Chapter 1
Chapter 1
net/publication/332447091
CITATIONS READS
0 6,450
3 authors, including:
M. A. Abdou
Alexandria University
667 PUBLICATIONS 12,919 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by M. A. Abdou on 16 April 2019.
(d) For every ƒ there exists an inverse element denoted by f such that, f f 0 .
1
Definition 1.2 (Inner product)
A linear space X is said to be an inner product space if an inner product is defined on it. Such
an inner product assigns to every pair f and g in X a complex number denoted by f , g .
By definition, such an inner product has the following properties:
(1) f , g g , f . (2) f g , h f , h g , h .
So that, f g , f g f g
2 2 2
f f 0 . Using the properties of inner product, one
f , g f , g
2
=
2 2 2
f g f
f , g f , g g
2
=
2 2 2
f f 0.
f ,g
2 2 2
Hence, we obtain, f g . To complete the proof we note that if f and g are
linearly independent, f g 0. So that, we get a strict inequality. Equality will occur if
g f for a suitable .
2
Theorem 1.2: The norm f has the following three properties:
ii. f f . Iii. f g f g .
f , g f g
2 2 2 2 2
f 2 g f 2 f g g
f g
2
f g
2
Hence, we obtain , which yields, f g f g
One can also see that (iii) reduce to an equality only if f and g are linearly dependent.
Definition 1.3: Let H be an inner product space and f n a Cauchy sequence in H. Such a
sequence has the property that for every 0 , we can find an such that,
f n f m for n, m .
The inner product H is said to be a Hilbert space if every Cauchy sequence converges to an
element in H.
It is easy to see that, if such a Cauchy sequence converges, it must converge to a unique
element.
For this, suppose lim f nk g , lim f m k h .
n k m k
That is, we have two subsequences of f n such that, each converges to a different element.
Then, g h g f nk f nk f m k f m k h
g f nk f nk f m k f m k h
g f nk 1 , f nk f mk 2 , f mk h 3 .
So that, g h , 1 2 3
3
Since g and h are independent of nk and mk and is arbitrary, we see that necessarily
g h 0. So, we obtain g h .
b 2 2
The norm of L2 function x is defined by, x dx .
a
Definition 1.5 (Norm in L p ). The norm in L p space, is defined as
b
x
p 1
dx p
Definition 1.6 (Norm in l p space). Let p 1 be a fixed real number. We define each
, p 1, fixed
p
converges; then k
k 1
The norm in l p space is given by
p 1
p
k
k 1
If p 2 , we have the famous Hilbert sequence space l with the norm
2 2
k
k 1
Definition 1.7 (The C a, b space). The element of this space are all possible functions
l
defined on the interval a, b and having, on this interval, continuous derivatives up to the l
inclusive. The operation of addition and multiplication of functions by a number are defined in
the usual manner. We determine the norm of an element, a function, x C l a, b from
l
the formula max k x , 0 x being equal to x .
a x b
k 0
Definition 1.8 (Norm C a , b space). The space Ca , bcontains the continuous functions
with its derivatives . If x Ca , b then, we define the norm by the equation
b
max x or max x dx .
a x b a x b
a
4
Definition 1.9 (Norm in L2 C 0 , T ).The norm in the space L2 C 0 , T , where
t
2
t 0,T ,T 1 represent the time, is defined as x , t max 2 x , t dx dt
0 t T
0
x x dx x dx q x dx 1 1
1 1
p p q
1
a a a
p q
Definition 1.11. (Gamma and Beta function). We define the gamma and beta functions
1
respectively by ; x and x , y t x 1 1 t
y 1
0
e t t x 1 dt
0
dt .The first integral is valid
only for x 0 , and the second only for x 0 and y 0 , because it is for just these values of
r
r 1 r 1 , 0 1 (r a positive integer)
Then, we define the general hyper geometric function m Fn 1 , 2 ,, m ; 1 , 2 ,, n ; x by
1 r 2 r m r xr
Fn 1 , 2 , , m ; 1 , 2 , , n ; x
m
r 0 1 r 2 r n r r !
We shall confine ourselves to the two separate cases: m n 1 (in which case the function will
be called the confluer hyper geometric function or Kummer function) and m 2, n 1 (in which
case we shall merely call it the hyper geometric function).
d 2y
1 x
dy
The differential equation x 1 x 2
y 0 hyper geometric equation
dx dx
or Gauss's equation) has 2 F1 , ; ; x as solution. If is not an integer a second independent
1 x
Theorem 1.3: i. Pn x 2 F1 n, n 1,1; , ( Pn is a Legendre polynomial ) and
2
5
2 F1 , ; ; x 2 F1 , ; ; x
Definition 1.13. Bessel functions are solutions of the differential equation:
x2
d 2y
dx 2
x
dy
dx
x 2 n 2 y 0. where n is a (possibly complex) constant, and is known as
differential equation.
Solution of Bessel differential equation:
One solution of Bessel differential equations is given by ;
x2 x4 x6
y1 a0 x n 1 2 4 6
2 n 1 2 2!n 1n 2 2 3!n 1n 2n 3
1
Since a0 is at our disposal, we may take a0 . This will yield to the solution
2 n 1
n
x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 1 x 2
2 4 6 k n 2k
J n x 1
n 1 1! n 1 2! n 1 n 2 3! n 1 n 2 n 3 k 0 k ! n k 1
where J n x is called the Bessel function of the first kind of order n and argument x .
1 x 2
k n 2k
The second solution of Bessel differential equations is given by ; J n x .
k 0 k ! n k 1
For the values of n we consider, J n x and J n x are convergent for all values of x expect
x 0 . Since J n x contains negative powers of x while J n x does not, near the origin
J n x is unbounded while J n x remains finite. Hence , when 2n is not an integer, J n x and
J n x are two linearly independent solutions of Bessel deferential equation. Then a general
solution of Bessel differential equation when 2n is not an integer is ; y x c1J n x c 2J n x
Recurrence Relations for Bessel Functions: The Bessel function of the first kind J n x satisfies
the following relations:
d d
1. {x n J n x } x n J n 1 x , 2. {x n J n x } x n J n 1 x , 3.J n x J n 1 x xn J n x
dx dx
4. J n x J n 1 x xn J n x , 5.J n x 1
2
{J n 1 x J n 1 x }, 6. J n 1 x J n 1 x 2n
x
J n x
6
where n is non ــnegative integer, and called the Legendre differential equation. It is clear that the
only singularities are at x 1. In fact x 1 are regular singular points of the differential
equation.
The solution of Legendre equation is Pn x and call the Legendre polynomial of order n :
2
n
2n 2r ! n 2
n
for n even
Pn x 1 n 2r
r
x where n-1
r 0 2n r ! n - r ! n 2r ! 2 2 for n odd
3. 2n 1 Pn x Pn1 x Pn1 x ,
4. n 1 Pn x Pn1 x xPn1 x ,
5. 1 x 2 Pn x n [Pn 1 x xPn x ].
1 x y 1 x y n n 1 y 0 ,
2
2
Pn
,
x t n
1 t
n 0
1 2xt t 2 1 t 1 2xt t 2 1 2xt t 2
3. x 1 Pn x nP , x n P , 1 x ,
,
n n 1
1
4.Pn
,
x { n Pn1 x n Pn1 x }.
1, , 1
§ 1.2 Laplace Transformation: Let F t be any function, then the Laplace transform of
F t is denoted by L F t and defined by L F t e st F t dt f (s ), (s 0).
0
7
Transforms of derivatives: If F t is continuous for t 0 and of exponential order as t ,
and if F t is also continuous then L F t e st F t dt [e st F t 0 F t dt
e
st
s
0 0
L t F t f s ;
d
ds
n
L t n F t 1
n d
ds n
f s
Examples 1.1.
2
L sin 2t = ;
s 42
d 2 4s
L t sin 2t { 2 } 2 ;
ds s 4 s 4
d 1
L t e 2t
1
ds s 2 s 2 2
Theorem 1.5 ( Shift Theorem ) If f s e st F t dt Then, we have
0
f s a e
at
. e st F t dt e
st
[e at F t ] dt .
0 0
Inverse of Laplace:
s 1 k 1
L1 2 2
cos kt ; L1 1; L1 2 2
sin kt ; L1 e
k t
s k s s k s k
Solution L1 1
15 15
L
s 4s 13 s 2 9
2 2
15 1 3
Applying shift theorem: L1 2t
5e L 2 5e
2t
sin 3t
s 2 9 s 9
2
Example 1.3
1
s 1 s 3 2
3t 1 s 2 1 s 1 1 4
L1 2 L e L 2
3t
e {L 2 2 L s 2 16 }.
s 3 16
s 6s 25
2
s 16 s 16
s 1
L1 2 e
3t
cos 4t 1
sin 4t
s 6s 25
2
8
Theorem 1.6 (A convolution Theorem)
We now seek a formula for the inverse transform of a product of transforms.
If F t and G t are assumed to be functions of class A and if
f s e st F t dt ; g s e st G t dt , we have f s g s e
st
F t G t dt
0 0 0
1. Fredholm integral equations: The Fredholm integral equations are written in the form,
b
h x x f x k x , y y dy . (1.1)
a
The functions f and k are known and called the free term and the kernel of integral equation
(a)-For the Fredholm integral equation of the first kind, hx 0 , thus,
b
f x k x , y y dy 0 (1.2)
a
(b)- For the Fredholm integral equation of the second kind, assume
h x constant 0 , to have
b
x f x k x , y y dy . (1.3)
a
(c)-If hx 0 then, the formula (1.1) is called the Fredholm integral equation of the third kind.
(d)-The homogeneous Fredholm integral equation of the second kind is special case of (b), when
f x 0 ; i.e. we have
b
x k x , y y dy (1.4)
a
2. Volterra integral equations: Volterra integral equations of the first, second, third and
homogeneous kinds respectively are defined precisely as above except that b x is the
variable upper limit of integration namely,
9
x
f x k x , y y dy 0 , (first kind)
a
x
x f x k x , y y dy , (second kind)
a
x
h x x f x k x , y y dy , (third kind)
a
and
x
x k x , y y dy . (homogeneous formula) (1.5)
a
Nonlinear integral equations: The nonlinear integral equation of the first kind take the form
b
f x k x , y , y dy 0 (first kind )
a
b
x f x k x , y , y dy (sec ond kind )
a
b
h x x f x k x , y , y dy (third kind ). (1.6)
a
x
x f x k x , y , y dy
a
x
h x x f x k x , y , y dy (1.7)
a
integral equation of the first kind when h x 0 ,of the second kind when h x 0 , and of the
11
b
b
x x y
The Chandrasekhar- integral equation 1 dy f x
a
x y
such that the double integral, k x , y dx dy , has a finite value, then the integral equation is
a a
and differentiable function, then the integral equation is said to have a weak sigularity or,it may
H x , y
called the integral equation with Carleman kernel k x , y
, or logarithmic kernel
x y
k x , y H x , y ln x y
The integral equation will be regarded as being of singular type, when the kernel under
A x , y
consideration is of the form, k x , y , where the numerator, A x , y is a differentiable
x y
b b
A x , y
function of x and y . In this case, the integral k x
a
, y y dy
a
x y
y dy ; .
Appearing, in the integral equation, diverges in general. A kernel is said to have a strong
B x , y
singularity, if we write it in the form, k x , y where B x , y is a differentiable
x y
2
function of x and y .
A kernel is said to have a supper strong singularity, if we write it in the form,
C x , y
k x , y ( m 2), where C x , y is a differentiable function of x and y .
x y
m
11
(ii) Mixed integral equations:
The Fredholm-Volterra integral equation: The integral equations
b t
h x x , t k x , y y , t dy F t , x , d f x , t (1.8)
a 0
are called Fredholm-Volterra integral equations, where the Fredholm integral term is considered
with respect to position, while the Volterra integral term is measured with respect to time, ( see
Abdou [16] and [17] ) . The kinds of (1.73) depend on the value of h x .
The Volterra-Fredholm integral equation: The integral equations
t b
h x x , t k x , t F t , y , dy d f x , t (1.9)
0 a
are called the Volterra-Fredholm integral equations and its kinds depend on the value of hx ,(
see Abdou [20] and [19] ) .
The integral equation
t
x , y , t k x , y , , t d d F t , x , y , d f x , y , t (1.10)
0
is called Fredholm-Volterra integral equation of the second kind and its value depends on the
formula of the kernel of position and the domain of integration with respect to position, see Abdou
and Salama [20] and Abdou and Moustafa [21] .
§ 1.4 Fredholm theorems for continuous kernel
In this section, we will state the Fredholm theorem for continuous kernel without proof. The
proof can be found in Hochstadt [3], Tricomi [5] and Kanwal [7] .
Theorem 1.7: Let k x , y be a continuous kernel for all 0 x, y 1 .The integral equation,
b
x f x k x , y y dy
a
where, D x , y ; C n x , y n ! , C 0 x , y 1
n
n 0
b
n
C n 1 n 1 c n k x , y k x , z C n z , y dz , D c n n!
a n 0
12
b b
x1 x 2 xn
c 0 1, c n k x dx 1 dx n
a a 1 x2 xn
The equation hold for all sufficiently small ;that is for all 0 where 0 is a zero of
Theorem 1.9: Every zero of D is an eigenvalue of the integral operator K ,and in turn every
eigenvalue of K is a zero of D .
has q linearly independent solutions in term of which every other solution is expressible linearly
and homogeneously. Such a system of q independent solutions is given by,
x1 x i 1 , x , x i 1 , ,xq
D 0
y , ,y q
x 1 1, ,q
x1 , ,x q
D 0
y , ,y q
1
has in general, no continuous solution. In order that a continuous solution exist, it is necessary
that
b
f x
a
x dx 0, ( 1, , q ).
Where the x are complete set of fundamental functions for the associated homogeneous
equation
13
b
x 0 k y , x y dy
a
If these conditions are satisfied, then there are a q-fold infinitude of solutions of the equation
b
x f x 0 k x , y y dy
a
given by
b
x f x H x , y y dy c11 x c 22 x c q q x
a
where
x , x 1, , x q
D 0
y,y , ,y
H x , y 1 q
1
x , , x q
D 0
y , , y
1 q
where, f L2 0,1 and k x , y is continuous in x and y .Such an operator may or may not be
defined on the whole space H .
Example 1.4
Consider the space L2 0,1, and the kernel k x, y sin xy .If f x is an element (
function ) in the space then,
1
Kf sin xy f y dy
0
14
1
1 1
2
2
Kf Kf , Kf sin xy f y dy dx
1
2
0
0
Using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, to have
1 2
1 1 1
2 1
Kf sin 2 xy dy f y dy dx f y
2 2
dy f
0 0 0 0
For an arbitrary element f y in L2 0,1 , the formula (1.94) may not be defined. It will certainly
f y
2
1
In this case of (1.12) K is not defined on all of L2 0,1 but on a subset of L2 0,1 . This subset is
said to be the domain of K . For linear operators the domain will be a subspace of the Hilbert
space.
*Operators that do not satisfy (1.11) are said to be nonlinear. A general nonlinear integral operator
is of the form,
1
Kf k x , y , f y dy . (1.13)
0
1 1
Kf M f , . for all f in a Hilbert space H .The greatest lower bound of all M for which
Kf
Another way of defining K is K sup
f 0 f
Theorem 1.12 Consider L2 a, b where, the interval a, b may be infinite. If,
b b 2
a a a
15
1
b b
2
Kf k x , y f y
2 2
dy dy
a a
This leads us to
1
b b b
2
k x , y f y
2 2
Kf dx dy dy
a a a
1 1
b b 2 b 2
k x , y dx dy . f y
1
2 2
dy M 2
f M f
2
a a a
Hence, we have Kf M f .
For the continuity of integral operator, we assume two function f1 x , f 2 x such that,
b b
Kf 1 k x , y f 1 y dy , Kf 2 k x , y f 2 y dy
a a
Hence, we have
b
Kf 1 Kf 2 k x , y [f 1 y f 2 y ] dy
a
b b b
2
k x , y f1 y f 2 y
2 2
Kf 1 Kf 2 dx dy dy
a a a
1 1
b b 2 b 2
k x , y dx dy f 1 y - f 2 y
2 2
dy M f 1 f 2 .
a a a
§ 1.6 Compact operator: Let K be a bounded, linear operator on a Hilbert space H , and
all n , K will be said to be a compact operator if from the sequence Kf n , one can extract a
H is a Hilbert space.
16
m b
Kf n ai x bi y f n y dy .
i 1 a
Clearly, b y f y dy
a
i n bi y . f n M b i y
b
converges to some complex number say c1 .By the same argument we can now extract a
b
subsequence f n 2
of f n 1 such that b2 y f n y dy converges to, say
a
2
c2 .By extracting
Finally we note that the sequence Kf n m is a subsequence of Kf n , and is also a Cauchy
m
sequence, and lim
Kf n c i ai x .So that K is a compact operator.
m
m
n i 1
Theorem 1.14: Let K be a compact operator on the Hilbert space, H , and L a bounded
operator. Then both KL and LK are compact operators.
Proof:
Let f n be a uniformly bounded sequence in H . Since K is compact it contains a
subsequence f n such that Kf n is a Cauchy sequence. Since L is bounded, we see that,
LKf n KLf m L . Kf n Kf m .
Consider the operator KL . If f n is uniformly bounded, and L is bounded, then Lf n is again
uniformly bounded. Since K is compact there exists a subsequence such that KLf n is a Cauchy
17
Theorem 1.15: Let K and L be two compact operators on a Hilbert space H . Then K L is
again compact, and so is K for any scalar .
Proof: Let f n be a uniformly bounded sequence in H . It certainly contains a subsequence
f n such that Kf n is a Cauchy sequence. Now, if is any scalar then Kf n will again be a
such that both Kf n and Lf n are Cauchy sequence.In that case K L f n is a Cauchy
Theorem 1.16: Let K be a compact operator on a Hilbert space H , and let f n be a linearly
n 1
f n f n , g k g k
gn k 1
n 1
f n f n , g k g k
k 1
The sets f 1 , f 2 , , f n and g 1 , g 2 , , g n are subsets and also linearly independent of f n and
gn gm gn g n , g m g m , g n g m 2
2 2 2
18
If g n infinite we could select a subsequence g n such that Kg n is a Cauchy sequence .
Then, Kg n Kg m g n g m 2.
Proof: Let f n be any infinite, uniformly bounded sequence. We can select a subsequence f n 1
such that K 1f n 1 is a Cauchy sequence. From the sequence f n 1 we now extract a subsequence
f n
2
such that K 2 f n 2 is a Cauchy sequence. Proceeding in this fashion, we obtain a succession
of subsequences, f n f n f n
1 2
f n k ,such that K k f n i is a Cauchy
sequence for k 1, 2, , n .
To prove the operator K is compact, we must show that the sequence Kf is also a Cauchy n
n
Kf n n Kf m m Kf n
n
K k f n n K k f n n K k f m m K k f m m Kf m m
K K k f n K k f n
n m K k f m m K k K f m m
K Kk f n n K k f n n K k f m m K k K f m m
Kf n n Kf m m M M 2M 1 ; {k k , n ,m N }.
n m
19
that K 1 . Now, we take any uniformly bounded sequence f n such that, f n 1
Consider the set of functions g n x where g n Kf n . Now we shall show that there is a Cauchy
subsequence g n x that converges to a function in L2 0,1 . For this we select a dense countable
set of points on 0,1 . So, we shall denote these by rk . Now consider the set g n r1 . Hence,
we have, g n x K nf M f
n .MIn particular we have, g n r1 M .So that, the set
g r
n 1 has a point of accumulation in M , M . Then, we can select a subsequence g n r1 1
that converges to b1 .
Next, we consider the sequence g n x ,which at x r1 it converges to b1 . Now we examine
1
g n
1 r2 and select a subsequence g n
2 r2 that converges to b 2 . We repeat this process at all
rationales. Finally we consider the set of function g n x . This sequence converges at all
n
1
2
k x 1, y k x 2 , y
2
lim dy fn
n
0
1
1
2
k x 1, y k x 2 , y
2
dy
0
The above g x is well defined. To see this, suppose that x k is a second sequence of rational
Then,
g x g x g x g x k g x k g x k g x k g x
g x g x k g x k g x k g x k g x 3 , for k k
21
Which leads us to the result, g x g x .
Now it follows that g x is well defined as a continuous function for all 0 x 1 . Being
continuous on closed and bounded interval it is also uniformly continuous and this certainly
belongs to L2 0,1 . It follows that the operator K is indeed compact.
lim k x , y k n x , y dx dy 0
n
0 0
1 1 2 1 1
k x , y dx dy lim k n x , y
2
and defined, dx dy .
n
0 0 0 0
Now,
1
1 1
1
2
K K n f k x , y k n x , y f y dy k x , y k n x , y f y
2 2
dy dy
0 0
0
1
1 1
2
k x , y k n x , y
2
dx dy f
0 0
1
1 1
2
k x , y k n x , y
2
Then, K Kn dx dy .
0 0
References
[1] M. Bernkopf, The development of function space to with particular reference to their
origins in integral equation theory. Arch. Hist. Exact. Sci. Vol. 3 (1966) 1- 96.
[2] C.D. Green, Integral Equation Methods, New York, 1969.
[3] H. Hochstadt, Integral Equations, Awelye Inter Science Publication, New York, 1971.
[4] M. A. Golberg. ed. Solution Methods for Integral Equations, New York, 1979.
[5] F.G. Tricomi, Integral Equations, Dover, New York, 1985.
[6] T.A. Burton, Volterra Integral and Differential Equations, London, New York, 1983.
21
[7] R. P. Knawel, Linear Integral Equations Theory and Technique, Boston, 1996.
[8] P. Schiavone, C. Constanda and A. Mioduchowski, Integral Methods in Science and
Engineering, Birkhauser Boston, 2002.
[9] N.I. Muskhelishvili, Singular Integral Equations, Noordhoff, Groningen, The Netherland,
1953.
[10] Peter Linz, Analytic and Numerical Methods for Volterra Equations, SIAM, Philadelphia,
1985.
[11] K.E. Atkinson, A Survey of Numerical Method for the Solution of Fredholm Integral
Equation of the Second Kind, Philadelphia, 1976.
[12] K.E. Atkinson, The Numerical Solution of Integral Equation of the Second Kind, Cambridge
University, Cambridge, 1997.
[13] Christopher T.H. Baker, Treatment of Integral Equations by Numerical Methods , Academic
Press, 1982.
[14] L.M. Delves and J.L. Mohamed, Computational Methods for Integral Equations, New York,
London, 1985.
[15] M.A.Golberg.ed, Numerical Solution for Integral Equations, New York, 1990.
[16] M.A. Abdou, FredholmــVolterra integral equation of the first kind and contact problem, J.
Appl. Math. Compute. 125 (2002) 177ــ193.
[17] M.A. Abdou, FredholmــVolterra integral equation and generalized potential kernel, J. Appl.
Math. Compute. 131 (2002) 81ــ94.
[18] M.A. Abdou, On asymptotic methods for FredholmــVolterra integral equation of the second
kind in contact problem, J. Comp. Appl. Math. 154 (2003) 431ــ446.
[19] M.A. Abdou, FredholmــVolterra integral equation with singular kernel, J. Appl. Math.
Compute. 137 (2003) 231ــ243.
[20] M.A. Abdou, F.A. Salama, VolterraــFredholm integral equation of the first kind and spectral
relationships, Appl. Math. Compute. 153 (2004) 141ــ153.
[21] M.A. Abdou, O.L. Mustafa, FredholmــVolterra integral equation in contact problem, J.
Appl. Math. Compute. 138 (2003) 199ــ215.
[22] M.A. Abdou, A.A. Nasr, On the numerical treatment of the singular integral eqution of the
second kind, J. Appl. Math. Compute. 146 (2003) 373ــ380.
[23] M.A. Abdou, Fredholm integral equation with potential kernel and its structure resolvent,
Appl. Math. Compute . 107 (2000) 169 ـ180 .
22
[24] I.S. Gradshteyn and I.M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series and Products, Academic Press,
New York, 1980 .
[25] H. Bateman, A. Erdely, Higher Transcendental Functions, Vol.2, Nauka Moscow 1973 .
[26] S.M. Mkhitarian, M.A .Abdou, On different methods for solving the integral eqution of the
first kind with logarithmic kernel, Dokl. Acad. Hauk. Armenia 90 (1990) 1ــ10.
[27] E.V. Covalence, Some approximate methods of solving integral equations of mixed problem,
Appl. Math. Mech. 53 (1) (1989) 85 ـ92 .
23