Warehouse Report
Warehouse Report
CHAPTER - 1
1.1 INTRODUCTION
These buildings require large and clear areas unobstructed by the columns. The large
floor area provides sufficient flexibility and facility for later changes in the production layout
without major building alterations. Special types of industrial buildings are steel mill buildings
used for manufacture of heavy machines, production of power etc. The function of the industrial
building dictates the degree of sophistication. A structure is a collective result of idea, design,
material, manpower, time, finance etc. As need is the mother of invention, similarly, type of
construction and its proper required design is a necessity.
This is made with the general idea on how a Pre-Engineered industrial building that is our
warehouse should be designed in a seismic zone 3 carrying solar panels for it to be steady and
economical. This also includes various parts of steel structure and loads which affects our
structure such as dead load, live load, collateral load etc. and it is effectively shown with the use
of STAAD PRO. we have gone through each and every part of the structures and have done the
redesigning of those structures that undergo a lot of stress .by increasing the cross-section
properties of truss we came across a fact that it can increase the second moment of area.
Keywords: STAAD PRO, Steel Structure, Solar Panel, Warehouse, AUTO CAD, Zone3.
Pre-engineered buildings are now a widely known term and PEB warehouses are no
exception. It was studied by G Durga Rama Naidu at that It was found that PEB was economical
compared to CSB and it is noticed that with the increase of bay spacing up to certain limit there
is reduction of weight of PEB and further increase in bay spacing makes the weight heavier. It
was then concluded that PEB increases the structure quality, reduced weight, quality control,
reduction of steel quantity.
S.D Charkha concluded that why it is necessary to optimize the steel building using PEB
and it is because PEB reduces the steel quantity, reduction of steel quantity reduces the dead load
and reduction of dead load reduces the foundation size and the PEB usage increase aesthetic
view. Milind Bhojkar P on comparison study of Pre-engineered building and conventional steel
building based on cost and time effectiveness observed that PEB roof structure is almost 26%
lighter than the conventional steel building and PEB building cost is 30% lesser than the cost of
CSB. Vrushali Bahadu et al. conducted the comparison of A-type and saw tooth type truss and
portal frame for industrial shed using STAAD-pro and found that Saw tooth type industrial shed
require less steel as compared to the other two which means it is economically good, the saw
tooth type truss is than compared with PEB. It is found PEB is the most economical.
CHAPTER - 2
M. Suneetha completed a numerical study and concluded that Weight of single Truss utilizing
Angle and Pipe both is less compared to PEB yet because of Weight of Channel Purlin, Weight
of Steel Truss Building is on higher side.
C.M. Meera made a comparative study between Pre-Engineered Building (PEB) and
Conventional Steel Building (CSB) and analyzing the design frames using structural analysis and
design software STAAD PRO.
Subhrakant Mohakul designed an Industrial warehouse and did a thorough study of behavior of
members due to effect of failure at connecting joints.
Manan D. Maisuri stated that the consumption of steel of whole industrial building can be
reduced by deciding appropriate geometry of truss and by using hollow steel section with
compared to conventional steel section. Thus, stating tube sections are most economical.
Research paper by Shaiv Parikh emphasis on the importance of compression members and
gives brief description about the characteristics and the behavior of steel compression members.
Jayaraman presents a study on behavior and economical of roof trusses and channel section
purlins by comparison of LSM and WSM. Yash Patel states the importance of tubular sections
and concludes the economic advantages of tubular sections.
G Durga Rama Naidu. analyzed the CSB and PEB, in which the PEB was analyzed for the
varied increase in bay spacing. IS 875-part 3 was considered for analysis. It was found that PEB
was economical compared to CSB and it is noticed that with the increase of bay spacing up to
certain limit there is reduction of weight of PEB and further increase in bay spacing makes the
weight heavier.
S.D Charkha concluded that why it is necessary to optimize the steel building using PEB and it
is because PEB reduces the steel quantity, reduction of steel quantity reduces the dead load and
reduction of dead load reduces the foundation size and the PEB usage increase aesthetic view.
Milind Bhojkar P on comparison study of Pre-engineered building and conventional steel
building based on cost and time effectiveness observed that PEB roof structure is almost 26%
lighter than the conventional steel building and PEB building cost is 30% lesser than the cost of
CSB. Vrushali Bahadu et al. conducted the comparison of A-type and saw tooth type truss and
portal frame for industrial shed using STAAD-pro and found that Saw tooth type industrial shed
require less steel as compared to the other two which means it is economically good, the saw
tooth type truss is than compared with PEB. It is found PEB is the most economical.
C. M. Meera, this work clearly communicates that PEB structures can be simply developed
using simple design techniques that adhere to national standards. In light of the findings, it can
be stated that PEB structures are superior to CSB structures in terms of cost effectiveness,
construction speed, and erection simplicity. The report also provides easy and cost-effective
options for PEBS preliminary design concepts. The illustration aids in the comprehension of the
PEB concept design approach.
Anisha T. Goswami, Shalaka Sharma, PEB is being used more frequently as a result of earlier
advancements, although its use is not uniform across the building industry. In comparison to
conventional-to-conventional buildings, PEB structures may be simply created using simple
design techniques in accordance with country norms, are energy efficient, quick to construct,
save money, are sustainable, and most importantly, are reliable. As a result, the PEB technique
must be deployed and investigated for mire outcomes.
G Durga Rama Naidu at that It was found that PEB was economical compared to CSB and it is
noticed that with the increase of bay spacing up to certain limit there is reduction of weight of
PEB and further increase in bay spacing makes the weight heavier. It was then concluded that
PEB increases the structure quality, reduced weight, quality control, reduction of steel quantity.
K.Prabin Kumar, D. Sunny Prakash, Indian code regulations were used to calculate the
various loads occurring on the structure. After that, load combinations were created, and the
foundation was designed based on the loads operating on the structure's base. The hanger was
designed, and the structure was analyzed manually and with the help of the STAAD.PRO
program. The results revealed that the hanger designs were similar. Both methods produced
deflection values that were less than the calculated allowed deflection. As a result, the structure
is safe against deflection.
Sandeep Sathe in their “A state of art review on analysis and design of preengineered buildings”
A review of the analysis and design of PEB structures is provided in the current work. The study
gives a step-by-step description of how to model PEB structures and examines the various
elements of the PEB system. This review article concludes research on PEB's various aspects,
including characteristics, configuration, and performance in comparison to conventional steel
buildings. The design guidelines of different international codes of practice are also compared in
the study.
Akshay Sharma in their “Comparative Study of Conventional Steel Building and Pre-
engineered Building to be used as an Industrial Shed” This case study for Industrial Shed is
based on a summary and a number of other case studies that demonstrate the YMER || ISSN :
0044-0477 VOLUME 22 : ISSUE 04 (April) - 2023 http://ymerdigital.com Page No:752
experimental and analytical research they have done in this area. The outcome demonstrates how
these buildings are cost-effective, energy-efficient, and flexible in their design. The findings
indicate that compared to other types of industrial structures, steel structures are significantly
more cost-effective, energy-efficient, and flexible in their construction.
Nauman Khurram in their “Optimization of flange and web slenderness for preengineered
built-up steel sections” The impact of unbraced length ratios on flange and web slenderness
ratios is elaborated in this paper, which also presents a design-based optimization for pre-
engineered steel frames made up of built-up sections. A Mat lab-based tool was created to
address the issue of built-up non-compact and slender sections based on the planning process.
Different unbraced length ratios' section capacities were assessed. The parameters of interest for
the entire research were the local slenderness of the web and the flange.
Swati Wakchaure in their “Design and Comparative Study of Pre-Engineered Building” This
research analyses and designs a PEB Frame and CSB Frame industrial structure in accordance
with Indian standards (IS 800-1984 and IS 800-2007). In terms of weight comparisons between
Indian codes (IS800-1984, IS800-2007), as well as between PEB and CSB building structures,
the economy of the structure is addressed. The portion is categorized as Plastic, Compact and
Semi-Compact, Slender Cross portion in IS Code 800-2007 Table 2. The narrow portion is not
designed in accordance with IS 800- 2007.Therefore, in PEB design, the slender sections are not
designed in accordance with IS 800-2007 code and IS 800-1984 code, which reduces the weight
of the framework. When compared to IS 800-2007, the deflection limits in IS 800-1984 are
greater. PEB structures reduce dead loads, which in turn decrease foundation size.
CHAPTER - 3
OBJECTIVE OF STUDY
CHAPTER- 4
METHODOLOGY ADOPTED
1. Planning
2. Design
1. PLANNING
The plan according to requirement and considering architectural aspects was prepared.
The process of designing and organizing the layout, structure, and use of a building or other
physical structure.
It involves determining the best use of space, considering factors such as functionality,
aesthetics, safety, and compliance with building codes and regulations. The plan for the proposed
industrial warehouse is given in Fig. below.
2. DESIGN
a) Purlin and Grit Design
b) Portal Frame Design
c) Column Base Design
Purlins and girts are structural members in roofs and walls that support loads from
sheathing and cladding and are themselves supported by rafters, trusses, or building walls.
Purlins and girts can be made from timber or steel.
Portal frames are the most commonly used structural forms for single-storey industrial
structures. They are constructed mainly using hot-rolled sections, supporting the roofing and side
cladding via cold-formed purlins and sheeting rails. They may also be composed of tapered
stanchions and rafters fabricated from plate elements. Portal frames of lattice members made of
angles or tubes are also common, especially in the case of longer spans.
The steps in the plastic design of portals, according to SP: 6(6) – 1972, are given below:
4. Analyses the frame for each loading condition and calculate the maximum required plastic
moment capacity,
6. Check the design for other secondary modes of failure (IS: 800-1984).
The 'simple plastic theory' neglects the effects of axial force, shear and buckling on the
member strength. So checks must be carried out for the following factors.
1. Reductions in the plastic moment due to the effect of axial force and shear force.
2. Instability due to local buckling, lateral buckling and column buckling.
3. Brittle fracture.
4. Deflection at service loads.
All loads which are carried by columns have ultimately to be transmitted to the I earth. For
proper transmission of loads the safe bearing capacity of the soil has to be determined. Usually,
the allowable bearing capacity of the foundation soil as I determined by proper soil tests will be
provided to the designer. The region where the (smaller) column section gradually gets expanded
so as to be adaptable for the larger foundation structures is known as the column base.
a) Slab Base.
b) Gussetted Base.
c) Pocket Bases.
d) Grillage Foundations.
STEP 6: Find out weld size. (Welding required only when column is not machined)
DESIGN PARAMETERS
In this project the proposed structure and dimensions were fixed according to IS code.
Steel portal frames are one of the structures. Systems commonly used in industria1 buildings.
The analysis and design results are given for purlins, girts and frame members for the following
parameters:
in m in m 1 2 3 4
*Combination is available
TERMINOLOGY
1. Bay
The space between successive bends is called a bay. Bracing - Single or double diagonal
members which form truss system with columns or beams (trusses) to provide stability and resist
horizontal load.
2. Columns
These are members, generally vertical, which primarily resist axial load. They are more
often subjected to thrust and moment. Usually rolled single sections are used but laced and
battened columns are also used where two or more rolled sections are connected together by
lacing or batten plates.
3. Column Height
It is the height of column from the top of column pedestal (or bottom of column base plate)
to the eaves level of the pitched portal.
4. Crane Girders
These resist vertical and horizontal loads from cranes. They usually consist of an l-beam with
a channel (flanges down) welded to the top flange. A crane girder is a preformed metal beam on
which the crab or hoist head of a traveling overhead crane runs. Such girders are typically “I”
profile beams that may be reinforced at various points depending on the loads and crane
configuration involved.
5. Girts
Beam members carrying side sheeting and supported by columns. Girts are structural
members in roofs and walls that support loads from sheathing and cladding and are themselves
supported by rafters, trusses, or building walls.
6. Purlins
Beam members carrying roof sheeting and supported by trusses or beams. Purlin is a
structural secondary member which forms the skeleton of the Metal Building. Purlins are the
longitudinal horizontal members connecting the rafters along the length of the building.
7. Roof Slope
It is the slope of the roofing sheet with respect to the span length. It is obtained by dividing
the height of portal frame by half the span. A common roof slope is 4:12, Which means that for
every 12 inches of horizontal distance, the roof rises 4 inches.
The center line distance of two portal frames in the longitudinal direction. A span between
15 and 50 m. A clear height (from top of the floor to the underside of the hunch) between 8
and 18 m. A roof pitch between 5 degree and 10-degree (6 degree is commonly used) A frame
spacing between 6 and 8m.
9. Span
Gable is the generally triangular portion of a wall between the edges of intersecting roof
pitches.
1. Various industries require warehouse to store their goods such as packing warehouses,
Railway warehouses, Canal warehouses, Cool warehouses, and cold storage.
2. The calculations and design are executed considering economy and safety factors. The
factors and steps highlighted while execution of project is important to design any other
industrial shed.
3. Efficient designing and analysis for any similar industrial shed which is to be constructed.
1. IS 800-2000
General construction in steel - code of practice
a) Limit state design
b) Design of compression member
c) Design of tension member
d) Design of members subjected to bending
e) Design of members subjected to combined forces
2. IS 808-1989
Dimensions for hot rolled steel beam,column, channel and angle sections .
Nominal dimensions and mass of beam, column, channel, and equal and unequal angles
shall conform to the values given in Sections 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, respectively of the standard.
Dimensional and mass tolerances of the various sections shall conform to the appropriate
values stipulated in IS 1852 : 1985
Beams
Channels
Angles
This standard deals with dead loads to be assumed in the design of buildings and same is
given in the-form of unit weight of materials. The unit weight of other materials that are likely to
be stored in a building are also included for the purpose of load calculations due to stored
materials.
This 'standard incorporates IS: 1911 published in 1967. The unit weight of materials
incorporated in this standard are based on information available through published Indian
standards and various other publications the load is taken as = 1.2 KN/m2
Imposed Load The load assumed to be produced by the intended use or occupancy of a
building, including the weight of movable partitions, distributed, concentrated loads, load due to
impact and vibration, and dust load but excluding wind, seismic, snow and other loads due to
temperature changes, creep, shrinkage, differential settlement, etc.
These shall include any building or a part of a building or structure in which products or
materials of various kinds and properties are fabricated, assembled, or processed like assembly
plants, power plants, refineries, gas p!ants, mills, dairies, factories, workshops, etc.
In the design of dwelling units planned and executed in accordance with IS : 8888-1979, an
imposed load of 1.5 KN/m2 is allowed.
DETAILS OF WAREHOUSE
SL NO PARTICULARS DESCRIPTION
4 Eave hight 6m
6 Spane width 30 m
REFERENCE
2. Vaibhav B. Chavan, Vikas N. Nimbalkar and Abhishek P. Jaiswal, Vol. 3, Issue 2, February
2014 “ Economic Evaluation of Open and Hollow Structural Sections in Industrial Trusses”,
Aci Structural Journal.
3. C.M. Meera, June 2013 “Pre- Engineered Building Design of an Industrial warehouse”.
International Journal of Engineering Sciences and Emerging Technologies.
4. Subhrakant Mohakul, Dr. Shaikh Yajdani, Abhay Dhurde,August 2014 “Design of industrial
storage shed, and analysis of stresses produced on failure of a joint”. International Journal of
Civil Engineering and Technology.
5. Manan D.Maisuri, Hitesh K.Dhameliya, Hiten L.Kheni, Vol.1 Issue 12, December 2013,
“Review of Comparison Between Conventional Steel and Tubular Steel Section for Multi
Span Industrial Shed with Truss and Portal Frame” International Journal of Advance
Engineering and Research Development.
7. Yash Patel, Shreepalsinh Gohil, Dr .Tausif Kauswala ,Het Parmar, volume 3 issue 10,
april2006, “Analysis and Design of Conventional Industrial Roof Truss and Compare It with
Tubular Industrial Roof Truss” International Journal of Science Technology and
Engineering.