Aerodynamics Lab Manual
Aerodynamics Lab Manual
AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING
SEMESTER IV
AE 19411
AERODYNAMICS LABORATORY I
REGULATION 2019
Laboratory Manual
VISION
To be an institution of excellence in Engineering, Technology and Management Education & Research.
To provide competent and ethical professionals with a concern for society
MISSION
To impart quality technical education imbibed with proficiency and humane values. To provide right
ambience and opportunities for the students to develop into creative, talented and globally competent
professionals. To promote research and development in technology and management for the benefit of the
society
VISION
To provide excellent graduate education in Aeronautical Engineering and continuously support the
community of aerospace professionals that will spearhead and strengthen the design and development of
Aerospace related industries and institutions in India.
MISSION
1. To impart quality exposure in theory and practical with proficiency, skill and humane values with
the best of teaching and industrial expertise.
2. To continuously strengthen the laboratory learning of students in tune with the best industry
processes and practices.
3. To ensure the updated knowledge and skill sets of students in emerging technologies.
4. To provide the students the right ambience and opportunities to develop into creative, talented
and globally competent aero professionals.
5. To promote research and development activities in the sphere of aeronautics for the benefit of the
society.
C. Program Educational Objectives (PEOs):
PEO#I
Our graduates have the ability to apply knowledge across the disciplines and in emerging areas of
Aerospace Engineering for higher studies, research, employability and product development.
PEO#II
Our graduates have the communication skills, sense of responsibility to protect the environment and
ethical conduct towards their profession and commitment to serve the society.
PEO#III
Our graduates possess academic excellence, managerial skills and leadership qualities and understand the
need for lifelong learning for a successful professional career.
0 4 0 2 50 50 50
Pre-requisite: Fluid Mechanics and Machinery (AE19341), Fundamentals of Aerospace Engineering(AE19301)
Course Objectives:
I. To visualize and understand the low speed flows
II. To practice techniques which predict/measure aerodynamics forces
III. To understand the interactions of flow fields
Course Outcomes:
On completion of the course students will be able to
AE19411.1 - make use of the aerodynamic testing equipment effectively for low speed aerodynamic experiments
AE19411.2 - classify the flows and distinguish flow features of streamlined and bluff bodies
AE19411.3 - examine the flow separation effects through pressure and force measurements
AE19411.4 - inspect flow fields through smoke and tuft flow visualizations
AE19411.5 - Infer the experimental results to suggest potential improvements in design of aerodynamic shapes
Detailed Syllabus:
Unit Description Duration
1 Calibration of subsonic wind tunnel
2 Smoke flow visualization at low speeds.
3 Tuft flow visualization on airfoil model at low speeds.
Surface pressure distribution on a symmetrical airfoil at an angle of incidence and calculation
4 of lift and pressure drag.
Total 45
Planed
Actual
S. No. Duration in Topic(s)
Period/Hrs
Period/Hrs
COURSE OBJECTIVES
To visualize and understand the low speed flows
To practice techniques which predict/measure aerodynamics forces
To understand the interactions of flow fields
List of Experiments
AE19411.1 make use of the aerodynamic testing equipment effectively for low speed aerodynamic
experiments
AE19411.2 classify the flows and distinguish flow features of streamlined and bluff bodies
AE19411.3 examine the flow separation effects through pressure and force measurements
AE19411.4 inspect flow fields through smoke and tuft flow visualizations
CO – PO MATRICES OF COURSES
CO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
AE19411.1 1 2 2 3 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 2 -
AE19411.2 1 2 2 3 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 3 2 -
AE19411.3 1 2 2 3 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 3 3 -
AE19411.4 1 1 3 3 1 - - 2 1 1 1 1 3 3 -
AE19411.5 1 1 3 2 2 - 1 2 1 1 1 1 3 3 1
Note:
1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High)
.
INDEX
S. No. Exp. No Date Title Marks Signature
Calibration of velocity profile in the test section
1 1 of a subsonic wind tunnel
Aerodynamicists use wind tunnels to test models of proposed aircraft. In the tunnel, the
engineer can carefully control the flow which affects forces on the aircraft. By making careful
measurements of the forces on the model, the engineer can predict the forces on the full-scale
aircraft. And by using special diagnostic techniques, the engineer can better understand and
improve the performance of the aircraft.
Wind tunnels are designed for a specific purpose and speed range. Therefore, there are
many different types of wind tunnels and several different ways to classify wind tunnels. In this
section we shall study various types of wind tunnels and discuss some of the unique features of
each type of tunnel. On the figure, we show several examples of wind tunnels and their
designation.
DESCRIPTION:
Let us consider the various ways that we classify wind tunnels.
Tunnel Geometry
Wind tunnels are also designated by the geometry of the tunnel. A wind tunnel that is
open on both ends and draws air from the room into the test section is called an open
return tunnel. The tunnel at the lower right of the figure is an open return tunnel. A wind tunnel
that is closed and re-circulates the air through the test section is called a closed return tunnel.
A blow down wind tunnel has a high pressure vessel upstream of the test section and a low
pressure reservoir downstream of the test section. Blow down tunnels are used for supersonic
testing. For hypersonic testing, a variation of the blow down tunnel called a shock tube is often
used. Test times in a blow down tunnel or shock tube are much less than in a continuous flow
tunnel.
Working Fluid
Wind tunnels can be designated by the type of fluid that is used in the tunnel. For most
low speed aircraft wind tunnel testing, air is moved through the tunnel. To visualize shock waves
for high speed aircraft, or to study the flow around submarines or boats, water is used as the
working fluid. A water tunnel is shown at the upper right of the first figure. In some hypersonic
facilities, nitrogen or helium has been used as the working fluid. Similarly, cryogenic nitrogen
has been used for high Reynold's number testing of transonic flows.
There are several wind tunnels around the world that are used to study ice build-up on
aircraft parts. These icing tunnels include refrigeration devices to cool the air in the tunnel and
water spray devices to provide liquid droplets in the test section.
Special Purpose
Wind tunnels are often designated by the special purpose for which they were designed
and built. Propulsion wind tunnels have special requirements for handling the high temperature
exhaust from turbine or rocket engines. Flow Visualization or "smoke" tunnels must also handle
the exhaust contaminants that are used in the tunnel. Wind tunnels that are used to study
the stability of aircraft must allow the model to move freely within the test section. Certain high
temperature facilities have been designed to more accurately simulate the high temperature
effects of hypersonic flows.
Figure shows a schematic drawing of an open return wind tunnel. This type of tunnel is
also called an Eiffel tunnel, after the French engineer, or an NPL tunnel, after the National
Physical Laboratory in England, where the tunnel was first used. The Eiffel tunnel has an open
test section, while the NPL tunnel has a closed test section as shown in the figure. The
original Wright Brother's wind tunnel was an open return design. In the open return tunnel, the
air that passes through the test section is gathered from the room in which the tunnel is located.
The arrows on the figure denote the flow of air through the wind tunnel and around the room.
The open return tunnel has some advantages and some disadvantages relative to the closed return
tunnel.
• Poor flow quality possible in the test section. Flow turning the corner into the bell mouth
may require extensive screens or flow straighteners. The tunnel should also be kept away
from objects in the room (walls, desks, people ...) that produce asymmetries to the bell
mouth. Tunnels open to the atmosphere are also affected by winds and weather.
• High operating costs. The fan must continually accelerate flow through the tunnel.
• Noisy operation. Loud noise from the fan may limit times of operation.
Closed Return Wind Tunnel
A closed return wind tunnel is also called a Prandtl tunnel, after the German engineer, or
a Gottingen tunnel, after the research laboratory in Germany where the tunnel was first used.
Many of the large research wind tunnels of NASA are closed return tunnels. In the closed return
tunnel, air is conducted from the exit of the test section back to the fan by a series of turning
vanes. Exiting the fan, the air is returned to the contraction section and back through the test
section. Air is continuously circulated through the duct work of the closed return tunnel. The
arrows on the figure denote the flow of air through the wind tunnel. In the other major tunnel
design, the open return tunnel, air that passes through the test section is gathered from the room
in which the tunnel is located.
Closed return tunnels may operate subsonically, as shown in the figure, or supersonically,
as described on a separate page. Supersonic closed return tunnels are more complex than
subsonic tunnels. To prevent condensation in the test section because of low pressure, the air
entering the tunnel is often passed over a dryer bed. There is usually an additional throat placed
in the tunnel downstream of the test section to shock down the supersonic flow to subsonic. The
major disadvantage is the increased size and operating costs.
• Superior flow quality in the test section. Flow turning vanes in the corner and flow
straighteners near the test section insure relatively uniform flow in the test section.
• Low operating costs. Once the air is circulating in the tunnel, the fan and motor only
needs to overcome losses along the wall and through the turning vanes. The fan does not
have to constantly accelerate the air.
• Inferior design for propulsion and smoke visualization. The tunnel must be designed to
purge exhaust products that accumulate in the tunnel.
• Hotter running conditions than an open return tunnel. Tunnel may have to employ heat
exchangers or active cooling.
Wind tunnels are designed for a specific purpose and speed range and there is a wide
variety of wind tunnel types and model instrumentation. The model to be tested in the wind
tunnel is placed in the test section of the tunnel. The speed in the test section is determined by the
design of the tunnel. The choice of speed range affects the design of the wind tunnel due
to compressibility effects.
For subsonic flows, the air density remains nearly constant and decreasing the cross-
sectional area causes the flow to increase. Similarly, increasing the area causes the velocity to
decrease and the pressure to increase. We want the highest possible velocity in the test section.
For a subsonic wind tunnel, the test section is placed at the end of the contraction section and
upstream of the diffuser. From knowledge of the conservation of mass for subsonic flows, we
can design the test section to produce a desired velocity or Mach number since the velocity is a
function. On the figure, we note the changes in Mach number, velocity and pressure through a
subsonic wind tunnel design. The plenum is the settling chamber on a closed return tunnel, or the
open room of an open return design.
For supersonic flows, the air density changes in the tunnel because of compressibility. In
fact, the density faster than the velocity by a factor of the square of the Mach number. In a
supersonic flow, decreasing the cross-sectional area causes the flow to decrease in velocity and
increase pressure. Similarly, increasing the area causes the velocity to increase and the pressure
to decrease. This change in properties is exactly the opposite of the change that occurs
subsonically. In addition, compressible flows experience mass flow choking. As a subsonic flow
is contracted, the velocity and Mach number increase. When the velocity reaches the speed of
sound (M = 1), the flow chokes and the Mach number cannot be increased beyond M = 1. We
want the highest possible velocity in the test section of the wind tunnel. For a supersonic wind
tunnel, we contract the flow until it chokes in the throat of a nozzle. We then diffuse the flow
which increases the speed supersonically. The test section of the supersonic tunnel is placed at
the end of the diffuser. From a consideration of conservation of mass for a compressible flow, we
can design the test section to produce a desired velocity or Mach based on the area in the test
section. On the figure we note the changes in Mach number, velocity and pressure through a
supersonic wind tunnel design.
SPECIFICATIONS:
Type of tunnel : Subsonic Suction Type
Test section : 300mm X 300mm X 500mm (B X H X L)
Air speed : Up to 50m/s
Contraction ratio : 9:1
Overall size : 1.2m X 2.2m X 7.0m
Power required : AC 3 phase, 440 volts, 14A
Drive : Axial flow fan driven variable speed DC Motor
with Thyristor Controller
MAIN PARTS:
Honey comb inlet mesh screen, effuser, diffuser, blower unit with DC motor, lift/drag
balance, multitube manometer, smoke generator, pitot tube and transverse mechanism, digital
lift/drag indicators.
PREPARATION:
Tunnel balance is a two-component type designed using electrical strain gauge to indicate
lift and drag forces on digital lift and drag indicator in kg and Newton. Balance is intended to
indicate lift and drag in case of aerofoil and drag force in case of bluff bodies. Example:
spherical, hemispherical, round disc and automobile models. These models are put on the string.
Before the model is put on the string air is blown and it is necessary to calibrate balance
along with digital meters. For the purpose, a calibration jig is provided with a set of weights.
Fix calibration jigs and to the top of the test section with the help of wing nuts. Fix
dummy rod to string and see that the top dummy rod is at the center of test section. Now pass the
wire around the dummy rod and hang it to the weights.
Switch on the strain indicator and observe the reading on it be zero. If readings are not
same after weights are added use CAL knob to obtain the correct reading. Remove the
calibration jig dummy rod and fix the model and run the tunnel for studying various types of
experiments.
OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS:
All the components mentioned are integrated for conducting various experiments. Follow
the instructions given below.
• Connect the power card to the 400v, 30A, 3PH AC power supply with neutral and earth
connections.
• Keep the speed controller knob at 0
• Check all the switches of the controller are in OFF position before starting
• Put on the mains and observe the main indicator. Lights are ON at the bottom of the
control panel
• Now switch on the control and observe the console light is ON
• Select particular experiment and fix the requirement model in the test section
• Follow the instruction for “preparation and operation” of different attachments
accessories explained in earlier pages.
• Observe that no tools or loose parts are left in the test section and then close the
transparent window.
• Now increase the speed control knobs slowly in the clockwise direction and observe the
DC motor picking up the speed gradually.
• Observe the movement of manometer liquid in inclined manometer (velocity indicator).
Set the requirement valve of air velocity by adjusting the knob on DC drive.
• Take readings in the respective experiments detailed.
• While stopping, gradually decrease the speed and then switch of the DC motor
controller.
NOTE:
• Do not clean the transparent test section windows with petrol, kerosene or other
chemical detergents. Use only the light soap water.
• Check the electrical installation property before switching it ON.
• Do not bring any fire near the smoke generator during the flow visualization
experiment.
EXPERIMENT: 01 Date:
APPARATUS REQUIRED:
FORMULAE:
P0 - Pressure from the pitot port (or) Total pressure (or) Stagnation pressure
Ps - Pressure from the static port (or) Static pressure (or) reference pressure
ρw - Density of water
ρa - Density of air
g - Acceleration due to gravity
h - Height of the liquid in the multi-tube manometer
q - Dynamic pressure
V∞ - Velocity of air (or) Free stream velocity
PROCEDURE:
• Plot a graph between RPM Vs test section velocity and movement of Pitot - static tube
inside the test section in vertical direction Vs test section velocity.
• Compare it with the given test section velocities for a given RPM in the Wind tunnel
manual.
TABULATION:
TABLE 1
Test section
S.NO RPM
velocity (m/s)
1 800
2 700
3 600
4 500
5 400
TABLE 2
1 160
2 120
3 80
4 40
5 0
INFERENCES:
RESULT:
Thus, the graphs are plotted for velocity profiles against multiple RPM settings of
tunnel’s suction motor and the vertical transverse intervals in T/S in a subsonic wind tunnel. The
graphs are compared with the actual test section velocities given in the manual.
EXPERIMENT: 02 Date:
SMOKE FLOW VISUALIZATION AT LOW SPEEDS
AIM:
To study flow over an aerodynamic model at low speed by smoke generation technique.
APPARATUS REQUIRED:
• Fill the overhead bottle with diesel and check the level.
• Connect the base pipe of the distributor to the outlet of the smoke generator.
• Initially open the needle value and allow the diesel to flow in the pipe.
• After the initial heating, the smoke starts coming out of smoke distributor.
• Switch ON the wind tunnel and make sure that the smoke flow is uniform and visible.
INFERENCE:
CONCLUSION:
Thus, the flow fields around the given model of different orientation were analyzed using
smoke flow visualization. The flow fields are sketched manually and, in some occasions,
photographed for future analyses.
EXPERIMENT: 03 Date:
TUFT FLOW VISUALIZATION ON AIRFOIL MODEL AT LOW SPEEDS.
AIM:
To study the tuft flow visualization of airfoil models at different angles of incidences at
low speeds.
APPARATUS REQUIRED:
• Observe the flow pattern through tuft thread movement at different orientation of models.
INFERENCE:
CONCLUSION:
Thus the flow fields around the given model of different orientation were analyzed using
smoke flow visualization. The flow fields are sketched manually and in some occasions
AIM:
To determine the surface pressure distribution over a symmetric airfoil and to calculate
the lift and drag of the airfoil
APPARATUS REQUIRED:
FORMULA:
Δ Px
Coefficient of pressure, Cp =
q∞
∆Hx = hx – h0
1
Coefficient of normal force, Cn = ∑ ( C p ,l−C p , u ) ∆ xi
c i
1
Coefficient of normal force, Ca = ∑ ( C p ,u ) ∆ y u - (C ¿ ¿ p ,l ∆ y l )¿
c i
1 2
Lift, L = L= ρ ∞ V ∞ S C L
2
1 2
Drag, D = D= ρ∞ V ∞ S C D
2
Where,
Δ Px - Difference in Static Pressure
px - Local static Pressure (or) Pressure from the pressure tapping
p∞ - Free stream static pressure (or) Tunnel Static pressure
q -Free stream dynamic pressure
ρw - Density of water
ρa - Density of air
g - Acceleration due to gravity
hx - Height of the liquid in the multi-tube manometer during experiment
h0 -Initial height of the liquid in the multi-tube manometer before experiment starts.
∆Hx - Pressure head difference in cm of water.
V∞ - Velocity of air or free stream velocity
S - Surface area of the airfoil.
x - 1, 2, 3…12
∆xi - consecutive distance between ports
∆yu & ∆yl – Vertical distance of ports from chord length
C p ,u & C p ,l – Coefficient of pressure at upper and lower surface ports
PROCEDURE
• Connect the pressure tapping tube bundle of the airfoil to the tube bundle of the multi
tube manometer as per the numbering.
• The readings are tabulated and the corresponding value of co-efficient of pressure (Cp) is
noted.
• A graph is plotted between Cp and x/c (location of pressure tapping with respect to the
chord)
• Values of Cp can be used to calculate the lift and drag of the airfoil
OBSERVATIONS AND TABULATIONS:
TABLE 1:
Water
head at
x (distance of
free Pressure head Coefficient of
Port pressure tapping
No. from leading edge)
xn/c stream ∆H = h2 – h1 Pressure Cp
velocity V (m) (N/m2) (no unit)
in m
h2
(m)
−2
1 1.5 ×10 0.15
−2
2 3 ×10 0.3
−2
3 UPPER 4.5 × 10 0.45
SURFAC
E −2
4 6 ×10 0.6
−2
5 7.5 ×10 0.75
−2
6 9 ×10 0.9
7 −2 0.9
9 ×10
8 −2 0.75
7.5 ×10
9 LOWER −2 0.6
6 ×10
SURFAC
10 E −2 0.45
4.5 × 10
11 −2 0.3
3 ×10
12 −2 0.15
1.5 ×10
TABLE 2:
Vertical
distance of
Consecutive
Port ports from
distance, C p ,l∨C p ,u ( C p ,l−C p , u ) ∆ xi (C ¿¿ p ,u) ∆ y u−(C ¿ ¿ p , l ∆ y l)¿
No. chord
∆xi
length, ∆yu
or ∆yl
1 1.5
12 1.5
2 1.5
11 1.5
3 1.5
10 1.5
4 1.5
9 1.5
5 1.5
8 1.5
6 1.5
7 1.5
∑= ∑=
RESULT
Thus the pressure distribution over a symmetrical airfoil is calculated and the graph has
been plotted between Cp and x/c by plotting Cp in the ordinate and x/c as abscissa and lift &
drag forces are calculated.
EXPERIMENT: 05 Date:
AIM:
To determine the surface pressure distribution over a cambered airfoil and to calculate
the lift and drag of the airfoil.
APPARATUS REQUIRED:
Cambered Airfoil model with pressure tapping
Subsonic wind tunnel
Multi-tube manometer
FORMULA:
Δ Px
Coefficient of pressure, Cp =
q∞
Where, Px = px - p∞ = ρwg∆Hx
∆Hx = hx – h0
1
Coefficient of normal force, Cn = ∑ ( C p ,l +C p ,u ) ∆ x i
c i
1
Coefficient of normal force, Ca = ∑ ( C p ,u ) ∆ y u - (C ¿ ¿ p ,l ∆ y l )¿
c i
1 2
Lift, L= ρ ∞ V ∞ S C L
2
1 2
Drag, D= ρ∞ V ∞ S C D
2
Where,
Δ Px - Difference in Static Pressure
px - Local static Pressure (or) Pressure from the pressure tapping
p∞ - Free stream static pressure (or) Tunnel Static pressure
q -Free stream dynamic pressure
ρw - Density of water
ρa - Density of air
g - Acceleration due to gravity
hx - Height of the liquid in the multi-tube manometer during experiment
h0 -Initial height of the liquid in the multi-tube manometer before experiment starts.
∆Hx - Pressure head difference in cm of water.
V∞ - Velocity of air or free stream velocity
S - Surface area of the airfoil.
x - 1, 2, 3…12
∆xi - consecutive distance between ports
∆yu & ∆yl – Vertical distance of ports from chord length
C p ,u & C p ,l – Coefficient of pressure at upper and lower surface ports
PROCEDURE
• Connect the pressure tapping tube bundle of the airfoil to the tube bundle of the multi
tube manometer as per the numbering.
• The readings are tabulated and the corresponding value of co-efficient of pressure (Cp) is
noted.
• A graph is plotted between Cp and x/c (location of pressure tapping with respect to the
chord)
• Values of Cp can be used to calculate the lift and drag of the airfoil
OBSERVATIONS AND TABULATIONS:
TABLE 1:
Water
head at
x (distance of
free Pressure head Coefficient of
Port pressure tapping
No. from leading edge) in
xn/c stream ∆H = h2 – h1 Pressure Cp
velocity V (m) (N/m2) (no unit)
m
h2
(m)
1 1.5 ×10
−2 0.15
2 3 ×10
−2 0.3
3 UPPER −2 0.45
4.5 × 10
SURFAC
4 6 ×10
−2 0.6
E
5 7.5 ×10
−2 0.75
6 9 ×10
−2 0.9
0.9
7 −2
9 ×10
0.75
8 −2
7.5 ×10
0.6
9 LOWER −2
6 ×10
SURFAC
0.45
10 E −2
4.5 × 10
0.3
11 −2
3 ×10
0.15
12 −2
1 .5× 10
TABLE 2:
Vertical
Consecutiv distance of
Port e distance, ports from C p ,l∨C p ,u ( C p ,l−C p , u ) ∆ xi (C ¿¿ p ,u)∆ y u−(C ¿ ¿ p , l ∆ y l)¿
No. ∆xi chord
×10
−2
length, ∆yu
or ∆yl
1 1.8
12 1.9
2 1.4
11 1.5
3 1.5
10 1.4
4 1.4
9 1.5
5 1.5
8 1.5
6 1.7
7 1.4
∑= ∑=
INFERENCE:
RESULT
Thus the pressure distribution over a cambered airfoil is calculated and the graph has
been plotted between Cp and x/c by plotting Cp in the ordinate and x/c as abscissa.
EXPERIMENT: 06 Date:
AIM:
To determine the pressure drag of cambered airfoil at low angle of incidence by using
pitot static probe wake survey.
APPARATUS REQUIRED:
Low speed subsonic wind tunnel
Pitot – Static tube
Cambered airfoil
THEORY
The profile drag of a two-dimensional airfoil is the sum of the form drag due to boundary layer
separation (pressure drag), and the skin friction drag. Usually the profile drag is determined from
force measurements made using a mechanical balance attached to the model. In the two-
dimensional case (where the airfoil spans the tunnel - wall to wall), the profile drag may also be
determined from momentum considerations by comparing the velocity ahead of the model with
that in its wake; this method is used here and presupposes the flow is incompressible.
incident velocity V∞, Fig. 1. The velocities at section CD can be measured experimentally using
pitot rake or by moving the Pitot - static tube vertically.
FORMULAE:
1 2
Po – Ps = q = ρwgh = ρ ∞V ∞
2
2
2 ∑
C d= V i (V ∞−V i )∆ l i
cV∞ i
Where ,
Po - Pressure from the pitot port (or) Total pressure (or) Stagnation pressure
Ps - Pressure from the static port (or) Static pressure (or) reference pressure
ρw - Density of water
ρa - Density of air
g - Acceleration due to gravity
h - Height of the liquid in the multi-tube manometer
q - Dynamic pressure
V∞ - Velocity of air (or) free stream velocity
c - airfoil chord length
Vi - Velocity at various vertical distances behind the airfoil.
∆li - consecutive vertical distance where velocities are measured
PROCEDURE:
V∞ = 16 m/s
Consecutive distance
traversed by pitot tube, ∆li Velocity, Vi (m/s) Cd
S.No. (m)
α =0 0 α =4 0 α =0 0 α =4 0 α =0 0 α =4 0
−3
1 5 ×10
−3 5 ×10
−3
2 5 ×10
−3 5 ×10
−3
3 5 ×10
−3 5 ×10
−3
4 5 ×10
−3 5 ×10
−3
5 5 ×10
−3 5 ×10
−3
6 5 ×10
−3 5 ×10
−3 −3
7 5 ×10 5 ×10
−3 −3
8 5 ×10 5 ×10
−3 −3
9 5 ×10 5 ×10
−3 −3
10 5 ×10 5 ×10
−3 −3
11 5 ×10 5 ×10
−3 −3
12 5 ×10 5 ×10
−3 −3
13 5 ×10 5 ×10
−3 −3
14 5 ×10 5 ×10
−3 −3
15 5 ×10 5 ×10
∑= ∑=
INFERENCE:
RESULT:
Thus the C d on cambered airfoil at different angle of attack is determined using the wake
survey.
EXPERIMENT: 07 Date:
MEASUREMENT OF AERODYNAMIC LOADS USING WIND TUNNEL BALANCE
AIM:
To measure the aerodynamic forces on airfoil models at different angle of attack using
wind tunnel balance.
APPARATUS REQUIRED:
FORMULAE:
L
C L=
1
ρ V2S
2 ∞ ∞
D
C D=
1
ρ V2 S
2 ∞ ∞
Where,
CL - Co-efficient of lift
CD - Co-efficient of drag
L - Lift force
D - Drag force
ρ∞ - Density of air
V∞ - Free stream velocity
S - Surface area of the airfoil
PROCEDURE:
• Fix the model on the vertical string and lock it.
• Close the test section and ensure that no items are left inside the test section before
closing.
• Blank all the points.
• Switch ON the wind tunnel
• Set the force indicators to zero.
• Fix the required air velocity using the velocity indicator.
• Now by changing the angle of attack the corresponding lift force and drag force are
noted down.
• The same is repeated for different angle of attacks
TABLE 1
1 16
2 14
3 12
4 10
5 8
6 5
7 0
8 -2
9 -4
10 -6
TABLE 2
TABLE 3
Co-efficient of Co-efficient of
S. No Angle of Attack
Lift Drag
1 16
2 14
3 12
4 10
5 8
6 5
7 0
8 -2
9 -4
10 -6
INFERENCE:
RESULT:
EXPERIMENT: 08 Date:
AIM:
To measure the surface pressure distribution on an infinite wing with flap at different flap
angle.
APPARATUS REQUIRED:
FORMULAE:
L
C L=
1
ρ V2S
2 ∞ ∞
D
C D=
1
ρ V2 S
2 ∞ ∞
Where,
CL - Co-efficient of lift
CD - Co-efficient of drag
L - Lift force
D - Drag force
ρ∞ - Density of air
V∞ - Free stream velocity
S - Surface area of the airfoil
PROCEDURE:
−2
Span (b) = 27.8 ×10 m Chord (c) =23.5 ×10−2m V∞ = 16 m/s
Surface area of the airfoil (S) = bxc = (27.8 ×23.5 ¿ 10−2 = 0.065 m2
TABLE 1
S.N Lift force Drag force
Angle of flap
o (kg) (kg)
1 0
2 5
3 10
4 15
5 20
6 25
7 30
8 35
9 40
10 45
TABLE 2
S.N Lift force Drag force
Angle of flap
o (N) (N)
1 0
2 5
3 10
4 15
5 20
6 25
7 30
8 35
9 40
10 45
TABLE 3
Co-efficient of Co-efficient of
S. No Angle of flap
Lift Drag
1 0
2 5
3 10
4 15
5 20
6 25
7 30
8 35
9 40
10 45
INFERENCE:
RESULT:
Thus the CL, CD on an airfoil with flap at different angle of flap is determined.
EXPERIMENT: 09 (a) Date:
PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION OVER SMOOTH CIRCULAR CYLINDERS
AIM:
To determine the pressure distribution over a smooth circular cylinder
APPARATUS REQUIRED:
FORMULA:
Δ Px
Coefficient of pressure, Coefficient of pressure, Cp =
q∞
∆Px = px - p∞ = ρwg∆Hx
∆Hx = hx – h0
1 2
q ∞= ρ ∞ V ∞
2
Where,
∆Px - Difference in Static Pressure
px - Local static Pressure (or) Pressure from the pressure tapping
po - Free stream static pressure (or) Tunnel Static pressure
q∞ -Free stream dynamic pressure
ρw - Density of water
ρa - Density of air
g - Acceleration due to gravity
hx - Height of the liquid in the multi-tube manometer during experiment
h0 -Initial height of the liquid in the multi-tube manometer before experiment starts.
∆Hx - Pressure head difference in cm of water.
V∞ - Velocity of air or free stream velocity
x - 1, 2, 3…12
PROCEDURE
• The cylinder is mounted in the test section with one of the pressure tapping’s facing the
flow.
• The tube bundle from the pressure tapping is connected to the tubes of the multi-tube
manometer according to the numbering.
• The readings are tabulated and the corresponding value of co-efficient of pressure (Cp) is
noted.
• A graph is plotted between Cp and the angular location of the pressure tapping (θ).
TABLE 1
1 450
2 850
TABLE 2
Free Manometric pressure reading (N/m2)
RP
S. No stream
M
velocity
V∞
1 450
2 850
TABLE 3
Δ Px
Experimental result, Cp=
q∞
p x− p ∞ Theoretical result,
¿ Cp=1-4sin2θ
Pressure 1
S. No ρ V2
tapping 2 ∞ ∞
RPM= 450 RPM=850
θ (Degree) Cp
V∞= V∞=
1 1 0
2 2 30
3 3 60
4 4 90
5 5 120
6 6 150
7 7 180
8 8 -150
9 9 -120
10 10 -90
11 11 -60
12 12 -30
RESULT:
Thus the pressure distribution over a rough circular cylinder is calculated and the graph has been
plotted between Cp and the angular location of the pressure tapping (θ).
EXPERIMENT: 09 (b) Date:
AIM:
APPARATUS REQUIRED:
∆Hx = hx – h0
1 2
q ∞= ρ ∞ V ∞
2
Where,
∆Px - Difference in Static Pressure
px - Local static Pressure (or) Pressure from the pressure tapping
po - Free stream static pressure (or) Tunnel Static pressure
q∞ -Free stream dynamic pressure
ρw - Density of water
ρa - Density of air
g - Acceleration due to gravity
hx - Height of the liquid in the multi-tube manometer during experiment
h0 -Initial height of the liquid in the multi-tube manometer before experiment starts.
∆Hx - Pressure head difference in cm of water.
V∞ - Velocity of air or free stream velocity
x - 1, 2, 3…12
PROCEDURE
• The cylinder is mounted in the test section with one of the pressure tapping’s facing the
flow.
• The tube bundle from the pressure tapping is connected to the tubes of the multi-tube
manometer according to the numbering.
• The readings are tabulated and the corresponding value of co-efficient of pressure (Cp) is
noted.
• A graph is plotted between Cp and the angular location of the pressure tapping (θ).
TABLE 1
Free Manometric pressure reading (cm of water)
stream
S. No RPM
velocity,
V∞ h1 h2 h3 h4 h5 h6 h7 h8 h9 h10 h11 h12
1 450
2 850
TABLE 2
Free
stream Manometric pressure reading (N/m2)
S. No RPM velocity
,
V∞
1 450
2 850
TABLE 3
Δ Px
Experimental result, Cp=
q∞
p x− p ∞ Theoretical result,
¿ Cp=1-4sin2θ
Pressure 1
S. No ρ ∞ V 2∞
tapping 2
RPM= 450 RPM=850
θ (Degree) Cp
V∞= V∞=
1 1 0
2 2 30
3 3 60
4 4 90
5 5 120
6 6 150
7 7 180
8 8 -150
9 9 -120
10 10 -90
11 11 -60
12 12 -30
RESULT:
Thus the pressure distribution over a rough circular cylinder is calculated and the graph has been
plotted between Cp and the angular location of the pressure tapping (θ).
EXPERIMENT: 10 Date:
AIM:
To determine the pressure distribution over a vertical muti-cylinder arrangement.
APPARATUS REQUIRED:
• Multi-cylinder model with pressure tapping
• Subsonic wind tunnel
• Multi-tube manometer
FORMULAE:
Δ Px
Coefficient of pressure, Coefficient of pressure, Cp =
q∞
∆Hx = hx – h0
1 2
q ∞= ρ ∞ V ∞
2
Where,
∆Px - Difference in Static Pressure
px - Local static Pressure (or) Pressure from the pressure tapping
po - Free stream static pressure (or) Tunnel Static pressure
q∞ -Free stream dynamic pressure
ρw - Density of water
ρa - Density of air
g - Acceleration due to gravity
hx - Height of the liquid in the multi-tube manometer during experiment
-Initial height of the liquid in the multi-tube manometer before experiment starts.
- Pressure head difference in cm of water.
V∞ - Velocity of air or free stream velocity
x - 1, 2, 3…12
PROCEDURE
• The multi-cylinder model is mounted in the test section with one of the pressure tapping’s
facing the flow.
• The tube bundle from the pressure tapping is connected to the tubes of the multi-tube
manometer according to the numbering.
• The readings are tabulated and the corresponding value of co-efficient of pressure (Cp) is
noted.
TABLE 1
Free
stream
velocity Manometric pressure reading (cm of water)
S. No RPM
Obstruction V∞
(m/s)
h1 h2 h3 h4 h5
With
1 obstruction 820
2 Without 760
obstruction
TABLE 2
Free
stream
2
SI.N velocity Manometric pressure reading (N/m )
RPM
o Obstruction V∞
(m/s)
h1 h2 h3 h4 h5
With
1 obstruction
820
2 Without
760
obstruction
TABLE 3
Δ Px p x− p ∞
=
Cp= q ∞ 1
Pressure ρ∞ V 2∞
S. No 2
tapping
RPM=820 RPM= 760
V∞ = with obstruction V∞ = without obstruction
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
INFERENCE:
RESULT:
Thus the pressure distribution over a rough circular cylinder is calculated and the graph has been
plotted between Cp and the angular location of the pressure tapping (θ).
MODEL VIVA QUESTIONS