9781510419025-History Edexcel Weimar Nazi Germany
9781510419025-History Edexcel Weimar Nazi Germany
More people were able to vote in elections, such as all men and women over
the age of 20.
There were two people in charge of Germany: the president and the
chancellor. The president ensured that the chancellor worked fairly and the chancellor
could be appointed by the president and replaced. The president equally had a limited
capacity in power, as he was elected every 7 years.
3 Article 48 gave the president the power to suspend the constitution in an emergency and
make laws without the support of the Reichstag.
Earliest Latest
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 2
Statement True/False?
Men and women over the age of 18 could vote for False — the
Reichstag members. voting age was
20 for both men
and women
Presidential elections were held every 7 years. True
The president could use Article 48 to enact laws True
without the involvement of the Reichstag.
Reichstag elections were held every 6 years. False —
elections were
held every 4
years
The Reichsrat could propose laws. False — the
Reichsrat could
not propose
laws
7 For these exam-style questions we need to remember what the mark scheme is asking for
and how to access the top marks. Remember to balance your answer if you can: use the
stimulus points, plus one other point in your answer. The following is a suggested outline
(this planning technique can be applied to the exam-style answers throughout the
Workbook):
v Add a conclusion as to why Weimar either caused or did not cause problems for
democracy.
The Weimar Constitution caused problems for democracy the moment it was created in
1919. As soon as the Kaiser was forced to abdicate, a new government was hastily
introduced, which then brought about an end to the First World War. One of the features
within the Weimar Constitution was Article 48. This allowed the president to enact
emergency powers without having to consult with parliament. It gave him the ability to pass
laws quickly in order to deal with an emergency situation. This was a problem for
democracy because it meant that any president could pass any law, and if the Reichstag
wanted to vote against it the president could suspend parliament and call new elections. A
further problem for democracy was that this did not include a definition of the term
‘emergency’. In February 1933 it would allow Adolf Hitler to begin arresting opposition
groups when the Reichstag was burned down.
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 3
Another way that the Weimar Constitution caused problems for democracy was in the
creation of its electoral system. Proportional representation allowed all parties running for
seats in Germany to be fairly represented within the Reichstag. This meant that the more
extreme parties would also gain seats in the Reichstag during times of strength and
weakness for the country. Proportional representation should also have prevented one
party from dominating and winning outright. However, when the financial crisis created by
the Wall Street Crash hit Germany, votes for the more extreme parties, such as the
National Socialists, rose, giving the party access to power.
The Weimar Constitution could also be seen as not having caused problems for
democracy. In 1929, before the world’s economic crash, the constitution had seen off
threats from extreme left-wing and right-wing violence and also strengthened the position
of Germany within Europe. It had allowed moderate parties, such as the Social Democratic
Party, which was originally led by Philipp Scheidemann, to take the lead. It had also
created universal suffrage, which allowed all men and women an equal say in who should
run their country.
Ultimately, the German people would find that their constitution had let them down by
allowing radical movements like the National Socialists to use the very rules of the Weimar
Constitution to undermine its power in 1933.
I can infer that Germany lost the war and the French made the Germans accept the
Armistice terms.
We can tell that this is the case because ‘Germany’ is defenceless, in that he is being
made to keep his mouth wide open.
I can also infer that the French were the main cause of anger for Germany.
We can tell that this is the case because the French leader Ferdinand Foch is force-
feeding the terms as soup in the picture.
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 4
11 a
b In terms of the most extreme threat, the Kapp Putsch, the government retreated and
only a strike brought an end to the uprising. In terms of the least extreme threat, the
Munich Putsch, there was no real threat as there was limited support for the uprising. It
was therefore squashed with ease.
12 Gustav Stresemann became the new chancellor (for a brief period) in 1923 and negotiated
the loan of US money to help repay reparations. He introduced a new currency in order to
stabilise hyperinflation and return confidence in the economy. He also enabled Germany to
be seen as a country that could once again be trusted. Although he accepted the Treaty of
Versailles, Germany became a member of the League of Nations and was beginning to be
trusted again in foreign affairs.
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 5
13 a Spartacist revolt, 1919: the Weimar Republic was mildly successful. The government
had to use the Freikorps to tackle the violence and the president even fled Berlin during
the fighting. Freikorps were ex-army soldiers, more like a private military force.
b Occupation of the Ruhr, 1923: there was little success, as foreign troops had invaded
and it led to hyperinflation when the government chose to support the workers and
continue to pay them.
c Hyperinflation, 1923: the Weimar Republic tackled this well. New currency and loans
from the USA restored confidence and led to a new ‘golden age’ within Germany.
14
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 6
We can see in the picture that men are lying dead in the street and others are running
towards houses, which suggests they did not know what they were doing.
A civilian is wrestling with a man in the centre of the picture. It appears that there are no
other soldiers nearby and that the main fighting is happening in an urban area, suggesting
they want to take control of a city.
16 The Kapp Putsch was a right-wing coup involving the Freikorps and led by Wolfgang
Kapp. Its aim was to remove the Weimar government and establish itself as an
authoritarian leadership. It was a major threat to the Weimar Republic, as it was the only
revolt to temporarily overthrow the government. President Ebert had to flee Berlin,
undermining his position and emphasising the government’s weakness. The uprising was
only ended when Ebert called a general public strike. This shows either that the public
supported him or were so tired of revolution that they wanted some stability back in their
city. This uprising was therefore a significant threat, but it only lasted five days and was
defeated.
The Treaty of Versailles was somewhat of a threat to the Weimar Republic, in so far as it
tied the government’s hands. While it remained a part of the ending of the First World War,
the treaty forced reparations and war guilt on the German people, which would lead many
German citizens to hate it. However, under the leadership of Chancellor Stresemann the
Treaty of Versailles did not hold back prosperity and improvements to entertainment and
reconstruction. Therefore, although the treaty caused anger and would eventually lead to
support for the National Socialists post-1929, it was not as serious a threat to the Weimar
Republic as the Kapp Putsch, which showed how power could be seized by a small
military force.
The Dolchstoss theory (the belief that the Germany army did not lose the First World War
on the battlefield, but had been stabbed in the back by the leaders who signed the
Armistice) was prevalent among the veterans who made up the Freikorp, the main force of
the Kapp Putsch. However, it was not the only reason for the Kapp Putsch, and the fact
that the majority of citizens in Berlin agreed to strike in support of the Weimar government
suggests that the Dolchstoss theory was not so important to ordinary German citizens.
The Weimar Republic faced several threats, but it would be Wolfgang Kapp’s defeat of the
government that posed the greatest threat, as it temporarily removed President Ebert.
Stability was only restored through the actions of the public.
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 7
b Germany was undergoing a golden age, as the government had managed to secure a
better position within Europe through various treaties and negotiations. An extension of the
reparations bill enabled Germany to keep spending on amenities without defaulting on the
cost of reparations. The benefits of this were that cultural achievements were encouraged
and people started to move on from the First World War. However, underneath these
promising developments lay elements of discontent. Some German people did not like the
fact that their government had so readily accepted the terms of the Treaty of Versailles.
18
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 9
19
20
c Due to increases in state spending, by 1929 the state was now spending 33 times
more on housing than it had in 1913.
e By 1933 there were more female teachers because of the Weimar Republic.
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 10
21 For example:
22 By 1929 the Weimar Republic had removed censorship and allowed a great many
freedoms to develop. Women found a more equal role within politics and society. There
were more female deputies in the Reichstag and all women over the age of 20 could vote.
One of the most famous women of the time was Marlene Dietrich, who starred in several
major films, helping to make Germany the centre of a golden age in cinema — one that
could rival Hollywood. Other cultural developments included the creation of the Bauhaus
movement by Walter Gropius, which used basic geometric patterns to create furniture and
architecture for the future. The lingering psychological effects of the First World War were
seen in the artwork of the time. Artists like Otto Dix portrayed the horrors of a war which
had cost over 2 million German lives.
23 Source C is an excellent source to use for this enquiry, as it was written by a journalist who
was reporting in 1930, after the Wall Street Crash. The journalist praises the efforts made
since Versailles to make Germany strong. He or she suggests that although Germany has
had to shoulder a ‘terrific burden’, the country has succeeded much better than could have
been expected.
The problem with the source with regard to its usefulness is that it has been created for a
purpose, which is to support the government’s moves to accept the Treaty of Versailles.
We cannot see any alternative viewpoints from the time — perhaps this journalist is the
only one supporting the government in 1930? It is surprising, as it is likely that many
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 11
journalists would be attacking Versailles, especially since the Wall Street Crash had begun
to cripple Germany’s economy and votes for extremist parties were already beginning to
rise. The context makes the source much more useful, as we can see that even with these
problems the journalist still speaks highly of how much progress Germany had made
regarding Versailles.
Source D, on the other hand, is a much more useful source for examining the question of
recovery, as it was written in 1997 by a historian reviewing the history of Germany as a
whole. The fact that it was created in 1997 makes it a much more reliably researched
account, which would have drawn on several sources of information. The author
acknowledges factors such as the removal of US loans, the growth in unemployment and
difficulties in the farming industry. We know that by 1930 there was a rise in extremism,
too, which supports the points made here on the assessment of Weimar’s recovery. For
example, the Nazi Party had won 107 seats in the Reichstag in 1930 compared with just
12 in 1928. These events are not addressed by Source C.
One problem with Source D is that its purpose is to create an overview of the period. It
therefore does not mention Versailles, which was the greatest threat to government
democracy at the time. However, Source D is the more useful source overall, due to the
time at which it was written and the fact that it gives a more general assessment of
Weimar’s problems by 1930.
24 The Young Plan was created as a means of reducing the amount Germany had to pay
back over time. It helped to restore German people’s confidence in their economy and
Germany’s position within the international community, and it enabled the economy to
recover over time. The result would be that Germany would finish paying off its reparations
(set at 132 billion marks) in 1988. The plan was important because the USA had offered
Germany an olive branch. Not only did the Young Plan help Germany to pay reparations to
France and Belgium, but it also helped the country to continue to develop its own
economy. It enabled Germany to continue to fund its roads and building projects, as well
as postponing some of the payments if needed.
However, a disadvantage of the Young Plan was that it upheld the hated reparations
clause of the Treaty of Versailles. It also meant that, in theory, Germany would still be
making repayments 70 years after the end of the war.
The Locarno treaties of 1925 had also allowed the recovery of the German economy
because they created international trust in Germany. Foreign Minister Gustav Stresemann
signed the treaties, which guaranteed the western borders with Belgium and France
created at the end of the First World War. By setting the border, Germany was allowed into
the League of Nations, which was a huge step along the road to being welcomed back to
the international community. It helped the German economy by opening up the country to
better working prospects with its former enemies.
The Dawes Plan of 1924 was arguably the most important factor allowing the German
economy to recover by 1929. It was a negotiated set of loans from the US government,
which helped get money flowing back into Germany. The money was used to pay workers
and allowed the government to begin rebuilding towns and cities. However, the loans
would need to be repaid, and if the USA found it necessary to recall the loans early
Germany would potentially be back to square one. Therefore, although the Dawes Plan
helped the German economy to recover, it came with financial uncertainty, which would be
tested when the Wall Street Crash occurred in October 1929.
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 12
Earliest
Latest
Mein Kampf is The Bamberg The Nazis win 12 The Wall Street
published Conference seats in the Crash and the
Reichstag death of Gustav
Stresemann
2 a
The answer to 2a in blue is from the original imprint (2018) of this Workbook; the answer in red is from
the 2022 reprint, which does not include questions 2b and 2c.
vi All citizens have equal rights and duties
Most
appealin
g
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 13
feature
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 14
i These parts of the programme relate to giving people better opportunities for
employment and would appeal to lots of people who had lost work as a result of
the end of the war and later the hyperinflation problems of 1923.
ii Points i and ii are designed to specifically target the Treaty of Versailles, which
had made many Germans angry at their humiliation from the ending of the First
World War. One talks about unifying lost German land and colonies, while the
other directly mentions destroying the Treaty of Versailles. No other parties were
bold enough to attack the terms of the treaty so bluntly in their political
manifestos, which made the Nazi Programme stand out in 1920.
iii The third point shows how the Nazi Party were clearly trying to define what a
citizen was to create a so-called pure German society. It separates Jewish people
out, which shows that the Nazis had this in mind if they were to come to power.
iv By 1928, votes for the Nazi party were very small due to the fact that the Weimar
Republic had recovered from hyperinflation and there was no longer a need to be
concerned about employment, citizenship or destroying the terms of the Treaty of
Versailles.
b Most citizens in 1925 would not have been greatly concerned with citizenship or the
religious issues within Germany. They would more likely have been interested in equal
rights, now that they had finally got them. The Treaty of Versailles was a great cause of
anger and resentment, but as things were improving in Germany in 1925, the scrapping of
the treaty was perhaps no longer people’s top concern.
c Most appealing to least appealing: ii, v, viii, iii, vii, ix, i, vi, x, iv
Statement True/False?
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 15
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 16
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 17
7 Source E is a painting from 1933, the year that Hitler became chancellor, showing the
torch-lit parade of the SA down the main street of Berlin. It depicts the SA as strong-
looking, heroic men in uniform. There are flames in the background and the group holds
up the Nazi Party flag.
Source F is slightly more useful than Source E as it derives from an individual who was in
Berlin at the time of the Nazi agitations. The account appears to come from a diary, which
makes the source more useful as it reflects individual opinions that were probably not
intended for an audience. It reports the actions of the SA in 1930 during the opening of the
Reichstag. The author describes the SA as ‘riff-raff’ and implies they are not particularly
tough or brave, as they ‘made off yelling as soon as the police began to use truncheons.’
This source offers more information for an enquiry into the actions of the SA because it
seems not to have been produced for propaganda purposes, unlike Source E, and offers
an account of how the SA behaved in Berlin at that time.
8 a One of the main differences between these two interpretations is the way in which the
individuals are shown to both support and hamper Hitler during the Munich Putsch. In
Interpretation 1 Kahr is portrayed as betraying the group by ‘rallying forces against the
coup’, whereas in Interpretation 2 it claims that his ‘hands were dirty’, implying that he had
more to do with the coup in Munich and that Hitler didn’t act alone.
The language of Interpretation 1 makes it seem that the Putsch was unlikely to succeed
from the start (‘it was not even close to success’). Interpretation 2 does not support this
view, as it states that the forces had received ‘training and preparation’.
b One reason for this difference is down to the focus of the historians who wrote these
interpretations. The author of Interpretation 1 focuses on Hitler’s actions. Hitler is made to
look foolish, rather than an organised coup leader. For example, Overy remarks that he
‘limped away’ and that he ‘hesitated’. However, the author of Interpretation 2 provides a
more overall assessment of the involvement of other participants in the Putsch. Kershaw
describes how Kahr and Lossow were ‘implicated’ in the events. There is very little in the
way of reference to Hitler’s involvement.
c I disagree with the assessment made in Interpretation 2 about the importance of the
Munich Putsch, as the focus of the enquiry is more to do with the involvement of others in
the Putsch, rather than the part it would play in representing Hitler. Even though
Interpretation 1 makes Hitler seem more foolish and disorganised, these events seem
more realistic in terms of what we know happened during the Putsch attempt. We know
that things did not go to plan and that Hitler was at the front of the group when the local
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 18
military force opened fire on the Nazis. Equally, Interpretation 2 does not mention how
Hitler coerced the three leaders into supporting the Nazis by taking control of a meeting
held in the Beerhall.
The alternative view is that the three Bavarian leaders were more to blame for the Munich
Putsch, as they had agreed with Hitler, albeit at gunpoint, to support the Nazis’ aims.
Interpretation 1 makes the point that the Putsch was a fiasco and this is definitely
supported by the fact that both Lossow and Seisser were allowed to leave the Beerhall,
during which time they immediately changed their minds about supporting the Nazis and
instead organised the local troops and police. Interpretation 1 describes the police cordon,
hinting at precision in their timing and suggesting that the two Bavarian leaders were
successful in their attempts to organise the retaliation. I therefore think that this makes
Interpretation 1 a more accurate representation of events.
Overall, even though the two interpretations are looking at slightly different features of the
Putsch, the more persuasive viewpoint is the one that suggests that the Bavarian leaders
were not in full support of Hitler and that they did not have their ‘hands dirty’, but instead
that Hitler’s attempts to coerce them had failed.
10 People had lost faith in the government due to the economic problems caused by the Wall
Street Crash. The Weimar Republic was held together by the use of Article 48 and the
power of the president. Hitler’s Nazi Party was growing in strength within the Reichstag
and making it difficult for coalitions to form.
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 19
11
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 20
12
Event Chronological
order (1–10)
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 21
13 A central theme of Nazi ideology was the reversal of the Treaty of Versailles. This is seen
in the party’s efforts to blame the government and support the hard-working German
workers. Another propaganda message of the early posters was that Hitler was portrayed
as a saviour. He is seen holding the German flag or suggesting that ‘the sun will rise for
Germany’.
14
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 22
different to voters.
He ensured that there were mass Joseph Goebbels
rallies in five cities during the
1932 presidential election.
His speeches attracted many Adolf Hitler
people and helped increased
membership of the party.
He was elected to the Reichstag Joseph Goebbels
in 1928.
He presented a charismatic Adolf Hitler
philosophy that all could
understand, combined with a
vision of making Germany the
strongest nation in the world.
He was appointed Minister for Joseph Goebbels
Propaganda and Popular
Enlightenment in 1933.
b The interpretations differ because the two historians are writing with a different focus.
With regard to Interpretation 3 the writer is talking specifically about Hitler’s creation of a
‘myth’ to convince people to support him, whereas Interpretation 4 talks about the entire
history of the rise and fall of the Nazis and therefore has a different focus.
Interpretation 4 offers some degree of truth. Hitler did use tactics such as promises of
more work and making Germany strong again. He did provide Germans with work and
attacked the Treaty of Versailles. However, the interpretation also suggests that millions
flocked to him. To some degree this is true, as Hitler managed to gain power mainly
through electoral success. In the June 1932 election, the Nazis won 230 seats, which
showed a huge level of support for their cause. However, in November 1932 the number
had reduced to 196, showing that people were either tired of elections or that their support
was fickle and reliant upon kept promises.
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 23
The alternative view offered is that Hitler’s rise to power was based upon political deals
and opportunities that arose, which Hitler used to his advantage. Interpretation 3 suggests
that Hitler’s ability to take power was due to ‘conjunctural factors’. This is a more plausible
explanation, as his electoral success could only take him so far. He needed to gain the
position of chancellor through a political deal and through the manipulation of others, like
von Papen and Hindenburg. Alongside this, Hitler was able to use the Wall Street Crash
and the subsequent economic depression to his advantage by making both the Versailles
settlement and the Jews scapegoats for the crisis.
Overall, Interpretation 4 has very little accuracy, as it only claims that people supported
Hitler because of his promises, whereas his real advantage came from the events and his
manipulation of them.
17 Heinrich Brüning: had to rely on Hindenburg and Article 48, as the Centre Party lost seats
to extremists due to the Wall Street Crash.
Franz von Papen: could not secure a majority within the Reichstag and could not maintain
a coalition.
Kurt von Schleicher: undermined by the political deal between von Papen and Hitler and
because of landowners’ and industrialists’ fears that communist elements might gain
power under Schleicher.
18 The Nazis played on the German people’s resentment of the Treaty of Versailles for
crippling the economy, which boosted votes for them between 1930 and 1933.
The Wall Street Crash led people to distrust the government and support a party offering
them ‘the alternative’ in terms of giving them jobs, defeating the communists and making
the country strong.
20 For example:
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 24
21 For example:
22 The Nazis rose to power in January 1933 due to the role played by their own SA, the
leadership of Adolf Hitler and financial help from leading industrialists. First, the support
given by famous industrialists was reasonably important. Without their backing early on in
the rise of the National Socialists, Hitler would not have been able to create a party
programme or fund the building of a headquarters in Berlin. People like Fritz Thyssen were
interested in assisting parties that would allow capitalism to flourish. The Nazi Party was
opposed to communism, which led to Thyssen to back it. Thyssen would also encourage
other industrialists to support the Nazis in their rise to power.
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 25
Second, the role of the SA included the use of violence and intimidation against the
enemies of National Socialism and ensuring that the general public voted in favour of the
Nazi Party during elections. They played an important role in the Nazi Party’s rise to power
by January 1933. However, the SA was also seen as a liability and its members as thugs,
as it was formed from members of the old Freikorps. Hitler himself tried to quieten them
down and would eventually remove them as a threat during the Night of the Long Knives in
1934.
Finally, the Nazis were able to rise to power in January 1933 due to the leadership of Adolf
Hitler. He was able to present his party as the only one demanding the overturning of the
Treaty of Versailles and offering workers and the poor hope of employment during a time
of deep financial instability. Hitler was also able to manoeuvre himself into a powerful
position using his oratory to win support from other parties, like the political deal he
managed to secure from Franz von Papen. Overall, it would be Hitler’s leadership that
allowed him to capitalise on the funding he received and to reign in the power of the SA.
23 Source G, which shows a large crowd of poor, unhappy citizens with the message ‘Our
last hope: HITLER’, was created in 1932, at the time of the Nazis’ strongest electoral
results, as shown in Source H. Source G is moderately useful for an enquiry into Hitler’s
rise to power as it portrays the image that the Nazi Party wanted to present to the
electorate — that Hitler personally could restore prosperity to Germany and its people.
This would have a strong appeal to people whose economy had suffered first through war
reparations and then from the results of the Wall Street Crash. However, its usefulness as
a source is limited because it is one-sided, and we cannot tell from the image alone what
effect it had on how people voted.
Source H is more useful, as the statistics are not biased and simply show the election
results. They show that the Nazi Party won 230 seats and was the largest party within the
Reichstag. However, the source does not explain the reasons behind Hitler’s rise to power.
Also, if the November 1932 election results were set alongside, they would show a fall in
the number of Nazi Party seats and therefore give a diminished picture of Nazi success.
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 26
2 During and following the Night of the Long Knives the leaders of the SA, including Ernst
Röhm, were executed. The remainder of the SA was merged with the SS and the army.
This successfully removed the SA as a threat and secured the army’s support.
Statement True/False?
Enabling Act 4
5 The creation of the Enabling Act allowed Hitler to suspend the Weimar Constitution and
create laws as and when he saw fit. This enabled him to remove opposition, infiltrate the
police and begin rearming the country to take back land lost via Versailles, therefore
starting the Second World War.
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 28
7 a The difference between the interpretations is the level of blame attributed to van der
Lubbe in causing the Reichstag fire. Interpretation 5 claims that van der Lubbe was
responsible, since if he did indeed have links to the Nazi Party, they ‘would have shot him’,
thereby denying the police, courts and public the opportunity to question him.
Interpretation 6 claims that one man could not have caused the fire but that there were
‘several culprits’. This presents the basis for the argument that the Nazis were to blame for
the fire, and that the party could have used the fire as an excuse to arrest the communists
and enact Article 48.
b The two interpretations offer different views of the impact of the Reichstag Fire partly
because of the time at which they were written. Interpretation 5 was written in 1963, during
the Cold War. At this point a Communist government was in control of East Germany and
there were few accessible records for historians. In the west, communism was seen as the
enemy during this period. Perhaps the author has this in mind when he states that van der
Lubbe must have acted alone, as the Nazis allowed him to stand trial. Tobias is free to say
in 1963 that the Nazis ‘would have shot him’ if he had been associated with them.
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 29
However, Interpretation 6 claims that the police had already been tipped off that
‘Communists reportedly plan to carry out systematic raids’, which suggests that the Nazis
had told Diels to expect something big to occur. We know that the police arrived on the
scene very quickly, which also suggests that this was the case. The fact that Interpretation
6 was written 38 years later than Interpretation 5 and after the Cold War, suggests that
further evidence has come to light and that historians have been able to weigh up how the
fire was caused and who was to blame.
c Interpretation 6 is an accurate account. It was created in the 21st century with access
to plenty of historical records. The writer uses evidence from Rudolf Diels, who was there
at the time, to draw his conclusions. The view presented is that the scale of damage in the
building had to have been caused by multiple people, and not just van der Lubbe. The fire
also assisted the Nazi Party, in so far as it could use the event as an excuse to tighten
Hitler’s grip on power. The communists were arrested and other political parties banned. It
seems more plausible to suggest that the event was used to allow Hitler to exercise Article
48.
The other point of view is that van der Lubbe acted alone and that he genuinely aimed to
destroy the Reichstag in an act of desperation. Interpretation 5 highlights that by not
executing van der Lubbe straight away, the Nazis were able to prove their ‘innocence’.
However, the problem with this interpretation is that it is based on speculation that van der
Lubbe would have been executed if he had been working for the Nazis.
Overall, Interpretation 6 is very accurate — the time at which it was written plus access to
historical evidence suggests that it holds up against the historical events. It is more
realistic to conclude that several people started the fire and that van der Lubbe was the
scapegoat.
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 30
A resistance group of young people who listened to swing music and wrote anti-Nazi slogans
on walls
10 Some judges were removed and those that remained had to become members of the
National Socialist League for the Maintenance of Law (NRSM). In October 1933, lawyers
had to become members of the German Lawyers Front and by 1936 they had to wear
swastikas and the Nazi eagle on their robes. The Minister of the Interior would check
sentences and Hitler had the option to intervene if he felt the judgement had been too soft.
11
12
13
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 31
Statement
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 32
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 33
Tr Antisemitic signs were still present during the False — they were
ue 1936 Olympic Games in Berlin. not present
Germany won fewer medals than any other nation at the 1936 Olympic Games in Berlin.
False — Germany won more medals than any other nation at the 1936 Olympic Games
14 Source I is very useful for an enquiry into the consolidation of power, as it is a first-hand
account, written in 1933 by someone who witnessed the beating of a man at the hands of
the Gestapo. It is useful as a source, since it reveals an example of typical brutality, but its
reliability is shaky, as it offers only one example and in that example the man was spared.
It does give information about the types of people brought in for questioning and it
discusses the methods used, so this does help with an enquiry into the methods used to
consolidate Hitler’s power. The reality is that events like this did happen in Germany and
people were interrogated without access to legal protection, as the Nazis had infiltrated the
police force and the courts. We have little evidence of the intended audience for this
source, but it was probably a statement taken for a report. Therefore we must be careful in
our assessment of its reliability, as some elements of the account could have been altered
to make the witness seem more humane.
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 34
context, but it is not as useful as the written testimony from an individual who witnessed
actual police interrogations.
The Gestapo created a sense of fear among the population, in that if you resisted the
Nazis you would be found out and punished.
We know this because the source reveals how the mother bought a flag out of fear that
she might go to jail if she was caught without one.
We can also infer that the Gestapo relied upon the population to inform upon one another,
and to reinforce required behaviour.
We can tell this because the source states ‘people were always coming and saying “Why
haven’t you hung out a flag?”’. This shows that peer pressure was enough to make
someone adhere to expected behaviours in Germany at that time.
b The White Rose League was the most successful form of resistance, as the members
actively confronted the regime by handing out leaflets. Its primary leaders were executed
as a result. The Edelweiss Pirates were equally important as the group was a constant
irritant and continued to act underground after it was banned. It also survived the Nazi
regime. The Protestant Church was large and although some members, such as Martin
Niemöller, resisted and were sent to concentration camps as a result, others went
underground. The army generals and the Catholic Church both potentially had a great deal
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 35
of influence over what happened in Germany, but due to fear or lack of support they were
unable to achieve much in the way of opposition to the regime.
In conclusion, the White Rose League was the most successful, since its members
actively confronted the regime publicly and boldly, whereas the Catholic Church and army,
which potentially had far more power and influence, proved unable to confront the Nazis
so openly.
c The most successful resistance movement was the White Rose League because its
members publicly confronted the Nazis, whereas other movements and organisations,
including the potentially influential army and Catholic Church, were afraid to openly
challenge the regime.
18
Measures
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 36
19
Statement
Swing boys often grew their hair long and girls wore brightly coloured make-up.
Sophie Scholl was a member of the Red Rose Movement.False — army leaders set aside plans
to overthrow Hitler after the Führer successfully conquered Czechoslovakia
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 37
20 The most successful measure the Nazis employed in order to control the German
population was fear because it would be fear that enabled the Nazis to limit resistance to
the regime. Propaganda could sway young people’s opinions, but those who had grown up
under the democratic Weimar Republic may have been more open to questioning the Nazi
Party’s methods. However, the fear of being reported to the Gestapo was enough to keep
most people in line.
Newspapers controlled
Rallies
Source M is only mildly useful for this enquiry, since it is a photograph of the type of work
that was carried out in concentration camps. The problem with the source is that the camp
guards were the only people who had the ability to take photos of the camps. Therefore,
the photograph probably had the purpose of portraying camp life as less harsh than it
actually was. The workers appear to be wearing their own clothes and working on projects.
We know that this wasn’t the reality of camp life since prisoners had their heads shaved
and were made to wear prison uniforms. In essence, they had their identities and
individualities removed. This source is therefore not as useful in depicting an accurate
image of life within the camp system.
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 38
The fact that the source is a mere leaflet suggests that the opposition had little power. The
content of the leaflet also suggests that the opposition was only able to employ minor
methods of resistance, such as sabotaging meetings and festivals.
That the opposition was looking for support from the wider population.
The source states that ‘everyone has the right to…freedom’, and then asks ‘Why do you
not rise up?’, which suggests that the present regime has scared the population into
submission. The source also refers to ‘the smooth operation of the war machine’,
suggesting that the regime is easily able to create war and terror.
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 39
Women in the 1920sWomen under the Nazi regimea There were 100,000
women teachers and 3,000 female doctors.
d Women could wear short skirts and make-up, and cut their hair short.
f One-tenth of the members of the Reichstag were women.
i Women went out unescorted and drank and smoked in public.
k Those women who worked in the civil service earned the same wages as
men.b Women were encouraged to be healthy and wear their hair in a bun.
c Divorce was permitted if a husband or wife was unable to have children.
e The government issued young couples with loans to help them marry, so
long as the woman gave up her job.
g The number of women working increased from 11.6 million to 14.6 million
between 1933 and 1939 because of male conscription into the armed
services and the need for workers in industry as Germany sought to
increase its military strength.
h Medals were awarded on Hitler’s mother’s birthday to women with large
families.
j Women’s organisations were established to promote household tasks and motherhood
skills.
4 a The Hitler Youth was set up properly in 1933 (but originally in 1922).
c Activities included military training, listening to talks on Nazi political thinking, history
and fitness.
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 40
6 One method used to indoctrinate children was through propaganda in school resources
such as textbooks, which presented the Nazi regime in a positive light. The textbooks also
attacked the weakness of previous governments and blamed the Jews for the First World
War.
The Hitler Youth indoctrinated boys by teaching them how to fight, and by encouraging
them to honour dead comrades and celebrate war through ceremonies and the awarding
of blades and insignia. The girls’ organisation focused on traditional female tasks and
domestic skills, such as needlework and cooking.
Statement True/False?
8 a The two interpretations differ over the way the economic recovery of Germany
occurred. Interpretation 7 claims that Hitler was intent on putting Germany on a path
towards war from the start, as the historian claims that talks about building a dam in Upper
Silesia were to take a back seat and that all state-funded projects were to be considered in
terms of ‘the defence of Germany’. Interpretation 8 places more emphasis on the
accomplishments of state-funded schemes, such as the Autobahnen and ‘the nation’s
infrastructure’, in getting Germans working again.
b The interpretations are different because the historians hold such contrasting
perspectives on Hitler’s motives. The writer of Interpretation 7 states that Hitler’s primary
motive was warfare and the defence of a greater Germany. Hence he writes about the
implications that state-funded schemes would have for a war economy. The writer of
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 41
c I agree with Interpretation 8, as it refers to the creation of public works, such as the
Autobahnen and the building of the ‘nation’s infrastructure’, leading to economic recovery.
This does seem accurate, as Hitler was able to create full employment in Germany.
However, the problem with this viewpoint is that it fails to fully acknowledge how that
achievement was accomplished. For example, by 1938 women had been removed from
the workforce and Jewish shops and businesses transferred to German businessmen.
Rather than going into new jobs, workers were needed to fill the gaps that the exclusion of
women and Jews created. Figures from the time also suggest that the government’s
economic measures had succeeded, as unemployment had fallen from 6 million in
January 1933 to 302,000 by January 1939.
The alternative viewpoint is that it was not the creation of the Autobahnen or other public
works that rejuvenated the German economy, but the creation of a war economy. In
Interpretation 7 the historian states that Hitler said in a cabinet meeting that over the next 5
years any work should be ‘devoted to…the defence capacity of the German people.’ This
suggests that a military build-up was required to achieve economic growth. We can back
this up with the fact that conscription was introduced in 1935. Not only would this have
reduced unemployment, the party would also have achieved its aim of strengthening the
armed forces.
Overall, Interpretation 7 offers the more logical argument for the improvement of the
German economy, due to our understanding that Hitler’s main aim was to make Germany
stronger. For example, the building of motorways made it easier for the military to move
around the country, as well as creating construction jobs. Therefore, although there is
some truth to Interpretation 8, it is more reasonable to conclude that Hitler was gearing
Germany up for war, which in turn brought significant economic improvements.
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 42
10
11
12 Working conditions were improved and leisure schemes were implemented in order to
increase workers’ morale. However, women were removed from the workplace and
working hours increased, from 43 hours per week in 1933 to 47 hours per week in 1939.
Therefore, it was a false vision of what had been promised.
14
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 43
The first point to be made is that the Nazis promoted the Aryan stereotype in their
advertisements.
We can see that both individuals have blonde hair and are fair-skinned, supporting the
Nazis’ vision of the ideal German male and female.
The poster is advertising the KdF, the Strength through Joy movement which was
designed to improve workers’ lives. The car is the reward for hard work.
16 Not everybody was better off under the Nazis. During the Weimar Republic women were
given an equal status and allowed to seek positions within the government. However,
under the Nazi regime women were forced from their jobs into more traditional roles as
mothers and wives. It was this that increased employment opportunities for men, as they
filled these open positions. There was also systematic discrimination against Jews in the
workplace, particularly in the professions. For example, in 1933 legislation was introduced
to prevent Jews working in the Civil Service and to curtail ‘Jewish activity’ in the medical
and legal professions.
The Strength through Joy programme was intended to reward German workers for their
hard work. It was created for two purposes: first, to keep people busy, giving them less
time and opportunity for political resistance, and secondly, to encourage loyalty to the
regime in return for benefits such as subsidised holidays, theatre trips and a scheme that
allowed people to pay into a fund to buy a Volkswagen car. The German people had been
denied access to such luxuries for many years. However, the Volkswagen scheme proved
to be a false promise: people didn’t receive their cars, because the shift to wartime
production meant that military equipment was a higher priority than civilian vehicles.
The Beauty of Labour campaign worked alongside the Strength through Joy programme
and was designed to improve conditions for factory workers. It improved air quality,
changing rooms, cleanliness and noise levels. These practical steps were intended to
improve productivity in the factories and increase support for the state. This was probably
the most effective measure the Nazis took to improve working life for German people.
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 44
Kristallnacht 6
Jewish books were burnt 2
The Nuremberg Laws 3
The SA organised a boycott of Jewish shops and 1
businesses
There was a deliberate lull in the anti-Jewish 4
campaign due to the Olympic Games
Jews had a red letter ‘J’ added to their passports 5
b The Nazis took gradual steps against the Jews in order to test the public’s response.
The boycott was a small step on the road to isolating Jews from society, but it didn’t have
a far-reaching effect. When young people began voluntarily burning Jewish books in May
1933, the measures became more serious. The Nuremberg Laws effectively changed the
legal rights of Jews and meant that they were no longer protected by German law. German
friends then started to distance themselves. Jews were also forced out of their jobs and
banned from representing the country in the armed forces. Kristallnacht, in November
1938, was a concerted act of violent persecution of the Jews. Since very few people went
to the aid of the Jews that evening, the event allowed the Nazis to increasingly step up
their antisemitic measures until the start of the war in 1939.
18
Master race Nazi ideological belief which stated that the German
people were a superior race
Subhuman A lower order of human being — the Nazis used this
term as a label for those they considered
‘degenerates’
Euthanasia Killing by means of assisted suicide
Sterilisation A surgical procedure used to prevent somebody from
having children
Volksgemeinsc German phrase meaning people’s community
haft
Persecution The persistent ill treatment of a group of people
based on their race or religion, or political oppression
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 45
19
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 46
b Hitler and the Nazis created the idea of the ‘master race’, a pure, Aryan, German
state. It was to be achieved by eliminating those deemed racially inferior and through
selective breeding.
22
Action Year
b One difference between the interpretations is that the first historian is examining the
reasons for Hitler creating the anti-Jewish measures. For example, he mentions
‘calculated steps’. However, the second historian is more concerned with how the German
people responded to the measures. For example, he states that they were more
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 47
c I somewhat disagree with Interpretation 10 because even though people did not
appear to respond to antisemitic measures, such as the boycott on Jewish shops in April
1933, many people were too afraid to act. The boycott only lasted one day and some
German citizens still bought goods from Jewish establishments. This seems to prove that
the German citizens would not have immediately accepted full-scale exclusion of the Jews
from society.
You could agree with Interpretation 10 that many people were not overly concerned by the
state’s antisemitic measures. As they were relatively minor and implemented piece by
piece, for example boycotts, closure of businesses, banning Jewish doctors from treating
anyone other than Jewish patients, ordinary citizens did not notice the level of
discrimination taking place. Furthermore, exposure to antisemitic propaganda may have
encouraged them to believe that some of the measures were necessary to make Germany
strong again.
The alternative interpretation is a stronger view of the measures the Nazis took against the
Jews. Interpretation 9 states that Hitler did not want ‘to turn the Jews into a public burden’
and so each step had to be calculated. This therefore suggests that there was a plan to
remove the Jews from society and that it would have to be implemented carefully. We
know that Kristallnacht happened in November 1938 and as a consequence, over 7,000
Jewish businesses and synagogues were fined 1 billion Reichsmarks to pay for the
destruction. Hitler’s plan to remove the Jews from society eventually succeeded with the
creation of the concentration camps and establishment of the Nuremberg Laws.
Interpretation 10 fails to mention the impact of the Nuremberg Laws and downplays the
level of resistance to the antisemitic measures. However, it does provide us with the view
that the German people had perhaps believed the antisemitic propaganda presented to
them and that their more immediate concerns were over employment. Therefore, I largely
disagree with the accuracy of Interpretation 10.
Edexcel GCSE (9–1) History Workbook: Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918–39 48