOV-0742

Form the figure above, the dynamic result for sudden closure of GOV 0742 is summarized in
the table below.
Table 7- 8 Simulation Result Pressure Profile at KM7 42” Pipeline
Time (s)
Event
6 MMSCFD 125 MMSCFD
GOV-0742 Sudden Closure 60 60
KM 7-PTG Tie-in reach pressure 88
4115 5069
bar.g (HIPPS set pressure)
KM 7-PTG Tie-in reach pressure 92.7
4636 5705
bar.g (pipeline design pressure)
Available HIPPS reaction time 521 636

At the Pertagas pipeline also protected by SDV. The SDV available response time to deal
with sudden closure of GOV-0742 is shown in the figure below.
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 39 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

92.7 barg

88 barg

Figure 7- 12 Simulation Result Pressure Profile at in Senipah Facility by Sudden Closure of GOV-
0742

The result summarized in the table below.

Table 7- 9 Simulation Result Pressure Profile at KM7 42” Pipeline
Time (s)
Event
6 MMSCFD 125 MMSCFD
GOV-0742 Sudden Closure 60 60
Inlet Senipah Facility reach pressure
4477 5152
88 bar.g (HIPPS set pressure)
Inlet Senipah Facility reach pressure
5005 5781
92.7 bar.g (pipeline design pressure)
Available HIPPS reaction time 528 629

Then investigating the flowrate profile at KM 7 and inlet Senipah Facility, the simulation result
shown in the figure below.
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 40 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

Figure 7- 13 Simulation Result Flowrate Profile Sudden Closure of GOV-0742

Observed that by sudden closure of GOV-0742, there are no significant change of flowrate
to PTG facility. The flowrate fluctuation happens on 42” pipeline.

7.2.3 Sudden Closure SDV-115

To investigate the pressure surge that could be happen in the 42” pipeline, the simulation
result is shown in the figure below.

Figure 7- 14 Simulation Result Flowrate Profile Sudden Closure of SDV-115

Observed that the pressure at tie-in point show no surge pressure. The pressure is stable
following the pressure of 42” pipeline. The blockage flowrate to Pertagas pipeline rise the
pressure of 42” pipeline from 50.2 barg to 51.9 barg. No emergency response is necessaryto
deal with this event. The result summarized in the following table.
 JASA PERANCANGAN, PENGADAAN,
DAN KONSTRUKSI PEMBANGUNAN PIPA
GAS SENIPAH – BALIKPAPAN
Document No.
ID-SNP-SOME-2300-510007-P-SNP- Date: 19/12/2022
Rev.
22-001 FLOW ASSURANCE REPORT
Document No.
0.1
Page 41 of 41
SNBP-EPC-00-PRO-CAL-003

Table 7- 10 Simulation Result Pressure Profile at KM7 42” Pipeline

Event Value Unit
SDV-115 close 60 s
Pressure stable at KM7 42” pipeline 7136 s
Pressure at KM7 42” pipeline before SDV close 50.2 barg
Pressure at KM7 42” pipeline after SDV close 51.9 barg

8. CONCLUSION

The conclusion of each case summarized in the table below.

Table 8- 1 Overall Summary of Simulation Result
Senipah - RUV Balikpapan Pipeline
Base Case During the base case, the flowrate and pressure is stable. No surgepressure,
liquid hold up and slugging is observed during steady state operation. The
normal operation considered as safe operation.
Ramp Up During ramp up process, the FCV is smooth while regulating the flowrate. No
surge pressure, liquid hold up and slugging is observed during ramp up
operation and considered as safe operation.
Pigging The optimum flowrate for pigging operation is 75 MMSCFD comply with
velocity criteria. From simulation result concluded that no slug and liquid hold
up is observed. The pressure and flowrate are stable during pigging
operation.
FCV Fail to While the FCV fail to adjust the flowrate, there is ~6 minutes available time
Open to deal with this incident before the pressure fall to 95% set pressure at RUV
Balikpapan. The available response time is quite enough for operator to
response the incident by manual override to operate the standby FCV.
Pipeline During valve sudden closure, there are no surge pressure at the pipelines.
Packing The operation is considered as safe.
PPA - BEM 42” Pipeline
Sudden During the worst condition, the available HIPPS reaction time before the
Closure pressure reach design pressure is 521 second or around 8 minutes.
GOV-0742 Comparing with previous HIPPS report [Ref. 16, page 41], the available
response time (521 s) is safe if it is considered with HIPPS response time as
per datasheet (3s).
Sudden During the closure of SDV-115 at Pertagas Tie-in, the operating pressure
Closure raise from 50.2 to 51.9 barg. No surge pressure is observed so the closing
SDV-115 SDV-115 operation is safe that the maximum pressure is below design
pressure (92.7).