Asm2 1625
Asm2 1625
a) Strengths of performance
b) Limitations of performance
c) Any improvements needed in future assessments
Feedback should be against the learning outcomes and assessment criteria to help students understand how these
inform the process of judging the overall grade.
Feedback should give full guidance to the students on how they have met the learning outcomes and
assessment criteria.
Resubmission Feedback:
*Please note resubmission feedback is focussed only on the resubmitted work
December 25 2023
* Please note that grade decisions are provisional. They are only confirmed once internal and
external moderation has taken place and grades decisions have been agreed at the
assessment.
07.03-BM/FG/HDCV/FE 1/0
Contents
I. Research Analysis ...................................................................................................................................... 3
1. Analyse and evalute result ......................................................................................................................... 3
1.1 Survey ....................................................................................................................................................... 3
1.2 Interview ............................................................................................................................................. 11
2. Evaluate which tools ............................................................................................................................ 14
3. Evaluate accuracy interview and survey .............................................................................................. 15
II. Recommendations.................................................................................................................................... 16
1. Summary proposed system ................................................................................................................... 16
2. List of features for proposed system .................................................................................................... 17
3. Advantages and disadvantages of proposed system ............................................................................. 18
4. Proposed Management process ............................................................................................................ 19
III. Reflections .............................................................................................................................................. 20
1. Logbook................................................................................................................................................ 20
1.1 Initiation ............................................................................................................................................. 20
1.2 Planning .............................................................................................................................................. 20
1.3 Hardware setup ................................................................................................................................... 21
1.4 Software setup .................................................................................................................................... 21
1.5 Sensor development ........................................................................................................................... 21
1.6 Data Analytics .................................................................................................................................... 22
1.7 Integration .......................................................................................................................................... 22
1.8 Testing ................................................................................................................................................ 22
1.9 Training .............................................................................................................................................. 22
1.10 Deployment ...................................................................................................................................... 23
1.11 ........................................................................................................................................................... 23
2. Evaluation of the research result. ......................................................................................................... 23
IV. Evaluations ............................................................................................................................................. 24
1. Evaluate how successful of project according to plan: ........................................................................ 24
2. What things in plan have done. ............................................................................................................ 25
3. What are problems when implementing the plan ................................................................................. 26
07.03-BM/FG/HDCV/FE 1/0
I. Research Analysis
1. Analyse and evalute result
1.1 Survey
The responses were evenly split between "Extremely important" and "Very important" (33.33% each),
indicating a strong recognition of the importance of contextual analysis in understanding the specific
The majority of respondents (54.55%) believe that the most significant benefit of an energy management
system with integrated safety measures is "Sustainability". This suggests a strong recognition of the role
of safety measures in promoting sustainability in energy management. By integrating safety measures
into their energy management systems, organizations can not only reduce the risk of accidents and
injuries, but also promote more sustainable energy use. This could involve implementing safety protocols
and procedures, investing in safety equipment and technologies, and providing training to staff on safety
practices. By doing so, organizations can enhance the safety and sustainability of their energy
management practices, leading to improved operational performance and environmental outcomes.
The responses to this open-ended question provide valuable insights into the respondents' perspectives
on the development of an energy management system with integrated safety measures. Many
respondents emphasized the importance of incorporating real-time monitoring and regular safety drills
into the system. They believe that these features would enhance the effectiveness of the system and
improve safety outcomes. Additionally, respondents suggested providing user-friendly interfaces for
better accessibility. This indicates a recognition of the importance of usability in the design of energy
management systems. Based on these responses, it is recommended that organizations developing
energy management systems prioritize the integration of real-time monitoring and safety drills, and
ensure that their systems are user-friendly and accessible. By doing so, they can enhance the
effectiveness and usability of their systems, leading to improved safety outcomes and user satisfaction.
Furthermore, organizations should consider conducting further surveys or interviews to gain a deeper
understanding of the specific needs and preferences of their users. This can inform the development of
more tailored and effective energy management systems.
Google Forms are generally known for their user-friendly interface, making them accessible and easy to
use for both survey creators and respondents. The platform offers a range of features that simplify the
survey creation process, including various question types, customization options, and the ability to
analyze responses in real-time. The straightforward design allows users to navigate through the form
creation interface with ease, making it suitable for individuals with varying levels of technical proficiency.
One of the key advantages of using Google Forms is its integration with Google Drive, where surveys and
responses are automatically stored, organized, and easily accessible. This seamless integration
However, like any tool, there are considerations to keep in mind. While Google Forms are generally user-
friendly, complex surveys with intricate branching logic may pose challenges for novice users. Ensuring
that survey creators are familiar with the platform's capabilities is essential to maximize its potential.
Additionally, users should be cautious about the types of information collected through Google Forms to
comply with privacy and data protection regulations.
Another potential concern is the reliance on internet connectivity. Since Google Forms are cloud-based,
users need a stable internet connection to create and distribute surveys and for respondents to submit
their responses. In situations where internet access is limited, this could pose challenges.
Furthermore, ensuring the confidentiality and security of sensitive information collected through surveys
is crucial. While Google takes measures to secure data, users should be aware of the platform's privacy
settings and take appropriate precautions when dealing with confidential or sensitive data.
In conclusion, Google Forms offer a user-friendly and efficient platform for conducting surveys. However,
users should be mindful of potential challenges related to survey complexity, internet connectivity, and
data security to ensure a positive and effective survey experience.
In assessing the accuracy of both the interview and survey methodologies employed for this research,
several factors contribute to an overall evaluation. Firstly, the selection of participants was a crucial
aspect, aiming to include experts with diverse backgrounds and extensive experience in energy
management. The choice of three distinguished individuals, Dr. Allison Green, Professor Jason
Thompson, and Ms. Sarah Rodriguez, each with specialized expertise, ensured a well-rounded
understanding of the subject matter.
Regarding the honesty of responses, the structured nature of the survey and the in-depth nature of the
interview questions aimed to encourage transparency. However, it's acknowledged that responses may
be influenced by various factors, such as professional biases or the desire to present a positive image. To
mitigate this, future research could explore additional methods to validate responses, such as cross-
referencing with industry data or conducting follow-up interviews for clarification.
As for meeting expectations, the insights gathered from both the interview and survey align well with
the research's overarching goal of understanding challenges and opportunities in energy management
within environments lacking dedicated safety systems. The responses provided valuable perspectives on
integration, risks, and key considerations, contributing substantially to the research objectives.
To enhance the accuracy and effectiveness of future research endeavors, several improvements can be
considered. Firstly, diversifying the participant pool further could bring in additional perspectives,
Additionally, to ensure even more candid responses, anonymous surveys could be explored, allowing
participants to share their insights without concern for potential repercussions. Establishing a follow-up
mechanism for clarification or additional comments could also address any ambiguities or gaps in
responses.
Continuous refinement of the survey questions and interview approach based on feedback and emerging
trends in the field can contribute to the accuracy of future research. Regularly updating methodologies
to incorporate best practices and emerging technologies in data collection and analysis will ensure that
research efforts remain rigorous and aligned with the evolving landscape of energy management and
safety systems.
II. Recommendations
1. Summary proposed system
The proposed system for this project is a multifaceted energy management framework specifically
designed for operational environments currently lacking dedicated safety systems. Integrating cutting-
edge technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT) and Big Data analytics, this system aims to
optimize energy utilization while concurrently incorporating proactive safety measures. The project
unfolds through various critical phases, each contributing to the development and implementation of
this innovative system.
In the initiation phase, the project undergoes essential processes like project kickoff, objective definition,
stakeholder engagement, and risk assessment. These initial steps lay the groundwork for a
comprehensive project plan, resource identification, and allocation in the subsequent planning phase.
The engagement of stakeholders is crucial for ongoing support, while risk assessment ensures potential
challenges are identified and mitigated early in the project.
The hardware setup phase involves the procurement, installation, and testing of necessary sensors and
devices. Ensuring the proper functionality of these hardware components is vital for the success of the
overall system. Simultaneously, the software setup phase focuses on obtaining and configuring the
required software elements, with subsequent testing to verify their proper functioning.
The sensor deployment phase strategically plans the installation and calibration of sensors, emphasizing
testing and validation to guarantee accurate and reliable data transmission to the central system.
Following this, the data analytics phase involves the development and integration of a robust platform,
which is then thoroughly tested and optimized for efficient performance.
Integration planning is critical in the subsequent phase, ensuring the seamless blending of hardware and
software systems. This leads to integration testing to validate the functionality of the unified system. The
The training phase encompasses the identification of user and administrator training needs, the
development of corresponding materials, and the actual delivery of training sessions. This prepares
stakeholders for the imminent deployment phase, wherein careful planning precedes the execution of
the energy management system rollout across designated areas.
The final phase focuses on continuous monitoring of system performance and the implementation of
optimization strategies based on monitoring results. This iterative approach ensures that the system
remains responsive to changing conditions and continues to enhance both energy management and
safety within the operational environment.
In essence, the proposed system follows a systematic and phased approach, addressing hardware,
software, and integration considerations. This structured implementation aims to create a robust,
optimized, and safety-enhanced operational environment, fulfilling the project's overarching goal of
pioneering a comprehensive energy management solution for environments currently devoid of
dedicated safety systems.
• IoT Integration:
- Connects seamlessly with a variety of IoT-enabled sensors and devices.
- Allows for the collection of granular data, including temperature, humidity, and occupancy,
enhancing the depth of analysis.
- Facilitates a network of interconnected devices for a holistic understanding of the operational
environment.
• Predictive Analytics:
- Utilizes historical data to predict future trends and potential risks.
• Contextual Analysis:
- Considers the unique characteristics of each operational setting.
- Examines the specific challenges and opportunities within the context of the environment.
- Tailors the energy management strategy to address the distinct needs of different industries.
• Scalability:
- Allows for the integration of additional sensors and devices as the operational environment
expands.
- Accommodates growth in data volume and processing capabilities.
- Supports scalability to meet the evolving needs of the organization.
• Customization:
- Offers configurable settings to adapt the system to the specific requirements of different
industries.
- Allows users to define thresholds, alerts, and reporting parameters based on their unique needs.
- Provides a tailored experience to enhance relevance and effectiveness.
• Training Module:
- Develops a comprehensive training module for users and administrators.
- Includes interactive tutorials, documentation, and hands-on exercises.
- Ensures that stakeholders are well-versed in leveraging the system's functionalities.
Disadvantages: Despite its merits, the proposed system is not without challenges. One primary concern
is the initial implementation cost, which might be a hurdle for organizations with limited financial
resources. The reliance on a network of IoT devices and sensors raises issues related to maintenance,
compatibility, and potential technical glitches. Data security is paramount, considering the sensitive
nature of operational information, and organizations must invest in robust security measures to protect
Initiation Phase:
During the initiation phase, the project management team conducts a comprehensive project kickoff,
bringing together key stakeholders to define project objectives and establish alignment. This phase also
involves the development of a project charter that outlines the project's scope, objectives, and initial
stakeholder engagement strategies. Stakeholder identification and analysis are critical components,
setting the foundation for ongoing collaboration.
Planning Phase:
In the planning phase, the project management team focuses on developing a detailed project plan that
encompasses timelines, resource allocation, and budgeting. A risk assessment is conducted to identify
potential challenges and develop mitigation strategies. This phase also includes stakeholder engagement
strategies, ensuring ongoing communication and support. The project team creates a robust schedule for
task management, allocating resources efficiently, and developing a budget that aligns with project
requirements.
This proposed management process embraces adaptability, continuous improvement, and stakeholder
engagement, ensuring that the project team remains responsive to challenges and focused on achieving
project objectives.
III. Reflections
1. Logbook
1.1 Initiation
Time Tasks Result Evaluation Next
01/1/2023 – Project Kickoff Objectives Successful kickoff Project Planning
03/01/2023 defined, meeting
stakeholders
aligned
04/1/2023- Project Planning Comprehensive Timelines and Stakeholder
05/1/2023 project plan resources outlined Engagement
developed
06/1/2023 Stakeholder Stakeholders Ongoing support Risk Assessment
Engagement identified and secured
engaged
9/1/2023 Risk Assessment Potential risks Mitigation
evaluated and strategies in place
mitigated
1.2 Planning
Time Tasks Result Evaluation Next
Necessary
9/1/2023 – Resource resources Efficient allocation
Project Scheduling
11/1/2023 Allocation identified and of resources
allocated
Detailed schedule Realistic timelines
12/1/2023 Project Scheduling Budget Planning
for task established
Secondly, the honesty of responses is crucial for the reliability of the research findings. The use of both
closed-ended and open-ended questions in the survey and interviews aimed to encourage participants to
express their views openly. The responses obtained, especially in the open-ended questions, provided
rich qualitative data that complemented the quantitative data, enhancing the depth and authenticity of
the research findings.
Thirdly, the research results were evaluated against the initial expectations set forth by the project
objectives. The data collected through interviews and surveys successfully revealed specific challenges,
To improve for future research, a more extensive and targeted recruitment strategy could be employed
to ensure a more diverse representation of industries and roles. Additionally, refining the survey
questions for even greater specificity and tailoring the interview questions based on the unique expertise
of each participant could yield more nuanced insights.
In conclusion, the research results, derived from a carefully selected pool of participants, demonstrated
a high degree of alignment with the project's objectives. The combination of quantitative and qualitative
data provided a comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities in energy
management within environments lacking dedicated safety systems. The insights gained will serve as a
solid foundation for the next phases of the project, guiding the development and implementation of an
effective and tailored energy management system.
IV. Evaluations
1. Evaluate how successful of project according to plan:
The evaluation of the project's success involves a thorough analysis of its execution concerning the initial
plan and objectives. The project, aimed at developing an innovative energy management system for
operational environments lacking dedicated safety systems, has undergone various phases, from
initiation to deployment and monitoring.
Firstly, the project's success is measured against the initial plan, which outlined specific milestones and
deliverables. The project kickoff, project planning, stakeholder engagement, risk assessment, and
subsequent phases were executed according to the defined timelines and resource allocations. This
adherence to the project schedule ensured that each phase was completed systematically and
contributed to the overall success of the project.
Secondly, the engagement and collaboration with key stakeholders played a vital role in the project's
success. The involvement of experts in energy science, IoT specialists, and safety consultants brought
diverse perspectives, enriching the project with valuable insights. Stakeholder alignment, a critical aspect
of the project plan, was successfully achieved, ensuring ongoing support and commitment throughout
the project lifecycle.
Thirdly, the risk assessment conducted during the initiation phase proved beneficial in identifying and
mitigating potential challenges. Contingency plans were implemented where necessary, contributing to
the project's resilience in the face of unforeseen circumstances. This proactive approach to risk
Moreover, the deployment phase, where the energy management system was rolled out across
designated areas, was executed seamlessly. The careful planning of the rollout, coupled with effective
implementation strategies, ensured a smooth transition to the new system. User training sessions were
conducted as planned, contributing to user acceptance and the overall success of the deployment.
In terms of the monitoring phase, continuous performance monitoring and optimization implementation
were carried out systematically. The project team actively observed system performance, allowing for
real-time adjustments and improvements. The optimization strategies applied were aligned with the
monitoring results, showcasing the project's adaptability and responsiveness.
To improve for future projects, a detailed retrospective analysis could be conducted, gathering feedback
from team members and stakeholders. This feedback could provide valuable insights into areas of
improvement, allowing for continuous learning and refinement of project management practices.
In conclusion, the project can be deemed successful according to the plan, with milestones achieved,
stakeholder engagement secured, and a well-executed deployment and monitoring phase. The careful
planning, risk mitigation, and collaboration with experts contributed to the project's overall success,
setting the stage for enhanced energy management and safety standards in environments without
dedicated safety systems.
The project kickoff marked the initiation phase, where project objectives were defined, and stakeholder
alignment was established. This initial step set the foundation for a collaborative and well-supported
project environment. The comprehensive project planning that ensued involved the meticulous
development of timelines and resource allocations. This planning phase ensured that the project
progressed systematically, adhering to predefined schedules and resource requirements.
Stakeholder engagement was a critical component throughout the project's lifecycle. The identification
and involvement of key stakeholders, including energy scientists, IoT specialists, and safety consultants,
aligned with the project's interdisciplinary nature. Their expertise enriched the project with diverse
perspectives, contributing valuable insights and ensuring a holistic approach to energy management and
safety integration.
The deployment phase followed a carefully planned rollout strategy, ensuring a smooth transition to the
new energy management system across designated areas. User training sessions, an integral part of the
plan, were conducted as scheduled, fostering user acceptance and proficiency with the new system.
Continuous monitoring and optimization, as outlined in the plan, were diligently implemented during the
monitoring phase. The team actively observed system performance, allowing for real-time adjustments
based on monitoring results. Optimization strategies were applied, showcasing the adaptability and
responsiveness inherent in the project plan.
While the project execution largely adhered to the planned phases and activities, there were challenges
encountered during the implementation that required thoughtful consideration and adaptation. One
notable challenge was the dynamic nature of technological advancements, particularly in the fields of IoT
and data analytics. Keeping abreast of the latest developments posed a continuous challenge,
necessitating agile adjustments to the plan to incorporate emerging technologies that could enhance the
energy management system.
Another notable challenge arose during the deployment phase, specifically in the integration of
hardware and software components. Despite comprehensive planning, unforeseen compatibility issues
emerged during the actual implementation. This required the team to engage in on-the-fly
troubleshooting and adjustments to ensure a seamless integration process. While the risk assessment
had accounted for potential technical challenges, the real-world implementation unveiled nuances that
required agile problem-solving.
Stakeholder engagement, though planned meticulously, presented challenges related to varying levels of
familiarity with the proposed technologies. Bridging the gap between experts and end-users required
additional effort in crafting tailored communication strategies and adjusting training materials to suit
diverse skill levels. This highlighted the importance of not only engaging stakeholders but also ensuring
effective communication tailored to the specific audience.
In hindsight, the risk assessment phase could have been even more exhaustive. While major risks were
identified and addressed, a more granular examination of potential challenges related to specific
technologies or integration points could have further enhanced the project's resilience.
Despite these challenges, the project team's ability to adapt and address issues in real-time contributed
to the overall success of the implementation. Each challenge provided a valuable learning opportunity
and informed adjustments to the plan, ultimately enhancing the robustness of the energy management
system in environments without dedicated safety systems.