Logic Assessment Final Term 7-9

Logic Assessment 7

It is a process of combining propositions in such a way that by there

combination, a new proposition may come about and we arrive at
conclusion.
1 point

Reasoning or Inference.
Immediate Inference
Mediate Inference
Oppositional Inference

__________ cannot be both true and cannot be both false.

1 point

Contraries
Contradictories
Subalterns
Sub-contraries

Exists between two universal propositions that differ in quality.

1 point

Contrary opposition
Contradictory opposition
Subaltern opposition
Sub-contrary opposition

Exists between two particular propositions that differ in quality.

1 point

Contrary opposition
Contradictory opposition
Subaltern opposition
Sub-contrary opposition

It is one in which we pass immediately or directly from a single

premise to a conclusion.
1 point

Reasoning or Inference.
Immediate Inference
Mediate Inference
Oppositional Inference
It is one in which we derive a conclusion from two or more premises
taken jointly.
1 point

Reasoning or Inference.
Immediate Inference
Mediate Inference
Oppositional Inference

__________ may be both false.

1 point

Contraries
Contradictories
Subalterns
Sub-contraries

It is meant the repugnance which exists between two propositions

having the same subject and predicate but differing in quality or in
quantity, or both quality and quantity.
1 point

Reasoning or Inference.
Immediate Inference
Mediate Inference
Logical opposition

Exists between two propositions that differ in both quality and

quantity
1 point

Contrary opposition
Contradictory opposition
Subaltern opposition
Sub-contrary opposition

__________ may be both true.

1 point

Contraries
Contradictories
Subalterns
Sub-contraries

The falsity of the particular determines the the falsity of the universal,
but the falsity of the universal dos not necessarily determine the
falsity of the particular.
1 point

Contraries
Contradictories
Subalterns
Sub-contraries

Exists between two propositions that differ in quantity

1 point

Contrary opposition
Contradictory opposition
Subaltern opposition
Sub-contrary opposition
--

If it i false that every book is divinely inspired; it is false that no books

are divinely inspired.
1 point

Contraries
Contradictories
Subalterns
Sub-contraries

If false that some A are B; it is true that some A are not B,

1 point

Contraries
Contradictories
Subalterns
Sub-contraries

If it is false that some monkeys evolved

1 point

Contraries
Contradictories
Subalterns
Sub-contraries

If it is false that certain creatures have no value; it is false that no

creature has a value.
1 point

Contraries
Contradictories
Subalterns
Sub-contraries

If false that some A are B; it is true that no A is B,

1 point

Contraries
Contradictories
Subalterns
Sub-contraries

If it is false that some cows are stars; it is true that no cow is a star.
1 point

Contraries
Contradictories
Subalterns
Sub-contraries

if it is false that everything taught in the books is correct; it is true

that some taught in the books are not correct.
1 point

Contraries
Contradictories
Subalterns
Sub-contraries

If it is true that many children become wiser than their parents; it is

true that many children do not become wiser than their parents.
1 point

Contraries
Contradictories
Subalterns
Sub-contraries

If false that some A are B; it is false that every A is B,

1 point

Contraries
Contradictories
Subalterns
Sub-contraries

If it true that every criminal should pay for his wrong acts; it is false
that no criminal should pay for his wrong acts.
1 point
Contraries
Contradictories
Subalterns
Sub-contraries

If it is false that no prisoner is innocent; it is false that every prisoner

is innocent.
1 point

Contraries
Contradictories
Subalterns
Sub-contraries

If it is true that some planets cannot sustain human life; it is false that
all planets can sustain human life.
1 point

Contraries
Contradictories
Subalterns
Sub-contraries

If it is true that no man can create a soul; it is false that some men can
create a soul.
1 point

Contraries
Contradictories
Subalterns
Sub-contraries

--If I is false, then E is _____.

1 point

True
False
Doubtful

Clear selection

If I is true, then A is _____.

1 point

True
False
Doubtful
 Clear selection

Since all voters are citizens is true, then some voters are citizens is
_____.
1 point

True
False
Doubtful

Clear selection

If E is false, then O is _____.

1 point

True
False
Doubtful

Clear selection

If all Xy is Wx is false, then no Xy is Wx is ___.

1 point

True
False
Doubtful

Clear selection

Since no accountant is a lawyer is false, then some accountants are

not lawyers is _____.
1 point

True
False
Doubtful

Clear selection

If A is false, then O is _____.

1 point

True
False
Doubtful
 Clear selection

If no man is an angels is true , then all men are angels is _____.

1 point

True
False
Doubtful

Clear selection

If E is true, then A is _____.

1 point

True
False
Doubtful

Clear selection

If O is false, then E is _____.

1 point

True
False
Doubtful

Clear selection

If every fish is aquatic is true, then no fish is aquatic is _____.

1 point

True
False
Doubtful

Clear selection

If A is true, then I is _____.

1 point

True
False
Doubtful

Clear selection

If some flowers are red is true, then no flower is red is _____

1 point

True
False
Doubtful

Clear selection

If some DY are not CNY is true, then some DY is CNY is _____.

1 point

True
False
Doubtful

Clear selection

If O is true, then I is _____.

1 point

True
False
Doubtful
Logic Assessment 8

A E I O proposition are obvertible and reversible.

1 point

True
False

A E I O proposition are obvertible and reversible.

1 point

True
False

A term is over extended when from particular it becomes universal.

1 point

True
False

Rules on complete inversion (select all correct answers, perfect or

zero (0) point.
3 points

Use the contradictory of the original predicate as the new subject.

Use the original subject as the new predicate.
As subject of the new proposition, use the contradictory of the original subject.
Change the quality or the copula.
Use the contradictory of the original predicate as the new predicate.

It is a type of eduction in creating a new proposition where the

contradictory of the original subject is now the new subject
1 point

Obversion
Conversion
Contraposition
Inversion

"I" proposition have no contraposits.

1 point

True
False

I and O proposition have no inversion.

1 point

True
False

Rules on conversion (select all correct answers, perfect or zero (0)

point.
3 points

Use the contradictory of the original predicate as the new subject.

.Interchange the subject and predicate.
Do not change the quality or the copula.
Do not extend any term.
Change the quality or the copula.

Rules on obversion (select all correct answers, perfect or zero (0)

point.
3 points

Use the contradictory of the original predicate as the new subject.

Do not change the quality or the copula.
Keep the original subject and quantity.
Change the quality or the copula.
Replace the original predicate with its co0ntradictory.

It is a type of eduction in which in creating a new proposition, the

subject and quantity of the proposition remain and the quality of the
proposition or copula is changed, then we contradict the predicate of
the given proposition.
1 point

Obversion
Conversion
Contraposition
Inversion

Rules on complete contraposition (select all correct answers, perfect

or zero (0) point.
3 points

Use the contradictory of the original predicate as the new subject.

Do not change the quality or the copula.
Use the contradictory of the original subject as the new predicate.
Change the quality or the copula.
Replace the original predicate with its co0ntradictory.

It is a type of eduction in which in creating a new proposition, we

interchange the subject and predicate from thee given proposition.
The quality of the proposition or the copula is retained and its term
cannot be extended.
1 point

Obversion
Conversion
Contraposition
Inversion

Rules on simple inversion (select all correct answers, perfect or zero

(0) point.
3 points

Use the contradictory of the original predicate as the new subject.

Use the original subject as the new predicate.
As subject of the new proposition, use the contradictory of the original subject.
Change the quality or the copula.
Retain the predicate of the original proposition

The "O" proposition cannot be converted.

1 point

True
False
It is a type of eduction which means that we use obversion and
conversion to get a new subject which is the contradictory of the
original predicate.
1 point

Obversion
Conversion
Contraposition
Inversion

Give the contraposit Type 1 statement: Every student is rational.

1 point

Every student is not non-rational.

No students is rational.
Every non-rational is not a student.
Some non-rational are students.

Give the converse statement: Every student is rational.

1 point

Every student is not non-rational.

No students is rational.
Some rational are students.
Some students are non-rational.

Give the obverse statement: Every student are rational.

1 point

Every student are not non-rational.

No students is rational.
Some rational are students.
Some students are non-rational.

Give the inverse statement(Complete inversion): Every student are

rational.
1 point

Some student are not non-rational.

No students is rational.
Some non-students are non-rational.
Some students are non-rational.

Every man is rational. - Some non-man is not rational

1 point

Conversion
Obversion
Contraposition
Inversion

No man is a dog. - Every man is non-dog.

1 point

Conversion
Obversion
Contraposition
Inversion

Every student is important. - Every student is not unimportant.

1 point

Conversion
Obversion
Contraposition
Inversion

Give the contraposit Type 2 statement: Every student is rational.

1 point

Every student is not non-rational.

No students is rational.
Every non-rational is not a student.
Every non-rational is a non-student.

No husband is a bachelor. - Some non-bachelors are not non-husband.

1 point

Conversion
Obversion
Contraposition
Inversion

Every dog is an animal. - Some animals are dogs.

1 point

Conversion
Obversion
Contraposition
Inversion

Some cats are white. - Some white are cats.

1 point

Conversion
Obversion
Contraposition
Inversion

No pig is a carabao. - Some non-pig is not a non-carabao.

1 point

Conversion
Obversion
Contraposition
Inversion

Every dog is an animal. - Every non-animal is not a dog.

1 point

Conversion
Obversion
Contraposition
Inversion

Some accountant are not lawyers. - Some non-lawyers are not non-
accountants.
1 point

Conversion
Obversion
Contraposition
Inversion

Every chocolate is sweet. - Every chocolate is not non-sweet.

1 point

Conversion
Obversion
Contraposition
Inversion
Assessment #9

It is an argumentation in which, from two known propositions that

contain a common idea, a third proposition, different from the two
propositions, follows with necessity.
1 point

Syllogism
Categorical Syllogism
Argumentation

The ____ is the predicate of the conclusion.

1 point
Middle Term
Minor Term
Major Term

It is a discourse which logically deduces one proposition from others.

1 point

Syllogism
Categorical Syllogism
Argumentation

It is the proposition containing the major term.

1 point

Major Premise
Minor Premise
Conclusion

The ____ is the subject of the conclusion.

1 point

Middle Term
Minor Term
Major Term

It is the proposition containing both the minor term and the major
term.
1 point

Major Premise
Minor Premise
Conclusion

Rules on Premises under the Formal Rules for Valid Categorical

Syllogism (select all correct answers, perfect or zero point)
4 points

No conclusion can be drawn from two negative premises.

The middle term must be distributed at least once universal in the premises.
The middle term must not appear in the conclusion.
No conclusion can be drawn from two particular premises.
The major term and the minor term must be particular in the conclusion if they are used as particular in
the premise.
There must be only three terms.
Only affirmative conclusion can be drawn from two affirmative premises.
If one premise is particular, the conclusion must also be particular; if one premise is negative, the
conclusion must also be negative.
Rules on Terms under the Formal Rules for Valid Categorical Syllogism
(select all correct answers, perfect or zero point)
4 points

No conclusion can be drawn from two negative premises.

The middle term must be distributed at least once universal in the premises.
The middle term must not appear in the conclusion.
No conclusion can be drawn from two particular premises.
The major term and the minor term must be particular in the conclusion if they are used as particular in
the premise.
There must be only three terms.
Only affirmative conclusion can be drawn from two affirmative premises.
If one premise is particular, the conclusion must also be particular; if one premise is negative, the
conclusion must also be negative.

It consists of three categorical propositions, the first two of which are

premises and the third of which is the conclusion.
1 point

Syllogism
Categorical Syllogism
Argumentation

It is the proposition containing the minor term.

1 point

Major Premise
Minor Premise
Conclusion

The ____ appears in both premises but never in the conclusion.

1 point

Middle Term
Minor Term
Major Term

No evil is good. But every good is desirable. Therefore, some

desirable are not evil.
1 point

Valid
There must be only three terms.
Illicit Major/Minor
Misuse Middle Term
Undistributed Middle
Only an affirmative conclusion can be drawn from two affirmative premises.
No conclusion can be drawn from two negative premises.
If one premise is particular, the conclusion must also be particular; if one premise is negative, the
conclusion must also be negative.
No conclusion can be drawn from two particular premises.

No goat is able to speak. But no cat is able to speak. Therefore, no

cat is a goat.
1 point

Valid
There must be only three terms.
Illicit Major/Minor
Misuse Middle Term
Undistributed Middle
Only an affirmative conclusion can be drawn from two affirmative premises.
No conclusion can be drawn from two negative premises.
If one premise is particular, the conclusion must also be particular; if one premise is negative, the
conclusion must also be negative.
No conclusion can be drawn from two particular premises.

Some writers are authors. But all writers are careful thinkers.
Therefore, some careful thinkers are authors.
1 point

Valid
There must be only three terms.
Illicit Major/Minor
Misuse Middle Term
Undistributed Middle
Only an affirmative conclusion can be drawn from two affirmative premises.
No conclusion can be drawn from two negative premises.
If one premise is particular, the conclusion must also be particular; if one premise is negative, the
conclusion must also be negative.
No conclusion can be drawn from two particular premises.

Every flower is beautiful. But every flower is a creature, Therefore,

some creatures are beautiful.
1 point

Valid
There must be only three terms.
Illicit Major/Minor
Misuse Middle Term
Undistributed Middle
Only an affirmative conclusion can be drawn from two affirmative premises.
No conclusion can be drawn from two negative premises.
If one premise is particular, the conclusion must also be particular; if one premise is negative, the
conclusion must also be negative.
No conclusion can be drawn from two particular premises.
Money is important. But education is important. Therefore,
education is money.
1 point

Valid
There must be only three terms.
Illicit Major/Minor
Misuse Middle Term
Undistributed Middle
Only an affirmative conclusion can be drawn from two affirmative premises.
No conclusion can be drawn from two negative premises.
If one premise is particular, the conclusion must also be particular; if one premise is negative, the
conclusion must also be negative.
No conclusion can be drawn from two particular premises.

All hammers are tools. But no chisels are hammers. Therefore, no

chisels are tools.
1 point

Valid
There must be only three terms.
Illicit Major/Minor
Misuse Middle Term
Undistributed Middle
Only an affirmative conclusion can be drawn from two affirmative premises.
No conclusion can be drawn from two negative premises.
If one premise is particular, the conclusion must also be particular; if one premise is negative, the
conclusion must also be negative.
No conclusion can be drawn from two particular premises.

Clear selection

Some free beings are men. But all men are animals. Therefore, some
animals are free beings.
1 point

Valid
There must be only three terms.
Illicit Major/Minor
Misuse Middle Term
Undistributed Middle
Only an affirmative conclusion can be drawn from two affirmative premises.
No conclusion can be drawn from two negative premises.
If one premise is particular, the conclusion must also be particular; if one premise is negative, the
conclusion must also be negative.
No conclusion can be drawn from two particular premises.
Every judge is a lawyer. But every lawyer is not a doctor. Therefore,
not every lawyer is a judge and doctor.
1 point

Valid
There must be only three terms.
Illicit Major/Minor
Misuse Middle Term
Undistributed Middle
Only an affirmative conclusion can be drawn from two affirmative premises.
No conclusion can be drawn from two negative premises.
If one premise is particular, the conclusion must also be particular; if one premise is negative, the
conclusion must also be negative.
No conclusion can be drawn from two particular premises.

Today is Monday. But today is fine. Therefore, today is a fine

Monday.
1 point

Valid
There must be only three terms.
Illicit Major/Minor
Misuse Middle Term
Undistributed Middle
Only an affirmative conclusion can be drawn from two affirmative premises.
No conclusion can be drawn from two negative premises.
If one premise is particular, the conclusion must also be particular; if one premise is negative, the
conclusion must also be negative.
No conclusion can be drawn from two particular premises.

All birds have wings. But all birds are animals. Therefore, all animals
have wings.
1 point

Valid
There must be only three terms.
Illicit Major/Minor
Misuse Middle Term
Undistributed Middle
Only an affirmative conclusion can be drawn from two affirmative premises.
No conclusion can be drawn from two negative premises.
If one premise is particular, the conclusion must also be particular; if one premise is negative, the
conclusion must also be negative.
No conclusion can be drawn from two particular premises.

Clear selection
Some teachers are licensed educator. But Mr. Paras is a teacher.
Therefore, Mr. Paras is a licensed educator.
1 point

Valid
There must be only three terms.
Illicit Major/Minor
Misuse Middle Term
Undistributed Middle
Only an affirmative conclusion can be drawn from two affirmative premises.
No conclusion can be drawn from two negative premises.
If one premise is particular, the conclusion must also be particular; if one premise is negative, the
conclusion must also be negative.
No conclusion can be drawn from two particular premises.

All voters are citizens. But some of my friends are voters. Therefore,
some of my friends are not citizens.
1 point

Valid
There must be only three terms.
Illicit Major/Minor
Misuse Middle Term
Undistributed Middle
Only an affirmative conclusion can be drawn from two affirmative premises.
No conclusion can be drawn from two negative premises.
If one premise is particular, the conclusion must also be particular; if one premise is negative, the
conclusion must also be negative.
No conclusion can be drawn from two particular premises.

All intelligent students are studious. But some Filipinos are intelligent
students. Therefore, all Filipinos are studious.
1 point

Valid
There must be only three terms.
Illicit Major/Minor
Misuse Middle Term
Undistributed Middle
Only an affirmative conclusion can be drawn from two affirmative premises.
No conclusion can be drawn from two negative premises.
If one premise is particular, the conclusion must also be particular; if one premise is negative, the
conclusion must also be negative.
No conclusion can be drawn from two particular premises.

Most students are diligent. But not all students are females.
Therefore, not all females are diligent.
1 point

Valid
There must be only three terms.
Illicit Major/Minor
Misuse Middle Term
Undistributed Middle
Only an affirmative conclusion can be drawn from two affirmative premises.
No conclusion can be drawn from two negative premises.
If one premise is particular, the conclusion must also be particular; if one premise is negative, the
conclusion must also be negative.
No conclusion can be drawn from two particular premises.

Some Filipinos are scientists. But every scientist is an intellectual.

Therefore, some intellectuals are not Filipinos.
1 point

Valid
There must be only three terms.
Illicit Major/Minor
Misuse Middle Term
Undistributed Middle
Only an affirmative conclusion can be drawn from two affirmative premises.
No conclusion can be drawn from two negative premises.
If one premise is particular, the conclusion must also be particular; if one premise is negative, the
conclusion must also be negative.
No conclusion can be drawn from two particular premises.

No fish can bark. But no dog is fish. Therefore, no dog can bark.
1 point

Valid
There must be only three terms.
Illicit Major/Minor
Misuse Middle Term
Undistributed Middle
Only an affirmative conclusion can be drawn from two affirmative premises.
No conclusion can be drawn from two negative premises.
If one premise is particular, the conclusion must also be particular; if one premise is negative, the
conclusion must also be negative.
No conclusion can be drawn from two particular premises.

Clear selection

Some men are businessmen. But each man is rational. Therefore,

some rational are businessmen.
1 point

Valid
There must be only three terms.
Illicit Major/Minor
Misuse Middle Term
Undistributed Middle
Only an affirmative conclusion can be drawn from two affirmative premises.
No conclusion can be drawn from two negative premises.
If one premise is particular, the conclusion must also be particular; if one premise is negative, the
conclusion must also be negative.
No conclusion can be drawn from two particular premises.

All educated persons are literate. But some Filipinos are literate.
Therefore, some Filipinos are educated.
1 point

Valid
There must be only three terms.
Illicit Major/Minor
Misuse Middle Term
Undistributed Middle
Only an affirmative conclusion can be drawn from two affirmative premises.
No conclusion can be drawn from two negative premises.
If one premise is particular, the conclusion must also be particular; if one premise is negative, the
conclusion must also be negative.
No conclusion can be drawn from two particular premises.

Clear selection

She wrote me a letter. But a letter is a character of alphabet.

Therefore, she wrote me a character of alphabet.
1 point

Valid
There must be only three terms.
Illicit Major/Minor
Misuse Middle Term
Undistributed Middle
Only an affirmative conclusion can be drawn from two affirmative premises.
No conclusion can be drawn from two negative premises.
If one premise is particular, the conclusion must also be particular; if one premise is negative, the
conclusion must also be negative.
No conclusion can be drawn from two particular premises.

Some buses are safe. But every bus is a public transport. Therefore,
some public transport are safe.
1 point

Valid
There must be only three terms.
Illicit Major/Minor
Misuse Middle Term
Undistributed Middle
Only an affirmative conclusion can be drawn from two affirmative premises.
No conclusion can be drawn from two negative premises.
If one premise is particular, the conclusion must also be particular; if one premise is negative, the
conclusion must also be negative.
No conclusion can be drawn from two particular premises.

No non-member is invited. But all invited are ladies. Therefore, some

ladies are not non-member.
1 point

Valid
There must be only three terms.
Illicit Major/Minor
Misuse Middle Term
Undistributed Middle
Only an affirmative conclusion can be drawn from two affirmative premises.
No conclusion can be drawn from two negative premises.
If one premise is particular, the conclusion must also be particular; if one premise is negative, the
conclusion must also be negative.
No conclusion can be drawn from two particular premises.

Love is blind. But God is love. Therefore, God is blind.

1 point

Valid
There must be only three terms.
Illicit Major/Minor
Misuse Middle Term
Undistributed Middle
Only an affirmative conclusion can be drawn from two affirmative premises.
No conclusion can be drawn from two negative premises.
If one premise is particular, the conclusion must also be particular; if one premise is negative, the
conclusion must also be negative.
No conclusion can be drawn from two particular premises.

Dog is three letter word. But some animals are dogs. Therefore,
some animals are three letter word.
1 point

Valid
There must be only three terms.
Illicit Major/Minor
Misuse Middle Term
Undistributed Middle
Only an affirmative conclusion can be drawn from two affirmative premises.
No conclusion can be drawn from two negative premises.
If one premise is particular, the conclusion must also be particular; if one premise is negative, the
conclusion must also be negative.
No conclusion can be drawn from two particular premises.