Scribd
Upload
17 views22 pages

Session Introduction

The document discusses what econometrics is and why it is a separate discipline from economics and statistics. It covers the key steps in an econometric analysis including stating an economic theory, specifying a mathematical and econometric model, obtaining data, estimating the model, hypothesis testing, forecasting, and using the model for policy purposes.

Uploaded by

hilmiazis15
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
17 views22 pages

Session Introduction

The document discusses what econometrics is and why it is a separate discipline from economics and statistics. It covers the key steps in an econometric analysis including stating an economic theory, specifying a mathematical and econometric model, obtaining data, estimating the model, hypothesis testing, forecasting, and using the model for policy purposes.

Uploaded by

hilmiazis15
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 22

ECONOMETRICS

Introduction

Dr. Indra, S.Si, M.Si


WHAT IS ECONOMETRICS?

• Econometrics means “economic measurement”. the scope of


econometrics is much broader, as can be seen from the
following definitions:
• “Consists of the application of mathematical statistics to
economic data to lend empirical support to the models
constructed by mathematical economics and to obtain
numerical results” (Gerhard 1968).
• “Econometrics may be defined as the social science in which
the tools of economic theory, mathematics, and statistical
inference are applied to the analysis of economic phenomena”
(Goldberger 1964).
• “Econometrics is concerned with the empirical determination
of economic laws” (Theil 1971).
WHY ECONOMETRICS IS A SEPARATE DISCIPLINE?

the subject deserves to be studied in its own right for the following
reasons:
• Economic theory makes statements or hypotheses that are
mostly qualitative in nature (the law of demand), the law does
not provide any numerical measure of the relationship. This is
the job of the econometrician.
• The main concern of mathematical economics is to express
economic theory in mathematical form without regard to
measurability or empirical verification of the theory.
Econometrics is mainly interested in the empirical verification of
economic theory.
• Economic statistics is mainly concerned with collecting,
processing, and presenting economic data in the form of charts
and tables. It does not go any further. The one who does that is
the econometrician.
1. Statement of Theory or Hypothesis
• Keynes states that on average, consumers increase their consumption as
their income increases, but not as much as the increase in their income
(MPC < 1).

2. Specification of the Mathematical Model of Consumption (single-


equation model)
Y = β 1 + β2X 0 < β2 < 1 (I.3.1)

Y = consumption expenditure and (dependent variable)


X = income, (independent, or explanatory variable)
β1 = the intercept
β2 = the slope coefficient

• The slope coefficient β2 measures the MPC.


• Geometrically,
3. Specification of the Econometric Model of Consumption
• The relationships between economic variables are generally inexact. In
addition to income, other variables affect consumption expenditure. For
example, size of family, ages of the members in the family, family religion,
etc., are likely to exert some influence on consumption.

• To allow for the inexact relationships between economic variables, (I.3.1) is


modified as follows:

• Y = β1 + β2X + u (I.3.2)

• where u, known as the disturbance, or error, term, is a random (stochastic)


variable that has well-defined probabilistic properties. The disturbance term
u may well represent all those factors that affect consumption but are not
taken into account explicitly.
• (I.3.2) is an example of a linear regression model, i.e., it hypothesizes that Y
is linearly related to X, but that the relationship between the two is not exact; it
is subject to individual variation. The econometric model of (I.3.2) can be
depicted as shown in Figure I.2.
4. Obtaining Data
• To obtain the numerical values of β1 and β2, we need data. Look at Table
I.1, which relate to the personal consumption expenditure (PCE) and the
gross domestic product (GDP). The data are in “real” terms.
The data are plotted in Figure I.3
5. Estimation of the Econometric Model
• Regression analysis is the main tool used to obtain the
estimates. Using this technique and the data given in Table I.1,
we obtain the following estimates of β1 and β2, namely, −184.08
and 0.7064. Thus, the estimated consumption function is:

• Yˆ = −184.08 + 0.7064Xi (I.3.3)

• The estimated regression line is shown in Figure I.3. The


regression line fits the data quite well. The slope coefficient
(i.e., the MPC) was about 0.70, an increase in real income of 1
dollar led, on average, to an increase of about 70 cents in real
consumption.
6. Hypothesis Testing
• That is to find out whether the estimates obtained in, Eq. (I.3.3)
are in accord with the expectations of the theory that is being
tested. Keynes expected the MPC to be positive but less than 1.
In our example we found the MPC to be about 0.70. But before
we accept this finding as confirmation of Keynesian
consumption theory, we must enquire whether this estimate is
sufficiently below unity. In other words, is 0.70 statistically less
than 1? If it is, it may support Keynes’ theory.
• Such confirmation or refutation of economic theories on the
basis of sample evidence is based on a branch of statistical
theory known as statistical inference (hypothesis testing).
7. Forecasting or Prediction
• To illustrate, suppose we want to predict the mean consumption
expenditure for 1997. The GDP value for 1997 was 7269.8 billion dollars
consumption would be:

Yˆ1997 = −184.0779 + 0.7064 (7269.8) = 4951.3 (I.3.4)

• The actual value of the consumption expenditure reported in 1997 was


4913.5 billion dollars. The estimated model (I.3.3) thus over-predicted the
actual consumption expenditure by about 37.82 billion dollars. We could
say the forecast error is about 37.8 billion dollars, which is about 0.76
percent of the actual GDP value for 1997.
• Now suppose the government decides to propose a reduction in the income
tax. What will be the effect of such a policy on income and thereby on
consumption expenditure and ultimately on employment?
• Suppose that, as a result of the proposed policy change, investment
expenditure increases. What will be the effect on the economy? As
macroeconomic theory shows, the change in income following, a dollar’s
worth of change in investment expenditure is given by the income multiplier
M, which is defined as:

• M = 1/(1 − MPC) (I.3.5)

• The multiplier is about M = 3.33. That is, an increase (decrease) of a dollar in


investment will eventually lead to more than a threefold increase (decrease)
in income; note that it takes time for the multiplier to work.
• The critical value in this computation is MPC. Thus, a quantitative estimate
of MPC provides valuable information for policy purposes. Knowing MPC,
one can predict the future course of income, consumption expenditure, and
employment following a change in the government’s fiscal policies.
8. Use of the Model for Control or Policy Purposes
• Suppose we have the estimated consumption function given in (I.3.3).
Suppose further the government believes that consumer expenditure of
about 4900 will keep the unemployment rate at its current level of about 4.2%.
What level of income will guarantee the target amount of consumption
expenditure?
• If the regression results given in (I.3.3) seem reasonable, simple arithmetic
will show that:

• 4900 = −184.0779 + 0.7064X (I.3.6)

• which gives X = 7197, approximately. That is, an income level of about 7197
(billion) dollars, given an MPC of about 0.70, will produce an expenditure
of about 4900 billion dollars. As these calculations suggest, an estimated
model may be used for control, or policy, purposes. By appropriate fiscal
and monetary policy mix, the government can manipulate the control
variable X to produce the desired level of the target variable Y.
THANK YOU…….

You might also like