Substantial Question of Law
Substantial Question of Law
Existence of "substantial question of law" is a sine qua non for exercise jurisdiction under Section 100
CPC.
A HC can entertain a second appeal provided that it is satisfied that the case involves a substantial
question of law. The term "involves" a substantial question of law. The term "involves" suggests that
such a question must arise in the case and it is necessary to decide it. The mere fact that question is
raised by the appellant in the appeal is not enough and the HC is not justified in entertaining the appeal.
The term "involves" implies a considerable element of necessity.
Limitation Period 90 Days from the date of decree appealed against Art 116 Limitation Act.
(1) Second Appeal should lie to HC from every decree passed in appeal by any subordinate court.
(Substantial question of Law)
(2)2nd Appeal should lie against appellate decree passed. Ex-parte.(Question -Law, Fact, Mixed question
Lawand Fact)
(4) Section 100 also states that if the HC is satisfied that the case involves a substantial question of Law.
Formulation of such a question.
(5) The 2nd Appeal shall be heard o such questions. Respondents may argue that the case does not
involve SQL.
Provisio- HC may after recording reasons hear the second appeal on any SQL (not formulated).
inserted by the Amendment Act of 1976 further substituted by Amendment Act 2002& 200.
Where any appeal from an appellate decree or order is heard and decided by a single judge of HC.
No further appeal shall lie against the judgement or decree of such single judge.
It is a declaratory Section. No second appeal shall lie except on the ground mentioned in Section 100.
Section 102- No second appeal in certain cases- (Money related) (Recovery of Money)
No 2nd Appeal shall lie in any suit valuation does not exceed 25000/-. (Amended by Amendment Act of
2002)
The issue of fact only be determined if there is sufficient evidence to dispose of appeal.
HC may determine the issue of fact if sufficient evidence and necessary for proper disposal of appeal.
Scope was wide due to which there was delay, confusion and problem.
- irregularity of court
- 54th Law Commision report HC have power if there is question of law of substantial in nature.
Chunilal V. Mehta & Sons Ltd v. Century Spg. &Mfg. Co Ltd, 1962
(b)(i) Any question of which directly and substantially affects the rights of the parties and not has been
decided by any court PC, FC,SC.
(ii) Any question which is not free from difficulties or allows alternative views. - CONFLICTING
(c) If the questions are well settled then it would not be SQL.
- Any question of Law which directly affects the judgement is SQL between the parties.
- Any Question of law which affects the final decision in the case is a SQL.
-A point of law which admits no 2 opinions may be a proposition law but SQL.
SQL- Question of law- Debatable not previously settled, material bearing on the (decision of the case).
Rule 2. Power of Court to direct that the appeal be heard on the question formulated by it.
ILLUSTRATIONS – SQL
2 people filed a suit against each other. One decree is favor one and other is on another the n only
balance will be completed.
Rule 19. Execution in case of cross claims under same decree.
Rule 21. Simultaneous execution- The court may in its discretion, refuse execution at the same time
against the person and property of the judgment holder.
Rule 32. Decree for specific performance for restitution of conjugal rights, or for an injunction.
Rule 64. Power to order property attached to be sold and proceeds to be paid to person entitled.
Rule 72. Decree-holder not to bid for or buy property without permission. Where decree-holder
purchases, amount of decree may be taken as payment.
Rule 105. Hearing of application. - Either party absent if applicant is absent then application dismissed. If
person whose against application was done that person is absent on the day of hearing it will be ex-
parte order.
Rule 106. Setting aside orders passed ex-parte etc.- within 30 days.
Section 36 to 74 of CPC deals with the substantive law in respect of execution of decree or order. And its
procedural law is provided in Order 21 of CPC.
When a person obtains a decree from a court of law against another person, his next step is to get the
decree satisfied. The proceeding by which he moves the court for satisfaction of decree is called
execution proceedings. Execution is the medium by which a decree holder constrains the judgmet-
debtor to do the command of the decree or order as the case may be.
Execution- It is the process of the court by which decree or orders are enforced.
The term execution is not defined in CPC. The term execution means implementing or enforcing or
giving effect to carry out the mandate of the decree or order and enable the decree- holder to recover
the thing granted to him by the judgment.
Section 36 provides that the provisions relating to the execution of decree can also be applicable in
execution of orders. And this section also states that the provisions relating to the execution of a decree
or order include payment under a decree or order as well.
APPLICATIONS FOR EXECUTION : Rule 10-23 of Order 21 deals with applications for execution.
3. If the decree is sent to any other court, the application can be made before that court or its
proper officer.
The application for execution can be made against the following persons:
Notice for Execution – Generally there is no provision that any notice should be given to the party
against whom the application for execution is made. But, the notice has to be given:-
1. After 2 years from the date of decree [Order 21, Rule 22 (1)]; or
2. Against the legal representative of the deceased (Judgement debtor); or
3. In relation to a decree passed by the court of the United Kingdom or any other
reciprocating territory; or
4. Where the decree pertains to the payment of money and the execution pertains to
personal proceedings against the Judgment debtor; or
5. Where the interest or decree holder has been transferred.
Execution of Decree
- No Statutory definition.
Delay in execution of decree- Rahul Shah vs. Jitendra Gandhi 2021 ASAP excution should take place
Part II of CPC
Section 48- Execution barred in certain case no repealed the Limitation Act, 1936
Decree holder, Legal Representative, Transferee of Decree- holder and 3rd party has no right.
Against whom
Form of Execution
Application of Execution- Form no. 6 (Appendix E)- 1st Schedule given in Rule 10
Rules 105 and 106 have been added by Amendment Act 1976
-Applicant not present (Dismiss), Opposite Party not present (EX-parte)
NOTICE required
Payment of money
Res Judicata is applicable to execution of decree dealt under Explanation 7 of Section 11.
- Of 1st instance
- When 1st instance court does not have jurisdiction or ceased to exit in this case any court passed
decree at the time of passing of decree and also had jurisdiction it will be court of passing
execution of decree.
Section 38 Courts which passed the decree, or by the Court to which it is sent for execution.
-on application pf decree-holder or suo moto on grounds on page number 653. CK Takwani.
Section 43- Execution of decrees passed by courts to which CPC does not apply.
Section 44- Execution of decrees by Revenue court to which CPC does not apply. (Buy SG notification in
official Gazette in allover State if passed by Courts in that State.)
Section 44A- Execution of decrees passed by courts passed by courts in Reciprocating Territory.
Court shall determine execution, discharge, satisfaction of decree. But cannot go beyond the decree.
Executing Court may Attach property, arrest of detein, transfer, orderr as to police help. As per section
42.
Executing Decree cannot rectify or modify the decree, Cannot question the validity of the decree, cannot
pass an order that decree is defensive, cannot decide whether decree is obtained by (a) fraud, (b) not
obtained by sufficient material facts.
Command of court, judicial direction or order of the court to attach the property of judgement order
asked by decree holder by formal application. Such command by court to another court this is precepts
validity of 2 months unless not increased.
Garnishee Order
The debtor of Judgement debtor is Garnishee. Garnishee order is the judicial order which directs
garnishee to give money to decree holder instead of Judgement debtor. This is discretionary power to
the Court.
Rule 46A- NOTICE to Garnishee is mandatory if not followed it is void. - Surinder Nath v. UOI, 1988 SC
Every transferee of a decree shall hold the same subject to the equities which the judgement debtor
might have enforced against the original decree-holder.
Section 51- Mode of Execution (pg no. 673) Power of Court to enforce execution
Movable property
51(e) Any other manner- Partition specific performance of court; restitution of conjugal rights
Money related matter of recoverable amount more than 5000/- then detention is not exceeding three
months.
Minor- ICA,1872 Section 10,11 only major person can enter into contract.
Acc. To Section 3 of the Indian Majority Act minor is who not attained age of 18 years.
Or, where next friend is appointed by court, courts of wards has superintendence of property; in this
case age of majority will be 21 years.
Law regards all acts done by either major or minor are on equal footing only then when there ia
appointment of guardian. The court will appoint a guardian.
Rule 2. where suit is instituted without next friend, plaint to be taken off the file.
Suit by minor institute by plaint in his name through the guardian and next friend, their appointment is
mandatory if not fulfilled then plaint will be cancelled.
Defendant should apply for the striking off of the plaint. And NOTICE to be given to the person who
presented the plaint in case of cancellation.
Court may at any stage of suit either on application of defendant or suo moto that plaintiff have to
furnish security for costs for defendants.
Appointed on application + affidavit: where in mentioned no adverse interest and he is fit for guardian.
Continue to Act in every proceeding against the minor whether appeal, revision, execution, etc. Unless
terminated by retirement, removal, death of guardian.
Rule 4. who may act as a next friend or be appointed guardian for the suit.
(1) Every application to the court on behalf of a minor, other than an application, under rule 10,
sub-rule (2), shall be made by his next friend or by his guardian for the suit.